The latest developments in California employment law, including wrongful termination, wage and hour, breach of contract, discrimination, harassment and retaliation, and trade secrets.
A pre-purchase home inspection by a professional company can benefit buyers and sellers by thoroughly examining the home's structure, systems and appliances to identify any issues, which reduces liability and helps protect investments. The company has been in business for over 40 years, employs qualified inspectors with construction expertise, and inspects over 600 items in each home to provide comprehensive yet understandable reports.
This newsletter summarizes two recent court cases:
1) The Ninth Circuit affirmed class certification in a gender discrimination case against Walmart brought by 1.5 million current and former female employees.
2) A California appellate court ruled that an in-house counsel for a company could be relieved of a $4 million default judgment against the company under a provision allowing relief for attorney mistake or neglect.
The document summarizes the results of the 2011 Turkey finals of the Global Management Challenge. It lists the top 8 teams that participated in the competition by their ranking and share price. The first place team was "Her eve DÄGÄTURK" and the second place team was "Avrakabdra - TFKB". It also notes that the 2011 Turkey champion will participate in the international finals to be held in Kiev, Ukraine from April 17-20, 2012.
New York is 2500 miles away and can be reached in half a minute by video call. London is 5500 miles away and can be reached in 1 minute by video call. Mumbai is 8700 miles away and can be reached in 2 to ? minutes by video call.
The document summarizes several recent California employment law cases:
1. In Hernandez v. Hillsides, Inc., the California Supreme Court found that although employees had a reasonable expectation of privacy in their shared office, installing a hidden camera without notifying them did not violate their privacy rights given the limited nature and purpose of the surveillance.
2. In Jeewarat v. Warner Bros. Entmāt, the Court of Appeal held that an executive involved in a car accident after returning home from a business conference could be considered within the scope of employment, reversing summary judgment for the employer.
3. In Sanchez v. County of San Bernardino, the Court of Appeal found that disclosing confidential details
The Supreme Court held that the city of New Haven, Connecticut violated Title VII by discarding the results of a firefighter promotion exam that had a disparate impact on minority candidates. The Court also held that under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, a plaintiff must prove that age was the "but-for" cause of an adverse employment action. Additionally, an appeals court upheld summary judgment for an art institute in a disability discrimination case, finding that the plaintiff failed to show his HIV status caused an adverse action or that his requested accommodation of priority course assignment was reasonable.
This argument is important in yellow color to illustrate the first.docxchristalgrieg
Ā
This argument is important in yellow color to illustrate the first argument that needs some modification and I put the color red and yellow it to illustrate
The second argument is developed by yellow color and needs to work in this argument
Argument
Pricewter house rule.
Explanation of the rule
Barabano case
What happened
The defendant violated the title VII when HIS questions to not hire Ms. Beck was motivated factor to not hire her:
1- The defendant questions were discriminatory because they were unrelated to unrelated to occupational qualification.
This case relates to Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins in which the court ruled in favor of the plaintiff after it was found that her gender played a key role in the employment decision process. Maureen E. Barbano v. Madison County 922 F.2d 139 (1990) also relates to this case after the court found out that by the defendant (Madison County) asking the plaintiff (Barbano) questions pertaining to how her husband would react in relation to her taking the job was found to be discriminatory and the court in favor of the plaintiff. Similarly to our case, Firstly, the issue of discrimination arises from the questions that plaintiff was subjected to answer by defendant the first being what her boyfriend would think of her working long hours at the firm and traveling with male attorneys. Secondly, she was asked whether she was planning on having children in the future and if so how would she manage professional and personal responsibilities. Mr. Herrera also stated that he loses at least one attorney each year to āthe babyā. In essence, these questions are not in any way part of the interview criteria and more importantly they are discriminatory and unrelated to occupational qualification. However, more importantly, none of the other interviewers cited the derailment in defandent 's questioning as they neither stopped the plaintiff from answering nor did they ask her about her other qualifications. Hence, the interviewing process was entirely discriminatory
1) To fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin; SUMMARY case heir and citation, and You should write this in your own way and not copy the case, understanding the subject then write it in your own way and then put a citation from where you took this
or
2) To limit, segregate, or classify his employees or applicants for employment in any way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect his status as an employee, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin : SUMMARY case heir and citation, and You should write this in your own way and not copy the case ,understanding the subject then write it in your own way and then put a citation ...
A pre-purchase home inspection by a professional company can benefit buyers and sellers by thoroughly examining the home's structure, systems and appliances to identify any issues, which reduces liability and helps protect investments. The company has been in business for over 40 years, employs qualified inspectors with construction expertise, and inspects over 600 items in each home to provide comprehensive yet understandable reports.
This newsletter summarizes two recent court cases:
1) The Ninth Circuit affirmed class certification in a gender discrimination case against Walmart brought by 1.5 million current and former female employees.
2) A California appellate court ruled that an in-house counsel for a company could be relieved of a $4 million default judgment against the company under a provision allowing relief for attorney mistake or neglect.
The document summarizes the results of the 2011 Turkey finals of the Global Management Challenge. It lists the top 8 teams that participated in the competition by their ranking and share price. The first place team was "Her eve DÄGÄTURK" and the second place team was "Avrakabdra - TFKB". It also notes that the 2011 Turkey champion will participate in the international finals to be held in Kiev, Ukraine from April 17-20, 2012.
New York is 2500 miles away and can be reached in half a minute by video call. London is 5500 miles away and can be reached in 1 minute by video call. Mumbai is 8700 miles away and can be reached in 2 to ? minutes by video call.
The document summarizes several recent California employment law cases:
1. In Hernandez v. Hillsides, Inc., the California Supreme Court found that although employees had a reasonable expectation of privacy in their shared office, installing a hidden camera without notifying them did not violate their privacy rights given the limited nature and purpose of the surveillance.
2. In Jeewarat v. Warner Bros. Entmāt, the Court of Appeal held that an executive involved in a car accident after returning home from a business conference could be considered within the scope of employment, reversing summary judgment for the employer.
3. In Sanchez v. County of San Bernardino, the Court of Appeal found that disclosing confidential details
The Supreme Court held that the city of New Haven, Connecticut violated Title VII by discarding the results of a firefighter promotion exam that had a disparate impact on minority candidates. The Court also held that under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, a plaintiff must prove that age was the "but-for" cause of an adverse employment action. Additionally, an appeals court upheld summary judgment for an art institute in a disability discrimination case, finding that the plaintiff failed to show his HIV status caused an adverse action or that his requested accommodation of priority course assignment was reasonable.
This argument is important in yellow color to illustrate the first.docxchristalgrieg
Ā
This argument is important in yellow color to illustrate the first argument that needs some modification and I put the color red and yellow it to illustrate
The second argument is developed by yellow color and needs to work in this argument
Argument
Pricewter house rule.
Explanation of the rule
Barabano case
What happened
The defendant violated the title VII when HIS questions to not hire Ms. Beck was motivated factor to not hire her:
1- The defendant questions were discriminatory because they were unrelated to unrelated to occupational qualification.
This case relates to Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins in which the court ruled in favor of the plaintiff after it was found that her gender played a key role in the employment decision process. Maureen E. Barbano v. Madison County 922 F.2d 139 (1990) also relates to this case after the court found out that by the defendant (Madison County) asking the plaintiff (Barbano) questions pertaining to how her husband would react in relation to her taking the job was found to be discriminatory and the court in favor of the plaintiff. Similarly to our case, Firstly, the issue of discrimination arises from the questions that plaintiff was subjected to answer by defendant the first being what her boyfriend would think of her working long hours at the firm and traveling with male attorneys. Secondly, she was asked whether she was planning on having children in the future and if so how would she manage professional and personal responsibilities. Mr. Herrera also stated that he loses at least one attorney each year to āthe babyā. In essence, these questions are not in any way part of the interview criteria and more importantly they are discriminatory and unrelated to occupational qualification. However, more importantly, none of the other interviewers cited the derailment in defandent 's questioning as they neither stopped the plaintiff from answering nor did they ask her about her other qualifications. Hence, the interviewing process was entirely discriminatory
1) To fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin; SUMMARY case heir and citation, and You should write this in your own way and not copy the case, understanding the subject then write it in your own way and then put a citation from where you took this
or
2) To limit, segregate, or classify his employees or applicants for employment in any way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect his status as an employee, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin : SUMMARY case heir and citation, and You should write this in your own way and not copy the case ,understanding the subject then write it in your own way and then put a citation ...
Choose one of the options below for discussion. Be sure to elabora.docxrusselldayna
Ā
Choose one of the options below for discussion. Be sure to elaborate and explain. I choose p>81
Waffles and Workersā Rights (EEOC v. Waffle House, p. 81)
Read about arbitration law in Chapter 4 and Case 4-3 in your textbook, and do some online research on the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). Then discuss the following:
What is the EEOCās role in regard to business? Does the court say that the EEOC trumps the arbitration contract between the employee and the employer? If so, why? What are the pros and cons of arbitration agreements? Do you think arbitration agreements between big companies and low wage earners who are uninformed about the law are truly fair? If you have any experiences at work with discrimination policies or EEOC trainings, share those experiences.
Dogs and Dream Therapists (Hagen v. Field, pp. 65 (question 7), and Jones v. Williams, p. 43 (question 9)
P65Ā
The plaintiff, a Texas resident, and the defendants, Colorado residents, were cat breeders who met at a cat show in Colorado. Subsequently, the plaintiff sent two cats to the defendants in Colorado for breeding and sent a third cat to them to be sold. A dispute over the return of the two breeding cats arose, and the plaintiff filed suit against the defendants in Texas. The defendants alleged that the Texas court lacked personal jurisdiction over them because they did not have minimum contacts within the state of Texas.
Read both cases and discuss legal issues for the court, focusing on in each. Summarize what factors the court looks at in determining where a case can be brought. What was the decision in each case, and do you think the decision was correct? Why or why not?
ASE
4-3 p81
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. WAFFLE HOUSE, INC.
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT 534 U.S. 279 (2002)
All employees of Waffle House had to sign an agreement requiring employment disputes to be settled by binding arbitration. After Eric Baker suffered a seizure and was fired by Waffle House, he filed a discrimination charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) alleging that his discharge violated the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) under Title VII. The EEOC subsequently filed an enforcement suit, to which Baker was not a party, alleging that Waffle House's employment practices, including Baker's discharge ābecause of his disability,ā violated the ADA. The EEOC sought the following: an injunction to āeradicate the effects of [Waffle House's] past and present unlawful employment practicesā; specific relief designed to make Baker whole, including back pay, reinstatement, and compensatory damages; and punitive damages.
Waffle House sought to dismiss the EEOC's suit and compel arbitration because of the binding arbitration clause signed by Baker. The District Court denied Waffle House's motion to dismiss. The Fourth Circuit agreed with the District Court that the arbitration agreement between Baker and Waffle House did not foreclose ...
2013 Best Best & Krieger Labor & Employment Update: Discrimination, Harassmen...Best Best and Krieger LLP
Ā
1) The Ninth Circuit found that a sheriff's department lieutenant who oversaw contract police services for a city did not have a policymaking role and was therefore protected from retaliation based on his political speech opposing the sheriff in an election.
2) The Ninth Circuit also ruled that if one plaintiff in a class action alleging age discrimination exhausted administrative remedies by filing a complaint, other similarly situated plaintiffs could "piggyback" on that complaint to satisfy the exhaustion requirement.
3) In a third case, the Ninth Circuit held that statistical evidence of disparate treatment can support an inference of discrimination to establish a prima facie case, even if it does not address the employer's stated nondiscriminatory reasons for the adverse actions.
This case involves the termination of a unionized employee, Shawn Brightly, for dishonesty. Specifically, Brightly claimed paid sick leave from his employer but was discovered participating in a curling event during that time. The employer alleges Brightly was dishonest in his sick leave claim and interactions with HR and management. The union grieved Brightly's termination.
The arbitrator relied on previous arbitration cases that established dishonesty, abuse of sick leave policies, and lack of contrition as justification for termination. The arbitrator ultimately dismissed the union's grievance, finding Brightly's actions were calculated and repeated dishonesty that destroyed the employment relationship.
This document is an answer filed by Illinois Midwest Insurance Agency, LLC to the applicant Marcela Acosta's petition for reconsideration of a workers' compensation claim. It summarizes the case history, including that Acosta alleged a cumulative trauma injury and is receiving temporary total disability benefits. It disputes the rate that benefits are being paid at. The answer argues that the original ruling should stand as it is based on substantial evidence, including Acosta's tax documents showing lower earnings than she claims, while she provided no documentation to support her testimony claiming higher earnings. It aims to show the original ruling was reasonably based on the evidence presented.
Paul Windust is a partner at Berding | Weil LLP specializing in community association law, construction defect, real estate, and business litigation. He has over 25 years of legal experience representing homeowners associations, defending directors and management companies, and litigating construction defect claims, CC&R violations, and governance disputes. Some of his significant cases include settling a $50,000 per unit construction defect claim and obtaining a $165,000 attorney fee award for an association after a 3-week trial.
This resume summarizes the education and experience of George N. Elfter, Esq. It indicates that he received a J.D. from Georgetown University Law Center in 1991 and a B.S. from Columbia University in 1984. It provides details of his bar admissions in DC, Maryland, and other federal courts. The resume describes his experience from 1991-2002 at Wolk & Neuman law firm and his private practice since 2002, highlighting several cases he has litigated involving torts, employment law, and criminal defense. It also lists other skills such as understanding medical topics from his dental education and reading French.
Brown reply memo support motion to dismissJRachelle
Ā
This document is the Brown Defendants' reply memorandum in support of their motion to dismiss portions of Howard Stern's amended complaint. It argues that the motion to dismiss is not precluded by the court's prior ruling allowing the amended complaint. It also argues that California procedural law, including its probate code and publicity rights statute, does not apply in this South Carolina district court case. Finally, it asserts that the publicity rights statute is not applicable to the Brown Defendants' alleged actions of providing materials to another law firm.
The document summarizes recent developments in Tennessee's workers' compensation system. Governor Bill Haslam plans substantial reforms in 2013 based on consultants' recommendations, including moving the system from courts to an administrative process and overhauling how permanent partial disability is calculated. The consultants also recommended interpreting laws neutrally instead of favoring employees. Recent court cases regarding returning to work and fraud are summarized. New accountability measures were added to unemployment insurance laws in 2012.
Stern Response to motion to dismiss 8-20-10JRachelle
Ā
This document is the Executor's response in opposition to a motion to dismiss filed by Susan M. Brown and The Law Offices of Susan M. Brown. The Executor argues that the motion to dismiss should be denied for three reasons: 1) Brown is raising the same arguments that the court already rejected in granting leave to amend the complaint, 2) the Executor has properly stated claims for both statutory and common law misappropriation of publicity rights, and 3) even if the motion to dismiss is granted, there are six other valid causes of action against Brown that would remain in the case.
This document provides biographical information about Donna Doblick, including her education, areas of legal practice, experience, honors and awards. Some key details:
- She is an appellate attorney and counsel at Reed Smith LLP based in Pittsburgh.
- Her appellate practice focuses on complex commercial litigation, class action defense, and questions of foreign law. She has over 20 years of litigation experience at both the trial and appellate levels.
- She received her law degree from the University of Chicago Law School and clerked for Judge Frank H. Easterbrook of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
- Her notable cases include successfully defending antitrust, business tort, and fraud claims on behalf of
The Claimant appealed the Employment Tribunal's decision dismissing his claims of constructive dismissal and discrimination on the grounds of race. The Tribunal found:
1) The Claimant's appeal of the Tribunal's conclusions on constructive dismissal and four specific allegations of discrimination failed based on the facts.
2) The Tribunal adequately set out the facts it found and explained its reasons for dismissing the claims and finding against the Claimant on the allegations.
3) Specifically, the Tribunal provided detailed explanations for rejecting the Claimant's allegations regarding sick pay, his arrest at court, the handling of his grievance, and the denial of a trip sheet related to his duties on the day of his arrest.
FT Week 7 Crital Thinking in the Legal EnvironmentFelicia Thomas
Ā
The document provides an analysis of the Liebeck v. McDonald's Corporation and Pearson v. Custom Cleaners cases. It summarizes the key facts and legal issues of each case. In Liebeck, the plaintiff was severely burned by McDonald's coffee and sued for product liability. In Pearson, the plaintiff sued a dry cleaners for $54 million over lost pants. The document analyzes the applicable laws in each case and whether the court decisions were appropriate. It also discusses the ethical issues raised, such as punitive damages and economic theories of harm.
1. Ā Potter v. New Brunswick Legal Aid Services Commission, 201.docxpaynetawnya
Ā
1. Ā Potter v. New Brunswick Legal Aid Services Commission, 2015 SCC 10
Suspension with pay may constitute āconstructive dismissalā
Mr. Potter was the Executive Director of the New Brunswick Legal Aid Services Commission. While the parties were negotiating a buyout of Mr. Potterās contract, Mr. Potter commenced a sick leave. In response, the employer wrote to Mr. Potter to advise him not to return to work until he was provided further direction. In the meanwhile, Mr. Potter was suspended with pay, and his powers were delegated to someone else. Mr. Potter sued for constructive dismissal.
The Supreme Court of Canada agreed with Mr. Potter, finding that Mr. Potter had been constructively dismissed, ā[i]n light of the indefinite duration of the suspension, of the fact that the Commission failed to act in good faith insofar as it withheld valid business reasons from Mr. Potter, and of the Commissionās concealed intention to have Mr. Potter terminated.ā
2. Ā Styles v. Alberta Investment Management Company, 2015 ABQB 621
Employers owe a duty of good faith when determining Long-Term Incentive Plan entitlements post-termination
After approximately three years of employment, Mr. Styles was terminated on a without cause basis. Pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Styles was paid three months of salary.
However, during the course of his employment, Mr. Styles became eligible to participate in (and did participate in) the Defendantās Long Term Incentive Plan. Upon termination, Mr. Styles was advised that ā[a]s per policy, no further payment on Annual Incentive Plan (AIP) or Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) will be made).ā
Despite the fact that the LTIP plan required Mr. Styles to be āactively employedā on the date that the monies were paid, Mr. Styles sued his former employer, citing, among other things, the fact that he had been dismissed shortly before the payout date.
Deciding in favour of Mr. Styles, the Court ordered an LTIP payout in the amount of $444,205 as a part of Mr. Stylesā severance on the basis that the employerās strict reliance on the wording of the LTIP provision would violate the duty of good faith contractual performance that it owed to Mr. Styles (as recently established by the Supreme Court of Canada in its 2014 Bhasin v. Hrynew decision). In particular, the court held that ā[w]hen an employment contract includes a condition for the receipt by an employee of a benefit under the contract and the employer has the discretion, pursuant to the terms of the contract, to frustrate the satisfaction of that condition, it becomes even more important for that discretion to be exercised fairly, reasonably and not arbitrarily.ā
When is the exercise of "discretion" required to be reasonable?3.Ā O.P.T. v. Presteve Foods, 2015 HRTO 675
New high-water mark in general damages award for human rights violations
The Applicants, O.P.T. and M.P.T. were temporary foreign workers who had been employed by Presteve Foods for approximately nine ...
Fleet v. Bank of America case from California Court of AppealLegalDocsPro
Ā
This Fleet v. Bank of America case was recently decided by a California Court of Appeal. This case was decided by Division Three of the Fourth District Court of Appeal on August 25, 2014, on September 23, 2014 the Court granted the request of several parties for publication. The case involved allegations by the Fleets of fraud on the part of Bank of America during the loan modification process.
The Court of Appeal reversed the Judgment entered in the case and reversed the order sustaining the demurrer to the cause of action for fraud as to Bank of America and several other individual defendants, as well as reversing the order sustaining demurrers to the breach of contract and promissory estoppel causes of action against Bank of America athough the Court did affirm the order sustaining the demurrers without leave to amend against several other defendants including Recon Trust. The Court also affirmed the order sustaining the demurrer to the cause of action for accounting without leave to amend. This case is very good news in my opinion as this case may represent a turning point as it is the only published case from California that I am aware of in which an appeals Court appears to be at least considering the possibility that the big banks may be engaging in a pattern of fraud and deceit.
A-4 Appendix A Alternate Case problemsāChapter 2App.docxransayo
Ā
A-4 Appendix A: Alternate Case problemsāChapter 2
Appendix A: Alternate Case ProblemsāChapter 2 A-3
Alternate Case Problems
Chapter 2
The Court System
2-1. Jury Selection. Benjamin Omoruyi was convicted in a federal district court for the possession of counterfeit securities in violation of federal law. Omoruyi appealed his conāviction to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, arguing that the district court erred by permitting the government to peremptorily challenge female prospective jurors on the basis of gender. (In a previous case decided by the Ninth Circuit, that court had held that equal-protection principles prohibit striking potential jurors on the basis of genāder.) The first government peremptory challenge was exercised against an unmarried white woman, and the second was exercised against an unmarried black woman. Omoruyi objected to the second challenge on the basis that it was racially disācriminatory. In response to the district courtās request to explain the challenge, the government counāsel responded: āBecause she was a single female and my concern, frankly, is that she, like the other juror I struck, is single and given defendantās good looks would be attracted to the defendant.ā The district court denied Omoruyiās motion for a new jury. In reāsponse to Omoruyiās allegations on appeal, the government argued that the peremptory strikes were based on marital status, not gender. How should the court decide? Discuss fully. [United States v. Omoruyi, 7 F.3d 880 (9th Cir. 1993)]
2-2. Discovery. Joseph Stout, while on the job as a construction worker, fell from a beam that he was attempting to secure to a steel column. As a result of the fall, Stout sustained injuries that rendered him a paraplegic. Stout brought suit against his emāployer, A. M. Sunrise Construction Co., and Central Rent-A-Crane, Inc., for damages. Prior to the trial, a number of discovery motions were filed by the defendants, who sought detailed ināformation on the nature of the accident and the injuries incurred. Stout repeatedly failed to respond to these requests, even when the trial court ordered him to do so. Finally, the trial court dismissed the action because of Stoutās failure to reāspond. Stout appealed the dismissal. On appeal, Stout claimed that the trial court had abused its discretion by disāmissing his action against the defendants, thus depriving him of his right to be heard in court. What will the appellate court decide? [Stout v. A. M. Sunrise Construction Co., 505 N.E.2d 500 (Ind.App. 1987)]
2-3. Motion for Summary Judgment. Mary Sabo suffered injuries in an automobile acciādent caused by Daniel Hoag, an intoxicated driver. Hoag had just left Peoples Restaurant after having consumed a large number of drinks. Sabo sued Peoples for damages, allegāing that the restaurant had violated a state statute that provided that any person who āknowingly servesā an individual who is āhabitually ad.
This document summarizes key information from the June 2010 issue of TN Workers' Comp Chronicle, a legal publication about Tennessee workers' compensation law and cases. It discusses a new law that grants the Department of Labor primary jurisdiction over future medical benefit disputes. It also outlines upcoming certification requirements for adjusters, bill reviewers, and supervisors handling TN workers' comp claims. Finally, it summarizes several recent TN appellate court cases related to issues like compensability of parking lot injuries, statute of limitations for hearing loss claims, and the willful misconduct defense.
Alistair Jones Motion for Summary JudgmentAlistair Jones
Ā
Fred Northrop filed a motion for summary judgment against Acme Insurance in a lawsuit alleging sexual discrimination by Northrop's supervisor Helen Redmond. Northrop claims that Redmond offered him a promotion in exchange for sexual favors, and then denied him the promotion and spread false rumors about him after he refused. Northrop argues that as Redmond's actions were in her official capacity as his supervisor for Acme, Acme is liable for sexual discrimination. Northrop is seeking damages, back pay, reinstatement to the denied position, and attorney's fees if found to have experienced discrimination as a motivating factor in being denied the promotion.
Medical EthicsUtilitarianismConcluding Kantās Th.docxARIV4
Ā
Medical Ethics
Utilitarianism
Concluding Kantās Theory
Moral Rights ā
He expresses these as positive and negative rights. Or āfreedom fromā and āfreedom toā
The rights to privacy, to not being killed, to not have our stuff taken from us, etc are all seen as negative rights.
The rights to education, medical care, food, housing and a fair trial are all seen as positive rights.
Kant points out that without both types of rights the categorical imperative would not work. In other words anything that you could will to universal law must not violate either set of rights.
Utilitarianism: Bentham
Bentham points out that two of the governing impulses in human nature are those of pain and pleasure. Within this we have a natural inclination towards pleasure and an avoidance of pain.
Bentham said that the purpose of morality is to maximize human happiness, as measured by pleasure and pain.
This being said Bentham didnāt have a strict structure of right and wrong but only that the right action was dependent upon the yield of greatest net happiness of all the alternatives.
Utility Principle
Idea put forth by John Stuart Mill. Essentially it states that the right act is that which creates the greatest good for the greatest number.
The most basic premise of utilitarianism is that acts are right in proportion to the amount of pleasure they produce while minimizing the amount of pain.
Moral Rights and the Harm Principle
Mill held that individual freedom be it of thought, speech, taste, action and political assembly was of the highest importance.
Individual freedom could only be curtailed by the harm principle.
āā¦the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others.ā (45)
To prevent harm to others individual freedoms can be limited.
Bentham in Bhutan
In the 1970ās the King of Bhutan decided that the Gross National Product (GNP) wasnāt the best way to determine the economic health of his country. He decided that using a system to determine the GNH (Gross National Happiness) was a more appropriate measure for the health of his nation. After developing a complex way of measuring a number of factors it was put into place. With updates done every couple of years.
Social interests
Utilitarianism is much different from egoism in that it wants to put the focus on maximum collective pleasure and minimum collective pain. In this they mean that all persons impacted by a decision or action must be taken into account to determine the correct action.
Preference Satisfaction
Not all pleasures are equal and often times it is said that not all potential pleasures need be judge on the same scale. It is pointed out that often times it is whether the greater problem is not fulfilling ones preferences because we no longer have that option.
And as Peter Singer points out we are not all equal actors either with regard to potential pleasures or ...
Harry W.R. Chamberlain II is an experienced litigator and appellate attorney based in Los Angeles. He has represented major companies, public entities, and professionals in complex litigation for 35 years. Chamberlain is certified as an appellate specialist and has argued hundreds of appeals. He serves on the Board of Trustees of the Los Angeles County Bar Association and is frequently engaged as an expert witness on legal issues. In addition to his litigation practice, Chamberlain lectures and writes extensively on topics related to appellate law, professional liability, and alternative dispute resolution.
2013 Best Best & Krieger Labor & Employment Update: Wage & Hour Case StudiesBest Best and Krieger LLP
Ā
This document summarizes three key labor and employment law cases from 2013:
1) Brinker v. Superior Court clarified that employers must provide meal periods but are not required to ensure employees do not work during these periods. Employers must also provide specified rest periods.
2) Hernandez v. Chipotle Mexican Grill reaffirmed the holding in Brinker that employers are obligated to provide, not police, meal breaks.
3) Kirby v. Immoos Fire Protection ruled that attorneys' fees cannot be awarded for claims involving alleged rest or meal period violations.
Presentation by Herman Kienhuis (Curiosity VC) on Investing in AI for ABS Alu...Herman Kienhuis
Ā
Presentation by Herman Kienhuis (Curiosity VC) on developments in AI, the venture capital investment landscape and Curiosity VC's approach to investing, at the alumni event of Amsterdam Business School (University of Amsterdam) on June 13, 2024 in Amsterdam.
Discover innovative uses of Revit in urban planning and design, enhancing city landscapes with advanced architectural solutions. Understand how architectural firms are using Revit to transform how processes and outcomes within urban planning and design fields look. They are supplementing work and putting in value through speed and imagination that the architects and planners are placing into composing progressive urban areas that are not only colorful but also pragmatic.
More Related Content
Similar to California Employment Law Notes January 2010
Choose one of the options below for discussion. Be sure to elabora.docxrusselldayna
Ā
Choose one of the options below for discussion. Be sure to elaborate and explain. I choose p>81
Waffles and Workersā Rights (EEOC v. Waffle House, p. 81)
Read about arbitration law in Chapter 4 and Case 4-3 in your textbook, and do some online research on the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). Then discuss the following:
What is the EEOCās role in regard to business? Does the court say that the EEOC trumps the arbitration contract between the employee and the employer? If so, why? What are the pros and cons of arbitration agreements? Do you think arbitration agreements between big companies and low wage earners who are uninformed about the law are truly fair? If you have any experiences at work with discrimination policies or EEOC trainings, share those experiences.
Dogs and Dream Therapists (Hagen v. Field, pp. 65 (question 7), and Jones v. Williams, p. 43 (question 9)
P65Ā
The plaintiff, a Texas resident, and the defendants, Colorado residents, were cat breeders who met at a cat show in Colorado. Subsequently, the plaintiff sent two cats to the defendants in Colorado for breeding and sent a third cat to them to be sold. A dispute over the return of the two breeding cats arose, and the plaintiff filed suit against the defendants in Texas. The defendants alleged that the Texas court lacked personal jurisdiction over them because they did not have minimum contacts within the state of Texas.
Read both cases and discuss legal issues for the court, focusing on in each. Summarize what factors the court looks at in determining where a case can be brought. What was the decision in each case, and do you think the decision was correct? Why or why not?
ASE
4-3 p81
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. WAFFLE HOUSE, INC.
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT 534 U.S. 279 (2002)
All employees of Waffle House had to sign an agreement requiring employment disputes to be settled by binding arbitration. After Eric Baker suffered a seizure and was fired by Waffle House, he filed a discrimination charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) alleging that his discharge violated the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) under Title VII. The EEOC subsequently filed an enforcement suit, to which Baker was not a party, alleging that Waffle House's employment practices, including Baker's discharge ābecause of his disability,ā violated the ADA. The EEOC sought the following: an injunction to āeradicate the effects of [Waffle House's] past and present unlawful employment practicesā; specific relief designed to make Baker whole, including back pay, reinstatement, and compensatory damages; and punitive damages.
Waffle House sought to dismiss the EEOC's suit and compel arbitration because of the binding arbitration clause signed by Baker. The District Court denied Waffle House's motion to dismiss. The Fourth Circuit agreed with the District Court that the arbitration agreement between Baker and Waffle House did not foreclose ...
2013 Best Best & Krieger Labor & Employment Update: Discrimination, Harassmen...Best Best and Krieger LLP
Ā
1) The Ninth Circuit found that a sheriff's department lieutenant who oversaw contract police services for a city did not have a policymaking role and was therefore protected from retaliation based on his political speech opposing the sheriff in an election.
2) The Ninth Circuit also ruled that if one plaintiff in a class action alleging age discrimination exhausted administrative remedies by filing a complaint, other similarly situated plaintiffs could "piggyback" on that complaint to satisfy the exhaustion requirement.
3) In a third case, the Ninth Circuit held that statistical evidence of disparate treatment can support an inference of discrimination to establish a prima facie case, even if it does not address the employer's stated nondiscriminatory reasons for the adverse actions.
This case involves the termination of a unionized employee, Shawn Brightly, for dishonesty. Specifically, Brightly claimed paid sick leave from his employer but was discovered participating in a curling event during that time. The employer alleges Brightly was dishonest in his sick leave claim and interactions with HR and management. The union grieved Brightly's termination.
The arbitrator relied on previous arbitration cases that established dishonesty, abuse of sick leave policies, and lack of contrition as justification for termination. The arbitrator ultimately dismissed the union's grievance, finding Brightly's actions were calculated and repeated dishonesty that destroyed the employment relationship.
This document is an answer filed by Illinois Midwest Insurance Agency, LLC to the applicant Marcela Acosta's petition for reconsideration of a workers' compensation claim. It summarizes the case history, including that Acosta alleged a cumulative trauma injury and is receiving temporary total disability benefits. It disputes the rate that benefits are being paid at. The answer argues that the original ruling should stand as it is based on substantial evidence, including Acosta's tax documents showing lower earnings than she claims, while she provided no documentation to support her testimony claiming higher earnings. It aims to show the original ruling was reasonably based on the evidence presented.
Paul Windust is a partner at Berding | Weil LLP specializing in community association law, construction defect, real estate, and business litigation. He has over 25 years of legal experience representing homeowners associations, defending directors and management companies, and litigating construction defect claims, CC&R violations, and governance disputes. Some of his significant cases include settling a $50,000 per unit construction defect claim and obtaining a $165,000 attorney fee award for an association after a 3-week trial.
This resume summarizes the education and experience of George N. Elfter, Esq. It indicates that he received a J.D. from Georgetown University Law Center in 1991 and a B.S. from Columbia University in 1984. It provides details of his bar admissions in DC, Maryland, and other federal courts. The resume describes his experience from 1991-2002 at Wolk & Neuman law firm and his private practice since 2002, highlighting several cases he has litigated involving torts, employment law, and criminal defense. It also lists other skills such as understanding medical topics from his dental education and reading French.
Brown reply memo support motion to dismissJRachelle
Ā
This document is the Brown Defendants' reply memorandum in support of their motion to dismiss portions of Howard Stern's amended complaint. It argues that the motion to dismiss is not precluded by the court's prior ruling allowing the amended complaint. It also argues that California procedural law, including its probate code and publicity rights statute, does not apply in this South Carolina district court case. Finally, it asserts that the publicity rights statute is not applicable to the Brown Defendants' alleged actions of providing materials to another law firm.
The document summarizes recent developments in Tennessee's workers' compensation system. Governor Bill Haslam plans substantial reforms in 2013 based on consultants' recommendations, including moving the system from courts to an administrative process and overhauling how permanent partial disability is calculated. The consultants also recommended interpreting laws neutrally instead of favoring employees. Recent court cases regarding returning to work and fraud are summarized. New accountability measures were added to unemployment insurance laws in 2012.
Stern Response to motion to dismiss 8-20-10JRachelle
Ā
This document is the Executor's response in opposition to a motion to dismiss filed by Susan M. Brown and The Law Offices of Susan M. Brown. The Executor argues that the motion to dismiss should be denied for three reasons: 1) Brown is raising the same arguments that the court already rejected in granting leave to amend the complaint, 2) the Executor has properly stated claims for both statutory and common law misappropriation of publicity rights, and 3) even if the motion to dismiss is granted, there are six other valid causes of action against Brown that would remain in the case.
This document provides biographical information about Donna Doblick, including her education, areas of legal practice, experience, honors and awards. Some key details:
- She is an appellate attorney and counsel at Reed Smith LLP based in Pittsburgh.
- Her appellate practice focuses on complex commercial litigation, class action defense, and questions of foreign law. She has over 20 years of litigation experience at both the trial and appellate levels.
- She received her law degree from the University of Chicago Law School and clerked for Judge Frank H. Easterbrook of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
- Her notable cases include successfully defending antitrust, business tort, and fraud claims on behalf of
The Claimant appealed the Employment Tribunal's decision dismissing his claims of constructive dismissal and discrimination on the grounds of race. The Tribunal found:
1) The Claimant's appeal of the Tribunal's conclusions on constructive dismissal and four specific allegations of discrimination failed based on the facts.
2) The Tribunal adequately set out the facts it found and explained its reasons for dismissing the claims and finding against the Claimant on the allegations.
3) Specifically, the Tribunal provided detailed explanations for rejecting the Claimant's allegations regarding sick pay, his arrest at court, the handling of his grievance, and the denial of a trip sheet related to his duties on the day of his arrest.
FT Week 7 Crital Thinking in the Legal EnvironmentFelicia Thomas
Ā
The document provides an analysis of the Liebeck v. McDonald's Corporation and Pearson v. Custom Cleaners cases. It summarizes the key facts and legal issues of each case. In Liebeck, the plaintiff was severely burned by McDonald's coffee and sued for product liability. In Pearson, the plaintiff sued a dry cleaners for $54 million over lost pants. The document analyzes the applicable laws in each case and whether the court decisions were appropriate. It also discusses the ethical issues raised, such as punitive damages and economic theories of harm.
1. Ā Potter v. New Brunswick Legal Aid Services Commission, 201.docxpaynetawnya
Ā
1. Ā Potter v. New Brunswick Legal Aid Services Commission, 2015 SCC 10
Suspension with pay may constitute āconstructive dismissalā
Mr. Potter was the Executive Director of the New Brunswick Legal Aid Services Commission. While the parties were negotiating a buyout of Mr. Potterās contract, Mr. Potter commenced a sick leave. In response, the employer wrote to Mr. Potter to advise him not to return to work until he was provided further direction. In the meanwhile, Mr. Potter was suspended with pay, and his powers were delegated to someone else. Mr. Potter sued for constructive dismissal.
The Supreme Court of Canada agreed with Mr. Potter, finding that Mr. Potter had been constructively dismissed, ā[i]n light of the indefinite duration of the suspension, of the fact that the Commission failed to act in good faith insofar as it withheld valid business reasons from Mr. Potter, and of the Commissionās concealed intention to have Mr. Potter terminated.ā
2. Ā Styles v. Alberta Investment Management Company, 2015 ABQB 621
Employers owe a duty of good faith when determining Long-Term Incentive Plan entitlements post-termination
After approximately three years of employment, Mr. Styles was terminated on a without cause basis. Pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Styles was paid three months of salary.
However, during the course of his employment, Mr. Styles became eligible to participate in (and did participate in) the Defendantās Long Term Incentive Plan. Upon termination, Mr. Styles was advised that ā[a]s per policy, no further payment on Annual Incentive Plan (AIP) or Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) will be made).ā
Despite the fact that the LTIP plan required Mr. Styles to be āactively employedā on the date that the monies were paid, Mr. Styles sued his former employer, citing, among other things, the fact that he had been dismissed shortly before the payout date.
Deciding in favour of Mr. Styles, the Court ordered an LTIP payout in the amount of $444,205 as a part of Mr. Stylesā severance on the basis that the employerās strict reliance on the wording of the LTIP provision would violate the duty of good faith contractual performance that it owed to Mr. Styles (as recently established by the Supreme Court of Canada in its 2014 Bhasin v. Hrynew decision). In particular, the court held that ā[w]hen an employment contract includes a condition for the receipt by an employee of a benefit under the contract and the employer has the discretion, pursuant to the terms of the contract, to frustrate the satisfaction of that condition, it becomes even more important for that discretion to be exercised fairly, reasonably and not arbitrarily.ā
When is the exercise of "discretion" required to be reasonable?3.Ā O.P.T. v. Presteve Foods, 2015 HRTO 675
New high-water mark in general damages award for human rights violations
The Applicants, O.P.T. and M.P.T. were temporary foreign workers who had been employed by Presteve Foods for approximately nine ...
Fleet v. Bank of America case from California Court of AppealLegalDocsPro
Ā
This Fleet v. Bank of America case was recently decided by a California Court of Appeal. This case was decided by Division Three of the Fourth District Court of Appeal on August 25, 2014, on September 23, 2014 the Court granted the request of several parties for publication. The case involved allegations by the Fleets of fraud on the part of Bank of America during the loan modification process.
The Court of Appeal reversed the Judgment entered in the case and reversed the order sustaining the demurrer to the cause of action for fraud as to Bank of America and several other individual defendants, as well as reversing the order sustaining demurrers to the breach of contract and promissory estoppel causes of action against Bank of America athough the Court did affirm the order sustaining the demurrers without leave to amend against several other defendants including Recon Trust. The Court also affirmed the order sustaining the demurrer to the cause of action for accounting without leave to amend. This case is very good news in my opinion as this case may represent a turning point as it is the only published case from California that I am aware of in which an appeals Court appears to be at least considering the possibility that the big banks may be engaging in a pattern of fraud and deceit.
A-4 Appendix A Alternate Case problemsāChapter 2App.docxransayo
Ā
A-4 Appendix A: Alternate Case problemsāChapter 2
Appendix A: Alternate Case ProblemsāChapter 2 A-3
Alternate Case Problems
Chapter 2
The Court System
2-1. Jury Selection. Benjamin Omoruyi was convicted in a federal district court for the possession of counterfeit securities in violation of federal law. Omoruyi appealed his conāviction to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, arguing that the district court erred by permitting the government to peremptorily challenge female prospective jurors on the basis of gender. (In a previous case decided by the Ninth Circuit, that court had held that equal-protection principles prohibit striking potential jurors on the basis of genāder.) The first government peremptory challenge was exercised against an unmarried white woman, and the second was exercised against an unmarried black woman. Omoruyi objected to the second challenge on the basis that it was racially disācriminatory. In response to the district courtās request to explain the challenge, the government counāsel responded: āBecause she was a single female and my concern, frankly, is that she, like the other juror I struck, is single and given defendantās good looks would be attracted to the defendant.ā The district court denied Omoruyiās motion for a new jury. In reāsponse to Omoruyiās allegations on appeal, the government argued that the peremptory strikes were based on marital status, not gender. How should the court decide? Discuss fully. [United States v. Omoruyi, 7 F.3d 880 (9th Cir. 1993)]
2-2. Discovery. Joseph Stout, while on the job as a construction worker, fell from a beam that he was attempting to secure to a steel column. As a result of the fall, Stout sustained injuries that rendered him a paraplegic. Stout brought suit against his emāployer, A. M. Sunrise Construction Co., and Central Rent-A-Crane, Inc., for damages. Prior to the trial, a number of discovery motions were filed by the defendants, who sought detailed ināformation on the nature of the accident and the injuries incurred. Stout repeatedly failed to respond to these requests, even when the trial court ordered him to do so. Finally, the trial court dismissed the action because of Stoutās failure to reāspond. Stout appealed the dismissal. On appeal, Stout claimed that the trial court had abused its discretion by disāmissing his action against the defendants, thus depriving him of his right to be heard in court. What will the appellate court decide? [Stout v. A. M. Sunrise Construction Co., 505 N.E.2d 500 (Ind.App. 1987)]
2-3. Motion for Summary Judgment. Mary Sabo suffered injuries in an automobile acciādent caused by Daniel Hoag, an intoxicated driver. Hoag had just left Peoples Restaurant after having consumed a large number of drinks. Sabo sued Peoples for damages, allegāing that the restaurant had violated a state statute that provided that any person who āknowingly servesā an individual who is āhabitually ad.
This document summarizes key information from the June 2010 issue of TN Workers' Comp Chronicle, a legal publication about Tennessee workers' compensation law and cases. It discusses a new law that grants the Department of Labor primary jurisdiction over future medical benefit disputes. It also outlines upcoming certification requirements for adjusters, bill reviewers, and supervisors handling TN workers' comp claims. Finally, it summarizes several recent TN appellate court cases related to issues like compensability of parking lot injuries, statute of limitations for hearing loss claims, and the willful misconduct defense.
Alistair Jones Motion for Summary JudgmentAlistair Jones
Ā
Fred Northrop filed a motion for summary judgment against Acme Insurance in a lawsuit alleging sexual discrimination by Northrop's supervisor Helen Redmond. Northrop claims that Redmond offered him a promotion in exchange for sexual favors, and then denied him the promotion and spread false rumors about him after he refused. Northrop argues that as Redmond's actions were in her official capacity as his supervisor for Acme, Acme is liable for sexual discrimination. Northrop is seeking damages, back pay, reinstatement to the denied position, and attorney's fees if found to have experienced discrimination as a motivating factor in being denied the promotion.
Medical EthicsUtilitarianismConcluding Kantās Th.docxARIV4
Ā
Medical Ethics
Utilitarianism
Concluding Kantās Theory
Moral Rights ā
He expresses these as positive and negative rights. Or āfreedom fromā and āfreedom toā
The rights to privacy, to not being killed, to not have our stuff taken from us, etc are all seen as negative rights.
The rights to education, medical care, food, housing and a fair trial are all seen as positive rights.
Kant points out that without both types of rights the categorical imperative would not work. In other words anything that you could will to universal law must not violate either set of rights.
Utilitarianism: Bentham
Bentham points out that two of the governing impulses in human nature are those of pain and pleasure. Within this we have a natural inclination towards pleasure and an avoidance of pain.
Bentham said that the purpose of morality is to maximize human happiness, as measured by pleasure and pain.
This being said Bentham didnāt have a strict structure of right and wrong but only that the right action was dependent upon the yield of greatest net happiness of all the alternatives.
Utility Principle
Idea put forth by John Stuart Mill. Essentially it states that the right act is that which creates the greatest good for the greatest number.
The most basic premise of utilitarianism is that acts are right in proportion to the amount of pleasure they produce while minimizing the amount of pain.
Moral Rights and the Harm Principle
Mill held that individual freedom be it of thought, speech, taste, action and political assembly was of the highest importance.
Individual freedom could only be curtailed by the harm principle.
āā¦the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others.ā (45)
To prevent harm to others individual freedoms can be limited.
Bentham in Bhutan
In the 1970ās the King of Bhutan decided that the Gross National Product (GNP) wasnāt the best way to determine the economic health of his country. He decided that using a system to determine the GNH (Gross National Happiness) was a more appropriate measure for the health of his nation. After developing a complex way of measuring a number of factors it was put into place. With updates done every couple of years.
Social interests
Utilitarianism is much different from egoism in that it wants to put the focus on maximum collective pleasure and minimum collective pain. In this they mean that all persons impacted by a decision or action must be taken into account to determine the correct action.
Preference Satisfaction
Not all pleasures are equal and often times it is said that not all potential pleasures need be judge on the same scale. It is pointed out that often times it is whether the greater problem is not fulfilling ones preferences because we no longer have that option.
And as Peter Singer points out we are not all equal actors either with regard to potential pleasures or ...
Harry W.R. Chamberlain II is an experienced litigator and appellate attorney based in Los Angeles. He has represented major companies, public entities, and professionals in complex litigation for 35 years. Chamberlain is certified as an appellate specialist and has argued hundreds of appeals. He serves on the Board of Trustees of the Los Angeles County Bar Association and is frequently engaged as an expert witness on legal issues. In addition to his litigation practice, Chamberlain lectures and writes extensively on topics related to appellate law, professional liability, and alternative dispute resolution.
2013 Best Best & Krieger Labor & Employment Update: Wage & Hour Case StudiesBest Best and Krieger LLP
Ā
This document summarizes three key labor and employment law cases from 2013:
1) Brinker v. Superior Court clarified that employers must provide meal periods but are not required to ensure employees do not work during these periods. Employers must also provide specified rest periods.
2) Hernandez v. Chipotle Mexican Grill reaffirmed the holding in Brinker that employers are obligated to provide, not police, meal breaks.
3) Kirby v. Immoos Fire Protection ruled that attorneys' fees cannot be awarded for claims involving alleged rest or meal period violations.
Similar to California Employment Law Notes January 2010 (20)
Presentation by Herman Kienhuis (Curiosity VC) on Investing in AI for ABS Alu...Herman Kienhuis
Ā
Presentation by Herman Kienhuis (Curiosity VC) on developments in AI, the venture capital investment landscape and Curiosity VC's approach to investing, at the alumni event of Amsterdam Business School (University of Amsterdam) on June 13, 2024 in Amsterdam.
Discover innovative uses of Revit in urban planning and design, enhancing city landscapes with advanced architectural solutions. Understand how architectural firms are using Revit to transform how processes and outcomes within urban planning and design fields look. They are supplementing work and putting in value through speed and imagination that the architects and planners are placing into composing progressive urban areas that are not only colorful but also pragmatic.
4 Benefits of Partnering with an OnlyFans Agency for Content Creators.pdfonlyfansmanagedau
Ā
In the competitive world of content creation, standing out and maximising revenue on platforms like OnlyFans can be challenging. This is where partnering with an OnlyFans agency can make a significant difference. Here are five key benefits for content creators considering this option:
HR search is critical to a company's success because it ensuresĀ the correct people are in place. HR search integrates workforce capabilities with company goals by painstakingly identifying, screening, and employing qualified candidates, supporting innovation, productivity, and growth. Efficient talent acquisition improves teamwork while encouragingĀ collaboration. Also, it reduces turnover, saves money, and ensures consistency. Furthermore, HR search discovers and develops leadership potential, resulting in a strong pipeline of future leaders. Finally, this strategic approach to recruitment enables businesses to respond to market changes, beat competitors, and achieve long-term success.
šš§šÆšš¢š„ šš”š š š®šš®š«š šØš šš§šš«š š² šššš¢šš¢šš§šš² š°š¢šš” ššššššššāš¬ ššššš¬š ššššš«š¢š§š š¬
Explore the details in our newly released product manual, which showcases NEWNTIDE's advanced heat pump technologies. Delve into our energy-efficient and eco-friendly solutions tailored for diverse global markets.
Satta Matka Kalyan Main Mumbai Fastest Results
Satta Matka ā Sattamatka ā New Mumbai Ratan Satta Matka ā Fast Matka ā Milan Market ā Kalyan Matka Results ā Satta Game ā Matka Game ā Satta Matka ā Kalyan Satta Matka ā Mumbai Main ā Online Matka Results ā Satta Matka Tips ā Milan Chart ā Satta Matka Bossā New Star Day ā Satta King ā Live Satta Matka Results ā Satta Matka Company ā Indian Matka ā Satta Matka 143ā Kalyan Night Matka..
The APCO Geopolitical Radar - Q3 2024 The Global Operating Environment for Bu...APCO
Ā
The Radar reflects input from APCOās teams located around the world. It distils a host of interconnected events and trends into insights to inform operational and strategic decisions. Issues covered in this edition include:
Starting a business is like embarking on an unpredictable adventure. Itās a journey filled with highs and lows, victories and defeats. But what if I told you that those setbacks and failures could be the very stepping stones that lead you to fortune? Letās explore how resilience, adaptability, and strategic thinking can transform adversity into opportunity.
Garments ERP Software in Bangladesh _ Pridesys IT Ltd.pdfPridesys IT Ltd.
Ā
Pridesys Garments ERP is one of the leading ERP solution provider, especially for Garments industries which is integrated with
different modules that cover all the aspects of your Garments Business. This solution supports multi-currency and multi-location
based operations. It aims at keeping track of all the activities including receiving an order from buyer, costing of order, resource
planning, procurement of raw materials, production management, inventory management, import-export process, order
reconciliation process etc. Itās also integrated with other modules of Pridesys ERP including finance, accounts, HR, supply-chain etc.
With this automated solution you can easily track your business activities and entire operations of your garments manufacturing
proces
SATTA MATKA SATTA FAST RESULT KALYAN TOP MATKA RESULT KALYAN SATTA MATKA FAST RESULT MILAN RATAN RAJDHANI MAIN BAZAR MATKA FAST TIPS RESULT MATKA CHART JODI CHART PANEL CHART FREE FIX GAME SATTAMATKA ! MATKA MOBI SATTA 143 spboss.in TOP NO1 RESULT FULL RATE MATKA ONLINE GAME PLAY BY APP SPBOSS
Profiles of Iconic Fashion Personalities.pdfTTop Threads
Ā
The fashion industry is dynamic and ever-changing, continuously sculpted by trailblazing visionaries who challenge norms and redefine beauty. This document delves into the profiles of some of the most iconic fashion personalities whose impact has left a lasting impression on the industry. From timeless designers to modern-day influencers, each individual has uniquely woven their thread into the rich fabric of fashion history, contributing to its ongoing evolution.
Storytelling is an incredibly valuable tool to share data and information. To get the most impact from stories there are a number of key ingredients. These are based on science and human nature. Using these elements in a story you can deliver information impactfully, ensure action and drive change.
Best practices for project execution and deliveryCLIVE MINCHIN
Ā
A select set of project management best practices to keep your project on-track, on-cost and aligned to scope. Many firms have don't have the necessary skills, diligence, methods and oversight of their projects; this leads to slippage, higher costs and longer timeframes. Often firms have a history of projects that simply failed to move the needle. These best practices will help your firm avoid these pitfalls but they require fortitude to apply.
How are Lilac French Bulldogs Beauty Charming the World and Capturing Hearts....Lacey Max
Ā
āAfter being the most listed dog breed in the United States for 31
years in a row, the Labrador Retriever has dropped to second place
in the American Kennel Club's annual survey of the country's most
popular canines. The French Bulldog is the new top dog in the
United States as of 2022. The stylish puppy has ascended the
rankings in rapid time despite having health concerns and limited
color choices.ā
Best Competitive Marble Pricing in Dubai - ā 9928909666Stone Art Hub
Ā
Stone Art Hub offers the best competitive Marble Pricing in Dubai, ensuring affordability without compromising quality. With a wide range of exquisite marble options to choose from, you can enhance your spaces with elegance and sophistication. For inquiries or orders, contact us at ā 9928909666. Experience luxury at unbeatable prices.