SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 24
Moderator : Dr Isha Dahal
Presenter : Dr Samrat Shrestha
• Role of intraoperative cholangiography in patients
undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for
acute gallstone pancreatitis: Is MRCP needed?
• Journal: The Annals of The Royal College of
Surgeons of England
• PUBLISHED ON: JULY 3, 2019
Introduction
• IOC is sporadically used in patients undergoing
laparoscopic cholecystectomy to delineate common
bile duct anatomy and exclude retained stones.
• In patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis, IOC may
reduce need for preoperative MRCP.
• IfthereisevidenceofCBDobstructionand/or
cholangitisoninitialultrasound, theInternational
Association ofPancreatology(IPA)andAmerican
PancreaticAssociation (APA)guidelinesrecommend
ERCP tocleartheduct.
• However,inabsenceofultrasound-provenCBD
stones,aMRCP isoftenundertaken tofurther
assessCBD.
• IOC has been shown to be sensitive and
specific at detecting CBD stones as well as
safely delineating biliary anatomy.
• A positive IOC enables surgeon to perform an
immediate CBD exploration, stone clearance
and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a single
procedure, thereby reducing lengthy time
delays from unnecessary MRCP
Hypothesis
• In patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis,
IOC reduces the need for preoperative MRCP.
Design of study
• Retrospective study
Methodology
• A retrospective study was undertaken of all
patients under-going laparoscopic
cholecystectomy at St James’ University Hospital,
over a 15-year period between October 1998 and
December 2013
• 2215 patients underwent laparoscopic
cholecystectomy between October 1998 and
December 2013
• 113 patients (of whom 77 were women) with a
mean age of 54 years (range 16–88 years) were
diagnosed with acute gallstone pancreatitis.
Inclusion criteria
• All patients with a diagnosis of gallstone pancreatitis
who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy were
included in the study.
Exclusion criteria
• Patients who underwent a preoperative ERCP
were excluded from further analysis as
choledocholithiasis had already been
established and treated.
Statistical analysis
• Sample size 113
• Statistical analysis was performed using Prism
version 6.0c (GraphPad Software, La Jolla,
California).
• The Mann–Whitney U test was used to
compare continuous data
• P-value of less than 0.05 was considered
statistically significant.
Result
• 2215 patients underwent laparoscopic
cholecystectomy in 15-year period.
• Of these, 113 patients were diagnosed with acute
gallstone pancreatitis, with a mean age of 54 years
• 11 patients had no IOC performed either due to
unavailability of a radiographer or because of
technical issues.
• Median time interval between date of
diagnosis of acute gallstone pancreatitis and
laparoscopic cholecystectomy was five days
(range 0–21 days).
• 102 patients underwent an IOC.
• In 89 cases (87%), this was found to be
normal.
• 13 patients were found to have
choledocholithiasis at time of laparoscopic
cholecystectomy.
• 11 of these patients were managed
successfully via concomitant CBD exploration
while remaining 2 patients underwent a
postoperative ERCP.
• Of the 36 patients who underwent a
preoperative MRCP, 12 of them were shown to
have choledocholithiasis.
• At surgery, 11 of these patients were found to
have a clear duct.
• 4 of the 24 patients with normal preoperative
MRCP findings were shown to have
choledocholithiasis on IOC.
Results
Conclusion
• Majority of patients presenting with acute
gallstone pancreatitis  managed with
laparoscopic cholecystectomy and IOC,
without requiring a preoperative MRCP.
• Cost savings due to shorter inpatient stays and
reduced use of MRCP.
• IOC reduces time between diagnosis of acute
gallstone pancreatitis and laparoscopic
cholecystectomy, enabling timely surgical
management within recommended
guidelines.
• 59 patients with symptomatic biliary stones or cholecystitis were recruited
in this study.
• Preoperative MRCP and IOC were performed
• PPV for IOC was 88% and for MRCP was 43%.
• Diagnostic accuracy of IOC and MRCP were 98% and 85% respectively,
suggesting that IOC is much more diagnostically accurate.
• 420 who underwent IOC were reviewed and met criteria for
the study.
• 70 patients had preoperative MRCP.
• Accuracy of MRCP when compared with IOC was 70%.
 Conclusions
• MRCP has a high rate of false normal results compared with
IOC and is not as accurate as more invasive techniques.
• No need for preoperative MRCP in patients with suspected
choledocholithiasis caused by stones
• 425 consecutive patients who underwent IOC during
cholecystectomy were included in this study.
• MRCP was performed preoperatively for bile duct evaluation
in all patients.
• MRCP preoperatively identified 6 (1.4 %) patients with
abnormal biliary systems and 56 with CBD stones, which were
endoscopically removed.
• The success rate of IOC was 93.8 % (399/425).
• Abnormalities of the biliary system were detected in 12
patients (12/399, 3.0 %) and CBD stones in 8 (8/399, 2.0 %).
• IOC is indicated even after preoperative
sphincterotomy for CBD stones.
• In this study, it resulted in a 12.5 % incidence
of persistent stones after sphincterotomy.
• IOC plays an additional role in detecting CBD
stones and in revealing abnormalities of biliary
tree in patients whose biliary tree was
preoperatively evaluated by MRCP
IAP GUIDELINES
 Cholecystectomy during index admission for mild biliary pancreatitis appears
safe
 Interval cholecystectomy after mild biliary pancreatitis is associated with a
substantial risk of readmission for recurrent biliary events, especially
recurrent biliary pancreatitis.
 Cholecystectomy should be delayed in patients with peripancreatic
collections until collections either resolve or if they persist beyond 6 weeks,
at which time cholecystectomy can be performed safely.
 In patients with biliary pancreatitis who have undergone sphincterotomy
and are fit for surgery, cholecystectomy is advised, because ERCP and
sphincterotomy prevent recurrence of biliary pancreatitis but not gallstone
related gallbladder disease, i.e. biliary colic and cholecystitis
THANK YOU

More Related Content

Similar to journal club IOC VS MRCP.pptx

Prospective evaluation of single operator peroral cholangioscopy in liver
Prospective evaluation of single operator peroral cholangioscopy in liverProspective evaluation of single operator peroral cholangioscopy in liver
Prospective evaluation of single operator peroral cholangioscopy in liver
Dr. Zubin Sharma M.D.
 
Standard versus tubeless mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Standard versus tubeless mini percutaneous nephrolithotomyStandard versus tubeless mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Standard versus tubeless mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Youttam Laudari
 
Art 3 a10.1007-2fs00464-011-2009-2
Art 3 a10.1007-2fs00464-011-2009-2Art 3 a10.1007-2fs00464-011-2009-2
Art 3 a10.1007-2fs00464-011-2009-2
Sameh Naguib
 
Management of concomitant gall bladder and common bile duct stones, single st...
Management of concomitant gall bladder and common bile duct stones, single st...Management of concomitant gall bladder and common bile duct stones, single st...
Management of concomitant gall bladder and common bile duct stones, single st...
wael mansy
 

Similar to journal club IOC VS MRCP.pptx (20)

ERCP.ppt
ERCP.pptERCP.ppt
ERCP.ppt
 
Approach to Common Bile Duct Stones
Approach to Common Bile Duct StonesApproach to Common Bile Duct Stones
Approach to Common Bile Duct Stones
 
Past present future - laparoscopic colorectal surgery
Past present future  -  laparoscopic colorectal surgeryPast present future  -  laparoscopic colorectal surgery
Past present future - laparoscopic colorectal surgery
 
Prospective evaluation of single operator peroral cholangioscopy in liver
Prospective evaluation of single operator peroral cholangioscopy in liverProspective evaluation of single operator peroral cholangioscopy in liver
Prospective evaluation of single operator peroral cholangioscopy in liver
 
Journal club LCBDE+LC vs ERCP+LC
 Journal club LCBDE+LC vs ERCP+LC Journal club LCBDE+LC vs ERCP+LC
Journal club LCBDE+LC vs ERCP+LC
 
Carcinoma Gall Bladder- A histological surprise
Carcinoma Gall Bladder- A histological surpriseCarcinoma Gall Bladder- A histological surprise
Carcinoma Gall Bladder- A histological surprise
 
Standard versus tubeless mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Standard versus tubeless mini percutaneous nephrolithotomyStandard versus tubeless mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy
Standard versus tubeless mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy
 
Art 3 a10.1007-2fs00464-011-2009-2
Art 3 a10.1007-2fs00464-011-2009-2Art 3 a10.1007-2fs00464-011-2009-2
Art 3 a10.1007-2fs00464-011-2009-2
 
CBD Stent PPT.pptx
CBD Stent PPT.pptxCBD Stent PPT.pptx
CBD Stent PPT.pptx
 
CBD stones/ Choledocholithiais / Biliary stones
CBD stones/ Choledocholithiais / Biliary stonesCBD stones/ Choledocholithiais / Biliary stones
CBD stones/ Choledocholithiais / Biliary stones
 
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Laparoscopic CholecystectomyLaparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
 
thesis presentation.pptx
thesis presentation.pptxthesis presentation.pptx
thesis presentation.pptx
 
Laparoscopic CBD Exploration
Laparoscopic CBD ExplorationLaparoscopic CBD Exploration
Laparoscopic CBD Exploration
 
Management of concomitant gall bladder and common bile duct stones, single st...
Management of concomitant gall bladder and common bile duct stones, single st...Management of concomitant gall bladder and common bile duct stones, single st...
Management of concomitant gall bladder and common bile duct stones, single st...
 
Bile duct injury
Bile duct injuryBile duct injury
Bile duct injury
 
Laparoscopic kidney surg
Laparoscopic kidney surgLaparoscopic kidney surg
Laparoscopic kidney surg
 
Single-stage laparoscopic management for concomitant gallstones and common bi...
Single-stage laparoscopic management for concomitant gallstones and common bi...Single-stage laparoscopic management for concomitant gallstones and common bi...
Single-stage laparoscopic management for concomitant gallstones and common bi...
 
Laparoscopic gastrectomies for cancer
Laparoscopic gastrectomies for cancerLaparoscopic gastrectomies for cancer
Laparoscopic gastrectomies for cancer
 
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Inflammatory Bowel DiseaseInflammatory Bowel Disease
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
 
Klatskin
KlatskinKlatskin
Klatskin
 

Recently uploaded

Call Girls Aurangabad Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Aurangabad Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Aurangabad Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Aurangabad Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Dipal Arora
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Call Girls Tirupati Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Tirupati Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Tirupati Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Tirupati Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
O898O367676 Call Girls In Ahmedabad Escort Service Available 24×7 In Ahmedabad
O898O367676 Call Girls In Ahmedabad Escort Service Available 24×7 In AhmedabadO898O367676 Call Girls In Ahmedabad Escort Service Available 24×7 In Ahmedabad
O898O367676 Call Girls In Ahmedabad Escort Service Available 24×7 In Ahmedabad
 
Mumbai ] (Call Girls) in Mumbai 10k @ I'm VIP Independent Escorts Girls 98333...
Mumbai ] (Call Girls) in Mumbai 10k @ I'm VIP Independent Escorts Girls 98333...Mumbai ] (Call Girls) in Mumbai 10k @ I'm VIP Independent Escorts Girls 98333...
Mumbai ] (Call Girls) in Mumbai 10k @ I'm VIP Independent Escorts Girls 98333...
 
VIP Hyderabad Call Girls Bahadurpally 7877925207 ₹5000 To 25K With AC Room 💚😋
VIP Hyderabad Call Girls Bahadurpally 7877925207 ₹5000 To 25K With AC Room 💚😋VIP Hyderabad Call Girls Bahadurpally 7877925207 ₹5000 To 25K With AC Room 💚😋
VIP Hyderabad Call Girls Bahadurpally 7877925207 ₹5000 To 25K With AC Room 💚😋
 
Book Paid Powai Call Girls Mumbai 𖠋 9930245274 𖠋Low Budget Full Independent H...
Book Paid Powai Call Girls Mumbai 𖠋 9930245274 𖠋Low Budget Full Independent H...Book Paid Powai Call Girls Mumbai 𖠋 9930245274 𖠋Low Budget Full Independent H...
Book Paid Powai Call Girls Mumbai 𖠋 9930245274 𖠋Low Budget Full Independent H...
 
VIP Service Call Girls Sindhi Colony 📳 7877925207 For 18+ VIP Call Girl At Th...
VIP Service Call Girls Sindhi Colony 📳 7877925207 For 18+ VIP Call Girl At Th...VIP Service Call Girls Sindhi Colony 📳 7877925207 For 18+ VIP Call Girl At Th...
VIP Service Call Girls Sindhi Colony 📳 7877925207 For 18+ VIP Call Girl At Th...
 
Call Girls Gwalior Just Call 8617370543 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Gwalior Just Call 8617370543 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Gwalior Just Call 8617370543 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Gwalior Just Call 8617370543 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
Call Girls in Delhi Triveni Complex Escort Service(🔝))/WhatsApp 97111⇛47426
Call Girls in Delhi Triveni Complex Escort Service(🔝))/WhatsApp 97111⇛47426Call Girls in Delhi Triveni Complex Escort Service(🔝))/WhatsApp 97111⇛47426
Call Girls in Delhi Triveni Complex Escort Service(🔝))/WhatsApp 97111⇛47426
 
Call Girls Ooty Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Ooty Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Ooty Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Ooty Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
Call Girls Cuttack Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Cuttack Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Cuttack Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Cuttack Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
Night 7k to 12k Chennai City Center Call Girls 👉👉 7427069034⭐⭐ 100% Genuine E...
Night 7k to 12k Chennai City Center Call Girls 👉👉 7427069034⭐⭐ 100% Genuine E...Night 7k to 12k Chennai City Center Call Girls 👉👉 7427069034⭐⭐ 100% Genuine E...
Night 7k to 12k Chennai City Center Call Girls 👉👉 7427069034⭐⭐ 100% Genuine E...
 
Call Girls Siliguri Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Siliguri Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Siliguri Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Siliguri Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
Call Girls Aurangabad Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Aurangabad Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Aurangabad Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Aurangabad Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
Premium Bangalore Call Girls Jigani Dail 6378878445 Escort Service For Hot Ma...
Premium Bangalore Call Girls Jigani Dail 6378878445 Escort Service For Hot Ma...Premium Bangalore Call Girls Jigani Dail 6378878445 Escort Service For Hot Ma...
Premium Bangalore Call Girls Jigani Dail 6378878445 Escort Service For Hot Ma...
 
Premium Call Girls Cottonpet Whatsapp 7001035870 Independent Escort Service
Premium Call Girls Cottonpet Whatsapp 7001035870 Independent Escort ServicePremium Call Girls Cottonpet Whatsapp 7001035870 Independent Escort Service
Premium Call Girls Cottonpet Whatsapp 7001035870 Independent Escort Service
 
Top Rated Bangalore Call Girls Mg Road ⟟ 9332606886 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine S...
Top Rated Bangalore Call Girls Mg Road ⟟   9332606886 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine S...Top Rated Bangalore Call Girls Mg Road ⟟   9332606886 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine S...
Top Rated Bangalore Call Girls Mg Road ⟟ 9332606886 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine S...
 
Top Quality Call Girl Service Kalyanpur 6378878445 Available Call Girls Any Time
Top Quality Call Girl Service Kalyanpur 6378878445 Available Call Girls Any TimeTop Quality Call Girl Service Kalyanpur 6378878445 Available Call Girls Any Time
Top Quality Call Girl Service Kalyanpur 6378878445 Available Call Girls Any Time
 
Call Girls Kochi Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Kochi Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service AvailableCall Girls Kochi Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Call Girls Kochi Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
 
Top Rated Hyderabad Call Girls Erragadda ⟟ 9332606886 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine ...
Top Rated  Hyderabad Call Girls Erragadda ⟟ 9332606886 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine ...Top Rated  Hyderabad Call Girls Erragadda ⟟ 9332606886 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine ...
Top Rated Hyderabad Call Girls Erragadda ⟟ 9332606886 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine ...
 
(👑VVIP ISHAAN ) Russian Call Girls Service Navi Mumbai🖕9920874524🖕Independent...
(👑VVIP ISHAAN ) Russian Call Girls Service Navi Mumbai🖕9920874524🖕Independent...(👑VVIP ISHAAN ) Russian Call Girls Service Navi Mumbai🖕9920874524🖕Independent...
(👑VVIP ISHAAN ) Russian Call Girls Service Navi Mumbai🖕9920874524🖕Independent...
 

journal club IOC VS MRCP.pptx

  • 1. Moderator : Dr Isha Dahal Presenter : Dr Samrat Shrestha
  • 2. • Role of intraoperative cholangiography in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute gallstone pancreatitis: Is MRCP needed? • Journal: The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England • PUBLISHED ON: JULY 3, 2019
  • 3. Introduction • IOC is sporadically used in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy to delineate common bile duct anatomy and exclude retained stones. • In patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis, IOC may reduce need for preoperative MRCP.
  • 4. • IfthereisevidenceofCBDobstructionand/or cholangitisoninitialultrasound, theInternational Association ofPancreatology(IPA)andAmerican PancreaticAssociation (APA)guidelinesrecommend ERCP tocleartheduct. • However,inabsenceofultrasound-provenCBD stones,aMRCP isoftenundertaken tofurther assessCBD.
  • 5. • IOC has been shown to be sensitive and specific at detecting CBD stones as well as safely delineating biliary anatomy. • A positive IOC enables surgeon to perform an immediate CBD exploration, stone clearance and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a single procedure, thereby reducing lengthy time delays from unnecessary MRCP
  • 6. Hypothesis • In patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis, IOC reduces the need for preoperative MRCP.
  • 7. Design of study • Retrospective study
  • 8. Methodology • A retrospective study was undertaken of all patients under-going laparoscopic cholecystectomy at St James’ University Hospital, over a 15-year period between October 1998 and December 2013 • 2215 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy between October 1998 and December 2013 • 113 patients (of whom 77 were women) with a mean age of 54 years (range 16–88 years) were diagnosed with acute gallstone pancreatitis.
  • 9. Inclusion criteria • All patients with a diagnosis of gallstone pancreatitis who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included in the study.
  • 10. Exclusion criteria • Patients who underwent a preoperative ERCP were excluded from further analysis as choledocholithiasis had already been established and treated.
  • 11. Statistical analysis • Sample size 113 • Statistical analysis was performed using Prism version 6.0c (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, California). • The Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare continuous data • P-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
  • 12. Result • 2215 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 15-year period. • Of these, 113 patients were diagnosed with acute gallstone pancreatitis, with a mean age of 54 years • 11 patients had no IOC performed either due to unavailability of a radiographer or because of technical issues.
  • 13. • Median time interval between date of diagnosis of acute gallstone pancreatitis and laparoscopic cholecystectomy was five days (range 0–21 days).
  • 14. • 102 patients underwent an IOC. • In 89 cases (87%), this was found to be normal. • 13 patients were found to have choledocholithiasis at time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. • 11 of these patients were managed successfully via concomitant CBD exploration while remaining 2 patients underwent a postoperative ERCP.
  • 15. • Of the 36 patients who underwent a preoperative MRCP, 12 of them were shown to have choledocholithiasis. • At surgery, 11 of these patients were found to have a clear duct. • 4 of the 24 patients with normal preoperative MRCP findings were shown to have choledocholithiasis on IOC.
  • 17. Conclusion • Majority of patients presenting with acute gallstone pancreatitis  managed with laparoscopic cholecystectomy and IOC, without requiring a preoperative MRCP. • Cost savings due to shorter inpatient stays and reduced use of MRCP.
  • 18. • IOC reduces time between diagnosis of acute gallstone pancreatitis and laparoscopic cholecystectomy, enabling timely surgical management within recommended guidelines.
  • 19. • 59 patients with symptomatic biliary stones or cholecystitis were recruited in this study. • Preoperative MRCP and IOC were performed • PPV for IOC was 88% and for MRCP was 43%. • Diagnostic accuracy of IOC and MRCP were 98% and 85% respectively, suggesting that IOC is much more diagnostically accurate.
  • 20. • 420 who underwent IOC were reviewed and met criteria for the study. • 70 patients had preoperative MRCP. • Accuracy of MRCP when compared with IOC was 70%.  Conclusions • MRCP has a high rate of false normal results compared with IOC and is not as accurate as more invasive techniques. • No need for preoperative MRCP in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis caused by stones
  • 21. • 425 consecutive patients who underwent IOC during cholecystectomy were included in this study. • MRCP was performed preoperatively for bile duct evaluation in all patients. • MRCP preoperatively identified 6 (1.4 %) patients with abnormal biliary systems and 56 with CBD stones, which were endoscopically removed. • The success rate of IOC was 93.8 % (399/425). • Abnormalities of the biliary system were detected in 12 patients (12/399, 3.0 %) and CBD stones in 8 (8/399, 2.0 %).
  • 22. • IOC is indicated even after preoperative sphincterotomy for CBD stones. • In this study, it resulted in a 12.5 % incidence of persistent stones after sphincterotomy. • IOC plays an additional role in detecting CBD stones and in revealing abnormalities of biliary tree in patients whose biliary tree was preoperatively evaluated by MRCP
  • 23. IAP GUIDELINES  Cholecystectomy during index admission for mild biliary pancreatitis appears safe  Interval cholecystectomy after mild biliary pancreatitis is associated with a substantial risk of readmission for recurrent biliary events, especially recurrent biliary pancreatitis.  Cholecystectomy should be delayed in patients with peripancreatic collections until collections either resolve or if they persist beyond 6 weeks, at which time cholecystectomy can be performed safely.  In patients with biliary pancreatitis who have undergone sphincterotomy and are fit for surgery, cholecystectomy is advised, because ERCP and sphincterotomy prevent recurrence of biliary pancreatitis but not gallstone related gallbladder disease, i.e. biliary colic and cholecystitis