SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 10
US Case Law Project
Joe Gadaleta
College business law
Brown v. Board
Linda Brown and her sister had to walk a far way to their bus stop when
there was a closer school to their house. They wanted to be able to go
to that school but schools were segregated. They want to court to get
the schools unsegregated and took it to the supreme court.
The defense said that the schools were equal in busing, buildings, and
the teachers so there was no reason to make the schools unsegregated.
The Supreme Court decided that segregated schools were not equal
and that kids needed a proper education. The 14th amendment was
used in this case did show that segregated schools are unconstitutional.
Miranda v. Arizona
Ernesto Miranda was Mexican immigrant who was arrested after being
chosen in a police line up. He was charged for rape and kidnaping and
was interrogated for 2 hours.
The police said they never read him his rights because he was arrested
before and they said them to him then.
The court decided in favor of Miranda and that everyone needs their
rights to be told to them like that they have the right to remain silent
and the right to an attorney. The 5th and 6th amendments were used
because those were the ones not read to Miranda when he was
arrested.
Mapp v Ohio
The police illegally searched her house without a warrant and in areas
of the house that did not pertain to the suspected bomber.
The defense said that cause it was searched without force it was legal
but if her house was searched with force it would’ve been illegal.
The court ruled against mapp and let the ohio courts make a decision.
In another case the 14th amendment did not prevent the admission of
evidence claimed by an illegal search and seizure.

More Related Content

What's hot

Bill of rights work sheet academic
Bill of rights work sheet academicBill of rights work sheet academic
Bill of rights work sheet academicFredrick Smith
 
Mapp v. ohio
Mapp v. ohioMapp v. ohio
Mapp v. ohioJ153770
 
Mapp v ohioo
Mapp v ohiooMapp v ohioo
Mapp v ohiooshleee16
 
Xavier woodson civil liberties project
Xavier woodson civil liberties projectXavier woodson civil liberties project
Xavier woodson civil liberties projectxavier25arkansasstate
 
New Jersey V T L O Powerpoint
New Jersey V  T L O  PowerpointNew Jersey V  T L O  Powerpoint
New Jersey V T L O PowerpointTodd Beach
 
2.1 day 4 ppt
2.1 day 4 ppt2.1 day 4 ppt
2.1 day 4 pptbravogths
 
C:\Fakepath\New J V Tlo
C:\Fakepath\New J V TloC:\Fakepath\New J V Tlo
C:\Fakepath\New J V TloTodd Beach
 
Lesson 1 ppt
Lesson 1 pptLesson 1 ppt
Lesson 1 pptmworth
 
GRPS Student Search & Seizure
 GRPS Student Search & Seizure  GRPS Student Search & Seizure
GRPS Student Search & Seizure zorro2
 
Business law ezra and aidan
Business law ezra and aidanBusiness law ezra and aidan
Business law ezra and aidanAidanK94
 
Brown v. Board of Education
Brown v. Board of EducationBrown v. Board of Education
Brown v. Board of Educationajc17
 
Miranda v. Arizona Landmark U.S. Supreme Court Case
Miranda v. Arizona Landmark U.S. Supreme Court CaseMiranda v. Arizona Landmark U.S. Supreme Court Case
Miranda v. Arizona Landmark U.S. Supreme Court Casenoah james
 
NJ v. T.L.O.
NJ v. T.L.O.NJ v. T.L.O.
NJ v. T.L.O.dkrull
 

What's hot (18)

Law Project
Law ProjectLaw Project
Law Project
 
Bill of rights work sheet academic
Bill of rights work sheet academicBill of rights work sheet academic
Bill of rights work sheet academic
 
Mapp v. ohio
Mapp v. ohioMapp v. ohio
Mapp v. ohio
 
US Case Law
US Case LawUS Case Law
US Case Law
 
Mapp v ohioo
Mapp v ohiooMapp v ohioo
Mapp v ohioo
 
Xavier woodson civil liberties project
Xavier woodson civil liberties projectXavier woodson civil liberties project
Xavier woodson civil liberties project
 
New Jersey V T L O Powerpoint
New Jersey V  T L O  PowerpointNew Jersey V  T L O  Powerpoint
New Jersey V T L O Powerpoint
 
US case law project
US case law projectUS case law project
US case law project
 
2.1 day 4 ppt
2.1 day 4 ppt2.1 day 4 ppt
2.1 day 4 ppt
 
C:\Fakepath\New J V Tlo
C:\Fakepath\New J V TloC:\Fakepath\New J V Tlo
C:\Fakepath\New J V Tlo
 
Lesson 1 ppt
Lesson 1 pptLesson 1 ppt
Lesson 1 ppt
 
GRPS Student Search & Seizure
 GRPS Student Search & Seizure  GRPS Student Search & Seizure
GRPS Student Search & Seizure
 
Business law ezra and aidan
Business law ezra and aidanBusiness law ezra and aidan
Business law ezra and aidan
 
Brown v. Board of Education
Brown v. Board of EducationBrown v. Board of Education
Brown v. Board of Education
 
U.S. IMMIGRATION ALERT: KNOW YOUR RIGHTS: EVERY ONE HAS CERTAIN BASIC RIGHTS,...
U.S. IMMIGRATION ALERT: KNOW YOUR RIGHTS: EVERY ONE HAS CERTAIN BASIC RIGHTS,...U.S. IMMIGRATION ALERT: KNOW YOUR RIGHTS: EVERY ONE HAS CERTAIN BASIC RIGHTS,...
U.S. IMMIGRATION ALERT: KNOW YOUR RIGHTS: EVERY ONE HAS CERTAIN BASIC RIGHTS,...
 
Police powers
Police powersPolice powers
Police powers
 
Miranda v. Arizona Landmark U.S. Supreme Court Case
Miranda v. Arizona Landmark U.S. Supreme Court CaseMiranda v. Arizona Landmark U.S. Supreme Court Case
Miranda v. Arizona Landmark U.S. Supreme Court Case
 
NJ v. T.L.O.
NJ v. T.L.O.NJ v. T.L.O.
NJ v. T.L.O.
 

Similar to Us case law project

Miranda v arizona (1966)
Miranda v arizona (1966)Miranda v arizona (1966)
Miranda v arizona (1966)l200407
 
Miranda v arizona (1966)
Miranda v arizona (1966)Miranda v arizona (1966)
Miranda v arizona (1966)l200407
 
Miranda v arizona (1966)
Miranda v arizona (1966)Miranda v arizona (1966)
Miranda v arizona (1966)l200407
 
Miranda v arizona (1966)
Miranda v arizona (1966)Miranda v arizona (1966)
Miranda v arizona (1966)l200407
 
Miranda v arizona (1966)
Miranda v arizona (1966)Miranda v arizona (1966)
Miranda v arizona (1966)l200407
 
Us case law prodject
Us case law prodjectUs case law prodject
Us case law prodjectchristian116
 
Miranda v arizona (1966)
Miranda v arizona (1966)Miranda v arizona (1966)
Miranda v arizona (1966)l200407
 
Miranda v arizona (1966)
Miranda v arizona (1966)Miranda v arizona (1966)
Miranda v arizona (1966)l200407
 
Miranda v arizona (1966)
Miranda v arizona (1966)Miranda v arizona (1966)
Miranda v arizona (1966)l200407
 
Miranda v arizona (1966)
Miranda v arizona (1966)Miranda v arizona (1966)
Miranda v arizona (1966)l200407
 
Miranda v. arizona
Miranda v. arizonaMiranda v. arizona
Miranda v. arizonadrumeo713
 
Miranda v. arizona
Miranda v. arizonaMiranda v. arizona
Miranda v. arizonadrumeo713
 
Plessy 1Plessy v. Ferguson and Miranda .docx
Plessy      1Plessy v. Ferguson and Miranda .docxPlessy      1Plessy v. Ferguson and Miranda .docx
Plessy 1Plessy v. Ferguson and Miranda .docxLeilaniPoolsy
 
Joe's Civics project
Joe's Civics projectJoe's Civics project
Joe's Civics projectSally Witt
 
US Land Mark Cases- Michael Alfano
US Land Mark Cases- Michael AlfanoUS Land Mark Cases- Michael Alfano
US Land Mark Cases- Michael Alfanomikealfano49
 

Similar to Us case law project (16)

Buisness Law Project
Buisness Law ProjectBuisness Law Project
Buisness Law Project
 
Miranda v arizona (1966)
Miranda v arizona (1966)Miranda v arizona (1966)
Miranda v arizona (1966)
 
Miranda v arizona (1966)
Miranda v arizona (1966)Miranda v arizona (1966)
Miranda v arizona (1966)
 
Miranda v arizona (1966)
Miranda v arizona (1966)Miranda v arizona (1966)
Miranda v arizona (1966)
 
Miranda v arizona (1966)
Miranda v arizona (1966)Miranda v arizona (1966)
Miranda v arizona (1966)
 
Miranda v arizona (1966)
Miranda v arizona (1966)Miranda v arizona (1966)
Miranda v arizona (1966)
 
Us case law prodject
Us case law prodjectUs case law prodject
Us case law prodject
 
Miranda v arizona (1966)
Miranda v arizona (1966)Miranda v arizona (1966)
Miranda v arizona (1966)
 
Miranda v arizona (1966)
Miranda v arizona (1966)Miranda v arizona (1966)
Miranda v arizona (1966)
 
Miranda v arizona (1966)
Miranda v arizona (1966)Miranda v arizona (1966)
Miranda v arizona (1966)
 
Miranda v arizona (1966)
Miranda v arizona (1966)Miranda v arizona (1966)
Miranda v arizona (1966)
 
Miranda v. arizona
Miranda v. arizonaMiranda v. arizona
Miranda v. arizona
 
Miranda v. arizona
Miranda v. arizonaMiranda v. arizona
Miranda v. arizona
 
Plessy 1Plessy v. Ferguson and Miranda .docx
Plessy      1Plessy v. Ferguson and Miranda .docxPlessy      1Plessy v. Ferguson and Miranda .docx
Plessy 1Plessy v. Ferguson and Miranda .docx
 
Joe's Civics project
Joe's Civics projectJoe's Civics project
Joe's Civics project
 
US Land Mark Cases- Michael Alfano
US Land Mark Cases- Michael AlfanoUS Land Mark Cases- Michael Alfano
US Land Mark Cases- Michael Alfano
 

Us case law project

  • 1. US Case Law Project Joe Gadaleta College business law
  • 2. Brown v. Board Linda Brown and her sister had to walk a far way to their bus stop when there was a closer school to their house. They wanted to be able to go to that school but schools were segregated. They want to court to get the schools unsegregated and took it to the supreme court.
  • 3. The defense said that the schools were equal in busing, buildings, and the teachers so there was no reason to make the schools unsegregated.
  • 4. The Supreme Court decided that segregated schools were not equal and that kids needed a proper education. The 14th amendment was used in this case did show that segregated schools are unconstitutional.
  • 5. Miranda v. Arizona Ernesto Miranda was Mexican immigrant who was arrested after being chosen in a police line up. He was charged for rape and kidnaping and was interrogated for 2 hours.
  • 6. The police said they never read him his rights because he was arrested before and they said them to him then.
  • 7. The court decided in favor of Miranda and that everyone needs their rights to be told to them like that they have the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney. The 5th and 6th amendments were used because those were the ones not read to Miranda when he was arrested.
  • 8. Mapp v Ohio The police illegally searched her house without a warrant and in areas of the house that did not pertain to the suspected bomber.
  • 9. The defense said that cause it was searched without force it was legal but if her house was searched with force it would’ve been illegal.
  • 10. The court ruled against mapp and let the ohio courts make a decision. In another case the 14th amendment did not prevent the admission of evidence claimed by an illegal search and seizure.