This document is Plaintiff Truman Bujduveanu's response to the Defendants' motion to strike Plaintiff's pocket entries 114 and 115. The Plaintiff argues that his documents were filed properly under the local rules and provide a response to the Defendants' reply brief and supplemental motion. The Plaintiff asserts that the Defendants have made false statements to the court. Specifically, the Plaintiff provides evidence that the Defendants were aware of the incident in question, contrary to their statements, as shown through documents obtained from the US Probation Office through subpoena. The Plaintiff contends that striking his documents would improperly advantage the Defendants in their litigation strategy.
1. The plaintiff, Traian Bujduveanu, filed a motion for summary judgment in a civil case against Dimas Charteris House and employees Derek Thomas, Lashanda Adams, and Ana Gipert.
2. The plaintiff alleges that while residing at Dimas Charteris House halfway house, a residential reentry center, he was constantly harassed, intimidated, and humiliated without regard to his medical conditions or religious beliefs in violation of his civil rights.
3. Specifically, the plaintiff argues that he was denied religious accommodations, discriminated against due to his religion and national origin, and that his requests for medical documentation were ignored constituting mistreatment.
This document is a motion for summary judgment filed by Plaintiff Traian Duvau in a civil case. It provides 18 pieces of evidence in support of the motion, including medical records, witness statements, and documentation signed by the defendants. If granted, the motion would result in a judgment in favor of the Plaintiff without needing to go to trial.
Palavras Cruzadas sobre homonimos1 respostasDilmara Faria
1. The document is a worksheet with homonyms and paronyms in Portuguese arranged in a crossword puzzle format with clues provided in both horizontal and vertical directions.
2. The clues include words that sound similar but have different meanings or spellings in Portuguese such as "banco" (bench) and "banco" (bank), and words with related or overlapping meanings such as "mandato" (power of attorney) and "mandato" (congressional term).
3. Solving the crossword puzzle requires matching each clue with the correct corresponding word in the grid based on sound and meaning.
This document discusses encryption techniques for securing user accounts on servers. Specifically, it examines the Data Encryption Standard (DES) algorithm for encrypting data. DES encrypts 64 bits of data into 56 bits using a secret key. The algorithm uses 16 rounds of complex operations to transform the input data. The output is then split between two blocks to form the encrypted ciphertext. In summary, the document analyzes the DES encryption algorithm for securing user accounts on servers.
Grade 9: Mathematics Unit 2 Quadratic Functions.Paolo Dagaojes
Here are the key points about quadratic functions:
- A quadratic function is a function that can be represented by an equation of the form y = ax2 + bx + c, where a ≠ 0.
- The highest power of the variable x is 2, so the equation is of degree 2.
- Quadratic functions have a parabolic shape when graphed.
- They can model many real-world phenomena like projectile motion, profit, area of shapes, etc.
- Quadratic functions have properties like axis of symmetry, vertex, intercepts, etc. that can be used to analyze and solve problems.
- They can be transformed through translations and stretches/shrinks
The document discusses a mathematics textbook for Grade 10 that was collaboratively developed by educators from various educational institutions in the Philippines. It provides instructions for teachers and other stakeholders to provide feedback and recommendations to the Department of Education. The document also outlines the copyright details and permissions regarding the content in the textbook.
This document provides an introduction to and overview of a learning module on sequences. It outlines two main lessons that will be covered:
1) Arithmetic Sequences - including finding the nth term, next terms, means, and sums of terms
2) Geometric and Other Sequences - including finding the nth term, means, and sums of terms for geometric sequences as well as exploring other types of sequences like harmonic and Fibonacci sequences.
The module will help students learn about different types of sequences, how to analyze and calculate their properties, and apply these concepts to solve real-world problems. A pre-assessment is also included to gauge students' prior knowledge on topics related to sequences.
This document is a motion requesting an extension of the deadline to respond to a supplemental motion for summary judgment. It summarizes that the plaintiff is currently traveling in Europe receiving medical treatment. It requests the court grant an extension until October 31, 2012 to respond to the motion for summary judgment to allow adequate time for the plaintiff's response upon his return.
1. The plaintiff, Traian Bujduveanu, filed a motion for summary judgment in a civil case against Dimas Charteris House and employees Derek Thomas, Lashanda Adams, and Ana Gipert.
2. The plaintiff alleges that while residing at Dimas Charteris House halfway house, a residential reentry center, he was constantly harassed, intimidated, and humiliated without regard to his medical conditions or religious beliefs in violation of his civil rights.
3. Specifically, the plaintiff argues that he was denied religious accommodations, discriminated against due to his religion and national origin, and that his requests for medical documentation were ignored constituting mistreatment.
This document is a motion for summary judgment filed by Plaintiff Traian Duvau in a civil case. It provides 18 pieces of evidence in support of the motion, including medical records, witness statements, and documentation signed by the defendants. If granted, the motion would result in a judgment in favor of the Plaintiff without needing to go to trial.
Palavras Cruzadas sobre homonimos1 respostasDilmara Faria
1. The document is a worksheet with homonyms and paronyms in Portuguese arranged in a crossword puzzle format with clues provided in both horizontal and vertical directions.
2. The clues include words that sound similar but have different meanings or spellings in Portuguese such as "banco" (bench) and "banco" (bank), and words with related or overlapping meanings such as "mandato" (power of attorney) and "mandato" (congressional term).
3. Solving the crossword puzzle requires matching each clue with the correct corresponding word in the grid based on sound and meaning.
This document discusses encryption techniques for securing user accounts on servers. Specifically, it examines the Data Encryption Standard (DES) algorithm for encrypting data. DES encrypts 64 bits of data into 56 bits using a secret key. The algorithm uses 16 rounds of complex operations to transform the input data. The output is then split between two blocks to form the encrypted ciphertext. In summary, the document analyzes the DES encryption algorithm for securing user accounts on servers.
Grade 9: Mathematics Unit 2 Quadratic Functions.Paolo Dagaojes
Here are the key points about quadratic functions:
- A quadratic function is a function that can be represented by an equation of the form y = ax2 + bx + c, where a ≠ 0.
- The highest power of the variable x is 2, so the equation is of degree 2.
- Quadratic functions have a parabolic shape when graphed.
- They can model many real-world phenomena like projectile motion, profit, area of shapes, etc.
- Quadratic functions have properties like axis of symmetry, vertex, intercepts, etc. that can be used to analyze and solve problems.
- They can be transformed through translations and stretches/shrinks
The document discusses a mathematics textbook for Grade 10 that was collaboratively developed by educators from various educational institutions in the Philippines. It provides instructions for teachers and other stakeholders to provide feedback and recommendations to the Department of Education. The document also outlines the copyright details and permissions regarding the content in the textbook.
This document provides an introduction to and overview of a learning module on sequences. It outlines two main lessons that will be covered:
1) Arithmetic Sequences - including finding the nth term, next terms, means, and sums of terms
2) Geometric and Other Sequences - including finding the nth term, means, and sums of terms for geometric sequences as well as exploring other types of sequences like harmonic and Fibonacci sequences.
The module will help students learn about different types of sequences, how to analyze and calculate their properties, and apply these concepts to solve real-world problems. A pre-assessment is also included to gauge students' prior knowledge on topics related to sequences.
This document is a motion requesting an extension of the deadline to respond to a supplemental motion for summary judgment. It summarizes that the plaintiff is currently traveling in Europe receiving medical treatment. It requests the court grant an extension until October 31, 2012 to respond to the motion for summary judgment to allow adequate time for the plaintiff's response upon his return.
This document is a motion requesting permission to travel outside the United States to seek medical treatment. It summarizes the plaintiff's various medical conditions including Hepatitis C, liver cirrhosis, and diabetes. It details recent medical treatment received in Europe and describes a new treatment program in Ukraine. The motion requests the court's permission to travel abroad for this medical care, as the proposed treatment has not been approved by the FDA and is therefore not available in the US.
Memorandum of points and authorities in support of plaintiff's motion for sum...Cocoselul Inaripat
This memorandum supports a motion for summary judgment in a civil case. It argues that the defendant violated the plaintiff's 1st, 5th and 8th Amendment rights by unlawfully imprisoning him without due process and denying him adequate medical care. It asserts that no genuine issues of material fact exist and the plaintiff is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The memorandum contends the defendant's actions were willful, malicious and in violation of federal criminal statutes.
Movant was incarcerated at FDC Miami with various medical conditions including Hepatitis C, diabetes, and chronic fatigue syndrome. While imprisoned, Movant's conditions limited his ability to engage in physical activity and work duties. Movant provided over 1,000 pages of medical records from various healthcare providers to prison officials documenting his medical history and conditions. Defendant was aware of Movant's medical conditions and records but denied him proper medical treatment and caused him to remain imprisoned without consideration for his medical needs.
Memorandum of points and authorities in support of plaintiff's motion for sum...Cocoselul Inaripat
Movant was incarcerated at FDC Miami and diagnosed with several medical conditions including Hepatitis C. Despite his medical issues limiting physical activity, he was required to perform difficult work duties. Movant provided over 1,000 pages of medical records from various hospitals and medical facilities to prison officials documenting his conditions, but defendant disregarded his medical needs.
Movant was incarcerated at FDC Miami with various medical conditions including Hepatitis C, diabetes, and chronic fatigue syndrome. While imprisoned, Movant's conditions limited his ability to engage in physical activity and work duties. Movant provided over 1,000 pages of medical records from various healthcare providers to prison officials documenting his conditions. Defendant was aware of Movant's medical conditions but denied him reasonable accommodations.
Plaintiff's statement of material facts in support of the motion for summary ...Cocoselul Inaripat
1. The plaintiff, Traian Bujoreanu, filed a motion for summary judgment in his case against Dimas Charteris Houseway alleging violations of his civil rights.
2. Bujoreanu claims he was constantly harassed, intimidated, and humiliated during his residency at Dimas Charteris without regard for his medical conditions.
3. He also alleges his requests for religious accommodation were denied and he was discriminated against for his ethnicity and religion.
Plaintiff's statement of material facts in support of the motion for summary ...Cocoselul Inaripat
1. The plaintiff, Traian Bujoreanu, filed a motion for summary judgment in a case against Dimas Charteris Houseway alleging violations of his civil rights during his residency at their halfway house.
2. Bujoreanu claims he was constantly harassed, humiliated, and denied religious freedom without regard for his medical conditions.
3. He provided documentation to support claims of illegal search and seizure of his vehicle, unfair disciplinary actions, and false arrest without due process.
1. The plaintiff, Traian Bujduveanu, filed a motion for summary judgment in a civil case against Dimas Charteris House and employees Derek Thomas, Lashanda Adams, and Ana Gipert.
2. The plaintiff alleges that while residing at Dimas Charteris House halfway house, a residential reentry center, he was constantly harassed, intimidated, and humiliated without regard to his medical conditions or religious beliefs in violation of his civil rights.
3. Specifically, the plaintiff argues that he was denied religious accommodations, discriminated against due to his religion and national origin, and that his requests for medical documentation were ignored constituting mistreatment.
1. The plaintiff filed a motion to supplement their previous motion to compel document production from the defendants.
2. The plaintiff argues that the defendants have withheld important documents and provided vague responses to interrogatories.
3. The plaintiff seeks to compel the defendants to fully respond to discovery requests regarding restrictions on the plaintiff's religious activities while incarcerated at Dania Charters.
Plaintiff's m otio n to supplem en t m otion to com pel second reouest for pr...Cocoselul Inaripat
1. The plaintiff filed a motion to supplement their previous motion to compel document production from the defendants.
2. The plaintiff argues that the defendants have withheld important documents and provided vague responses to interrogatories.
3. The plaintiff seeks to compel the defendants to fully respond to discovery requests regarding restrictions on the plaintiff's religious activities while incarcerated at Dania Charters facility.
Plaintiff's m otio n to supplem en t m otion to com pel second reouest for pr...Cocoselul Inaripat
1. The plaintiff filed a motion to supplement their previous motion to compel production of documents from the defendants.
2. The plaintiff argues that key documents provided by the defendants were incomplete or altered.
3. The plaintiff seeks to compel full disclosure of documents and names of individuals related to the case from the defendants.
1. The plaintiff filed a motion to supplement their previous motion to compel production of documents from the defendants.
2. The plaintiff argues that key documents provided by the defendants were incomplete or altered.
3. The plaintiff seeks to compel full disclosure of documents and names of individuals related to the case from the defendants.
Pl aintiff's m otion to strike defendants' dism as charities,inc., ana gispe...Cocoselul Inaripat
This document is a motion by the plaintiff to strike parts of the defendants' response brief. Specifically, the plaintiff argues that the defendants' brief contains irrelevant statements and fails to provide evidence or details to support their defenses. The motion asserts that the defendants have violated regulations related to halfway house operations and failed to properly investigate and document the alleged violations by the plaintiff. The plaintiff seeks to have parts of the defendants' brief stricken from the record.
Pl aintiff's m otion to strike defendants' dism as charities,inc., ana gispe...Cocoselul Inaripat
This document is a motion by the plaintiff to strike parts of the defendants' response brief. Specifically, the plaintiff argues that the defendants' brief contains irrelevant statements and fails to provide evidence or details to support their defenses. The motion asserts that the defendants have violated regulations related to halfway house operations and failed to properly investigate and document the alleged violations by the plaintiff. The plaintiff seeks to have parts of the defendants' brief stricken from the record.
This document is a motion filed in a federal district court case. The plaintiff argues that the defendants have failed to adequately respond to requests for documents and interrogatories. Specifically, the plaintiff argues that the defendants' responses lack details and documentation to support their claims that the plaintiff violated his halfway house rules. The plaintiff requests that the court strike portions of the defendants' response brief for failing to provide evidence or documentation to back up their statements.
This document is a motion filed in federal district court arguing that the defendants' response brief should be stricken. Specifically, the plaintiff argues that the defendants have failed to provide key details and documentation to support their claims, including dates, names of individuals involved, and records of investigations. The plaintiff also argues that the defendants have violated his civil rights and engaged in harassment. The motion aims to compel full disclosure of records related to the plaintiff's time at a halfway house and his transfer to a detention center.
1. The plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment in their case against defendants Charles Smith, Derek Thomas, and Lashanda Adams.
2. The motion provides 17 pieces of evidence including medical records, signed documents, witness statements, and admissions to support that the defendants violated the plaintiff's rights.
3. The evidence shows the plaintiff's medical conditions, the denial of medical services, and that the home confinement terms were not followed.
This document is a motion for summary judgment filed by Plaintiff Traian Duvau in a civil case. It provides 18 pieces of evidence supporting the motion, including medical records, witness statements, and documentation signed by the defendants. The evidence aims to show that the plaintiff's constitutional rights were violated during his incarceration at FDC Miami, and that the defendants knew of his medical conditions but denied him access to medical services. The plaintiff requests summary judgment on all claims based on this evidence.
This document is a motion for summary judgment filed by Plaintiff Traian Duvau in a civil case. It provides 18 pieces of evidence in support of the motion, including medical records, witness statements, and documentation signed by the defendants. If granted, the motion would result in a judgment in favor of the Plaintiff without needing to go to trial.
This document is the plaintiff's response to the defendant's supplemental motion for summary judgment in a civil case. It summarizes the plaintiff's allegations against the defendant halfway house for violating the terms of his home confinement by restricting his phone access. The response argues that granting summary judgment for the defendant would be inappropriate given the factual disputes between the parties. It maintains that the halfway house imposed unauthorized conditions on the plaintiff's phone use beyond what was agreed to in his home confinement agreement.
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Justice System,Election of Criminals into the US Federal Government Offices,The Most Corrupted Country In the World,Democracy Propaganda
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Justice System,Election of Criminals into the US Federal Government Offices,The Most Corrupted Country In the World,Democracy Propaganda
This document is a motion requesting permission to travel outside the United States to seek medical treatment. It summarizes the plaintiff's various medical conditions including Hepatitis C, liver cirrhosis, and diabetes. It details recent medical treatment received in Europe and describes a new treatment program in Ukraine. The motion requests the court's permission to travel abroad for this medical care, as the proposed treatment has not been approved by the FDA and is therefore not available in the US.
Memorandum of points and authorities in support of plaintiff's motion for sum...Cocoselul Inaripat
This memorandum supports a motion for summary judgment in a civil case. It argues that the defendant violated the plaintiff's 1st, 5th and 8th Amendment rights by unlawfully imprisoning him without due process and denying him adequate medical care. It asserts that no genuine issues of material fact exist and the plaintiff is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The memorandum contends the defendant's actions were willful, malicious and in violation of federal criminal statutes.
Movant was incarcerated at FDC Miami with various medical conditions including Hepatitis C, diabetes, and chronic fatigue syndrome. While imprisoned, Movant's conditions limited his ability to engage in physical activity and work duties. Movant provided over 1,000 pages of medical records from various healthcare providers to prison officials documenting his medical history and conditions. Defendant was aware of Movant's medical conditions and records but denied him proper medical treatment and caused him to remain imprisoned without consideration for his medical needs.
Memorandum of points and authorities in support of plaintiff's motion for sum...Cocoselul Inaripat
Movant was incarcerated at FDC Miami and diagnosed with several medical conditions including Hepatitis C. Despite his medical issues limiting physical activity, he was required to perform difficult work duties. Movant provided over 1,000 pages of medical records from various hospitals and medical facilities to prison officials documenting his conditions, but defendant disregarded his medical needs.
Movant was incarcerated at FDC Miami with various medical conditions including Hepatitis C, diabetes, and chronic fatigue syndrome. While imprisoned, Movant's conditions limited his ability to engage in physical activity and work duties. Movant provided over 1,000 pages of medical records from various healthcare providers to prison officials documenting his conditions. Defendant was aware of Movant's medical conditions but denied him reasonable accommodations.
Plaintiff's statement of material facts in support of the motion for summary ...Cocoselul Inaripat
1. The plaintiff, Traian Bujoreanu, filed a motion for summary judgment in his case against Dimas Charteris Houseway alleging violations of his civil rights.
2. Bujoreanu claims he was constantly harassed, intimidated, and humiliated during his residency at Dimas Charteris without regard for his medical conditions.
3. He also alleges his requests for religious accommodation were denied and he was discriminated against for his ethnicity and religion.
Plaintiff's statement of material facts in support of the motion for summary ...Cocoselul Inaripat
1. The plaintiff, Traian Bujoreanu, filed a motion for summary judgment in a case against Dimas Charteris Houseway alleging violations of his civil rights during his residency at their halfway house.
2. Bujoreanu claims he was constantly harassed, humiliated, and denied religious freedom without regard for his medical conditions.
3. He provided documentation to support claims of illegal search and seizure of his vehicle, unfair disciplinary actions, and false arrest without due process.
1. The plaintiff, Traian Bujduveanu, filed a motion for summary judgment in a civil case against Dimas Charteris House and employees Derek Thomas, Lashanda Adams, and Ana Gipert.
2. The plaintiff alleges that while residing at Dimas Charteris House halfway house, a residential reentry center, he was constantly harassed, intimidated, and humiliated without regard to his medical conditions or religious beliefs in violation of his civil rights.
3. Specifically, the plaintiff argues that he was denied religious accommodations, discriminated against due to his religion and national origin, and that his requests for medical documentation were ignored constituting mistreatment.
1. The plaintiff filed a motion to supplement their previous motion to compel document production from the defendants.
2. The plaintiff argues that the defendants have withheld important documents and provided vague responses to interrogatories.
3. The plaintiff seeks to compel the defendants to fully respond to discovery requests regarding restrictions on the plaintiff's religious activities while incarcerated at Dania Charters.
Plaintiff's m otio n to supplem en t m otion to com pel second reouest for pr...Cocoselul Inaripat
1. The plaintiff filed a motion to supplement their previous motion to compel document production from the defendants.
2. The plaintiff argues that the defendants have withheld important documents and provided vague responses to interrogatories.
3. The plaintiff seeks to compel the defendants to fully respond to discovery requests regarding restrictions on the plaintiff's religious activities while incarcerated at Dania Charters facility.
Plaintiff's m otio n to supplem en t m otion to com pel second reouest for pr...Cocoselul Inaripat
1. The plaintiff filed a motion to supplement their previous motion to compel production of documents from the defendants.
2. The plaintiff argues that key documents provided by the defendants were incomplete or altered.
3. The plaintiff seeks to compel full disclosure of documents and names of individuals related to the case from the defendants.
1. The plaintiff filed a motion to supplement their previous motion to compel production of documents from the defendants.
2. The plaintiff argues that key documents provided by the defendants were incomplete or altered.
3. The plaintiff seeks to compel full disclosure of documents and names of individuals related to the case from the defendants.
Pl aintiff's m otion to strike defendants' dism as charities,inc., ana gispe...Cocoselul Inaripat
This document is a motion by the plaintiff to strike parts of the defendants' response brief. Specifically, the plaintiff argues that the defendants' brief contains irrelevant statements and fails to provide evidence or details to support their defenses. The motion asserts that the defendants have violated regulations related to halfway house operations and failed to properly investigate and document the alleged violations by the plaintiff. The plaintiff seeks to have parts of the defendants' brief stricken from the record.
Pl aintiff's m otion to strike defendants' dism as charities,inc., ana gispe...Cocoselul Inaripat
This document is a motion by the plaintiff to strike parts of the defendants' response brief. Specifically, the plaintiff argues that the defendants' brief contains irrelevant statements and fails to provide evidence or details to support their defenses. The motion asserts that the defendants have violated regulations related to halfway house operations and failed to properly investigate and document the alleged violations by the plaintiff. The plaintiff seeks to have parts of the defendants' brief stricken from the record.
This document is a motion filed in a federal district court case. The plaintiff argues that the defendants have failed to adequately respond to requests for documents and interrogatories. Specifically, the plaintiff argues that the defendants' responses lack details and documentation to support their claims that the plaintiff violated his halfway house rules. The plaintiff requests that the court strike portions of the defendants' response brief for failing to provide evidence or documentation to back up their statements.
This document is a motion filed in federal district court arguing that the defendants' response brief should be stricken. Specifically, the plaintiff argues that the defendants have failed to provide key details and documentation to support their claims, including dates, names of individuals involved, and records of investigations. The plaintiff also argues that the defendants have violated his civil rights and engaged in harassment. The motion aims to compel full disclosure of records related to the plaintiff's time at a halfway house and his transfer to a detention center.
1. The plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment in their case against defendants Charles Smith, Derek Thomas, and Lashanda Adams.
2. The motion provides 17 pieces of evidence including medical records, signed documents, witness statements, and admissions to support that the defendants violated the plaintiff's rights.
3. The evidence shows the plaintiff's medical conditions, the denial of medical services, and that the home confinement terms were not followed.
This document is a motion for summary judgment filed by Plaintiff Traian Duvau in a civil case. It provides 18 pieces of evidence supporting the motion, including medical records, witness statements, and documentation signed by the defendants. The evidence aims to show that the plaintiff's constitutional rights were violated during his incarceration at FDC Miami, and that the defendants knew of his medical conditions but denied him access to medical services. The plaintiff requests summary judgment on all claims based on this evidence.
This document is a motion for summary judgment filed by Plaintiff Traian Duvau in a civil case. It provides 18 pieces of evidence in support of the motion, including medical records, witness statements, and documentation signed by the defendants. If granted, the motion would result in a judgment in favor of the Plaintiff without needing to go to trial.
This document is the plaintiff's response to the defendant's supplemental motion for summary judgment in a civil case. It summarizes the plaintiff's allegations against the defendant halfway house for violating the terms of his home confinement by restricting his phone access. The response argues that granting summary judgment for the defendant would be inappropriate given the factual disputes between the parties. It maintains that the halfway house imposed unauthorized conditions on the plaintiff's phone use beyond what was agreed to in his home confinement agreement.
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Justice System,Election of Criminals into the US Federal Government Offices,The Most Corrupted Country In the World,Democracy Propaganda
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Justice System,Election of Criminals into the US Federal Government Offices,The Most Corrupted Country In the World,Democracy Propaganda
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Justice System,Election of Criminals into the US Federal Government Offices,The Most Corrupted Country In the World,Democracy Propaganda
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Justice System,Election of Criminals into the US Federal Government Offices,The Most Corrupted Country In the World,Democracy Propaganda
The document discusses the results of a study on the effects of exercise on memory and thinking abilities in older adults. The study found that regular exercise can help reduce the decline in thinking abilities that often occurs with age. Older adults who exercised regularly performed better on cognitive tests and brain scans showed they had greater activity in important areas for memory and learning compared to less active peers.
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Justice System,Election of Criminals into the US Federal Government Offices,The Most Corrupted Country In the World,Democracy Propaganda
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Justice System,Election of Criminals into the US Federal Government Offices,The Most Corrupted Country In the World,Democracy Propaganda
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Justice System,Election of Criminals into the US Federal Government Offices,The Most Corrupted Country In the World,Democracy Propaganda
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Justice System,Election of Criminals into the US Federal Government Offices,The Most Corrupted Country In the World,Democracy Propaganda
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Just...Cocoselul Inaripat
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Justice System,Election of Criminals into the US Federal Government Offices,The Most Corrupted Country In the World,Democracy Propaganda
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Justice System,Election of Criminals into the US Federal Government Offices,The Most Corrupted Country In the World,Democracy Propaganda
Traian Bujduveani 1,Corruption inside US Government,Corruption of the US Justice System,Election of Crominals into the US Federal Government Offices,The Most Corrupted Country In the World
The United States government conducted a large raid involving over 30 agents from numerous agencies on Traian Bujduveanu's residence to seize assets. The lead prosecutors claimed in court that the assets were worth over $100,000, but they ended up being less than $10,000 in value, consisting of antique aircraft parts. The massive raid was unnecessary and terrorized Bujduveanu's 84-year-old blind mother, who was sent to the hospital. Witnesses state that Bujduveanu had been under surveillance for over a year before the raid. The government's actions seem aimed at justifying the expenses of the investigation rather than appropriately addressing the matter.
This document lists the names of various government agencies and individuals, including Jeb Bush, the Department of Justice, ICE agents, US Attorneys, Assistant Attorney Generals, FBI agents, and others. It also references concepts like government conspiracies, revolutions in Romania and Iran, corruption in government, and crimes against humanity.
1. Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 118 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/21/2012 Page 1 of 7
I THE UNI
N TED STATES DI STRI CO URT FOR
CT *
THE SOUTHERN DI STRI OF FLO RI A
CT D
CASE NO. II ZOIZO- V- TZ/ M ONTON
: - CI SEI SI FI by
LED D.
C.
'
(
TRM AN BUJDUVEAN U, '
At 2 2 1
lo 02 i
# :
7
Pli it
antfl
1 SEE MUR OE j
j
t TVN sII R .
k
5
-
z M
VS. 1 CE.j jVC. ,
t 11jtu S g u
k LO o .T T
i K
q
,,:..-
..-.-
, -
jj
DI AS CHARI ES,l ,
SM TI NC.ANA GISPERT,
DEREK THOM AS a ADAM S LESHOTA
nd
Def nda s
e nt .
/
PLM NTI S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS'M OTI TO STRI E
FF' ON K
PLAI TI S PO CK ET :NTRI 114 AND 1
N FF' ES 15
COM ES NOW TR AI BUJDUVEANU , Pr Se a fl t sM oton i r pons
AN o , nd ie hi i n es e
t De e nt M o i To Sti Pl i ifsDoc Entis 1l a 1l a f l :
o f nda s' ton rke antf ket re 4 nd 5 s olows
I TR OD UC TI N
N O
1 De e nt ha fld a M oto i a a tm ptt c nc t s Cour t srke
. f nda s ve ie i n n n te o onvi e hi t o ti
Pl ntc sdoc e sDE# 11 a DE# 11 , ale ng non- ompla eoft Pl ntf
ai i um nt 4 nd 5 lgi c inc he ai if
w ih Loc Rul oft s Cour .
t al es hi t
Def nda s c e t ttl co ve i oft Rul ofCi lPr ed le a
e nt ontnds ha tn nka nton he es vi oc tr nd
Loca Rul ,Pl ntf i o ry fld a Re po e bre t Defnda s Re y Bref
l es ai if mpr pe l ie s ns if o e nt ' pl i
,
( 1 4 a a S p lme a M oin i Repo e ( 1 5 Thes bref do not
DE# 1 ) nd u p e ntl to n s ns DE# 1 ) e i s.
r ieany ne is f t sCo tt c i r
as w s ue or hi ur o onsde .
I f tt De e nt a e a ki t sCour t srkePl ntf ' M oton DE# 11
n ac he f nda s r s ng hi t o ti ai ifs i 4
2. Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 118 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/21/2012 Page 2 of 7
a DE# 11 smpl be us i s emsi nve e a i brngss m e oft tut of
nd 5, i y ca e t e nco nint nd t i o he r h
t s c e t t s f e,t s tme by doc e s is d by t Unied St t s Fede a
hi as o he urac hi i um nt s ue he t ae rl
Go m me ,a i i no l r a s r tt tt Defnda smade s r f le a
ve nt nd t s onge ec e ha he e nt eve al a s nd
mil a ng sa e nt t t sCour.I t ebre sr ieanyne is f rt scour i
se di tt me s o hi t f hos if a s w s ue o hi ts
f t Cotr t c i rand nott D e e nt .
or he tt o ons de he f nda s
FACTS OF THI CASE
S
4.0n Ma c 1 , 2 Unie S a e DititJ g P tii A. et ha Or ra
r h 5 201 , t d t t s src ud e a rca S iz s de s
f l s ' ' pa tess lc e a notf t Co tno lt t an M a c 21 201
olow ; f he ri hal onf r nd iy he ur
-
l aer h r h , 2,
whet rt y co e t f a diposton oft sm a trby M a sr t J
he he ns nt o m l s ii hi te gita e udge Si o on.
m nt
Ata he h r t i t f r t ep riss o l e c t a dfl b ta d t. ( 98
tc d e eo s he o m h a t h ud xe ue n ie y h t ae' DE# )
e '
By sgni t sf m ,t pari ha agr d i f t f om t tm e on,
i ng hi or he tes ve ee n act hat r hat i
t M agitat J
he sr e udge Andr M .Si ont wilpr i overt s Cas a t
ea m on l esde hi e, nd hat
s woul be i t pos ton t m a a deci i r ga di t scas
he d n he ii o ke ny sons e r ng hi e.
6. 0n M a 21 201 Unied St es m a sr t J
y , 2 t at gi t a e udge Andr M .Si ont n r e a
ea m o ul d s
f l :t RDER ED A N p A DJU PG ED t Pl ntf Moton f Leave t
olows A hat ai ifs i or o
Extend Ti t Respond t Def
me o o endant Suppl ent M oton f Sum mar
s' em al i or y
J gmen ( # 1 4) i GOANTED. Pl n i s l fl hs r p e t
ud t DE 0 s aitf hal i i es ons o
f e
De en t 'Suppl t Mo i f Summar J
f dan s emen al t or
on y udgment( # 1 on or
DE 03)
bef e Jul 2,201 l i f t
or y 2. t s urher ORDERED t t Or Seti TralDat
hat he der tng i e,
Pr ti Dea iesan Re eralo Ma sr t ( # 4 i VACATED.)
er al dl n d f r t gita e DE 4)s ''
2
3. Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 118 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/21/2012 Page 3 of 7
On or a ut J y 1 201 m a l s r or t ac e s e f m of J tc ,
bo ul 5, 2, s a t es t o hi ve om or us i e
Pl i if fl d a Subpoe wih t Unie St t s Diti Co q Fede a Bur u of
antf ie na t he t d a e srct ur r l ea
Prs Ce r l Ofke,W as ngt DC,Unied St t s Fe r Bur a of Prs ,
ions nta t hi on t a e de al e u ions
Regi l O fk e, G e gi , FD C M i m i Unie St t s Pr ton O fi e, M i mi
ona t or a a , td a e oba i fc a ,
Unied St t s M arha Se v c s M im i CCM M im i a Dim a Cha ii sl t
t ae s l r ie , a , a , nd s s rte ,nc o
Comm a t m t Pr uc Doc e s c es of a 1 Enty Fo ms Repors a
nd he o od e um nt opi 1 r r , t nd
Doc nt 9om t Se r Syse ( 11 Exhi t 1 2,3,4 , 6)
ume s he nty tm. DE# 0, bis , 5,
On or about Augus 07,2012,i r pons t t Subpoena fl by t
t n es e o he ied he
Pl i if Unied St t Asss ant Atorney,Ant
a ntf, t a es it t hony Pogor l ki has s t
ze s ent he
Pl ntf a r
ai if eport pr nt fom t Senty Sys e r vealng w ha i f t t
i ed r he r tm e i t n ac he
Pl ntf w asal a s yi t the neverha ahearnghel by t Unied S a es
ai if w ys a ng, ha d i d he t t t
Feder Bur ofPr s USPO,
al eau i on, Com m uniy S vi Cent ,nsde orout i t
t er ce er i i s de he
prs asr r d byt UniedSt esDepart
ion, equie he t at mentofJ tce Feder Bur au of
usi , al e
Prs s ( # 11 , x bi aa B)
ion . DE 5 E hi t nd
9. Thi r
s epor a s i c est tDef ndant ha m adeFa s and M il di
t l o ndiat ha e s ve le s ea ng
s t entt t sCour and t f tt t Unied St t Pr
m em o hi k he ac hat he t a es obaton Ofie
i fc
S a e e r r ng t f tt t y w e e notaw a e oft si i . n f tt
t t m nt ega di he ac hat he r r hi nc dent I ac he
USPO f
oundoutaboutt si dentfom t Pl ntf,nJ
hi nci ,r he ai ifi anuar 2011, t t
y, afer he
Pl ntf w asr eas f om FDC Mi iThi is a s c becl rby a
ai if el ed r am . s s ue l o an ea n
i stgaton,i t sCourti c
nve i i f hi s once ned w ih t TRUTH i t sc e.
r t he n hi as
4. Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 118 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/21/2012 Page 4 of 7
ARGUM ENT
l i no cl ri i t Def nda sa e co e n wih t Loca Rul oft s Co t
t s t ea s f he e nt r nc r t he l es hi ur
o i t y a e a r d t t a 1 t f le a mil a ng sae e s as we l as t
r f he r fai ha 1 he a s nd se di t tm nt l he
de % cto ofe de a f brc ton ofne e de e i t s ca e wilco e i o
s in vi nce nd a ia i w vi nc n hi s l m nt
lghta s
i s hown by t Gove n e Doc e s a tc pr vi usy,t
he r m nt um nt ta hed e o l DE# 1 s, bi
l Exhi t
A a dB)a doh re itn d c me t.
n n te x si g o u ns
1 Eve y tm e t tPl i ifbrngsa gu e si t sCa e, t ts e si nve e
0. r i ha antf i r m nt n hi s ha e m nco nint
t t Def nda s t Def nds sa k t sCour t Sti t Pli ifsM o i a i
o he e nt , he e nt s hi t o rke he antf ton s f
t D e e nt woul be i c m a a t s Co t Thi i a he t tc of t
he f nda s d n om nd t hi ur . s s not r aci he
Def nt t i pe t J tce Pr e s a t s Cour s ul be a tntve t t s
enda s o m d he usi oc s , nd hi t ho d te i o hi
sr egy.
tat
11. The Evi nc i cla i t s c s . I was D e e Thom as a t r t of t
de e s e r n hi a e t rk nd he es he
De enda s t tca e t Pl i if t be s ntt t Fe r Prs n a N OT t
f nt ha us d he antf o e o he de al io nd he
Fe a Govem me a no t f aroft t t co i t t s f cewilmaket
der l nt nd w he e he nzh m ng o he ura l he
De e nt t l f r m itke i Loc Rul Fii i a hope t t Pl ntf
f nda s o ook o sa s n al es lng n ha ai irs
M otonswilbesrkeby t sCour and t r wilbe no f rhe a
i l ti hi t he e l u t r ppea soft sc s .
l hi a e
12. UniedSt esMar Ser ce wer c l t ares Tr an Buj
t at shal vi s e aled o r t ai duveanuas
hewasdecar a f tveby t Def
l ed ugii he endant . Subs que l t Pl ntf w as
s e nty, he ai if
r oved f om t pr s ofDi m asChartesl , t ans t t FDC
em r he emi es s ii , nc.and r pored o
Mi i
am .
13. Afe t adm i i oft Pl ntf atFDC M i ihewaspl ed i Gener
t r he sson he ai if am ac n al
Popul i Uni 7 Eas .
at on t t
4
5. Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 118 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/21/2012 Page 5 of 7
14. Seen t t Pl tf w as pl ed atFD C M i iil , tm anager M s. i e
hat he ai if ac am legal Uni Pr c
be c lng CCM M i i as ng f t Di t CarosRodrguez and Dim as
gan ali am , ki or he rec or l i , s
Charii ,I .as ng f t Diec orAna Gi pertDes t s ve alc l, hos
tes nc, ki or he r t s . pie e r als t e
peopl neverans ert phone, vi ot peopl ans ert phoneand
e w he ha ng her e w he
invoki varousr ons Thi i s sc be cear up sm pl by t sCour
ng i eas . s s ue an l ed i y hi t
i s ngand Or f an i s i i oft
s ui der or nve tgaton hoseafais
f r.
As wih a s rous s ncton,t s ndi oft Pl ntf bac t t Fe r l
t ny e i a i he e ng he ai if k o he de a
Phs s ul ha be n a o d by CCA USPO a Commt t Sa tons
on ho d ve e ppr ve 4, nd miy nc i
Re e e a i s a di t e by t r es oft Fede a Bur a ofPr s .l addii
pr s nt tve s c at d he ul he rl e u ions n ton,
nohe rng ofa ki wer e rhe d i t pr s nc oft Pli ifby CCM ,
ai ny nd e ve l n he e e e he a ntf USPO,
Di m a Cha ii ,nc. or Com m t iy Sa tons Re e e a i a r uie by t
s s rtesl , m t nc i pr s nt tves s eq r d he
r gul i
e atons of t Fe r l Bur u of Prs . Thos hea i
he de a ea i ons e rngs f r V i a i
o ol tons of
Pr a Rul s d be ha e t mee t ç
ogr m es houl ndld o t he ç pr es ' c ie i of W olf v.
due oc s' rt ra f
M cDonal No ka e ofs h a ova e ssi t Se r Syse o any Unied St es
d. c uc ppr l xit n he nty t m r t at
Gove m e doc e or any ta of a t of l ga hea i co uc e by t
m nt um nt r ce ny ype e l rng nd t d he
Fede alBur u ofPrs nsi i orouti t prs
r ea io ,nsde sde he ion.
1 Pl ntf i as ng t sCour t l a t Rul s oft Fede a Btr a ofPr s
3. ai i f s ki hi t o ook t he e he r l le u i ons
a i t y s m si onve e t a pa t a tsm o e ,t is Or r t modiy
nd f he ee nc nint o ny ry t i m nt o s ue de s o f
t s rze as t Fede a Cour ha t powe t do s Prs r s d no be
he e tls he rl t s he r o o. ione s houl t
oblga e t sa be we n t e who m a t r es t have i bot wa ,ort be
i t d o t nd t e hos ke he ul , o t h ys o
t r u e m e a l a phys c l by pr va e i tm to i t na e of t Unied
o t r d nt ly nd i aly i t nsi i ns n he m he t
St esFederalGovernm ent wihouta hope f J tce.
at , t ny or us i
5
6. Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 118 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/21/2012 Page 6 of 7
Dee
f ndant ha vi a e e r Rul I The book,ye t y s m t w i a1 t
s ve ol t d ve y e n t he ee o n 1 he
tm e Pl ntf ho s t tG od wils veus9om t e t a e hi i be nd r lgi n.
i . ai i f pe ha l a bos hat r d ng hi e i o
1 Atpr enttme CounseorLashondaYve t Adams andCounseorJ r ar
5. es i , l te , l er y e
no l
ongerem pl
oyed by Di
smasChartes I . y ha bee fr al w ih
ii , nc The ve n ied ong t
ot em pl
her oyeesby Diec orAna Gi per,i an atem ptt cover up m uc oft
r t s tn t o - h he
t ut i t s c e.
r h n hi as
CONCLUSI N
O
For t r
he easons setf t above,t Pl ntf oul m ove t s Courtf an Order t
or h he ai ifw d hi or o
hel De e
d f ndane r ponsbl f i
es i e or mpedi t J tc Pr e si t sCour ,a nt
ng he us ie oc s n hi t ppoi
an i
ndepende c m i s on t i t g e al c i i a t c
nt om s i o nves i at l r m nal c s onduc ed at Di m a
t s s
Chartes I .and f any f t rr i t Cour de j tand pr r
ii , nc, or urhe elef he ' ems us
t ope .
D a e:A ugus 1 201
t t 6, 2
Res ctu l s
pe f ly ubmit
ted,
> , /
AN
v , U PRO m LIs/ T
D
A vSE TIG /
RA I BU J U VE AN
5601W . owa d Bl ,
Br r vd.
Pl nt to FL 3331
a a i n, 7
( 31 38
954) 6- 28
6
7. Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 118 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/21/2012 Page 7 of 7
CERTI CATE O F SERVI
FI CE
lhe e c r iy t on ora
r by e tf hat boutA U GU ST 1 201 a t u a c r c c oft
6, 2 r e nd or e t opy he
f e ng doc e wass r e upo t f l wi vi t Unie St esPosa
or goi um nt e v d n he olo ng a he td at tl
Se vce Fis Cl s M a l
r i , r t a s i:
DismasChartes I ,
ii , nc.
141 N. .1 St Avenue
W .
Dani FL 33004-
a, 2835
Ana Gi per
s t
Di m as Char t e ,nc
s ii s l .
141 N. .1 St Avenue
W .
Dani FL 33004-
a, 2835
Der Thom as
ek
Di m as Char t es l .
s ii ,nc
141 N. .1 St Avenue
W .
Dani FL 33004-
a, 2835
LashandaAdam s
Di m asChartesl .
s ii ,nc
141 N. .1 S .
W t Avenue
Dani , 33004-
a FL 2835
Davi S.
d ChaietEs r
qui e
At or y f Def
t ne or endant s
4000 Holyw ood Boul d
l evar
Suie 265-
t South
Holywood,FL 33021
l
EXECUTED ON THI 16t DAY OF AUGUST,2012
S h
M . /
/Q z
z z / //
zwm ,/
TRAI BUJ
AN DUVE NU,PR0 SE
5601W .BROW ARD BLVD.
,
PI NTATI FL 33317
A ON,
( 4 316 38
95 ) - 28