This brief covers the Government Procurement within the CARIFORUM-EC Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA), which was concluded on December 16, 2007, and signed in October 15, 2008.
Contract law in Poland is regulated by the Polish Civil Code, which is based on continental European legal models like the Napoleonic Code. The Civil Code was adopted in 1964 and underwent significant changes in 2003 regarding definitions of terms like "consumer" and "entrepreneur", and new regulations for business names, commercial representation, and contract conclusion. A new version of the Civil Code is currently being drafted to harmonize it with the Polish Constitution, EU law, and international trade practices. Consumer protection law was also passed in 2014 to align Polish law with EU consumer regulations. Additionally, regulations like Rome I and Rome II determine the governing law for international contracts and non-contractual obligations in Poland.
Baker & McKenzie Doing Business in Poland - Chapter 11 (Intellectual Property...Baker & McKenzie Poland
This document summarizes intellectual property law in Poland. It discusses that Polish IP law is governed by the Industrial Property Law and the Act on Copyright and Related Rights. It protects inventions, utility models, industrial designs, trademarks, geographical indications, and integrated circuits. The document provides details on patents, utility models, industrial designs, and trademarks - the requirements, rights conferred, application process and duration of protection for each. It also mentions that some IP rights can be protected at the EU level through the European Union Intellectual Property Office in Spain.
Baker & McKenzie's Doing Business in Poland - Chapter 7 (Property Law)Baker & McKenzie Poland
This document summarizes Polish property law and real estate transactions. It discusses various types of property titles including ownership, perpetual usufruct, limited property rights, and rights arising from obligations. It also describes key concepts like leaseholds, tenancies, registration of property titles, rights of first refusal, and restrictions on foreign purchases of real estate, especially agricultural land.
SDVOSB LATVIAN CONNECTION LLC STATEMENTKeven Barnes
SDVOSB Latvian Connection LLC has filed several successful GAO protests against various government agencies for violations of federal procurement laws and regulations regarding small business set-asides. These protests resulted in legal opinions from the SBA supporting Latvian's position. However, Latvian has faced retaliation from FedBid and defacto debarment from various agencies such as the DoD and DoS that have prevented it from competing for contracts. The SBA has weighed in on several cases arguing that Latvian should have been allowed to bid and issues referred to the SBA for a Certificate of Competency.
The document provides information about various documents required for international trade:
1. A Certificate of Origin certifies the country of origin of shipped goods and is important for customs regulations and import quotas.
2. A Commercial Invoice/Packing List provides details of shipped goods such as descriptions, quantities, values, and weights.
3. A Fumigation Certificate certifies that goods have been properly fumigated to meet phytosanitary requirements of the importing country.
4. An Export Invoice provides commercial and shipping details of a transaction including product descriptions, values, consignee information, and certification that dangerous goods are properly declared.
The document discusses key changes and updates made in Incoterms® 2010, which are a set of international rules for interpreting commonly used trade terms. Some notable changes include reducing the number of rules from 13 to 11, classifying the rules based on mode of transport rather than letters, recognizing electronic communication, clarifying insurance and security obligations, and addressing issues like multiple terminal handling charges. When using the updated Incoterms® 2010, parties must carefully read the rules and specify places as precisely as possible to accurately allocate duties and avoid unexpected obligations.
The Board of Directors (BD) of the Competition Superintendence (CS) imposed fines to the telephone companies TELEMOVIL, TELEFONICA, DIGICEL, and INTELFON totaling US$1,215,497.94 for fixing the tariff of US$0.21 per minute plus VAT for every call originating in land telephony network and terminating in their mobile networks.
The document discusses several Acer smartphone models including the F1, E200, E101, and C1/E1. It provides technical specifications and positioning for each model. The F1 is a high-end Windows smartphone, the E200 offers touch and keyboard, the E101 targets price-conscious users, and the C1/E1 emphasizes messaging, social connectivity and ease of use.
Contract law in Poland is regulated by the Polish Civil Code, which is based on continental European legal models like the Napoleonic Code. The Civil Code was adopted in 1964 and underwent significant changes in 2003 regarding definitions of terms like "consumer" and "entrepreneur", and new regulations for business names, commercial representation, and contract conclusion. A new version of the Civil Code is currently being drafted to harmonize it with the Polish Constitution, EU law, and international trade practices. Consumer protection law was also passed in 2014 to align Polish law with EU consumer regulations. Additionally, regulations like Rome I and Rome II determine the governing law for international contracts and non-contractual obligations in Poland.
Baker & McKenzie Doing Business in Poland - Chapter 11 (Intellectual Property...Baker & McKenzie Poland
This document summarizes intellectual property law in Poland. It discusses that Polish IP law is governed by the Industrial Property Law and the Act on Copyright and Related Rights. It protects inventions, utility models, industrial designs, trademarks, geographical indications, and integrated circuits. The document provides details on patents, utility models, industrial designs, and trademarks - the requirements, rights conferred, application process and duration of protection for each. It also mentions that some IP rights can be protected at the EU level through the European Union Intellectual Property Office in Spain.
Baker & McKenzie's Doing Business in Poland - Chapter 7 (Property Law)Baker & McKenzie Poland
This document summarizes Polish property law and real estate transactions. It discusses various types of property titles including ownership, perpetual usufruct, limited property rights, and rights arising from obligations. It also describes key concepts like leaseholds, tenancies, registration of property titles, rights of first refusal, and restrictions on foreign purchases of real estate, especially agricultural land.
SDVOSB LATVIAN CONNECTION LLC STATEMENTKeven Barnes
SDVOSB Latvian Connection LLC has filed several successful GAO protests against various government agencies for violations of federal procurement laws and regulations regarding small business set-asides. These protests resulted in legal opinions from the SBA supporting Latvian's position. However, Latvian has faced retaliation from FedBid and defacto debarment from various agencies such as the DoD and DoS that have prevented it from competing for contracts. The SBA has weighed in on several cases arguing that Latvian should have been allowed to bid and issues referred to the SBA for a Certificate of Competency.
The document provides information about various documents required for international trade:
1. A Certificate of Origin certifies the country of origin of shipped goods and is important for customs regulations and import quotas.
2. A Commercial Invoice/Packing List provides details of shipped goods such as descriptions, quantities, values, and weights.
3. A Fumigation Certificate certifies that goods have been properly fumigated to meet phytosanitary requirements of the importing country.
4. An Export Invoice provides commercial and shipping details of a transaction including product descriptions, values, consignee information, and certification that dangerous goods are properly declared.
The document discusses key changes and updates made in Incoterms® 2010, which are a set of international rules for interpreting commonly used trade terms. Some notable changes include reducing the number of rules from 13 to 11, classifying the rules based on mode of transport rather than letters, recognizing electronic communication, clarifying insurance and security obligations, and addressing issues like multiple terminal handling charges. When using the updated Incoterms® 2010, parties must carefully read the rules and specify places as precisely as possible to accurately allocate duties and avoid unexpected obligations.
The Board of Directors (BD) of the Competition Superintendence (CS) imposed fines to the telephone companies TELEMOVIL, TELEFONICA, DIGICEL, and INTELFON totaling US$1,215,497.94 for fixing the tariff of US$0.21 per minute plus VAT for every call originating in land telephony network and terminating in their mobile networks.
The document discusses several Acer smartphone models including the F1, E200, E101, and C1/E1. It provides technical specifications and positioning for each model. The F1 is a high-end Windows smartphone, the E200 offers touch and keyboard, the E101 targets price-conscious users, and the C1/E1 emphasizes messaging, social connectivity and ease of use.
This brief covers the Most Favoured Nation (MFN) Clause within the CARIFORUM-EC Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA), which was concluded on December 16, 2007, and signed in October 15, 2008.
This brief covers the issue of Differentiation within the CARIFORUM-EC Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA), which was concluded on December 16, 2007, and signed in October 15, 2008.
This document summarizes a self-assessment report from Korea that was prepared as background for the ADB/OECD Initiative's thematic review of measures to curb corruption in public procurement in Asia and the Pacific. The review was initiated to identify areas requiring reform in public procurement based on a prior analysis. Participating countries provide information by responding to a questionnaire. Korea's responses provide details about its legal and institutional framework for public procurement, policies and practices, and efforts to ensure transparency in procurement opportunities, evaluation and award procedures.
This brief covers the Special and Differential Treatment (SDT) within the CARIFORUM-EC Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA), which was concluded on December 16, 2007, and signed in October 15, 2008.
This brief covers Trade Related issues (TRI) under the CARIFORUM-EC Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA), which was concluded on December 16, 2007, and signed in October 15, 2008.
This thesis examines substantive competition law and jurisdictional issues between EC and UK competition laws. It provides analysis of anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominance, and merger control under both jurisdictions. The analysis indicates similarities but also differences in the objectives and application of competition laws at the EC and national levels in the UK due to disparities in policy goals between supranational and national competition regimes.
JOBS Act Rulemaking Comments on SEC File Number S7-11-13 Dated March 26, 2014...Jason Coombs
This letter addresses proposed rules for Regulation A+ under the JOBS Act. It urges the SEC to adopt the proposed rules with some minor modifications: 1) Add a Tier 2 between proposed Tiers 1 and 2, with lesser financial statement and capital raising requirements than Tier 2. 2) Require different levels of auditing for each tier, including "self-auditing" for Tier 1. 3) Provide preemption from state registration for national issuers in all tiers, but allow states to regulate local issuers in Tier 1. It also requests clarification on the use of brokers and investor qualification requirements.
This document summarizes the key points of a resolution regulating accounting separation, regulatory accounting, and reporting requirements for telecommunications companies in Oman. It was issued by the Telecommunications Regulatory Authority (TRA) and establishes rules for separated regulatory accounts, cost allocation, transfer charges, documentation requirements, audit procedures, and timeframes for submissions. Notified operators, or those without effective competition, must prepare separated accounts for different markets and services according to accounting separation, cost allocation, and reporting principles outlined in the resolution.
This document outlines the table of contents and preamble for a free trade agreement between Mercosur and Egypt. The agreement establishes a free trade area and aims to gradually eliminate tariffs and non-tariff barriers to trade. It covers trade in goods and services, investment, rules of origin, technical barriers to trade, and includes provisions for safeguards, dispute settlement, and institutions.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS(FAQs) RELATED TO PROCUREMENT Nadeem Khan
The document contains answers to frequently asked questions (FAQs) about public procurement in Pakistan.
1) The minimum response time for procurement advertisements is 15 days for national competitive bidding and 30 days for international competitive bidding, as per Rule 13 of the Public Procurement Rules 2004. Procuring agencies can increase the response time depending on the procurement nature.
2) Response time is calculated from the date of first advertisement publication in a newspaper or on the PPRA website. If advertised in both print and online, the response time is calculated from the newspaper publication date.
3) Procuring agencies may require up to 5% bid security of the bid price as per Rule 25, but cannot fix the
Some Thoughts for CCI-II : Participatory Competition Law Enforcement - K K Sh...KK SHARMA LAW OFFICES
Carrying forward , the theme of an earlier article, the author looks at the authorised representation before the Competition Commission of India (‘Commission’) and whether it continues the way it was envisaged in the Act or tilting in favour of any particular profession. He also examines the newly started practice of the Commission calling the opposite parties during the preliminary hearings with the informant to fully understand thae matter. There were certain amendments introduced to the Competition Act, 2002(‘Act’) in September, 2007. The issue being examined in this article also includes the point if this practice is compatible with the amendments of 2007 to the Act.
The author who not only was closely involved in amendments of 2007, drafting regulations for the functioning of the Commission and headed the Antitrust Division of CCI but was also the first Director General of the functional Commissiondiscusses the compatibility of this new practice with the probability of success of investigation process in this article.
The document provides an overview of the proposed new electricity market arrangements in Ukraine. Key points include:
1. The market will have forward bilateral contracting, a day-ahead market (DAM), and an intra-day market (IDM). In the forward market, participants bilaterally trade physical products.
2. In the DAM, suppliers and producers submit hourly bids and orders for residual volumes not contracted bilaterally. The market operator runs optimization to determine clearing prices.
3. The continuous IDM allows participants to modify positions from bilateral contracts and the DAM. The regulator may impose obligations to ensure adequate DAM liquidity.
4. Renewable and CHP generators will contract with a Guarante
THE STATUS OF THE HAGUE RULES IN NIGERIA VIS-À-VIS THE HAMBURG RULESNnagozie Azih
The document discusses the implications of a Federal High Court of Nigeria decision regarding the statutes of limitations for cargo claims. Specifically:
1. It analyzes whether the Hague Rules from 1924 can still validly apply to carriage of goods into Nigeria given that the Hamburg Rules were domesticated in 2005, arguing that the Hamburg Rules were intended to replace the Hague Rules as the governing law.
2. It examines whether terms in a bill of lading can override the express provisions of an international convention that has been domesticated, as the court found the bill of lading's one-year limitation period applied over the Hamburg Rules' two-year period.
3. It ultimately argues that the Hamburg Rules domestication
Key procurement issues – third party reliance and the ‘Living Wage’ Angela Konteas
Teckal-ing public-public contracts in the PCR 2015 Lynne Rathbone and Vicky Bills
Portsmouth City Council v Ensign – no good faith Anja Beriro and Vicky Bills
Employment update Sarah Hooton
Increase in custodial sentences for fire safety offences Carl May-Smith
Emergency Services Collaboration – a consultation Sarah Hooton
Directors’ duties in the context of local authority companies
Peter Ware
The document summarizes guidance and new regulations implementing the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. It discusses the OMB interim guidance, which emphasizes transparency and accountability in spending the $360 billion in contracts and grants. It also outlines new Federal Acquisition Regulation provisions implementing requirements for publicizing contract actions, reporting on use of funds, whistleblower protections, expanded government oversight access, and Buy American rules for construction materials.
This brief covers Legal and Institutional Issues within the CARIFORUM-EC Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA), which was concluded on December 16, 2007, and signed in October 15, 2008.
The document summarizes key aspects of the legal framework for public procurement in the CARICOM region, including two main legal instruments, objectives of transparency and fairness, and procedures to promote participation of CARICOM suppliers. It outlines the scope of the regime, protected national spaces, and requirements for procuring entities and suppliers to plan for the regional public procurement market. Suppliers are given rights to challenge and appeal procurement decisions through an independent review body to ensure fairness.
A comparative study of the provisions of the Indian Competition Act, US Anti ...Pritam Pandey
This document provides an overview of competition law in India, the United States, and the United Kingdom. It discusses key provisions and comparisons. The main points are:
1) Competition law deals with restrictive business practices and market failures. The US Sherman Act of 1890 was one of the earliest such laws. India, UK, and over 100 other countries now have competition laws.
2) The Indian Competition Act covers anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominant position, and combinations. It established the Competition Commission of India to enforce the act.
3) US and UK competition laws are more rigorously applied and enforced through criminal sanctions. Violations in India are larger in number but attract less regulatory attention.
The Competition Act 2002 provides for prohibition of abuse of dominant position. However, the provisions of unfair trade practices earlier covered by the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969,are not covered under the competition law. The apparent effect of the two being quite similar, there is a considerable possibility that a situation very close to unfair trade practices may be held to be an abuse of dominant position. The difference being very close, the article looks at the penalty handed out to DLF Ltd for abuse of dominant position from this perspective.
This document provides guidance on framework agreements under the 2006 Public Contracts and Utilities Contracts Regulations. It defines a framework agreement as an agreement between contracting authorities and economic operators that establishes terms for entering contracts during the framework period. It discusses setting up framework agreements, including considering early if it is appropriate, advertising in OJEU, and awarding the agreement. It also covers calling off individual contracts under existing frameworks in compliance with EU principles.
The document is the 2014-2015 Global Competitiveness Report published by the World Economic Forum. It was edited by Professor Klaus Schwab and Professor Xavier Sala-i-Martín. The report assesses the competitiveness of various countries and economies based on the Global Competitiveness Index and data from the Executive Opinion Survey. It acknowledges contributions from various partner institutes that provided important support and data.
The 2014 Annual Report is split into three main sections. The first contains a message from the WTO Director-General. The second section provides a brief overview of 2013 and some background information on the WTO, while the third has more in-depth information.
More Related Content
Similar to Brief: Understanding The Nature and Scope Of The Public Procurement Chapter Of The Epa Iu
This brief covers the Most Favoured Nation (MFN) Clause within the CARIFORUM-EC Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA), which was concluded on December 16, 2007, and signed in October 15, 2008.
This brief covers the issue of Differentiation within the CARIFORUM-EC Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA), which was concluded on December 16, 2007, and signed in October 15, 2008.
This document summarizes a self-assessment report from Korea that was prepared as background for the ADB/OECD Initiative's thematic review of measures to curb corruption in public procurement in Asia and the Pacific. The review was initiated to identify areas requiring reform in public procurement based on a prior analysis. Participating countries provide information by responding to a questionnaire. Korea's responses provide details about its legal and institutional framework for public procurement, policies and practices, and efforts to ensure transparency in procurement opportunities, evaluation and award procedures.
This brief covers the Special and Differential Treatment (SDT) within the CARIFORUM-EC Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA), which was concluded on December 16, 2007, and signed in October 15, 2008.
This brief covers Trade Related issues (TRI) under the CARIFORUM-EC Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA), which was concluded on December 16, 2007, and signed in October 15, 2008.
This thesis examines substantive competition law and jurisdictional issues between EC and UK competition laws. It provides analysis of anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominance, and merger control under both jurisdictions. The analysis indicates similarities but also differences in the objectives and application of competition laws at the EC and national levels in the UK due to disparities in policy goals between supranational and national competition regimes.
JOBS Act Rulemaking Comments on SEC File Number S7-11-13 Dated March 26, 2014...Jason Coombs
This letter addresses proposed rules for Regulation A+ under the JOBS Act. It urges the SEC to adopt the proposed rules with some minor modifications: 1) Add a Tier 2 between proposed Tiers 1 and 2, with lesser financial statement and capital raising requirements than Tier 2. 2) Require different levels of auditing for each tier, including "self-auditing" for Tier 1. 3) Provide preemption from state registration for national issuers in all tiers, but allow states to regulate local issuers in Tier 1. It also requests clarification on the use of brokers and investor qualification requirements.
This document summarizes the key points of a resolution regulating accounting separation, regulatory accounting, and reporting requirements for telecommunications companies in Oman. It was issued by the Telecommunications Regulatory Authority (TRA) and establishes rules for separated regulatory accounts, cost allocation, transfer charges, documentation requirements, audit procedures, and timeframes for submissions. Notified operators, or those without effective competition, must prepare separated accounts for different markets and services according to accounting separation, cost allocation, and reporting principles outlined in the resolution.
This document outlines the table of contents and preamble for a free trade agreement between Mercosur and Egypt. The agreement establishes a free trade area and aims to gradually eliminate tariffs and non-tariff barriers to trade. It covers trade in goods and services, investment, rules of origin, technical barriers to trade, and includes provisions for safeguards, dispute settlement, and institutions.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS(FAQs) RELATED TO PROCUREMENT Nadeem Khan
The document contains answers to frequently asked questions (FAQs) about public procurement in Pakistan.
1) The minimum response time for procurement advertisements is 15 days for national competitive bidding and 30 days for international competitive bidding, as per Rule 13 of the Public Procurement Rules 2004. Procuring agencies can increase the response time depending on the procurement nature.
2) Response time is calculated from the date of first advertisement publication in a newspaper or on the PPRA website. If advertised in both print and online, the response time is calculated from the newspaper publication date.
3) Procuring agencies may require up to 5% bid security of the bid price as per Rule 25, but cannot fix the
Some Thoughts for CCI-II : Participatory Competition Law Enforcement - K K Sh...KK SHARMA LAW OFFICES
Carrying forward , the theme of an earlier article, the author looks at the authorised representation before the Competition Commission of India (‘Commission’) and whether it continues the way it was envisaged in the Act or tilting in favour of any particular profession. He also examines the newly started practice of the Commission calling the opposite parties during the preliminary hearings with the informant to fully understand thae matter. There were certain amendments introduced to the Competition Act, 2002(‘Act’) in September, 2007. The issue being examined in this article also includes the point if this practice is compatible with the amendments of 2007 to the Act.
The author who not only was closely involved in amendments of 2007, drafting regulations for the functioning of the Commission and headed the Antitrust Division of CCI but was also the first Director General of the functional Commissiondiscusses the compatibility of this new practice with the probability of success of investigation process in this article.
The document provides an overview of the proposed new electricity market arrangements in Ukraine. Key points include:
1. The market will have forward bilateral contracting, a day-ahead market (DAM), and an intra-day market (IDM). In the forward market, participants bilaterally trade physical products.
2. In the DAM, suppliers and producers submit hourly bids and orders for residual volumes not contracted bilaterally. The market operator runs optimization to determine clearing prices.
3. The continuous IDM allows participants to modify positions from bilateral contracts and the DAM. The regulator may impose obligations to ensure adequate DAM liquidity.
4. Renewable and CHP generators will contract with a Guarante
THE STATUS OF THE HAGUE RULES IN NIGERIA VIS-À-VIS THE HAMBURG RULESNnagozie Azih
The document discusses the implications of a Federal High Court of Nigeria decision regarding the statutes of limitations for cargo claims. Specifically:
1. It analyzes whether the Hague Rules from 1924 can still validly apply to carriage of goods into Nigeria given that the Hamburg Rules were domesticated in 2005, arguing that the Hamburg Rules were intended to replace the Hague Rules as the governing law.
2. It examines whether terms in a bill of lading can override the express provisions of an international convention that has been domesticated, as the court found the bill of lading's one-year limitation period applied over the Hamburg Rules' two-year period.
3. It ultimately argues that the Hamburg Rules domestication
Key procurement issues – third party reliance and the ‘Living Wage’ Angela Konteas
Teckal-ing public-public contracts in the PCR 2015 Lynne Rathbone and Vicky Bills
Portsmouth City Council v Ensign – no good faith Anja Beriro and Vicky Bills
Employment update Sarah Hooton
Increase in custodial sentences for fire safety offences Carl May-Smith
Emergency Services Collaboration – a consultation Sarah Hooton
Directors’ duties in the context of local authority companies
Peter Ware
The document summarizes guidance and new regulations implementing the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. It discusses the OMB interim guidance, which emphasizes transparency and accountability in spending the $360 billion in contracts and grants. It also outlines new Federal Acquisition Regulation provisions implementing requirements for publicizing contract actions, reporting on use of funds, whistleblower protections, expanded government oversight access, and Buy American rules for construction materials.
This brief covers Legal and Institutional Issues within the CARIFORUM-EC Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA), which was concluded on December 16, 2007, and signed in October 15, 2008.
The document summarizes key aspects of the legal framework for public procurement in the CARICOM region, including two main legal instruments, objectives of transparency and fairness, and procedures to promote participation of CARICOM suppliers. It outlines the scope of the regime, protected national spaces, and requirements for procuring entities and suppliers to plan for the regional public procurement market. Suppliers are given rights to challenge and appeal procurement decisions through an independent review body to ensure fairness.
A comparative study of the provisions of the Indian Competition Act, US Anti ...Pritam Pandey
This document provides an overview of competition law in India, the United States, and the United Kingdom. It discusses key provisions and comparisons. The main points are:
1) Competition law deals with restrictive business practices and market failures. The US Sherman Act of 1890 was one of the earliest such laws. India, UK, and over 100 other countries now have competition laws.
2) The Indian Competition Act covers anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominant position, and combinations. It established the Competition Commission of India to enforce the act.
3) US and UK competition laws are more rigorously applied and enforced through criminal sanctions. Violations in India are larger in number but attract less regulatory attention.
The Competition Act 2002 provides for prohibition of abuse of dominant position. However, the provisions of unfair trade practices earlier covered by the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969,are not covered under the competition law. The apparent effect of the two being quite similar, there is a considerable possibility that a situation very close to unfair trade practices may be held to be an abuse of dominant position. The difference being very close, the article looks at the penalty handed out to DLF Ltd for abuse of dominant position from this perspective.
This document provides guidance on framework agreements under the 2006 Public Contracts and Utilities Contracts Regulations. It defines a framework agreement as an agreement between contracting authorities and economic operators that establishes terms for entering contracts during the framework period. It discusses setting up framework agreements, including considering early if it is appropriate, advertising in OJEU, and awarding the agreement. It also covers calling off individual contracts under existing frameworks in compliance with EU principles.
Similar to Brief: Understanding The Nature and Scope Of The Public Procurement Chapter Of The Epa Iu (20)
The document is the 2014-2015 Global Competitiveness Report published by the World Economic Forum. It was edited by Professor Klaus Schwab and Professor Xavier Sala-i-Martín. The report assesses the competitiveness of various countries and economies based on the Global Competitiveness Index and data from the Executive Opinion Survey. It acknowledges contributions from various partner institutes that provided important support and data.
The 2014 Annual Report is split into three main sections. The first contains a message from the WTO Director-General. The second section provides a brief overview of 2013 and some background information on the WTO, while the third has more in-depth information.
This document provides an overview of the 20th anniversary of the Association of Caribbean States (ACS), which was established in 1994 to promote cooperation among countries in the Greater Caribbean region. It discusses the ACS's origins, achievements over its first two decades, and priority areas of focus going forward such as expanding trade and investment, reducing disaster risks, sustainable tourism, and regional transportation connectivity. The ACS Secretary-General highlights progress made in 2013, including ratification of agreements and approval of projects, and looks ahead to the upcoming 6th Summit in Mexico to further consolidate cooperation efforts across the region.
The European Commission’s assessment of the likely benefits of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership
(TTIP) is based on analysis carried out by the Centre for Economic Policy Research, a leading
independent pan-European economic research organization. Given the significance of TTIP, this analysis
has been widely discussed in policy debates, in the press, on social media. The material provided in this
document attempts to answer some of the questions that have been raised in those contexts.
The Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) is responsible for the preparation of this report. U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman gratefully acknowledges the contributions of all USTR staff to the writing and production of this report and notes, in particular, the contributions of Brittany Bauer, Colby Clark, and Michael Roberts. Thanks are extended to partner Executive Branch agencies, including the Environmental Protection Agency and the Departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Health and Human Services, Justice, Labor, State, and Treasury. In preparing the report, substantial information was solicited from U.S. Embassies around the world and from interested stakeholders. The draft of this report was circulated through the interagency Trade Policy Staff Committee. March 2014Wto2014 0918a
This document discusses trade between the CARICOM region and Ghana. It finds that while CARICOM exports a modest amount to Ghana, totaling $26.8 million USD in 2012, the trade is inconsistent and concentrated in a few products like ceramics, fish, and chemicals. Ghana's economy has grown around 6% annually in recent years due to its oil, gas, agriculture and services sectors. The document recommends CARICOM explore opportunities in Ghana's growing market, as some companies like GraceKennedy have already begun operations there.
The document discusses a meeting of the Council on Trade and Economic Development (COTED) of the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) that recognized the need to address the link between trade policies, diet, and obesity in the Caribbean region. The COTED established a working group to prepare for a joint meeting in 2014 on these issues. The working group is coordinated by the Caribbean Public Health Agency, the Office of Trade Negotiations, and CARICOM. The collaboration aims to develop effective strategies to address non-communicable diseases related to poor dietary intake. The document summarizes research finding that international trade has reduced the costs of energy-dense foods high in sugars and fats, making these diets more affordable and contributing to obesity
This guide helps businesses take advantage of the WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement. The agreement simplifies customs procedures, allowing businesses to become more competitive. This jargon-free guide explains the provisions with a focus on what businesses need to know to take advantage of the agreement. It will also help policy makers identify their needs for technical assistance to implement and monitor it. - See more at: http://www.intracen.org/wto-trade-facilitation-agreement-business-guide-for-developing-countries/#sthash.UA1o6V3G.dpuf
The document summarizes the Common External Tariff (CET) structure used by CARICOM member states. It describes how the CET categorizes products as either inputs into production or final goods. These products are then further divided into competing or non-competing based on whether regional production meets 75% of regional demand. Several categories of products are given special treatment in the CET rates, including selected exports, agriculture, agricultural inputs, safety items, cost of living sensitive goods, socio-economic/cultural goods, and revenue generating items like alcohol and cigarettes.
This Working Paper was published by United Nations University Maastricht Economic and social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (UNU-MERIT). It seeks to provide insights about the main characteristics of innovative firms and to gather new evidence with regard to the nature of the innovation process in the Latin American and Caribbean region. This Paper analyses data from a number of CARICOM countries.
The Caribbean Community Regional Aid for Trade Strategy 2013-2015 aims to help CARICOM member states overcome constraints to competitiveness and trade expansion through three strategic goals: 1) Upgrading key economic infrastructure, 2) Enhancing competitiveness and trade diversification, and 3) Deepening regional integration and maximizing gains from trade agreements. The strategy identifies priority areas and "anchor" projects to achieve these goals in maritime transport, ICT, energy, trade facilitation, and private sector development. It also categorizes activities as regional, national-regional, or national to coordinate aid for trade efforts across the Caribbean.
Details for persons who are interested in attending the Caribbean Festival of the Arts (CARIFESTA) scheduled for Suriname from 16-25 August 2013 under the theme “CULTURE FOR DEVELOPMENT, Celebrating our Diversity and Promoting the Central Role of Culture in Economic, Social and Human Development”
The Caribbean Community Secretariat is seeking to fill the position of Technical Advisor in Investment and Private Sector. The position is based in Barbados and requires a candidate with at least a Master's degree and 5 years experience in investment promotion, business development, or related trade matters. Key responsibilities include providing technical support and advice on investment, serving as a liaison to private sector stakeholders, conducting research and analysis, and representing CARICOM at various meetings. The position offers an attractive remuneration package including education grants for dependents and relocation assistance.
This document celebrates the 40th anniversary of CARICOM (Caribbean Community). It contains speeches and articles from political leaders and experts reflecting on the progress and achievements of CARICOM over the past 40 years as well as the continued importance of Caribbean integration and cooperation going forward. Key points made include that CARICOM has advanced economic integration, functional cooperation, and the vision of a unified Caribbean community despite ongoing challenges. The document encourages continuing efforts to deepen regional integration to address global issues and take advantage of opportunities through a shared Caribbean identity and destiny.
The document summarizes global trade in cheese and curd. It finds that in 2011, global cheese and curd imports totaled $27.4 billion, with Germany accounting for over 15% of imports. The top 10 importing countries jointly accounted for 63.3% of global imports. While global import spending grew 4% annually from 2007-2011, some individual countries like Israel and Brazil saw above average growth. The US imposed the highest average tariffs on cheese and curd imports at over 17%. The document then analyzes cheese and curd exports from CARICOM countries, finding that exports have declined in recent years and are concentrated in a few markets like the US. Jamaica dominates CARICOM exports, though prices are higher
OTN UPDATE is the flagship electronic trade newsletter of the Office of Trade Negotiations (OTN). The newsletter provides analyses of international trade policy issues and developments relevant to the Caribbean. It focuses on the OTN's work, trade negotiation topics within its mandate, and related activities. The intention is to provide stakeholders awareness of important trade policy changes affecting the Caribbean.
The document discusses innovation emerging as a new frontier in multilateral trade cooperation at the WTO. It notes that as knowledge and creative economies grow, countries are increasingly concerned with the link between innovation, trade performance, and competitiveness. While intellectual property protection is important, innovation depends on broader factors. The prospects for multilateral trade cooperation expanding beyond reducing barriers to
The Panel on Defining the Future of Trade was established in 2012. The Panel was mandated to: “….examine and analyse challenges to global trade opening in the 21st century” against the background of profound transformations occurring in the world economy, looking “at the drivers of today’s and tomorrow’s trade, […] at trade patterns and at what it means to open global trade in the 21st century, bearing in mind the role of trade in contributing to sustainable development, growth, jobs and poverty alleviation.” This is the Report of the Panel.
More from Office of Trade Negotiations (OTN), CARICOM Secretariat (20)
World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4
World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4
World economy charts case
World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4
World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4
World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4
World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4World economy charts case study presented by a Big 4study presented by a Big 4
ZKsync airdrop of 3.6 billion ZK tokens is scheduled by ZKsync for next week.pdfSOFTTECHHUB
The world of blockchain and decentralized technologies is about to witness a groundbreaking event. ZKsync, the pioneering Ethereum Layer 2 network, has announced the highly anticipated airdrop of its native token, ZK. This move marks a significant milestone in the protocol's journey, empowering the community to take the reins and shape the future of this revolutionary ecosystem.
Methanex is the world's largest producer and supplier of methanol. We create value through our leadership in the global production, marketing and delivery of methanol to customers. View our latest Investor Presentation for more details.
Cleades Robinson, a respected leader in Philadelphia's police force, is known for his diplomatic and tactful approach, fostering a strong community rapport.
UnityNet World Environment Day Abraham Project 2024 Press ReleaseLHelferty
June 12, 2024 UnityNet International (#UNI) World Environment Day Abraham Project 2024 Press Release from Markham / Mississauga, Ontario in the, Greater Tkaronto Bioregion, Canada in the North American Great Lakes Watersheds of North America (Turtle Island).
Brief: Understanding The Nature and Scope Of The Public Procurement Chapter Of The Epa Iu
1. Jamaica Office Barbados Office Brief No.:
2nd Floor, JAMPRO Building, 3rd Floor, Mutual Building,
18 Trafalgar Road, Kingston 5, JAMAICA Hastings, Christ Church, BARBADOS 3200.3/EPA-13[08]
Tel: (876) 946-2329 Fax: (876) 978 4360 Tel: (246) 430-1670 Fax: (246) 228-9528
Email: jamaica.office@crnm.org Email: barbados.office@crnm.org
EPA Brief
The Cariforum-EC Economic Partnership
Agreement (EPA)
Understanding the Nature and Scope of the Public Procurement
Chapter in the EPA
Introduction
The Caribbean Regional Negotiating Machinery (CRNM) has noted some misunderstandings and
misinterpretation of the negotiated text in Chapter 3, Public Procurement, of the EPA. Recognizing that,
with the exception of the Dominican Republic, this is the first agreement on Public Procurement that the
majority of the CARIFORUM (CF) region has undertaken, it is critical that the provisions are accurately
interpreted and clearly understood. This brief therefore seeks to provide a detailed explanation of the key
points of the Chapter as well as any implications these may have for regional integration processes that
are planned and/or currently underway.
The Negotiated Public Procurement Commitments
There appears to be a serious misinterpretation of the negotiated Public Procurement commitments
contained in Title IV (Trade Related Issues), Chapter 3 (Public Procurement) of the EPA, in particular
sections of Articles 167 and 170, 171 and 174, as they pertain to perceived rights of market access and
consequent implications for the planned CSME Government Procurement regime. In addition, there have
been queries about the need for thresholds as well as concerns regarding the relevant negotiating
mandate. These concerns are addressed, in detail, below.
more
2. Page 2 www.crnm.org
Article 167
Scope
The provisions of this Chapter apply only to those procuring entities listed in Annex 6 and in
respect of procurements above the thresholds set out in that Annex.
The Parties and the Signatory CARIFORUM States shall ensure that the procurement of their
procuring entities covered by this Chapter takes place in a transparent manner according to the
provisions of this Chapter and the Annexes pertaining thereto, treating any eligible supplier of
either the Signatory CARIFORUM States or the EC Party equally in accordance with the principle
of open and effective competition.
2
Legal Assessment and Explanatory Detail: These provisions, being the core of the scope article,
determine the precise nature of the obligations specified in the entire chapter. It is therefore important that
these provisions be interpreted in their proper context and in line with the mandate given to the
CARIORUM Negotiators by the CARIFORUM Heads of Government.
The effect of paragraph 1 is to specifically address the commitment contained in the chapter to the
Signatory CARIFORUM States with respect only to the procurement activities carried out by the entities
specified in Annex I within the threshold limits also therein specified1. By itself, this provision is not
determinative of the issue of whether market access commitments are contained in the Chapter as it
references the need to closely examine the ensuing provisions.
It is paragraph 2 which gives the clear indication that the Chapter is not intended to be one containing
substantive market access commitments. In this regard, the most telling elements in the provision are
found in the following language. “The Parties and the Signatory CARIFORUM States shall ensure that
the procurement of their procuring entities covered by this Chapter takes place in a transparent manner
according to the provisions of this Chapter.” The highlighted portion in particular indicates that the
ensuing provisions serve only to further define the extent of the transparency obligation.
This paragraph, in effect therefore, binds the CARIFORUM States to carry out their procurement
activities (within the scope of paragraph 1 above) according to the rules of transparency set out in the
entire Chapter. It also binds CARIFORUM States to ensuring equal treatment with regards to open and
effective competition for eligible suppliers. The text does not attempt to determine who is eligible for
participation in the procurement activities of CARIFORUM States. That determination lies solely within
the discretion of the procuring entity and/or State concerned. In practical terms, if a procuring entity
offered for coverage under the EPA carries out procurement of goods with value exceeding 164,753
Euro, then that entity must follow the transparency rules of Chapter 3. However, eligibility to participate in
the procurement exercise, i.e., whether open to European suppliers, American suppliers, CARICOM
suppliers, or restricted to national, or even further – to a specific locale within the territory of the procuring
1
Euro 164,753 (goods and services) and Euro 6,909,014 (works). It is to be further noted that owing to the novelty of this area
for many CARIFORUM Member States, CARIFORUM succeeded in obtaining the highest thresholds in existing bilateral trade
agreements. In addition, we successfully limited our procuring entity coverage to Central Government only, despite the EC’s
wider coverage.
CRNM Brief
3. Page 3 www.crnm.org
State, is solely and entirely up to the procuring State. Once eligibility has been determined, then all of
the eligible suppliers (determined pursuant to a criterion that is set by the procuring State or entity) must
be treated equally in accordance with the principle of open and effective competition. This is very different
from an automatic eligibility to participate, which is what market access effectively dictates.
This is supported by the definition of “eligible supplier” contained in Article 166 which reads:
"eligible supplier means a supplier who is allowed to participate in the public procurement opportunities of
a Party or Signatory CARIFORUM State, in accordance with domestic law and without prejudice to the
provisions of this Chapter.”
Article 167.1 - Supporting the creation of regional procurement markets
1. The Parties recognize the economic importance of establishing competitive regional
procurement markets.
Explanatory Detail: This paragraph is a political statement, carrying no substantive obligation.
2. (a) With respect to any measure regarding covered procurement, each Signatory
CARIFORUM State, including its procuring entities, shall endeavour not to treat a supplier
established in any CARIFORUM State less favourably than another locally established
supplier.
Explanatory Detail: In practical terms, for CARIFORUM, this paragraph states that with regard to
procurements carried out by the Central Government entities listed in Annex I, and with values exceeding
164,753 Euro for goods and services, and 6,909,014 Euro for works, CARIFORUM State (A) will try not
to treat a supplier from CARIFORUM State (B) any less favourably than it treats a supplier established in
State CARIFORUM (A). This is the exact circumstance that currently obtains, in practice, in the
CARIFORUM States. The EPA text does not oblige CARIFORUM State (A) to grant market access to
CARIFORUM State (B). But CARIFORUM State (A) is free to do so if national laws permit. In practice,
therefore, this paragraph means that (i) CARICOM countries will continue to try to move towards the
establishment of the CSME Government Procurement regime, and (ii) CARICOM countries and the
Dominican Republic will continue to try to move toward completion of the CARICOM-DR Free Trade
Agreement, in particular the government procurement protocol. There is no right of market access
granted by the text whether in respect of the EU or intra-CARIFORUM.
There have been some questions with regard to the establishment of an EU supplier in a CARIFORUM
State, and the application of 2 (a) above in such a circumstance, as regards market access. Let us
examine the following scenario. European Supplier (A) establishes in the Dominican Republic (DR) in
accordance with the national laws governing foreign direct investment and establishment, and therefore
is no longer a European supplier in accordance with DR law. That supplier is now a bonafide legal
person of the DR and, by law, a DR supplier. Supplier (A) is a bonafide legal DR person, irrespective of
whether the establishment is in part or in whole owned by European interests. The Government of
Barbados offers a tender opportunity which interests Supplier (A). Under the EPA provision at paragraph
2 (a), there is no obligation for the Government of Barbados to treat Supplier (A) in the same manner that
it treats Barbadian suppliers. The EPA commitment is that the Government of Barbados should
CRNM Brief
4. Page 4 www.crnm.org
endeavour to do so, which is already satisfied by virtue of the fact that Barbados is party to the CSME
efforts underway to first establish a CSME GP regime and second, establish a CARICOM-DR GP regime
in accordance with the requirements of the CARICOM-DR Free Trade Agreement.
Further, some persons have queried whether the “endeavour” language is sufficient to prevent our
hypothetical DR supplier A from claiming a right to participate in the Government of Barbados’
procurement exercise, based on paragraph 2 (a) of the EPA text.
Let us be clear that one cannot seek to re-define the meaning of the word endeavour. Both in
terms of the English language established interpretation as well as “trade-speak,” the term
endeavour can in no way imply a substantive obligation which, in this case, would be to confer
rights of market access. Trade professionals are very well aware of this long established
principle, which is based numerous years of international trade precedent.
(b) With respect to any measure regarding covered procurement, the EC Party and the Signatory
CARIFORUM States, including their procuring entities:
(i) shall endeavour not to discriminate against a supplier established in either Party on
the basis that the goods or services offered by that supplier for a particular procurement
are goods or services of either Party;
Explanatory Detail: This paragraph means that if a European supplier establishes in a CARIFORUM
State according the relevant laws of that State and therefore legally becomes a CARIFORUM local
supplier, the Government of that CARIFORUM State, in its procurement activities – having determined
eligibility to participate, will try to not discriminate against this supplier on the basis that he offers
European goods or services. It also means that should the CARIFORUM State, at its own discretion,
decide to allow EC participation in a particular procurement, the Government will make efforts to not
discriminate against the EC supplier on the basis that he offers European goods and/or services for the
procurement in question.
Again, let us examine this clause using our hypothetical DR supplier (A). The Government of Jamaica
offers a tender opportunity for the purchase of goods. The Government of Jamaica, in accordance with
the relevant laws of Jamaica decides to open the procurement opportunity. DR supplier (A) submits a
tender offering to supply European-made goods. The Government of Jamaica will now evaluate all the
tenders received on the basis of the specifications contained in the tender document, and determine the
“lowest qualified tender” which will win the contract. There is no bearing on whether the goods are
European, American or Chinese. If a European Supplier in France submits a tender, the same analysis
would apply. If the Government of Jamaica, in accordance with Jamaica laws, determines that the EU
supplier is eligible to participate in its procurement opportunity, the EPA commitment means that the
Government will try not to discriminate against the EU supplier on the basis that he offers European
goods.
Nothing in this paragraph confers a right on an EU or CF supplier to access the market of any CF State.
The paragraph addresses considerations that arise after the eligibility decision has been determined by
the procuring State. If a CF government decides that, in accordance with national laws, policy or the
nature of the particular procurement, an EU supplier or CF supplier is eligible to participate in the
CRNM Brief
5. Page 5 www.crnm.org
procurement opportunity, then the EPA commitment requires the Government to try not to discriminate
against these suppliers on the basis that they offer European goods. There is no obligation to not
discriminate, and more importantly, there is absolutely no bearing on the right to access the market of
any CF State.
(ii) shall not treat a locally established supplier less favourably than another locally
established supplier on the basis of degree of foreign affiliation to or ownership by
operators or nationals of any Signatory CARIFORUM State or of the EC Party.
Explanatory Detail: In practice, this paragraph means that if a CARIFORUM or European supplier
establishes in a CARIFORUM State according to the relevant laws of establishment, and therefore
becomes a local supplier of that State, the Government, its procurement activities, will not treat this
supplier less favourably than other local suppliers on the basis of the degree of foreign ownership or
affiliation. This is the same circumstance that currently prevails in the CF States. The premise of the
paragraph is that no country, would wish to discriminate against itself in this manner, as all CF States
want to encourage FDI. Again, there is no right of market access obligation contained in this paragraph.
It should also be noted that the specific references to “covered procurement” in paragraphs 2 (a) and (b),
mean that on a proper contextual interpretation, the non-discrimination obligation in favour of both other
CARIFORUM States and the EC applies only to those procurements in respect of which there is an
obligation to abide by the negotiated transparency rules. The true nature of the provision therefore is not
one connoting a right of market access but rather, one frowning upon discrimination in the administration
of a procurement process in respect of which eligibility criteria have been determined by a CARIFORUM
State.
The concern has also been raised that paragraph 2 (b) (ii) undermines Article 32 of the Revised Treaty of
Chaguaramas (Revised Treaty). Article 32 of the Revised Treaty is headed “Prohibition of New
Restrictions on the Right of Establishment” and in order to ensure the proper achievement of the
objectives of the internal market, mandates that CSME Member States must accord rights of
establishment to all entities who meet the criteria of a community national. With respect to companies,
the qualifying criteria are set out in paragraph 5 (c) of Article 32 of the Revised Treaty. Article 32 is meant
therefore to assure automatic preferential treatment to community nationals without the need for any
further intra-regional legal instruments or bilateral arrangements. But it does not have the effect of
denying national treatment or rights of establishment to other entities who do not meet the “community
national” criteria of the provision, for example, by way of percentage foreign ownership. Such other
entities can receive rights of establishment pursuant to the terms of bilateral arrangements such as the
EPA. This decision is solely within the discretion of the CSME Member States. It should be noted that
during the discussion of this text in the Technical Working Group meetings (i.e., CF regional
consultation), no country objected to the text. The sole reservation was placed by the Government of
Trinidad & Tobago, which was subsequently withdrawn after review of the relevant national law, which
the representative stated did not allow the Government to discriminate against itself in this regard.
CRNM Brief
6. Page 6 www.crnm.org
3. Subject to paragraph 4 below, each Party, including its procuring entities, shall with respect to
any measure regarding covered procurement, accord to the goods and services of the other
Party and to suppliers of the other Party offering the goods or services of any Party, treatment
no less favourable than the treatment the Party, including its procuring entities, accords to
domestic goods, services and suppliers.
4. The Parties shall not be required to provide the treatment envisaged in paragraph 3 unless a
decision by the Joint CARIFORUM-EC Council to this effect is taken. That decision may
specify to which procurements by each Party the treatment envisaged in paragraph 3 would
apply, and under which conditions.
Explanatory Detail. Paragraphs 3-4 above constitute a straightforward built-in agenda, whereby
pursuant to a future decision of the CF-EU Joint Ministerial Council, if and when such a decision should
arise, CF and the EU will negotiate market access commitments. That there is a built-in agenda
facilitating the possibility to negotiate to market commitments at some point in the future, is itself a clear
indication that the current provisions of the Chapter do not confer and are not intended to confer market
access rights.
Queries have also been raised with respect to Article 170, and the obligation contained therein to “invite
suppliers” in light of the fact that suppliers are defined in Article 166 as being from both the EC and
CARIFORUM. The relevant Article is reproduced below.
Article 170
Selective tendering
1. Whenever selective tendering procedures are employed, procuring
entities shall:
(a) Publish a notice of intended procurement;
(b) In the notice of intended procurement invite eligible suppliers to submit a request for
participation;
(c) Select the suppliers to participate in the selective tendering procedure in a fair
manner; and
(d) Indicate the time limit for submitting requests for participation.
Explanatory Detail: The Selective Tendering method includes the publication of a notice of intended
procurement inviting interested and eligible suppliers to submit a request for participation. Such a notice
would necessarily include eligibility criteria, which – again – is determined solely at the discretion of the
State concerned. There is no obligation for a CARIFORUM State to grant access to European or any
other CARIFORUM State(s). The definition of who constitutes an eligible supplier, as contained in Article
166, states: "eligible supplier" means a supplier who is allowed to participate in the public procurement
opportunities of a Party or Signatory CARIFORUM State, in accordance with domestic law and without
prejudice to the provisions of this Chapter.
CRNM Brief
7. Page 7 www.crnm.org
Other concerns and queries raised, as well as additional misunderstandings are addressed below.
Extent of Detail of the Chapter
It should be recognized that CF and the EC negotiators agreed that the EPA should reflect international
standard and best practices, as far as practicable, as regards transparency-related rules in public
procurement. CF felt that in such a circumstance, CSME States would not be prejudiced having already
committed to adopting such standards for the CSME regime. Additionally, the DR would also not be
prejudiced having adopted similar standards as a result of the CAFTA. Indeed, several of the CSME
Member States already operate according to these practices. At the onset of substantive negotiations
both Sides in a TNG proposed and discussed and agreed on elements to be negotiated as part of the
Chapter, and throughout the negotiating process CF and the EC both made a number of proposals. The
CF Member States in Technical Working Group (TWG) meetings discussed and agreed on CF
proposals, and alternative proposals prior to putting anything on the formal negotiating table with the EC.
As a result, the Chapter contains far less detail than the EC would have liked, because CF adamantly
refused to include certain elements or sub-elements that the CF negotiators perceived to have a
substantive bearing on market access although the elements themselves may have been transparency-
related.
The Necessity for Thresholds
There must be a threshold, for efficiency purposes, below which the provisions of the Chapter would not
apply. Otherwise, procuring entities would find themselves bound to fulfilling all of the requirements of the
chapter in order to execute relatively small value procurements, for example, to purchase a box of #10
pencils. The threshold is a safeguard that tries to ensure that the cost of the procurement process does
not exceed the value of the goods or services being procured. The absence of thresholds in the EPA
Chapter would effectively negate the purpose of employing transparency and tendering methods - which
is to assist in achieving value for money objectives.
Article 174, Qualification of Suppliers seems to confer rights of access to CF markets
on EU suppliers
It is always important in reading the text to keep in mind that the entire chapter is subject to Article 167
which defines the scope of all of the commitments to be undertaken. It is also important to understand
certain basic terms and expressions in Public Procurement. In this regard, qualification addresses the
capacity to perform a particular contract, while eligibility refers to the right to access the market. These
are two different and distinct elements of the procurement process, where eligibility is a necessary pre-
requisite for qualification, as no supplier will expend his efforts and monies to qualify for a procurement
opportunity in which he is not eligible to participate.
CRNM Brief
8. Page 8 www.crnm.org
Article 174 has no bearing on eligibility; it deals solely with capacity to perform a particular contract (e.g.,
technical competence, financial strength, technological competence, etc.) after eligibility has been
established. Further recall that the EPA does not seek to prejudice or prescribe eligibility in any way. The
eligibility decision remains within the sole discretion of the procuring State.
The EPA thresholds pre-emptively deny CSME States the opportunity to revise
domestic thresholds and agree on what the CSME levels should be
The EPA threshold is a transparency threshold which has no bearing or impact on the market access
and process thresholds existing in the Member States and those that may be set for application in the
CSME. There seems to be some confusion in the understanding of the function of a market access
threshold as opposed to a transparency threshold. The essential function of the EPA transparency
threshold, in practice, is that when procuring entities make purchases above a certain value, they must
abide by certain publication requirements. This has no bearing on who the procuring entity decides to
grant permission to participate in its procurement opportunity, which would be governed by a market
access threshold. A CSME State or the Community itself can choose to set its market access thresholds
at its discretion and in accordance with its needs. A transparency threshold operates differently from a
market access threshold; the former setting the value above which governments undertake be
transparent in their procurement activities, and the latter setting the value above which governments
undertake to grant rights of access to their procurement markets. The one does not impact the other.
They require different actions.
The Limited Tendering Provisions in Article 171 of the EPA undermine the CSME
because the EPA rules are the same as those planned for CSME. The EPA rules
needed to be more stringent and different in order to be differentiated from the CSME
It is always important to clearly understand the facts and issues at hand. Limited tendering is a
procurement method that allows the procuring entity to contract directly with a supplier without executing
a competitive tender process. The conditions under which limited tendering can be employed as set out
in Article 171 of the EPA, are the same as those which are planned for use in the CSME government
procurement regime. In the first instance, international standards and best practices dictate what the
conditions for use of the limited tendering method of procurement should be. It is these standards that
informed the CSME conditions. That the conditions in Article 171 of the EPA are the same as those
planned for the CSME was a necessary and deliberate act on the part of the CF negotiators. Consider
the hypothetical circumstance wherein the CSME regime allows for the use of limited tendering in the
case of contracts awarded to the winner of a design contest, but the EPA being more stringent and does
not afford this flexibility. Each time that a CSME State attempted to take advantage of this flexibility it
would be in violation of the EPA. In this circumstance it is critical to ensure that the EPA provisions are, at
minimum, equal to those which are planned for the CSME in order to safeguard the CSME flexibilities.
EPA conditions for limited tendering that are more stringent than those planned for the CSME would
undermine the relevant flexibilities in the CSME.
CRNM Brief
9. Page 9 www.crnm.org
The Negotiating Mandate was exceeded and/or its Restrictions were ignored
This is indeed a very serious allegation and is being taken as such by the relevant CF Negotiators.
The need to clearly understand the negotiating mandate is primary and crucial. The mandate was to
"exclude market access commitments." That was the CF red line position. This has, somehow has
become inter-changeably used with "transparency only," but the two are different things entirely. In the
true technical sense, Transparency is not a discipline in procurement. It is an attribute or principle that
dictates how you go about carrying out the various GP disciplines including market access. The principle
of transparency and being transparent in procurement activities underlies and permeates all of the
elements and disciplines in procurement, including market access. It is important therefore to begin to
accurately reflect the true CF mandate so that the current misuse of terms does not continue to be
inadvertently promulgated.
It is also important to recognize that, irrespective of nomenclature and titles, there can be no agreement
where it is possible to have pure transparency only. What would happen to the fairness provisions, or the
due process provisions? How would such an agreement be enforced in the absence of these provisions?
It must also be appreciated that the EPA process was a negotiation and there is no negotiation in the
world in which any party will obtain precisely what it desires in every respect. The very nature of a
negotiation necessarily implies compromise. The Council on Trade and Economic Development
(COTED) expressed a desire to exclude the initial European proposal on the paragraphs discussed at
Article 167 (which at the time of review by the COTED contained binding rules-based commitments as
opposed to the current “endeavour” language) due to market access implications. CARIFORUM
negotiators were not successful in getting the paragraphs excised, but remained within the mandate to
exclude market access obligations by eventually obtaining EU agreement on the insertion of “endeavour”
language, which substantially altered the nature and scope of the original text.
The final negotiating mandate issued November 15, 2007 is reproduced below:
“THE CARIFORUM COUNCIL:
Reiterated its decision not to offer market access in relation to Government
Procurement;
Agreed that Article 3.1, “Supporting the Creation of Regional Procurement
Markets” of the Draft EPA be amended to reflect the above decision.”
It is clear that the CF Negotiators acted in accordance with the negotiating mandate, ensuring (i) that the
Chapter did not grant rights of market access, and (ii) that the EC's proposals for paragraphs 3-6 were
amended to reflect that there should be no rights of market access granted. In so doing, the pace and
content of the Region’s integration agenda were safeguarded and are not negatively affected by
negotiated commitments.
CRNM Brief
10. Page 10 www.crnm.org
The Necessity for the Chapter
The importance of this Chapter should not be underestimated. Transparency can only improve the
national processes, permitting a greater level of scrutiny and consequently an improvement in
compliance with established procedures in the pursuit of value for money objectives. The cooperation
provisions in Article 182 have already given rise to the preparation of a document detailing the needs to
be addressed in the CF Member States at the regional, sub-regional, and national levels in order to
comply with the EPA commitments. The document, which has been approved by the relevant CF and
EU authorities, includes activities (as identified by the MS and the relevant regional authorities) in support
of establishing the CSME regime, improving national regimes, and a financing proposal for approximately
US$10M in support of undertaking the identified activities. Further, this is the only Government
Procurement Agreement in the world that excludes market access commitments. The WTO Working
Group on Transparency in Government Procurement (WGTGP) tried unsuccessfully for over six (6)
years to create a clear distinction between market access and transparency elements of government
procurement. Their difficulty was compounded by the fact that there are market access elements in
transparency and transparency elements in market access. Consequently, an artificial divide is very
difficult to create. CARIFORUM’s success in this regard is the first of its kind in such negotiations
worldwide. The import of this achievement is that in future negotiations, particularly with larger developing
and/or developed countries, CF has the benefit of the indisputable precedent that, despite the failure of
the WTO’s bid, such an agreement is indeed possible.
Implications for the Planned CSME Government Procurement Regime
The foregoing should have clearly established that, in accordance with the CF Negotiating Mandate, the
provisions of the EPA Chapter on Public Procurement do not confer and are not intended to confer rights
of market access as between CARIFORUM and the EC, and/or among CARIFORUM States. The key
impact that the EPA commitments will have on the CSME regime is in the provision of cooperation and
assistance to facilitate the development and implementation of the CSME regime, as well as to improve
national processes, as necessary, in order to be in compliance with the CSME regime.
General Observations
Some of the queries and concerns as well as conclusions drawn indicate an alarming lack of
understanding of the basics of public procurement. It is against this background that the CSME States, in
particular, are in the midst of the fight for their survival in an ever increasing global pace of trade
liberalization. The time is now to begin to pay much closer attention to this critically important arena of
public policy and operations. States are encouraged to focus urgent attention on improving the training,
skills and techniques and overall understanding of relevant personnel. This need is more urgent in light of
the fact the we are now Party to one government procurement agreement, with another much more
comprehensive undertaking coming quickly on its heels. And while the EPA grants transition periods up
to a maximum of five (5) years, the planned CSME regime should be underway way before that period is
expired.
CRNM Brief
11. Page 11 www.crnm.org
Further, in a global environment of increasingly scarce resources, government suppliers are going to be
looking more and more towards developing country markets for procurement opportunities. As
developing countries, therefore, it should be no surprise that we will come under increased pressure from
real and potential trading partners to permit them access to our government procurement markets. There
is tremendous risk that we will not be able to successfully address and manage these pressures in
accordance with our own needs and interests and at our own pace, if we do not quickly and extensively
improve our understanding of this subject, both as individual States and collectively as a Region. It is the
hope of the CRNM that the relevant authorities will act with dispatch to do so.
Want to know more
about the Economic
Partnership
Agreement?
Please Visit:
http://www.crnm.o
rg/feed.htm
CRNM Brief