SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 5
( I just need this rewritten in your words)
sSummary
In their book, Misreading Scripture with Western Eyes:
Removing Cultural Blinders to Better Understand the Bible, E.
Randolph Richards and Brandon J. O’Brien set out to warn
Westerners about the fallacy of reading Scripture with cultural
blinders that may prevent them from realizing the meaning of
what the author was conveying to his original audience. The
authors identify nine key factors that cause Westerners and non-
Westerners to interpret the Bible differently. Those factors are
mores, race and ethnicity, language, individualism and
collectivism, honor/shame and right/wrong, time, rules and
relationships, virtue and vice, and finding the center of God’s
will. They break the book down into three sections and use
images of icebergs to help explain their claims. The three
iceberg images are as follows; (1) In the first three chapters the
authors describe the obvious cultural issues as being surface
level glaciers, (2) The next three chapters are on less obvious
cultural issues and are compared to glaciers that are below the
surface but noticeable if looked for, and (3) The last three
chapters describe the cultural issues that are not obvious at all
and are like glaciers deep below the surface. The authors are
convinced that without understanding these cultural differences
it is unlikely that readers are able to correctly interpret
Scripture. Richards and O’Brien share personal testimonies of
their own cross-cultural experiences and observations in
addition to biblical and historical data to help readers relate to
what they are attempting to communicate.
Analysis
Richards and O’Brien have put together an incredibly effective
tool to help anyone learn how to interpret Scripture going
against cultural preunderstandings or presuppositions. I find
that I can only offer a positive critique on this piece of work.
The offering of personal examples as well as many examples
from Scripture itself kept me intrigued and eager to read more.
There is a wealth of helpful knowledge that is presented in this
text. Richards and O’Brien begin the book by bringing to light
that readers come to the table with certain mores. They define
mores as, “folkways of central importance accepted without
question and embodying the fundamental moral views of a
group.” These mores could lead us to the wrong conclusion of a
text if there is not an understanding of the culture of the author.
For example, consider the topic of money for a moment. The
authors went into detail on just how different Westerners
understand wealth compared to non-Westerners. They explained
how Westerners view wealth as something that is available to
anyone who works hard enough and for those who are lacking it
is because they are lazy and how that is much different from
how non-Westerners view wealth. They clarified this by saying,
“There is only so much money to be had, so if one person has a
lot of it, then everyone else has less to divide among
themselves.” This, along with several other examples of words
that have different concepts between Westerners and non-
Westerners, helped me to remember to be intentional on first
understanding cultural mores before attempting to interpret the
Scripture.
The authors did a fantastic job of bringing awareness to
cultural differences between Westerners and non-Westerners
without being biased towards either. They simply explained in
great detail that without acknowledging and learning what those
differences are we set ourselves up to misunderstand one
another and therefore we will misunderstand Scripture. Both
authors make this claim explicitly without any excuse. The
method of breaking down the cultural differences into three
levels of glaciers was masterful. This is a great visual and a
powerful tool for the practical learners. Although I understood
that my preconceived notions might inhibit me from correctly
interpreting biblical and historical teachings, I did not realize
the depth of this before reading this text. Now with the
teachings and awareness brought forth from Richards and
O’Brien, I know that I will be more intentional on
understanding the author’s culture before trying to interpret heir
writings.
I found chapter five to be one of the more intriguing chapters
in the book. In this chapter, Richards and O’Brien tackle the
differences between a right/wrong culture (Westerners) and a
honor/shame culture (non-Westerners). I too have experienced
this through my travels to Central Asia and working with
Chechens there. They use these differences as another piece of
evidence demonstrating how we cannot correctly interpret
Scripture without understanding the cultural differences. The
authors said this concerning a Western view of right and wrong,
“Our point is that our decisions to act rightly are not necessarily
made with other people in mind-to please others, for example-
but on the basis of an objective and largely individual sense of
right and wrong.” As the chapter continues they define the
honor/shame culture that is found in non-Western cultures. “In
shame cultures, people are more likely to choose right behavior
on the basis of what society expects from them.” A family
name is a virtue that is highly regarded and
honored in non-Western cultures. To shame your family name
would be devastating to the entire family.
Richards and O’Brien presented a powerful case against
attempting to interpret Scripture before learning about the
culture from whom the Scriptures were written to and from.
They bring enough evidence to demonstrate how the differing
cultures can lead to differing interpretations but only one can be
correct. Their argument is clear and to the point. It is presented
without adding unnecessary verbiage to try and convince their
readers of their opinion or by watering down their main points
with an overload of general information. The flow of the book
is well thought out and masterfully delivered. I found their work
to be free of contradictions or inconsistencies that would cause
their readers to question their claims. For only having nine
chapters and a little more than two hundred pages, this book can
equip readers as well as many others books of this nature that
are twice as long.
Conclusion
It is important to understand that the only way we can truly
understand God’s Word is through the power of the Holy Spirit.
John writes, “But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father
will send in my name, he will teach you all things and bring to
your remembrance all that I have said to you” (John 14:26,
ESV). Then, with the help of the Holy Spirit, we should be
diligent in seeking out other resources and tools to help us dig
deeper. Misreading Scripture with Western Eyes by E. Randolph
Richards and Brandon J. O’Brien is a must read for all students
of the Bible. No matter what type of position one may hold,
whether it be in serving in the ministry as a full-time vocation
or being a layperson teaching Sunday school classes, this book
will bring them great insight
into God’s Word. No matter or what level of understanding they
may have of the Bible, this would serve as a valuable resource.
When it comes to seeking God and understanding his Word, we
can never have too many tools or too much understanding.
Proverb’s speak to the importance of seeking understanding,
“The beginning of wisdom is this: Get wisdom, and whatever
you get, get insight” (Proverbs 4:7, ESV). By furthering our
understanding of God’s Word, and by learning more about the
different cultures and people groups that God has created, we
can then better fulfill our purpose in life of loving God and
loving others.
Bibliography
Richards, E. Randolph, and Brandon J. O'Brien. Misreading
Scripture with Western
Eyes: Removing Cultural Blinders to Better Understand the
Bible. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Books, 2012.

More Related Content

More from kendalfarrier

More from kendalfarrier (20)

Explain which HRIS types your current or previous employer uti.docx
Explain which HRIS types your current or previous employer uti.docxExplain which HRIS types your current or previous employer uti.docx
Explain which HRIS types your current or previous employer uti.docx
 
Explain whether you believe it is U.S. consumers or policy makers wh.docx
Explain whether you believe it is U.S. consumers or policy makers wh.docxExplain whether you believe it is U.S. consumers or policy makers wh.docx
Explain whether you believe it is U.S. consumers or policy makers wh.docx
 
Explain whether psychotherapy has a biological basis. Explain how cu.docx
Explain whether psychotherapy has a biological basis. Explain how cu.docxExplain whether psychotherapy has a biological basis. Explain how cu.docx
Explain whether psychotherapy has a biological basis. Explain how cu.docx
 
Explain what the textbook author says about each theme present. Pr.docx
Explain what the textbook author says about each theme present. Pr.docxExplain what the textbook author says about each theme present. Pr.docx
Explain what the textbook author says about each theme present. Pr.docx
 
Explain what should qualify as global leadership considering the dep.docx
Explain what should qualify as global leadership considering the dep.docxExplain what should qualify as global leadership considering the dep.docx
Explain what should qualify as global leadership considering the dep.docx
 
Explain what is mean by media planning and how advertisers decide .docx
Explain what is mean by media planning and how advertisers decide .docxExplain what is mean by media planning and how advertisers decide .docx
Explain what is mean by media planning and how advertisers decide .docx
 
Explain what communication barriers are, then describe a situation t.docx
Explain what communication barriers are, then describe a situation t.docxExplain what communication barriers are, then describe a situation t.docx
Explain what communication barriers are, then describe a situation t.docx
 
Explain what areas a forensic psychology professional may like.docx
Explain what areas a forensic psychology professional may like.docxExplain what areas a forensic psychology professional may like.docx
Explain what areas a forensic psychology professional may like.docx
 
Explain two major differences between common-sense understandings an.docx
Explain two major differences between common-sense understandings an.docxExplain two major differences between common-sense understandings an.docx
Explain two major differences between common-sense understandings an.docx
 
Explain three forces leading companies to pursue international ope.docx
Explain three forces leading companies to pursue international ope.docxExplain three forces leading companies to pursue international ope.docx
Explain three forces leading companies to pursue international ope.docx
 
Explain the various forms of social engineering tactics that hackers.docx
Explain the various forms of social engineering tactics that hackers.docxExplain the various forms of social engineering tactics that hackers.docx
Explain the various forms of social engineering tactics that hackers.docx
 
Explain the two major types of bias. Identify a peer-reviewed epidem.docx
Explain the two major types of bias. Identify a peer-reviewed epidem.docxExplain the two major types of bias. Identify a peer-reviewed epidem.docx
Explain the two major types of bias. Identify a peer-reviewed epidem.docx
 
Explain the users role in an OS.Explain the differences b.docx
Explain the users role in an OS.Explain the differences b.docxExplain the users role in an OS.Explain the differences b.docx
Explain the users role in an OS.Explain the differences b.docx
 
Explain the tone and figurative language in the following paragraph..docx
Explain the tone and figurative language in the following paragraph..docxExplain the tone and figurative language in the following paragraph..docx
Explain the tone and figurative language in the following paragraph..docx
 
Explain the suicide-related forensic assessment procedures uti.docx
Explain the suicide-related forensic assessment procedures uti.docxExplain the suicide-related forensic assessment procedures uti.docx
Explain the suicide-related forensic assessment procedures uti.docx
 
Explain the sociological perspective on race How is it different th.docx
Explain the sociological perspective on race How is it different th.docxExplain the sociological perspective on race How is it different th.docx
Explain the sociological perspective on race How is it different th.docx
 
explain the significance of Umayyad al-Andalus and the main feat.docx
explain the significance of Umayyad al-Andalus and the main feat.docxexplain the significance of Umayyad al-Andalus and the main feat.docx
explain the significance of Umayyad al-Andalus and the main feat.docx
 
Explain the similarities and differences between vicarious trauma .docx
Explain the similarities and differences between vicarious trauma .docxExplain the similarities and differences between vicarious trauma .docx
Explain the similarities and differences between vicarious trauma .docx
 
Explain the role of the community health nurse in partnership with.docx
Explain the role of the community health nurse in partnership with.docxExplain the role of the community health nurse in partnership with.docx
Explain the role of the community health nurse in partnership with.docx
 
Explain the Routine Activities Theory (Cohen & Felson, 1979) and the.docx
Explain the Routine Activities Theory (Cohen & Felson, 1979) and the.docxExplain the Routine Activities Theory (Cohen & Felson, 1979) and the.docx
Explain the Routine Activities Theory (Cohen & Felson, 1979) and the.docx
 

( I just need this rewritten in your words)sSummaryIn thei

  • 1. ( I just need this rewritten in your words) sSummary In their book, Misreading Scripture with Western Eyes: Removing Cultural Blinders to Better Understand the Bible, E. Randolph Richards and Brandon J. O’Brien set out to warn Westerners about the fallacy of reading Scripture with cultural blinders that may prevent them from realizing the meaning of what the author was conveying to his original audience. The authors identify nine key factors that cause Westerners and non- Westerners to interpret the Bible differently. Those factors are mores, race and ethnicity, language, individualism and collectivism, honor/shame and right/wrong, time, rules and relationships, virtue and vice, and finding the center of God’s will. They break the book down into three sections and use images of icebergs to help explain their claims. The three iceberg images are as follows; (1) In the first three chapters the authors describe the obvious cultural issues as being surface level glaciers, (2) The next three chapters are on less obvious cultural issues and are compared to glaciers that are below the surface but noticeable if looked for, and (3) The last three chapters describe the cultural issues that are not obvious at all and are like glaciers deep below the surface. The authors are convinced that without understanding these cultural differences it is unlikely that readers are able to correctly interpret Scripture. Richards and O’Brien share personal testimonies of their own cross-cultural experiences and observations in addition to biblical and historical data to help readers relate to what they are attempting to communicate. Analysis Richards and O’Brien have put together an incredibly effective
  • 2. tool to help anyone learn how to interpret Scripture going against cultural preunderstandings or presuppositions. I find that I can only offer a positive critique on this piece of work. The offering of personal examples as well as many examples from Scripture itself kept me intrigued and eager to read more. There is a wealth of helpful knowledge that is presented in this text. Richards and O’Brien begin the book by bringing to light that readers come to the table with certain mores. They define mores as, “folkways of central importance accepted without question and embodying the fundamental moral views of a group.” These mores could lead us to the wrong conclusion of a text if there is not an understanding of the culture of the author. For example, consider the topic of money for a moment. The authors went into detail on just how different Westerners understand wealth compared to non-Westerners. They explained how Westerners view wealth as something that is available to anyone who works hard enough and for those who are lacking it is because they are lazy and how that is much different from how non-Westerners view wealth. They clarified this by saying, “There is only so much money to be had, so if one person has a lot of it, then everyone else has less to divide among themselves.” This, along with several other examples of words that have different concepts between Westerners and non- Westerners, helped me to remember to be intentional on first understanding cultural mores before attempting to interpret the Scripture. The authors did a fantastic job of bringing awareness to cultural differences between Westerners and non-Westerners without being biased towards either. They simply explained in great detail that without acknowledging and learning what those differences are we set ourselves up to misunderstand one another and therefore we will misunderstand Scripture. Both authors make this claim explicitly without any excuse. The
  • 3. method of breaking down the cultural differences into three levels of glaciers was masterful. This is a great visual and a powerful tool for the practical learners. Although I understood that my preconceived notions might inhibit me from correctly interpreting biblical and historical teachings, I did not realize the depth of this before reading this text. Now with the teachings and awareness brought forth from Richards and O’Brien, I know that I will be more intentional on understanding the author’s culture before trying to interpret heir writings. I found chapter five to be one of the more intriguing chapters in the book. In this chapter, Richards and O’Brien tackle the differences between a right/wrong culture (Westerners) and a honor/shame culture (non-Westerners). I too have experienced this through my travels to Central Asia and working with Chechens there. They use these differences as another piece of evidence demonstrating how we cannot correctly interpret Scripture without understanding the cultural differences. The authors said this concerning a Western view of right and wrong, “Our point is that our decisions to act rightly are not necessarily made with other people in mind-to please others, for example- but on the basis of an objective and largely individual sense of right and wrong.” As the chapter continues they define the honor/shame culture that is found in non-Western cultures. “In shame cultures, people are more likely to choose right behavior on the basis of what society expects from them.” A family name is a virtue that is highly regarded and honored in non-Western cultures. To shame your family name would be devastating to the entire family. Richards and O’Brien presented a powerful case against attempting to interpret Scripture before learning about the culture from whom the Scriptures were written to and from. They bring enough evidence to demonstrate how the differing
  • 4. cultures can lead to differing interpretations but only one can be correct. Their argument is clear and to the point. It is presented without adding unnecessary verbiage to try and convince their readers of their opinion or by watering down their main points with an overload of general information. The flow of the book is well thought out and masterfully delivered. I found their work to be free of contradictions or inconsistencies that would cause their readers to question their claims. For only having nine chapters and a little more than two hundred pages, this book can equip readers as well as many others books of this nature that are twice as long. Conclusion It is important to understand that the only way we can truly understand God’s Word is through the power of the Holy Spirit. John writes, “But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, he will teach you all things and bring to your remembrance all that I have said to you” (John 14:26, ESV). Then, with the help of the Holy Spirit, we should be diligent in seeking out other resources and tools to help us dig deeper. Misreading Scripture with Western Eyes by E. Randolph Richards and Brandon J. O’Brien is a must read for all students of the Bible. No matter what type of position one may hold, whether it be in serving in the ministry as a full-time vocation or being a layperson teaching Sunday school classes, this book will bring them great insight into God’s Word. No matter or what level of understanding they may have of the Bible, this would serve as a valuable resource. When it comes to seeking God and understanding his Word, we can never have too many tools or too much understanding. Proverb’s speak to the importance of seeking understanding, “The beginning of wisdom is this: Get wisdom, and whatever you get, get insight” (Proverbs 4:7, ESV). By furthering our understanding of God’s Word, and by learning more about the
  • 5. different cultures and people groups that God has created, we can then better fulfill our purpose in life of loving God and loving others. Bibliography Richards, E. Randolph, and Brandon J. O'Brien. Misreading Scripture with Western Eyes: Removing Cultural Blinders to Better Understand the Bible. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Books, 2012.