Christian Freedom Society

Christian Freedom Society

Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled
again with the yoke of bondage.
Galatians 5:1
CFS
MANIFESTO
William Duke Turpin, Sr.
Lt. Colonel, USAF (Ret.)
08252016

Index
Introduction 3
Dedication 5
CFS Intent 8
Churchill on Islam 13
The End of Conflict 13
CFS Principles 15
Freedom 16
Political Spectrum Model 17
Free Enterprise 20
Human Rights 21
Freedom of Religion 22
Right to life 25
CFS Policies 27
A Strong National Defense 29
The Second Amendment 34
Fiscal Responsibility 35
Ensure Cultural Decency 37
Additional CFS Policies are: Judaic Christian Nation, National language, CFS
Brotherhood, Traditional Marriage, Department of Education, Flat Tax, Monopoly Laws,
Support Workers, Small Businesses, Profit Sharing, and the Number of National Public
Servants, Establish a CFS International.
CFS Information, Opportunities, Sign-up Form & Logo 42
LOGO 46
2

Introduction
The United States of America is a constitutional republic where political issues are decided
democratically, and the majority rules. Human rights of all citizens are protected by the
Bill of Rights, and the difficulties of the federal system of government are overcome by
our Constitution, and a balance of power in the executive, legislative, and judicial parts of
the National Government and the individual States.
We are, by a majority, a Christian Nation. Our forefathers were Christians, and by the
phrase “freedom of religion” they established no National Christian Church as The Church
of England was established in our Mother Country.
The Freedom of Religion is sacred to us, and there will be no attempt to establish any
religion or Christian denomination, but the first Amendment has been so badly interpreted
that the National government has banned religion in government venues. We will support
an amendment which will state that this is a Judaic Christian Nation with freedom of
religion in all places.
We fought many battles against other Nations who spoke a different language in forming
our Nation. We speak English, and English is our National language. We will make English
our official language. However, regardless of nationality, language, race, or ethnicity, we
consider all people as our dearest neighbors because we believe we humans are the highest
expression of God and nature. We choose to be addressed as Neighbor.
Judaism and Christianity worship the one God. We describe ourselves as Judaic Christians
as did our Forefathers. Jews believe God is not divisible and Christians believe in the
Trinity, that God has three aspects. We both believe a higher spirit guides us when we call
upon God through the Holy Spirit and the Spirit of Life. We also believe Moses received
the Ten Commandments on Mount Sinai from God. We will begin with these agreements
and create a Nation worthy to worship God, secure our Nation and Israel, and create “the
New Jerusalem that will not pass away.”
3

Almighty God: We make our earnest prayer that Thou wilt keep the United States in
Thy Holy protection; that Thou wilt most graciously be pleased to dispose us all to do
justice, to love mercy, and demean ourselves with that charity, humility, and pacific
temper of mind which were the characteristics of the Divine Author of our blessed
religion, and without a humble imitation of whose example in these things we can
never hope to be a happy nation. Grant our supplications, we beseech Thee, through
Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.
George Washington
4

Everyone has inside of him a piece of good news. The good news is that you don’t know
how great you can be! How much you can love! What you can accomplish! And what
your potential is! Anne Frank
5

As long as we are on this earth, we possess dual citizenship. On one hand, we owe
allegiance to our nation and we are called to be good citizens. But we are also citizens of
the kingdom of God.
Reverend Billy Graham
.
6

Christ’s works testified to what he was. Our works will testify to what we are.
Father Emil Joseph Kapaun
These writings are dedicated to George Washington, Anne Frank, Reverend
Billy Graham, and Father Emil Joseph Kapaun.
7

CFS
Intent
Ideologically, of all the possible Authoritarian regimes, Islam is the strongest, the most
cruel, the most dogmatic. There is little possibility of instilling democratic institutions in
Islamic countries because there is little separation between the religion and the government
in Islamic countries. Basically, they want to kill all of us if they cannot convert us to their
religion. Islam has only been spread through conquest.
CFS is militant. We must prepare ourselves to fight a protracted conflict while leading a
Crusade for Peace. There is no denying that Islam is at war with the Western World
through terrorism, propaganda, and taking advantage of our liberal institutions and
immigration laws to infiltrate our culture and society.
In the interest of Freedom of Religion we have given a pass to Islam on their consistently
evil behavior. As Life precedes Freedom, Freedom precedes Religious Freedom, or to say
it differently, you must have Life to have Freedom, and you must have Freedom to have
Religious Freedom.
The enemy ofCCFS is Statism, and Islam defines absolute Statism by controlling all
believers bodies with Shariah law, and their minds with fear in a completely dogmatic
religion. The level of fear, even in this Country, among Muslims is obviously high enough
to keep “moderate Muslims” silent concerning terrorist atrocities.
8

Qur'an:9:5
Fight and kill the disbelievers wherever you find them, take them captive, harass them,
lie in wait and ambush them using every stratagem of war.
Qur’an:9:29
Fight those who do not believe until they all surrender, paying the protective tax in
submission.
Qur’an:8:39
Fight them until all opposition ends and all submit to Allah.
Qur’an:9:38
Believers, what is the matter with you, that when you are asked to go forth and fight in
Allah's Cause you cling to the earth? Do you prefer the life of this world to the
Hereafter? Unless you go forth, He will afflict and punish you with a painful doom, and
put others in your place.
Qur'an:4:94
Believers, when you go abroad to fight wars in Allah's Cause, investigate carefully, and
say not to anyone who greets you: 'You are not a believer!' Coveting the chance profits
of this life (so that you may despoil him). With Allah are plenteous spoils and booty.
Islam has attacked Christians and Jews since the Seventh
Century.
Now — the attack has reached us.
Islam is violent, Islam is dangerous, Islam is deceptive, Islam is based on an
uncompromising division of the world between Believer and Unbeliever and is obsessed
with territory, that is between the lands of where Muslims rule and what, for now, are still
the lands of the Infidels.
Regardless of the stark differences, CFS is on a crusade for peace, but we must be aware
of the differences and attempt to infuse democratic values into Islam. Moderates are justly
afraid. Would you differentiate between moderate and radical Nazis?
We have a serious identity problem. When discussing with friends our problem with Muslim
terrorists, I mention the fact that Islam is Totalitarian, and they agree the subject is political, but
9

not discussed in conversations or anywhere else. If there are countless moderate Muslims, why
are they so quiet? Why don’t they rescue other Muslims terrorized by Muslim terrorists? I do not
believe Muslims would rescue Christians either. Do you? Are they afraid? I am a Vietnam
veteran, and the situation is similar because you could not distinguish between Vietcong (the
enemy) and loyal South Vietnamese. Problematically, in a fire-fight, you heard “kill all of them
and let God separate them.”It behooves moderate Muslims to separate themselves, as suggested
above, before the situation cataclysmically escalates.
FDR stated Four Freedoms:
♣ Freedom of Speech
♣ Freedom of Worship
♣ Freedom from Want, and
♣ Freedom from Fear
Where is the pride of the Western World when we live in fear? Russia for sure, and
probably China, will join us in our World changing effort to never live in fear of Islam.
Until we unite in Freedom it is reasonable to expect a terror-ridden future. Any person
must agree the threat of nuclear, or other WMD attack, will be with us until we have a
World of Free Enterprise and Human Rights.
After 9/11, the Nation was undoubtedly unsure of the best way to combat the new threat of
international Islamic terrorism. The nation of Iraq had a tyrannical despot who had
murdered thousands of his fellow Kurd countrymen, who happened to be ethnically
different, with chemical weapons of mass destruction (WMDs.) Iraq is Islamic, and if the
Dictator Saddam Hussein were defeated and brought to trial, possibly, an Islamic
Democracy could be established and serve as a model for the rest of Islam.
President Bush ordered the invasion of Iraq with the goal of bringing the Dictator to trial,
and that was accomplished. But, the goal of establishing a viable Islamic Democracy was a
complete failure. The goal was quixotic because the Islamic religion is Authoritarian, and
Sharia Law creates fear for those advocating Democracy. Incidentally, converting Nations
to Islam, by Muslim Theocratic Fascists, has been accomplished exclusively by military
aggression. President Bush believed the best chance of averting a Holocaust, of the Muslim
world, was to turn the Muslim world toward Democracy. It was idealistic, even quixotic,
but if there is not a trend for democracy where the Muslim people police their own
radicals, the terrorists will eventually employ weapons of mass destruction on the Western
world. Our Liberals will be the first to call for retaliation, and our strategic forces will
obliterate the nations from which the terrorists originated as promised through our
10

necessary foreign policy. The Bush policy was idealistic, even altruistic, in its attempt to
save Muslim lives.
Islam is the fastest growing religion in this Country. That seems strange except for the fact
that Islam is puritanical, and our mainline Protestant churches seem to forget that
cleanliness is next to godliness, and it might appeal to converts to Islam to wash away the
filth which is Roe v Wade, and the resultant emphasis of physical sex to the detriment of
romantic love.
Any informed person must agree that all the elements necessary for cataclysmic
destruction will be with us until we have created an orderly democratic World. I take issue
with separating radical and moderate Muslims as a threat and how to interact with them.
Moderates can be turned into fanatics by success as well as opposition; witness the
increasing fanaticism of all the Axis powers before El Alamein and Stalingrad. It is
reasonable to ask each Muslim leader if he (disregard she) is actively making efforts to
moderate their brothers, and advise them of the ultimate consequences of their behavior. It
must be understood that you are either for us, or against us. The stakes are too high for
gray areas. Some of us live close to Muslims. They are physically, neighbors. We should
love our neighbors, and we do. Hopefully, domestic Muslims will wholeheartedly join us
in the fight against terrorism; however, their safety will have low priority if full scale war
erupts.
The World has experienced Islamic militant expansionism since the inception of Islam, but
our “to arms” was sounded on September 11, 2001 with the tragedy of the destruction of
the twin towers of the World Trade Center and the large loss of American lives. This is, as
was the Cold War, a protracted, eschatological war because the ideological differences are
vast. With the electronic communication of today, Islamic radicals believe the World
cannot accommodate our culture and their culture side by side. As terrible as the attack
was, we are fortunate it was such a dramatic event to alert us to the threat of a much larger
attack when weapons of mass destruction are available to the terrorists. For their own
survival, Muslim leaders must monitor and control their extreme radicals. If that does not
happen, then our only option is self-defense with universal military training, superior
domestic and foreign intelligence, and the military capabilities to carry out an overt,
candid, bellicose foreign policy.
We defended Democracy against the attempt of mind control by egalitarian and elitist
Statists. We are now defending our constitutional republic from the worst possible mind
control, that of theocratic totalitarianism where your body, and your mind, are completely
subjugated.
11

Our domestic Muslim leaders should vastly increase their efforts to help defend this
Country against radical Islam. I am not aware of communications to our public by them.
Also, our Protestant, Catholic, and Jewish leaders should be in daily conversations with
Muslim leaders. The followers of Moses and Jesus are sheep in the midst of wolves when
facing sickness, debauchery, and the Islam devil. “Think not that I am come to peace on
earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.”
God has consistently subdued evil through the directed efforts of men and women since the
exodus of the chosen people from Egypt. Why don’t they speak out? They are afraid. They
are more afraid than the good people of Germany after Nazism had been established. They
must have the “guts” to speak, or their status will be diminished when difficult times
arrive.
A significant article in July, 2005, “Muslim World Must Cut Out Its Cancer” by Thomas
Friedman of The New York Times was seminal only in the sense that the liberal media has
noticed that the Emperor is wearing no clothes. However, we should not quibble about the
source, but discuss how to encourage the process. I suggest these groups have little in
common with the political and religious attitudes of radical, or even moderate, Muslims.
There must be other morally inspired institutions with decent political attitudes to begin a
dialogue with Muslim clerics to hopefully motivate the Muslim clerics to speak and act
against the terrorists.
Our foreign policy should be completely overt and transparent. In every Muslim Country,
there is a Government responsible for the acts of their people. They should understand that
when we trace acts of terrorism against us, or any other NATO nation, that they have two
weeks to evacuate their biggest, most industrial city before it is strategically destroyed by
conventional weapons. If they are later responsible for acts of terrorism then all of their
industrial cities must be evacuated in two weeks before they are destroyed. If they are later
responsible for acts of terrorism, tactical military forces will ensure that the belligerent
Nation is reduced to the “stone age.” There should never be a need for “boots on
ground” in this conflict.
12

Churchill on Islam
Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses
the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the
world. Winston Churchill in the year of 1899:
How dreadful are the curses which (Islam) lays on its votaries! (adherents) Besides the
fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this
fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries, improvident (not
planning ahead) habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce,
and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A
degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement, the next of its dignity
and sanctity. The fact that in (Islamic) law every woman must belong to some man as his
absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction
of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.
Winston Churchill was a brave young soldier, a brilliant journalist, an extraordinary
politician and statesman, a great war leader and British Prime Minister, to whom the
Western world must be forever in his debt. He was a prophet in his own time.
The End of Conflict
The concept of the United Nations is good, but it has steadily degenerated to the point
where its actions are not only insipid, but wrong. When the Free Enterprise American
Party explodes in this electronic World, the Nations of the World will be led to Freedom
and unimaginable prosperity.
There will be no war if the Islamic nations agree to our National Principles:
♣ Free Enterprise
♣ Codified Human Rights
♣ Freedom of Religion
♣ Right to Life
When there is assured peace, Jerusalem will be the place where the God of Abraham is
worshipped and all of his people of the Book will be represented.
13

I was glad when they said unto me
We will go into the house of the Lord
Our feet will stand in thy gates
O Jerusalem.
Jerusalem is builded as a city
That is unity in itself.
O pray for the peace of Jerusalem
They will prosper that love thee.
Peace be within thy walls
And plenteousness within thy palaces.
Psalm 122
It was the new Jerusalem that will not pass away.
The Holy City
14

CFS
Principles
Freedom
Free Enterprise
Codified Human Rights
Freedom of Religion
Right to Life
“A constitution founded on these principles introduces knowledge among the people, and
inspires them with a conscious dignity becoming freemen; a general emulation takes place,
which causes good humor, sociability, good manners, and good morals to be general. That
elevation of sentiment inspired by such a government, makes the common people brave
and enterprising. That ambition which is inspired by it makes them sober, industrious, and
frugal.”
John Adams,
Thoughts on Government, 1776
15

Freedom
The communications that formed your spiritual-self are most important to you, but second in
importance to you is what you learned that formed your political attitudes. The political system
under which you live is important in every aspect of your life, and important to the quality of life
of those you love. Why some people are not interested in politics is a mystery to me, and we
have a desperate need to understand politics, because: Freedom is rare; Freedom is fragile.
Statism is the enemy of Freedom. Statism is where the people give the central government
control of economic planning and policy. The people can grant Statism to the central government
a little bit at a time, but at a certain point the Government is powerful enough to give itself
exclusive control of economic planning and policy. When the central government has absolute
control of economic planning and policy — you have fallen into slavery. At the conclusion of
Orwell’s 1984 — Winston Smith loved Big Brother. At the beginning of the Novel, it was
already too late because Statism is often a protracted, incremental process. Statism is the
opposite of economic freedom, the enemy of Capitalism, and destroys individual sovereignty.
Consider Totalitarian Germany, Italy, the Soviet Union, and Japan during WWII. Their routes to
absolute Totalitarian control of the bodies and minds of their citizens varied in method and
degree of subjugation, but each Government ruled through fear of the Party, and fear of the
Government elite.
Today, we have become aware that we can easily slip into increasing governmental intervention
and control of our health, education, and economy.
Those of you who are proud pragmatists, please accept the Ideology of Freedom, because
increasing
governmental control should be the most important consideration in your political decisions. You
should know where you fall on the political spectrum.
Here is the political spectrum model I had available during my education.
“Communism————————————Fascism”
Brilliant! Where do the Democrats fall?
Our acceptance of Statism is the primary factor that determines our political attitudes. This fact
can best be illustrated with a simple political spectrum model that lists the primary political
entities and arguments. (The prime determinant of political attitudes is about who controls the
16

money — the Government, or the People.)
The words “Conservative” and “Liberal” are used by speakers and writers erroneously because
the labels are highly subjective. A Conservative is a person who appreciates favorably the culture
in which they grew up. A Liberal has issues about the culture in which they grew up, and wants
some changes, normally, changes through the power of the national government.
The subjectivity can be demonstrated by several facts: Libertarians are mostly more Liberal than
Republicans, and want the government to affect cultural change; a Russian would be a
Conservative who is nostalgic over the demise of the Soviet Union, and fortunately, there are
both Conservatives and Liberals in our two major political parties.
The words “right” and “left” used in a political context have a connotation of “right,” reliance
on a strong
military force, and “left,” very little reliance on military force.
Anarchists are not on the political attitudes model. They don’t want any government at all.
The political spectrum model lists: Republicans, Libertarians, Democrats, Socialists,
Authoritarians, and Totalitarians to represent increasing Statism.
Republicans desire minimum control of economic planning and policy by the central
government, but basically, Republicans are Conservative to the point they interpret the
Constitution through the minds and hearts of the Nation’s Founders. The legitimate functions of
the central government are:
First — The national government should secure the peace through an overwhelmingly strong
offensive strategic capability, and strong military tactical capability to reduce the need for a
strategic response.
Second — The national government should ensure cultural decency. There has never been an
enduring Democracy with an immoral society. Republicans believe ensuring a decent culture is a
national government responsibility.
Lastly — The national government should enforce the laws expressing the will of the people.
Libertarians are next. Libertarians desire minimum government intervention in the economy,
and support government fiscal responsibility; however, Libertarians favor progressive legislation
on cultural issues in reference to sex and drugs, for examples. On foreign affairs they want a
small military force due to an isolationist position in foreign affairs.
18

Democrats are next. We need two major political parties — one that emphasizes production, and
one that emphasizes distribution. Republicans believe that production comes first. Democrats
fight for equitable distribution.
The enemy of Free Enterprise is Statism. The political entities below the Democrats —Socialists,
Authoritarians, and Totalitarians, believe the central government should possess complete control
of financial planning and policy. Socialists, Authoritarians, and Totalitarians are our political
foes. We will defeat them as we defeated their model of egalitarian-propaganda, the Totalitarian
Soviet Union, by explaining a superior economic ideology, the Ideology of Freedom.
At some point in the descent down into the abyss, there is no Conservative or Liberal
consideration because the people must accept the government’s propaganda through fear of the
regime. Authoritarians and petty Dictators control your body, but care nothing about what you
think other than your fear of the regime. Totalitarians, like the Fascists and Leninist Communists,
control your body and your mind, to inspire your dedication to the Party goals.
Totalitarians differ primarily in their propaganda — elitist Fascists, and egalitarian Communists.
A significant difference in the two is — Fascists simply control industry; whereas, the Soviets
micro-managed industry with their “five year plans.” The Russian word “soviet” loosely
translates to “committee.” No wonder they failed.
The adversary of Freedom is Statism. Statism is defined as “giving a centralized government
control over economic planning and policy.” As was stated earlier, Statism can be present in
increased degrees down to Totalitarianism. It is historically evident, the more Statist the
government, the more likely that government will initiate a war.
The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same
hands, whether one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective,
may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny. James Madison
Freedom is precious — and rare.
19

Free Enterprise
How does an individual become free? An individual becomes free from the restraints of distance
and time by modern transportation — the car, aircraft, the Interstate system. Our lives have been
freed from the drudgery of working from sunrise to sunset by all the technological innovations of
the industrial revolution and even more fantastic advances in electronics and communication.
No one person - no group of people - no nation, or continent is responsible; however, the people
who have made the greatest contributions are the people who have studied the problems, and
were motivated to profit themselves and their neighbors - those who were allowed by democracy
and free enterprise to reach for the stars.
FREE ENTERPRISE GOVERNMENT
Rewards profit.—————————— Punishes profit.
Penalizes unnecessary expenditures—- Rewards expenditures with
additional funding
Rewards workers.————————— Taxes workers.
Rewards working.————————— Rewards not-working
Production and pricing are ————— Production and pricing
determined by democratic process. are determined by
unelected bureaucrats.
Encourages new ideas that are———- Creates laws and regulations for
voted on by consumers. the courts to interpret.
Loss of income is the result of———— Lack of sufficient funding is the
inefficiency and incompetence. reason for failure.
Failure is a successful ——————— Failure is not acknowledged.
learning experience.
20

Codified Human Rights
All people are equally entitled to human rights, a concept that is central to the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights of 1948, which was adopted by the United Nations in response to
the Holocaust. This modern tenet shares much in common with the Jewish belief that all human
beings are created in the Divine image—infinitely valuable and deserving of respect. We believe
that realizing human rights is the essential first step to building just societies.
When people are empowered to pursue
their own destinies and have a voice in shaping solutions to problems they experience, they are
better equipped to overcome poverty, live with dignity and transform the lives of others.
Our “Bill of Rights” is exemplary as codified human rights.
21

Freedom of Religion
God governs in the affairs of man. And, if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without His notice,
is it probable that an empire can rise without his aid ? We have been assured in the Sacred
Writings except that the Lord build the house, they labor in vain that build it. I firmly believe this.
I also believe that, without His concurring aid, we shall succeed in this political building no
better than the builders of Babel. Benjamin Franklin
!
Jacob Duché Offering the First Prayer in Congress, Sept. 7, 1774,
bottom pane of the Liberty Window, Christ Church, Philadelphia,
after a painting by Harrison Tompkins Matteson, c. 1848
George Washington, Samuel Adams, James Madison, John Witherspoon, Alexander Hamilton,
John Jay, John Adams, Patrick Henry, and even Thomas Jefferson--their personal
correspondence, biographies, and public statements are replete with quotations showing that
these thinkers had political philosophies deeply influenced by Christianity.
The phrase "Founding Fathers" is a proper noun. It refers to a specific group of men, the 55
delegates to the Constitutional Convention. There were other important players not in attendance,
like Jefferson, whose thinking deeply influenced the shaping of our nation. These 55 Founding
Fathers, though, made up the core.
The denominational affiliations of these men were a matter of public record. Among the
delegates were 28 Episcopalians, 8 Presbyterians, 7 Congregationalists, 2 Lutherans, 2 Dutch
Reformed, 2 Methodists, 2 Roman Catholics, 1 unknown, and only 3 deists--Williamson, Wilson,
22

and Franklin--this at a time when church membership entailed a sworn public confession of
biblical faith.
This is a revealing tally. It shows that the members of the Constitutional Convention, the most
influential group of men shaping the political foundations of our nation, were almost all
Christians, 51 of 55--a full 93%. Indeed, 70% were Calvinists (the Episcopalians, Presbyterians,
and the Dutch Reformed), considered by some to be the most extreme and dogmatic form of
Christianity.
Even Colonies such as Virginia, which were planned as commercial ventures, were led by
entrepreneurs who considered themselves "militant Protestants" and who worked diligently to
promote the prosperity of the church. The faith in which the Colonies were founded gave them a
religious orientation that remained strong when the government of the United States was created
in the years after 1776. Boosted by the "golden age" of evangelicalism, religion thrived in 19th
century America. Its impact remained so conspicuous in the early decades of this century that in
1922 a British observer called the United States "a nation with the soul of a church.”
The first Jews who settled in British North America were fleeing a possible pogrom in Brazil.
For some decades, Jews had flourished in Dutch-held areas of Brazil, but a Portuguese conquest
of the area in 1654 confronted them with the prospect of the introduction of the Inquisition,
which had recently burned a Brazilian Jew at the stake (1647). A shipload of 23 Jewish refugees
from Dutch Brazil arrived in New Amsterdam (soon to become New York) in 1654 and by the
next year had established religious services in the city. By the time of the Declaration of
Independence, they had established several thriving synagogues.
Although the Stuart kings of England were not haters of the Church of Rome, many of their
subjects were, with the result that Catholics were harassed and persecuted in England throughout
the 17th century. Driven by "the sacred duty of finding a refuge for his Roman Catholic
brethren," George Calvert (1580-1632), a principal lieutenant of James I until his religion cost
him his job, obtained a charter from Charles I in 1632 for the territory between Pennsylvania and
Virginia. The Maryland charter offered no guidelines on religion, although it was assumed that
Catholics would not be molested in the new Colony.
Catholic fortunes fluctuated in Maryland during the rest of the 17th century, as they became an
increasingly smaller minority of the population. After the Glorious Revolution of 1689 in
England, the Church of England was legally established in the Colony.
No one can deny that many of the founding fathers of the United States of America were men of
deep religious convictions based in the Bible and their Christian faith in Jesus Christ. Of the 56
men who signed the Declaration of Independence, nearly half (24) held seminary or Bible school
degrees.
These Christian quotes of the founding fathers will give you an overview of their strong moral
and spiritual convictions which helped form the foundations of our nation and our government.
23

The faith in which the Colonies were founded gave them a religious orientation that remained
strong when the government of the United States was created in the years after 1776. Boosted by
the "golden age" of evangelicalism, religion thrived in 19th century America. Its impact
remained so conspicuous in the early decades of this century that in 1922 a British observer
called the United States "a nation with the soul of a church.”
But a Constitution of Government once changed from Freedom, can never be returned.
Liberty once lost, is lost forever.
John Adams
24

Right to Life
a
God might have imbued Man with perfection in an inalterable state from the beginning.
But, God did not choose for Man to be “perfect,” but to have the nature of God which is to
choose for yourself. God is for Freedom:
Life is sacred!
Freedom is sacred!
Life precedes Freedom!
The traditional family is the bulwark of society in maintaining a decent culture.
Human Life begins at inception, so protection of innocent Life is the linch-pin of
cultural decency.
When a person says, “It’s not your body,”
It is my culture.
AJP is absolutely opposed to abortion except in the interest of saving the Mother’s life. Rapists,
but not the Child, will suffer greatly.
Married and single expectant Mothers will receive great care and attention. Support of unmarried
Mothers requires attention. Civil unions between the same sex would be allowed, but no
governmental financial entitlements would be gained.
You have searched me, Lord,
and you know me.
Even the darkness will not be dark to you;
the night will shine like the day,
for darkness is as light to you.
For you created my inmost being;
you knit me together in my mother’s womb.
I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made;
your works are wonderful,
I know that full well.
My frame was not hidden from you
when I was made in the secret place,
when I was woven together in the depths of the earth.
Your eyes saw my unformed body;
all the days ordained for me were written in your book
before one of them came to be.
How precious to me are your thoughts, God!
How vast is the sum of them!
25

CFS
Policies
The adversary of Freedom is Statism. Statism is defined as “giving a centralized government
control over economic planning and policy.” As was often stated earlier, Statism can be present
in increased degrees down to Totalitarianism. It is evident in history, the more Statist the
government, the more likely that government will initiate a war. Statism is responsible for all
wars. Historically, Freedom is rare.
We fought for Freedom in two hot World Wars and one“Cold War.”. Our internal Freedom must
also be constantly protected by an understanding and promulgation of the Ideology of Freedom.
We can be economically stronger, and create a World of Peace and Prosperity.
(The Manifesto is a work in progress. Considerable effort is needed to effectively criticize the
Manifesto, and we need volunteers to write about the policies. Feedback, to date, has been
minuscule. Time, I believe, has been kind to the effort.)
Our Principles are cut in stone; however, these suggested Policies are moot and, in
consultation with God, may change:
*This is a Judaic Christian Nation.
*English is our National Language.
*A strong National defense.
*Join the British Commonwealth.
26

*Establish a Christian Freedom Society International .
*Export all Muslims who follow Sharia law to a Muslim Nation of their choice.
*A Brotherhood to protect Jews and Christians where necessary.
*Defend the 2nd Amendment.
*Military segregation by sex in units below the Company or Squadron level.
* Fiscal responsibility.
*A flat national tax.
*Strengthen business monopoly laws.
*Support entrepreneurs.
*Support working people through profit sharing.
*Encourage technical and science education.
*The Restoration of NASA.
*The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to
the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.[79]
*Abolish the Department of Education.
* Ensure cultural decency.
*Reverse Roe v. Wade.
*Defend Traditional Marriage.
*Disenfranchise government employees from voting at their level of employment with the
tradeoff of increased Status and Income.
27

A Strong National Defense
“Peace is Our Profession” was the motto of the Strategic Air Command. “Heck, I reckon you
wouldn’t even be human beings if ya didn’t have some pretty strong feelings about nuclear combat.
But I want ya to remember one thing, that folks back home is a countin’ on ya, and by golly, we
ain’t about to let ‘em down.”
That was Aircraft Commander Major Kong (Slim Pickens) to his B-52 aircrew upon receipt of
orders to attack the Soviet Union, from the movie Doctor Strangelove. Liberals are expert at
making fun of, and satirizing our military, but our overwhelming strategic military offensive
capabilities brought us through the Cold War - what a miracle it ended the way it did thanks to our
military, President Reagan, and, yes, definitely, Premier Gorbachev and Perestroika deserve
gratitude also.
That democracies are capable of defending themselves was established by victories in World War 1
and World War II. There was a Declaration of War to send the American Expeditionary Force to
fight in France on April 6, 1917, but there has not been a Congressional Declaration of War since
the ones against Japan on December 8, 1941 and against Germany and Italy three days later. Since
that time there have been only “police actions” and “authorized use of force.”
Strategic technological advances in nuclear weapons and delivery systems have made general
declarations of war out of date because warfare cannot be “all out” against an equally armed enemy
or self-destruction is likely, and there are moral and political concerns about obliterating lesser
foes. Also, domestically, the major Party out of power may create confusion concerning military
responses.
Some strategic military minds logically think that if you are capable of defeating a significant
threat with little loss of life to the US military personnel, then, do it. Such thinking could have
resulted in a quick victory in Vietnam, but the Soviet Union and/or China might have escalated the
conflict to a height we were not willing to risk, and there was homeland dissension that our
involvement did not fit the parameters of a “just war.”
Those concerned with ethics and morality in war in international and religious organizations and
churches, at that time, constructed a “Just War Doctrine.” The Just War Doctrine criteria are:
There must be a just cause such as the defense of basic human rights, or the defense of the
innocent against an aggressor.
There must be a just intention such as seeking to restore order and justice.
The use of force must be ordered by a competent and lawful authority.
There must be a reasonable probability of success.
War must be the last resort.
There must be proportionality. That is, the response to the aggressor must not produce a greater
evil than the evil being eliminated. Or stated a little differently, the violence used in the war must
be proportional to the injury suffered.
An attacked nation would be prohibited from using force not necessary to obtain the limited
objective of addressing the injury suffered. That all sounds good in seminaries, and other halls of
learning, but not in the foxhole. The concept of proportionality is evil for three reasons:
28

♣ First - potential enemies, especially terrorists, are more likely to attack you if they believe
your response will be measured.
♣ Secondly - the expense of military response or retaliation would be vastly reduced if
responses were primarily strategic in regards to the responsible government.
♣ Thirdly - it is evil to put our armed forces in mortal jeopardy when we have the means to
destroy the enemy without killing our sons and daughters. Our government must ensure
that in foreign relations the government and citizens of potential enemies absolutely know
they are responsible and accountable for actions of their countrymen. There is no other way
to combat irresponsible terrorism, and assure peace.
THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS SHOULD DECLARE WAR AGAINST ALL
NATIONS RULED BY ISLAM.
Attitudes Formed by History
This Country was united in World War II, and people too young to personally remember World
War II by reading, listening to, and watching popular media would think there was hardly any
fear of losing the war, and everyone was having a good time. That impression is somewhat true
because every job, every person, was important, and all events were important in the war effort.
However, it was also unpatriotic to have bad morale, be gloomy, and not be positive. We boosted
each other, and supported the troops in the field completely. There was also much reason for an
underlying feeling that we could lose the war. By the end of 1941, the Nazi blitzkrieg had
captured most all of Europe. Field Marshall Rommel was poised to capture Cairo in North Africa,
and the Japanese were deep into China and Southeast Asia by December 1942.
Two heroic battles reversed the war in Europe: Field Marshall Montgomery led a counterattack at
El Alamein in Egypt in December 1942 with bagpipes cutting the morning air, and the Soviets
reversed the tide of the War on the Eastern front at the battle of Stalingrad the next month with
Commissar Khrushchev as the prime political operative successfully throwing thousands of
relatively untrained troops at the Nazi Panzer tanks. It was not until after those two battles that
there was anything in the War to cheer about.
On a personal note, we lost our first close family member when our father’s brother, B-17 Flying
Fortress Tail Gunner Sgt.David Cyrenus Turpin was shot down over Bremen in 1942. Uncle Dave
was able to bailout, but died shortly thereafter in a German hospital. (His body was returned after
the War.) Uncle, Sgt. Frank (Pat) Turpin was only 18 years old when his parachute failed to open
in 1943 bailing out of a B-25 in the South Pacific. Uncle, Captain Max Emerson Turpin, was a
B-24 Aircraft Commander when he was shot down over Berlin about a year before the War’s end
in 1944. Uncle Max bailed out successfully, and spent the rest of the War in a German prison
camp.
We didn’t know about the race for nuclear weapons during the War, and we didn’t know that
Norwegian patriots had attempted to blow up a Nazi “heavy water” plant in a suicide raid at
Telluride, Norway that was essential to German efforts to develop an atomic bomb. Miraculously,
the ski-shod Telluride raiders escaped, and with tears in my eyes, I saw them introduced on TV
coverage of the Winter Olympics at Lillehammer in 1994.
29

I was 16 years old when the war ended and would have been in the invasion of the Japanese home
islands except for the heroes of Telluride, Harry Truman, (thank you Harry) and all others who
supported the war effort 100 percent. Those in the Battle of the Bulge or those scheduled for the
invasion of Japan never bemoaned Dresden of Hiroshima. In August of ‘45, we sang “Atomic
power, atomic power, it was giv’n by the mighty hand of God.” Thank you Harry.
Politicians are not solely responsible. We ordinary citizens continue to second guess our few
brave political leaders. If we continue to seek political gain out of the deaths of our soldiers, we
do not deserve our democracy.
Two occasions of political courage I distinctly recall. First, in 1969, as Aircraft Commander of a
C-130E, I landed at Tay Ninh, South Vietnam, parked on the ramp, deplaned, and asked a soldier
about 12 body bags standing vertically around the sides of the bed of a truck. He said an
American Army patrol had been ambushed on the South Vietnam side of the border by an NVA
unit that had come across from Cambodia, and then returned to the sanctuary of Cambodia where
the NVA headquarters was garrisoned.
This rule of engagement was dictated by a US Congress that was influenced by the antiwar
movement, at the time led by liberal Senators, William Fulbright and Wayne Morris. It was a
graphic example of how the home front affects the boys, and now also girls, in the field. President
Nixon bravely went against Congress and ordered the invasion of Cambodia to clean out the safe
haven.
The consistency with which our Liberals were apologists for utopian international collectivism
placed them fully within the definition of Lenin’s “useful idiot” abettors. Fast forward to post
9/11 and the Liberals can no longer be useful idiots because their beloved Soviet Union went
belly up. Now, however, without their Communist friends, our liberal Statists are simply “simple
idiot control freaks.” I get very upset when their proclivities affect the soldiers in the field.
Astronaut John “Jack” Swigert, 1st Lt. Koren (Kay) Kolligian, and Donald (Don) I. Williamson
were USAF pilot-training classmates of mine graduating in Class 55C at Webb AFB TX in 1954.
Jack narrowly escaped circling the Moon “We’ve got a problem Houston” in Appollo 13 only to
die of cancer in 1983 just weeks before he would have been sworn-in as a U.S. Republican
Representative from Colorado. Kay was killed in (date) in a T-33 aircraft accident somewhere
over the Pacific off the coast of California. Don was my best friend in the Air Force, both
graduating from the University of Kentucky in 1953, together for USAF Pilot Primary Training at
Columbus AFB MS and together for Basic at Webb. Don flew F105s in an especially dangerous
mission, and was shot down over Hanoi, survived bailing out, but died later, early in the Vietnam
War. Jack, Kay, and Don are heroes of mine, and not one greater than the other. There were 43 in
our Class, and to the best of my knowledge 20 were “career,” and of those 20, seven died flying,
three in combat in Vietnam, and four in aircraft accidents. In the U.S. military culture all
contributions to the mission are regarded as equal, there is no bravery, but only levels of danger
and fear overcome by training, fraternity, and dedication to the mission. I personally; however,
tend to look up to “grunts” and Carrier Fighter Pilots, but they also serve who are only
inconvenienced by “bed-check Charlie.”
30

Dissent
Sadly, I must address the topic of dissent by the public, and the media, when our military is
engaged with the enemy. Liberals consistently cite Thomas Jefferson as having said, “Dissent is
the highest form of patriotism.” The problem with the citation is that the Jefferson Library at
Monticello states that this quotation is “spurious” and “should not be cited.”
Let us pretend that Jefferson did say it. Jefferson would have been referring to dissent to the
actions of George the King, and not to the actions of George, the leader of the Continental Army
and founder of our Country. Dissent against the Continental Army in Chief would have properly
been met with tar and feathers and riding those dissenters out of the village on a rail of a fence.
How disgustingly passive we have become in confronting those who are always confused about
whose side they are on. The “greatest generation” did not face this ambiguity, and our young men
and women should not have to face it today.
In a protracted war as the Vietnam War, and the War on Terrorism, we must ask what level of
dissent is deleterious to the military, and what level gives comfort and aid to the enemy which is
treasonous. It is confirmed by the North Vietnamese that the actions of Jane Fonda and John
Kerry, now our Secretary of State, encouraged them in their struggle, and I personally know
veterans of the Vietnam War who are still traumatized that fellow Americans vocally supported
the enemy when they were engaged in mortal combat.
With exceptional advances in the volume and speed of the flow of information today, the question
concerning treasonous acts are more salient than ever. We are not on the slippery slope to
authoritarianism when we question the effect of our dissenters on the terrorists, and the effect on
our sons and daughters on the battlefield. Our soldiers defend our right to dissent, but they should
not be expected to defend our right to foolishly turn against them.
In memory of all the countless fledging military aviators killed in training, I was highly offended
by the remarks by then DNC Chairman McAuliffe critical of the military service of Presidential
Candidate George ? Bush. President Bush completed USAF pilot training, was assigned to, and
flew high-performance supersonic aircraft. DNC Chairman McAuliffe would probably also
criticize the elder President  
Bush who was a highly decorated World War II Carrier Fighter Pilot where the tactics were
virtually a suicide mission. Incidentally, I have never been able to find any record of military
service in the biography of Terry McAuliffe.
In the ‘80s, Socialists, abetted by Jesuits, were particularly active in Central America saving the
downtrodden through Liberation Theology. There were gleeful reports by supporters in my
community that some Priests had “taken up arms.” That is not surprising because Liberation
theology has no restriction on the use of violence to gain advantages for the victims of society.
Such thinking, especially by Christian leaders such as the Reverend Wright, special spiritual
adviser to President Obama, is evil. We should all be concerned, if not terrified.
After the darkest days of World War II, we were elated as Prime Minister Churchill could finally
smile as he gave to us our V for victory hand sign. I am happy we “pass the peace” in my Church,
but I usually say “victory” and no one understands what I mean.
This is a country of religious freedom, and may it always be, Utopian pacifists, live in
reactionary communities. I support their right, but we don’t have to respect their decision. They
surely must think about their security gained by the blood of others. The American Friends
31

Service Committee purported to honor our fallen heroes in the war against terrorism by
displaying our heroes’ boots all over the Country. That is not just dissent; it is wicked to agonize
the spouses, sons, daughters, and parents. As conscientious objectors, they refuse to serve our
Country. We should expect them to at least sit quietly on the sideline. Violence to them is not
always bad though as they supported every Liberation Theology movement in Latin America. If
we subscribed to their philosophy we would be under (take your choice) elitist or egalitarian
totalitarianism, and we would be awaiting the victory of theocratic totalitarianism. My only
consolation in defeat would be the thought of their dilemma of conversion or beheading.
It may be laid down as a primary position, and the basis of our system, that every Citizen who
enjoys the protection of a Free government, owes not only a proportion of his property, but even
his personal services to the defense of it.
George Washington
The Media
Anne Frank wrote
“Despite everything I believe people are really good at heart.”
A book, much bigger than this paper, could be written about the perfidy of the liberal media by
astute media trackers. Here are just a few incidents of liberal bias.
In 1970, President Nixon went against Congress, in the highest example of civil disobedience,
ordered the invasion of Cambodia, and cleaned the NVA out of Cambodia. I have loved Richard
Nixon ever since. Liberal New York Times columnist, Anthony Lewis, vilified President Nixon
for this “hot pursuit,” and wrote that the President should be impeached. Fast forward to the 80s,
and Anthony Lewis stated that the Communist Sandinistas were completely justified in killing
Contras fleeing Nicaragua to Honduras -- in Honduras.
Liberation Theology is the militant extension of the social gospel, and this explains Marvin Olasky’s
definition of Liberation Theology as, “the worship of the poor.”
I would add diversity and inclusiveness.
Let’s stay with the New York Times and columnist Dowdy Maureeny. She is definitely Dowdy
Maureeny because she never misses an opportunity to write “Bushie,” and pervert every
conservative name in her flaccid articles. At the Bush Library dedication at Texas A&M
University, Colmmunist Dowd referred to the uniformed Texas A&M Corps of Cadets as “Brown
Shirts,” that is, the worst sort of Nazi thugs. I assume Ms. Dowd did not know that more Texas
A&M Aggies were killed defeating the Nazis than West Point graduates.
Her little gibe was unconscionable, but neither the State of Texas, nor A & M University, has
asked for an apology. An apology is way past due.
She and other liberals also enjoy little “gotchas” where the public is ignorant of the truth, such as
Governor Palin seeing Russia from Alaska. The Bering Strait, separating Russia from Alaska, is
hardly wider than the English Channel. Field Marshall Goering regularly looked at the White
Cliffs of Dover from Normandy. The most stupid ridicule; however, was directed at Vice
President Quail as if he were unfit for the Presidency. He misspelled the plural of “tomato” as
32

“tomatos.” Doesn’t everyone know that the plurals of tomato and potato are just alike, and both
add an “es” for the plural.
I heard President Obama say, “The Reverend Wright married Michelle and I,” with the emphasis
on the “I.” While we suffer from the abuse of personal pronouns, we also suffer because of an
illiterate President.
Rush Limbaugh has evened the playing field in the ridicule arena, and the libs thought they had a
antidote with “Air America” which lasted shorter than a Rush Limbaugh liberal lashing. A couple
of quotes from Air America: “Bush is the number one terrorist in the World,” and, “where was
NORAD on 9/11,” It is also despicable that they chose a name “Air America” under which name
a number of extremely brave Americans covertly, quietly, heroically died.
The Second Amendment
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a a free State, the right of the
people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”
The Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America
The Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America is often publicly
discussed, it is rarely recited and analyzed. When reading the Amendment, a reasonable citizen
would believe the Amendment is about a well regulated State Militia, as well as the right of the
people to keep and bear arms. The Second Amendment is constantly under attack because the
“common knowledge” is that the Second Amendment is solely about personal security, and this
is clearly a false premise. This misconception leads opponents of the Second Amendment to
believe the types of weapons the law allows can be restricted, or arms can be completely
banned, with reliance on the government for personal security. There is a need for action to
preserve the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment is clearly about the security of the
States in relation to the Federal Government. In the federalist system of government the States
retain “the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to
the States.” Most States of Texas do not have a State Militia independent of Federal
conscription due to the Dick Act of 1903, but there are currently paramilitary forces that appear
well trained and armed.
The following guiding format would ensure responsible gun ownership, and well regulated State
Reserve Militias:
1.Each gun owner is automatically a Member of the State Reserve Militia.
2. All able bodied gun owners will attend a semi-annual Reserve Militia drill encompassing gun
safety and other traditional military training. Non-attendance requires medical certification.
33

3. The chain of Command will be from the Governor to the Commander of the State Reserve
Militia, and subsequently through the State Reserve Militia chain of command.
The following benefits should be realized:
1. Gun owners will understand gun safety.
2. Gun owners will be observed at periodic State Reserve Militia drills.
3. State Reserve Militia Members can provide security in any venue as responsible gun
owners.
4. State Reserve Militia Members will provide a last resort against internal and external
threats to the State.
5. Unofficial armed militias will be integrated into the State Reserve Militia on an individual,
rigorous, subjective basis.
Fiscal Responsibility
Fiscal responsibility is lucidly simple. It consists of honesty, production, and a positive
attitude. In 1959, on the island of Cheju Do, Korea, I spoke with a Member of the Royal
Geographic Society who had spent a number of years in India. Although India had
developed economically since independence in 1947, a reasonable question in 1959 was
why India had made such little economic progress in the past twelve years. The Brit stated
that one major reason was a lack of honesty. His example of public dishonesty was his
assertion that to buy a ticket to ride the railroad in India, you had to first, bribe the ticket
agent to sell the ticket to you. Similarly, today, business enterprises in Mexico are greatly
hampered by criminal elements who want their cut without working for it by simply
stealing goods, or terror through arm twisting, knee breaking, or fear of death. It is a
legitimate function of government to protect the business climate of the Country, and
dishonesty, in many forms, appears to be on the increase in our formerly “handshake”
honest nation. 
Legitimate Government Functions
The government must be honest in its economic functions because economic progress is
made through increases in productivity, and increases in wealth come from entrepreneurs
believing the government will properly protect their patents, their transactions, and their
property.
34

Imagine a young married couple, after just welcoming their first offspring, planning to start
a new business because they believe, that through their technical innovation they can
assure their family’s economic future.
As entrepreneurs they would be organizing and operating a business in a hostile
environment which greatly increases the risks which already inherently exist. At one time,
in this Country, you could be confident that the Government, and your fellow citizens,
would treat you fairly and honestly.
Today, it takes a tremendous amount of guts because of vague governmental regulations,
rampant petty crime, and penalizing taxation.
Possibly, not all increases in wealth are due to technical innovation, but human society has
made exponential gains in material wealth since the industrial revolution. Logically, a
responsible government should greatly encourage engineering and science in all
educational institutions - even at the expense of social sciences - especially Journalism.
Journalism should be a post-graduate professional college like Medicine and Law. This
would in no way inhibit the freedom of information, but would let responsible media
leaders know who, when, how, where, and what they are hiring. There are too many “Jay
Walking All Stars,” who know little of history or geography, running around asking inane
questions with incorrect English.
Other than to encourage business and free enterprise, the government should not create
financial institutions like Fanny Mae and Freddie Mac. FDR created Fannie Mae in 1938
as part of the New Deal to provide banks with Federal money to finance home mortgages.
This was inherently wrong because the Federal government was intruding into the private
financial system and probably unconstitutional. The patriotism, positive attitude, and
production of WWII lifted us from the Great Depression so that there was not great harm
done to the economy.
In 1968, LBJ created Freddie Mac to compete with Fannie Mae! This “let it all hang out”
convivial couple enjoyed the fiction of private enterprise even though they profited from
an exemption from taxation, no government oversight, and the implied backing of the
federal government. Later WJC encouraged the expansion of the sub-prime mortgage
market, and the dear couple captured 90% of the nation’s prime mortgage market with the
taxpayers responsible for their debt which is equal to 46% of the national debt. All of these
governmental actions were taken by pragmatic, altruistic Saints. However, where the
government intrudes, the unscrupulous will grab the advantage and become low-class
wealthy folks. The Soviets (AKA Russians) were capable of learning, so why can’t our
Socialists learn?
35

Ensure Cultural Decency
How precious are Prince George and Princess Charlotte?
More precious than all of the Gold in the World.
36

How precious is any human baby regardless of status, race, color, or sex?
More precious than all of the gold in the World.
Nothing comes from nothing, nothing ever could
The Sound of Music
“So, something comes from Something, and the Something from which it comes is greater
than the something. You may look in the mirror and think “no great shakes,” “nothing to
brag about,” or feel guilty about a sense of pride in what you see. But, regardless of your
self-image, you are a Child of God, the greatest of God’s creation.
“ God is from everlasting to everlasting! There is no beginning as there is no ending.
Our thinking has been too small. Even if you accept the infinitesimally small beginning
of the “big bang” the ultimate reaction of the particles was rational. We are here,
rational beings still searching for our creator who has given us the freedom to evolve to
a place where we might know him.”
God might have imbued Man with perfection in an inalterable state from the beginning.
But, God did not choose for Man to be “perfect,” but to have the nature of God which is to
choose for yourself.”
God as Man and Man as God James William Turpin, my Father
God is for Freedom, but in an eschatological sense, Life precedes Freedom!
13 You, my brothers and sisters, were called to be free. But do not use your freedom to indulge
the flesh[a]; rather, serve one another humbly in love. 14 For the entire law is fulfilled in
keeping this one command: “Love your neighbor as yourself.”[b] 15 If you bite and devour
each other, watch out or you will be destroyed by each other.
Galatians 5:13-15
CFS believes the traditional family is the bulwark of society in maintaining a decent
culture. Human Life begins at inception, so protection of innocent Life is the linch-pin of
cultural decency.CFS is absolutely opposed to abortion except in the interest of saving the
Mother’s life. Rapists, but not the Child, will suffer greatly. Married and single expectant
Mothers will receive great care and attention.
Support of unmarried Mothers requires attention.
37

Civil unions between the same sex, and between people older than the adoption cutoff,
would be allowed. No governmental financial entitlements would be gained through a civil
union.
Men and women are different. Women are more practical, and seek security, They
traditionally looked for a husband to be “the man of the house,” but now the government
has assumed this roll, and this has become a great detriment to marriage, morality, and
almost everyones psyche. As a result, men’s biological needs are being sublimated, or
being satisfied in untraditional manners.
A disproportionate number of young women voted for Hitler and Obama.
When we think of great evil we think of the tyrants who have wantonly destroyed human lives/
human consciousness in great numbers. In modern history, we think of Hitler, Stalin, and Pol
Pot. Anne Frank, a highly literate, young Jewish girl, spoke for the aspirations of the six million
humans incarcerated and killed by Hitler and the Nazis during their control of Europe. The Jews
are admirable, intellectual, talented people who were innocent of any crimes against the
government or humanity. Yet, they were systematically killed.
Even more people were killed in Russia by Stalin and the Soviets, but not as systematically.
Peasant victims were forced into pogroms where they starved to death from Statist economic
policies. In Southeast Asia, Pol Pot, and the Communist Khmer Rouge in Cambodia, were
systematic, but casual, in the millions they killed. I recently talked with a Chinese woman, who
left the mainland at 29 years of age when she left China in 1990, who said, “Mao killed more
people than Hitler and Stalin did together.
Dr. Paul Davies says, “We are children of the universe -- animated stardust -- can nevertheless
reflect on the nature of that same universe, even to the extent of glimpsing the rules on which it
runs. How we have been linked on this cosmic dimension is a mystery. Yet, the linkage cannot
be denied.
What does it mean? What is man that we might be party to such a privilege? I cannot believe
that our existence in the universe is a mere quirk of fate, an accident of history, an accidental blip
in the cosmic drama. Our involvement is too intimate. Through conscious beings the universe
has generated self-awareness. This can be no trivial detail, no minor product mindless
purposeless forces. We are truly meant to be here.” Our understanding of science and our
religion are becoming deeper and closer as guided by the Holy Spirit.
Upon conception, all the elements of a truly unique (in time and space) human are present:
The highest manifestation of God’s creation is present.
38

For he who finds me finds life and obtains favor with the Lord; he who misses me injures
himself; all who hate me love death. O foolish men, pay attention.
Our Country has made significant improvements throughout our history to improve our physical
and moral-societal well-being; however, since January 22, 1973 the keystone of our culture and
moral fibre, respect for innocent life, was ripped from our hearts, and we have steadily
degenerated to a society unrecognized by those old enough to remember a healthier environment.
We need to be concerned that
we may be so morally weak we cannot resist God’s lurking Angel of Death -- Islam.
We humans are free to choose between good and evil. Inert matter cannot; lower biological life
cannot. To be human is to be free to choose and in choosing we may fully develop our full
human qualities in mind, body and spirit. Our human consciousness is unique, the most
advanced quality of the universe. Freedom develops it, chains destroy it.
And then came Roe versus Wade. I was opposed to the legalization of abortion. I heard more
than one mainstream Protestant Minister agonize through their dreaded Roe vs. Wade
sermon. They abhorred abortion, but came down on the side of Freedom, the freedom of choice.
I thought this strange, because these same Ministers were apologists for the active unfreedom of
totalitarian socialism during the Cold War, and I had heard a lot about Peace and Justice, but
never a mention of Freedom. But, I am the one with apparently conflicting beliefs.
I am not the victim of severe cognitive dissonance and logic, because Life is a necessary
predecessor of human Freedom, and even more dear. In the hierarchy of precious concepts, Life
simply precedes choice.
I believe that Life begins at conception and should be protected. I further believe that Roe vs.
Wade was the seminal (no pun intended) event for a degenerating culture because if we can
casually throw away the innocent, hardly anything else seems abnormal and immoral. If Life is
restored to its former correct status, then it is proper that we privately and collectively assist our
Life givers - our Mothers, especially those struggling with life's modern challenges. And only
then can we begin to discuss the survival of guilty life. Roe vs. Wade must be overturned for the
good of our culture, and John will leap for joy.
Approximately 3,000 innocent unborn (and sometimes born babies are intentionally killed each
day.
The highest entity of millions of years of painstaking evolution is present, the result of recursive
inanimate processing, and animate selection of fitness. Every cell of this neophyte human is
more complicated than a space shuttle, and enough DNA digital information to keep track of
every sin you have made in your life.
39

Jesus was incarnate by the Holy Spirit. Jesus is the Son of God, and the Son of Man. All babies
are the Son of Man, and the image of God. All babies host the Holy Spirit.
Weep now for the talent that was lost when God’s chosen people were murdered, for the millions
of Russians who were starved, for the Cambodians machine gunned, and the 50,000,000 babies
murdered since Roe v. Wade. The Holy Spirit is in that minuscule, completely conceived zygote,
and capable of being Christ our Savior.
It is pathetic that abortion is the linchpin of liberalism. We live in a culture that has made normal
the whimsical taking of innocent life. What is most difficult to accept is that a political party and
their sycophantic religious leaders have accepted a philosophy of death. Some “mainline”
protestant denominations who teach justice and peace have discovered freedom only when it
comes to the issue of abortion.
But, why this exceptional concern about the Holy Spirit? Why? Because God is a jealous God,
and Humankind is playing God by destroying God’s greatest creation which will be eternally
evolving to commune with God. Human Consciousness with guidance through the Holy Spirit
with our minds and bodies strive to enhance Life. The Statists, Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, and a few
others, should be concerned.
The Holy Spirit is present.
God’s image is present.
God, through his Son, weeps.
The question concerning the Holy Spirit is much than the issue of abortion. The Social Gospel
has become the Graven Image of the modern Church. We are all “victims” in the social gospel.
That is contrary to “the Holy Spirit is in you.”
40

Enlistment
How wonderful it is that nobody need wait a
single moment before starting to improve the
World. Anne Frank
We are CFS Neighbors:
♣ Christians and Jews, etc.
♣ Democrats, Libertarians, and Republicans.
As a Neighbor, I will fight for:
CFS Principles and Policies:
Freedom
Free Enterprise
Human Rights
Freedom of Religion
Right to Life
41

CFS
Christian Freedom Society
Membership
(Enter as much information as desired)
Print Name: _______________________________
StreetAddress: _____________________________
City: ___________________________
State: ____ Zip Code: ___________
Home Phone: _____________________________
Cell Phone: _______________________________
Email Address:_____________________________
Add to Mailing List: Yes ___ No ___
By my signature, I am joining the: CFS
Neighbor Signature:_________________________
42

Opportunities for CFS Neighbors
(Committee Chairs will be elected by Committee Members.)
Board Chair Bill Turpin
Vice Board Chair/Organization Edmond Quillen
Webmaster
Secretary/Membership
Treasurer
Chair, Accounting
Chair, Public Relations
Chair, Social Media
Chair, Rally Planning
Chair, Ambassadors
CFS Committees
(Five Neighbors on each Committee)
Accounting
Public Relations
Social Media
Rally Planning
Presenters
Music
CFS Advisers
Software
Legal
Military
43

Parliamentarian
Theological
Women’s Concerns
CFS Writers
Judaic Christian Nation
National language
Join the British Commonwealth
CFSBrotherhood
CFS Sisters ____________________________
Traditional Marriage
Department of Education
Flat Tax
Monopoly Laws
Support Labor
Small Businesses
Profit Sharing
National Public Servants
CFS International
CFS Ambassadors
CFS Presenters
44

Christian Freedom Society

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

Similar to Christian Freedom Society

Similar to Christian Freedom Society (20)

Christian Freedom Society