This document appears to be notes from reviewing video footage, with each entry containing the duration of the clip, the camera angle or type of shot, and a brief comment on the quality or issues. There are over 30 separate clips reviewed with a mix of positive and negative feedback provided on aspects like stability, composition, acting, and continuity between shots. The clips range from close-ups to long shots and cover interactions between multiple actors.

1. Duration
Type
11
behind
10
behind
1
mid shot
quality
8
comment
good
can use as a good match on action
bad
shaky
bad
mid shot
shaky and not long enough
bad
8
zoom to close up
9
zoom to mid shot
15
long shot
actor falls over
ok
good
good
bit shaky
got still shot of all 4 girls
very long needs cropping
10
mid shot
bad
bad continuity
8
hidden shot
bad
rule of thirds

2. 6
close up
5
close up
16
long shot
10
mid
8
mid
Invalid
actors laugh
bad
low angle
16
bad
good
bad
good
bad
too close
connects well to other clips
lens was fuzzy and unclear
bit shaky
out of proportion

3. 5
close up
5
close up
5
bad
bad
ECU
good
bad acting
bad acting
very well presented.
Invalid
10
10
4
?
? camera was on in bad
mid shot
hidden shot
good
zoom follows voices
good
well composed

4. invalid
10
7
10
long shot
close up
establishing shot
good
well acted
goodGood panning
good
good hidden
invalid
8
Invalid
low angle mid shot
good
very stable

5. 5
hidden shot
good
good focus use
10
mid shot
good
conversation
“
“
5
33
“
“
“
“
“
“
shot reverse shot
good
shot reverse shot
5
mid
good
bad
actors laugh