SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 1
Cooper & Dunham Scores Hat-Trick in Federal Circuit Court of Appeals<br />Lawyers at New York's Cooper & Dunham LLP have won three patent infringement cases in the past four months in the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington.<br />In February 2010, SEB, a French home appliance manufacturer, successfully maintained a Judgment awarding more than $5 million in damages against Pentalpha, a Chinese competitor.  A jury found that Pentalpha infringed SEB's patent on a deep fryer.  The Federal Circuit denied a petition for rehearing in May.  SEB was represented at the trial and on appeal by Cooper & Dunham lawyers Norman Zivin, Wendy Miller and Gregory Carbo.<br />In March, Playoff, a sports trading card creator, successfully defended a grant of summary judgment in its favor holding two patents owned by Media Technologies on memorabilia cards to be invalid for obviousness. A petition for rehearing was denied by the Court of Appeals in May.  Playoff was represented in the District Court and in the Federal Circuit by Cooper & Dunham's Norman Zivin, Eric Kirsch and Tonia Sayour.<br /> <br />In June, the Federal Circuit upheld a Judgment and an award of attorneys' fees in favor of magnetic snap maker Romag Fasteners for defending a patent infringement case brought by Advanced Magnetic Closures. The Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court’s holding after trial that Advanced's patent on a magnetic snap fastener was unenforceable for inequitable conduct and that Advanced had engaged in litigation misconduct.  Romag was represented at the trial and on appeal by Cooper & Dunham's Norman Zivin, Wendy Miller and Tonia Sayour.<br />Citations to these three Federal Circuit decisions are:<br />SEB S.A. v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc., 594 F.3d 1360 (Fed. Cir. 2010);<br />Media Technologies Licensing, LLC v. Playoff Corp., 596 F.3d 1334 (Fed. Cir. 2010); and<br />Advanced Magnetic Closures, Inc. v. Rome Fastener Corp., 2010 WL 2331169 (C.A.Fed. (N.Y.)).<br />Cooper & Dunham LLP was established in 1887.  The firm exclusively practices intellectual property law. <br />

More Related Content

Similar to Press Release June 22 2010

PA Superior Court Decision: Northern Forests II, Inc. v. Keta Realty Company
PA Superior Court Decision: Northern Forests II, Inc. v. Keta Realty CompanyPA Superior Court Decision: Northern Forests II, Inc. v. Keta Realty Company
PA Superior Court Decision: Northern Forests II, Inc. v. Keta Realty CompanyMarcellus Drilling News
 
PELTON PowerPoint: ABA Cyberspace Institute 2011-01-28
PELTON PowerPoint: ABA Cyberspace Institute 2011-01-28PELTON PowerPoint: ABA Cyberspace Institute 2011-01-28
PELTON PowerPoint: ABA Cyberspace Institute 2011-01-28erikpelton
 
Decision by U.S. District Judge David N. Hurd on Force Majeure Case in New Yo...
Decision by U.S. District Judge David N. Hurd on Force Majeure Case in New Yo...Decision by U.S. District Judge David N. Hurd on Force Majeure Case in New Yo...
Decision by U.S. District Judge David N. Hurd on Force Majeure Case in New Yo...Marcellus Drilling News
 
Motschenbacher v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 498 F.2d 821 (19.docx
Motschenbacher v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 498 F.2d 821 (19.docxMotschenbacher v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 498 F.2d 821 (19.docx
Motschenbacher v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 498 F.2d 821 (19.docxgilpinleeanna
 
SKGF_Advisory_The Blackberry Saga_2006
SKGF_Advisory_The Blackberry Saga_2006SKGF_Advisory_The Blackberry Saga_2006
SKGF_Advisory_The Blackberry Saga_2006SterneKessler
 
TR Article CMP3322_040816
TR Article CMP3322_040816TR Article CMP3322_040816
TR Article CMP3322_040816Amanda Hollis
 
Mbu 2520 spring 2018 chapter 15
Mbu 2520 spring 2018 chapter 15Mbu 2520 spring 2018 chapter 15
Mbu 2520 spring 2018 chapter 15Eric Griffin
 
GRIFFIN COPYRIGHT MBU 2520 FALL 2019 chapter 15
GRIFFIN COPYRIGHT MBU 2520 FALL 2019 chapter 15GRIFFIN COPYRIGHT MBU 2520 FALL 2019 chapter 15
GRIFFIN COPYRIGHT MBU 2520 FALL 2019 chapter 15Eric Griffin
 
Dovenberg v. Carter Order
Dovenberg v. Carter OrderDovenberg v. Carter Order
Dovenberg v. Carter OrderSeth Row
 
Spring 2009 appellate brief assignment u.s. v. apollo energies (prosecution)
Spring 2009 appellate brief assignment   u.s. v. apollo energies (prosecution)Spring 2009 appellate brief assignment   u.s. v. apollo energies (prosecution)
Spring 2009 appellate brief assignment u.s. v. apollo energies (prosecution)Lyn Goering
 
Umg Recordings Inc V Veoh Networks Inc
Umg Recordings Inc V Veoh Networks IncUmg Recordings Inc V Veoh Networks Inc
Umg Recordings Inc V Veoh Networks IncJoe Gratz
 
Exhibits to the Motion to Add 200 New Plaintiffs to Armando Montelongo RICO L...
Exhibits to the Motion to Add 200 New Plaintiffs to Armando Montelongo RICO L...Exhibits to the Motion to Add 200 New Plaintiffs to Armando Montelongo RICO L...
Exhibits to the Motion to Add 200 New Plaintiffs to Armando Montelongo RICO L...Jean Norton, MSTC, Real Estate Investor
 

Similar to Press Release June 22 2010 (20)

PA Superior Court Decision: Northern Forests II, Inc. v. Keta Realty Company
PA Superior Court Decision: Northern Forests II, Inc. v. Keta Realty CompanyPA Superior Court Decision: Northern Forests II, Inc. v. Keta Realty Company
PA Superior Court Decision: Northern Forests II, Inc. v. Keta Realty Company
 
PELTON PowerPoint: ABA Cyberspace Institute 2011-01-28
PELTON PowerPoint: ABA Cyberspace Institute 2011-01-28PELTON PowerPoint: ABA Cyberspace Institute 2011-01-28
PELTON PowerPoint: ABA Cyberspace Institute 2011-01-28
 
Decision by U.S. District Judge David N. Hurd on Force Majeure Case in New Yo...
Decision by U.S. District Judge David N. Hurd on Force Majeure Case in New Yo...Decision by U.S. District Judge David N. Hurd on Force Majeure Case in New Yo...
Decision by U.S. District Judge David N. Hurd on Force Majeure Case in New Yo...
 
Trial Results
Trial ResultsTrial Results
Trial Results
 
Ftc national
Ftc nationalFtc national
Ftc national
 
Motschenbacher v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 498 F.2d 821 (19.docx
Motschenbacher v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 498 F.2d 821 (19.docxMotschenbacher v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 498 F.2d 821 (19.docx
Motschenbacher v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 498 F.2d 821 (19.docx
 
SKGF_Advisory_The Blackberry Saga_2006
SKGF_Advisory_The Blackberry Saga_2006SKGF_Advisory_The Blackberry Saga_2006
SKGF_Advisory_The Blackberry Saga_2006
 
TR Article CMP3322_040816
TR Article CMP3322_040816TR Article CMP3322_040816
TR Article CMP3322_040816
 
Mbu 2520 spring 2018 chapter 15
Mbu 2520 spring 2018 chapter 15Mbu 2520 spring 2018 chapter 15
Mbu 2520 spring 2018 chapter 15
 
GRIFFIN COPYRIGHT MBU 2520 FALL 2019 chapter 15
GRIFFIN COPYRIGHT MBU 2520 FALL 2019 chapter 15GRIFFIN COPYRIGHT MBU 2520 FALL 2019 chapter 15
GRIFFIN COPYRIGHT MBU 2520 FALL 2019 chapter 15
 
Dovenberg v. Carter Order
Dovenberg v. Carter OrderDovenberg v. Carter Order
Dovenberg v. Carter Order
 
Motion to Add 200 New Plaintiffs to Armando Montelongo RICO Lawsuit
Motion to Add 200 New Plaintiffs to Armando Montelongo RICO LawsuitMotion to Add 200 New Plaintiffs to Armando Montelongo RICO Lawsuit
Motion to Add 200 New Plaintiffs to Armando Montelongo RICO Lawsuit
 
Spring 2009 appellate brief assignment u.s. v. apollo energies (prosecution)
Spring 2009 appellate brief assignment   u.s. v. apollo energies (prosecution)Spring 2009 appellate brief assignment   u.s. v. apollo energies (prosecution)
Spring 2009 appellate brief assignment u.s. v. apollo energies (prosecution)
 
Federal Circuit Review | August 2013
Federal Circuit Review | August 2013Federal Circuit Review | August 2013
Federal Circuit Review | August 2013
 
Umg Recordings Inc V Veoh Networks Inc
Umg Recordings Inc V Veoh Networks IncUmg Recordings Inc V Veoh Networks Inc
Umg Recordings Inc V Veoh Networks Inc
 
Law360 PJ Article
Law360 PJ ArticleLaw360 PJ Article
Law360 PJ Article
 
Graham v. john deere co. patent infringement
Graham v. john deere co. patent infringementGraham v. john deere co. patent infringement
Graham v. john deere co. patent infringement
 
B243062 cpr marina
B243062 cpr marinaB243062 cpr marina
B243062 cpr marina
 
Exhibits to the Motion to Add 200 New Plaintiffs to Armando Montelongo RICO L...
Exhibits to the Motion to Add 200 New Plaintiffs to Armando Montelongo RICO L...Exhibits to the Motion to Add 200 New Plaintiffs to Armando Montelongo RICO L...
Exhibits to the Motion to Add 200 New Plaintiffs to Armando Montelongo RICO L...
 
Scott McMillan San Diego Attorney TRO.pdf
Scott McMillan San Diego Attorney TRO.pdfScott McMillan San Diego Attorney TRO.pdf
Scott McMillan San Diego Attorney TRO.pdf
 

Press Release June 22 2010

  • 1. Cooper & Dunham Scores Hat-Trick in Federal Circuit Court of Appeals<br />Lawyers at New York's Cooper & Dunham LLP have won three patent infringement cases in the past four months in the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington.<br />In February 2010, SEB, a French home appliance manufacturer, successfully maintained a Judgment awarding more than $5 million in damages against Pentalpha, a Chinese competitor. A jury found that Pentalpha infringed SEB's patent on a deep fryer. The Federal Circuit denied a petition for rehearing in May. SEB was represented at the trial and on appeal by Cooper & Dunham lawyers Norman Zivin, Wendy Miller and Gregory Carbo.<br />In March, Playoff, a sports trading card creator, successfully defended a grant of summary judgment in its favor holding two patents owned by Media Technologies on memorabilia cards to be invalid for obviousness. A petition for rehearing was denied by the Court of Appeals in May. Playoff was represented in the District Court and in the Federal Circuit by Cooper & Dunham's Norman Zivin, Eric Kirsch and Tonia Sayour.<br /> <br />In June, the Federal Circuit upheld a Judgment and an award of attorneys' fees in favor of magnetic snap maker Romag Fasteners for defending a patent infringement case brought by Advanced Magnetic Closures. The Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court’s holding after trial that Advanced's patent on a magnetic snap fastener was unenforceable for inequitable conduct and that Advanced had engaged in litigation misconduct. Romag was represented at the trial and on appeal by Cooper & Dunham's Norman Zivin, Wendy Miller and Tonia Sayour.<br />Citations to these three Federal Circuit decisions are:<br />SEB S.A. v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc., 594 F.3d 1360 (Fed. Cir. 2010);<br />Media Technologies Licensing, LLC v. Playoff Corp., 596 F.3d 1334 (Fed. Cir. 2010); and<br />Advanced Magnetic Closures, Inc. v. Rome Fastener Corp., 2010 WL 2331169 (C.A.Fed. (N.Y.)).<br />Cooper & Dunham LLP was established in 1887. The firm exclusively practices intellectual property law. <br />