Using Delft3D FM for river engineering:
efficiently taking into account parameter
uncertainty
Koen Berends
12 November 2018
Delft Software Days 2018
2
River Rhine
River Waal
1. Nijmegen Lent: max. -27 cm* @ ~350 million €
2. Groyne lowering: max. -12 cm* @ ~290 million €
3. Millingerwaard: max. - 9 cm* @ ~125 million €
Top 3 “Room for the River” projects on River Waal:
Source: Eindevaluatie Ruimte voor de Rivier & infrasite.nl
Models are used to predict effects of river engineering
*Predicted decrease of water level during design discharge after intervention
Introduction – method – results – take home message
68 cm
Water level on River Waal during design discharge
Introduction – method – results – take home message
Is there historical evidence?
1. Describe uncertainty in model assumptions
yes • Probabilistic (GLUE, DREAM)
• Deterministic (Calibration)no
Forwarduncertaintyanalysis
“Inverse problem”
2. Propagate uncertainty forward (input  output)
3. Summarise uncertainty of model output
Introduction – method – results – take home message
Natural grassland
Production meadow
Pioneer vegetation
Dry herbaceous vegetation
Softwood forest
Roughness mapping: trachytopes
Describe uncertainty in model assumptions
+ vegetation parameters (37) + classification error (1)
bed roughness (1)
Trachytope definition file (*.tdf) Area file (*.arl)
Introduction – method – results – take home message
Monte Carlo simulation
reference case
Monte Carlo simulation
intervention case
- =
Monte Carlo simulation
intervention effect
Common approach:
1000* simulations 12 x 1000 simulations 13,000 simulations
@ ~ 3hr/120MB per simulation
Introduction – method – results – take home message
Monte Carlo simulation
reference case
Monte Carlo simulation
intervention case
- =
Monte Carlo simulation
intervention effect
New approach:
1000* simulations 12 x 20 simulations 1240 simulations
@ ~ 3hr/120MB per simulation
Introduction – method – results – take home message
Δ𝐻 = 𝑌 − 𝑋
Water level before intervention (X)
Water level after
intervention (Y)
The effect of the intervention
Introduction – method – results – take home message
Water level before intervention (X)
Water level after
intervention (Y)
Identity line (Δ𝐻=0)
Δ𝐻i
Introduction – method – results – take home message
Water level before intervention (X)
Water level after
intervention (Y)
𝑌 = 𝑓 𝑋 + 𝜖
Introduction – method – results – take home message
Introduction – method – results – take home message
Introduction – method – results – take home message
Cumulativeprobability
Water level
Cumulative probability density functions
X (Pre-intervention) known
1
0
Y (Post-intervention) unknown
Introduction – method – results – take home message
Introduction – method – results – take home message
Introduction – method – results – take home message
We found relative uncertainty* between 15% and 80%
* = 90% confidence band / expected effect
Introduction – method – results – take home message
Take home message:
• Novel method to estimate model uncertainty
• Reduced number of model evaluations
• Especially helpful for large-scale analysis & iterative design
To learn more:
• Contact: k.d.berends@utwente.nl or koen.berends@deltares.nl
• Methodological background: Berends et al. (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.05.021
• Large-scale application: NHESS discussion paper
• Source code for CORAL: https://github.com/kdberends/coral
Introduction – method – results – take homemessage

DSD-INT 2018 Using Delft3D FM for river engineering: efficiently taking into account parameter uncertainty - Berends

  • 1.
    Using Delft3D FMfor river engineering: efficiently taking into account parameter uncertainty Koen Berends 12 November 2018 Delft Software Days 2018
  • 2.
  • 3.
    1. Nijmegen Lent:max. -27 cm* @ ~350 million € 2. Groyne lowering: max. -12 cm* @ ~290 million € 3. Millingerwaard: max. - 9 cm* @ ~125 million € Top 3 “Room for the River” projects on River Waal: Source: Eindevaluatie Ruimte voor de Rivier & infrasite.nl Models are used to predict effects of river engineering *Predicted decrease of water level during design discharge after intervention Introduction – method – results – take home message
  • 4.
    68 cm Water levelon River Waal during design discharge Introduction – method – results – take home message
  • 5.
    Is there historicalevidence? 1. Describe uncertainty in model assumptions yes • Probabilistic (GLUE, DREAM) • Deterministic (Calibration)no Forwarduncertaintyanalysis “Inverse problem” 2. Propagate uncertainty forward (input  output) 3. Summarise uncertainty of model output Introduction – method – results – take home message
  • 6.
    Natural grassland Production meadow Pioneervegetation Dry herbaceous vegetation Softwood forest Roughness mapping: trachytopes
  • 7.
    Describe uncertainty inmodel assumptions + vegetation parameters (37) + classification error (1) bed roughness (1) Trachytope definition file (*.tdf) Area file (*.arl) Introduction – method – results – take home message
  • 8.
    Monte Carlo simulation referencecase Monte Carlo simulation intervention case - = Monte Carlo simulation intervention effect Common approach: 1000* simulations 12 x 1000 simulations 13,000 simulations @ ~ 3hr/120MB per simulation Introduction – method – results – take home message
  • 9.
    Monte Carlo simulation referencecase Monte Carlo simulation intervention case - = Monte Carlo simulation intervention effect New approach: 1000* simulations 12 x 20 simulations 1240 simulations @ ~ 3hr/120MB per simulation Introduction – method – results – take home message
  • 10.
    Δ𝐻 = 𝑌− 𝑋 Water level before intervention (X) Water level after intervention (Y) The effect of the intervention Introduction – method – results – take home message
  • 11.
    Water level beforeintervention (X) Water level after intervention (Y) Identity line (Δ𝐻=0) Δ𝐻i Introduction – method – results – take home message
  • 12.
    Water level beforeintervention (X) Water level after intervention (Y) 𝑌 = 𝑓 𝑋 + 𝜖 Introduction – method – results – take home message
  • 13.
    Introduction – method– results – take home message
  • 14.
    Introduction – method– results – take home message
  • 15.
    Cumulativeprobability Water level Cumulative probabilitydensity functions X (Pre-intervention) known 1 0 Y (Post-intervention) unknown Introduction – method – results – take home message
  • 16.
    Introduction – method– results – take home message
  • 17.
    Introduction – method– results – take home message
  • 18.
    We found relativeuncertainty* between 15% and 80% * = 90% confidence band / expected effect Introduction – method – results – take home message
  • 19.
    Take home message: •Novel method to estimate model uncertainty • Reduced number of model evaluations • Especially helpful for large-scale analysis & iterative design To learn more: • Contact: k.d.berends@utwente.nl or koen.berends@deltares.nl • Methodological background: Berends et al. (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.05.021 • Large-scale application: NHESS discussion paper • Source code for CORAL: https://github.com/kdberends/coral Introduction – method – results – take homemessage