Achor, Shawn.  The happiness advantage: How a positive brain fuels success in work and life. Currency, 2010. Boothby, E. J., Clark, M. S., & Bargh, J. A. (2014). Shared experiences are amplified.  Psychological science,  25(12), 2209-2216. Burch, N. (1970). The four stages of competence. Gordon Training International, https://www.gordontraining.com/workplace-programs/ Chapter Citations: Harro, Bobbie. “The Cycle of Socialization.” Readings for Diversity and Social Justice, edited by Adams, Maurianne, Warren J. Blumenfeld, D C. J. Catalano, Keri S. DeJong, Heather Hackman, Larissa E. Hopkins, Barbara J. Love, Madeline L. Peters, Davey Shlasko, and Ximena Zúñiga, Routledge, 2018, pp 27-34. Tatum, Beverly Daniel. “Who am I?” Readings for Diversity and Social Justice, edited by Adams, Maurianne, Warren J. Blumenfeld, D C. J. Catalano, Keri S. DeJong, Heather Hackman, Larissa E. Hopkins, Barbara J. Love, Madeline L. Peters, Davey Shlasko, and Ximena Zúñiga, Routledge, 2018, pp 7-9. Carpenter, Amanda, and Kathryn Greene. "Social penetration theory."  The international encyclopedia of interpersonal communication (2015): 1-4. Dees, J. Gregory. "A tale of two cultures: Charity, problem solving, and the future of social entrepreneurship."  Journal of business ethics 111.3 (2012): 321-334. Duncan, D. (n.d.). The Four Components of Effective Collective Impact: Through the Lens of Assets-Based Community Development and Results-Based Accountability. Asset-Based Community Development Institute Report. Defoore, William. https://www.slideshare.net/wgdefoore/gratitude-appreciation-optimsim 2010. Gardner, Howard. Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books, 1983. Print. GenerationOn. “Taking Action: Four Types of Service.” generationOn, https://s3.amazonaws.com/generationon-production/media/uploaded-files/IPARDE-taking_action_-_four_types_of_service_0.pdf. Accessed 1 August 2021. Grant, A. M., & Gino, F. (2010). A little thanks goes a long way: Explaining why gratitude expressions motivate prosocial behavior.  Journal of personality and social psychology,  98(6), 946. Komives, Susan R., Nance Lucas, and Timothy R. McMahon.  Exploring Leadership: For College Students Who Want to Make a Difference. John Wiley & Sons, 2013. Kretzmann, John, and John P. McKnight. "Assets‐based community development."  National civic review 85.4 (1996): 23-29. Peterson, Christopher, and Martin EP Seligman.  Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Vol. 1. Oxford University Press, 2004. Seligsohn, Andrew. “What does doing good mean? Well-being and the Civic Purpose of Higher Education. Well- ...

1. Achor, Shawn.
The happiness advantage: How a positive brain fuels
success in work and life. Currency, 2010.
Boothby, E. J., Clark, M. S., & Bargh, J. A. (2014). Shared
experiences are amplified.
Psychological science,
25(12), 2209-2216.
Burch, N. (1970). The four stages of competence.
Gordon Training International,
https://www.gordontraining.com/workplace-programs/
Chapter Citations:
Harro, Bobbie. “The Cycle of Socialization.”
Readings for Diversity and Social Justice, edited by
Adams, Maurianne, Warren J. Blumenfeld, D C. J. Catalano,
Keri S. DeJong, Heather Hackman, Larissa E. Hopkins, Barbara
J. Love, Madeline L. Peters, Davey Shlasko, and Ximena
Zúñiga, Routledge, 2018, pp 27-34.
Tatum, Beverly Daniel. “Who am I?”
Readings for Diversity and Social Justice, edited by
Adams, Maurianne, Warren J. Blumenfeld, D C. J. Catalano,
Keri S. DeJong, Heather Hackman, Larissa E. Hopkins, Barbara
J. Love, Madeline L. Peters, Davey Shlasko, and Ximena
Zúñiga, Routledge, 2018, pp 7-9.
Carpenter, Amanda, and Kathryn Greene. "Social penetration
theory."
The international encyclopedia of interpersonal
communication (2015): 1-4.

2. Dees, J. Gregory. "A tale of two cultures: Charity, problem
solving, and the future of social entrepreneurship."
Journal of business ethics 111.3 (2012): 321-334.
Duncan, D. (n.d.).
The Four Components of Effective Collective Impact:
Through the Lens of Assets-Based Community Development and
Results-Based Accountability. Asset-Based Community
Development Institute Report.
Defoore, William.
https://www.slideshare.net/wgdefoore/gratitude-
appreciation-optimsim 2010.
Gardner, Howard. Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple
Intelligences. New York: Basic Books, 1983. Print.
GenerationOn. “Taking Action: Four Types of Service.”
generationOn, https://s3.amazonaws.com/generationon-
production/media/uploaded-files/IPARDE-taking_action_-
_four_types_of_service_0.pdf. Accessed 1 August 2021.
Grant, A. M., & Gino, F. (2010). A little thanks goes a long
way: Explaining why gratitude expressions motivate prosocial
behavior.
Journal of personality and social psychology,
98(6), 946.
Komives, Susan R., Nance Lucas, and Timothy R. McMahon.
Exploring Leadership: For College Students Who Want
to Make a Difference. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
Kretzmann, John, and John P. McKnight. "Assets‐ based
community development."
National civic review 85.4 (1996): 23-29.

3. Peterson, Christopher, and Martin EP Seligman.
Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and
classification. Vol. 1. Oxford University Press, 2004.
Seligsohn, Andrew. “What does doing good mean? Well-being
and the Civic Purpose of Higher Education.
Well-being and Higher Education; A Strategy for
Change and the Realization of Education’s Greater Purposes,
edited by Donald W. Harward, Bringing Theory to Practice,
2016, pp.157-165.
FIN 9782. Paper/essay writing grading rubric
This rubric will be used to grade the overall quality of your
paper/essay. The understanding of each
category will be key in addressing every aspect and incorporate
them into your manuscript.
Presentation of the problem/idea/view 10 – 9 – 8 7 – 6 – 5 – 4 3
– 2 – 1 – 0
presupposing the solution
appropriate methods for motivating reader to care
about problem/idea/view)
who is affected, what is at stake); anticipates
objections of a skeptical reader who dismisses the

4. problem/idea/view
Meets all criteria
at high level; clear
and developed
Meets some
criteria; uneven;
occasionally thin;
some lapses in
clarity
Meets few
criteria; often
unclear or
undeveloped
Description of the proposed solution/idea/view 10 – 9 – 8 7 – 6
– 5 – 4 3 – 2 – 1 – 0
convinces reader that writer has done his/her
homework
Solution
/idea/view is made to seem doable

5. solution/idea/view
Meets all criteria
at high level;
clear, easy to
follow
Meets some
criteria; uneven
or has some
lapses in clarity
or development
Meets few
criteria; often
unclear or
undeveloped
Justification for proposed solution/idea/view 10 – 9 – 8 7 – 6 –
5 – 4 3 – 2 – 1 – 0
solution/idea/view; designs justification section by
imagining chief reasons for audience resistance

6. solution/idea/view
support the solution/idea/view
Meets all criteria
at high level;
clear, easy to
follow
Meets some
criteria; uneven
or has some
lapses in clarity
or development
Meets few
criteria; often
unclear or
undeveloped

7. Overall clarity of writing 10 – 9 – 8 7 – 6 – 5 – 4 3 – 2 – 1 – 0
-expectation theory (forecasting,
mapping, old/new contrast; strong organization with
topic sentences at head of paragraphs)
s in grammar, punctuation, usage, or
spelling
Meets all criteria
at high level
Meets some
criteria; uneven
Meets few criteria
Overall effectiveness of document 10 – 9 – 8 7 – 6 – 5 – 4 3 – 2
– 1 – 0
pose of calling
attention to a problem, proposing a solution, and

8. giving strong reasons for acting on the
solution/idea/view
audience if sent in present form
favorable
impression of the writer’s professional motives, and
good will
Ready to submit
with only minor
revisions/edits
Good potential
but
some/significant
revision or
editing still
needed
Back to the
drawing board