SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 13
Harison Xavier
Corporate BBA + MBA 2018
Burwell Vs Hobby Lobby
Introduction
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby is a landmark decision in
United States corporate law by the United States
Supreme Court allowing closely held for-profit
corporations to be exempt from a regulation its owners
religiously object to, according to the provisions of the
Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA).
It is the first time that the court has recognized a for-
profit corporation's claim of religious belief, but it is
limited to closely held corporations.
Plaintiff
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., formerly called Hobby Lobby Creative Centers, is a
private for-profit corporation which owns a chain of American arts and crafts stores
that are managed by corporate employees.
It is founded by self-made billionaire David Green and owned by the Evangelical
Christian Green family with about 21,000 employees.
It provided health insurance covering the contraceptives Plan-B and Ella until it
dropped its coverage in 2012, the year it filed its lawsuit.
Respondent (Petitioner)
The case was previously titled Sebelius v.
Hobby Lobby.
Sylvia Mathews Burwell
Sylvia Burwell was substituted as petitioner
when she was approved by the United States
Senate as the Secretary of Health and Human
Services after being nominated by President
Barack Obama.
❖ The plaintiffs believed that life began at conception which they equated to
fertilization.
❖ Objected to their businesses providing health insurance coverage to their
female employees of four FDA-approved contraceptives that the plaintiffs
believed prevented implantation of a fertilized egg.
The plaintiffs believed these forms of contraception constituted an
abortion/murder.
❖ Emergency contraceptive pills
❖ Intrauterine devices (IUDs)
The Case
❖ Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Obamacare)
The law provides numerous rights and protections that make health coverage
more fair and easy to understand, along with subsidies to make it more
affordable.
The law also expands the Medicaid program to cover more people with low
incomes.
❖ Religious Freedom Restoration Act
Prohibits any agency, department, or official of the United States or any State
(the government) from substantially burdening a person's exercise of religion
even if the burden results from a rule of general applicability.
Laws Applied
❖ First Amendment to the United States Constitution
Prevents the government from making laws which regulate an establishment of
religion, prohibit the free exercise of religion, or abridge the freedom of speech,
the freedom of the press, the right to peaceably assemble, or the right to petition
the government for redress of grievances.
❖ In September 2012, Hobby Lobby filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court against
enforcement of the contraception rule based on the RFRA and the Free Exercise Clause of the
First Amendment.
❖ On November 19, 2012, U.S. District Judge denied Hobby Lobby's request for a preliminary
injunction.
❖ In March 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit granted a hearing of the
case.
❖ In June, the appeals court ruled that Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. is a person who has religious
freedom.
❖ The court ordered the government to stop enforcement of the contraception rule on Hobby Lobby
and sent the case back to the district court, which granted preliminary injunction in July.
❖ In September, the government appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Lower Court History
For closely held for-profit organisations, the Court's majority directly struck down
the contraceptive mandate, a regulation adopted by the US Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS) under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) requiring
employers to cover certain contraceptives for their female employees, by a 5–4
vote.
The ruling is considered to be part of the political controversy regarding the
Affordable Care Act and freedoms in the United States.
U.S. Supreme Court
Conclusion
The court ruled in favour of Hobby Lobby Inc.
As applied to closely held for-profit corporations, the Health and Human
Services (HHS) regulations imposing the contraceptive mandate violate the
Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA).
HHS's contraceptive mandate substantially burdens the exercise of religion
under the RFRA.
The Court assumes that guaranteeing cost-free access to the four challenged
contraceptive methods is a compelling governmental interest, but the Government
has failed to show that the mandate is the least restrictive means of furthering that
interest.
Burwell vs hobby lobby
Burwell vs hobby lobby

More Related Content

Similar to Burwell vs hobby lobby

Current legal challenges facing healthcare
Current legal challenges facing healthcareCurrent legal challenges facing healthcare
Current legal challenges facing healthcarewstarc5
 
SWK 597 Week 2. administrative protections (2)
SWK 597 Week 2. administrative protections (2)SWK 597 Week 2. administrative protections (2)
SWK 597 Week 2. administrative protections (2)TAMUCSocialWork
 
Bleckley Hobby Lobby Memo Final
Bleckley Hobby Lobby Memo FinalBleckley Hobby Lobby Memo Final
Bleckley Hobby Lobby Memo FinalBrett Adams
 
Top 10 Reasons to Save the Court this November
Top 10 Reasons to Save the Court this NovemberTop 10 Reasons to Save the Court this November
Top 10 Reasons to Save the Court this Novemberlsahramaa
 
Rodriguez 1Diego RodriguezWinston PadgettGovernment 2.docx
 Rodriguez 1Diego RodriguezWinston PadgettGovernment 2.docx Rodriguez 1Diego RodriguezWinston PadgettGovernment 2.docx
Rodriguez 1Diego RodriguezWinston PadgettGovernment 2.docxMARRY7
 
Health Law Roe v Wade Analysis of Abortion and Reproductive Rights
Health Law Roe v Wade Analysis of Abortion and Reproductive RightsHealth Law Roe v Wade Analysis of Abortion and Reproductive Rights
Health Law Roe v Wade Analysis of Abortion and Reproductive RightsRichikDadhich
 
Breastfeeding rights in the united states
Breastfeeding rights in the united statesBreastfeeding rights in the united states
Breastfeeding rights in the united statesMarcus Vannini
 
The Ministerial Exception (vs. Prohibition of Race Discrimination)
The Ministerial Exception (vs. Prohibition of Race Discrimination)The Ministerial Exception (vs. Prohibition of Race Discrimination)
The Ministerial Exception (vs. Prohibition of Race Discrimination)Adela Perez del Viso
 
Crossing Obamacare
Crossing ObamacareCrossing Obamacare
Crossing ObamacarePeter Wright
 
Civil rights 04.04 assessment
Civil rights 04.04 assessmentCivil rights 04.04 assessment
Civil rights 04.04 assessmentPatrick Dampare
 
Civil rights 04.04 assessment
Civil rights 04.04 assessmentCivil rights 04.04 assessment
Civil rights 04.04 assessmentamandarosenthal
 
Lesson 4 Mental Health Policy and the Law ReadingsNOTE All.docx
Lesson 4 Mental Health Policy and the Law ReadingsNOTE All.docxLesson 4 Mental Health Policy and the Law ReadingsNOTE All.docx
Lesson 4 Mental Health Policy and the Law ReadingsNOTE All.docxSHIVA101531
 
8.advert.2020.online
8.advert.2020.online8.advert.2020.online
8.advert.2020.onlineBill Kovarik
 
Leg 500 week 11 final exam
Leg 500 week 11 final examLeg 500 week 11 final exam
Leg 500 week 11 final examlaynepettus
 

Similar to Burwell vs hobby lobby (20)

Current legal challenges facing healthcare
Current legal challenges facing healthcareCurrent legal challenges facing healthcare
Current legal challenges facing healthcare
 
AmicusBrief
AmicusBriefAmicusBrief
AmicusBrief
 
SWK 597 Week 2. administrative protections (2)
SWK 597 Week 2. administrative protections (2)SWK 597 Week 2. administrative protections (2)
SWK 597 Week 2. administrative protections (2)
 
Bleckley Hobby Lobby Memo Final
Bleckley Hobby Lobby Memo FinalBleckley Hobby Lobby Memo Final
Bleckley Hobby Lobby Memo Final
 
Top 10 Reasons to Save the Court this November
Top 10 Reasons to Save the Court this NovemberTop 10 Reasons to Save the Court this November
Top 10 Reasons to Save the Court this November
 
Rodriguez 1Diego RodriguezWinston PadgettGovernment 2.docx
 Rodriguez 1Diego RodriguezWinston PadgettGovernment 2.docx Rodriguez 1Diego RodriguezWinston PadgettGovernment 2.docx
Rodriguez 1Diego RodriguezWinston PadgettGovernment 2.docx
 
Health Law Roe v Wade Analysis of Abortion and Reproductive Rights
Health Law Roe v Wade Analysis of Abortion and Reproductive RightsHealth Law Roe v Wade Analysis of Abortion and Reproductive Rights
Health Law Roe v Wade Analysis of Abortion and Reproductive Rights
 
Family Law Issues
Family Law IssuesFamily Law Issues
Family Law Issues
 
Breastfeeding rights in the united states
Breastfeeding rights in the united statesBreastfeeding rights in the united states
Breastfeeding rights in the united states
 
Religious Privileges in America
Religious Privileges in AmericaReligious Privileges in America
Religious Privileges in America
 
The Ministerial Exception (vs. Prohibition of Race Discrimination)
The Ministerial Exception (vs. Prohibition of Race Discrimination)The Ministerial Exception (vs. Prohibition of Race Discrimination)
The Ministerial Exception (vs. Prohibition of Race Discrimination)
 
Crossing Obamacare
Crossing ObamacareCrossing Obamacare
Crossing Obamacare
 
Civil rights 04.04 assessment
Civil rights 04.04 assessmentCivil rights 04.04 assessment
Civil rights 04.04 assessment
 
Civil rights 04.04 assessment
Civil rights 04.04 assessmentCivil rights 04.04 assessment
Civil rights 04.04 assessment
 
What%20 Are%20our%20rights
What%20 Are%20our%20rightsWhat%20 Are%20our%20rights
What%20 Are%20our%20rights
 
Lesson 4 Mental Health Policy and the Law ReadingsNOTE All.docx
Lesson 4 Mental Health Policy and the Law ReadingsNOTE All.docxLesson 4 Mental Health Policy and the Law ReadingsNOTE All.docx
Lesson 4 Mental Health Policy and the Law ReadingsNOTE All.docx
 
Hawaii’s HIPAA Harmonization Law
Hawaii’s HIPAA Harmonization LawHawaii’s HIPAA Harmonization Law
Hawaii’s HIPAA Harmonization Law
 
Court opinion 11 15132
Court opinion 11 15132Court opinion 11 15132
Court opinion 11 15132
 
8.advert.2020.online
8.advert.2020.online8.advert.2020.online
8.advert.2020.online
 
Leg 500 week 11 final exam
Leg 500 week 11 final examLeg 500 week 11 final exam
Leg 500 week 11 final exam
 

More from Harison Xavier

Manufacturing to Smart Manufacturing.
Manufacturing to Smart Manufacturing. Manufacturing to Smart Manufacturing.
Manufacturing to Smart Manufacturing. Harison Xavier
 
How SCM makes a Good Candidate for E commerce Technologies
How SCM makes a Good Candidate for E commerce TechnologiesHow SCM makes a Good Candidate for E commerce Technologies
How SCM makes a Good Candidate for E commerce TechnologiesHarison Xavier
 
Patent Right - Managerial Economics
Patent Right - Managerial EconomicsPatent Right - Managerial Economics
Patent Right - Managerial EconomicsHarison Xavier
 
Valuation of shares under variable growth rates
Valuation of shares under variable growth  rates Valuation of shares under variable growth  rates
Valuation of shares under variable growth rates Harison Xavier
 
Marketing in a developing country
Marketing in a developing country Marketing in a developing country
Marketing in a developing country Harison Xavier
 
Plachimada coca cola case study - Corporate Ethics
Plachimada coca cola case study - Corporate Ethics Plachimada coca cola case study - Corporate Ethics
Plachimada coca cola case study - Corporate Ethics Harison Xavier
 
Organization climate dimensions - Leadership and Teamwork
Organization climate dimensions - Leadership and TeamworkOrganization climate dimensions - Leadership and Teamwork
Organization climate dimensions - Leadership and TeamworkHarison Xavier
 
Sample login page design
Sample login page designSample login page design
Sample login page designHarison Xavier
 

More from Harison Xavier (8)

Manufacturing to Smart Manufacturing.
Manufacturing to Smart Manufacturing. Manufacturing to Smart Manufacturing.
Manufacturing to Smart Manufacturing.
 
How SCM makes a Good Candidate for E commerce Technologies
How SCM makes a Good Candidate for E commerce TechnologiesHow SCM makes a Good Candidate for E commerce Technologies
How SCM makes a Good Candidate for E commerce Technologies
 
Patent Right - Managerial Economics
Patent Right - Managerial EconomicsPatent Right - Managerial Economics
Patent Right - Managerial Economics
 
Valuation of shares under variable growth rates
Valuation of shares under variable growth  rates Valuation of shares under variable growth  rates
Valuation of shares under variable growth rates
 
Marketing in a developing country
Marketing in a developing country Marketing in a developing country
Marketing in a developing country
 
Plachimada coca cola case study - Corporate Ethics
Plachimada coca cola case study - Corporate Ethics Plachimada coca cola case study - Corporate Ethics
Plachimada coca cola case study - Corporate Ethics
 
Organization climate dimensions - Leadership and Teamwork
Organization climate dimensions - Leadership and TeamworkOrganization climate dimensions - Leadership and Teamwork
Organization climate dimensions - Leadership and Teamwork
 
Sample login page design
Sample login page designSample login page design
Sample login page design
 

Recently uploaded

PowerPoint - Legal Citation Form 1 - Case Law.pptx
PowerPoint - Legal Citation Form 1 - Case Law.pptxPowerPoint - Legal Citation Form 1 - Case Law.pptx
PowerPoint - Legal Citation Form 1 - Case Law.pptxca2or2tx
 
6th sem cpc notes for 6th semester students samjhe. Padhlo bhai
6th sem cpc notes for 6th semester students samjhe. Padhlo bhai6th sem cpc notes for 6th semester students samjhe. Padhlo bhai
6th sem cpc notes for 6th semester students samjhe. Padhlo bhaiShashankKumar441258
 
一比一原版牛津布鲁克斯大学毕业证学位证书
一比一原版牛津布鲁克斯大学毕业证学位证书一比一原版牛津布鲁克斯大学毕业证学位证书
一比一原版牛津布鲁克斯大学毕业证学位证书E LSS
 
The doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statute
The doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statuteThe doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statute
The doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statuteDeepikaK245113
 
LITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULE
LITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULELITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULE
LITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULEsreeramsaipranitha
 
PPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptx
PPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptxPPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptx
PPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptxRRR Chambers
 
Audience profile - SF.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Audience profile - SF.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxAudience profile - SF.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Audience profile - SF.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxMollyBrown86
 
CALL ON ➥8923113531 🔝Call Girls Singar Nagar Lucknow best sexual service
CALL ON ➥8923113531 🔝Call Girls Singar Nagar Lucknow best sexual serviceCALL ON ➥8923113531 🔝Call Girls Singar Nagar Lucknow best sexual service
CALL ON ➥8923113531 🔝Call Girls Singar Nagar Lucknow best sexual serviceanilsa9823
 
8. SECURITY GUARD CREED, CODE OF CONDUCT, COPE.pptx
8. SECURITY GUARD CREED, CODE OF CONDUCT, COPE.pptx8. SECURITY GUARD CREED, CODE OF CONDUCT, COPE.pptx
8. SECURITY GUARD CREED, CODE OF CONDUCT, COPE.pptxPamelaAbegailMonsant2
 
Andrea Hill Featured in Canadian Lawyer as SkyLaw Recognized as a Top Boutique
Andrea Hill Featured in Canadian Lawyer as SkyLaw Recognized as a Top BoutiqueAndrea Hill Featured in Canadian Lawyer as SkyLaw Recognized as a Top Boutique
Andrea Hill Featured in Canadian Lawyer as SkyLaw Recognized as a Top BoutiqueSkyLaw Professional Corporation
 
COPYRIGHTS - PPT 01.12.2023 part- 2.pptx
COPYRIGHTS - PPT 01.12.2023 part- 2.pptxCOPYRIGHTS - PPT 01.12.2023 part- 2.pptx
COPYRIGHTS - PPT 01.12.2023 part- 2.pptxRRR Chambers
 
INVOLUNTARY TRANSFERS Kenya school of law.pptx
INVOLUNTARY TRANSFERS Kenya school of law.pptxINVOLUNTARY TRANSFERS Kenya school of law.pptx
INVOLUNTARY TRANSFERS Kenya school of law.pptxnyabatejosphat1
 
一比一原版利兹大学毕业证学位证书
一比一原版利兹大学毕业证学位证书一比一原版利兹大学毕业证学位证书
一比一原版利兹大学毕业证学位证书E LSS
 
一比一原版旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书
 一比一原版旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书 一比一原版旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书
一比一原版旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书SS A
 
Appeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdf
Appeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdfAppeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdf
Appeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdfPoojaGadiya1
 
Negotiable Instruments Act 1881.UNDERSTAND THE LAW OF 1881
Negotiable Instruments Act 1881.UNDERSTAND THE LAW OF 1881Negotiable Instruments Act 1881.UNDERSTAND THE LAW OF 1881
Negotiable Instruments Act 1881.UNDERSTAND THE LAW OF 1881mayurchatre90
 
Relationship Between International Law and Municipal Law MIR.pdf
Relationship Between International Law and Municipal Law MIR.pdfRelationship Between International Law and Municipal Law MIR.pdf
Relationship Between International Law and Municipal Law MIR.pdfKelechi48
 

Recently uploaded (20)

PowerPoint - Legal Citation Form 1 - Case Law.pptx
PowerPoint - Legal Citation Form 1 - Case Law.pptxPowerPoint - Legal Citation Form 1 - Case Law.pptx
PowerPoint - Legal Citation Form 1 - Case Law.pptx
 
6th sem cpc notes for 6th semester students samjhe. Padhlo bhai
6th sem cpc notes for 6th semester students samjhe. Padhlo bhai6th sem cpc notes for 6th semester students samjhe. Padhlo bhai
6th sem cpc notes for 6th semester students samjhe. Padhlo bhai
 
一比一原版牛津布鲁克斯大学毕业证学位证书
一比一原版牛津布鲁克斯大学毕业证学位证书一比一原版牛津布鲁克斯大学毕业证学位证书
一比一原版牛津布鲁克斯大学毕业证学位证书
 
The doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statute
The doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statuteThe doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statute
The doctrine of harmonious construction under Interpretation of statute
 
LITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULE
LITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULELITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULE
LITERAL RULE OF INTERPRETATION - PRIMARY RULE
 
PPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptx
PPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptxPPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptx
PPT- Voluntary Liquidation (Under section 59).pptx
 
Russian Call Girls Rohini Sector 7 💓 Delhi 9999965857 @Sabina Modi VVIP MODEL...
Russian Call Girls Rohini Sector 7 💓 Delhi 9999965857 @Sabina Modi VVIP MODEL...Russian Call Girls Rohini Sector 7 💓 Delhi 9999965857 @Sabina Modi VVIP MODEL...
Russian Call Girls Rohini Sector 7 💓 Delhi 9999965857 @Sabina Modi VVIP MODEL...
 
Russian Call Girls Rohini Sector 6 💓 Delhi 9999965857 @Sabina Modi VVIP MODEL...
Russian Call Girls Rohini Sector 6 💓 Delhi 9999965857 @Sabina Modi VVIP MODEL...Russian Call Girls Rohini Sector 6 💓 Delhi 9999965857 @Sabina Modi VVIP MODEL...
Russian Call Girls Rohini Sector 6 💓 Delhi 9999965857 @Sabina Modi VVIP MODEL...
 
Audience profile - SF.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Audience profile - SF.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxAudience profile - SF.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Audience profile - SF.pptxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 
CALL ON ➥8923113531 🔝Call Girls Singar Nagar Lucknow best sexual service
CALL ON ➥8923113531 🔝Call Girls Singar Nagar Lucknow best sexual serviceCALL ON ➥8923113531 🔝Call Girls Singar Nagar Lucknow best sexual service
CALL ON ➥8923113531 🔝Call Girls Singar Nagar Lucknow best sexual service
 
8. SECURITY GUARD CREED, CODE OF CONDUCT, COPE.pptx
8. SECURITY GUARD CREED, CODE OF CONDUCT, COPE.pptx8. SECURITY GUARD CREED, CODE OF CONDUCT, COPE.pptx
8. SECURITY GUARD CREED, CODE OF CONDUCT, COPE.pptx
 
Andrea Hill Featured in Canadian Lawyer as SkyLaw Recognized as a Top Boutique
Andrea Hill Featured in Canadian Lawyer as SkyLaw Recognized as a Top BoutiqueAndrea Hill Featured in Canadian Lawyer as SkyLaw Recognized as a Top Boutique
Andrea Hill Featured in Canadian Lawyer as SkyLaw Recognized as a Top Boutique
 
COPYRIGHTS - PPT 01.12.2023 part- 2.pptx
COPYRIGHTS - PPT 01.12.2023 part- 2.pptxCOPYRIGHTS - PPT 01.12.2023 part- 2.pptx
COPYRIGHTS - PPT 01.12.2023 part- 2.pptx
 
INVOLUNTARY TRANSFERS Kenya school of law.pptx
INVOLUNTARY TRANSFERS Kenya school of law.pptxINVOLUNTARY TRANSFERS Kenya school of law.pptx
INVOLUNTARY TRANSFERS Kenya school of law.pptx
 
一比一原版利兹大学毕业证学位证书
一比一原版利兹大学毕业证学位证书一比一原版利兹大学毕业证学位证书
一比一原版利兹大学毕业证学位证书
 
一比一原版旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书
 一比一原版旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书 一比一原版旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书
一比一原版旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书
 
Appeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdf
Appeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdfAppeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdf
Appeal and Revision in Income Tax Act.pdf
 
Negotiable Instruments Act 1881.UNDERSTAND THE LAW OF 1881
Negotiable Instruments Act 1881.UNDERSTAND THE LAW OF 1881Negotiable Instruments Act 1881.UNDERSTAND THE LAW OF 1881
Negotiable Instruments Act 1881.UNDERSTAND THE LAW OF 1881
 
Sensual Moments: +91 9999965857 Independent Call Girls Vasundhara Delhi {{ Mo...
Sensual Moments: +91 9999965857 Independent Call Girls Vasundhara Delhi {{ Mo...Sensual Moments: +91 9999965857 Independent Call Girls Vasundhara Delhi {{ Mo...
Sensual Moments: +91 9999965857 Independent Call Girls Vasundhara Delhi {{ Mo...
 
Relationship Between International Law and Municipal Law MIR.pdf
Relationship Between International Law and Municipal Law MIR.pdfRelationship Between International Law and Municipal Law MIR.pdf
Relationship Between International Law and Municipal Law MIR.pdf
 

Burwell vs hobby lobby

  • 3. Introduction Burwell v. Hobby Lobby is a landmark decision in United States corporate law by the United States Supreme Court allowing closely held for-profit corporations to be exempt from a regulation its owners religiously object to, according to the provisions of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA). It is the first time that the court has recognized a for- profit corporation's claim of religious belief, but it is limited to closely held corporations.
  • 4. Plaintiff Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., formerly called Hobby Lobby Creative Centers, is a private for-profit corporation which owns a chain of American arts and crafts stores that are managed by corporate employees. It is founded by self-made billionaire David Green and owned by the Evangelical Christian Green family with about 21,000 employees. It provided health insurance covering the contraceptives Plan-B and Ella until it dropped its coverage in 2012, the year it filed its lawsuit.
  • 5. Respondent (Petitioner) The case was previously titled Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby. Sylvia Mathews Burwell Sylvia Burwell was substituted as petitioner when she was approved by the United States Senate as the Secretary of Health and Human Services after being nominated by President Barack Obama.
  • 6. ❖ The plaintiffs believed that life began at conception which they equated to fertilization. ❖ Objected to their businesses providing health insurance coverage to their female employees of four FDA-approved contraceptives that the plaintiffs believed prevented implantation of a fertilized egg. The plaintiffs believed these forms of contraception constituted an abortion/murder. ❖ Emergency contraceptive pills ❖ Intrauterine devices (IUDs) The Case
  • 7. ❖ Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) The law provides numerous rights and protections that make health coverage more fair and easy to understand, along with subsidies to make it more affordable. The law also expands the Medicaid program to cover more people with low incomes. ❖ Religious Freedom Restoration Act Prohibits any agency, department, or official of the United States or any State (the government) from substantially burdening a person's exercise of religion even if the burden results from a rule of general applicability. Laws Applied
  • 8. ❖ First Amendment to the United States Constitution Prevents the government from making laws which regulate an establishment of religion, prohibit the free exercise of religion, or abridge the freedom of speech, the freedom of the press, the right to peaceably assemble, or the right to petition the government for redress of grievances.
  • 9. ❖ In September 2012, Hobby Lobby filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court against enforcement of the contraception rule based on the RFRA and the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment. ❖ On November 19, 2012, U.S. District Judge denied Hobby Lobby's request for a preliminary injunction. ❖ In March 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit granted a hearing of the case. ❖ In June, the appeals court ruled that Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. is a person who has religious freedom. ❖ The court ordered the government to stop enforcement of the contraception rule on Hobby Lobby and sent the case back to the district court, which granted preliminary injunction in July. ❖ In September, the government appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. Lower Court History
  • 10. For closely held for-profit organisations, the Court's majority directly struck down the contraceptive mandate, a regulation adopted by the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) requiring employers to cover certain contraceptives for their female employees, by a 5–4 vote. The ruling is considered to be part of the political controversy regarding the Affordable Care Act and freedoms in the United States. U.S. Supreme Court
  • 11. Conclusion The court ruled in favour of Hobby Lobby Inc. As applied to closely held for-profit corporations, the Health and Human Services (HHS) regulations imposing the contraceptive mandate violate the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA). HHS's contraceptive mandate substantially burdens the exercise of religion under the RFRA. The Court assumes that guaranteeing cost-free access to the four challenged contraceptive methods is a compelling governmental interest, but the Government has failed to show that the mandate is the least restrictive means of furthering that interest.