VIP Call Girls Service Saharanpur Aishwarya 8250192130 Independent Escort Ser...
Union organization (1)
1. Union OrganizationUnion Organization
Picking a targetPicking a target
1.1. Union return on investment depends on costUnion return on investment depends on cost
of organizingof organizing
2.2. Expected cost of servicing workersExpected cost of servicing workers
3.3. Expected probability of winExpected probability of win
4.4. Expected bargaining strength in the sectorExpected bargaining strength in the sector
2. Union OrganizationUnion Organization
Picking a targetPicking a target
1.1. Union return on investment depends on cost ofUnion return on investment depends on cost of
organizingorganizing
2.2. Expected cost of servicing workersExpected cost of servicing workers
– Heterogeneity of workers, interestsHeterogeneity of workers, interests
– Worker turnoverWorker turnover
– Part-time vs. full-time vs. transitory workersPart-time vs. full-time vs. transitory workers
– Worker ability to pay duesWorker ability to pay dues
– Size of unit (returns to scale)Size of unit (returns to scale)
– Monopoly or oligopolyMonopoly or oligopoly
3. Union OrganizationUnion Organization
Picking a targetPicking a target
3.3. Expected probability of winExpected probability of win
– Wages and benefits in the firm relative to localWages and benefits in the firm relative to local
reference, industry normsreference, industry norms
– Worker sense of inequity or injusticeWorker sense of inequity or injustice
Campaigns based on workplace dignity: 56% winCampaigns based on workplace dignity: 56% win
Traditional wages, hours, job security: 27% winTraditional wages, hours, job security: 27% win
– Probability of firm resistanceProbability of firm resistance
– Phone sampling, researchPhone sampling, research
4. Union OrganizationUnion Organization
Picking a targetPicking a target
4. Expected bargaining strength in the sector4. Expected bargaining strength in the sector
Depends on the elasticity of labor demandDepends on the elasticity of labor demand
Laws of derived demandLaws of derived demand
Depends on the growth of labor demandDepends on the growth of labor demand
Growing firm profitsGrowing firm profits
Growing firm revenuesGrowing firm revenues
Growing employmentGrowing employment
Growing labor productivityGrowing labor productivity
Can also help with sense of fairnessCan also help with sense of fairness
5. Union OrganizationUnion Organization
Labor demand: N: number of workers; W: WageLabor demand: N: number of workers; W: Wage
Demand
N
W
W1
W0
N1 N0
Wage Bill = W*N; Change in wage bill = W1N1 – W0N0
6. Union OrganizationUnion Organization
Labor demand: N: number of workers; W: WageLabor demand: N: number of workers; W: Wage
Relatively Inelastic
Demand
N
W
W1
W0
N1 N0
Change in wage bill = W1N2 – W0N0 is smaller than with
elastic demand
Relatively Elastic
Demand
N2
7. Union OrganizationUnion Organization
EEDD = Elasticity of demand == Elasticity of demand =
% change in employment% change in employment
% change in wage% change in wage
0 < E0 < EDD < 1: inelastic demand< 1: inelastic demand
EEDD = 1: unitary elastic demand= 1: unitary elastic demand
EEDD > 1: elastic demand> 1: elastic demand
Wage increase with inelastic demand will raise the wage billWage increase with inelastic demand will raise the wage bill
Wage increase with elastic demand will lower the wage billWage increase with elastic demand will lower the wage bill
8. Union OrganizationUnion Organization
EEDD = Elasticity of demand = 0.3 < 1, inelastic= Elasticity of demand = 0.3 < 1, inelastic
% change in employment = 3%% change in employment = 3%
% change in wage = 10%% change in wage = 10%
WW11 = W= W00 (1.10)(1.10)
NN1 =1 = NN00 (0.97)(0.97)
Change in wage bill = WChange in wage bill = W11NN11 – W– W00NN00
== WW00 (1.10)* N(1.10)* N00 (0.97) - W(0.97) - W00NN00
= 0.067*W= 0.067*W00NN00
So wage bill rises when wage rises when the elasticity of demand is below 1.So wage bill rises when wage rises when the elasticity of demand is below 1.
9. Union OrganizationUnion Organization
Laws of derived demandLaws of derived demand
Union labor demand is less elastic when …Union labor demand is less elastic when …
Product demand is less elasticProduct demand is less elastic
Few substitutes for the productFew substitutes for the product
Monopoly/oligopolyMonopoly/oligopoly
Weak import penetrationWeak import penetration
Examples?Examples?
There are few substitutes for union laborThere are few substitutes for union labor
No ready supply of replacement workersNo ready supply of replacement workers
High union density in the industryHigh union density in the industry
Nonunion options paid comparable wages (Davis-Bacon)Nonunion options paid comparable wages (Davis-Bacon)
10. Union OrganizationUnion Organization
Laws of derived demandLaws of derived demand
Union labor demand is less elastic when …Union labor demand is less elastic when …
““Importance of being unimportant”—labor costs are aImportance of being unimportant”—labor costs are a
small fraction of total costssmall fraction of total costs
Heavily capitalized sectorsHeavily capitalized sectors
Crafts vs. industrial unionsCrafts vs. industrial unions
Only holds when elasticity of demand for product is biggerOnly holds when elasticity of demand for product is bigger
than the elasticity of substitution (holds most of the time)than the elasticity of substitution (holds most of the time)
11. Steps for union recognition by NLRBSteps for union recognition by NLRB
electionelection
1.1. Initial contactInitial contact
Workers contact unionWorkers contact union
Union targets workersUnion targets workers
2.2. Union typically assigns an organizerUnion typically assigns an organizer
Determines campaign focusDetermines campaign focus
Solicits assistance and trains employees sympathetic to theSolicits assistance and trains employees sympathetic to the
unionunion
Nonemployees do not have access to the premises as long as thereNonemployees do not have access to the premises as long as there
is an alternative way to contact workersis an alternative way to contact workers
Employees are known by fellow workersEmployees are known by fellow workers
If the union is successful, it will need an infrastructure of employeesIf the union is successful, it will need an infrastructure of employees
to serve as stewards, local leadersto serve as stewards, local leaders
12. Steps for union recognition by NLRBSteps for union recognition by NLRB
electionelection
3.3. SolicitationSolicitation
• Work time vs personal time at work vs nonworkWork time vs personal time at work vs nonwork
timetime
• NLRB reserves work time for work—limitsNLRB reserves work time for work—limits
interference in firm business practiceinterference in firm business practice
• Personal time at work (lunch, breaks) are open forPersonal time at work (lunch, breaks) are open for
oral solicitation by employeesoral solicitation by employees
• Pro union posters, bulletins, clothing, buttons ok ifPro union posters, bulletins, clothing, buttons ok if
they do not disrupt businessthey do not disrupt business
• Off-premises solicitation is okOff-premises solicitation is ok
13. Steps for union recognition by NLRBSteps for union recognition by NLRB
electionelection
4.4. Authorization cardsAuthorization cards
Minimum of 30% needed to authorize electionMinimum of 30% needed to authorize election
(unions will not press for election unless they have(unions will not press for election unless they have
majority. AFL-CIO recommends 75%)majority. AFL-CIO recommends 75%)
5. Representation Petition5. Representation Petition
Union submits RC petition. NLRB verifiesUnion submits RC petition. NLRB verifies
minimum 30% interest.minimum 30% interest.
Cross-petition from other unions requires additionalCross-petition from other unions requires additional
10% interest10% interest
14. Steps for union recognition by NLRBSteps for union recognition by NLRB
electionelection
Strict Rules Governing Firm Behavior During UnionStrict Rules Governing Firm Behavior During Union
CampaignCampaign
15. Steps for union recognition by NLRB electionSteps for union recognition by NLRB election
6.6. Secret Ballot electionSecret Ballot election
Within 30 days of verification of need for electionWithin 30 days of verification of need for election
50% required to win50% required to win
Run-off among top two options if no majorityRun-off among top two options if no majority
Voters include everyone in bargaining unitVoters include everyone in bargaining unit
Employed at least 30 days in the year priorEmployed at least 30 days in the year prior
Avoidance of fraudulent employeesAvoidance of fraudulent employees
Economic strikers within 12 months of strikeEconomic strikers within 12 months of strike
Replacement workersReplacement workers
Part-time workers with continuing interestPart-time workers with continuing interest
SAG: anyone who worked at least two days inSAG: anyone who worked at least two days in
last 12 monthslast 12 months
16. Steps for union recognition by NLRB electionSteps for union recognition by NLRB election
7.7. Rules on election dayRules on election day
1.1. No mass meetings 24 hours before electionNo mass meetings 24 hours before election
2.2. Firm cannot offer benefits or reprisalsFirm cannot offer benefits or reprisals
No special pay from firm to compensate for voting expensesNo special pay from firm to compensate for voting expenses
Special pay from union for voting expenses is ok, otherSpecial pay from union for voting expenses is ok, other
compensation is illegalcompensation is illegal
17. Steps for union recognition by NLRBSteps for union recognition by NLRB
electionelection
8.8. Certification of ElectionCertification of Election
If NLRB certifies union win, union is immediately certified. Has oneIf NLRB certifies union win, union is immediately certified. Has one
year to get a contractyear to get a contract
Contract bar—no other elections allowed for one year, regardless ofContract bar—no other elections allowed for one year, regardless of
who winswho wins
If firm is guilty of ULP, NLRB may call for another vote; orIf firm is guilty of ULP, NLRB may call for another vote; or
Gissel doctrine NLRB may certify union if firm behavior is consideredGissel doctrine NLRB may certify union if firm behavior is considered
so bad as to make a fair election impossible and there is evidenceso bad as to make a fair election impossible and there is evidence
that union has a majority; orthat union has a majority; or
J.P. Stevens ordered to bargain, even though union did not demonstrateJ.P. Stevens ordered to bargain, even though union did not demonstrate
majority through authorization cardsmajority through authorization cards
18. Voluntary RecognitionVoluntary Recognition
If firm volunteers to recognize union, NLRBIf firm volunteers to recognize union, NLRB
will certify union.will certify union.
Recognition picketing (limit of 30 days, after whichRecognition picketing (limit of 30 days, after which
firm can ask for expedited election)firm can ask for expedited election)
Economic pressure (boycotts, political pressure)Economic pressure (boycotts, political pressure)
Prior agreements between firm and worker to acceptPrior agreements between firm and worker to accept
recognition cards in lieu of NLRB electionrecognition cards in lieu of NLRB election
Absent election, union at risk of decertificationAbsent election, union at risk of decertification
election,election,
19. Eaton and Kriesky on Neutrality and CardEaton and Kriesky on Neutrality and Card
Check Agreements ILRR (October 2001)Check Agreements ILRR (October 2001)
Unions may wish to forge agreements that lower theUnions may wish to forge agreements that lower the
cost of organizing or the standard for successcost of organizing or the standard for success
Agreements with firms that have multiple sitesAgreements with firms that have multiple sites
Centralized agreementsCentralized agreements
Generalized agreement based on a few local relationshipsGeneralized agreement based on a few local relationships
Agreement with entirely new firmsAgreement with entirely new firms
Agreements with Associations of EmployersAgreements with Associations of Employers
Most common: Steel, autos, communications, hospitality,Most common: Steel, autos, communications, hospitality,
gaminggaming
(66%) restrict agreement to specific occupations, job(66%) restrict agreement to specific occupations, job
classifications, or facilitiesclassifications, or facilities
20. Types of agreementsTypes of agreements
Neutrality Agreements:Neutrality Agreements:
““Neither helping nor hindering” union organizationNeither helping nor hindering” union organization
efforts, facts allowed (UAW, CWA)efforts, facts allowed (UAW, CWA)
““Employer will not communicate opposition; employerEmployer will not communicate opposition; employer
will not attack or demean the union or its representativeswill not attack or demean the union or its representatives
(HERE)(HERE)
Firm will not provide support to anti-union groupsFirm will not provide support to anti-union groups
(USWA)(USWA)
Weaker statements: strive for climate free of hostility; onlyWeaker statements: strive for climate free of hostility; only
positive, pro-company statements will be issuedpositive, pro-company statements will be issued
21. Types of agreementsTypes of agreements
Card Check Agreements:Card Check Agreements:
(73%) Third party neutral will validate(73%) Third party neutral will validate
membership cards signed by union members. Firmmembership cards signed by union members. Firm
will recognize union if a minimum level is reachedwill recognize union if a minimum level is reached
(say 65%)(say 65%)
Similar to above, but if percentage of cards isSimilar to above, but if percentage of cards is
above 50% but below threshold, a nonNLRBabove 50% but below threshold, a nonNLRB
election is held. If percentage is between 30% andelection is held. If percentage is between 30% and
50%, NLRB election held.50%, NLRB election held.
22. Types of agreementsTypes of agreements
Access:Access:
(66%) Union will be allowed on the firm premises.(66%) Union will be allowed on the firm premises.
(36%) Union given lists of employees in the bargaining(36%) Union given lists of employees in the bargaining
unitunit
First contractFirst contract
Accretion of new sites into existing bargaining units (50%Accretion of new sites into existing bargaining units (50%
of multi-site agreements)of multi-site agreements)
Arbitration if first contract not reached (USWA)Arbitration if first contract not reached (USWA)
Negotiations begin immediately upon recognitionNegotiations begin immediately upon recognition
23. DataData
57 International unions with 10,000+ members57 International unions with 10,000+ members
36 respond36 respond
23 had at least one agreement23 had at least one agreement
132 agreements total (113 at least partially132 agreements total (113 at least partially
useable)useable)
Data analyzed only relate to these 113 contractsData analyzed only relate to these 113 contracts
24. Union SuccessUnion Success
RecognitionRecognition
NLRB elections: 46% 1983-1998NLRB elections: 46% 1983-1998
Neutrality only: 46%Neutrality only: 46%
Card Check: 74% (understated viz. NLRB)Card Check: 74% (understated viz. NLRB)
Card check, U.S. public sector: 85%Card check, U.S. public sector: 85%
Card check, Quebec: 83%Card check, Quebec: 83%
Card check, Ontario: 78%Card check, Ontario: 78%
First contractFirst contract
NLRB elections: 66-80%NLRB elections: 66-80%
Neutrality only: 100%Neutrality only: 100%
Card check: 96%Card check: 96%
Does this mean that universal mandatory application ofDoes this mean that universal mandatory application of
card check or neutrality will raise union density?card check or neutrality will raise union density?
25. Thieblot. “The Fall and Future of Unionism inThieblot. “The Fall and Future of Unionism in
Construction.”Construction.” Journal of Labor ResearchJournal of Labor Research
Spring 2001.Spring 2001.
1959 Landrum Griffin Act allows closed shops1959 Landrum Griffin Act allows closed shops
in building trades (pre-hire agreements)in building trades (pre-hire agreements)
Davis Bacon Act (1931); Little Davis BaconDavis Bacon Act (1931); Little Davis Bacon
Acts 2/3 of states); Project Labor AgreementsActs 2/3 of states); Project Labor Agreements
(eg Des Moines Iowa Events Center)(eg Des Moines Iowa Events Center)
Construction has lost density more than mostConstruction has lost density more than most
industriesindustries
26. Why has Union Density fallen inWhy has Union Density fallen in
Construction?Construction?
Demographics: women, educated?Demographics: women, educated?
Insignificant in construction tradesInsignificant in construction trades
10 states repealed little Davis Bacon Acts since10 states repealed little Davis Bacon Acts since
19791979
Most of the decline predates thisMost of the decline predates this
Decline occurs does not slow after Landrum GriffinDecline occurs does not slow after Landrum Griffin
Union/Nonunion Cost StructureUnion/Nonunion Cost Structure
27. Union / Nonunion Cost DifferentialUnion / Nonunion Cost Differential
Pay differential 50% plusPay differential 50% plus
Pay differential largest for the least skilledPay differential largest for the least skilled
How can unionized firm compete?How can unionized firm compete?
28. Union / Nonunion Cost DifferentialUnion / Nonunion Cost Differential
Unit Labor Cost =Unit Labor Cost = W*N = WW*N = W = W= W
QQ (Q/N)(Q/N) (AP(APNN))
W = wageW = wage
N = number of workersN = number of workers
Q = output or revenueQ = output or revenue
If W is 50% higher in union sector, APIf W is 50% higher in union sector, APNN must be at leastmust be at least
50% higher for union firm to be competitive50% higher for union firm to be competitive
29. Union / Nonunion Cost DifferentialUnion / Nonunion Cost Differential
Evidence on relative productivityEvidence on relative productivity
Cost per Sq foot = aCost per Sq foot = a00 + a+ a11*INPUTS + a*INPUTS + a22*(UNION)*(UNION)
aa22 > 0 implies union effect on wages dominates union> 0 implies union effect on wages dominates union
effect on productivityeffect on productivity
aa22 < 0 implies union effect on productivity dominates< 0 implies union effect on productivity dominates
union effect on wageunion effect on wage
Evidence suggests aEvidence suggests a22 > 0; responsible for at least part of> 0; responsible for at least part of
the declinethe decline
30. Union / Nonunion Cost DifferentialUnion / Nonunion Cost Differential
Other sources of higher union costOther sources of higher union cost
Work rulesWork rules
Price of helpersPrice of helpers
Staffing: journeymen vs less skilledStaffing: journeymen vs less skilled
Trade staffing restrictionsTrade staffing restrictions
Slow adjustment to new technologies, tradesSlow adjustment to new technologies, trades
Consequence: union market share has fallen from 75% inConsequence: union market share has fallen from 75% in
1950 to 25% today1950 to 25% today
31. Union / Nonunion Cost DifferentialUnion / Nonunion Cost Differential
Competitive option when unit costs are higher in unionCompetitive option when unit costs are higher in union
sectorsector
Raise costs in nonunion sectorRaise costs in nonunion sector
Role of prevailing wage lawsRole of prevailing wage laws
Government projects are 20% of the market, largely unionGovernment projects are 20% of the market, largely union
Private sector projects are about 80% of the market, largelyPrivate sector projects are about 80% of the market, largely
nonunionnonunion
32. Other Strategies for unionized firms, unionsOther Strategies for unionized firms, unions
UnionsUnions
Job targeting: Try to lower W in union sectorJob targeting: Try to lower W in union sector
““list price vs street price”list price vs street price”
Union pools money on high priced, prevailing wage jobsUnion pools money on high priced, prevailing wage jobs
to subsidize wages on competitive bidsto subsidize wages on competitive bids
Salting: try to lower APSalting: try to lower APNN or raise W in nonunionor raise W in nonunion
sectorsector
More laterMore later
Unionized firmsUnionized firms
Double breasting: union and nonunion crewsDouble breasting: union and nonunion crews
33. Fine. “Union Salting: Reactions and Rulings sinceFine. “Union Salting: Reactions and Rulings since Town andTown and
CountryCountry JournalJournal of Labor Researchof Labor Research Summer 2002.Summer 2002.
Salting: union members or organizers acceptSalting: union members or organizers accept
employment at a nonunion firm with the intentemployment at a nonunion firm with the intent
of filing unfair labor practice charges andof filing unfair labor practice charges and
organizing the work placeorganizing the work place
Aim is to pressure firm to recognize the unionAim is to pressure firm to recognize the union
without a certification election; orwithout a certification election; or
To disrupt nonunion firm production activities andTo disrupt nonunion firm production activities and
lower its cost advantage over union firmslower its cost advantage over union firms
34. Fine. “Union Salting: Reactions and Rulings sinceFine. “Union Salting: Reactions and Rulings since Town andTown and
CountryCountry JournalJournal of Labor Researchof Labor Research Summer 2002.Summer 2002.
NLRB v. Town and Country Electric (1995)NLRB v. Town and Country Electric (1995)
IBEW locals 292 and 343 asked their unemployed members to apply forIBEW locals 292 and 343 asked their unemployed members to apply for
jobs at Town and Country Electricjobs at Town and Country Electric
Those employed trained on how to organize the siteThose employed trained on how to organize the site
How to monitor employer actions for possible ULP chargesHow to monitor employer actions for possible ULP charges
IBEW paid the salts the difference between nonunion and union scale.IBEW paid the salts the difference between nonunion and union scale.
IBEW alleged one salt wrongfully discharged; 10 othersIBEW alleged one salt wrongfully discharged; 10 others
wrongfully refused employmentwrongfully refused employment
NLRB upholds charge; consistently has held that salts areNLRB upholds charge; consistently has held that salts are
entitled to the same rights as other employeesentitled to the same rights as other employees
35. Fine. “Union Salting: Reactions and Rulings sinceFine. “Union Salting: Reactions and Rulings since Town andTown and
CountryCountry JournalJournal of Labor Researchof Labor Research Summer 2002.Summer 2002.
ULP charges rise 36% in nonunion firms afterULP charges rise 36% in nonunion firms after
saltingsalting
NLRB Cases involving saltsNLRB Cases involving salts
1995:1995: 44
1996:1996: 9 (of 262 salt cases filed in 1996)9 (of 262 salt cases filed in 1996)
1997: 101997: 10
1998: 81998: 8
1999: 81999: 8
2000: 162000: 16
36. Fine. “Union Salting: Reactions and Rulings sinceFine. “Union Salting: Reactions and Rulings since Town andTown and
CountryCountry JournalJournal of Labor Researchof Labor Research Summer 2002.Summer 2002.
Salt “charges” upheld by NLRBSalt “charges” upheld by NLRB
18 “refusal to consider”18 “refusal to consider”
22 “refusal to hire”22 “refusal to hire”
19 “unlawful interrogation”19 “unlawful interrogation”
19 “unlawful discharge”19 “unlawful discharge”
Penalties include back pay, reinstatementsPenalties include back pay, reinstatements
37. Fine. “Union Salting: Reactions and Rulings sinceFine. “Union Salting: Reactions and Rulings since Town andTown and
CountryCountry JournalJournal of Labor Researchof Labor Research Summer 2002.Summer 2002.
Employer responsesEmployer responses
Salting insurance paid by the Associated BuildersSalting insurance paid by the Associated Builders
and Contractorsand Contractors
Architectural Glass and Metal Co. Inc. (1997)Architectural Glass and Metal Co. Inc. (1997) can dismisscan dismiss
salts if there is an anti-moonlighting clause insalts if there is an anti-moonlighting clause in
contractcontract
Industrial Company Southeast, Inc. (1997)Industrial Company Southeast, Inc. (1997) Can requireCan require
applications on original forms (union had submittedapplications on original forms (union had submitted
applications on xeroxed application forms.applications on xeroxed application forms.
38. DecertificationDecertification
RD petition must be filed by employeesRD petition must be filed by employees
At least 30% of employees must sign a decertificationAt least 30% of employees must sign a decertification
petitionpetition
Employer cannot encourage this process, mustEmployer cannot encourage this process, must
remain neutralremain neutral
Filed within 60-90 days of expiration of a contract; orFiled within 60-90 days of expiration of a contract; or
if there has been no contract filed within 1 year ofif there has been no contract filed within 1 year of
certification; orcertification; or
After a contract has expiredAfter a contract has expired
39. DecertificationDecertification
RM petition can be filed by the employerRM petition can be filed by the employer
Timing similar to RDTiming similar to RD
Evidence supporting RM petition can include:Evidence supporting RM petition can include:
Unsolicited communications from employees requestingUnsolicited communications from employees requesting
decertification;decertification;
Failure of union to represent workers, fulfillFailure of union to represent workers, fulfill
responsibilities;responsibilities;
Changes in the size of the workforceChanges in the size of the workforce
40. DecertificationDecertification
Unions lose 75% of decertification electionsUnions lose 75% of decertification elections
Unions win 45-50% of certification electionsUnions win 45-50% of certification elections
RD petitions are gaining over time, RC and RMRD petitions are gaining over time, RC and RM
petitions have decreased in relative importance.petitions have decreased in relative importance.
Combined RD + RM mean that decertificationCombined RD + RM mean that decertification
elections are rising in importanceelections are rising in importance
Scott, Hester and Arnold. “Employer-Initiated Elections, 1968-Scott, Hester and Arnold. “Employer-Initiated Elections, 1968-
1992.”1992.” Journal of Labor ResearchJournal of Labor Research Spring 1997.Spring 1997.