Blackman presentation
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
0 likes•350 views
This document discusses cell phone privacy and the Fourth Amendment. It was written by Josh Blackman, a professor at South Texas College of Law, and provides his contact information including his website, Twitter handle, and email.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Cbl landmark cases
The document summarizes three Supreme Court cases that shaped civil rights in the US:
- Mapp v Ohio (1961) ruled evidence obtained without a search warrant is inadmissible, establishing the exclusionary rule and upholding 4th Amendment protections against unreasonable search and seizure.
- Marbury v Madison (1803) established judicial review, ruling that courts can strike down laws and executive actions that are unconstitutional.
- Roe v Wade (1973) established that the right to privacy protected a woman's choice to have an abortion based on the 14th Amendment's due process clause.
Tkam pp presentation final
A black child in the third grade had to walk 1 mile through a railroad yard to get to her school, even though there was a white school closer to her home. Her parents tried to enroll her in the closer, white school but were denied by the principal. They went to the NAACP to request an end to school segregation. In 1954, the Supreme Court ruled in Brown v. Board of Education that racial segregation in public schools was unconstitutional, combining five similar cases from Delaware, Washington D.C., Kansas, South Carolina, and Virginia that challenged segregation. While the text does not directly reference Brown v. Board, it indirectly relates through showing how segregation forced black children to go farther for school than
Bush vs gore
In the 2000 US presidential election, George W. Bush initially appeared to have won the state of Florida, but the margin was so close that a recount was ordered. Bush petitioned to stop the recount, arguing it violated equal protection. The US Supreme Court ruled in Bush's favor, stopping the recount and allowing Bush to claim the presidency. This demonstrated the Court's jurisdiction over state courts in electoral matters.
Mapp v ohio
Mapp v. Ohio was a Supreme Court case where Dollree Mapp was accused of possessing obscene materials by the state of Ohio. Police entered her home without a search warrant and found the materials. The Supreme Court ruled the evidence inadmissible, as the search violated Mapp's Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures. This established the exclusionary rule that evidence obtained in violation of constitutional rights could not be used in criminal prosecutions.
Mapp v. ohio
The police searched Mapp's home without a warrant and found pornographic materials. She was charged with possession of obscene materials. Mapp argued the evidence was obtained illegally without a warrant and should not be allowed in court. The Supreme Court ruled the 4th Amendment applies to states, so evidence from unreasonable searches cannot be used in court. This established the exclusionary rule under Mapp v. Ohio in 1961.
Mapp v ohio..
The document summarizes the Supreme Court case Mapp v. Ohio. Dollree Mapp was accused of possessing obscene materials in Ohio. The police entered her home without a search warrant and found the materials. Mapp argued her 4th Amendment rights were violated as the evidence was obtained illegally. The Supreme Court agreed, finding the evidence inadmissible due to the unconstitutional search and seizure.
Brief of Mapp v. Ohio (1961) (Case Study Sample)
This is a case study sample written by our writers. You can order a custom written case study like this on our website: http://www.essaytigers.com
Tkam pp presentation
A black third grade girl had to walk 1 mile through a railroad yard to get to her segregated school, even though there was a white school only 7 blocks from her home. When her parents tried to enroll her in the closer, white school, the principal refused because of her race. Her parents took their case to the NAACP and requested an end to school segregation, indirectly relating to the landmark Brown vs. Board of Education Supreme Court case that ruled racial segregation in public schools was unconstitutional.
Recommended
Cbl landmark cases
The document summarizes three Supreme Court cases that shaped civil rights in the US:
- Mapp v Ohio (1961) ruled evidence obtained without a search warrant is inadmissible, establishing the exclusionary rule and upholding 4th Amendment protections against unreasonable search and seizure.
- Marbury v Madison (1803) established judicial review, ruling that courts can strike down laws and executive actions that are unconstitutional.
- Roe v Wade (1973) established that the right to privacy protected a woman's choice to have an abortion based on the 14th Amendment's due process clause.
Tkam pp presentation final
A black child in the third grade had to walk 1 mile through a railroad yard to get to her school, even though there was a white school closer to her home. Her parents tried to enroll her in the closer, white school but were denied by the principal. They went to the NAACP to request an end to school segregation. In 1954, the Supreme Court ruled in Brown v. Board of Education that racial segregation in public schools was unconstitutional, combining five similar cases from Delaware, Washington D.C., Kansas, South Carolina, and Virginia that challenged segregation. While the text does not directly reference Brown v. Board, it indirectly relates through showing how segregation forced black children to go farther for school than
Bush vs gore
In the 2000 US presidential election, George W. Bush initially appeared to have won the state of Florida, but the margin was so close that a recount was ordered. Bush petitioned to stop the recount, arguing it violated equal protection. The US Supreme Court ruled in Bush's favor, stopping the recount and allowing Bush to claim the presidency. This demonstrated the Court's jurisdiction over state courts in electoral matters.
Mapp v ohio
Mapp v. Ohio was a Supreme Court case where Dollree Mapp was accused of possessing obscene materials by the state of Ohio. Police entered her home without a search warrant and found the materials. The Supreme Court ruled the evidence inadmissible, as the search violated Mapp's Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures. This established the exclusionary rule that evidence obtained in violation of constitutional rights could not be used in criminal prosecutions.
Mapp v. ohio
The police searched Mapp's home without a warrant and found pornographic materials. She was charged with possession of obscene materials. Mapp argued the evidence was obtained illegally without a warrant and should not be allowed in court. The Supreme Court ruled the 4th Amendment applies to states, so evidence from unreasonable searches cannot be used in court. This established the exclusionary rule under Mapp v. Ohio in 1961.
Mapp v ohio..
The document summarizes the Supreme Court case Mapp v. Ohio. Dollree Mapp was accused of possessing obscene materials in Ohio. The police entered her home without a search warrant and found the materials. Mapp argued her 4th Amendment rights were violated as the evidence was obtained illegally. The Supreme Court agreed, finding the evidence inadmissible due to the unconstitutional search and seizure.
Brief of Mapp v. Ohio (1961) (Case Study Sample)
This is a case study sample written by our writers. You can order a custom written case study like this on our website: http://www.essaytigers.com
Tkam pp presentation
A black third grade girl had to walk 1 mile through a railroad yard to get to her segregated school, even though there was a white school only 7 blocks from her home. When her parents tried to enroll her in the closer, white school, the principal refused because of her race. Her parents took their case to the NAACP and requested an end to school segregation, indirectly relating to the landmark Brown vs. Board of Education Supreme Court case that ruled racial segregation in public schools was unconstitutional.
Tkam pp presentation final
A black third grade girl had to walk 1 mile through a railroad yard to get to her segregated school, even though there was a white school only 7 blocks from her home. When her parents tried to enroll her in the closer, white school, the principal refused because of her race. Her parents took their case to the NAACP and requested an end to school segregation, indirectly relating to the landmark Brown vs. Board of Education Supreme Court case that ruled racial segregation in public schools was unconstitutional.
Tkam pp presentation final
A black third grade girl had to walk 1 mile through a railroad yard to get to her segregated school, even though there was a white school only 7 blocks from her home. When her parents tried to enroll her in the closer, white school, the principal refused because of her race. In response, the parents went to the NAACP to request an end to school segregation, relating to the landmark Brown vs. Board of Education Supreme Court case that ruled racial segregation in public schools was unconstitutional.
Barack Obama's Win
Barack Obama made history by becoming the first African American president of the United States. He was born in 1961 and has a wife and two daughters. His election was important because it showed that Martin Luther King's vision of equal rights and treatment for black people had been achieved, continuing the work of civil rights leaders like Rosa Parks and Malcolm X who fought against segregation.
Mapp v. ohio
The Mapp v. Ohio Supreme Court case involved Dollree Mapp, whose home was searched without a warrant by police in Cleveland, Ohio. The police found obscene photos during the search and arrested Mapp. While Mapp was found guilty, she appealed the case to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court ruled the search was likely illegal and established that the 4th Amendment determines the legality of searches, setting the precedent that all evidence obtained without a proper warrant is inadmissible in court.
RESUME 2013
Wendy Wonnell is an attorney seeking an associate position with a family law firm. She is licensed to practice law in California, Ohio, and Washington D.C. Her experience includes working as a staff attorney at the Family Violence Law Center representing victims of domestic violence, and as an associate attorney at Morris, Polich & Purdy specializing in construction litigation and personal injury. She also has experience working for the Office of the Attorney General in Ohio and as a law clerk while attending law school.
Law Project
Mapp v. Ohio established that evidence obtained through an illegal search cannot be used in court. The police searched Dollree Mapp's home without a warrant and found pornographic materials. Although she was not hiding a bomber as suspected, she was charged with possession of obscene materials. The Supreme Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment applies to states, so evidence from an unreasonable search is inadmissible. This case extended Fourth Amendment protections against unlawful search and seizure to the state level.
Plessy vs ferguson
1) Homer Plessy, who was 1/8 black, was arrested for sitting in the white section of a train in Louisiana in violation of state law.
2) The case went to the Supreme Court where Plessy argued the Separate Car Act violated the 13th and 14th Amendments.
3) The Supreme Court upheld the ruling against Plessy, finding that the state could regulate transportation within its borders and that "separate but equal" did not violate the Constitution.
Plessy v ferguson presentation
1) Homer Plessy, a shoemaker who was classified as black under Louisiana law, boarded a whites-only railway car in protest of the state's segregation laws. He was then arrested for violating these laws.
2) Plessy's case, Plessy v Ferguson, reached the Supreme Court in 1896. The Court ruled that state racial segregation laws were constitutional under the equal protection clause as long as the facilities for blacks and whites were equal.
3) The ruling established the "separate but equal" doctrine and allowed racial segregation in public facilities to continue for over 50 years.
Illegitimacy
CHED Philippines SSE: TRENDS AND ISSUES IN SOCIAL STUDIES
Mid Term Period : The Timeline of Ancient Israel
Powerpoint Presentation Created by: Rodlin SD. Nobleza
Bill of rights supreme court cases slides for debates
1) The Cantwells, Jehovah's Witnesses proselytizing in Connecticut, were arrested for violating a permit requirement and inciting a breach of peace after playing an anti-Catholic message. The Supreme Court found these restrictions violated the Cantwells' free speech and religious rights.
2) A high school principal searched a student's purse and found drugs after she was accused of smoking in the bathroom. The Court found the search reasonable and did not violate the student's Fourth Amendment rights.
3) A man sentenced to life without parole for cocaine possession challenged his punishment as cruel and unusual, but the Court found the punishment was not unusual even if cruel.
Collage businesses law
This document summarizes four Supreme Court cases related to search and seizure and rights of the accused:
1) New Jersey v. T.L.O involved the search of a student by the principal which uncovered marijuana. The court found this violated the 4th Amendment.
2) Mapp v. Ohio involved evidence obtained during an unlawful search of a home without a warrant. The Supreme Court applied the exclusionary rule to the states, barring unlawfully obtained evidence.
3) Miranda v. Arizona involved a confession obtained without informing the suspect of his rights. The Supreme Court established warnings must be given to protect 5th and 6th Amendment rights.
4) The document reviews the key facts and
comm Moot Court Argument Thursday Feb 11
The Williams College political science department will host a moot court argument presided over by four federal circuit court judges. Students will argue the hypothetical case of whether sentencing juvenile offenders to life without parole for non-homicide crimes constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. This issue is currently awaiting a decision by the Supreme Court. The moot court will allow students to gain experience arguing a real issue before eminent judges and examine an important legal matter regarding juvenile sentencing.
Michael hicks, haley kornegay, victoria goff
Jane Roe, whose real name was Norma McCorvey, brought a federal case against Henry Wade, the district attorney of Dallas County, Texas, to challenge the legality of abortion. Roe argued she had a right to an abortion under her right to privacy. The Supreme Court ruled in 1973 that abortion was legal in the first trimester but could be regulated more heavily later in pregnancy. The ruling legalized abortion nationwide but remained controversial.
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
Incometax Compliance_PF_ ESI- June 2024
This document briefly explains the June compliance calendar 2024 with income tax returns, PF, ESI, and important due dates, forms to be filled out, periods, and who should file them?.
Business Laws Sunita saha
Business law for the students of undergraduate level. The presentation contains the summary of all the chapters under the syllabus of State University, Contract Act, Sale of Goods Act, Negotiable Instrument Act, Partnership Act, Limited Liability Act, Consumer Protection Act.
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
Pim Betist's presentation about generative AI in the legal sector at Lexpo.com '24
快速办理(SCU毕业证书)澳洲南十字星大学毕业证文凭证书一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(SCU毕业证书)澳洲南十字星大学毕业证文凭证书》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
一比一原版(Lincoln毕业证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证如何办理
Lincoln硕士毕业证成绩单【微信95270640】办理新西兰林肯大学毕业证原版一模一样、Lincoln毕业证制作【Q微信95270640】《新西兰林肯大学毕业证购买流程》《Lincoln成绩单制作》新西兰林肯大学毕业证书Lincoln毕业证文凭新西兰林肯大学
本科毕业证书,学历学位认证如何办理【留学国外学位学历认证、毕业证、成绩单、大学Offer、雅思托福代考、语言证书、学生卡、高仿教育部认证等一切高仿或者真实可查认证服务】代办国外（海外）英国、加拿大、美国、新西兰、澳大利亚、新西兰等国外各大学毕业证、文凭学历证书、成绩单、学历学位认证真实可查。
[留学文凭学历认证(留信认证使馆认证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证成绩单毕业证证书大学Offer请假条成绩单语言证书国际回国人员证明高仿教育部认证申请学校等一切高仿或者真实可查认证服务。
多年留学服务公司,拥有海外样板无数能完美1:1还原海外各国大学degreeDiplomaTranscripts等毕业材料。海外大学毕业材料都有哪些工艺呢？工艺难度主要由：烫金.钢印.底纹.水印.防伪光标.热敏防伪等等组成。而且我们每天都在更新海外文凭的样板以求所有同学都能享受到完美的品质服务。
国外毕业证学位证成绩单办理方法：
1客户提供办理新西兰林肯大学新西兰林肯大学毕业证学位证信息：姓名生日专业学位毕业时间等（如信息不确定可以咨询顾问：我们有专业老师帮你查询）；
2开始安排制作毕业证成绩单电子图；
3毕业证成绩单电子版做好以后发送给您确认；
4毕业证成绩单电子版您确认信息无误之后安排制作成品；
5成品做好拍照或者视频给您确认；
6快递给客户（国内顺丰国外DHLUPS等快读邮寄）
— — — — 我们是挂科和未毕业同学们的福音我们是实体公司精益求精的工艺！ — — — -
一真实留信认证的作用(私企外企荣誉的见证):
1：该专业认证可证明留学生真实留学身份同时对留学生所学专业等级给予评定。
2：国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书这个入网证书并且可以归档到地方。
3：凡是获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内将在公安部网内查询个人身份证信息后同步读取人才网入库信息。
4：个人职称评审加20分个人信誉贷款加10分。
5：在国家人才网主办的全国网络招聘大会中纳入资料供国家500强等高端企业选择人才。问山娃想买什么想吃什么山娃知道父亲赚钱很辛苦除了书籍和文具山娃啥也不要能牵着父亲的手满城闲逛他已心满意足了父亲连挑了三套童装叫山娃试穿山娃有点不想父亲说城里不比乡下要穿得漂漂亮亮爸怎么不穿得漂亮望着父亲山娃反问道父亲听了并不回答只是吃吃地笑山娃很精神越逛越起劲父亲却越逛越疲倦望着父亲呵欠连天的样子山娃也说困了累了回家吧小屋闷罐一般头顶上的三叶扇彻夜呜呜作响搅得满屋热气腾腾也搅得山娃心烦意乱父亲一的
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptx
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptxGodwin Emmanuel Oyedokun MBA MSc PhD FCA FCTI FCNA CFE FFAR
Receivership and liquidation Accounts
Being a Paper Presented at Business Recovery and Insolvency Practitioners Association of Nigeria (BRIPAN) on Friday, August 18, 2023.
It's the Law: Recent Court and Administrative Decisions of Interest
2024 Idaho Water Users Association, Sun Valley, Idaho - June 11, 2024. Presented by Payton Hampton and Garrett Kitamura
More Related Content
What's hot
Tkam pp presentation final
A black third grade girl had to walk 1 mile through a railroad yard to get to her segregated school, even though there was a white school only 7 blocks from her home. When her parents tried to enroll her in the closer, white school, the principal refused because of her race. Her parents took their case to the NAACP and requested an end to school segregation, indirectly relating to the landmark Brown vs. Board of Education Supreme Court case that ruled racial segregation in public schools was unconstitutional.
Tkam pp presentation final
A black third grade girl had to walk 1 mile through a railroad yard to get to her segregated school, even though there was a white school only 7 blocks from her home. When her parents tried to enroll her in the closer, white school, the principal refused because of her race. In response, the parents went to the NAACP to request an end to school segregation, relating to the landmark Brown vs. Board of Education Supreme Court case that ruled racial segregation in public schools was unconstitutional.
Barack Obama's Win
Barack Obama made history by becoming the first African American president of the United States. He was born in 1961 and has a wife and two daughters. His election was important because it showed that Martin Luther King's vision of equal rights and treatment for black people had been achieved, continuing the work of civil rights leaders like Rosa Parks and Malcolm X who fought against segregation.
Mapp v. ohio
The Mapp v. Ohio Supreme Court case involved Dollree Mapp, whose home was searched without a warrant by police in Cleveland, Ohio. The police found obscene photos during the search and arrested Mapp. While Mapp was found guilty, she appealed the case to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court ruled the search was likely illegal and established that the 4th Amendment determines the legality of searches, setting the precedent that all evidence obtained without a proper warrant is inadmissible in court.
RESUME 2013
Wendy Wonnell is an attorney seeking an associate position with a family law firm. She is licensed to practice law in California, Ohio, and Washington D.C. Her experience includes working as a staff attorney at the Family Violence Law Center representing victims of domestic violence, and as an associate attorney at Morris, Polich & Purdy specializing in construction litigation and personal injury. She also has experience working for the Office of the Attorney General in Ohio and as a law clerk while attending law school.
Law Project
Mapp v. Ohio established that evidence obtained through an illegal search cannot be used in court. The police searched Dollree Mapp's home without a warrant and found pornographic materials. Although she was not hiding a bomber as suspected, she was charged with possession of obscene materials. The Supreme Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment applies to states, so evidence from an unreasonable search is inadmissible. This case extended Fourth Amendment protections against unlawful search and seizure to the state level.
Plessy vs ferguson
1) Homer Plessy, who was 1/8 black, was arrested for sitting in the white section of a train in Louisiana in violation of state law.
2) The case went to the Supreme Court where Plessy argued the Separate Car Act violated the 13th and 14th Amendments.
3) The Supreme Court upheld the ruling against Plessy, finding that the state could regulate transportation within its borders and that "separate but equal" did not violate the Constitution.
Plessy v ferguson presentation
1) Homer Plessy, a shoemaker who was classified as black under Louisiana law, boarded a whites-only railway car in protest of the state's segregation laws. He was then arrested for violating these laws.
2) Plessy's case, Plessy v Ferguson, reached the Supreme Court in 1896. The Court ruled that state racial segregation laws were constitutional under the equal protection clause as long as the facilities for blacks and whites were equal.
3) The ruling established the "separate but equal" doctrine and allowed racial segregation in public facilities to continue for over 50 years.
Illegitimacy
CHED Philippines SSE: TRENDS AND ISSUES IN SOCIAL STUDIES
Mid Term Period : The Timeline of Ancient Israel
Powerpoint Presentation Created by: Rodlin SD. Nobleza
Bill of rights supreme court cases slides for debates
1) The Cantwells, Jehovah's Witnesses proselytizing in Connecticut, were arrested for violating a permit requirement and inciting a breach of peace after playing an anti-Catholic message. The Supreme Court found these restrictions violated the Cantwells' free speech and religious rights.
2) A high school principal searched a student's purse and found drugs after she was accused of smoking in the bathroom. The Court found the search reasonable and did not violate the student's Fourth Amendment rights.
3) A man sentenced to life without parole for cocaine possession challenged his punishment as cruel and unusual, but the Court found the punishment was not unusual even if cruel.
Collage businesses law
This document summarizes four Supreme Court cases related to search and seizure and rights of the accused:
1) New Jersey v. T.L.O involved the search of a student by the principal which uncovered marijuana. The court found this violated the 4th Amendment.
2) Mapp v. Ohio involved evidence obtained during an unlawful search of a home without a warrant. The Supreme Court applied the exclusionary rule to the states, barring unlawfully obtained evidence.
3) Miranda v. Arizona involved a confession obtained without informing the suspect of his rights. The Supreme Court established warnings must be given to protect 5th and 6th Amendment rights.
4) The document reviews the key facts and
comm Moot Court Argument Thursday Feb 11
The Williams College political science department will host a moot court argument presided over by four federal circuit court judges. Students will argue the hypothetical case of whether sentencing juvenile offenders to life without parole for non-homicide crimes constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. This issue is currently awaiting a decision by the Supreme Court. The moot court will allow students to gain experience arguing a real issue before eminent judges and examine an important legal matter regarding juvenile sentencing.
Michael hicks, haley kornegay, victoria goff
Jane Roe, whose real name was Norma McCorvey, brought a federal case against Henry Wade, the district attorney of Dallas County, Texas, to challenge the legality of abortion. Roe argued she had a right to an abortion under her right to privacy. The Supreme Court ruled in 1973 that abortion was legal in the first trimester but could be regulated more heavily later in pregnancy. The ruling legalized abortion nationwide but remained controversial.
What's hot (13)
Bill of rights supreme court cases slides for debates
Bill of rights supreme court cases slides for debates
Recently uploaded
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
Incometax Compliance_PF_ ESI- June 2024
This document briefly explains the June compliance calendar 2024 with income tax returns, PF, ESI, and important due dates, forms to be filled out, periods, and who should file them?.
Business Laws Sunita saha
Business law for the students of undergraduate level. The presentation contains the summary of all the chapters under the syllabus of State University, Contract Act, Sale of Goods Act, Negotiable Instrument Act, Partnership Act, Limited Liability Act, Consumer Protection Act.
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
Pim Betist's presentation about generative AI in the legal sector at Lexpo.com '24
快速办理(SCU毕业证书)澳洲南十字星大学毕业证文凭证书一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(SCU毕业证书)澳洲南十字星大学毕业证文凭证书》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
一比一原版(Lincoln毕业证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证如何办理
Lincoln硕士毕业证成绩单【微信95270640】办理新西兰林肯大学毕业证原版一模一样、Lincoln毕业证制作【Q微信95270640】《新西兰林肯大学毕业证购买流程》《Lincoln成绩单制作》新西兰林肯大学毕业证书Lincoln毕业证文凭新西兰林肯大学
本科毕业证书,学历学位认证如何办理【留学国外学位学历认证、毕业证、成绩单、大学Offer、雅思托福代考、语言证书、学生卡、高仿教育部认证等一切高仿或者真实可查认证服务】代办国外（海外）英国、加拿大、美国、新西兰、澳大利亚、新西兰等国外各大学毕业证、文凭学历证书、成绩单、学历学位认证真实可查。
[留学文凭学历认证(留信认证使馆认证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证成绩单毕业证证书大学Offer请假条成绩单语言证书国际回国人员证明高仿教育部认证申请学校等一切高仿或者真实可查认证服务。
多年留学服务公司,拥有海外样板无数能完美1:1还原海外各国大学degreeDiplomaTranscripts等毕业材料。海外大学毕业材料都有哪些工艺呢？工艺难度主要由：烫金.钢印.底纹.水印.防伪光标.热敏防伪等等组成。而且我们每天都在更新海外文凭的样板以求所有同学都能享受到完美的品质服务。
国外毕业证学位证成绩单办理方法：
1客户提供办理新西兰林肯大学新西兰林肯大学毕业证学位证信息：姓名生日专业学位毕业时间等（如信息不确定可以咨询顾问：我们有专业老师帮你查询）；
2开始安排制作毕业证成绩单电子图；
3毕业证成绩单电子版做好以后发送给您确认；
4毕业证成绩单电子版您确认信息无误之后安排制作成品；
5成品做好拍照或者视频给您确认；
6快递给客户（国内顺丰国外DHLUPS等快读邮寄）
— — — — 我们是挂科和未毕业同学们的福音我们是实体公司精益求精的工艺！ — — — -
一真实留信认证的作用(私企外企荣誉的见证):
1：该专业认证可证明留学生真实留学身份同时对留学生所学专业等级给予评定。
2：国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书这个入网证书并且可以归档到地方。
3：凡是获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内将在公安部网内查询个人身份证信息后同步读取人才网入库信息。
4：个人职称评审加20分个人信誉贷款加10分。
5：在国家人才网主办的全国网络招聘大会中纳入资料供国家500强等高端企业选择人才。问山娃想买什么想吃什么山娃知道父亲赚钱很辛苦除了书籍和文具山娃啥也不要能牵着父亲的手满城闲逛他已心满意足了父亲连挑了三套童装叫山娃试穿山娃有点不想父亲说城里不比乡下要穿得漂漂亮亮爸怎么不穿得漂亮望着父亲山娃反问道父亲听了并不回答只是吃吃地笑山娃很精神越逛越起劲父亲却越逛越疲倦望着父亲呵欠连天的样子山娃也说困了累了回家吧小屋闷罐一般头顶上的三叶扇彻夜呜呜作响搅得满屋热气腾腾也搅得山娃心烦意乱父亲一的
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptx
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptxGodwin Emmanuel Oyedokun MBA MSc PhD FCA FCTI FCNA CFE FFAR
Receivership and liquidation Accounts
Being a Paper Presented at Business Recovery and Insolvency Practitioners Association of Nigeria (BRIPAN) on Friday, August 18, 2023.
It's the Law: Recent Court and Administrative Decisions of Interest
2024 Idaho Water Users Association, Sun Valley, Idaho - June 11, 2024. Presented by Payton Hampton and Garrett Kitamura
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptx
Excited to share insights from my recent presentation on genocide! 💡 In light of ongoing debates, it's crucial to delve into the nuances of this grave crime.
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
Search Warrants for NH Law Enforcement Officers
Training aid for law enforcement officers related to search warrants, the requirements needed, drafting, and execution of the search warrant.
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
The legal profession, which has historically been male-dominated, has experienced a significant increase in the number of women entering the field over the past few decades. Despite this progress, women lawyers continue to encounter various challenges as they strive for top positions.
在线办理(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
Presentation (1).pptx Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional a...
Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional and judicial approach
San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflict at Sea
Presentation by Justin Ordoyo
University of the Philippines College of Law
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
Learn more on how to obtain the work permit for self-employed persons in Italy at https://immigration-italy.com/selfemployment-work-permit-in-italy/.
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdf
https://veteranlegal.in/defense-lawyer-in-india/ | Criminal defense Lawyer in India has always been a vital aspect of the country's legal system. As defenders of justice, criminal Defense Lawyer play a critical role in ensuring that individuals accused of crimes receive a fair trial and that their constitutional rights are protected. As India evolves socially, economically, and technologically, the role and future of criminal Defense Lawyer are also undergoing significant changes. This comprehensive blog explores the current landscape, challenges, technological advancements, and prospects for criminal Defense Lawyer in India.
Recently uploaded (20)
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
fnaf lore.pptx ...................................
fnaf lore.pptx ...................................
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptx
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptx
It's the Law: Recent Court and Administrative Decisions of Interest
It's the Law: Recent Court and Administrative Decisions of Interest
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
Presentation (1).pptx Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional a...
Presentation (1).pptx Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional a...
San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflict at Sea
San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflict at Sea
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdf
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdf
Blackman presentation
- 1. Cell Phone Privacy and the 4th Amendment Josh Blackman (South Texas College of Law) JoshBlackman.com @JoshMBlackman JoshBlackman@gmail.com
- 34. Cell Phone Privacy and the 4th Amendment Josh Blackman (South Texas College of Law) JoshBlackman.com @JoshMBlackman JoshBlackman@gmail.com
Editor's Notes
- Virginia Declaration of Rights – 1776 “That general warrants, whereby any officer or messenger may be commanded to search suspected places without evidence of a fact committed, or to seize any person or persons not named, or whose offense is not particularly described and supported by evidence, are grievous and oppressive and ought not to be granted.”
- Who does it apply to? Right of the people, not person. Significance? Focus on the government’s actions, rather than remedies of individ What does it apply to? Persons, houses, papers, and effects What is the government forbidden to do? Conduct unreasonable searches and seizures Are warrants required? No Searches just must be reasonable But if warrants are issued, what must they be based on? Probable cause And how must the warrants be crafted, if issued? Particularly describing the place or person or thing to be searched
- “The right of the people to be secure … against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause” Textualist interpretation Search must be reasonable warrant clause only applies when warrant sought Supreme Court Interpretation Search without warrant presumptively unreasonable Unless warrant exception met