https://lawyerfrommexico.com/immigration-attorney-portland/ Immigration Attorney Portland. On Thursday, the United States Supreme Court officially rejected a bid by the Trump administration to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA. This program is designed to protect undocumented immigrants who were brought to the country as children, also know as Dreamers, and protects nearly 700 young individuals allowing them to work, study and remain in the US on a renewable permit .

1. Immigration Attorney Portland
U.S. Supreme Court Blocks Trump’s Attempt
To End DACA
Immigration Attorney Portland. On Thursday, the United States
Supreme Court officially rejected a bid by the Trump administration
to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA. This
program is designed to protect undocumented immigrants who
were brought to the country as children, also know as Dreamers,
and protects nearly 700 young individuals allowing them to work,
study and remain in the US on a renewable permit . The Chief
Justice John G. Roberts wrote the 5 – 4 majority decision, in which
he stated that President Trump and his administration had failed to
provide any proper legal justification for putting an end to the
program:
“The dispute before the court is not whether DHS (Department of
Homeland Security) may rescind DACA. All parties agree that it may.
The dispute is instead primarily about the procedure the agency

2. followed in doing so. We address only whether the DHS complied
with the procedural requirement that it provide a reasoned
explanation for its action. Here the agency failed to consider the
conspicuous issues of whether to retain forbearance and what if
anything to do about the hardship to DACA recipients. That dual
failure raises doubts about whether the agency appreciated the
scope of its discretion or exercised that discretion in a reasonable
manner”.
Quoting from briefs in the case, Roberts wrote, “Since 2012, DACA
recipients have enrolled in degree programs, embarked on careers,
started businesses, purchased homes, and even married and had
children, all in reliance on the program. The consequences of the
rescission, [advocates] emphasize, would ‘radiate outward’ to DACA
recipients’ families, including their 200,000 U.S.-citizen children, to
the schools where DACA recipients study and teach, and to the
employers who have invested time and money in training them. In
addition, DACA recipients from the lawful labor force may, they tell
us, result in the loss of $215 billion in economic activity and an
associated $60 billion in federal tax revenue over the next ten
years.”
The DACA program was originally implemented by President Barack
Obama back in the year 2012 after a congressional attempt at
comprehensive immigration reform had failed. When Trump first
entered office, his original attorney general, Jeff Sessions, advised
his administration to put an end to the program by saying that it
was illegal. However, this advice was something that many lower
courts determined to be questionable, at most, as they felt that the
DHS failed to properly weigh how ending DACA would affect those
who relied on the program’s protections against being deported, as
well as the ability to be able to legally work in the United States.
Roberts was joined by fellow Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen
G. Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan in making the
majority decision, while Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch,
Samuel Alito, Jr., and Brett Kavanaugh opposed.
The ruling was another big loss for the Trump administration in the
same week, as the Supreme Court also ruled that the federal Civil
Rights Act of 1964 protected LGBTQ individuals from discrimination
within workplace environments, something that Trump disagreed

3. with, as the administration’s opinion was that it only applied to
discrimination against men and women.
It is also similar to a ruling that was made during the court’s
previous term in which Roberts and the liberal Justices blocked
Trump and his administration from adding a controversial question
regarding citizenship to the 2020 Census, citing that the
administration failed to offer the exact reason as to why they
required such information, as well as not following proper
procedure.
California Attorney General Xavier Becerra (D), leading a coalition of
20 states and the District of Columbia bringing the challenge,
mentioned that ending DACA “would have been cruel to the
hundreds of thousands of Dreamers who call America home, and it
would have been bad for our nation’s health.”and that Congress
should “permanently fix our broken immigration system and secure
a pathway to citizenship.”
Obama also Tweeted: “Eight years ago this week, we protected
young people who were raised as part of our American family from
deportation. Today, I’m happy for them, their families, and all of us.
We may look different and come from everywhere, but what makes
us American are our shared ideals.”
In the meantime, upcoming decisions from the Supreme Court
include the following:
*Decisions regarding Trump’s longtime legal fight to keep his
financial records shielded from
Congress and a New York-based prosecutor.
*Multiple cases involving the separation of church and state.
*The court’s first reexamination of abortion rights since Trump’s
first two nominees to the court were confirmed.
Immigration Attorney Texas/Portland. If you are a DACA recipient
or are looking to benefit from or qualify for DACA we can help
you. Contact us today for a free consultation.