Allbad hc habc(a) 745 2020
•
0 likes•277 views
The court heard a habeas corpus writ petition regarding a female corpus (Shikha) who was detained. School records showed the corpus's date of birth was 04.10.1999, making her a major under the Juvenile Justice Act. The corpus stated she wanted to live with her husband Salman. As she had attained the age of majority and expressed her choice, the court allowed her to live freely with her husband without restrictions. The FIR against Salman and orders handing the corpus to her parents against her will were quashed. Police were directed to ensure the couple's protection and safe passage as they return home.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
Recommended
Family law project
The Supreme Court case Gaurav Nagpal v. Sumedha Nagpal addressed custody of a child following divorce proceedings. The key issues were whether the welfare of the child is the paramount consideration in determining custody, and the father's rights to visitation. The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision granting custody to the mother, finding the child's welfare was best served by remaining with her. However, the Supreme Court modified the order to provide the father visitation rights twice monthly and longer periods during school holidays. The Court emphasized conciliation efforts should be made to prevent bitter legal fights over children.
Magistrate order
1. Rajkumar Narayan Tandel was accused of stalking and sexually harassing a woman in S.K. Patil Garden in Mumbai on September 18, 2021.
2. According to the prosecution, Tandel followed the woman in the garden and exposed his genitals to her. When the woman called for help, two witnesses helped restrain Tandel until the police arrived.
3. The court examined five prosecution witnesses, including the complainant, two eyewitnesses, and two police officers. Based on the evidence, the court found Tandel guilty of stalking, outraging the woman's modesty, and committing indecent exposure, and convicted him.
Sara austin par 289 case presentation
Defendant was charged with manslaughter, accessory to a crime, and reckless endangerment for his role as driver in a drive-by shooting. He appealed, arguing the trial court erred in admitting witness statements commenting on other witnesses' truthfulness and allowing the prosecutor to question him about his post-arrest silence. The appellate court found no error, as witnesses can comment on truthfulness to explain investigations, and the prosecutor's questions rebutted the defendant's claim that he told detectives everything.
Cmm order
This document is a court order from a case involving multiple accused persons. It summarizes proceedings from a hearing where the prosecution requested more time for further investigation into the case. The court allowed more time but imposed a cost of Rs. 25,000 to be split among the accused, noting delays in the investigation. It also ordered the Secretary of Home Affairs to inquire about responsibility for the costs being imposed and deducting the amount from the responsible officer's salary. The case was adjourned to a future date for further proceedings.
O Chandsaheb Shaikh On 9 December, 1991
This judgment summarizes a case in which the State of Maharashtra appealed an order acquitting a shopkeeper accused of selling adulterated cinnamon. The appellate court analyzed the evidence presented at trial, including testimony from food inspectors who purchased a sample from the shopkeeper and had it tested. The court found that the trial court erred in acquitting the shopkeeper and overturned the acquittal based on the evidence that the sample sold as cinnamon was found to contain no cinnamon.
Anticipatory bail order 13 aug-2021
This document provides details of 3 bail applications filed by individuals accused in a case registered by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) alleging offenses related to espionage against scientists at ISRO in 1994. The applications were filed by the 11th accused, the 1st and 2nd accused, and the 7th accused. The court heard arguments from lawyers representing the accused. The document discusses the background of the espionage case against ISRO scientists in 1994 and its investigation and closure. It also discusses the report submitted in 2021 by a committee headed by a former Supreme Court judge regarding the false implication of individuals in the case.
Umar khalid order
The document is an order from a court case involving the bail application of Umar Khalid regarding FIR No. 101/2020 filed at PS Khajuri Khas. The key points are:
1) Umar Khalid is accused of being involved in a larger conspiracy case related to the February 2020 Delhi riots based on his disclosure statement and meeting with accused Tahir Hussain and Khalid Saifi as identified by a witness.
2) The defense argued Umar Khalid was not physically present during the crime and deserves bail on the grounds of parity with other accused granted bail in the case.
3) The prosecution contends Umar Khalid was part of a larger conspiracy to incite
Posh order
This document outlines guidelines for protecting the identities and privacy of parties involved in a sexual harassment case. It summarizes:
- The identities of parties will be anonymized in orders and case files to protect privacy.
- Strict protocols are established for filing documents, accessing records, conducting hearings, and releasing information to ensure identities are not disclosed.
- Breach of these anonymity protocols will be considered contempt of court. Guidelines also apply to related proceedings in other courts.
Recommended
Family law project
The Supreme Court case Gaurav Nagpal v. Sumedha Nagpal addressed custody of a child following divorce proceedings. The key issues were whether the welfare of the child is the paramount consideration in determining custody, and the father's rights to visitation. The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision granting custody to the mother, finding the child's welfare was best served by remaining with her. However, the Supreme Court modified the order to provide the father visitation rights twice monthly and longer periods during school holidays. The Court emphasized conciliation efforts should be made to prevent bitter legal fights over children.
Magistrate order
1. Rajkumar Narayan Tandel was accused of stalking and sexually harassing a woman in S.K. Patil Garden in Mumbai on September 18, 2021.
2. According to the prosecution, Tandel followed the woman in the garden and exposed his genitals to her. When the woman called for help, two witnesses helped restrain Tandel until the police arrived.
3. The court examined five prosecution witnesses, including the complainant, two eyewitnesses, and two police officers. Based on the evidence, the court found Tandel guilty of stalking, outraging the woman's modesty, and committing indecent exposure, and convicted him.
Sara austin par 289 case presentation
Defendant was charged with manslaughter, accessory to a crime, and reckless endangerment for his role as driver in a drive-by shooting. He appealed, arguing the trial court erred in admitting witness statements commenting on other witnesses' truthfulness and allowing the prosecutor to question him about his post-arrest silence. The appellate court found no error, as witnesses can comment on truthfulness to explain investigations, and the prosecutor's questions rebutted the defendant's claim that he told detectives everything.
Cmm order
This document is a court order from a case involving multiple accused persons. It summarizes proceedings from a hearing where the prosecution requested more time for further investigation into the case. The court allowed more time but imposed a cost of Rs. 25,000 to be split among the accused, noting delays in the investigation. It also ordered the Secretary of Home Affairs to inquire about responsibility for the costs being imposed and deducting the amount from the responsible officer's salary. The case was adjourned to a future date for further proceedings.
O Chandsaheb Shaikh On 9 December, 1991
This judgment summarizes a case in which the State of Maharashtra appealed an order acquitting a shopkeeper accused of selling adulterated cinnamon. The appellate court analyzed the evidence presented at trial, including testimony from food inspectors who purchased a sample from the shopkeeper and had it tested. The court found that the trial court erred in acquitting the shopkeeper and overturned the acquittal based on the evidence that the sample sold as cinnamon was found to contain no cinnamon.
Anticipatory bail order 13 aug-2021
This document provides details of 3 bail applications filed by individuals accused in a case registered by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) alleging offenses related to espionage against scientists at ISRO in 1994. The applications were filed by the 11th accused, the 1st and 2nd accused, and the 7th accused. The court heard arguments from lawyers representing the accused. The document discusses the background of the espionage case against ISRO scientists in 1994 and its investigation and closure. It also discusses the report submitted in 2021 by a committee headed by a former Supreme Court judge regarding the false implication of individuals in the case.
Umar khalid order
The document is an order from a court case involving the bail application of Umar Khalid regarding FIR No. 101/2020 filed at PS Khajuri Khas. The key points are:
1) Umar Khalid is accused of being involved in a larger conspiracy case related to the February 2020 Delhi riots based on his disclosure statement and meeting with accused Tahir Hussain and Khalid Saifi as identified by a witness.
2) The defense argued Umar Khalid was not physically present during the crime and deserves bail on the grounds of parity with other accused granted bail in the case.
3) The prosecution contends Umar Khalid was part of a larger conspiracy to incite
Posh order
This document outlines guidelines for protecting the identities and privacy of parties involved in a sexual harassment case. It summarizes:
- The identities of parties will be anonymized in orders and case files to protect privacy.
- Strict protocols are established for filing documents, accessing records, conducting hearings, and releasing information to ensure identities are not disclosed.
- Breach of these anonymity protocols will be considered contempt of court. Guidelines also apply to related proceedings in other courts.
Jammu kashmir hc order
1) The court heard from petitioner 1, who submitted that she converted to Islam of her own free will and married petitioner 2 without force. She stated she faces threats to her life from respondents 6 and 7 due to her marriage.
2) Petitioner 1 provided documents showing she is of legal age to marry. She asked the court to protect her life and that of her husband based on constitutional guarantees.
3) The court directed respondents 1-5, including police, to ensure the petitioners' safety and are not harassed by respondents 6 and 7, and to allow them to live married without interference.
Allahabad High Court judgement parens patriae.pdf
This document summarizes a court case regarding custody of a minor child. The appellants are the biological parents of the child seeking custody, while the respondents are the maternal uncle and aunt currently having custody. The family court ruled against the parents on the issue of custody, finding it is in the best interest of the child to remain with the uncle and aunt based on the child's wishes. The parents have appealed this ruling. The key issues are whether the biological parents have a right to custody, and whether they are entitled to any other relief.
July delhi hc order
1. Gulfisha Fatima filed a writ petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus to direct the State to produce her and release her from what she claims is illegal custody.
2. She was arrested in connection with multiple FIRs including charges under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act. Her bail applications were dismissed except for one case where she was granted bail.
3. The court dismissed the writ petition stating that her detention was not illegal as she was in judicial custody pursuant to court orders and the remedy lies in appealing those orders, not through a writ of habeas corpus.
Preet singh and ors order
The document is a court order regarding an application for bail by Preet Singh, who has been accused of offenses under the IPC and Epidemic Diseases Act related to organizing a gathering without permission. The investigating officer opposed bail, citing video evidence of Singh's presence and the risk of further offenses. However, the court denied bail, noting that while the offenses are bailable, Singh's case differs from a previously bailed accused who was not seen inciting crowds in video clips as Singh was. The court found that further investigation was needed and denied bail at this stage.
Bom hc bail is recruit order
1. The appellant, Iqbal Ahmed Kabir Ahmed, who was the original accused No. 3, filed an application for bail which was rejected by the special judge. He has filed this appeal against the rejection.
2. The key evidence against the appellant includes the recovery of an oath from his house pursuant to disclosure by an co-accused, and pointing out an electric switchboard in his house where an IED was allegedly soldered. Statements of witnesses also indicate the appellant participated in meetings where actions regarding perceived threats to Islam were discussed.
3. The prosecution argues the material is sufficient to show a prima facie case against the appellant and reasonable grounds exist to believe the accusations, thereby invoking the
Allahabad hc bail(a) 16315 2021
This document is a court order summarizing a bail application hearing for a case involving charges of rape, fraud, criminal intimidation, and unlawful religious conversion. The applicant, Sonu Rajpoot, sought bail while awaiting trial. The court summarized the arguments of the applicant's lawyer, who argued that the victim was a consenting adult and the applicant was falsely accused due to a religious conversion dispute. The prosecution opposed bail. Considering the circumstances, lack of evidence tampering, and consent between the applicant and victim, the court granted bail to the applicant with conditions including not harassing the victim.
M p bangle seller bail
1) The applicant Golu @ Tasneem @ Taslim filed a bail application in the High Court of Madhya Pradesh seeking bail in connection with a crime registered under various sections of IPC and POCSO Act.
2) It was argued for the applicant that he is the first offender and has been in custody since August 23, 2021. His custodial interrogation is no longer required.
3) The prosecution opposed the bail plea submitting that various identity cards of different names were recovered from the applicant. The court examined the facts of the case and granted bail to the applicant with various conditions.
Gaurav nagpal v. sumedha nagpal
This case summary provides an overview of the key details from the document:
1) The case discusses issues of child custody between Gaurav Nagpal and Sumedha Nagpal regarding their child under the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act and Guardians and Wards Act.
2) The facts state that the parties married in 1996 and had a child in 1997, with the mother allegedly abandoning the child in 1999. Various petitions were filed in different courts regarding custody.
3) The main issues were whether the welfare of the child is the paramount consideration in determining custody, and the court's power to make orders regarding guardianship.
Salamat ansari and ors v state of up
This document is a court order from the Allahabad High Court regarding a writ petition filed by Salamat Ansari and others seeking to quash an FIR registered against them.
The court notes that the key petitioner, Priyanka Kharwar, is an adult who willingly converted to Islam and married Salamat Ansari under Muslim rites more than a year ago. While the state argued the conversion and marriage had no validity, the court found that as consenting adults, Priyanka and Salamat have a right to live together by choice which is protected under the right to life and liberty in the Indian Constitution.
The court order references several past Supreme Court rulings affirming an individual's freedom of choice
Kasturi_Sushma_Khandekar_vs_State_of_Maharashtra___Ors_.pdf
1. The petitioner challenged the invalidation of her caste certificate by the Scrutiny Committee. The main issue was whether the petitioner could claim the social status of her father or mother.
2. The court examined evidence which showed the petitioner was entirely brought up by her mother who belongs to the Mahar Scheduled Caste. The parents divorced when the petitioner was young.
3. The court found the petitioner is entitled to claim the social status of her mother based on precedents. It quashed the Scrutiny Committee's order and remanded the matter for a fresh decision within 3 months.
04121601shd
This document summarizes a court case regarding whether a child's aunt and uncle had standing to file an independent custody action while a child in need of services (CHINS) case was pending in juvenile court. The court held that the aunt and uncle did have standing under Indiana law to bring the custody action. However, the circuit court should have stayed the custody proceedings and deferred to the juvenile court's exclusive jurisdiction over the CHINS case until it was concluded. Now that the CHINS case has ended, dismissing the custody action for lack of jurisdiction was an error. The case establishes that third parties have standing to seek custody, but circuit courts must defer to juvenile courts when a CHINS case is already pending.
Umar khalid order
The document is an order from a court case involving the bail application of Umar Khalid regarding FIR No. 101/2020 filed at PS Khajuri Khas. The key points are:
1) Umar Khalid is accused of being involved in a larger conspiracy case related to the February 2020 Delhi riots based on his disclosure statement and meeting with accused Tahir Hussain and Khalid Saifi as identified by a witness.
2) The defense argued Umar Khalid was not physically present during the crime and deserves bail on the grounds of parity with other accused granted bail in the case.
3) The prosecution contends Umar Khalid was part of a larger conspiracy to incite
Allahabad High Court order.pdf
The document is a court order regarding a bail application. It summarizes that the applicant Monu is accused of kidnapping and rape of a 17-year-old girl, with whom he had a child. The court grants bail to Monu on conditions that he marries the victim within 15 days of release, registers the marriage within a month, and provides rights to the victim and child as his wife and daughter. Monu must also appear on all court dates and not delay evidence collection.
mohammed-zubair-v-state-of-up-thru-prin-secy-addl-chief-secy-home-lko-and-oth...
1) Mohammed Zubair filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR registered against him for allegedly insulting religious beliefs in a tweet.
2) The court examined the allegations in the FIR and Zubair's criminal history of similar cases.
3) The court concluded that the matter was premature as investigation just began, and the allegations require further investigation and determination in trial court. Dismissing the writ petition, the court said there was sufficient ground for investigation.
Embed-7.pdfp;kpokipppedoioediouedooedijed
उत्तर प्रदेश में अंतरधार्मिक जोड़े और जिनके पास विवाह पंजीकरण प्रमाण नहीं है, वे स्वयं को संवैधानिक अधिकारों के अभाव में पाते हैं क्योंकि इलाहाबाद उच्च न्यायालय ने पुलिस सुरक्षा के लिए उनकी याचिकाओं को चुनिंदा रूप से खारिज कर दिया है।
Khalid v State.pdf
This document summarizes a court judgment regarding a petition challenging an order extending the period of investigation and detention of the accused, including the petitioner, in an FIR related to the February 2020 Delhi riots. Key points:
1. The petitioner argued he was not given a copy of the application seeking extension nor a meaningful chance to oppose it, violating his Article 21 rights.
2. The court examined whether the accused has a right to oppose such extensions and if they are entitled to a copy of the application.
3. The judgment will decide these two issues: a) right to oppose extensions, and b) right to a copy of the application seeking extension.
Delhi hc shifa ur rehman judgment may 7
This document is a court judgment regarding a petition filed by Shifa-ur-Rehman, President of the Alumni Association of Jamia Milia Islamia, who was arrested in connection with an FIR related to the 2020 Delhi riots. The petition challenges an order extending the period of investigation and the petitioner's detention. The court heard arguments from both sides on issues such as whether the petitioner was denied the right to consult his lawyer and whether the reasons provided for extension were sufficient. The court considered the matter in light of relevant sections of the UAPA and precedents.
Hany babu order dated june 3
The court heard arguments from counsel for the petitioner Jenny Roweena and the two respondents, the State of Maharashtra and NIA, regarding the medical report of the petitioner's husband Dr. Hany Babu Tharayil. While the petitioner's counsel argued that the report suggested he still required critical care and should be allowed house arrest, the NIA objected stating the report said he was ready for discharge. The court then requested the hospital to further examine the patient and provide an updated report by June 14th. It also allowed the interim order to continue and permitted family visits as per hospital protocol until the next hearing date of June 15th.
689 2020 37_1501_24378_judgement_15-oct-2020
The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal regarding a domestic violence case and issues of interpreting the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The appellant's son was married to the respondent, and they lived together in the appellant's house. However, marital issues arose and the son filed for divorce. The respondent then filed a domestic violence complaint. The appellant subsequently filed a lawsuit seeking to remove the respondent from the property. The trial court ruled in favor of the appellant, but the high court overturned this decision and remanded the case. The appellant then appealed to the Supreme Court.
Respondent Moot Memorial including Charges and Argument Advanced.docx
Moot Memorial argument from Petitioner side
Charges based on Sections 304B and 498B of the Indian Penal Code and 113-B of Indian Evidence Act.
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
The legal profession, which has historically been male-dominated, has experienced a significant increase in the number of women entering the field over the past few decades. Despite this progress, women lawyers continue to encounter various challenges as they strive for top positions.
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...Syed Muhammad Humza Hussain
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordinary And Special Businesses And Ordinary And Special Resolutions with Companies (Postal Ballot) Regulations, 2018More Related Content
Similar to Allbad hc habc(a) 745 2020
Jammu kashmir hc order
1) The court heard from petitioner 1, who submitted that she converted to Islam of her own free will and married petitioner 2 without force. She stated she faces threats to her life from respondents 6 and 7 due to her marriage.
2) Petitioner 1 provided documents showing she is of legal age to marry. She asked the court to protect her life and that of her husband based on constitutional guarantees.
3) The court directed respondents 1-5, including police, to ensure the petitioners' safety and are not harassed by respondents 6 and 7, and to allow them to live married without interference.
Allahabad High Court judgement parens patriae.pdf
This document summarizes a court case regarding custody of a minor child. The appellants are the biological parents of the child seeking custody, while the respondents are the maternal uncle and aunt currently having custody. The family court ruled against the parents on the issue of custody, finding it is in the best interest of the child to remain with the uncle and aunt based on the child's wishes. The parents have appealed this ruling. The key issues are whether the biological parents have a right to custody, and whether they are entitled to any other relief.
July delhi hc order
1. Gulfisha Fatima filed a writ petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus to direct the State to produce her and release her from what she claims is illegal custody.
2. She was arrested in connection with multiple FIRs including charges under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act. Her bail applications were dismissed except for one case where she was granted bail.
3. The court dismissed the writ petition stating that her detention was not illegal as she was in judicial custody pursuant to court orders and the remedy lies in appealing those orders, not through a writ of habeas corpus.
Preet singh and ors order
The document is a court order regarding an application for bail by Preet Singh, who has been accused of offenses under the IPC and Epidemic Diseases Act related to organizing a gathering without permission. The investigating officer opposed bail, citing video evidence of Singh's presence and the risk of further offenses. However, the court denied bail, noting that while the offenses are bailable, Singh's case differs from a previously bailed accused who was not seen inciting crowds in video clips as Singh was. The court found that further investigation was needed and denied bail at this stage.
Bom hc bail is recruit order
1. The appellant, Iqbal Ahmed Kabir Ahmed, who was the original accused No. 3, filed an application for bail which was rejected by the special judge. He has filed this appeal against the rejection.
2. The key evidence against the appellant includes the recovery of an oath from his house pursuant to disclosure by an co-accused, and pointing out an electric switchboard in his house where an IED was allegedly soldered. Statements of witnesses also indicate the appellant participated in meetings where actions regarding perceived threats to Islam were discussed.
3. The prosecution argues the material is sufficient to show a prima facie case against the appellant and reasonable grounds exist to believe the accusations, thereby invoking the
Allahabad hc bail(a) 16315 2021
This document is a court order summarizing a bail application hearing for a case involving charges of rape, fraud, criminal intimidation, and unlawful religious conversion. The applicant, Sonu Rajpoot, sought bail while awaiting trial. The court summarized the arguments of the applicant's lawyer, who argued that the victim was a consenting adult and the applicant was falsely accused due to a religious conversion dispute. The prosecution opposed bail. Considering the circumstances, lack of evidence tampering, and consent between the applicant and victim, the court granted bail to the applicant with conditions including not harassing the victim.
M p bangle seller bail
1) The applicant Golu @ Tasneem @ Taslim filed a bail application in the High Court of Madhya Pradesh seeking bail in connection with a crime registered under various sections of IPC and POCSO Act.
2) It was argued for the applicant that he is the first offender and has been in custody since August 23, 2021. His custodial interrogation is no longer required.
3) The prosecution opposed the bail plea submitting that various identity cards of different names were recovered from the applicant. The court examined the facts of the case and granted bail to the applicant with various conditions.
Gaurav nagpal v. sumedha nagpal
This case summary provides an overview of the key details from the document:
1) The case discusses issues of child custody between Gaurav Nagpal and Sumedha Nagpal regarding their child under the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act and Guardians and Wards Act.
2) The facts state that the parties married in 1996 and had a child in 1997, with the mother allegedly abandoning the child in 1999. Various petitions were filed in different courts regarding custody.
3) The main issues were whether the welfare of the child is the paramount consideration in determining custody, and the court's power to make orders regarding guardianship.
Salamat ansari and ors v state of up
This document is a court order from the Allahabad High Court regarding a writ petition filed by Salamat Ansari and others seeking to quash an FIR registered against them.
The court notes that the key petitioner, Priyanka Kharwar, is an adult who willingly converted to Islam and married Salamat Ansari under Muslim rites more than a year ago. While the state argued the conversion and marriage had no validity, the court found that as consenting adults, Priyanka and Salamat have a right to live together by choice which is protected under the right to life and liberty in the Indian Constitution.
The court order references several past Supreme Court rulings affirming an individual's freedom of choice
Kasturi_Sushma_Khandekar_vs_State_of_Maharashtra___Ors_.pdf
1. The petitioner challenged the invalidation of her caste certificate by the Scrutiny Committee. The main issue was whether the petitioner could claim the social status of her father or mother.
2. The court examined evidence which showed the petitioner was entirely brought up by her mother who belongs to the Mahar Scheduled Caste. The parents divorced when the petitioner was young.
3. The court found the petitioner is entitled to claim the social status of her mother based on precedents. It quashed the Scrutiny Committee's order and remanded the matter for a fresh decision within 3 months.
04121601shd
This document summarizes a court case regarding whether a child's aunt and uncle had standing to file an independent custody action while a child in need of services (CHINS) case was pending in juvenile court. The court held that the aunt and uncle did have standing under Indiana law to bring the custody action. However, the circuit court should have stayed the custody proceedings and deferred to the juvenile court's exclusive jurisdiction over the CHINS case until it was concluded. Now that the CHINS case has ended, dismissing the custody action for lack of jurisdiction was an error. The case establishes that third parties have standing to seek custody, but circuit courts must defer to juvenile courts when a CHINS case is already pending.
Umar khalid order
The document is an order from a court case involving the bail application of Umar Khalid regarding FIR No. 101/2020 filed at PS Khajuri Khas. The key points are:
1) Umar Khalid is accused of being involved in a larger conspiracy case related to the February 2020 Delhi riots based on his disclosure statement and meeting with accused Tahir Hussain and Khalid Saifi as identified by a witness.
2) The defense argued Umar Khalid was not physically present during the crime and deserves bail on the grounds of parity with other accused granted bail in the case.
3) The prosecution contends Umar Khalid was part of a larger conspiracy to incite
Allahabad High Court order.pdf
The document is a court order regarding a bail application. It summarizes that the applicant Monu is accused of kidnapping and rape of a 17-year-old girl, with whom he had a child. The court grants bail to Monu on conditions that he marries the victim within 15 days of release, registers the marriage within a month, and provides rights to the victim and child as his wife and daughter. Monu must also appear on all court dates and not delay evidence collection.
mohammed-zubair-v-state-of-up-thru-prin-secy-addl-chief-secy-home-lko-and-oth...
1) Mohammed Zubair filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR registered against him for allegedly insulting religious beliefs in a tweet.
2) The court examined the allegations in the FIR and Zubair's criminal history of similar cases.
3) The court concluded that the matter was premature as investigation just began, and the allegations require further investigation and determination in trial court. Dismissing the writ petition, the court said there was sufficient ground for investigation.
Embed-7.pdfp;kpokipppedoioediouedooedijed
उत्तर प्रदेश में अंतरधार्मिक जोड़े और जिनके पास विवाह पंजीकरण प्रमाण नहीं है, वे स्वयं को संवैधानिक अधिकारों के अभाव में पाते हैं क्योंकि इलाहाबाद उच्च न्यायालय ने पुलिस सुरक्षा के लिए उनकी याचिकाओं को चुनिंदा रूप से खारिज कर दिया है।
Khalid v State.pdf
This document summarizes a court judgment regarding a petition challenging an order extending the period of investigation and detention of the accused, including the petitioner, in an FIR related to the February 2020 Delhi riots. Key points:
1. The petitioner argued he was not given a copy of the application seeking extension nor a meaningful chance to oppose it, violating his Article 21 rights.
2. The court examined whether the accused has a right to oppose such extensions and if they are entitled to a copy of the application.
3. The judgment will decide these two issues: a) right to oppose extensions, and b) right to a copy of the application seeking extension.
Delhi hc shifa ur rehman judgment may 7
This document is a court judgment regarding a petition filed by Shifa-ur-Rehman, President of the Alumni Association of Jamia Milia Islamia, who was arrested in connection with an FIR related to the 2020 Delhi riots. The petition challenges an order extending the period of investigation and the petitioner's detention. The court heard arguments from both sides on issues such as whether the petitioner was denied the right to consult his lawyer and whether the reasons provided for extension were sufficient. The court considered the matter in light of relevant sections of the UAPA and precedents.
Hany babu order dated june 3
The court heard arguments from counsel for the petitioner Jenny Roweena and the two respondents, the State of Maharashtra and NIA, regarding the medical report of the petitioner's husband Dr. Hany Babu Tharayil. While the petitioner's counsel argued that the report suggested he still required critical care and should be allowed house arrest, the NIA objected stating the report said he was ready for discharge. The court then requested the hospital to further examine the patient and provide an updated report by June 14th. It also allowed the interim order to continue and permitted family visits as per hospital protocol until the next hearing date of June 15th.
689 2020 37_1501_24378_judgement_15-oct-2020
The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal regarding a domestic violence case and issues of interpreting the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The appellant's son was married to the respondent, and they lived together in the appellant's house. However, marital issues arose and the son filed for divorce. The respondent then filed a domestic violence complaint. The appellant subsequently filed a lawsuit seeking to remove the respondent from the property. The trial court ruled in favor of the appellant, but the high court overturned this decision and remanded the case. The appellant then appealed to the Supreme Court.
Respondent Moot Memorial including Charges and Argument Advanced.docx
Moot Memorial argument from Petitioner side
Charges based on Sections 304B and 498B of the Indian Penal Code and 113-B of Indian Evidence Act.
Similar to Allbad hc habc(a) 745 2020 (20)
Kasturi_Sushma_Khandekar_vs_State_of_Maharashtra___Ors_.pdf
Kasturi_Sushma_Khandekar_vs_State_of_Maharashtra___Ors_.pdf
mohammed-zubair-v-state-of-up-thru-prin-secy-addl-chief-secy-home-lko-and-oth...
mohammed-zubair-v-state-of-up-thru-prin-secy-addl-chief-secy-home-lko-and-oth...
Respondent Moot Memorial including Charges and Argument Advanced.docx
Respondent Moot Memorial including Charges and Argument Advanced.docx
Recently uploaded
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
The legal profession, which has historically been male-dominated, has experienced a significant increase in the number of women entering the field over the past few decades. Despite this progress, women lawyers continue to encounter various challenges as they strive for top positions.
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...Syed Muhammad Humza Hussain
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordinary And Special Businesses And Ordinary And Special Resolutions with Companies (Postal Ballot) Regulations, 2018Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...
This guide aims to provide information on how lawyers will be able to use the opportunities provided by AI tools and how such tools could help the business processes of small firms. Its objective is to provide lawyers with some background to understand what they can and cannot realistically expect from these products. This guide aims to give a reference point for small law practices in the EU
against which they can evaluate those classes of AI applications that are probably the most relevant for them.
Search Warrants for NH Law Enforcement Officers
Training aid for law enforcement officers related to search warrants, the requirements needed, drafting, and execution of the search warrant.
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
一比一原版(Lincoln毕业证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证如何办理
Lincoln硕士毕业证成绩单【微信95270640】办理新西兰林肯大学毕业证原版一模一样、Lincoln毕业证制作【Q微信95270640】《新西兰林肯大学毕业证购买流程》《Lincoln成绩单制作》新西兰林肯大学毕业证书Lincoln毕业证文凭新西兰林肯大学
本科毕业证书,学历学位认证如何办理【留学国外学位学历认证、毕业证、成绩单、大学Offer、雅思托福代考、语言证书、学生卡、高仿教育部认证等一切高仿或者真实可查认证服务】代办国外（海外）英国、加拿大、美国、新西兰、澳大利亚、新西兰等国外各大学毕业证、文凭学历证书、成绩单、学历学位认证真实可查。
[留学文凭学历认证(留信认证使馆认证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证成绩单毕业证证书大学Offer请假条成绩单语言证书国际回国人员证明高仿教育部认证申请学校等一切高仿或者真实可查认证服务。
多年留学服务公司,拥有海外样板无数能完美1:1还原海外各国大学degreeDiplomaTranscripts等毕业材料。海外大学毕业材料都有哪些工艺呢？工艺难度主要由：烫金.钢印.底纹.水印.防伪光标.热敏防伪等等组成。而且我们每天都在更新海外文凭的样板以求所有同学都能享受到完美的品质服务。
国外毕业证学位证成绩单办理方法：
1客户提供办理新西兰林肯大学新西兰林肯大学毕业证学位证信息：姓名生日专业学位毕业时间等（如信息不确定可以咨询顾问：我们有专业老师帮你查询）；
2开始安排制作毕业证成绩单电子图；
3毕业证成绩单电子版做好以后发送给您确认；
4毕业证成绩单电子版您确认信息无误之后安排制作成品；
5成品做好拍照或者视频给您确认；
6快递给客户（国内顺丰国外DHLUPS等快读邮寄）
— — — — 我们是挂科和未毕业同学们的福音我们是实体公司精益求精的工艺！ — — — -
一真实留信认证的作用(私企外企荣誉的见证):
1：该专业认证可证明留学生真实留学身份同时对留学生所学专业等级给予评定。
2：国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书这个入网证书并且可以归档到地方。
3：凡是获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内将在公安部网内查询个人身份证信息后同步读取人才网入库信息。
4：个人职称评审加20分个人信誉贷款加10分。
5：在国家人才网主办的全国网络招聘大会中纳入资料供国家500强等高端企业选择人才。问山娃想买什么想吃什么山娃知道父亲赚钱很辛苦除了书籍和文具山娃啥也不要能牵着父亲的手满城闲逛他已心满意足了父亲连挑了三套童装叫山娃试穿山娃有点不想父亲说城里不比乡下要穿得漂漂亮亮爸怎么不穿得漂亮望着父亲山娃反问道父亲听了并不回答只是吃吃地笑山娃很精神越逛越起劲父亲却越逛越疲倦望着父亲呵欠连天的样子山娃也说困了累了回家吧小屋闷罐一般头顶上的三叶扇彻夜呜呜作响搅得满屋热气腾腾也搅得山娃心烦意乱父亲一的
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
Learn more on how to obtain the work permit for self-employed persons in Italy at https://immigration-italy.com/selfemployment-work-permit-in-italy/.
XYZ-v.-state-of-Maharashtra-Bombay-HC-Writ-Petition-6340-2023.pdf
असंगत न्यायालयी फैसलों के कारण भारत में महिलाओं को सुरक्षित गर्भपात के लिए एक भ्रामक और अनुचित कानूनी लड़ाई का सामना करना पड़ रहा है।
原版制作(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptx
Excited to share insights from my recent presentation on genocide! 💡 In light of ongoing debates, it's crucial to delve into the nuances of this grave crime.
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence Lawyers
Discover how Mississauga criminal defence lawyers defend clients facing weapon offence charges with expert legal guidance and courtroom representation.
To know more visit: https://www.saini-law.com/
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने यह भी माना था कि मजिस्ट्रेट का यह कर्तव्य है कि वह सुनिश्चित करे कि अधिकारी पीएमएलए के तहत निर्धारित प्रक्रिया के साथ-साथ संवैधानिक सुरक्षा उपायों का भी उचित रूप से पालन करें।
Energizing Communities, Fostering Growth, Sustaining Futures
USDA grants bolster rural communities, driving growth, sustainability, and prosperity through strategic development initiatives and financial support.
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
slide deck : Patenting innovations in 3D printing
Recently uploaded (20)
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
XYZ-v.-state-of-Maharashtra-Bombay-HC-Writ-Petition-6340-2023.pdf
XYZ-v.-state-of-Maharashtra-Bombay-HC-Writ-Petition-6340-2023.pdf
fnaf lore.pptx ...................................
fnaf lore.pptx ...................................
Tax Law Notes on taxation law tax law for 10th sem
Tax Law Notes on taxation law tax law for 10th sem
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence Lawyers
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence Lawyers
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
Energizing Communities, Fostering Growth, Sustaining Futures
Energizing Communities, Fostering Growth, Sustaining Futures
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
Allbad hc habc(a) 745 2020
- 1. Court No. - 43 Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 745 of 2020 Petitioner :- Smt. Shikha (Corpus) And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J. Hon'ble Vivek Agarwal,J. 1. Heard Sri Manoj Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Ajay Vikram Yadav, learned counsel for the informant and Sri Gambhir Singh, learned AGA for the State. 2. This writ petition has been filed, seeking a writ of direction in the nature of mandamus directing to the Respondent No. 2 and 3 to produce the corpus. 3. Sri Vipin Kumar, the I.O. along with the corpus is present, pursuant to our previous order. He produced case diary in which certificate issued by Head Master, Higher Primary Education, Etah is enclosed in which it is clearly mentioned that corpus had taken admission in said school on 14.07.2005 in class I vide serial no is 616 in the scholar register wherein her date of birth is mentioned as 04.10.1999. Copy of scholar register is enclosed along with the case diary. Therefore, requirement of Section 94 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 in regard to presumption and determination of age are fulfilled. 4. Learned C.J.M., in not appreciating the provisions of Section 94 of the J.J.Act held that when a certificate from school is available then any other evidence becomes secondary in nature and should not be relied especially when the birth certificate produced by respondent on 25.03.2019 issued by the competent authority and the date of registration of birth is mentioned as 17.03.2019. This certificate will not taken precedence over the school entry register and the certificate issued on the basis of scholar register. 5. We interacted with the corpus who submits that she is a major, her date of birth is 04.10.1999, she has attained the age of majority and has entered into a wedlock. He submits that she wants to live with her husband namely Salman @ Karan who is also present in the Court. 6. As the corpus has attained the age of majority and she has a
- 2. choice to live her life on her own terms and she has expressed that she wants to live with her husband Salman @ Karan she is free to move as per her own choice without any restriction or hinderance being created by third party. 7. The learned C.J.M. Etah vide order dated 07.12.2020 had handed over the corpus in the custody of C.W.C., Etah. which on passed 08.12.2020 handed over the custody to her parents without any application of mind and against her wish. 8. The act of C.J.M., Etah and that of the C.W.C., Etah reflects lack of appreciation of legal provisions. 9. The petition is allowed. The FIR dated 27.09.2020 registered as F.I.R. No. 0371 of 2020, under Sections 366 I.P.C., Police Station- Kotwali Dehat, District Etah are hereby quashed. 10. The I.O. will ensure that appropriate protection is granted to the corpus and her husband till they return to their residence. 11. The S.S.P, Prayagraj is directed to provide necessary police security for safe passage of the couple. Order Date :- 18.12.2020 Ujjawal Digitally signed by Justice Pankaj Naqvi Date: 2020.12.18 18:03:35 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by Justice Vivek Agarwal Date: 2020.12.18 18:04:09 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad