1. Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 108 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/21/2012 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO. 11-20120-CIV-SEITZ/SIMONTON
Consent Case
TRAIAN BUJDUVEANU,
Plaintiff,
v.
ANA GINSPERT, et al.,
Defendants.
/
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION
OF TIME AND VACATING SCHEDULING ORDER
This matter is before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Extend Time to
Respond to Defendants’ Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment (DE # 104).
Defendants have filed no response. The Honorable Patricia A. Seitz, United States
District Judge, has referred this case to the undersigned Magistrate Judge with respect
to all further proceedings (DE # 100).
Defendants filed their Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment (DE # 103) on
April 12, 2012, and a response was due April 30, 2012. Plaintiff seeks to have until June
30, 2012, to file a response to Defendants’ Supplemental Motion.1 Plaintiff explains that
the death of his mother, as well as his own personal health issues, have delayed his
response to Defendants’ Supplemental Motion. Plaintiff’s Motion appears to be
unopposed since Defendants have not filed a response, and the deadline for doing so
has passed. Noting no opposition to the requested relief, and raising none sua sponte,
the undersigned grants Plaintiff’s Motion.
The granting of Plaintiff’s Motion, however, requires vacating the scheduling order
in this case, which establishes certain dates and deadlines regarding the trial and pretrial
1
The undersigned notes that June 30, 2012, falls on a Saturday. July 2, 2012, is the
following Monday.

2. Case 1:11-cv-20120-AMS Document 108 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/21/2012 Page 2 of 2
matters. This is necessary in order for the Court to consider the parties’ Motions for
Summary Judgment, as well as other motions pending before the Court, before
proceeding to trial. Therefore, the current scheduling order contained in the Order
Setting Trial Date, Pretrial Deadlines and Referral to Magistrate (DE # 44) is hereby
vacated. A new scheduling order will be entered as necessary, after the Court has
addressed the pending Motions for Summary Judgment. Therefore, for the reasons
stated above, it is hereby
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Extend Time to
Respond to Defendants’ Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment (DE # 104) is
GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file his response to Defendants’ Supplemental Motion for
Summary Judgment (DE # 103) on or before July 2, 2012. It is further
ORDERED that the Order Setting Trial Date, Pretrial Deadlines and Referral to
Magistrate (DE # 44) is VACATED.
DONE AND ORDERED at Miami, Florida, on May 21, 2012.
__________________________________
ANDREA M. SIMONTON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Copies furnished to:
All counsel of record
2