The document discusses the benefits of exercise for mental health. Regular physical activity can help reduce anxiety and depression and improve mood and cognitive function. Exercise causes chemical changes in the brain that may help protect against mental illness and improve symptoms.
Devoe notes on harassment of lori handrahan by michael waxmanDocumentsforMila
Mr. Waxman engaged in a pattern of intimidating behavior directed at Lori Handrahan and others involved in her legal case, intended to cause fear and control the situation. This included threats, relentless legal actions, attempts to damage reputations, and inappropriate personal interest in Handrahan's daughter. As a result, Handrahan experienced extreme fear, anxiety, and felt unsafe and without protection. Others were also intimidated into leaving the case or resigning roles, leaving Handrahan without support.
Leslie Drozd has extensive experience as a clinical psychologist and marriage and family therapist. She received her PhD in clinical psychology from the California School of Professional Psychology in 1986 and has been licensed as a clinical psychologist since 1988. She has maintained a private practice since 1988 specializing in child custody cases, family violence, substance abuse, and high conflict families. She has also served as an expert witness in family law courts since 1989 conducting over 1,000 child custody evaluations.
This letter is a complaint submitted to the Board of Overseers of the Bar against attorney Michael Waxman. It states that three Grievance Panels have found probable cause and recommended sanctions against Waxman, while a fourth issued a warning for losing professional objectivity and maligning or threatening other attorneys. Despite these warnings, the letter says Waxman has continued the problematic behavior, as shown in recently submitted emails. The complainant expresses feeling exhausted, stalked, and persecuted by Waxman's actions and wants the harassment to end so she can rebuild her life and ensure her daughter's future and protection from abuse.
Bonnie lewis' email about dean crocker maine children alliance report on milaDocumentsforMila
The document is an email from Bonnie Lewis to Lori Handrahan informing her that Bonnie has contacted the MCA to remove her name from the Advisory Board and warn them about the situation regarding an Ombudsman report. Bonnie asked the MCA to remove her from the Advisory Board in light of the report and shared what she knows about the situation mentioned in the report.
Igor provided inconsistent and contradictory accounts of his childhood abuse, a violent incident when he was 16 that injured another boy, and a domestic abuse episode involving his wife Lori and a peanut butter jar. He also gave varying reasons for his mental health issues, use of violence, and level of contribution to household responsibilities. The author concludes Igor was highly dishonest, particularly with the psychologist evaluating the case, and misrepresented his role in the family in order to shift focus onto Lori's mental state and avoid accountability for his own actions and violence.
Mr. Rodway cannot represent Mr. Waxman in his final Bar Hearing because Mr. Rodway may be called as a witness. Ms. Handrahan's attorney, Mr. Altshuler, previously discussed Mr. Waxman's behavior with Mr. Rodway prior to Mr. Waxman's disqualification hearing last July. Ms. Handrahan is informing the Board of Overseers of the Bar of her understanding that Mr. Rodway cannot represent Mr. Waxman due to his potential role as a witness in the hearing.
The document discusses the benefits of exercise for mental health. Regular physical activity can help reduce anxiety and depression and improve mood and cognitive function. Exercise causes chemical changes in the brain that may help protect against mental illness and improve symptoms.
Devoe notes on harassment of lori handrahan by michael waxmanDocumentsforMila
Mr. Waxman engaged in a pattern of intimidating behavior directed at Lori Handrahan and others involved in her legal case, intended to cause fear and control the situation. This included threats, relentless legal actions, attempts to damage reputations, and inappropriate personal interest in Handrahan's daughter. As a result, Handrahan experienced extreme fear, anxiety, and felt unsafe and without protection. Others were also intimidated into leaving the case or resigning roles, leaving Handrahan without support.
Leslie Drozd has extensive experience as a clinical psychologist and marriage and family therapist. She received her PhD in clinical psychology from the California School of Professional Psychology in 1986 and has been licensed as a clinical psychologist since 1988. She has maintained a private practice since 1988 specializing in child custody cases, family violence, substance abuse, and high conflict families. She has also served as an expert witness in family law courts since 1989 conducting over 1,000 child custody evaluations.
This letter is a complaint submitted to the Board of Overseers of the Bar against attorney Michael Waxman. It states that three Grievance Panels have found probable cause and recommended sanctions against Waxman, while a fourth issued a warning for losing professional objectivity and maligning or threatening other attorneys. Despite these warnings, the letter says Waxman has continued the problematic behavior, as shown in recently submitted emails. The complainant expresses feeling exhausted, stalked, and persecuted by Waxman's actions and wants the harassment to end so she can rebuild her life and ensure her daughter's future and protection from abuse.
Bonnie lewis' email about dean crocker maine children alliance report on milaDocumentsforMila
The document is an email from Bonnie Lewis to Lori Handrahan informing her that Bonnie has contacted the MCA to remove her name from the Advisory Board and warn them about the situation regarding an Ombudsman report. Bonnie asked the MCA to remove her from the Advisory Board in light of the report and shared what she knows about the situation mentioned in the report.
Igor provided inconsistent and contradictory accounts of his childhood abuse, a violent incident when he was 16 that injured another boy, and a domestic abuse episode involving his wife Lori and a peanut butter jar. He also gave varying reasons for his mental health issues, use of violence, and level of contribution to household responsibilities. The author concludes Igor was highly dishonest, particularly with the psychologist evaluating the case, and misrepresented his role in the family in order to shift focus onto Lori's mental state and avoid accountability for his own actions and violence.
Mr. Rodway cannot represent Mr. Waxman in his final Bar Hearing because Mr. Rodway may be called as a witness. Ms. Handrahan's attorney, Mr. Altshuler, previously discussed Mr. Waxman's behavior with Mr. Rodway prior to Mr. Waxman's disqualification hearing last July. Ms. Handrahan is informing the Board of Overseers of the Bar of her understanding that Mr. Rodway cannot represent Mr. Waxman due to his potential role as a witness in the hearing.
The document discusses the benefits of exercise for mental health. Regular physical activity can help reduce anxiety and depression and improve mood and cognitive functioning. Exercise causes chemical changes in the brain that may help protect against mental illness and improve symptoms.
This letter requests that the Chief Judge investigate the conduct of a guardian ad litem, Liz Stout, in a custody case involving a two-year-old child, Mila Malenko. The letter writer claims that Ms. Stout ignored and withheld evidence demonstrating safety concerns for the mother and child, and showed a bias in favor of the father rather than the child's best interests. Documents from the case including reports and appeals filed are included with the letter. The letter requests a review of Ms. Stout's conduct in this and other cases, and that she be removed from serving as a guardian ad litem due to improperly recommending children be returned to abusive situations.
This document is a series of emails between Dr. Carl Baum, Eileen King, and various officials in Maine's DHHS regarding an investigation into a child named Mila Malenko. Dr. Baum confirms that he has not retracted or softened his previous assessment that no child should have methamphetamines in their system and the levels found in Mila's case have not been adequately explained. Eileen King expresses concern that DHHS has closed the investigation without resolution and urges them to reopen it, as the child remains at risk.
The letter provides evidence of Mr. Waxman driving a campaign of character defamation against the author and her daughter. It includes emails showing Mr. Waxman instructing his client to reject reasonable changes to custody arrangements and instead continue legal proceedings. The author argues Mr. Waxman has lied extensively in legal documents and proceedings. She believes she has become a target for Mr. Waxman's negative feelings about women following three divorces. The letter asks the Board to intervene in Mr. Waxman's behavior, which has financially and emotionally destroyed the author's life.
Lori Handrahan is requesting an investigation into opposing counsel Michael Waxman's behavior in her child custody case for several reasons: [1] His personal involvement and apparent vendetta against her; [2] His threats to use improper influence and the "substantial resources" of his family against her; [3] His constant improper legal actions intended to harass and maliciously injure her and her daughter. [4] His systematic harassment and intimidation of her caregivers to render her unable to work. She provides examples of threatening emails from Waxman and describes incidents where he harassed caregivers in front of her daughter, leaving the child traumatized.
Lori Handrahan submitted a letter to the Board of Overseers of the Bar regarding her lawyer Rodway's behavior. She states that emails from another lawyer, Mr. Waxman, that she previously submitted show he continues to malign her and threaten other lawyers. Despite a warning from the Grievance Panel about his behavior, Waxman sent more emails doing the same. Handrahan does not want Waxman near her daughter and finds his stated desire to spend time with her daughter disturbing. She notes that three Grievance Panels have found cause to sanction Waxman but he has ignored their findings. Handrahan concludes Waxman must believe he is above the rules or will face
Lori Handrahan wrote to Chief Judge Ann Murray requesting an investigation into the guardian ad litem Liz Stout and the resulting custody judgment in the case of Lori's daughter Mila Malenko. The judge's ruling followed all of Liz Stout's recommendations and disregarded evidence contradicting her findings, including testimony from domestic violence experts. Lori believes both the GAL and court-appointed psychologist failed to properly investigate and exhibited bias towards the known abuser, placing Lori, Mila, and other survivors of abuse at risk. She is requesting the office obtain justice and a fair hearing in line with Maine laws regarding GAL practice and the safety of children.
The letter requests that the Chief Judge investigate the conduct of a guardian ad litem, Liz Stout, in a child custody case involving the writer's daughter. The writer alleges that Ms. Stout made recommendations against the child's best interests and in violation of family law, which negatively impacted the writer financially and professionally. Despite previous requests, the office has refused to investigate until the case was closed. The writer believes Ms. Stout should be removed from the guardian ad litem roster to prevent similar situations in the future. Having lost faith in the legal system, the writer is considering working with media to produce a piece on the guardian ad litem system in Maine.
Charles C. LaVerdiere, Deputy Chief Judge, responds to Lori Handrahan's third request to investigate Elizabeth Stout, the Guardian ad litem in her case PORDC-FM-2008-510. LaVerdiere reminds Handrahan that his prior two letters stated the Office does not have authority to review or act in pending cases. As the case remains active in Portland District Court, Rule II(4)(a) prevents the Chief Judge from taking action or initiating a review of complaints arising from pending cases. Therefore, the Office is without jurisdiction and will take no further action on Handrahan's complaint.
A mother filed a new complaint with the Board of Overseers of the Bar regarding Mr. Waxman. The Ellsworth District Court had granted the mother a temporary protection from harassment order for her and her three-year old daughter against Mr. Waxman. The daughter was coming home asking why Mr. Waxman loved her and was apparently spending overnights with the daughter. The mother included the protection order, four emails Mr. Waxman sent since the order, and a review of his 2009 emails with the new complaint.
This letter is the author's sixth request to investigate GAL Liz Stout for alleged misconduct and collusion with the opposing attorney in her case. Previous requests and letters have gone unanswered. The author cites sections of Maine GAL rules that allow for ongoing oversight of GALs and emergency removal from the roster. The author argues that in Stout's case, where she acknowledged risk of abuse but recommended joint custody and the child was later abused, constitutes grounds for emergency removal. The Chief Judge's refusal to investigate, the author says, violates the goals of the GAL rules to protect children's best interests.
- The letter is from Dr. Lori Handrahan to Chief Judge Ann M. Murray regarding concerns about GAL Liz Stout and Dr. Carol Kabacoff in a custody case involving Dr. Handrahan and Igor Malenko.
- Dr. Handrahan provides a list of over 15 experts in domestic violence and child abuse who raised issues about Mr. Malenko's history of violence but whose testimonies were ignored by Dr. Kabacoff and Ms. Stout.
- Dr. Handrahan alleges that Dr. Kabacoff, Ms. Stout, and Judge Moskowitz only found Mr. Malenko and each other credible, while dismissing all
Mr. Waxman had frequent contact with Mila Malenko from 2009-2010, including birthday celebrations and gift giving, despite objections from Mila's mother Dr. Handrahan and her attorney. Mr. Waxman made numerous threats against Dr. Handrahan, including trying to strip her of parental rights or get sole custody. He also repeatedly accused her of mental illness and being unfit to parent.
1. The document reviews issues around joint custody of a child named Mila between Dr. Handrahan and Mr. Malenko from 2009-2010.
2. It describes disputes over the original divorce custody schedule, visitation compliance, stressful transitions between parents due to threats and accusations, and Mr. Malenko failing to pay child support and oppose Dr. Handrahan's relocation for work.
3. The review covers other issues like lost childcare, disputes over extracurricular activities, threats of contempt from Mr. Malenko/his lawyer Mr. Waxman, and allegations of attempted influence and confidential information access by Mr. Waxman.
Waxman 1 feb email saying the court has no power over him in any fashionDocumentsforMila
In a response email, a lawyer tells Judy that he will not substantially alter his law firm website as requested and will not allow his client to agree to the changes. He also expresses doubts about the court having any authority over him personally.
Steve pickering title 22 three party peitition to protect mila denied by judgeDocumentsforMila
This affidavit from a retired Maine State Police detective describes the events and disclosures surrounding allegations of sexual abuse of a 4-year-old girl, Mila Malenko, by her father Igor Malenko in June and July 2009. Mila's mother, Lori Handrahan, reported that Mila made disclosures to her of inappropriate touching by her father. Mila was taken to medical appointments where physical signs of irritation in her vaginal area were observed. Mila repeated her disclosures to other individuals as well. A child abuse interviewer from Spurwink recommended supervised contact only between Mila and her father, but DHHS reversed this decision.
The document discusses the benefits of exercise for mental health. Regular physical activity can help reduce anxiety and depression and improve mood and cognitive functioning. Exercise causes chemical changes in the brain that may help protect against mental illness and improve symptoms.
This letter requests that the Chief Judge investigate the conduct of a guardian ad litem, Liz Stout, in a custody case involving a two-year-old child, Mila Malenko. The letter writer claims that Ms. Stout ignored and withheld evidence demonstrating safety concerns for the mother and child, and showed a bias in favor of the father rather than the child's best interests. Documents from the case including reports and appeals filed are included with the letter. The letter requests a review of Ms. Stout's conduct in this and other cases, and that she be removed from serving as a guardian ad litem due to improperly recommending children be returned to abusive situations.
This document is a series of emails between Dr. Carl Baum, Eileen King, and various officials in Maine's DHHS regarding an investigation into a child named Mila Malenko. Dr. Baum confirms that he has not retracted or softened his previous assessment that no child should have methamphetamines in their system and the levels found in Mila's case have not been adequately explained. Eileen King expresses concern that DHHS has closed the investigation without resolution and urges them to reopen it, as the child remains at risk.
The letter provides evidence of Mr. Waxman driving a campaign of character defamation against the author and her daughter. It includes emails showing Mr. Waxman instructing his client to reject reasonable changes to custody arrangements and instead continue legal proceedings. The author argues Mr. Waxman has lied extensively in legal documents and proceedings. She believes she has become a target for Mr. Waxman's negative feelings about women following three divorces. The letter asks the Board to intervene in Mr. Waxman's behavior, which has financially and emotionally destroyed the author's life.
Lori Handrahan is requesting an investigation into opposing counsel Michael Waxman's behavior in her child custody case for several reasons: [1] His personal involvement and apparent vendetta against her; [2] His threats to use improper influence and the "substantial resources" of his family against her; [3] His constant improper legal actions intended to harass and maliciously injure her and her daughter. [4] His systematic harassment and intimidation of her caregivers to render her unable to work. She provides examples of threatening emails from Waxman and describes incidents where he harassed caregivers in front of her daughter, leaving the child traumatized.
Lori Handrahan submitted a letter to the Board of Overseers of the Bar regarding her lawyer Rodway's behavior. She states that emails from another lawyer, Mr. Waxman, that she previously submitted show he continues to malign her and threaten other lawyers. Despite a warning from the Grievance Panel about his behavior, Waxman sent more emails doing the same. Handrahan does not want Waxman near her daughter and finds his stated desire to spend time with her daughter disturbing. She notes that three Grievance Panels have found cause to sanction Waxman but he has ignored their findings. Handrahan concludes Waxman must believe he is above the rules or will face
Lori Handrahan wrote to Chief Judge Ann Murray requesting an investigation into the guardian ad litem Liz Stout and the resulting custody judgment in the case of Lori's daughter Mila Malenko. The judge's ruling followed all of Liz Stout's recommendations and disregarded evidence contradicting her findings, including testimony from domestic violence experts. Lori believes both the GAL and court-appointed psychologist failed to properly investigate and exhibited bias towards the known abuser, placing Lori, Mila, and other survivors of abuse at risk. She is requesting the office obtain justice and a fair hearing in line with Maine laws regarding GAL practice and the safety of children.
The letter requests that the Chief Judge investigate the conduct of a guardian ad litem, Liz Stout, in a child custody case involving the writer's daughter. The writer alleges that Ms. Stout made recommendations against the child's best interests and in violation of family law, which negatively impacted the writer financially and professionally. Despite previous requests, the office has refused to investigate until the case was closed. The writer believes Ms. Stout should be removed from the guardian ad litem roster to prevent similar situations in the future. Having lost faith in the legal system, the writer is considering working with media to produce a piece on the guardian ad litem system in Maine.
Charles C. LaVerdiere, Deputy Chief Judge, responds to Lori Handrahan's third request to investigate Elizabeth Stout, the Guardian ad litem in her case PORDC-FM-2008-510. LaVerdiere reminds Handrahan that his prior two letters stated the Office does not have authority to review or act in pending cases. As the case remains active in Portland District Court, Rule II(4)(a) prevents the Chief Judge from taking action or initiating a review of complaints arising from pending cases. Therefore, the Office is without jurisdiction and will take no further action on Handrahan's complaint.
A mother filed a new complaint with the Board of Overseers of the Bar regarding Mr. Waxman. The Ellsworth District Court had granted the mother a temporary protection from harassment order for her and her three-year old daughter against Mr. Waxman. The daughter was coming home asking why Mr. Waxman loved her and was apparently spending overnights with the daughter. The mother included the protection order, four emails Mr. Waxman sent since the order, and a review of his 2009 emails with the new complaint.
This letter is the author's sixth request to investigate GAL Liz Stout for alleged misconduct and collusion with the opposing attorney in her case. Previous requests and letters have gone unanswered. The author cites sections of Maine GAL rules that allow for ongoing oversight of GALs and emergency removal from the roster. The author argues that in Stout's case, where she acknowledged risk of abuse but recommended joint custody and the child was later abused, constitutes grounds for emergency removal. The Chief Judge's refusal to investigate, the author says, violates the goals of the GAL rules to protect children's best interests.
- The letter is from Dr. Lori Handrahan to Chief Judge Ann M. Murray regarding concerns about GAL Liz Stout and Dr. Carol Kabacoff in a custody case involving Dr. Handrahan and Igor Malenko.
- Dr. Handrahan provides a list of over 15 experts in domestic violence and child abuse who raised issues about Mr. Malenko's history of violence but whose testimonies were ignored by Dr. Kabacoff and Ms. Stout.
- Dr. Handrahan alleges that Dr. Kabacoff, Ms. Stout, and Judge Moskowitz only found Mr. Malenko and each other credible, while dismissing all
Mr. Waxman had frequent contact with Mila Malenko from 2009-2010, including birthday celebrations and gift giving, despite objections from Mila's mother Dr. Handrahan and her attorney. Mr. Waxman made numerous threats against Dr. Handrahan, including trying to strip her of parental rights or get sole custody. He also repeatedly accused her of mental illness and being unfit to parent.
1. The document reviews issues around joint custody of a child named Mila between Dr. Handrahan and Mr. Malenko from 2009-2010.
2. It describes disputes over the original divorce custody schedule, visitation compliance, stressful transitions between parents due to threats and accusations, and Mr. Malenko failing to pay child support and oppose Dr. Handrahan's relocation for work.
3. The review covers other issues like lost childcare, disputes over extracurricular activities, threats of contempt from Mr. Malenko/his lawyer Mr. Waxman, and allegations of attempted influence and confidential information access by Mr. Waxman.
Waxman 1 feb email saying the court has no power over him in any fashionDocumentsforMila
In a response email, a lawyer tells Judy that he will not substantially alter his law firm website as requested and will not allow his client to agree to the changes. He also expresses doubts about the court having any authority over him personally.
Steve pickering title 22 three party peitition to protect mila denied by judgeDocumentsforMila
This affidavit from a retired Maine State Police detective describes the events and disclosures surrounding allegations of sexual abuse of a 4-year-old girl, Mila Malenko, by her father Igor Malenko in June and July 2009. Mila's mother, Lori Handrahan, reported that Mila made disclosures to her of inappropriate touching by her father. Mila was taken to medical appointments where physical signs of irritation in her vaginal area were observed. Mila repeated her disclosures to other individuals as well. A child abuse interviewer from Spurwink recommended supervised contact only between Mila and her father, but DHHS reversed this decision.
The document discusses the benefits of exercise for mental health. Regular physical activity can help reduce anxiety and depression and improve mood and cognitive functioning. Exercise causes chemical changes in the brain that may help protect against mental illness and improve symptoms.
The document summarizes a letter from the Board of Overseers of the Bar regarding a grievance complaint against attorney Michael J. Waxman. A Grievance Commission panel found probable cause that Waxman engaged in misconduct subject to sanction. The office of Bar Counsel will now prepare a formal petition for disciplinary proceedings against Waxman before a different Grievance Commission panel. Both the complainant, Lori Handrahan, and Waxman will receive notice of the disciplinary hearing date.
Overseers of the bar grievance panel waxman bar nov 5 2009DocumentsforMila
The Board of Overseers of the Bar is established by the Maine Supreme Judicial Court to regulate attorney conduct. The Board has several members and staff, including an Executive Director and Bar Counsel. In this letter, the Bar Counsel notifies Lori Handrahan and attorney Michael J. Waxman that a Grievance Commission panel found probable cause that Waxman engaged in misconduct subject to sanction. As a result, Bar Counsel will prepare a formal petition for disciplinary proceedings before a new Grievance Commission panel regarding grievance complaint 09-204.
The document is a letter from the Board of Overseers of the Bar notifying Lori Handrahan and Peter Rodway, Esq. that a Grievance Commission panel reviewed a complaint regarding attorney Michael Waxman and dismissed it with a warning. The panel found that Waxman became personally involved in a client's case, maligned Handrahan, and threatened another attorney, but that the misconduct was minor. As a result, the complaint was dismissed and Waxman was warned to refrain from such behavior in the future. The letter notes that a dismissal with warning is confidential and not a formal discipline.
This letter requests that Judge Bradley take judicial notice of recent police reports when considering the credibility determinations made in a prior divorce judgment. The letter references a police report where the ex-husband, Mr. Malenko, is shown shoplifting on video with his three-year-old daughter but continues to lie to the police about it. The letter asks Judge Bradley to weigh this new evidence of Mr. Malenko lying against the prior finding that he was credible and the ex-wife was not credible.
The document discusses the benefits of exercise for mental health. Regular physical activity can help reduce anxiety and depression and improve mood and cognitive functioning. Exercise stimulates the production of endorphins in the brain which elevate mood and reduce stress levels.
Lesley devoe reply to dean crocker maine children's allianceDocumentsforMila
The document is a letter from Lesley Devoe, LCSW to Dean Crocker, MSW regarding the case of Lori Handrahan and Igor Malenko. It summarizes in great detail discrepancies in Igor Malenko's statements to various professionals involved in the case regarding his history of violence, parenting abilities, and truthfulness. It raises concerns that Mr. Malenko has provided misinformation that has influenced the case's momentum against Ms. Handrahan and that professionals have overlooked serious red flags in Mr. Malenko's background and behavior.
The document discusses the authority of a governor to intervene in a child protective services case. It provides opinions from legal experts that a governor, as the head of the executive branch, has the power to direct actions by executive agencies and appoint/remove agency heads. The document also examines Maine's constitution and case law, finding that governors have a duty to ensure laws are faithfully executed and oversee the executive branch. It concludes that the Maine governor has the authority to order the DHHS to substantiate abuse findings and follow an expert organization's recommendations in the child's case.
Judy potter's letter to gov le page final july 2011DocumentsforMila
Judy Potter, an attorney, writes to Governor LePage with concerns about the Maine DHHS's handling of the case of Mila Malenko. Potter questions why the conclusions of a psychological evaluation from Spurwink were dismissed by DHHS. Potter also raises issues with inconsistent statements from DHHS officials about the reasons for rejecting the Spurwink report and allegations of coaching. Potter believes DHHS notified parties of its conclusions at different times inappropriately and questions the basis for closing the case without a full investigation.
Discover timeless style with the 2022 Vintage Roman Numerals Men's Ring. Crafted from premium stainless steel, this 6mm wide ring embodies elegance and durability. Perfect as a gift, it seamlessly blends classic Roman numeral detailing with modern sophistication, making it an ideal accessory for any occasion.
https://rb.gy/usj1a2
Profiles of Iconic Fashion Personalities.pdfTTop Threads
The fashion industry is dynamic and ever-changing, continuously sculpted by trailblazing visionaries who challenge norms and redefine beauty. This document delves into the profiles of some of the most iconic fashion personalities whose impact has left a lasting impression on the industry. From timeless designers to modern-day influencers, each individual has uniquely woven their thread into the rich fabric of fashion history, contributing to its ongoing evolution.
Digital Marketing with a Focus on Sustainabilitysssourabhsharma
Digital Marketing best practices including influencer marketing, content creators, and omnichannel marketing for Sustainable Brands at the Sustainable Cosmetics Summit 2024 in New York
Anny Serafina Love - Letter of Recommendation by Kellen Harkins, MS.AnnySerafinaLove
This letter, written by Kellen Harkins, Course Director at Full Sail University, commends Anny Love's exemplary performance in the Video Sharing Platforms class. It highlights her dedication, willingness to challenge herself, and exceptional skills in production, editing, and marketing across various video platforms like YouTube, TikTok, and Instagram.
The Steadfast and Reliable Bull: Taurus Zodiac Signmy Pandit
Explore the steadfast and reliable nature of the Taurus Zodiac Sign. Discover the personality traits, key dates, and horoscope insights that define the determined and practical Taurus, and learn how their grounded nature makes them the anchor of the zodiac.
4 Benefits of Partnering with an OnlyFans Agency for Content Creators.pdfonlyfansmanagedau
In the competitive world of content creation, standing out and maximising revenue on platforms like OnlyFans can be challenging. This is where partnering with an OnlyFans agency can make a significant difference. Here are five key benefits for content creators considering this option:
How are Lilac French Bulldogs Beauty Charming the World and Capturing Hearts....Lacey Max
“After being the most listed dog breed in the United States for 31
years in a row, the Labrador Retriever has dropped to second place
in the American Kennel Club's annual survey of the country's most
popular canines. The French Bulldog is the new top dog in the
United States as of 2022. The stylish puppy has ascended the
rankings in rapid time despite having health concerns and limited
color choices.”
NIMA2024 | De toegevoegde waarde van DEI en ESG in campagnes | Nathalie Lam |...BBPMedia1
Nathalie zal delen hoe DEI en ESG een fundamentele rol kunnen spelen in je merkstrategie en je de juiste aansluiting kan creëren met je doelgroep. Door middel van voorbeelden en simpele handvatten toont ze hoe dit in jouw organisatie toegepast kan worden.
SATTA MATKA SATTA FAST RESULT KALYAN TOP MATKA RESULT KALYAN SATTA MATKA FAST RESULT MILAN RATAN RAJDHANI MAIN BAZAR MATKA FAST TIPS RESULT MATKA CHART JODI CHART PANEL CHART FREE FIX GAME SATTAMATKA ! MATKA MOBI SATTA 143 spboss.in TOP NO1 RESULT FULL RATE MATKA ONLINE GAME PLAY BY APP SPBOSS
Brian Fitzsimmons on the Business Strategy and Content Flywheel of Barstool S...Neil Horowitz
On episode 272 of the Digital and Social Media Sports Podcast, Neil chatted with Brian Fitzsimmons, Director of Licensing and Business Development for Barstool Sports.
What follows is a collection of snippets from the podcast. To hear the full interview and more, check out the podcast on all podcast platforms and at www.dsmsports.net
Call8328958814 satta matka Kalyan result satta guessing➑➌➋➑➒➎➑➑➊➍
Satta Matka Kalyan Main Mumbai Fastest Results
Satta Matka ❋ Sattamatka ❋ New Mumbai Ratan Satta Matka ❋ Fast Matka ❋ Milan Market ❋ Kalyan Matka Results ❋ Satta Game ❋ Matka Game ❋ Satta Matka ❋ Kalyan Satta Matka ❋ Mumbai Main ❋ Online Matka Results ❋ Satta Matka Tips ❋ Milan Chart ❋ Satta Matka Boss❋ New Star Day ❋ Satta King ❋ Live Satta Matka Results ❋ Satta Matka Company ❋ Indian Matka ❋ Satta Matka 143❋ Kalyan Night Matka..
Cover Story - China's Investment Leader - Dr. Alyce SUmsthrill
In World Expo 2010 Shanghai – the most visited Expo in the World History
https://www.britannica.com/event/Expo-Shanghai-2010
China’s official organizer of the Expo, CCPIT (China Council for the Promotion of International Trade https://en.ccpit.org/) has chosen Dr. Alyce Su as the Cover Person with Cover Story, in the Expo’s official magazine distributed throughout the Expo, showcasing China’s New Generation of Leaders to the World.
Unveiling the Dynamic Personalities, Key Dates, and Horoscope Insights: Gemin...my Pandit
Explore the fascinating world of the Gemini Zodiac Sign. Discover the unique personality traits, key dates, and horoscope insights of Gemini individuals. Learn how their sociable, communicative nature and boundless curiosity make them the dynamic explorers of the zodiac. Dive into the duality of the Gemini sign and understand their intellectual and adventurous spirit.
Zodiac Signs and Food Preferences_ What Your Sign Says About Your Tastemy Pandit
Know what your zodiac sign says about your taste in food! Explore how the 12 zodiac signs influence your culinary preferences with insights from MyPandit. Dive into astrology and flavors!
IMPACT Silver is a pure silver zinc producer with over $260 million in revenue since 2008 and a large 100% owned 210km Mexico land package - 2024 catalysts includes new 14% grade zinc Plomosas mine and 20,000m of fully funded exploration drilling.
Best Competitive Marble Pricing in Dubai - ☎ 9928909666Stone Art Hub
Stone Art Hub offers the best competitive Marble Pricing in Dubai, ensuring affordability without compromising quality. With a wide range of exquisite marble options to choose from, you can enhance your spaces with elegance and sophistication. For inquiries or orders, contact us at ☎ 9928909666. Experience luxury at unbeatable prices.
Industrial Tech SW: Category Renewal and CreationChristian Dahlen
Every industrial revolution has created a new set of categories and a new set of players.
Multiple new technologies have emerged, but Samsara and C3.ai are only two companies which have gone public so far.
Manufacturing startups constitute the largest pipeline share of unicorns and IPO candidates in the SF Bay Area, and software startups dominate in Germany.
Board of pyschologsist second kabacoff complaint november 4 2010 (1)
1. November 4, 2010
Dear Board of Psychologists;
This is my second request for an investigation into Carol Lynn Kabacoff's practice. The attached
emails from Michael Waxman demonstrate that Carol Kabacoff continues to grossly misuse her
professional license. Her willingness to testify for Mr. Waxman in the Bar's suit for his conduct
against me and my daughter should be concerning.
As I have explained to the Board, Carol Kabacoff never diagnosed me with anything. Her
original report, submitted to the court in 2008, finds no diagnosis. Months later, in court, she
suddenly claims I have a narcissistic personality disorder. Based on her false testimony the court
ordered me to a course of DBT therapy from which I was dismissed in 6 sessions.
That should have been the end of Carol Kabacoff's involvement. Yet, Carol Kabacoff persists.
Over a year after seeing me for only two hours and reporting no diagnosis, she conducts a private
deposition, only Michael Waxman present, where she now declares I am severely mental ill and
my daughter should be taken from me. Michael Waxman, as the Board knows, vowed in writing
to use his vast family fortune to take my daughter from me. Mr. Waxman has vowed under oath
to "stop at nothing" and Mr. Waxman, in his own words, is "nurturing a bond [with my] beautiful
daughter." My daughter is three years old. Mr. Waxman is taking her on overnights to his
home. By all appearances, Carol Kabacoff seems to be a bought and paid for political weapon
for Mr. Waxman's agenda.
I have asked Maine's Attorney General to review the Board of Psychologists refusal to
investigate Kabacoff's conduct and have yet to receive a response. Subsequently, I have turned
my entire case over to US Attorney General Eric Holder as part of a national call for US AG
investigations into state-level oversight boards that are complicit with family court fraud.
Senator Collins' staff have also been very helpful.
It is my hope that Governor Elect LePage will take a much difference approach (than Governor
Baldacci) to fraud, corruption and neglect by Maine State oversight staff, who serve at his
pleasure, and whose salaries are paid by state tax payers. Therefore, I am copying his office on
this second request for an investigation into Carol Kabacoff's practice. Given that a child's life
and future is at stake, I ask the Board place an emergency hold on Carol Kabacoff's license to
practice until a full investigation is complete.
Sincerely,
Lori Handrahan, Ph.D.
Sorrento Maine 207-812-0191
CC: Governor Elect Paul LePage
Maine AG Janet Mills
US Senator Susan Collins
US AG Eric Holder
2. From: mjwaxy@aol.com
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 22:00:15 +0000
To: Jo Southard<josouthard@roadrunner.com>
ReplyTo: mjwaxy@aol.com
Subject: Re: Possible Story/Case/Injustice to report on
Grow a backbone, will ya? I thought some still cared about journalism. Disappointing.
From: "Jo Southard" <josouthard@roadrunner.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:55:43 -0400
To: 'Mjwaxy'<mjwaxy@aol.com>
Cc: Deborah Firestone<d.firestone1@myfairpoint.net>
Subject: RE: Possible Story/Case/Injustice to report on
Obviously I intended the message below for my editor, not you. We’ve decided not to cover the story.
From: Mjwaxy [mailto:mjwaxy@aol.com]
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 1:19 PM
To: df@mainelawyersreview.com; jos@mainelawyersreview.com
Subject: Possible Story/Case/Injustice to report on
Deborah and Jo Lynn:
This is a very interesting story/case I think. This is one of the many offshoots of Malenko v. Handrahan,
2009 ME 96. For reasons that are not clear to me, the Board of Overseers has decided to
prosecute/persecute me on Ms. Handrahan's behalf, even though she was found by the trial court and the
appeals court to suffer from mental illness, perceptual distortion, was not credible and was engaged in a
"sustained yet unjustified effort to have Mr. Malenko labeled as psychologically unfit." Malenko, par. 40.
Handrahan has filed in excess of 6 grievances against me, after filing and losing a Motion to Disqualify
Waxman, as well as a Protection from Harassment case against me (which took three full days to get
dismissed). She slandered the GAL, Liz Stout, who withdrew because of that. She filed a grievance
against Dr. Carol Lynn Kabacoff (dismissed) who testified at the divorce trial that Handrahan suffers from
mental illness, and she has published articles and written letters and emails slandering Judge Moskowitz,
DHHS, and the Maine Family Court. She also filed a PFA against Malenko, after her friend began a
DHHS investigation into Malenko, claiming disclosure that he was sexually abusing his daughter. DHHS
"unsubstantiated" this claim, and Handrahan immediately relocated with the child 4 hours north and filed a
bogus PFA in Ellsworth District Court, specifically to avoid Judge Moskowitz in Portland. That caused
another 2 months of separation between daughter and father, and she did not even bother showing up at
the final hearing. Judge Moskowitz dismissed the PFA.
Now, the Board has the unmitigated temerity to come after me, claiming that I have been "overzealous."
Keep in mind that when my representation began, Mr. Malenko has NO contact with his child, and now he
has her every single weekend, Thursday through Sunday or Friday through Sunday. The Board has
never bothered to even contact Mr. Malenko, or anyone who understands his perspective, to determine
whether I was acting as a zealous advocate under difficult circumstances, and has seen fit to claim that I
was "overzealous" and brands me as exhibiting conduct unworth of an attorney. The trial, before Judge
Alexander, is scheduled for November 18 and 19.
Last week, I entered my appearance as co-counsel with Peter Rodway. Yesterday the Board objected,
claiming that it would be a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct, pursuant to 3.7 for me to
occupy the roles of witness and lawyer. Attached is my response as well as the attachments to the letter.
I would LOVE you to run a story about this persecution!! This is no longer confidential, having been filed
in Court. How are the Board's actions consistent with its charge to protect the public from unethical
lawyering???
3. Feel free to call and discuss this with me anytime.
Michael J. Waxman, Esq.
One Monument Way, Ste. 206
P.O. Box 375
Portland, Maine 04112-0375
(207) 772-9558 phone
(207) 772-9567 fax
www.waxmanlaw.us
-----Original Message-----
From: Mjwaxy <mjwaxy@aol.com>
To: Aeee@mebaroverseers.org; jscottdavis@mebaroverseers.org
Cc: rodlaw@maine.rr.com
Sent: Fri, Oct 22, 2010 10:01 am
Subject: Response to Objection and Kabacoff issue
Attorneys Eee and Davis:
Attached is my Response to your Objection. I have not scanned in your exhibits, which I have
referenced. If you would like me to do that, please let me know and I shall honor your request.
Additionally, attorney Rodway's secretary indicated to me that attorney Eee left a message on Peter's
answering machine indicating that the Board objects to the admission of Dr. Kabacoff's deposition
testimony as "irrelevant." Allow me to explain the relevance in the hope that you may reconsider your
position. As I understand it, you claim that although attorneys are certainly expected to be zealous
advocates when necessary, that somehow I stepped over the ethical line by being too zealous. I think
you will claim that by saying things in emails and letters such as "Lori Handrahan is severely mentally ill"
you believe I crossed that line. Dr. Kabacoff's testimony at that deposition was that Handrahan is the
most severe Narcissistic Personality Disorder she has ever seen, and that such a person cannot possibly
coparent because she cannot even consider her child's needs above her own. My opinions of the
claimant were based on the conclusions of a mental health expert who met with and evaluated Ms.
Handrahan extensively. My opinions did not arise out of thin air. So . . . Kabacoff's deposition is
admissible because it goes to my state of mind and explains why I said what I said. It is absolutely
relevant. The more obvious objection would have been hearsay, but again, that fails because we are not
offering it for the truth of the matters asserted.
Should you require more explanation of this position, or of the legal concepts discussed, feel free to
contact me or attorney Rodway. I urge you to reconsider your objection.
Michael J. Waxman, Esq.
One Monument Way, Ste. 206
P.O. Box 375
Portland, Maine 04112-0375
(207) 772-9558 phone
(207) 772-9567 fax
www.waxmanlaw.us
![November 4, 2010
Dear Board of Psychologists;
This is my second request for an investigation into Carol Lynn Kabacoff's practice. The attached
emails from Michael Waxman demonstrate that Carol Kabacoff continues to grossly misuse her
professional license. Her willingness to testify for Mr. Waxman in the Bar's suit for his conduct
against me and my daughter should be concerning.
As I have explained to the Board, Carol Kabacoff never diagnosed me with anything. Her
original report, submitted to the court in 2008, finds no diagnosis. Months later, in court, she
suddenly claims I have a narcissistic personality disorder. Based on her false testimony the court
ordered me to a course of DBT therapy from which I was dismissed in 6 sessions.
That should have been the end of Carol Kabacoff's involvement. Yet, Carol Kabacoff persists.
Over a year after seeing me for only two hours and reporting no diagnosis, she conducts a private
deposition, only Michael Waxman present, where she now declares I am severely mental ill and
my daughter should be taken from me. Michael Waxman, as the Board knows, vowed in writing
to use his vast family fortune to take my daughter from me. Mr. Waxman has vowed under oath
to "stop at nothing" and Mr. Waxman, in his own words, is "nurturing a bond [with my] beautiful
daughter." My daughter is three years old. Mr. Waxman is taking her on overnights to his
home. By all appearances, Carol Kabacoff seems to be a bought and paid for political weapon
for Mr. Waxman's agenda.
I have asked Maine's Attorney General to review the Board of Psychologists refusal to
investigate Kabacoff's conduct and have yet to receive a response. Subsequently, I have turned
my entire case over to US Attorney General Eric Holder as part of a national call for US AG
investigations into state-level oversight boards that are complicit with family court fraud.
Senator Collins' staff have also been very helpful.
It is my hope that Governor Elect LePage will take a much difference approach (than Governor
Baldacci) to fraud, corruption and neglect by Maine State oversight staff, who serve at his
pleasure, and whose salaries are paid by state tax payers. Therefore, I am copying his office on
this second request for an investigation into Carol Kabacoff's practice. Given that a child's life
and future is at stake, I ask the Board place an emergency hold on Carol Kabacoff's license to
practice until a full investigation is complete.
Sincerely,
Lori Handrahan, Ph.D.
Sorrento Maine 207-812-0191
CC: Governor Elect Paul LePage
Maine AG Janet Mills
US Senator Susan Collins
US AG Eric Holder](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/boardofpyschologsistsecondkabacoffcomplaintnovember420101-120405074610-phpapp01/85/Board-of-pyschologsist-second-kabacoff-complaint-november-4-2010-1-1-320.jpg)
![From: mjwaxy@aol.com
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 22:00:15 +0000
To: Jo Southard<josouthard@roadrunner.com>
ReplyTo: mjwaxy@aol.com
Subject: Re: Possible Story/Case/Injustice to report on
Grow a backbone, will ya? I thought some still cared about journalism. Disappointing.
From: "Jo Southard" <josouthard@roadrunner.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:55:43 -0400
To: 'Mjwaxy'<mjwaxy@aol.com>
Cc: Deborah Firestone<d.firestone1@myfairpoint.net>
Subject: RE: Possible Story/Case/Injustice to report on
Obviously I intended the message below for my editor, not you. We’ve decided not to cover the story.
From: Mjwaxy [mailto:mjwaxy@aol.com]
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 1:19 PM
To: df@mainelawyersreview.com; jos@mainelawyersreview.com
Subject: Possible Story/Case/Injustice to report on
Deborah and Jo Lynn:
This is a very interesting story/case I think. This is one of the many offshoots of Malenko v. Handrahan,
2009 ME 96. For reasons that are not clear to me, the Board of Overseers has decided to
prosecute/persecute me on Ms. Handrahan's behalf, even though she was found by the trial court and the
appeals court to suffer from mental illness, perceptual distortion, was not credible and was engaged in a
"sustained yet unjustified effort to have Mr. Malenko labeled as psychologically unfit." Malenko, par. 40.
Handrahan has filed in excess of 6 grievances against me, after filing and losing a Motion to Disqualify
Waxman, as well as a Protection from Harassment case against me (which took three full days to get
dismissed). She slandered the GAL, Liz Stout, who withdrew because of that. She filed a grievance
against Dr. Carol Lynn Kabacoff (dismissed) who testified at the divorce trial that Handrahan suffers from
mental illness, and she has published articles and written letters and emails slandering Judge Moskowitz,
DHHS, and the Maine Family Court. She also filed a PFA against Malenko, after her friend began a
DHHS investigation into Malenko, claiming disclosure that he was sexually abusing his daughter. DHHS
"unsubstantiated" this claim, and Handrahan immediately relocated with the child 4 hours north and filed a
bogus PFA in Ellsworth District Court, specifically to avoid Judge Moskowitz in Portland. That caused
another 2 months of separation between daughter and father, and she did not even bother showing up at
the final hearing. Judge Moskowitz dismissed the PFA.
Now, the Board has the unmitigated temerity to come after me, claiming that I have been "overzealous."
Keep in mind that when my representation began, Mr. Malenko has NO contact with his child, and now he
has her every single weekend, Thursday through Sunday or Friday through Sunday. The Board has
never bothered to even contact Mr. Malenko, or anyone who understands his perspective, to determine
whether I was acting as a zealous advocate under difficult circumstances, and has seen fit to claim that I
was "overzealous" and brands me as exhibiting conduct unworth of an attorney. The trial, before Judge
Alexander, is scheduled for November 18 and 19.
Last week, I entered my appearance as co-counsel with Peter Rodway. Yesterday the Board objected,
claiming that it would be a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct, pursuant to 3.7 for me to
occupy the roles of witness and lawyer. Attached is my response as well as the attachments to the letter.
I would LOVE you to run a story about this persecution!! This is no longer confidential, having been filed
in Court. How are the Board's actions consistent with its charge to protect the public from unethical
lawyering???]()