Institution of Environmental Sciences
EIA Community Debate
Eleni Antoniades Snell
18 07 2022
From concept to concrete:
Bridging the gap between
EIA and Construction
Eleni Antoniades Snell
Vice Chair of the Institution of Environmental Sciences
Trustee and Board Member of the IES
Project Environmental Lead- Aviation and Infrastructure
Construction Environmental Management and Assessment
Started career coordinating transport related EIAs in 2002 (highways, roads, bridges,
airports, railways) then went on to being EIA project manager and reviewer
Started carrying out construction monitoring in early career and went on to be construction
environmental lead on site
Now- work mostly on Antarctic EIAs and environmental lead for aviation and infrastructure-
mostly in defence
email: e.antoniades@eaenvironmental.com
linkedin.com/in/eleniantoniadesenvironmental
Launched officially in June 2020
Fourth community debate:
1) Competency in EIA, June 2020
2) Net Zero by 2050 and EIA ,October 2020
3) EIA for Better Design, March 2021
EIA Working group established October 2021
Preparing paper
Workshop
Nicola Parker- IES Trustee and Board Member, DIO Senior Environmental
Planner
Tim Snell – Infrastructure Planning Lead
IES EIA Community Group
From concept to concrete: Bridging the gap between
EIAs and construction
Why is there a gap?
A) TIME
Typical timeline of infrastructure and development project…
varies hugely but can take a minimum of 12 months for a small
development project with planning permission
EIA Stage
and Planning
Process
Planning
Permission Tender Stage
Construction
Stage
EIA Stage and Planning Process
Maximum periods required by
regulations for the planning
process
21- 24 weeks= 6 months
•EIA Screening Opinion Request to Local Planning
Authority (LPA)
•EIA Screening Opinion from LPA
•3 week Period to provide Screening Opinion
•If Developer Disagrees with Screening Opinion Can
Request Opinion From Secretary of State (3 Week
Period)
Screening
Opinion
3- 6 weeks
•Baseline Data Gathering, Initial Surveys and
Identification of Key Constraints (Public
Consultation Optional)
•Preparation of Scoping Report by Developer
•Request of Scoping Opinion from LPA
•Request Additional Information/Opinion from
Statutory Consultees
•5 Week Period for LPA to Provide Scoping Opinion
Scoping
Opinion
5 weeks
•Additional Data Gathering, Detailed
Surveys, Assessment of Environmental
Impacts
•Preparation of EIA Report by Developer
•Submission of EIA Report and Planning
Application
•EIA Report Published and Distributed to
Stat. Consultees
•16 Week Period for LPA to provide
Determination
EIA Report
16 weeks
B) DIFFERENT REGULATORY FRAMEWORKS
The regulatory framework and guidance related to environment
and sustainability governing each stage is differs
EIA Stage
•Town and Country Planning
Regulations (EIA Regulations)
•EIA Directive
•Other environmental
regulations such as Net Zero,
Biodiversity Net Gain, Water
Framework Directive
•EIA Screening
•EIA Scoping
•Environmental Surveys and
Assessments
•EIA / Environmental
Statement Preparation
•Outline CEMP
Planning Stage
•Permitted Development Rights
•EIA Screening Opinion from Local
Planning Authority with
environmental requirements
•Planning permission with
conditions
•Development Consent Order
(DCO) with requirements
•Hybrid Bill/ Act with planning
permission and series of
conditions
Tender Stage
•Developer’s own
sustainability and
environmental policies
•UK Government
procurement
requirements
•National Net Zero
requirements
Construction
•Contractor’s own
Environmental
Management System
•e.g. ISO 14001:2015
•Contractors Energy
Management System
•e.g. ISO 5001
•Contractor’s own
sustainable
procurement policy
•Voluntary
assessments e.g.
BREEAM, CEEQUAL
•Additional
environmental
regulations for
construction e.g.
related to
emissions, PPC,
environmental
permits, waste
permits, consents
C) Different professionals at each stage
Even though Developer will be the same through out process, the
organisations involved at the EIA and the Construction stages will
differ
Most professionals work either in EIA or Construction
EIA Stage
• EIA Reviewer/Project Lead
• EIA Co-Ordinator
• Topic Specialists/Chapter Lead
• May or may not include early
contractor involvement
Construction stage
• Environmental
managers of
contractor or HSE
managers
• Environmental
monitoring and survey
specialists e.g.
contaminated land
specialists, air quality
monitoring, ecology
team, noise and
vibration specialist
Participant survey, all anonymous
• Do you work in EIA and/ or construction?
• a) I work only in EIAs and not construction
• b) I work only in the construction phase
• c) I work in both EIA and construction phase
• 2) If you work in EIA, which of the following is true:
• a) I don’t generally visit or work on construction sites, mostly office based
• b) I may have meetings but stay in the compound/office
• c) I do have a hands on role during construction
• 3) If you work mainly in construction, which of the following is true:
• a) I have been involved with EIA and/or the planning process
• b) No/ limited experience in EIA, focus on construction
C) Different professionals at each stage
We will break out into three groups with two themes: EIA or Construction… pick a side
• We will break out into three groups
• Group (1) and (2) mainly EIA and Planning Stage- Nicola and Tim
• Group (3) mainly construction phase -Eleni
• In groups, the task is to work out the environmental budget for the
construction stage
 Construction team: Aim to win the tender
• EIA team: Aim is to minimise potential impacts and get project through
planning
Results and Workshop
Workshop: the hypothetical project…development of an existing
military runway
The hypothetical project is an existing airfield with a single runway with a length of
2,800 meters :
 It has been used as a military runway since the 1940s
 Trees and vegetation will need to be cleared prior to construction
 The project will include demolition of existing runway, taxiways and apron
 The existing airfield operating surfaces (i.e. runway, taxiways, apron) will be
completely broken out, crushed, processed and recycled on site
 The project will involve excavation below ground for new drainage
Potential adverse environmental impacts from construction which
were identified during EIA
1. Ecology: There are potentially nesting birds present in the trees
Potential adverse environmental impacts from construction
which were identified during EIA
2.Contamination:
There is potential for contamination from hydrocarbons and PFAS
on site due to previous use of the runway.
There is no ground investigation or desk study available
Potential adverse environmental impacts from construction which
were identified during EIA
3. Air quality and dust: There will be dust arising due to demolition and crushing of
concrete on site
Potential adverse environmental impacts from construction which
were identified during EIA
4. Environmental management: The project will require a Construction
Environmental Management Plan (CEMP), Site Waste Management Plan (SWMP),
Materials Management Plan (MMP)
Potential adverse environmental impacts from construction which
were identified during EIA
1. Ecology: There are potentially nesting birds present in the trees
2. Contamination: There is potential for contamination on site due to previous
military use of the runway. There is no ground investigation or desk study available
3. Air quality and dust: There will be dust arising due to demolition and crushing of
concrete on site
4. Environmental management: The project will require a Construction
Environmental Management Plan (CEMP), Site Waste Management Plan (SWMP),
Materials Management Plan (MMP)
Construction period June 2021- May 2022 (12 months)
Construction value £15 million
A
Allowance for pre-clearance survey only- June 2021 £2,500.00
Allowance for monthly ecology surveys £30,000.00
Allowance for additional seasonal survey for ground nesting birds (May2022) £2,500.00
B
Phase 1 Desk Based review £8,000.00
Ground Investigation with soil sampling trial pits and groundwater sampling of boreholes £20,000.00
Monitoring of groundwater during construction £60,000.00
Allowance for groundwater remediation in case contamination is found £500,000.00
D
No dust monitoring £0.00
Would like to carry out one off dust monitoring for the record £2,000.00
Weekly dust monitoring during specific activitiies (five visits) £10,000.00
E
Project set up phase and preparation of reports only £20,000.00
Quraterly audits and site visit in addition to above £10,000.00
Environmental manager full time on site £115,000.00
Total Budget allowed £780,000.00
Step 1) Pick which of the following environmental surveys and investgiations you would like to allow for
during construction
Ecology: There are potentially nesting birds present in the trees. Trees and hedgerows present on site
Contamination: There is potential for contamination on site due to previous military use of the runway.
There is no ground investigation or desk study available
Air quality: dust monitoring
Dust emissions potentially from crushing and screening of concrete on site and demolition
Environmental Manager: Preparation of Construction Environmental Management Plan(CEMP), Site Waste
Construction environmental impacts which arose during construction but were not
identified in EIA Screening Report
• EIAs are focussed on the site based impacts of construction and less focussed
on the “transboundary impacts” of materials and energy
• Where are the materials and fuels coming from?
• Fuel use -of asphalt plant and concrete batching plant. EIAs do not include
this level of detail or focus on White Diesel
0.00
20,000.00
40,000.00
60,000.00
80,000.00
100,000.00
120,000.00
140,000.00
160,000.00
180,000.00
Gas Oil/Red Diesel (ltr) Site Plant/
Equipment
Heating oil (ltr) Asphalt Plant
White Diesel (ltr) Site Vehicles
Construction environmental impacts which arose during construction but were not
identified in EIA Screening Report
• Water use in concrete batching plant. For concrete production during a runway
refurbishment project, the concrete batching plant used 9,182,000 litres over
a one year period whilst site compound used 213,000 litres over the same
period
• Underestimate of energy requirements of construction with focus on the site
compound office rather than heavy plant and machinery, often require
generator use
• No assessment of lighting requirements during construction
• No previous ground investigation for contamination. Elevated levels of
contaminants in groundwater and groundwater required remediation on site,
as well as discharge consent
• Dewatering strategy- groundwater information was not obtained and there
was no identification of the dewatering strategy. Programme allowance for
discharge consent applications or at least potential options should be
identified
Construction environmental impacts which arose during
construction but were not identified in EIA Screening Report
• Materials Arising – quantity of excavated materials arising on site
was not assessed. Some time is required for either a waste
permit or for the preparation of a Materials Management Plan
under the Construction Code of Practice.
• For example, RAF Marham runway refurbishment re-used
320,000 tonnes of arising on site
• Environmental impact of importing materials- quantities of
concrete materials such as limestone may be imported from far.
At EIA stage rarely possible to know where materials will come
from and volume estimates are approximate.
• For example, for RAF Marham runway refurbishment used
241,147 tonnes of aggregates to the site for the on-site
production of concrete and asphalt.
Conclusion
• Early contractor involvement during EIA Stage
• Contractors could identify how practical the environmental
mitigation measures proposed are to implement
• Cost estimate of environmental mitigations should be included
• Tenders should explicitly list the environmental mitigation
measures to be priced, as well as permits
• Clients/ Developers would save costs if contamination
investigations are carried out as early on as possible in a project
• Develop any remediation strategies in advance
• Environmental professionals working in construction phase
should have a beginners course in EIA to understand regulatory
framework
• EIA professionals should have experience in the construction
phase and understand the construction process
• Work placement or work exchange between office and site
based work
Eleni Antoniades Snell
Get in touch if you work in EIA and would like to know more about
environmental impacts of construction or would like training in this area
email: e.antoniades@eaenvironmental.com
linkedin.com/in/eleniantoniadesenvironmental

Bridging the gap between EIA and construction.pptx

  • 1.
    Institution of EnvironmentalSciences EIA Community Debate Eleni Antoniades Snell 18 07 2022 From concept to concrete: Bridging the gap between EIA and Construction
  • 2.
    Eleni Antoniades Snell ViceChair of the Institution of Environmental Sciences Trustee and Board Member of the IES Project Environmental Lead- Aviation and Infrastructure Construction Environmental Management and Assessment Started career coordinating transport related EIAs in 2002 (highways, roads, bridges, airports, railways) then went on to being EIA project manager and reviewer Started carrying out construction monitoring in early career and went on to be construction environmental lead on site Now- work mostly on Antarctic EIAs and environmental lead for aviation and infrastructure- mostly in defence email: e.antoniades@eaenvironmental.com linkedin.com/in/eleniantoniadesenvironmental
  • 3.
    Launched officially inJune 2020 Fourth community debate: 1) Competency in EIA, June 2020 2) Net Zero by 2050 and EIA ,October 2020 3) EIA for Better Design, March 2021 EIA Working group established October 2021 Preparing paper Workshop Nicola Parker- IES Trustee and Board Member, DIO Senior Environmental Planner Tim Snell – Infrastructure Planning Lead IES EIA Community Group
  • 4.
    From concept toconcrete: Bridging the gap between EIAs and construction Why is there a gap?
  • 5.
    A) TIME Typical timelineof infrastructure and development project… varies hugely but can take a minimum of 12 months for a small development project with planning permission EIA Stage and Planning Process Planning Permission Tender Stage Construction Stage
  • 6.
    EIA Stage andPlanning Process Maximum periods required by regulations for the planning process 21- 24 weeks= 6 months •EIA Screening Opinion Request to Local Planning Authority (LPA) •EIA Screening Opinion from LPA •3 week Period to provide Screening Opinion •If Developer Disagrees with Screening Opinion Can Request Opinion From Secretary of State (3 Week Period) Screening Opinion 3- 6 weeks •Baseline Data Gathering, Initial Surveys and Identification of Key Constraints (Public Consultation Optional) •Preparation of Scoping Report by Developer •Request of Scoping Opinion from LPA •Request Additional Information/Opinion from Statutory Consultees •5 Week Period for LPA to Provide Scoping Opinion Scoping Opinion 5 weeks •Additional Data Gathering, Detailed Surveys, Assessment of Environmental Impacts •Preparation of EIA Report by Developer •Submission of EIA Report and Planning Application •EIA Report Published and Distributed to Stat. Consultees •16 Week Period for LPA to provide Determination EIA Report 16 weeks
  • 7.
    B) DIFFERENT REGULATORYFRAMEWORKS The regulatory framework and guidance related to environment and sustainability governing each stage is differs EIA Stage •Town and Country Planning Regulations (EIA Regulations) •EIA Directive •Other environmental regulations such as Net Zero, Biodiversity Net Gain, Water Framework Directive •EIA Screening •EIA Scoping •Environmental Surveys and Assessments •EIA / Environmental Statement Preparation •Outline CEMP Planning Stage •Permitted Development Rights •EIA Screening Opinion from Local Planning Authority with environmental requirements •Planning permission with conditions •Development Consent Order (DCO) with requirements •Hybrid Bill/ Act with planning permission and series of conditions Tender Stage •Developer’s own sustainability and environmental policies •UK Government procurement requirements •National Net Zero requirements Construction •Contractor’s own Environmental Management System •e.g. ISO 14001:2015 •Contractors Energy Management System •e.g. ISO 5001 •Contractor’s own sustainable procurement policy •Voluntary assessments e.g. BREEAM, CEEQUAL •Additional environmental regulations for construction e.g. related to emissions, PPC, environmental permits, waste permits, consents
  • 8.
    C) Different professionalsat each stage Even though Developer will be the same through out process, the organisations involved at the EIA and the Construction stages will differ Most professionals work either in EIA or Construction EIA Stage • EIA Reviewer/Project Lead • EIA Co-Ordinator • Topic Specialists/Chapter Lead • May or may not include early contractor involvement Construction stage • Environmental managers of contractor or HSE managers • Environmental monitoring and survey specialists e.g. contaminated land specialists, air quality monitoring, ecology team, noise and vibration specialist
  • 9.
    Participant survey, allanonymous • Do you work in EIA and/ or construction? • a) I work only in EIAs and not construction • b) I work only in the construction phase • c) I work in both EIA and construction phase • 2) If you work in EIA, which of the following is true: • a) I don’t generally visit or work on construction sites, mostly office based • b) I may have meetings but stay in the compound/office • c) I do have a hands on role during construction • 3) If you work mainly in construction, which of the following is true: • a) I have been involved with EIA and/or the planning process • b) No/ limited experience in EIA, focus on construction C) Different professionals at each stage
  • 10.
    We will breakout into three groups with two themes: EIA or Construction… pick a side • We will break out into three groups • Group (1) and (2) mainly EIA and Planning Stage- Nicola and Tim • Group (3) mainly construction phase -Eleni • In groups, the task is to work out the environmental budget for the construction stage  Construction team: Aim to win the tender • EIA team: Aim is to minimise potential impacts and get project through planning Results and Workshop
  • 11.
    Workshop: the hypotheticalproject…development of an existing military runway The hypothetical project is an existing airfield with a single runway with a length of 2,800 meters :  It has been used as a military runway since the 1940s  Trees and vegetation will need to be cleared prior to construction  The project will include demolition of existing runway, taxiways and apron  The existing airfield operating surfaces (i.e. runway, taxiways, apron) will be completely broken out, crushed, processed and recycled on site  The project will involve excavation below ground for new drainage
  • 13.
    Potential adverse environmentalimpacts from construction which were identified during EIA 1. Ecology: There are potentially nesting birds present in the trees
  • 14.
    Potential adverse environmentalimpacts from construction which were identified during EIA 2.Contamination: There is potential for contamination from hydrocarbons and PFAS on site due to previous use of the runway. There is no ground investigation or desk study available
  • 15.
    Potential adverse environmentalimpacts from construction which were identified during EIA 3. Air quality and dust: There will be dust arising due to demolition and crushing of concrete on site
  • 16.
    Potential adverse environmentalimpacts from construction which were identified during EIA 4. Environmental management: The project will require a Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP), Site Waste Management Plan (SWMP), Materials Management Plan (MMP)
  • 17.
    Potential adverse environmentalimpacts from construction which were identified during EIA 1. Ecology: There are potentially nesting birds present in the trees 2. Contamination: There is potential for contamination on site due to previous military use of the runway. There is no ground investigation or desk study available 3. Air quality and dust: There will be dust arising due to demolition and crushing of concrete on site 4. Environmental management: The project will require a Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP), Site Waste Management Plan (SWMP), Materials Management Plan (MMP)
  • 18.
    Construction period June2021- May 2022 (12 months) Construction value £15 million A Allowance for pre-clearance survey only- June 2021 £2,500.00 Allowance for monthly ecology surveys £30,000.00 Allowance for additional seasonal survey for ground nesting birds (May2022) £2,500.00 B Phase 1 Desk Based review £8,000.00 Ground Investigation with soil sampling trial pits and groundwater sampling of boreholes £20,000.00 Monitoring of groundwater during construction £60,000.00 Allowance for groundwater remediation in case contamination is found £500,000.00 D No dust monitoring £0.00 Would like to carry out one off dust monitoring for the record £2,000.00 Weekly dust monitoring during specific activitiies (five visits) £10,000.00 E Project set up phase and preparation of reports only £20,000.00 Quraterly audits and site visit in addition to above £10,000.00 Environmental manager full time on site £115,000.00 Total Budget allowed £780,000.00 Step 1) Pick which of the following environmental surveys and investgiations you would like to allow for during construction Ecology: There are potentially nesting birds present in the trees. Trees and hedgerows present on site Contamination: There is potential for contamination on site due to previous military use of the runway. There is no ground investigation or desk study available Air quality: dust monitoring Dust emissions potentially from crushing and screening of concrete on site and demolition Environmental Manager: Preparation of Construction Environmental Management Plan(CEMP), Site Waste
  • 19.
    Construction environmental impactswhich arose during construction but were not identified in EIA Screening Report • EIAs are focussed on the site based impacts of construction and less focussed on the “transboundary impacts” of materials and energy • Where are the materials and fuels coming from? • Fuel use -of asphalt plant and concrete batching plant. EIAs do not include this level of detail or focus on White Diesel 0.00 20,000.00 40,000.00 60,000.00 80,000.00 100,000.00 120,000.00 140,000.00 160,000.00 180,000.00 Gas Oil/Red Diesel (ltr) Site Plant/ Equipment Heating oil (ltr) Asphalt Plant White Diesel (ltr) Site Vehicles
  • 20.
    Construction environmental impactswhich arose during construction but were not identified in EIA Screening Report • Water use in concrete batching plant. For concrete production during a runway refurbishment project, the concrete batching plant used 9,182,000 litres over a one year period whilst site compound used 213,000 litres over the same period • Underestimate of energy requirements of construction with focus on the site compound office rather than heavy plant and machinery, often require generator use • No assessment of lighting requirements during construction • No previous ground investigation for contamination. Elevated levels of contaminants in groundwater and groundwater required remediation on site, as well as discharge consent • Dewatering strategy- groundwater information was not obtained and there was no identification of the dewatering strategy. Programme allowance for discharge consent applications or at least potential options should be identified
  • 21.
    Construction environmental impactswhich arose during construction but were not identified in EIA Screening Report • Materials Arising – quantity of excavated materials arising on site was not assessed. Some time is required for either a waste permit or for the preparation of a Materials Management Plan under the Construction Code of Practice. • For example, RAF Marham runway refurbishment re-used 320,000 tonnes of arising on site • Environmental impact of importing materials- quantities of concrete materials such as limestone may be imported from far. At EIA stage rarely possible to know where materials will come from and volume estimates are approximate. • For example, for RAF Marham runway refurbishment used 241,147 tonnes of aggregates to the site for the on-site production of concrete and asphalt.
  • 22.
    Conclusion • Early contractorinvolvement during EIA Stage • Contractors could identify how practical the environmental mitigation measures proposed are to implement • Cost estimate of environmental mitigations should be included • Tenders should explicitly list the environmental mitigation measures to be priced, as well as permits • Clients/ Developers would save costs if contamination investigations are carried out as early on as possible in a project • Develop any remediation strategies in advance • Environmental professionals working in construction phase should have a beginners course in EIA to understand regulatory framework • EIA professionals should have experience in the construction phase and understand the construction process • Work placement or work exchange between office and site based work
  • 23.
    Eleni Antoniades Snell Getin touch if you work in EIA and would like to know more about environmental impacts of construction or would like training in this area email: e.antoniades@eaenvironmental.com linkedin.com/in/eleniantoniadesenvironmental