This document discusses key aspects of the Tax Administration Act (TAA) in South Africa, including balancing the powers of the South African Revenue Service (SARS) and taxpayer rights. It notes SARS' powers to gather information and enforce tax laws, and corresponding taxpayer rights to limit information requests, protection against self-incrimination, and dispute resolution processes. The document outlines chapters of the TAA covering tax administration procedures, recovery of taxes owed, and information gathering and enforcement provisions. It emphasizes the TAA seeks to achieve balance between SARS duties and taxpayer rights and obligations, in line with South Africa's constitutional principles.
4th Annual Tax Conference - Surviving a Tax Audit under the TAA, 2011
1. 1
Prof Daniel N Erasmus
“How to survive a tax audit” under the new Tax Administration Act, 2011
2. 2
• More Info – http://www.iitf.net More notes & Advanced
Diploma In Tax Procedural Law
• http://www.TaxRadar.net - client funding
• Prof D N Erasmus –
daniel@TaxRiskManagement.com
• http://www.ErasmusOnTax.com
• List of cases
3. 3
BALANCE BETWEEN SARS’ POWERS & TAXPAYER RIGHTS
TAA seeks to achieve a balance between powers & duties of SARS
and rights & obligations of taxpayers thereby enhancing equity and
fairness of tax administration
SARS TAXPAYERS
Powers
&
Duties
Rights
&
Obligations
4. 4
• General observations
• Introduction - survey
• An approach to Tax Risk Management & recent article
• International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants
• SARS officials – Relationship Managers – ATO experience
• Specific provisions in the TAA relevant to audits
• Audit Commencement & SARS response
• Key Constitution provisions
• S 1(c) Principle of Legality; S 2; S 33; S 35(3)(j); PAJA – “administrative action” & S6(2) ; S 195
• S 172; S 237; S 4(2) of SARS Act
• Tax Court or High Court
5. 5
DESIGN OF TAA: MAIN CHAPTERS - HIGHLIGHTS
DESIGN OF TAB: MAIN CHAPTERS
Chapter 1 Definitions Chapter 11 Recovery of Taxes
Chapter 2 General Administration Chapter 12 Interest
Chapter 3 Registration Chapter 13 Refunds
Chapter 4 Returns and records Chapter Chapter 14 Write-off or Compromise of tax debt
Chapter 5 Information Gathering Chapter 15 Non Compliance
Chapter 6 Confidentiality of information Chapter 16 Understatement penalty
Chapter 7 Advance Rulings Chapter 17 Criminal Offence
Chapter 8 Assessment Chapter Chapter 18 Reporting of unprofessional conduct
Chapter 9 Dispute Resolution Chapter 19 General Provisions
Chapter 10 Tax Liability & Payment Chapter 20 Transitional Provisions
6. 6
INFORMATION GATHERING & ENFORCEMENT
SARS POWERS Taxpayers Rights
Information gathering Limitation on information (only if relevant to tax Act)
Protection of right against self-incrimination
PAJA & Secrecy to protect privacy rights
SARS Administrative Complaint Resolution
Tax Ombud / Public Protector / Courts
Inspection at premises without prior notice Limited grounds (e.g. identity of occupant)
Private dwelling – occupant must give consent
Request for information: Any‘relevant
material’ re identifiable taxpayers & group of
taxpayers Reasonable specificity of request
Limited to records reasonably maintained
Time extension must be considered
Just cause basis for refusal
Interview at SARS office & production of
relevant material
Only if intended to clarify issues of concern &render
audit unnecessary
Reasonable specificity of request
Field audit or criminal investigations Prior Notice of at least 10 days & taxpayer may
request different date
TAA: BALANCE BETWEEN POWERS & RIGHTS (1)
7. 7
TAA: BALANCE BETWEEN POWERS & RIGHTS (2)
INFORMATION GATHERING & ENFORCEMENT (cont.)
SARS TAXPAYER RIGHTS
POWERS
Audit Audit selection on rational basis (random or risk)
Only authorised SARS officials may audit & must produce authorisation
Audit reports on stage of completion to taxpayer
Notice of inconclusive audit to taxpayer
Letter of audit findings to taxpayer
Taxpayer may respond to findings prior to assessment
Criminal Separation between audit and criminal investigation
Investigations Only authorised SARS officials may investigate
Criminal investigation: Adherence to rights as suspect
Taxpayer must be informed of inconclusive investigation
Only senior SARS official may lay complaint with NPA
Inquiry Authorised by Judge of High Court upon application
Independent oversight of inquiry
Confidential & protection against incriminating evidence
Search & Warrant: Issued by Magistrate/Judge of High Court upon application
seizure Warrantless: Narrow circumstances
Carrying out: Decency & Order; Inventory; Copies/originals;
Protection of privileged documents; Application for return/damages
8. 8
RECOVERY
SARS POWERS TAXPAYER RIGHTS
Recovery Statutory limitations (e.g. TAB; Insolvency Act; Companies Act)
Period of limitations reduced to 15 years
Constitutional limitations (PAJA, property rights etc.)
SARS Administrative Complaint Resolution / Tax Ombud /
Public Protector / Court review
Civil procedural rights (e.g. Rescission of judgments)
Debt relief Deferment by instalment payment agreements
Write off or compromise agreements
Suspension pending outcome of dispute
Remittance of penalties and interest
Voluntary Disclosure Programme - penalty relief
Personal liability Prescribed criteria in TAB before 3rd party will be held liable
Normal court remedies during recovery
Repatriation of Prescribed judicial procedure before Judge of High Court
foreign assets
Preservation of Prescribed judicial procedure before Judge of High Court
assets
TAA: BALANCE BETWEEN POWERS & RIGHTS (3)
11. 11
1.Republic of South Africa
The Republic of South Africa is one, sovereign, democratic state founded on the
following values:
(a)Human dignity, the achievement of equality and the advancement of
human rights and freedoms.
(b)Non-racialism and non-sexism.
(c)Supremacy of the constitution and the rule of law.
(d)Universal adult suffrage, a national common voters roll, regular elections
and a multi-party system of democratic government, to ensure
accountability, responsiveness and openness.
2.Supremacy of Constitution
This Constitution is the supreme law of the Republic; law or conduct inconsistent
with it is invalid, and the obligations imposed by it must be fulfilled.
12. 12
237. Diligent performance of obligations
All constitutional obligations must be performed diligently and without delay.
13. 13
195. Basic values and principles governing public administration
Public administration must be governed by the democratic values and principles
enshrined in the Constitution, including the following principles:
(a) A high standard of professional ethics must be promoted and
maintained.
(b) Efficient, economic and effective use of resources must be promoted.
(c) Public administration must be development-oriented.
(d) Services must be provided impartially, fairly, equitably and without bias.
(e) People's needs must be responded to, and the public must be
encouraged to participate in policy-making.
(f) Public administration must be accountable.
(g) Transparency must be fostered by providing the public with timely,
accessible and accurate information…
14. 14
1.Republic of South Africa
The Republic of South Africa is one, sovereign, democratic state founded on the
following values:
(a)Human dignity, the achievement of equality and the advancement of
human rights and freedoms.
(b)Non-racialism and non-sexism.
(c)Supremacy of the constitution and the rule of law.
(d)Universal adult suffrage, a national common voters roll, regular elections
and a multi-party system of democratic government, to ensure
accountability, responsiveness and openness.
2.Supremacy of Constitution
This Constitution is the supreme law of the Republic; law or conduct inconsistent
with it is invalid, and the obligations imposed by it must be fulfilled.
15. 15
SARS Act 34 of 1997
4 (2) SARS must perform its functions in the most and effective manner and in
accordance with the values and principles mentioned in section 195 of the
Constitution.
Editor's Notes
In CSARS v Sprigg Investments 117CC t/a Global Investment the Supreme Court of Appeal quoted with approval from Ansett Transport Industries (Operations) Pty Ltd and Another v Wraith and Others the requirements for ‘ adequate reasons ’ in respect of tax matters in South Africa is definitively spelt out by the Supreme Court of Appeal as follows: … [T]he decision-maker [must] explain his decision in a way which will enable a person aggrieved to say, in effect: ‘ Even though I may not agree with it, I now understand why the decision went against me. I am now in a position to decide whether that decision has involved an unwarranted finding of fact, or an error of law, which is worth challenging. This requires that the decision-maker should set out his understanding of the relevant law, any findings of fact on which his conclusions depend (especially if those facts have been in dispute), and the reasoning processes which led him to those conclusions. He should do so in clear and unambiguous language, not in vague generalities or the formal language of legislation... 73 SATC 114 (SCA) at para ’ s [12] and [13]. (1983) 48 ALR 500.