SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 1
Download to read offline
9 Sep 2008, 0000 hrs IST,TNN



Centre moves to impeach HC judge
NEW DELHI: The Centre will move an impeachment motion against Calcutta
High Court judge Soumitra Sen on a recommendation by Chief Justice of India K
G Balakrishnan seeking his dismissal for corrupt practices which have brought
disrepute to the judiciary.

The government was forced to respond after the CJI's recommendations were
reported in the media on Monday. Law minister H R Bhardwaj said an
impeachment motion would be placed before Parliament on October 17 when it is
scheduled to meet. The impeachment will follow an inquiry to be carried out by
the presiding officers of both Houses.

In a letter to the PM dated August 4, the CJI said a committee of senior judges
had found Justice Sen to have misappropriated around Rs 24 lakh in a case where
he had been appointed receiver in the 1990s. He was then a lawyer practising in
the Calcutta HC and had deposited the money in his own accounts.

He had also given a "false explanation" to the HC about Rs 25 lakh having been
invested while the money had been withdrawn and invested in a venture that went
into liquidation.

The HC had passed an adverse order in April 2006, forcing Sen to deposit a sum
of nearly Rs 58 lakh which included interest on the money which had been
misappropriated.

With the government moving the impeachment motion, Justice Sen is certain to
be dismissed unless he chooses to resign — an option offered to him by CJI but
which he has chosen to turn down.

More Related Content

More from JudicialReform13

Complaint to y.k.sab re jagdish bhalla
Complaint to y.k.sab re jagdish bhallaComplaint to y.k.sab re jagdish bhalla
Complaint to y.k.sab re jagdish bhallaJudicialReform13
 
Cnn govt forced_to_withdraw_judges_assets_bill_in_rs
Cnn govt forced_to_withdraw_judges_assets_bill_in_rsCnn govt forced_to_withdraw_judges_assets_bill_in_rs
Cnn govt forced_to_withdraw_judges_assets_bill_in_rsJudicialReform13
 
Cji rules out_declaration_of_assests
Cji rules out_declaration_of_assestsCji rules out_declaration_of_assests
Cji rules out_declaration_of_assestsJudicialReform13
 
Cji not exempt_from_rti_purview_toi
Cji not exempt_from_rti_purview_toiCji not exempt_from_rti_purview_toi
Cji not exempt_from_rti_purview_toiJudicialReform13
 
Cjar letter to_vice_president
Cjar letter to_vice_presidentCjar letter to_vice_president
Cjar letter to_vice_presidentJudicialReform13
 
Cic judgement appointments_1
Cic judgement appointments_1Cic judgement appointments_1
Cic judgement appointments_1JudicialReform13
 
Cic judgement appointments
Cic judgement appointmentsCic judgement appointments
Cic judgement appointmentsJudicialReform13
 
Chief justice need_not_consult_collegium
Chief justice need_not_consult_collegiumChief justice need_not_consult_collegium
Chief justice need_not_consult_collegiumJudicialReform13
 
Cbi seeks nod_file_case_against_judge
Cbi seeks nod_file_case_against_judgeCbi seeks nod_file_case_against_judge
Cbi seeks nod_file_case_against_judgeJudicialReform13
 

More from JudicialReform13 (20)

Complaint to y.k.sab re jagdish bhalla
Complaint to y.k.sab re jagdish bhallaComplaint to y.k.sab re jagdish bhalla
Complaint to y.k.sab re jagdish bhalla
 
Coja resolution 22.9.01
Coja resolution 22.9.01Coja resolution 22.9.01
Coja resolution 22.9.01
 
Coja resolution 13.12.02
Coja resolution 13.12.02Coja resolution 13.12.02
Coja resolution 13.12.02
 
Cnn govt forced_to_withdraw_judges_assets_bill_in_rs
Cnn govt forced_to_withdraw_judges_assets_bill_in_rsCnn govt forced_to_withdraw_judges_assets_bill_in_rs
Cnn govt forced_to_withdraw_judges_assets_bill_in_rs
 
Cjirefuted
CjirefutedCjirefuted
Cjirefuted
 
Cji silence
Cji silenceCji silence
Cji silence
 
Cji rules out_declaration_of_assests
Cji rules out_declaration_of_assestsCji rules out_declaration_of_assests
Cji rules out_declaration_of_assests
 
Cji recomends impreach_ie
Cji recomends impreach_ieCji recomends impreach_ie
Cji recomends impreach_ie
 
Cji not exempt_from_rti_purview_toi
Cji not exempt_from_rti_purview_toiCji not exempt_from_rti_purview_toi
Cji not exempt_from_rti_purview_toi
 
Cjar letter to_vice_president
Cjar letter to_vice_presidentCjar letter to_vice_president
Cjar letter to_vice_president
 
Cjar brochure
Cjar brochureCjar brochure
Cjar brochure
 
Cja comments on bill
Cja   comments on billCja   comments on bill
Cja comments on bill
 
Cic decision hc_rtifees_2
Cic decision hc_rtifees_2Cic decision hc_rtifees_2
Cic decision hc_rtifees_2
 
Cic decision hc_rtifees_
Cic decision hc_rtifees_Cic decision hc_rtifees_
Cic decision hc_rtifees_
 
Cic judgement appointments_1
Cic judgement appointments_1Cic judgement appointments_1
Cic judgement appointments_1
 
Cic judgement appointments
Cic judgement appointmentsCic judgement appointments
Cic judgement appointments
 
Chief justice need_not_consult_collegium
Chief justice need_not_consult_collegiumChief justice need_not_consult_collegium
Chief justice need_not_consult_collegium
 
Changing trends pil
Changing trends pilChanging trends pil
Changing trends pil
 
Cbi submits report
Cbi submits reportCbi submits report
Cbi submits report
 
Cbi seeks nod_file_case_against_judge
Cbi seeks nod_file_case_against_judgeCbi seeks nod_file_case_against_judge
Cbi seeks nod_file_case_against_judge
 

Centre moves to_impreach_toi

  • 1. 9 Sep 2008, 0000 hrs IST,TNN Centre moves to impeach HC judge NEW DELHI: The Centre will move an impeachment motion against Calcutta High Court judge Soumitra Sen on a recommendation by Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan seeking his dismissal for corrupt practices which have brought disrepute to the judiciary. The government was forced to respond after the CJI's recommendations were reported in the media on Monday. Law minister H R Bhardwaj said an impeachment motion would be placed before Parliament on October 17 when it is scheduled to meet. The impeachment will follow an inquiry to be carried out by the presiding officers of both Houses. In a letter to the PM dated August 4, the CJI said a committee of senior judges had found Justice Sen to have misappropriated around Rs 24 lakh in a case where he had been appointed receiver in the 1990s. He was then a lawyer practising in the Calcutta HC and had deposited the money in his own accounts. He had also given a "false explanation" to the HC about Rs 25 lakh having been invested while the money had been withdrawn and invested in a venture that went into liquidation. The HC had passed an adverse order in April 2006, forcing Sen to deposit a sum of nearly Rs 58 lakh which included interest on the money which had been misappropriated. With the government moving the impeachment motion, Justice Sen is certain to be dismissed unless he chooses to resign — an option offered to him by CJI but which he has chosen to turn down.