This summary provides an overview of key ideas from a multi-paragraph document discussing Crawford's views on various topics: - Crawford suggests that being a mindful worker involves engaging with objects that resist one's will, like working on an old Volkswagen. This can foster humility over a sense of mastery. - He criticizes society for rushing between addictions and argues corporate interests are addicted to consumers' addictions. - Crawford also discusses the possibility that degraded work can entail a "moral re-education" and form workers suited only for careless labor, creating a vicious cycle. He questions whether more education results in new heights of stupidity in some corporate knowledge work.

1. Some day…Lustre?

2. I used to own…Lustre?

3. How do objects resist our will? What is the connection between stubborn objects, subjectivity and virtue? What might objects be telling us about the nature of the ‘education’ we are receiving?Disobedient Stuff

4. Chapters 4, 5, 6“Absurdity is good for comedy, but bad as a way of life.”Matthew B. Crawford

5. “In calling attention to the dangers of one kind of addiction, the tobacco controversy distracts from the much greater danger that we are an addictive society – that our people are rushing from one expensive and dangerous fix to another, from drugs to war to useless merchandise to carious commercial thrills, and that our corporate pushers are addicted to our addictions.” (p.58)Wendell Berry

6. Never say no to the panda…

7. Healthy

8. Preservatives

9. Cost

10. Local

11. Fresh

12. Quality

13. Calories, Fat, Sugar, etc.Walking down the aisle of your favourite grocery store, what are some of the criteria that you use in choosing your food?Choosing food…

14. A more pedestrian way to ask this question:What is it that makes some food better to eat than other food?Mom’s home cooking vs. Restaurant foodCriteria: Who makes it?Fine wine vs. home brew kitsCriteria: How it is made? Expertise?Snails vs. EscargotCriteria: What it is called?Standing at the kitchen counter vs. Candle-lit, beach-side, cabanaCriteria: Where it is eaten? OR…“We have an idea of the thing that, in a sense, pre-constitutes the thing for us, prior to sensual experience” (p.91)Think about: The mindful worker…Are some foods more real than others?

15. “So to be a good mechanic you have to be constantly attentive to the possibility that you may be wrong.” (p.99)Iris Murdoch on responding to the world justly, “…perceive it clearly, and this requires a kind of “un-selfing”. [A]nything which alters consciousness in the direction of unselfishness, objectivity, and realism is to be connected with virtue. [V]irtue is the attempt to pierce the veil of selfish consciousness and join the world as it really is.” (p.100)Agree?Attentiveness, un-selfing, & virtue

16. “What impresses me about it, however, is the insistent practicality implicit in it. If we are up against mystery, then we dare act only on the most modest assumptions. The modernMystery vs. Randomnessscientific program has held that me must act on the basis of knowledge, which…we have assumed to be ample. But if we are up against mystery, then knowledge is relatively small.…Acting (under this assumption) requires one to remember…for instance, that failure is possible, that error is possible, that second chances are desirable…” - -Berry (in ‘Letter to Wes Jackson’ in Home Economics)

17. “But a more public-spirited calculus would include a humane regard for the kind of labour involved in each alternative…If the regard that many people now have for the wider ramifications of their food choices could be brought to our relationships to our own automobiles, it would help sustain pockets of mindful labour.” (p.102)In this passage Crawford seems to take up a somewhat Marxist critique of “the ever bolder raid of capital into the psychic territory of labour” (perhaps his way of saying increasingly alienated labour). Is Crawford’s idea actually as public-spirited as he claims? Is it more virtuous to be a mindful worker? Is a mindful worker actually more in touch with the real world? Is Crawford actually only arguing for ‘kinder-gentler’ version of capitalism? Is this kind of capitalism any better than any other of its incarnations?Attentiveness, un-selfing, & virtueAlso See: The Pleasures of Eatingby Wendell Berry

18. Crawford seems to suggest that a mindful worker is one whois willing to engage (almost to allow) objects that resist the will of the worker. i.e. working on his perpetually lifeless VW.“The feeling of being subject to fate chastens the conceit of mastery. This might make a person humble, but in my own case the humility had an edge to it. As I groped my way toward a modus vivendi with the Bug, I took my new fatalism to be a stinging rebuke to the pretence of the easy intellectual mastery that my father was offering. So my own sense of impotence was weirdly delicious; it was based on a truer self-awareness than my father possessed, as I saw it.” (p.80)What are some ways you have experienced objects resisting your will? How do disobedient (resistant) objects affect subjectivity? Does disengagement with obstinate objects reduce the subject somehow? Is ‘un-selfing’ actually possible? Does this attentiveness enhance or reduce the subject?Attentiveness, un-selfing, & virtue

19. “In calling attention to the dangers of one kind of addiction, the tobacco controversy distracts from the much greater danger that we are an addictive society – that our people are rushing from one expensive and dangerous fix to another, from drugs to war to useless merchandise to carious commercial thrills, and that our corporate pushers are addicted to our addictions.” (p.58)Wendell Berry