1631513068626_44425_2021.pdf
•
0 likes•119 views
The petitioner claimed that their shanties had been demolished despite the court's previous orders. The DDA submitted that the jhuggi dwellers had returned to the site after being provided temporary arrangements elsewhere, and the jhuggies had since been demolished. The court ordered the petitioners to submit documents showing they had occupied the site since before 2015 to claim protection under relevant judgments, and directed that no action be taken against protected persons until the next hearing while the status quo is maintained.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
Recommended
Delhi hc bail apr 9 delhi riots
The court heard two bail applications together regarding the same FIR for offenses of murder and rioting. One eyewitness claimed to witness incidents in two different locations over 500 meters apart on the same day. The court directed the state to verify this, and the state reported the locations were actually 350 meters apart. While the veracity of allegations will be determined at trial, the court granted bail to the petitioners since one had been in custody for over a year and trial would take substantial time. Bail was granted on furnishing personal bonds of Rs. 20,000 with one surety each of the same amount.
1158_2022_1_11_40959_Order_13-Jan-2023.pdf
1. The contempt petition alleges that there has been no progress in the investigation of an FIR registered 5 months after a hate speech incident on December 19, 2021, despite 8 months having passed.
2. The Additional Solicitor General submits there is no contempt of the Supreme Court's directions.
3. The court directs the Investigating Officer to submit an affidavit within 2 weeks detailing the steps taken in the investigation since the December 2021 incident.
4. The contempt petition will be heard again on January 30, 2023.
Sc allahabad hc bail order may 25
The Supreme Court of India heard a petition challenging a High Court order granting anticipatory bail related to a Covid situation. The Supreme Court issued a notice to the respondent to appear in the first week of July. It also stayed the general observations and directions in the High Court order regarding bail and appointed a senior counsel as an amicus curiae to assist the Court.
Holi bench sc order
This document is the record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding a petition for special leave to appeal an order rejecting anticipatory bail. The petitioner is accused of offenses including rape and had applied for anticipatory bail which was rejected by the lower courts. The Supreme Court reviewed documents in the case including the FIR and complainant's statement. The Court found that the petitioner had made a prima facie case for anticipatory bail based on WhatsApp chats between the petitioner and complainant brought before the Court. The Court then directed that if the petitioner is arrested, he shall be released on a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 and must cooperate with the investigation.
21492202243336535order20-jul-2022-426739.pdf
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Mohammed Zubair regarding several FIRs registered against him in Uttar Pradesh. In its order, the Court granted Zubair interim bail in six FIRs, transferred the investigation of these FIRs from the UP Police to the Delhi Police, and disbanded the SIT investigating the cases. The Court also stated that any new FIRs regarding the same subject matter would also be investigated by the Delhi Police and covered by the interim bail. Zubair was ordered to be released from custody by 6 pm that day upon filing personal release bonds of Rs. 20,000 for each FIR.
State v tahir hussain, nov 10
The court heard a case regarding State vs. Tahir Hussain & Ors through video conferencing. Counsel for the respondents accepted notice and sought additional time to file a reply to the petition. The court granted the respondents three weeks to file a reply with an advance copy to the other side. The petitioner was given one week to file a rejoinder after receiving the reply. The case was renotified for December 15th. The trial was stayed by the court until further orders, but the Trial Court was allowed to decide any applications. The order was directed to be uploaded to the website immediately.
Pravat mohanty sc judgment
This document summarizes a Supreme Court of India case involving two appellants, Pravat Chandra Mohanty and Pratap Kumar Choudhury, who were convicted of assaulting and causing the death of Kasinath Naik. The Supreme Court heard arguments from counsel for the appellants, the state of Odisha, and the legal representatives of the deceased. The appellants deposited compensation in court and all parties agreed to compound the offense of conviction under Section 324 IPC. The Supreme Court considered converting the Section 324 conviction to Section 323 or substituting imprisonment with a fine, given the appellants' advanced age.
S bagh review plea order
The Supreme Court of India dismissed a review petition seeking reconsideration of an earlier order regarding the right to protest. In a 3-judge bench order:
1. The Court allowed the application for permission to file a review petition but rejected the request for an oral hearing.
2. After reviewing the petition and earlier case records, the Court was convinced there was no error in the previous order warranting reconsideration.
3. The Court affirmed that the Constitution allows for the right to protest but not at all times and places, and prolonged occupation of public areas affecting others' rights is not permitted.
Recommended
Delhi hc bail apr 9 delhi riots
The court heard two bail applications together regarding the same FIR for offenses of murder and rioting. One eyewitness claimed to witness incidents in two different locations over 500 meters apart on the same day. The court directed the state to verify this, and the state reported the locations were actually 350 meters apart. While the veracity of allegations will be determined at trial, the court granted bail to the petitioners since one had been in custody for over a year and trial would take substantial time. Bail was granted on furnishing personal bonds of Rs. 20,000 with one surety each of the same amount.
1158_2022_1_11_40959_Order_13-Jan-2023.pdf
1. The contempt petition alleges that there has been no progress in the investigation of an FIR registered 5 months after a hate speech incident on December 19, 2021, despite 8 months having passed.
2. The Additional Solicitor General submits there is no contempt of the Supreme Court's directions.
3. The court directs the Investigating Officer to submit an affidavit within 2 weeks detailing the steps taken in the investigation since the December 2021 incident.
4. The contempt petition will be heard again on January 30, 2023.
Sc allahabad hc bail order may 25
The Supreme Court of India heard a petition challenging a High Court order granting anticipatory bail related to a Covid situation. The Supreme Court issued a notice to the respondent to appear in the first week of July. It also stayed the general observations and directions in the High Court order regarding bail and appointed a senior counsel as an amicus curiae to assist the Court.
Holi bench sc order
This document is the record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding a petition for special leave to appeal an order rejecting anticipatory bail. The petitioner is accused of offenses including rape and had applied for anticipatory bail which was rejected by the lower courts. The Supreme Court reviewed documents in the case including the FIR and complainant's statement. The Court found that the petitioner had made a prima facie case for anticipatory bail based on WhatsApp chats between the petitioner and complainant brought before the Court. The Court then directed that if the petitioner is arrested, he shall be released on a personal bond of Rs. 10,000 and must cooperate with the investigation.
21492202243336535order20-jul-2022-426739.pdf
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Mohammed Zubair regarding several FIRs registered against him in Uttar Pradesh. In its order, the Court granted Zubair interim bail in six FIRs, transferred the investigation of these FIRs from the UP Police to the Delhi Police, and disbanded the SIT investigating the cases. The Court also stated that any new FIRs regarding the same subject matter would also be investigated by the Delhi Police and covered by the interim bail. Zubair was ordered to be released from custody by 6 pm that day upon filing personal release bonds of Rs. 20,000 for each FIR.
State v tahir hussain, nov 10
The court heard a case regarding State vs. Tahir Hussain & Ors through video conferencing. Counsel for the respondents accepted notice and sought additional time to file a reply to the petition. The court granted the respondents three weeks to file a reply with an advance copy to the other side. The petitioner was given one week to file a rejoinder after receiving the reply. The case was renotified for December 15th. The trial was stayed by the court until further orders, but the Trial Court was allowed to decide any applications. The order was directed to be uploaded to the website immediately.
Pravat mohanty sc judgment
This document summarizes a Supreme Court of India case involving two appellants, Pravat Chandra Mohanty and Pratap Kumar Choudhury, who were convicted of assaulting and causing the death of Kasinath Naik. The Supreme Court heard arguments from counsel for the appellants, the state of Odisha, and the legal representatives of the deceased. The appellants deposited compensation in court and all parties agreed to compound the offense of conviction under Section 324 IPC. The Supreme Court considered converting the Section 324 conviction to Section 323 or substituting imprisonment with a fine, given the appellants' advanced age.
S bagh review plea order
The Supreme Court of India dismissed a review petition seeking reconsideration of an earlier order regarding the right to protest. In a 3-judge bench order:
1. The Court allowed the application for permission to file a review petition but rejected the request for an oral hearing.
2. After reviewing the petition and earlier case records, the Court was convinced there was no error in the previous order warranting reconsideration.
3. The Court affirmed that the Constitution allows for the right to protest but not at all times and places, and prolonged occupation of public areas affecting others' rights is not permitted.
Siddique Kappan bail.pdf
The Supreme Court of India granted bail to Sidhique Kappan, who had been held in custody since October 2020 related to charges under the UAPA and IT Act. While the Court refrained from commenting on the investigation, it directed that Kappan be released on bail subject to conditions like residing in Delhi and reporting to police weekly. The Court also stipulated he attend trial proceedings and not contact anyone related to the case.
26252_2022_1_27_38090_Order_09-Sep-2022 (1).pdf
The Supreme Court of India granted bail to Sidhique Kappan, who had been held in custody since October 2020 related to charges under the UAPA and IT Act. While the Court refrained from commenting on the investigation, it directed that Kappan be released on bail subject to conditions like residing in Delhi and reporting to police, citing the lengthy custody undergone. The Court also stipulated conditions for Kappan's release on bail and participation in legal proceedings.
Punjab haryana hc sedition bail
The document summarizes two petitions filed by Dalbir seeking regular bail in two FIRs registered against him for speeches alleged to have objectionable content against the Chief Minister of Haryana. The court granted bail to Dalbir subject to furnishing a surety of Rs. 2 lakhs in each case, noting that freedom of speech is a fundamental right, the investigation in both cases is complete, and conclusion of trial will take time. However, the state can seek cancellation of bail if Dalbir is found to misuse the bail granted.
Umar Khalid RBR18102022CRLA1732022_143522.pdf
The document summarizes a court judgment regarding an appeal filed by Umar Khalid seeking bail in a case related to the 2020 Delhi riots. The trial court had previously rejected Khalid's bail application, finding the charges against him to be prima facie true. In this appeal judgment, the court discusses the background of the case, the charges against Khalid, arguments made by both sides, and inconsistencies claimed in witness statements by Khalid's lawyer. The court will consider whether the trial court order rejecting bail was correct or if bail should now be granted to Khalid.
Madras Hgh Court RSS rally order Nov 4.pdf
The document summarizes contempt petitions filed against respondents for disobeying a court order directing permission be granted for processions and public meetings. It discusses arguments from petitioners and respondents. The court found intelligence reports referenced old cases and was not sufficient grounds for rejection. However, 6 sensitive areas were recently impacted so permission was rightly rejected there for now. For other areas, the court found no reason to reject requests so contempt petitions will proceed. The court upheld the importance of freedom of speech and peaceful assembly in a democracy.
Delhi hc order-bail_delhi-riots (1)
The petitioner, Irshad Ahmed, filed a bail application in the Delhi High Court for offenses related to rioting and arson. The prosecution opposed bail, stating that the petitioner was present with 100 others on the terrace of an accused's house, throwing petrol bombs. A witness identified the petitioner. However, the court noted there was no electronic evidence implicating the petitioner and the witnesses did not report the incident on the date it occurred. While not commenting on the merits, the court granted bail to the petitioner on furnishing a bond and surety, and transferred the order to the trial court.
Delhi HC on installation of CCTV
The petitioner filed a petition seeking police protection and compliance with a previous court order from 2020. The respondents claim the petitioner and others were called to the police station after a verbal altercation to maintain peace. The court ordered the state to submit CCTV footage in compliance with Supreme Court directives and to explain why audio footage is not installed. The state must submit a status report and the response of the third respondent within two weeks. The matter was rescheduled for further hearing.
Embed-6 (1).pdfc p;p;kdk[odk[drskpokpopo
लाइव लॉ ने न्यायमूर्ति गवई के हवाले से यह भी कहा, “राज्य (मध्य प्रदेश) ऐसे मामले में एक अतिरिक्त महाधिवक्ता को पेश करने में क्यों दिलचस्पी ले रहा है?” वह भी कैविएट पर?! जाहिर है, यह उत्पीड़न का मामला लगता है! किसी को उसे (याचिकाकर्ता को) परेशान करने में दिलचस्पी है!
Delhi hc nov 12 bail to ddelhi riots accused order
1. The petitioner filed a petition seeking regular bail in a case where he was charged with offenses under Sections 147/148/149/436/380 IPC.
2. It was noted that the petitioner has weak eyesight (-3.75) and was not wearing glasses in the CCTV footage, unlike when he was arrested. Given his weak vision, it could not be believed that he would have clear vision at night without glasses.
3. Considering the facts and that the petitioner has been in judicial custody since April 11, 2020, the court granted the petitioner bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 15,000 with one surety of the same amount.
27345 2021 34_3_33174_order_07-feb-2022
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition and related interlocutory applications. The Court had previously passed an order on January 10th, 2022 protecting the applicant from harassment. However, that order was not formally served on the Superintendent of Police. As a result, a notice was issued to the applicant requiring his attendance. The Court clarified that the applicant remains protected by the previous order and no further steps shall be taken pursuant to the notice. The Court directed the State of Tripura to communicate copies of both the present and previous orders to the Superintendent of Police to ensure compliance and prevent harassment of the applicant. The interlocutory applications were disposed of.
Sc order nand kishore garg
This document is a record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding a petition for special leave to appeal. It identifies the case number, petitioner and respondent. It notes that the petition was called for hearing and lists the judges present. Lawyers representing both sides are named. The court orders the case to be listed for next week.
M faruqui sc order
The Supreme Court of India was hearing writ petitions and an SLP regarding the arrest of Munawar by the State of Madhya Pradesh. The Court noted that the procedure for arrest under Section 41 of the CrPC was not properly followed and the allegations in the FIR were vague. The Court issued a notice in both petitions, stayed the High Court's judgment, and granted the petitioner ad-interim bail on conditions set by the trial court.
Sc covid death
This document summarizes proceedings in the Supreme Court of India regarding two writ petitions filed seeking a direction to provide Rs. 4 lakh ex-gratia compensation to families of those who died from COVID-19. The petitioners argued this compensation is required under disaster relief funds. The government sought time to provide details on the relevant compensation scheme and guidelines. The court granted the government 10 days to file a counter affidavit and the petitioner 3 days to file a rejoinder, scheduling the next hearing for June 11.
22975202222438360order23-sep-2022-436477.pdf
The Supreme Court of India heard a special leave petition filed by Lal Bhanu against the Union of India regarding his exclusion from the National Register of Citizens (NRC) in Assam. The petitioner's entire family was included in the NRC in 2018 except for the petitioner. The Court issued a notice returnable in 3 weeks, granted liberty to serve the Central Agency, and listed the petition for further hearing on October 17, 2022. The Court also ordered that no steps shall be taken for the deportation of the petitioner till the next date of listing.
MP high court wp303302022finalorder29-dec-2022digi-451554.pdf
The petitioners filed a writ petition to quash a show cause notice issued by the respondent demanding demolition of the petitioner's construction alleged to have been built on government land. The court noted that the notice was served with little time for the petitioners to respond. The court directed the respondents to provide land demarcation documents to the petitioners within 3 days and for the petitioners to file a response within 10 days. The respondents are restrained from demolishing the construction until further orders and from taking coercive action against the petitioners for 7 days.
Sc order dated oct 28
The Supreme Court of India heard a Special Leave Petition filed by Sri Aurobindo College (Evening) against a judgment of the High Court of Delhi. After hearing arguments from both sides, the Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition, stating that it was not inclined to entertain it under Article 136 of the Constitution. The pending applications in the case were also disposed of with the dismissal of the Special Leave Petition.
Delhi hc order june 4 (1)
The court heard a case regarding members of the Dhobi Ghat Jhuggi Adhikar Manch union whose homes had been demolished by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA). While the parties reserved arguments on the rights to stay on the land, the main issue was the living conditions of the residents post-demolition, as they had no sanitation, water, or other amenities. The court ordered temporary rehabilitation arrangements by the Govt. of National Capital Territory of Delhi/Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board (DUSIB) and later reimbursement by the DDA if members were proven to have lived there prior to the 2006 cutoff date. The DDA was given time to submit relevant records to verify residence
Delhi hc order june 4
The court heard a case regarding members of the Dhobi Ghat Jhuggi Adhikar Manch union whose homes had been demolished by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA). While the parties reserved arguments on the rights to stay on the land, the main issue was the living conditions of the residents post-demolition, as they had no sanitation, water, or other amenities. The court ordered temporary rehabilitation arrangements by the Govt. of National Capital Territory of Delhi/Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board (DUSIB) and later reimbursement by the DDA if members were proven to have lived there prior to the 2006 cutoff date. The DDA was given time to submit relevant records to verify residence
Urgent whistleblower information 14.05.18
This document is an urgent whistleblower application filed in an Indian court. It seeks to bring important information on record related to the administration of justice in judicial institutions. It references several pending applications filed by the whistleblower dating back to 2011 that remain undecided. These applications contain evidence of criminal conspiracy and involvement of public servants and judicial officers that the whistleblower seeks to present. The document requests that if the whistleblower's locus standi (standing) is questioned, the pending probate case determining this issue must be decided first before the applications can be heard. It urges the court to decide the various pending applications in sequence to allow the whistleblower to present pre-charge evidence in the matter.
Urgent whistleblower information as filed 14.05.18
This document provides information about pending whistleblower applications in an ongoing judicial matter. It notes that the whistleblower/applicant has 10 pending applications in the case that have yet to be decided, dating back to 2011. These applications include requests for records, to add parties to the case, and to present evidence. The document calls for the applications to be decided in sequential order so that the whistleblower can properly present evidence in the matter involving alleged criminal conspiracy. It also discusses how a pending probate case could impact the whistleblower's ability to prosecute the case depending on the determination of his locus standi or legal standing.
快速办理(SCU毕业证书)澳洲南十字星大学毕业证文凭证书一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(SCU毕业证书)澳洲南十字星大学毕业证文凭证书》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
More Related Content
Similar to 1631513068626_44425_2021.pdf
Siddique Kappan bail.pdf
The Supreme Court of India granted bail to Sidhique Kappan, who had been held in custody since October 2020 related to charges under the UAPA and IT Act. While the Court refrained from commenting on the investigation, it directed that Kappan be released on bail subject to conditions like residing in Delhi and reporting to police weekly. The Court also stipulated he attend trial proceedings and not contact anyone related to the case.
26252_2022_1_27_38090_Order_09-Sep-2022 (1).pdf
The Supreme Court of India granted bail to Sidhique Kappan, who had been held in custody since October 2020 related to charges under the UAPA and IT Act. While the Court refrained from commenting on the investigation, it directed that Kappan be released on bail subject to conditions like residing in Delhi and reporting to police, citing the lengthy custody undergone. The Court also stipulated conditions for Kappan's release on bail and participation in legal proceedings.
Punjab haryana hc sedition bail
The document summarizes two petitions filed by Dalbir seeking regular bail in two FIRs registered against him for speeches alleged to have objectionable content against the Chief Minister of Haryana. The court granted bail to Dalbir subject to furnishing a surety of Rs. 2 lakhs in each case, noting that freedom of speech is a fundamental right, the investigation in both cases is complete, and conclusion of trial will take time. However, the state can seek cancellation of bail if Dalbir is found to misuse the bail granted.
Umar Khalid RBR18102022CRLA1732022_143522.pdf
The document summarizes a court judgment regarding an appeal filed by Umar Khalid seeking bail in a case related to the 2020 Delhi riots. The trial court had previously rejected Khalid's bail application, finding the charges against him to be prima facie true. In this appeal judgment, the court discusses the background of the case, the charges against Khalid, arguments made by both sides, and inconsistencies claimed in witness statements by Khalid's lawyer. The court will consider whether the trial court order rejecting bail was correct or if bail should now be granted to Khalid.
Madras Hgh Court RSS rally order Nov 4.pdf
The document summarizes contempt petitions filed against respondents for disobeying a court order directing permission be granted for processions and public meetings. It discusses arguments from petitioners and respondents. The court found intelligence reports referenced old cases and was not sufficient grounds for rejection. However, 6 sensitive areas were recently impacted so permission was rightly rejected there for now. For other areas, the court found no reason to reject requests so contempt petitions will proceed. The court upheld the importance of freedom of speech and peaceful assembly in a democracy.
Delhi hc order-bail_delhi-riots (1)
The petitioner, Irshad Ahmed, filed a bail application in the Delhi High Court for offenses related to rioting and arson. The prosecution opposed bail, stating that the petitioner was present with 100 others on the terrace of an accused's house, throwing petrol bombs. A witness identified the petitioner. However, the court noted there was no electronic evidence implicating the petitioner and the witnesses did not report the incident on the date it occurred. While not commenting on the merits, the court granted bail to the petitioner on furnishing a bond and surety, and transferred the order to the trial court.
Delhi HC on installation of CCTV
The petitioner filed a petition seeking police protection and compliance with a previous court order from 2020. The respondents claim the petitioner and others were called to the police station after a verbal altercation to maintain peace. The court ordered the state to submit CCTV footage in compliance with Supreme Court directives and to explain why audio footage is not installed. The state must submit a status report and the response of the third respondent within two weeks. The matter was rescheduled for further hearing.
Embed-6 (1).pdfc p;p;kdk[odk[drskpokpopo
लाइव लॉ ने न्यायमूर्ति गवई के हवाले से यह भी कहा, “राज्य (मध्य प्रदेश) ऐसे मामले में एक अतिरिक्त महाधिवक्ता को पेश करने में क्यों दिलचस्पी ले रहा है?” वह भी कैविएट पर?! जाहिर है, यह उत्पीड़न का मामला लगता है! किसी को उसे (याचिकाकर्ता को) परेशान करने में दिलचस्पी है!
Delhi hc nov 12 bail to ddelhi riots accused order
1. The petitioner filed a petition seeking regular bail in a case where he was charged with offenses under Sections 147/148/149/436/380 IPC.
2. It was noted that the petitioner has weak eyesight (-3.75) and was not wearing glasses in the CCTV footage, unlike when he was arrested. Given his weak vision, it could not be believed that he would have clear vision at night without glasses.
3. Considering the facts and that the petitioner has been in judicial custody since April 11, 2020, the court granted the petitioner bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 15,000 with one surety of the same amount.
27345 2021 34_3_33174_order_07-feb-2022
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition and related interlocutory applications. The Court had previously passed an order on January 10th, 2022 protecting the applicant from harassment. However, that order was not formally served on the Superintendent of Police. As a result, a notice was issued to the applicant requiring his attendance. The Court clarified that the applicant remains protected by the previous order and no further steps shall be taken pursuant to the notice. The Court directed the State of Tripura to communicate copies of both the present and previous orders to the Superintendent of Police to ensure compliance and prevent harassment of the applicant. The interlocutory applications were disposed of.
Sc order nand kishore garg
This document is a record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding a petition for special leave to appeal. It identifies the case number, petitioner and respondent. It notes that the petition was called for hearing and lists the judges present. Lawyers representing both sides are named. The court orders the case to be listed for next week.
M faruqui sc order
The Supreme Court of India was hearing writ petitions and an SLP regarding the arrest of Munawar by the State of Madhya Pradesh. The Court noted that the procedure for arrest under Section 41 of the CrPC was not properly followed and the allegations in the FIR were vague. The Court issued a notice in both petitions, stayed the High Court's judgment, and granted the petitioner ad-interim bail on conditions set by the trial court.
Sc covid death
This document summarizes proceedings in the Supreme Court of India regarding two writ petitions filed seeking a direction to provide Rs. 4 lakh ex-gratia compensation to families of those who died from COVID-19. The petitioners argued this compensation is required under disaster relief funds. The government sought time to provide details on the relevant compensation scheme and guidelines. The court granted the government 10 days to file a counter affidavit and the petitioner 3 days to file a rejoinder, scheduling the next hearing for June 11.
22975202222438360order23-sep-2022-436477.pdf
The Supreme Court of India heard a special leave petition filed by Lal Bhanu against the Union of India regarding his exclusion from the National Register of Citizens (NRC) in Assam. The petitioner's entire family was included in the NRC in 2018 except for the petitioner. The Court issued a notice returnable in 3 weeks, granted liberty to serve the Central Agency, and listed the petition for further hearing on October 17, 2022. The Court also ordered that no steps shall be taken for the deportation of the petitioner till the next date of listing.
MP high court wp303302022finalorder29-dec-2022digi-451554.pdf
The petitioners filed a writ petition to quash a show cause notice issued by the respondent demanding demolition of the petitioner's construction alleged to have been built on government land. The court noted that the notice was served with little time for the petitioners to respond. The court directed the respondents to provide land demarcation documents to the petitioners within 3 days and for the petitioners to file a response within 10 days. The respondents are restrained from demolishing the construction until further orders and from taking coercive action against the petitioners for 7 days.
Sc order dated oct 28
The Supreme Court of India heard a Special Leave Petition filed by Sri Aurobindo College (Evening) against a judgment of the High Court of Delhi. After hearing arguments from both sides, the Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition, stating that it was not inclined to entertain it under Article 136 of the Constitution. The pending applications in the case were also disposed of with the dismissal of the Special Leave Petition.
Delhi hc order june 4 (1)
The court heard a case regarding members of the Dhobi Ghat Jhuggi Adhikar Manch union whose homes had been demolished by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA). While the parties reserved arguments on the rights to stay on the land, the main issue was the living conditions of the residents post-demolition, as they had no sanitation, water, or other amenities. The court ordered temporary rehabilitation arrangements by the Govt. of National Capital Territory of Delhi/Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board (DUSIB) and later reimbursement by the DDA if members were proven to have lived there prior to the 2006 cutoff date. The DDA was given time to submit relevant records to verify residence
Delhi hc order june 4
The court heard a case regarding members of the Dhobi Ghat Jhuggi Adhikar Manch union whose homes had been demolished by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA). While the parties reserved arguments on the rights to stay on the land, the main issue was the living conditions of the residents post-demolition, as they had no sanitation, water, or other amenities. The court ordered temporary rehabilitation arrangements by the Govt. of National Capital Territory of Delhi/Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board (DUSIB) and later reimbursement by the DDA if members were proven to have lived there prior to the 2006 cutoff date. The DDA was given time to submit relevant records to verify residence
Urgent whistleblower information 14.05.18
This document is an urgent whistleblower application filed in an Indian court. It seeks to bring important information on record related to the administration of justice in judicial institutions. It references several pending applications filed by the whistleblower dating back to 2011 that remain undecided. These applications contain evidence of criminal conspiracy and involvement of public servants and judicial officers that the whistleblower seeks to present. The document requests that if the whistleblower's locus standi (standing) is questioned, the pending probate case determining this issue must be decided first before the applications can be heard. It urges the court to decide the various pending applications in sequence to allow the whistleblower to present pre-charge evidence in the matter.
Urgent whistleblower information as filed 14.05.18
This document provides information about pending whistleblower applications in an ongoing judicial matter. It notes that the whistleblower/applicant has 10 pending applications in the case that have yet to be decided, dating back to 2011. These applications include requests for records, to add parties to the case, and to present evidence. The document calls for the applications to be decided in sequential order so that the whistleblower can properly present evidence in the matter involving alleged criminal conspiracy. It also discusses how a pending probate case could impact the whistleblower's ability to prosecute the case depending on the determination of his locus standi or legal standing.
Similar to 1631513068626_44425_2021.pdf (20)
Delhi hc nov 12 bail to ddelhi riots accused order
Delhi hc nov 12 bail to ddelhi riots accused order
MP high court wp303302022finalorder29-dec-2022digi-451554.pdf
MP high court wp303302022finalorder29-dec-2022digi-451554.pdf
Urgent whistleblower information as filed 14.05.18
Urgent whistleblower information as filed 14.05.18
Recently uploaded
快速办理(SCU毕业证书)澳洲南十字星大学毕业证文凭证书一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(SCU毕业证书)澳洲南十字星大学毕业证文凭证书》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
一比一原版(Lincoln毕业证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证如何办理
Lincoln硕士毕业证成绩单【微信95270640】办理新西兰林肯大学毕业证原版一模一样、Lincoln毕业证制作【Q微信95270640】《新西兰林肯大学毕业证购买流程》《Lincoln成绩单制作》新西兰林肯大学毕业证书Lincoln毕业证文凭新西兰林肯大学
本科毕业证书,学历学位认证如何办理【留学国外学位学历认证、毕业证、成绩单、大学Offer、雅思托福代考、语言证书、学生卡、高仿教育部认证等一切高仿或者真实可查认证服务】代办国外（海外）英国、加拿大、美国、新西兰、澳大利亚、新西兰等国外各大学毕业证、文凭学历证书、成绩单、学历学位认证真实可查。
[留学文凭学历认证(留信认证使馆认证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证成绩单毕业证证书大学Offer请假条成绩单语言证书国际回国人员证明高仿教育部认证申请学校等一切高仿或者真实可查认证服务。
多年留学服务公司,拥有海外样板无数能完美1:1还原海外各国大学degreeDiplomaTranscripts等毕业材料。海外大学毕业材料都有哪些工艺呢？工艺难度主要由：烫金.钢印.底纹.水印.防伪光标.热敏防伪等等组成。而且我们每天都在更新海外文凭的样板以求所有同学都能享受到完美的品质服务。
国外毕业证学位证成绩单办理方法：
1客户提供办理新西兰林肯大学新西兰林肯大学毕业证学位证信息：姓名生日专业学位毕业时间等（如信息不确定可以咨询顾问：我们有专业老师帮你查询）；
2开始安排制作毕业证成绩单电子图；
3毕业证成绩单电子版做好以后发送给您确认；
4毕业证成绩单电子版您确认信息无误之后安排制作成品；
5成品做好拍照或者视频给您确认；
6快递给客户（国内顺丰国外DHLUPS等快读邮寄）
— — — — 我们是挂科和未毕业同学们的福音我们是实体公司精益求精的工艺！ — — — -
一真实留信认证的作用(私企外企荣誉的见证):
1：该专业认证可证明留学生真实留学身份同时对留学生所学专业等级给予评定。
2：国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书这个入网证书并且可以归档到地方。
3：凡是获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内将在公安部网内查询个人身份证信息后同步读取人才网入库信息。
4：个人职称评审加20分个人信誉贷款加10分。
5：在国家人才网主办的全国网络招聘大会中纳入资料供国家500强等高端企业选择人才。问山娃想买什么想吃什么山娃知道父亲赚钱很辛苦除了书籍和文具山娃啥也不要能牵着父亲的手满城闲逛他已心满意足了父亲连挑了三套童装叫山娃试穿山娃有点不想父亲说城里不比乡下要穿得漂漂亮亮爸怎么不穿得漂亮望着父亲山娃反问道父亲听了并不回答只是吃吃地笑山娃很精神越逛越起劲父亲却越逛越疲倦望着父亲呵欠连天的样子山娃也说困了累了回家吧小屋闷罐一般头顶上的三叶扇彻夜呜呜作响搅得满屋热气腾腾也搅得山娃心烦意乱父亲一的
It's the Law: Recent Court and Administrative Decisions of Interest
2024 Idaho Water Users Association, Sun Valley, Idaho - June 11, 2024. Presented by Payton Hampton and Garrett Kitamura
Incometax Compliance_PF_ ESI- June 2024
This document briefly explains the June compliance calendar 2024 with income tax returns, PF, ESI, and important due dates, forms to be filled out, periods, and who should file them?.
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
Learn more on how to obtain the work permit for self-employed persons in Italy at https://immigration-italy.com/selfemployment-work-permit-in-italy/.
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptx
Excited to share insights from my recent presentation on genocide! 💡 In light of ongoing debates, it's crucial to delve into the nuances of this grave crime.
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
Business Laws Sunita saha
Business law for the students of undergraduate level. The presentation contains the summary of all the chapters under the syllabus of State University, Contract Act, Sale of Goods Act, Negotiable Instrument Act, Partnership Act, Limited Liability Act, Consumer Protection Act.
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...
This guide aims to provide information on how lawyers will be able to use the opportunities provided by AI tools and how such tools could help the business processes of small firms. Its objective is to provide lawyers with some background to understand what they can and cannot realistically expect from these products. This guide aims to give a reference point for small law practices in the EU
against which they can evaluate those classes of AI applications that are probably the most relevant for them.
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence Lawyers
Discover how Mississauga criminal defence lawyers defend clients facing weapon offence charges with expert legal guidance and courtroom representation.
To know more visit: https://www.saini-law.com/
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने यह भी माना था कि मजिस्ट्रेट का यह कर्तव्य है कि वह सुनिश्चित करे कि अधिकारी पीएमएलए के तहत निर्धारित प्रक्रिया के साथ-साथ संवैधानिक सुरक्षा उपायों का भी उचित रूप से पालन करें।
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
slide deck : Patenting innovations in 3D printing
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptx
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptxGodwin Emmanuel Oyedokun MBA MSc PhD FCA FCTI FCNA CFE FFAR
Receivership and liquidation Accounts
Being a Paper Presented at Business Recovery and Insolvency Practitioners Association of Nigeria (BRIPAN) on Friday, August 18, 2023.
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
Pim Betist's presentation about generative AI in the legal sector at Lexpo.com '24
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdf
https://veteranlegal.in/defense-lawyer-in-india/ | Criminal defense Lawyer in India has always been a vital aspect of the country's legal system. As defenders of justice, criminal Defense Lawyer play a critical role in ensuring that individuals accused of crimes receive a fair trial and that their constitutional rights are protected. As India evolves socially, economically, and technologically, the role and future of criminal Defense Lawyer are also undergoing significant changes. This comprehensive blog explores the current landscape, challenges, technological advancements, and prospects for criminal Defense Lawyer in India.
Recently uploaded (20)
It's the Law: Recent Court and Administrative Decisions of Interest
It's the Law: Recent Court and Administrative Decisions of Interest
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence Lawyers
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence Lawyers
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptx
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptx
fnaf lore.pptx ...................................
fnaf lore.pptx ...................................
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdf
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdf
1631513068626_44425_2021.pdf
- 1. $~26(1) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5822/2021, CM APPL. 18254/2021, CM APPL. 30553/2021 & CM APPL. 30649/2021 DHOBHI GHAT JHUGGI ADHIKAR MANCH ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Kawalpreet Kaur and Mr. Haider Ali, Advocates. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, SC for DDA/R-1. Mr. Parvinder Chauhan and Nitin Jain Advocates for DUSIB/R-2. Mr. Rizwan, Advocate for GNCTD/R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI O R D E R % 09.09.2021 The hearing was conducted through video conferencing. 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioners shanties have been demolished and they have been removed from their residences this court’s orders passed last June. 2. The learned Standing Counsel for DDA submits that temporary arrangements has been provided by and at the cost of DUSIB but the jhuggi-dwellers had returned to the site, from where -- in the interim, the jhuggies been demolished by DDA. She further submits that the petitioners have not been able to show any documents that they have Digitally signed By:KAMLESH KUMAR Signing Date:13.09.2021 11:47:14 Signature Not Verified
- 2. been occupying the said site since 1999 or otherwise before 2015. She says that latter date is important for them to avail the benefit under the judgment in Ajay Maken and Ors. Vs. Union Of India 260(2019) DLT 581 and Ors. and Sudama Singh & Ors. vs Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr. (2010) 168 DLT 218(DB). 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners have been residing at the site for years and have documents, which grants them protection in terms of the aforesaid judgments. 4. Let them file a site plan along with documents in support of their claims. Copies of the same shall be furnished to DUSIB and DDA within 10 working days. 5. Till the next date of hearing, no precipitate action shall be taken against the persons who claim protection of the aforesaid judgments. 6. The learned Standing Counsel for DDA had filed satellite picture of the site concerned which is reproduced here under: Digitally signed By:KAMLESH KUMAR Signing Date:13.09.2021 11:47:14 Signature Not Verified
- 3. Digitally signed By:KAMLESH KUMAR Signing Date:13.09.2021 11:47:14 Signature Not Verified
- 4. 7. Let status-quo be maintained in terms of the said photographs. 8. List on 12.01.2022. 9. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. NAJMI WAZIRI, J SEPTEMBER 9, 2021 SS Digitally signed By:KAMLESH KUMAR Signing Date:13.09.2021 11:47:14 Signature Not Verified