This presentation was made jointly by Brisbane Family Law Centre Director, Clarissa Rayward, and mediator Jenny Rimmer, of JDR Solutions.
The presentation was made on behalf of the Family Law Practitioners Association of Queensland, in May 2012.
This presentation was made jointly by Brisbane Family Law Centre Director, Clarissa Rayward, and mediator Jenny Rimmer, of JDR Solutions.
The presentation was made on behalf of the Family Law Practitioners Association of Queensland, in May 2012.
CONTOH MOOTING OLEH PELAJAR TAHUN AKHIR DI UUMASMAH CHE WAN
Appeal on criminal case which is a rape case. we are acting on behalf of appellant (accused). This case was based on real situation in the case of Azahan bin Aminallah v PP.
Hayden Fisher "false and misleading" answers in US Courtswanmail
The Court concludes that Fisher should be sanctioned for his reprehensible conduct. The minimum appropriate sanction sufficient to deter repetition of such conduct in the future is the denial of Fisher’s Application. Fisher will not be permitted to practice before this Court.
The Court finds Fisher’s conscious decision to withhold information concerning the public reprimand violated the duty of candor Fisher owed to the Court.* The certification made by Fisher in his Application was materially incorrect. It was both false and misleading.
*Rule 3.3(a)(1) of the Virginia Rules of Professional Conduct provides: “A lawyer shall not knowingly: (1) make a false statement of fact or law to a tribunal.”
Judgment is a decision of a court regarding the rights and liabilities of parties in a legal action or proceeding. Judgments also generally provide the court's explanation of why it has chosen to make a particular court order.
when all the facts of a case are heard, and a judge or jury makes the final decision about the court case. An offender can waive their rights to a jury trial and just have the judge make the ruling in a bench trial.
In the Application, Fisher certified to the Court that he had “not been reprimanded in any court nor ha[d] there been any action in any court pertaining to [his] conduct or fitness as a member of the bar.” Upon review of the Application, the Court took judicial notice of the fact that Fisher had been publicly reprimanded on January 30, 2014 under procedures established in Part Six, § IV, ¶ 13-15.B.4 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia. In the Matter of Douglass Hayden Fisher, VSB Docket No. 13-032-094098 (3d. District Subcommittee, Sec. II 2014). The Virginia State Bar entered its reprimand of Fisher after two hearings conducted on
December 20, 2013 and January 23, 2014. The Virginia State Bar found that Fisher had violated several Virginia Rules of Professional Conduct. Specifically, the Virginia State Bar found that Fisher had violated rules pertaining to diligence, communication, safekeeping of property, and declining or terminating representation. Fisher did not appeal the reprimand to the Supreme Court of Virginia. See Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia, Part VI, § IV, ¶13-26.
It was so important and prudent to include a right to reasonable bail in the Bill of Rights because bail is inherently intertwined with a defendant's right to innocence until proven guilty. A person should have the right to be released on bail while preparing for their trial.
The formal appearance of an accused person to hear, and to receive a copy of, the charge against him or her, in the presence of a judge, and to then enter a plea of guilty or not guilty.
ORDER
(Contempt ofCourt for Failure to Appear)
THIS MATTER is before the Court on a rule requiring Counsel for Plaintiff, Douglass Hayden Fisher, Esquire, to show cause why he should not be held in Contempt of Court for failure to appear before the Court for an Initial Pretrial Conference, which occurred on July 10, 2014. A copy ofthe rule was personally served on Counsel for Plaintiff by the U.S. Marshal.
At the show cause hearing on August 5, 2014, the Court held Counsel for Plaintiff in CONTEMPT OF COURT and ORDERED Counsel for Plaintiff to pay a $200 fine
within ten (10) days ofthe date ofthis Order. Payment SHALL be made to the Clerk, U.S. District Court
CONTOH MOOTING OLEH PELAJAR TAHUN AKHIR DI UUMASMAH CHE WAN
Appeal on criminal case which is a rape case. we are acting on behalf of appellant (accused). This case was based on real situation in the case of Azahan bin Aminallah v PP.
Hayden Fisher "false and misleading" answers in US Courtswanmail
The Court concludes that Fisher should be sanctioned for his reprehensible conduct. The minimum appropriate sanction sufficient to deter repetition of such conduct in the future is the denial of Fisher’s Application. Fisher will not be permitted to practice before this Court.
The Court finds Fisher’s conscious decision to withhold information concerning the public reprimand violated the duty of candor Fisher owed to the Court.* The certification made by Fisher in his Application was materially incorrect. It was both false and misleading.
*Rule 3.3(a)(1) of the Virginia Rules of Professional Conduct provides: “A lawyer shall not knowingly: (1) make a false statement of fact or law to a tribunal.”
Judgment is a decision of a court regarding the rights and liabilities of parties in a legal action or proceeding. Judgments also generally provide the court's explanation of why it has chosen to make a particular court order.
when all the facts of a case are heard, and a judge or jury makes the final decision about the court case. An offender can waive their rights to a jury trial and just have the judge make the ruling in a bench trial.
In the Application, Fisher certified to the Court that he had “not been reprimanded in any court nor ha[d] there been any action in any court pertaining to [his] conduct or fitness as a member of the bar.” Upon review of the Application, the Court took judicial notice of the fact that Fisher had been publicly reprimanded on January 30, 2014 under procedures established in Part Six, § IV, ¶ 13-15.B.4 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia. In the Matter of Douglass Hayden Fisher, VSB Docket No. 13-032-094098 (3d. District Subcommittee, Sec. II 2014). The Virginia State Bar entered its reprimand of Fisher after two hearings conducted on
December 20, 2013 and January 23, 2014. The Virginia State Bar found that Fisher had violated several Virginia Rules of Professional Conduct. Specifically, the Virginia State Bar found that Fisher had violated rules pertaining to diligence, communication, safekeeping of property, and declining or terminating representation. Fisher did not appeal the reprimand to the Supreme Court of Virginia. See Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia, Part VI, § IV, ¶13-26.
It was so important and prudent to include a right to reasonable bail in the Bill of Rights because bail is inherently intertwined with a defendant's right to innocence until proven guilty. A person should have the right to be released on bail while preparing for their trial.
The formal appearance of an accused person to hear, and to receive a copy of, the charge against him or her, in the presence of a judge, and to then enter a plea of guilty or not guilty.
ORDER
(Contempt ofCourt for Failure to Appear)
THIS MATTER is before the Court on a rule requiring Counsel for Plaintiff, Douglass Hayden Fisher, Esquire, to show cause why he should not be held in Contempt of Court for failure to appear before the Court for an Initial Pretrial Conference, which occurred on July 10, 2014. A copy ofthe rule was personally served on Counsel for Plaintiff by the U.S. Marshal.
At the show cause hearing on August 5, 2014, the Court held Counsel for Plaintiff in CONTEMPT OF COURT and ORDERED Counsel for Plaintiff to pay a $200 fine
within ten (10) days ofthe date ofthis Order. Payment SHALL be made to the Clerk, U.S. District Court
This presentation outlines the system of Islamic Marriages.
Presented at the University of the West Indies, Trinidad to a Counseling class of students.
Modes of Originating Process - For Revision Purposes OnlyAzrin Hafiz
Modes of Originating Process pursuant to Rules of Court 2012
as per syllabus of LAW547 - Advanced Civil Procedure I
Universiti Teknologi MARA, MALAYSIA
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf46adnanshahzad
All eyes on Rafah: But why?. The Rafah border crossing, a crucial point between Egypt and the Gaza Strip, often finds itself at the center of global attention. As we explore the significance of Rafah, we’ll uncover why all eyes are on Rafah and the complexities surrounding this pivotal region.
INTRODUCTION
What makes Rafah so significant that it captures global attention? The phrase ‘All eyes are on Rafah’ resonates not just with those in the region but with people worldwide who recognize its strategic, humanitarian, and political importance. In this guide, we will delve into the factors that make Rafah a focal point for international interest, examining its historical context, humanitarian challenges, and political dimensions.
WINDING UP of COMPANY, Modes of DissolutionKHURRAMWALI
Winding up, also known as liquidation, refers to the legal and financial process of dissolving a company. It involves ceasing operations, selling assets, settling debts, and ultimately removing the company from the official business registry.
Here's a breakdown of the key aspects of winding up:
Reasons for Winding Up:
Insolvency: This is the most common reason, where the company cannot pay its debts. Creditors may initiate a compulsory winding up to recover their dues.
Voluntary Closure: The owners may decide to close the company due to reasons like reaching business goals, facing losses, or merging with another company.
Deadlock: If shareholders or directors cannot agree on how to run the company, a court may order a winding up.
Types of Winding Up:
Voluntary Winding Up: This is initiated by the company's shareholders through a resolution passed by a majority vote. There are two main types:
Members' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is solvent (has enough assets to pay off its debts) and shareholders will receive any remaining assets after debts are settled.
Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is insolvent and creditors will be prioritized in receiving payment from the sale of assets.
Compulsory Winding Up: This is initiated by a court order, typically at the request of creditors, government agencies, or even by the company itself if it's insolvent.
Process of Winding Up:
Appointment of Liquidator: A qualified professional is appointed to oversee the winding-up process. They are responsible for selling assets, paying off debts, and distributing any remaining funds.
Cease Trading: The company stops its regular business operations.
Notification of Creditors: Creditors are informed about the winding up and invited to submit their claims.
Sale of Assets: The company's assets are sold to generate cash to pay off creditors.
Payment of Debts: Creditors are paid according to a set order of priority, with secured creditors receiving payment before unsecured creditors.
Distribution to Shareholders: If there are any remaining funds after all debts are settled, they are distributed to shareholders according to their ownership stake.
Dissolution: Once all claims are settled and distributions made, the company is officially dissolved and removed from the business register.
Impact of Winding Up:
Employees: Employees will likely lose their jobs during the winding-up process.
Creditors: Creditors may not recover their debts in full, especially if the company is insolvent.
Shareholders: Shareholders may not receive any payout if the company's debts exceed its assets.
Winding up is a complex legal and financial process that can have significant consequences for all parties involved. It's important to seek professional legal and financial advice when considering winding up a company.
Debt Mapping Camp bebas riba to know how much our debt
Divorce according to West Pakistan Family Courts Act 1964
1. How do I start my divorce?
&
What should I expect?
Presented by:
The Law House
Farooq Haider Advocate High Court
0345-7571135
2. This presentation contains general information and does
not constitute legal advice.
Be sure to direct specific questions about your own
situation to a lawyer.
Presented by:
The Law House
Farooq Haider Advocate High Court
0345-7571135
3. Divorce
West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964
Stage 1: beginning of the case
Stage 2: summoning of defendant
Stage 3: written reply of defendant
Stage 4: reconciliation between the parties
Stage 5: divorce in result of failure of
reconciliation
Presented by:
The Law House
Farooq Haider Advocate High Court
0345-7571135
4. Stage 6: temporary allowance for
Children (if any)
Stage 7: documentary & oral evidence of
both parties
Stage 8: final arguments
Stage 9: judgment & decree of the court.
Presented by:
The Law House
Farooq Haider Advocate High Court
0345-7571135
5. A party can file a single suit for:
(i)Divorce
(ii)Dower
(iii)Maintenance Allowance
(iv)Custody of Children
(v)Restitution of Conjugal Rights
(vi)Guardianship
(vii)Jactitation of Marriage
(viii)Dowry
(xi)Personal property & belongings
6. The typical divorce process begins when one spouse files a plaint for divorce:
The “plaint” is legal paperwork that you or your
attorney give to the courts to start your divorce
process.
It states grounds for divorce includes:
(i) Whereabouts of the husband not known for a
period of one year.
(ii) Husband has neglected or failed to provide
maintenance for a period of two years.
(iii) Husband has been sentenced to imprisonment
for a period of 3 years or upwards.
Divorce Stage One: W.P.F.C. Act 1964 Divorce Process
7. (iv) Husband has failed to perform marital
obligations for a period of 3 years.
(v) Husband has impotent.
(vi) Husband has been insane for a period of 1 year.
(vii) At the time of marriage girl was minor.
(viii) Husband treats woman with cruelty.
Divorce Stage One: W.P.F.C. Act 1964 Divorce Process
Presented by:
The Law House
Farooq Haider Advocate High Court
0345-7571135
8. PLAINT: Paperwork that states facts and grounds for divorce.
• Spouse filing the complaint becomes the “plaintiff.”
• Stage 2: The plaintiff then serves spouse with summons and plaint
before next date of hearing.
• Plaintiff files proof of service, to say that summons has served and
informed about the plaint filed against him.
Stage 3: RESPONSE: Appearance, Answer and/or Counterclaim.
• Responding spouse becomes the “defendant”.
• Upon receipt of the summons, the defendant has 30 days to file an
appearance or answer, which may include a counterclaim/written reply.
Divorce Stage 2&3: W.P.F.C. Act 1964 Divorce Process
9. If no response to plaint within 30 days, the
plaintiff can seek an Ex-parte proceedings
against the defendant.
Example: defendant avoids to appear and face the
proceedings.
This can also be an intentional strategy, to get
an uncontested divorce.
10. After filing written statement by the defendant court will
initiate Pre-trial proceedings/reconciliation between the
parties.
Court will ask about the earnings and source of income
from the defendant to ascertain the amount of temporary
allowance.
If pre-trial proceedings/reconciliation results in failure
then court will ask for evidence of both parties.
Discovery: This is the effort to discover facts relevant to the divorce case through requests for
documents and information about things such as earnings, monthly budgets, assets, debts, etc.
Divorce Stage 4: W.P.F.C. Act 1964 Divorce Process
11. After failing of pre-trial proceedings family
court will decree the case of plaintiff to the
extent of Divorce and go for further
proceedings.
Court will frame issues and ask evidence
from the parties.
Divorce Stage 5: W.P.F.C. Act 1964 Divorce Process
Presented by:
The Law House
Farooq Haider Advocate High Court
0345-7571135
12. Family court also have jurisdiction to fix temporary
allowance for the minor children (if any)
Family court always determine temporary allowance
according to the income sources of the defendant.
Divorce Stage 6: W.P.F.C. Act 1964 Divorce Process
Presented by:
The Law House
Farooq Haider Advocate High Court
0345-7571135
13. Family court shall examine the witnesses produced
by the parties in such order as it deems fit.
Family court may put any question to any witness
for the purpose of elucidation of any point which it
considers important to ascertain the truth.
Family court may ask for the affidavits of the
witnesses instead of oral evidence.
Divorce Stage 7: W.P.F.C. Act 1964 Divorce Process
14. Family court before announcing its final judgment and
decree hear both the counsels of the parties.
Divorce Stage 8: W.P.F.C. Act 1964 Divorce Process
Presented by:
The Law House
Farooq Haider Advocate High Court
0345-7571135
15. Family Court shall make another effort to effect a
compromise or reconciliation between the parties
within a period not exceeding fifteen days.
If such compromise or conciliation is not possible,
the family court shall announce its judgment and
give a decree.
Divorce Stage 9: W.P.F.C. Act 1964 Divorce Process
Presented by:
The Law House
Farooq Haider Advocate High Court
0345-7571135
16. The court will send cases involving custody to
family courts.
The family judge will settle all the disputes with
in 6 months.
17. Call us:
Divorce Questions? Can We Help?
(0345) 7571135
Email us:
farooq_haider22@yahoo.com
Adv.farooqi@gmail.com Presented by:
The Law House
Farooq Haider Advocate High Court
0345-7571135