The Russian business community has adopted an Anti-Corruption Charter to establish high standards of business conduct and build responsible partnerships with the government. The Charter recognizes that corruption undermines the economy and rule of law. It establishes 10 principles for companies to implement, including adopting anti-corruption programs, monitoring implementation, ensuring financial transparency, training employees, publicly committing to anti-corruption measures, and rejecting illegally obtained benefits. Signatories to the Charter pledge to observe these principles to promote integrity and prevent corruption.
Антикоррупционна хартия российского бизнеса (english version)OporaRussiaMoscow
This document summarizes an anti-corruption charter signed by several Russian business organizations. The charter aims to promote anti-corruption principles in business dealings both within companies and between businesses and the government. It establishes 12 principles for preventing and countering corruption, including implementing anti-corruption programs, monitoring programs, financial controls, training employees, transparency, rejecting illegal benefits, partner vetting, procurement procedures, information sharing, government cooperation, and international anti-bribery standards. An annex establishes a joint committee and registry to facilitate implementation of the charter's provisions.
Антикоррупционна хартия российского бизнеса (english version)OporaRussiaMoscow
This document summarizes an anti-corruption charter signed by several Russian business organizations. The charter aims to promote anti-corruption principles in business dealings both within companies and between businesses and the government. It establishes 12 principles for preventing and countering corruption, including implementing anti-corruption programs, monitoring programs, financial controls, training employees, transparency, rejecting illegal benefits, partner vetting, procurement procedures, information sharing, government cooperation, and international anti-bribery standards. An annex establishes a joint committee and registry to facilitate implementation of the charter's provisions.
Third Party Due Diligence - Know Your Third Party - EY IndiaErnst & Young
This document discusses key components of an effective third-party due diligence program to manage compliance risks. It recommends taking a risk-based approach, with varying levels (I, II, III) of investigation based on perceived risk. Level I involves open-source checks, Level II adds localized records searches and reference calls, and Level III includes on-site inspections. An effective program incorporates consistency, management oversight, objectivity, and reasonableness. Management should establish standards, provide oversight, and take appropriate actions. Due diligence procedures should be documented, centralized, and follow predictable rules to reduce ambiguity and demonstrate a fact-based, defensible process.
This document discusses corporate social responsibility (CSR) and its evolution in India. It provides details on the history of CSR in India through various phases. It describes the provisions for CSR under the Companies Act 2013 and activities covered under Schedule VII. It discusses the role of banks in India in promoting financial inclusion, priority sector lending, self help groups (SHGs), and implementing various government rural development schemes.
This document discusses corporate social responsibility (CSR) and the evolution of CSR practices in India, particularly for banks and other corporations. It provides details on the history and phases of CSR in India, the legal requirements for CSR under the Companies Act 2013, common CSR activities undertaken in India, and the Reserve Bank of India's guidelines on CSR for banks. The key points are that CSR has evolved from voluntary charity to an integral part of business operations, the Companies Act 2013 mandates CSR spending for large companies, and banks undertake CSR activities focused on financial inclusion, priority sector lending, and rural development.
The document discusses the importance of third-party anti-corruption programs and risk management. It notes that most corruption cases involve third parties rather than employees. It emphasizes that companies need to identify high-risk third parties and subject them to increased scrutiny and procedures. It promotes the use of technology solutions to efficiently collect data, assess risks, and manage anti-corruption compliance programs for third parties.
The document discusses social audits, corporate governance, ethics programs, and corporate social responsibility. It provides definitions and discusses features, organization, benefits and mechanisms of each topic. For example, it defines social audit as a systematic evaluation of an organization's social performance and impact, outlines various approaches to social audits, and notes they lead to a report on social performance. It also discusses the benefits organizations gain from implementing strong ethics programs and practicing good corporate governance.
Transparency International's Business Integrity Toolkit provides a six-step process for companies to build an effective anti-corruption program: Commit, Assess, Plan, Act, Monitor, and Report. The document outlines each step and what is expected from businesses. It provides examples of commitment statements and anti-bribery policies. Tools from Transparency International are also presented that can help with risk assessments, training, monitoring, and reporting on anti-corruption programs.
On Tuesday, 23 September, MCRB hosted a half-day workshop on “Anti-Corruption Programmes” for Myanmar businesses in Yangon. The workshop, held in collaboration with Spectrum – a Yangon-based sustainable development knowledge network - was the first in a series of events to follow-up on the Transparency in Myanmar Enterprises (TiME) report and build business capacity in the area of anti-corruption and human rights.
The document discusses the UK Bribery Act, which created a new legal framework to combat bribery and corruption. It established four key offences: bribing another person, accepting a bribe, bribing a foreign official, and a new corporate offence of failing to prevent bribery on a company's behalf. It also outlines six principles for procedures to prevent bribery. The document notes that most FCPA fines have involved non-US companies, senior executives often face prosecution, and bribery risk is often linked to high growth. It recommends companies use risk assessment tools to protect their reputation.
Third Party Due Diligence - Know Your Third Party - EY IndiaErnst & Young
This document discusses key components of an effective third-party due diligence program to manage compliance risks. It recommends taking a risk-based approach, with varying levels (I, II, III) of investigation based on perceived risk. Level I involves open-source checks, Level II adds localized records searches and reference calls, and Level III includes on-site inspections. An effective program incorporates consistency, management oversight, objectivity, and reasonableness. Management should establish standards, provide oversight, and take appropriate actions. Due diligence procedures should be documented, centralized, and follow predictable rules to reduce ambiguity and demonstrate a fact-based, defensible process.
This document discusses corporate social responsibility (CSR) and its evolution in India. It provides details on the history of CSR in India through various phases. It describes the provisions for CSR under the Companies Act 2013 and activities covered under Schedule VII. It discusses the role of banks in India in promoting financial inclusion, priority sector lending, self help groups (SHGs), and implementing various government rural development schemes.
This document discusses corporate social responsibility (CSR) and the evolution of CSR practices in India, particularly for banks and other corporations. It provides details on the history and phases of CSR in India, the legal requirements for CSR under the Companies Act 2013, common CSR activities undertaken in India, and the Reserve Bank of India's guidelines on CSR for banks. The key points are that CSR has evolved from voluntary charity to an integral part of business operations, the Companies Act 2013 mandates CSR spending for large companies, and banks undertake CSR activities focused on financial inclusion, priority sector lending, and rural development.
The document discusses the importance of third-party anti-corruption programs and risk management. It notes that most corruption cases involve third parties rather than employees. It emphasizes that companies need to identify high-risk third parties and subject them to increased scrutiny and procedures. It promotes the use of technology solutions to efficiently collect data, assess risks, and manage anti-corruption compliance programs for third parties.
The document discusses social audits, corporate governance, ethics programs, and corporate social responsibility. It provides definitions and discusses features, organization, benefits and mechanisms of each topic. For example, it defines social audit as a systematic evaluation of an organization's social performance and impact, outlines various approaches to social audits, and notes they lead to a report on social performance. It also discusses the benefits organizations gain from implementing strong ethics programs and practicing good corporate governance.
Transparency International's Business Integrity Toolkit provides a six-step process for companies to build an effective anti-corruption program: Commit, Assess, Plan, Act, Monitor, and Report. The document outlines each step and what is expected from businesses. It provides examples of commitment statements and anti-bribery policies. Tools from Transparency International are also presented that can help with risk assessments, training, monitoring, and reporting on anti-corruption programs.
On Tuesday, 23 September, MCRB hosted a half-day workshop on “Anti-Corruption Programmes” for Myanmar businesses in Yangon. The workshop, held in collaboration with Spectrum – a Yangon-based sustainable development knowledge network - was the first in a series of events to follow-up on the Transparency in Myanmar Enterprises (TiME) report and build business capacity in the area of anti-corruption and human rights.
The document discusses the UK Bribery Act, which created a new legal framework to combat bribery and corruption. It established four key offences: bribing another person, accepting a bribe, bribing a foreign official, and a new corporate offence of failing to prevent bribery on a company's behalf. It also outlines six principles for procedures to prevent bribery. The document notes that most FCPA fines have involved non-US companies, senior executives often face prosecution, and bribery risk is often linked to high growth. It recommends companies use risk assessment tools to protect their reputation.
This document discusses compliance programs that companies can implement to prevent anti-competitive practices. It outlines common features of effective compliance programs, including endorsement from senior management, clear policies and procedures, identification of responsibilities, training, controls, and evaluation. It also discusses trends in compliance among competition authorities in different jurisdictions, noting guidance and templates provided. Finally, it discusses international cooperation on compliance through UN principles for enterprises operating across borders.
Whistleblower Best Practices: What Do Compliance and Business Leaders Need to...Ethisphere
Greg Radinsky, Cynthia Jackson, and Joan Meyer spoke at a webcast on May 15, 2015 about whistleblower best practices. They discussed key themes such as the goal of promptly uncovering misconduct through whistleblower programs. U.S. expectations include encouraging internal reporting and protecting whistleblowers. An effective program provides reporting channels, screens reports by priority, trains employees, conducts awareness campaigns, and monitors performance. However, some countries have laws conflicting with U.S. standards regarding anonymity, data privacy, and labor issues that must be addressed for global rollouts.
Anti fraud & amp; corruption policy of FAPA BangladeshFAPA Bangladesh
MJF is a leading human rights organization in Bangladesh committed to preventing fraud and corruption. This policy outlines MJF's anti-fraud framework, which includes establishing an anti-corruption culture, conducting risk assessments, financial monitoring of partner organizations, and protected reporting channels for employees. The Director of Finance and Administration is responsible for ensuring adequate anti-fraud controls and measures are in place, such as internal auditing. The policy aims to establish high ethical standards and maintain integrity in the use of organizational funds.
Speech by U Aung Kyi, Chair of the Anti-Corruption Commission in Myanmar (Eng...Ethical Sector
On 5 December 2018, MCRB and the Union of Myanmar Chamber of Commerce and Industry co-hosted the third of MCRB’s ‘responsible business seminars’, with a focus on combatting corruption.
Read more: https://www.myanmar-responsiblebusiness.org/news/tone-from-the-top.html
This document provides guidance on good governance characteristics for civil society organizations to implement strong internal accountability measures. It identifies key features such as governance structures, integrity policies, and transparency standards. Governance structures should include a clear mission, decision-making processes, and conflict of interest policies for the board. Integrity policies include codes of conduct, anti-corruption policies, whistleblowing protections, and complaints mechanisms. Transparency standards involve regular reporting of finances, operations, and accountability to stakeholders. Overall, the document outlines internal accountability systems non-profits can establish to prevent corruption and maintain public trust.
Embracing the Consumer Duty Imperative: A Comprehensive GuideRNayak3
With the Financial Conduct Authority introducing changes to its Consumer Duty regulations, this paper elucidates the implications and consequences of non-compliance.
The document discusses international conventions and measures against corruption in the business sector. It outlines the costs of corruption, including over $1 trillion paid in bribes annually. Various international conventions are summarized that prohibit corruption, such as the OECD Convention and UN Convention Against Corruption. Best practices for businesses to prevent corruption are presented, including adopting ethics codes, auditing controls, and prohibiting bribery. The roles and responsibilities of both governments and businesses in combating corruption are also discussed.
Deloitte has been at the forefront of providing services to help clients - especially for some of the leading financial institutions - to help deal with myriad business and compliance issues presented by financial crime. See More : https://www2.deloitte.com/in/en/pages/finance/topics/forensic.html
Ethical and unethical business practicesPooja Lilani
An Infosys employee provided testimony to a US Senate subcommittee alleging unethical practices by Infosys related to visa fraud. The employee accused Infosys of intentionally violating visa and tax laws to increase revenues. Specifically, he said Infosys used B-1 visas to bring relatively inexperienced Indian workers to the US for projects instead of H-1B visas. Infosys then charged US client rates but paid the workers lower Indian salaries without paying US taxes. Infosys denied the allegations. The testimony has led to a probe by US authorities into Infosys' visa practices.
Transparency International is a global anti-corruption organization with over 90 chapters worldwide. The document describes the Business Principles for Countering Bribery, a framework developed by Transparency International through a multi-stakeholder process to help companies develop effective anti-bribery programs. The principles were first published in 2003 and recently revised in 2013 based on changes in anti-corruption laws and practices. The principles provide guidance to companies on developing a comprehensive anti-bribery program addressing issues like risk assessment, policies, training, oversight and cooperation with authorities.
El Puerto de Algeciras continúa un año más como el más eficiente del continente europeo y vuelve a situarse en el “top ten” mundial, según el informe The Container Port Performance Index 2023 (CPPI), elaborado por el Banco Mundial y la consultora S&P Global.
El informe CPPI utiliza dos enfoques metodológicos diferentes para calcular la clasificación del índice: uno administrativo o técnico y otro estadístico, basado en análisis factorial (FA). Según los autores, esta dualidad pretende asegurar una clasificación que refleje con precisión el rendimiento real del puerto, a la vez que sea estadísticamente sólida. En esta edición del informe CPPI 2023, se han empleado los mismos enfoques metodológicos y se ha aplicado un método de agregación de clasificaciones para combinar los resultados de ambos enfoques y obtener una clasificación agregada.
Essential Tools for Modern PR Business .pptxPragencyuk
Discover the essential tools and strategies for modern PR business success. Learn how to craft compelling news releases, leverage press release sites and news wires, stay updated with PR news, and integrate effective PR practices to enhance your brand's visibility and credibility. Elevate your PR efforts with our comprehensive guide.
An astonishing, first-of-its-kind, report by the NYT assessing damage in Ukraine. Even if the war ends tomorrow, in many places there will be nothing to go back to.
Acolyte Episodes review (TV series) The Acolyte. Learn about the influence of the program on the Star Wars world, as well as new characters and story twists.
Here is Gabe Whitley's response to my defamation lawsuit for him calling me a rapist and perjurer in court documents.
You have to read it to believe it, but after you read it, you won't believe it. And I included eight examples of defamatory statements/
1. Anti-Corruption Charter of the Russian Business
The Russian business community sees its mission in complying with
high standards of doing business that conform to internationally recognized
norms and in building a responsible partnership with the Government
aimed at improving the living standards of Russian citizens, developing the
national economy and making it more competitive.
Successful implementation of these objectives is hindered by corrupt
practices deeply rooted in the economic and social fields significantly
impairing competition and affecting the entrepreneurial environment.
We, representatives of the business community of the Russian
Federation, being aware of our responsibility for our country's destiny and
realizing that success in business is impossible without a universal
consensus on rejecting any form of corruption, are committed to promoting
the principles of preventing and counteracting corruption – both in dealing
with government authorities and in corporate relationships.
We, Parties to this Charter, shall make every effort to ensure that
corrupt practices, regardless of their forms or methods, are not only
punished by law but also condemned by general public and rejected as a
dangerous social evil.
We all share the understanding that corruption,
being a form of obtaining illegal advantages, benefits or personal
wealth, seriously undermines democratic institutions, national economy
and rule of law;
deprives society of resources needed for development, taking
a significant portion of national wealth out of legal business turnover;
generates threats to and limitations for a stable and safe development
of society, erodes moral foundations and values and hampers fair
competition and sustainable development;
creates conditions for proliferation of other forms of crime, including
laundering proceeds of crime;
represents a transnational phenomenon rather than a local problem,
that determines the critical importance of international cooperation in
preventing and combating corruption.
By signing this Charter, we declare and undertake to observe and
promote the following basic principles of preventing and countering
corruption.
2. 2
1.
Corporate Governance Based on Anti-Corruption
Programs
A basic condition for countering corruption is the introduction of
anti-corruption programs and other anti-corruption corporate policy
measures into corporate governance practices.
Corporate programs and other internal corporate documents shall
clearly and precisely set forth principles, rules and procedures aimed at
preventing corruption in all fields of corporate activities, including business
ethics, special management procedures, personnel training requirements,
special anti-corruption supervision and audit rules, conflict of interest and
commercial bribery prevention procedures, donation, sponsorship, and
charity rules, etc.
Companies shall develop anti-corruption measures taking into
account specific features of their activities and such factors as a company
size, its line of business, aggregate risks, geographical scope of activities,
current situation and corporate culture characteristics.
Companies shall use internal tools and procedures that allow to
improve anti-corruption programs, such as feedback mechanisms, conflict
of interest prevention and resolution, and grievance examination
mechanisms.
2.
Monitoring and Evaluation of Anti-Corruption Program
Implementation
Corporate management bodies, both sole-executive and collegiate,
including boards of directors, shall manage the development and monitor
the implementation of corporate anti-corruption policies and designate
officers in charge of implementation thereof.
Corporate executives should demonstrate responsible behavior to be
followed by their employees, provide the necessary assistance to senior
managers and other corporate officers in effective fulfillment of
requirements of anti-corruption programs and ensure improvement of such
programs taking into account the effectiveness of their implementation.
Program implementation shall be monitored and evaluated in
accordance with a company management structure, with the participation
of internal supervision and audit bodies. Results of the anti-corruption
program implementation shall be reflected in corporate social reporting.
3. 3
3.
Effective Financial Control
Companies shall establish and maintain effective internal control,
which includes organizational tools for auditing book-keeping and
accounting practices, human resource management and other activities
covered by anti-corruption programs, and shall regularly review internal
control systems to ensure their compliance with anti-corruption program
requirements.
Companies shall supervise the accuracy of financial transactions by
duly documenting them and take action to prevent, inter alia:
–
generation of off-the-books (double) accounts;
–
making of off-the-books or inaccurately accounted transactions;
–
recording of non-existent expenses;
–
entry of liabilities with incorrect identification of their objects;
–
intentional destruction of accounting and other documents earlier
than foreseen by law.
4.
Personnel Training and Supervision
Based on anti-corruption programs, companies shall provide training
of their personnel and ensure their active involvement in the
implementation of such programs. Training programs shall be developed
with due regard for the trainees' objectives and job functions and shall be
regularly revised to enhance their effectiveness.
Companies shall take measures to ensure compliance by their
employees with the requirements of anti-corruption programs and shall
guarantee that none of their employees will suffer in terms of
career-development or financial harm if they reject corrupt practices, even
if such rejection leads to financial damages for the company. Violation of
anti-corruption requirements shall be punishable by disciplinary actions, up
to and including discharge of perpetrators, subject to compliance with labor
and corporate laws.
The results of the implementation of anti-corruption programs shall
be integrated in the corporate human resource policy.
4. 4
5.
Collective Efforts and Publicity of Anti-Corruption
Measures
Companies shall publicly announce their anti-corruption policies and
apply effective mechanisms to communicate anti-corruption program
information within the company.
Companies shall create an environment that enables their employees
and other persons to freely identify program defects and to promptly report
suspicious circumstances to officers in charge.
In support of this principle, companies shall create secure and
accessible communication channels to be used by company employees and
other persons to identify program defects and report suspicious
circumstances confidentially and without fear of being punished.
6.
Rejection of Illegally Obtained Benefits
Companies shall pursue responsible policies to promote their
interests in order to strengthen their market positions.
Companies shall develop and apply supervision rules (including
expense ceilings and reporting procedures) to ensure compliance with
anti-corruption program requirements both with respect to third parties and
to their own employees responsible for making management decisions.
Such rules shall envisage rejection of offering or accepting gifts or
paying expenses when such actions may influence (or appear to influence)
the results of a business transaction, a tender, or a decision of a government
authority or public official. In other cases, companies shall strictly adhere
to their own procedures for giving or accepting gifts, showing hospitality
and paying for services, based on the principles of transparency, good faith,
prudence and acceptability of such actions.
Any donations and sponsorship contributions made by companies
shall be fully transparent and consistent with existing laws. Companies
shall see to it that their donations and sponsorship contributions shall not be
a hidden form of bribery.
7.
Partner and Counterparty Relationships Based on
Anti-Corruption Policy Principles
Companies shall strive to build their relationships with affiliates,
partners and third parties in compliance with anti-corruption principles,
5. 5
shall inform all stakeholders about their anti-corruption policy and
implement it in their organizational units and affiliates.
When assessing the due diligence of their partners and counterparties,
companies shall take into account their degree of rejection of corrupt
practices in doing business, including the existence and implementation of
anti-corruption programs. In this respect, compliance with anti-corruption
principles shall be deemed as an important factor for establishing
contractual relationships, including the option to duly terminate contractual
relationships in case of violation of anti-corruption principles.
In cooperating with partners and counterparties, wherever possible,
companies shall monitor the soundness and proportionality of fees paid to
agents, advisors and other intermediaries, as well as the adequacy of such
fees to the services actually and legally provided and the conformity to the
established legal payment procedures.
It shall be unacceptable for a company that pursues an anti-corruption
policy to promise, offer, give or accept, any undue benefit or advantage,
whether directly or through an intermediary, to any executive, officer or
employee of another company for any action or omission in violation of the
established duties.
8.
Transparent and Open Procurement Procedures
Companies shall procure goods, works and services on the basis of
transparent, competitive and objective decision-making principles, and in
so doing they shall:
– publicly distribute information relating to procurement
procedures and contracts, including information on invitations to tenders
and on the award of contracts, allowing potential tenderers sufficient time
to prepare and submit their bids;
– publish tendering rules and establish, in advance, conditions for
participation in tenders, including selection and decision-making criteria to
award contracts;
– use open forms of tendering and other procurement procedures
as a priority method to procure goods, works and services;
– establish a system of internal procurement control and use such
legal mechanisms as administrative appeal, recourse and other remedies in
case of non-compliance with procurement rules;
6. 6
– take measures regarding personnel responsible for
procurement, such as demanding them to declare a conflict of interest and
monitoring compliance with professional training requirements, etc.
9.
The Use of Information to Counter Corruption
Companies shall encourage detection of information on unlawful or
suspicious actions that might be considered as corruption and encourage
efforts to search for, obtain and distribute such information about their own
activities.
For these purposes, companies shall be ready to respond to requests,
consider reports about facts of corrupt practices and ensure the
investigation of such reports by independent officials.
Companies shall support efforts to inform business community,
government authorities and the public about the facts of corrupt practices,
to disclose companies and persons using corrupt schemes, and to create
a zero-tolerance-for-corruption environment.
In some instances provided for by law, certain restrictions may be
imposed, in particular, in order to:
– protect legitimate rights, reputations and personal data;
– ensure security and public order;
– protect business secrets and abide by a confidentiality regime.
10.
Cooperation with the Government
Companies shall follow the principle of mutual business and
government responsibility, agreed and targeted joint actions against
corruption and shall not permit unlawful interference in the government
authorities' actions.
Important elements of cooperation include, inter alia:
– public promotion and protection of the principle that lawfully
operating businesses are profitable and successful;
– active media coverage of businesses and entrepreneurs using
anti-corruption practices;
– comprehensive support for and promotion of businesses' good
practices in opposing attempted corruption pressures.
When the government authorities perform control and audit
functions, companies shall assist them in creating conditions for non-biased
inspections and shall not impede lawful actions of such authorities.
7. 7
Companies are not allowed to use for their benefit improper forms of
collaboration with representatives of government authorities, such as
promising, offering or giving, directly or through intermediaries, any undue
benefits or advantages.
11.
Promotion of Justice and Respect for the Rule of Law
For anti-corruption actions to be successful, they should be supported
by effective law enforcement work, therefore the Parties to this Charter
express their readiness to provide all-round support in detecting and
investigating corrupt practices and hereby undertake to prevent:
– threats or promises, offers or giving of improper benefits to
induce persons to give false evidence or interfere in giving evidence or
testimony regarding corruption- related offenses;
– interference in the official duties of judicial or law enforcement
officers in the course of proceedings in corruption-related offenses.
A possibility to legalize illegally acquired money represents a major
driver of corruption, therefore the Parties to this Charter shall counteract
attempted legalization of criminal proceeds, including:
– acquisition, possession, or use of assets that are known to be
criminal proceeds;
– concealment or non-disclosure of the true nature, source,
location, disposition, movement, owner of or rights to assets that are known
to be criminal proceeds.
Financial companies shall provide for proper identification of clients,
owners and beneficiaries and report suspicious transactions to competent
authorities and perform other mandatory actions aimed at counteracting
legalization of criminal proceeds.
12. Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials and
Officials of International Public Organizations
Companies shall abstain from promising, offering or giving any
undue benefits to a foreign public official or an official of an international
public organization, directly or through intermediaries, for this official or
other natural or legal person, so that this official act or refrain from acting
while exercising his/her official duties, in order to obtain or retain business
or other improper advantage.
8. 8
Final Provisions
Provisions of this Charter are aimed at preventing and combating
corruption and shall equally apply to self-employed entrepreneurs, any
company or entity of any form of ownership, size, line of business, or
location.
This Charter covers relationships both within business community
and between businesses and government authorities.
Russian business and employer associations that are Parties to this
Charter, recognizing the need for targeted and consistent efforts to promote
this Charter among their members, shall encourage the development and
implementation of best corporate practices, such as performance evaluation
and reputation enhancement systems, including through corporate
non-financial social reporting.
This Charter is open to accession by Russia's national, regional, or
industry associations and by Russian and foreign companies operating in
Russia. Companies may accede to this Charter directly or through
associations of which they are members.
For
For
the
the
Chamber of
Russian Union of
Commerce and Industrialists and
Industry of the
Entrepreneurs
Russian
Federation
/signed/
S.N.Katyrin
/signed/
A.N.Shokhin
For
the
All-Russian
Public
Organization
“Delovaya
Rossiya”
(Business
Russia)
/signed/
A.S.Galushka
For
the
All-Russian
Public
Organization of
Small and
Medium Business
"OPORA Russia"
/signed/
S.R.Borisov