ombudsman service complaint

1. 0UV 0DUJDUHW -RQHV
$UGHQ 6WUHHW
KDGGHUWRQ
2OGKDP
*UHDWHU 0DQFKHVWHU
2/ -'
2XU UHI
WK $SULO
'HDU 0UV -RQHV
7KDQN RX IRU RXU HPDLO ZKLFK ZH UHFHLYHG RQ $SULO LQ UHJDUGV WR FDVH UHIHUHQFH
:H GR QRW FRQVLGHU LW UHDVRQDEOH WKDW RX UDLVH D FRPSODLQW DERXW RXU VHUYLFH DOPRVW PRQWKV
DIWHU RX VWDWH WKH LVVXHV DURVH :H VXJJHVW WKDW LI RX ZHUH XQKDSS ZLWK RXU VHUYLFH RX
VKRXOG KDYH UDLVHG RXU FRPSODLQW PXFK HDUOLHU
7KHUHIRUH ZH FRQVLGHU WKDW RXU FRPSODLQW LV YH[DWLRXV DQG DV VXFK , WUXVW RX ZLOO DSSUHFLDWH
RXU GHFLVLRQ QRW WR DFFHSW LW IRU LQYHVWLJDWLRQ
6KRXOG RX FRQWLQXH WR FRUUHVSRQG DERXW WKLV PDWWHU ZH ZLOO KDYH QR RSWLRQ EXW WR LQYRNH RXU
8QDFFHSWDEOH $FWLRQV 3ROLF ZKLFK , KDYH DWWDFKHG IRU RXU LQIRUPDWLRQ
RXUV VLQFHUHO
5HEHFFD %XWWOH
XVWRPHU 5HODWLRQV

2. 0UV 0DUJDUHW -RQHV
$UGHQ 6WUHHW
KDGGHUWRQ
2OGKDP
*UHDWHU 0DQFKHVWHU
2/ -'
2XU UHI
UG 6HSWHPEHU
'HDU 0UV -RQHV
7KDQN RX IRU RXU HPDLO ZKLFK ZH UHFHLYHG RQ 6HSWHPEHU
$V RX DUH VWLOO XQKDSS ZLWK DVSHFWV RI RXU VHUYLFH RXU FRPSODLQW ZLOO QRZ EH SDVVHG WR 6LPRQ
0RUULV 'HSXW KLHI ([HFXWLYH DV SHU WKH QH[W VWDJH RI RXU FRPSODLQWV SURFHVV
0U 0RUULV ZLOO DLP WR UHVSRQG WR RXU FRPSODLQW ZLWKLQ WKH QH[W ZRUNLQJ GDV LQ OLQH ZLWK RXU
FRPSODLQWV SURFHGXUH VR RX VKRXOG H[SHFW WR KHDU IURP KLP E 6HSWHPEHU
RXUV VLQFHUHO
-R *LEVRQ
XVWRPHU 5HODWLRQV

3. 0UV 0DUJDUHW -RQHV
$UGHQ 6WUHHW
KDGGHUWRQ
2OGKDP
*UHDWHU 0DQFKHVWHU
2/ -'
2XU UHI
WK 6HSWHPEHU
'HDU 0UV -RQHV
3OHDVH ILQG DWWDFKHG D UHVSRQVH IURP 6LPRQ 0RUULV UHJDUGLQJ RXU FRPSODLQW DERXW
2PEXGVPDQ 6HUYLFHV
RXUV VLQFHUHO
5RE 6HGGRQ
XVWRPHU 5HODWLRQV

4. Mrs Case ref: 1085439
10 September 2015
Dear Mrs
Thank you for your correspondence in relation to your complaint about our service.
I note that Rebecca wrote to you in May 2015 in response to your complaint. You have replied to
advise that you remain dissatisfied. You say that you feel we should look at your complaint
about Ombudsman Services’ failure to respond to your correspondence about First Utility in
June 2014 and that the delay in bringing the complaint to us should not prevent you from
complaining.
On reviewing your case, I can see that you first contacted us about your complaint with First
Utility in May 2014. We replied to you and asked for some more information about the complaint.
In July 2014 James Miller wrote to you and explained that the ombudsman was considering
whether or not to accept your complaints about Sky and First Utility for investigation. In October
2014 we wrote to you to say the ombudsman had decided not to accept your complaints for
investigation. As such, we did not enter into further correspondence regarding your complaint
about First Utility.
We did not hear from you again about this case until April 2015. Following Rebecca’s response
in May 2015, we did not hear from you again until September 2015 when you asked to escalate
your claim that we failed to respond to you in June 2014.
Given the above facts I am satisfied that we explained our position to you in October 2014.
Therefore, I do not uphold your complaint about Ombudsman Services. I hope that my
explanation will help to resolve matters. I also hope you will appreciate that it would not be
appropriate for the service to enter into further correspondence on this matter.
Yours sincerely,
Simon Morris

5. Deputy Chief Executive