SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 5
Download to read offline
Embedded Testing Vs Software
Testing – Key Differences
As the complexity of the modern world grows by the day, testing current software
has become critical for enterprises. Periodic testing is required to ensure the
software’s functionality and system integrity. Similar to that, embedded
systems/hardware do require proper testing to ensure high-end security for both
software and hardware.
This blog offers a substantial difference between embedded testing services and
regular software testing, finely highlighting the challenges around embedded
software testing and the different ways to implement it.
Key Differences: Software Testing and
Embedded Testing
Embedded software testing and software testing may appear to be comparable,
however the phrase “embedded” is the key differentiator.
The process of verifying and validating both software and hardware is known
as embedded application testing. It assures us that the entire embedded system,
involving software and hardware, is defect-free. It is primarily performed on
hardware in order to uncover flaws. It also guarantees that the system satisfies the
needs of the end user.
Embedded Testing Challenges
The primary differences listed above may provide some insight into the difficulties
that one may encounter while performing embedded software testing. Here are a
few major consequences that software engineers need to face during embedded
testing:
Scope of Automation
Developers and test engineers face a hard time automating things while working on
embedded testing projects, as embedded software testing solutions are more
dependable on hardware and the interfaces involved with it. Thus, there’s a need to
create a test rig that can support automation for both software and hardware.
High Hardware Dependency
Because of constrained access to hardware, hardware dependency is one of the
most significant challenges encountered during embedded software testing.
However, emulators and simulators may not exactly mirror the behavior of the
actual device and may provide an erroneous sense of system operation and
application usage.
Periodic Software Updates
Security fixes, RTOS updates, kernel upgrades, and other upgrades must be
performed on an embedded system on a regular basis. Such modifications can have
a direct impact on testing processes, rendering them more complicated. As a result,
more attention is required during the development, production, and deployment
processes.
Repeatable Defects
Defects in embedded systems are more difficult to reproduce/recreate. This
indicates that the embedded tester should pay more attention to each and every
error occurrence, significantly higher than in a conventional situation. Aside from
collecting as much data as is reasonably required to change the system and locate
the source of the fault.
High Ratio of Open-Source Software
The availability of open-source components for embedded application testing is
pretty high and dominant. As a result, they lack comprehensive testing. There are
several test combinations and resulting outcomes.
Different Ways of Performing Embedded
Testing
There are basically five levels of testing for embedded systems which are followed
industry-wide:
Software Unit Testing
The unit module can either be a function, procedure or class. During the software
development process, it is accomplished by isolating a part of code and validating its
accuracy. Unit testing is typically carried out under the supervision of a developer
and then passed on to a peer-review model. Test cases are created based on the
module specifications.
Integration Testing
Integration testing for embedded systems can be further classified into two parts for
better understanding – A) Software Integration Testing and B) Software/Hardware
Integration Testing
It comprises the interaction of software components with the hardware domain. This
test can also be used to examine the interaction between software and built-in
peripheral devices.
Embedded application testing is always performed in a real-world context that is
similar to that of software. Because thorough testing cannot be performed in a
simulated environment, most testers regard embedded testing services as an
essential task.
System Unit Testing
The test module is a framework that contains complete information on software
codes, and the real-time operating system (RTOS), including specifics about
communications, mechanisms, and interruptions, among other things. From here,
the point of control protocol is used to send communication and guarantee that it is
routed through the RTOS message queues.
The developer or system integration team then examines the system resources to
ensure that the system can support the embedded system execution. Gray box
testing is frequently used in this process.
System Integration Testing
The whole testing module starts from a set of components, including subsystem
components, within a single nod. The Control and Observations Points are a
combination of network communication protocols and RTOS, including network
messages and RTOS events. Additional mentionable components such as Virtual
Tester can play a similar role to a node.
System Validation Testing
The module which needs to be tested is either a complete subsystem or the entire
embedded system. The goal of this final test is to meet the functional criteria of the
external entity. It should be noted that an external entity can be either a human or a
device in a telecommunications network, or both.
Conclusion
From this point, it is understandable that the difficulties involved with embedded
software testing are higher compared to software testing. The heavy reliance on the
hardware environment, which is developed concurrently with the program and is
frequently necessary to do reliable software testing. It can be difficult to test
software without custom tools, which makes focusing on testing in the late phases
extremely appealing.
Partner with us, ImpactQA is a prominent embedded testing service provider, which
has been aggressively involved in giving intelligent embedded solutions to worldwide
organizations to strengthen their embedded system.

More Related Content

More from Zoe Gilbert

More from Zoe Gilbert (20)

Logistics Automation to Strengthen Process Efficiency.pdf
Logistics Automation to Strengthen Process Efficiency.pdfLogistics Automation to Strengthen Process Efficiency.pdf
Logistics Automation to Strengthen Process Efficiency.pdf
 
Accelerating Digital Transformation in the BFSI Sector.pdf
Accelerating Digital Transformation in the BFSI Sector.pdfAccelerating Digital Transformation in the BFSI Sector.pdf
Accelerating Digital Transformation in the BFSI Sector.pdf
 
Hyperautomation.pdf
Hyperautomation.pdfHyperautomation.pdf
Hyperautomation.pdf
 
What is the Right Approach to QA Outsourcing.pdf
What is the Right Approach to QA Outsourcing.pdfWhat is the Right Approach to QA Outsourcing.pdf
What is the Right Approach to QA Outsourcing.pdf
 
AI in Cloud Computing
AI in Cloud ComputingAI in Cloud Computing
AI in Cloud Computing
 
Boast the Potential of DevOps with CI CD
Boast the Potential of DevOps with CI CDBoast the Potential of DevOps with CI CD
Boast the Potential of DevOps with CI CD
 
What is Sanity Testing.pdf
What is Sanity Testing.pdfWhat is Sanity Testing.pdf
What is Sanity Testing.pdf
 
Tackle Business Risks with Continuous Testing.pdf
Tackle Business Risks with Continuous Testing.pdfTackle Business Risks with Continuous Testing.pdf
Tackle Business Risks with Continuous Testing.pdf
 
Guide to Successful AI.pdf
Guide to Successful AI.pdfGuide to Successful AI.pdf
Guide to Successful AI.pdf
 
Top Software Testing Models for Customer Satisfaction.pdf
Top Software Testing Models for Customer Satisfaction.pdfTop Software Testing Models for Customer Satisfaction.pdf
Top Software Testing Models for Customer Satisfaction.pdf
 
Compliance testing or conformance testing
Compliance testing or conformance testingCompliance testing or conformance testing
Compliance testing or conformance testing
 
Agile digital transformation
Agile digital transformationAgile digital transformation
Agile digital transformation
 
Security and privacy issues with io t healthcare devices
Security and privacy issues with io t healthcare devicesSecurity and privacy issues with io t healthcare devices
Security and privacy issues with io t healthcare devices
 
Web app penetration testing best methods tools used
Web app penetration testing best methods tools usedWeb app penetration testing best methods tools used
Web app penetration testing best methods tools used
 
Api testing for open banking operations
Api testing for open banking operationsApi testing for open banking operations
Api testing for open banking operations
 
Page Object Model and Implementation in Selenium
Page Object Model and Implementation in Selenium  Page Object Model and Implementation in Selenium
Page Object Model and Implementation in Selenium
 
Moving from selenium to protractor for test automation
Moving from selenium to protractor for test automationMoving from selenium to protractor for test automation
Moving from selenium to protractor for test automation
 
What makes OSINT Methodologies Vital for Penetration Testing?
What makes OSINT Methodologies Vital for Penetration Testing?What makes OSINT Methodologies Vital for Penetration Testing?
What makes OSINT Methodologies Vital for Penetration Testing?
 
Top 7 Security Measures for IoT Systems
Top 7 Security Measures for IoT Systems Top 7 Security Measures for IoT Systems
Top 7 Security Measures for IoT Systems
 
5 Key Steps to Effective SAP Testing
5 Key Steps to Effective SAP Testing  5 Key Steps to Effective SAP Testing
5 Key Steps to Effective SAP Testing
 

Embedded Testing Vs Software Testing – Key Difference.pdf

  • 1. Embedded Testing Vs Software Testing – Key Differences As the complexity of the modern world grows by the day, testing current software has become critical for enterprises. Periodic testing is required to ensure the software’s functionality and system integrity. Similar to that, embedded systems/hardware do require proper testing to ensure high-end security for both software and hardware. This blog offers a substantial difference between embedded testing services and regular software testing, finely highlighting the challenges around embedded software testing and the different ways to implement it. Key Differences: Software Testing and Embedded Testing Embedded software testing and software testing may appear to be comparable, however the phrase “embedded” is the key differentiator.
  • 2. The process of verifying and validating both software and hardware is known as embedded application testing. It assures us that the entire embedded system, involving software and hardware, is defect-free. It is primarily performed on hardware in order to uncover flaws. It also guarantees that the system satisfies the needs of the end user. Embedded Testing Challenges The primary differences listed above may provide some insight into the difficulties that one may encounter while performing embedded software testing. Here are a few major consequences that software engineers need to face during embedded testing: Scope of Automation Developers and test engineers face a hard time automating things while working on embedded testing projects, as embedded software testing solutions are more dependable on hardware and the interfaces involved with it. Thus, there’s a need to create a test rig that can support automation for both software and hardware. High Hardware Dependency Because of constrained access to hardware, hardware dependency is one of the most significant challenges encountered during embedded software testing. However, emulators and simulators may not exactly mirror the behavior of the actual device and may provide an erroneous sense of system operation and application usage. Periodic Software Updates Security fixes, RTOS updates, kernel upgrades, and other upgrades must be performed on an embedded system on a regular basis. Such modifications can have a direct impact on testing processes, rendering them more complicated. As a result, more attention is required during the development, production, and deployment processes. Repeatable Defects Defects in embedded systems are more difficult to reproduce/recreate. This indicates that the embedded tester should pay more attention to each and every error occurrence, significantly higher than in a conventional situation. Aside from collecting as much data as is reasonably required to change the system and locate the source of the fault.
  • 3. High Ratio of Open-Source Software The availability of open-source components for embedded application testing is pretty high and dominant. As a result, they lack comprehensive testing. There are several test combinations and resulting outcomes. Different Ways of Performing Embedded Testing There are basically five levels of testing for embedded systems which are followed industry-wide: Software Unit Testing The unit module can either be a function, procedure or class. During the software development process, it is accomplished by isolating a part of code and validating its accuracy. Unit testing is typically carried out under the supervision of a developer and then passed on to a peer-review model. Test cases are created based on the module specifications. Integration Testing Integration testing for embedded systems can be further classified into two parts for better understanding – A) Software Integration Testing and B) Software/Hardware Integration Testing
  • 4. It comprises the interaction of software components with the hardware domain. This test can also be used to examine the interaction between software and built-in peripheral devices. Embedded application testing is always performed in a real-world context that is similar to that of software. Because thorough testing cannot be performed in a simulated environment, most testers regard embedded testing services as an essential task. System Unit Testing The test module is a framework that contains complete information on software codes, and the real-time operating system (RTOS), including specifics about communications, mechanisms, and interruptions, among other things. From here, the point of control protocol is used to send communication and guarantee that it is routed through the RTOS message queues. The developer or system integration team then examines the system resources to ensure that the system can support the embedded system execution. Gray box testing is frequently used in this process. System Integration Testing The whole testing module starts from a set of components, including subsystem components, within a single nod. The Control and Observations Points are a combination of network communication protocols and RTOS, including network messages and RTOS events. Additional mentionable components such as Virtual Tester can play a similar role to a node. System Validation Testing The module which needs to be tested is either a complete subsystem or the entire embedded system. The goal of this final test is to meet the functional criteria of the external entity. It should be noted that an external entity can be either a human or a device in a telecommunications network, or both. Conclusion From this point, it is understandable that the difficulties involved with embedded software testing are higher compared to software testing. The heavy reliance on the hardware environment, which is developed concurrently with the program and is frequently necessary to do reliable software testing. It can be difficult to test software without custom tools, which makes focusing on testing in the late phases extremely appealing.
  • 5. Partner with us, ImpactQA is a prominent embedded testing service provider, which has been aggressively involved in giving intelligent embedded solutions to worldwide organizations to strengthen their embedded system.