Next JS and Express are two popular web development frameworks, but which one is right for your project? Find out in this comprehensive comparison that covers everything from features to learning curve: https://www.frontendmag.com/insights/next-js-vs-express/

1. Home  Insights  Next JS vs Express: An In-Depth Comparison for Developers
Next JS vs Express: An In-Depth Comparison
for Developers
AUTHOR
Tien Nguyen
DATE
April 29, 2023
CATEGORY
Insights
As a web developer, you may be familiar with Next JS and Express, two widely used
     
 
This website uses cookies to ensure you get
the best experience on our website.
Learn more
x

2. JavaScript frameworks for building web applications. However, how do they di몭er, and
which framework should you use for your next project?
In this post, we will compare Next JS vs Express by examining their features,
functionality, popularity, performance, scalability, security, compatibility, learning
curve, community support, and resources. Additionally, we will look at the advantages
and disadvantages of each framework, as well as their best use cases.
My goal is to provide you with a comprehensive understanding of Next JS vs Express,
so you can make an informed decision about which framework to use for your project.
Let’s dive in!
Table of Contents
1. What is Next JS?
2. What is Express?
3. Comparing Next JS vs Express
4. Features and Functionality
4.1. Routing
4.2. Middleware
4.3. Templating
4.4. Static Site Generation
4.5. Server-side Rendering
4.6. API Development
5. Popularity
6. Performance
6.1. Rendering
6.2. Optimization
7. Scalability
7.1. Serverless Functions
7.2. Edge Network
7.3. Incremental Static Regeneration
7.4. Load Balancing
8. Security
8.1. Authentication
8.2. Authorization
8.3. Encryption
8.4. Sanitization
9. Comparability
9.1. Front-end Libraries
9.2. Back-end Technologies
9.3. Testing Tools
Got it

3. What is Next JS?
Next JS, developed by Vercel, is a React-based framework for building server-side
rendered and statically generated web applications. It o몭ers a minimalist approach to
handling routing, performance optimization, and improving the developer experience.
Some key features of Next JS include:
Zero setup: You can start building your application without con몭guring any tools or
libraries, using the 몭lesystem as an API.
Server-side rendering (SSR): You can render pages on the server and send them
as HTML to the browser, improving SEO and performance.
Static site generation (SSG): You can pre-render pages at build time and serve
them as static 몭les, reducing server load and latency.
Single-page application (SPA): You can create dynamic pages that update without
reloading, enhancing user interactivity.
10. Learning Curve
10.1. Documentation
10.2. Setup
10.3. Syntax
10.4. Ecosystem
11. Pros and Cons of Next JS
12. Pros and Cons of Express
13. Best Use Cases for Next JS
14. Best Use Cases for Express
15. Next JS vs Express: Conclusion
16. FAQs

4. reloading, enhancing user interactivity.
Faster application development: You can bene몭t from automatic code splitting,
image optimization, font optimization, script optimization, and other built-in
optimizations that improve web vitals.
Node.js and Edge Runtimes: You can build scalable solutions with serverless
functions, and deliver fast dynamic, personalized content with the edge network.
CSS Support: You can use CSS modules, Sass, PostCSS, and CSS-in-JS to style
your components.
API Routes: You can build API endpoints to securely connect with third-party
services and consume from your frontend.
Middleware: You can run code before a request is completed for authentication,
A/B testing, localization, and more.
React Server Components: You can use server-몭rst components that stream HTML
to the browser and reduce bundle size.
Next JS is a 몭exible and powerful framework that combines the simplicity and elegance
of React with the speed and performance of server-side rendering and static site
generation. It is ideal for building fully interactive, highly dynamic, and performant web
applications for individual developers or larger teams.
What is Express?
Express is a Node.js web framework that enables you to create backend web
applications and APIs. It is designed to be fast, minimalist, and unopinionated, meaning
it does not impose any speci몭c structure or conventions on your application. Instead, it
provides a set of middleware functions and routing features that you can use as you
wish. Some of the key features of Express include:

5. Robust routing: You can de몭ne handlers for requests with di몭erent HTTP verbs and
URL paths, using a simple and expressive syntax.
HTTP helpers: You can use various methods and properties on the request and
response objects to simplify common tasks such as redirection, caching, sending
몭les, and setting headers.
View system: You can integrate with various template engines to generate dynamic
HTML responses by inserting data into templates.
Middleware: You can use or write functions that have access to the request and
response objects, and can modify them or execute any code before passing control
to the next middleware or route handler.
Error handling: You can de몭ne error-handling middleware functions that catch and
handle any errors that occur during the request-response cycle.
Express is a 몭exible and powerful framework that gives you full control over your
application logic and behavior. Whether you are building a simple website, a complex
web service, or anything in between, you can use Express to create fast and reliable
backend solutions.
Comparing Next JS vs Express
The following table summarizes the key di몭erences between Next JS and Express:
Aspe
ct
Next JS Express
Featu
res &
Funct
ionali
ty
Full-stack framework that
builds on React. Built-in routing,
middleware, and API system.
Supports SSG and SSR.
Backend framework that enables building
APIs and server-side applications.
Customizable routing and middleware. No
built-in support for SSG.
Popul
arity
105K GitHub stars, 23.7K forks,
4.3M weekly downloads, 29.9K
Stack Over몭ow questions.
60.7K GitHub stars, 10.4K forks, 29.6M
weekly downloads, 92.8K Stack Over몭ow
questions.
Perfo
rman
ce
Supports SSR, SSG, and CSR.
Built-in optimizations, including
automatic code splitting and
image optimization.
No built-in rendering system. Can
integrate with React or other libraries.
Need to implement own optimizations.

6. Aspe
ct
Next JS Express
Scala
bility
Supports serverless functions
and edge network deployment
for building scalable APIs.
Can use various middleware and tools for
enhancing API development, such as
authentication and validation.
Secur
ity
No major security vulnerabilities
reported.
No major security vulnerabilities reported.
Comp
atibili
ty
Built on React. Supports many
modern web technologies.
Compatible with various template
engines. Can integrate with React or
other front-end libraries.
Learn
ing
Curve
Moderate. Requires knowledge
of React and Next JS-speci몭c
concepts.
Moderate. Requires knowledge of Node.js
and Express-speci몭c concepts.
In the next sections, we will compare each aspect in more detail.
Features and Functionality
Next JS and Express are both JavaScript frameworks that enable building web
applications and APIs, with distinct features and functionality suited to di몭erent use
cases.
Routing
Next JS has a 몭le-system-based routing system that maps the 몭les and folders in the
pages directory to corresponding URL paths. It also supports dynamic routes, catch-all
routes, optional catch-all routes, and API routes.
Express enables de몭ning handlers for requests with di몭erent HTTP verbs and URL
paths. You can use parameters, query strings, regular expressions, middleware, and
routers to customize your routing logic.
Middleware
Next JS has a built-in middleware system for running code before a request is
completed, with support for custom middleware functions or third-party middleware
modules.
Express has a large ecosystem of middleware modules that enhances its functionality,

7. in addition to custom middleware functions or modules.
Templating
Next JS uses React as its view engine, allowing for JSX syntax to write components
that can be rendered on the server or client. You can use CSS modules, Sass, PostCSS,
CSS-in-JS, and other modern web technologies to style components.
Express can integrate with various template engines (such as Pug, EJS, Handlebars,
etc.) to generate dynamic HTML responses by inserting data into templates. You can
also use modern web technologies to style templates.
Static Site Generation
Next JS supports static site generation (SSG), which pre-renders pages at build time
and serves them as static 몭les, reducing server load and latency. Incremental static
regeneration (ISR) can also update static pages without rebuilding the entire site.
Express does not support static site generation by default but can use third-party tools
or plugins to generate static 몭les.
Server-side Rendering
Next JS supports server-side rendering (SSR), rendering pages on the server and
sending them as HTML to the browser, improving SEO and performance. React Server
Components can also reduce bundle size.
Express supports server-side rendering but requires integration with React or other
front-end libraries.
API Development
Next JS has a built-in API routing system that allows creating API endpoints securely
connecting with third-party services and consuming from the front end. It can also use
serverless functions and edge network deployment to build scalable APIs.
Express is a backend framework that enables building APIs and server-side
applications with full control over application logic and behavior. It can also use various
middleware and tools to enhance API development, such as authentication, validation,
error handling, etc.

8. In summary, Next JS and Express have di몭erent features and functionality, making
them suitable for di몭erent use cases. Next JS enhances web applications by leveraging
the bene몭ts of React and providing improved SEO, development experience, and
performance as a full-stack framework. It also has a built-in API routing system that
can replace Express for simple APIs.
Express is a backend framework that enables building APIs and server-side
applications with full control over application logic and behavior. It also integrates well
with React or other front-end libraries for rendering pages on the server or client.
Popularity
In this section, we will compare some indicators of their popularity and adoption.
GitHub stars are a measure of how much developers appreciate a project on GitHub
and can indicate its popularity and in몭uence in the open-source community. As of April
29, 2023, Express has 60.7K stars and Next JS has 105K stars.
GitHub forks are a measure of how many developers have copied or cloned a project,
indicating their interest in contributing to or modifying it. Express has 10.4K forks and
Next JS has 23.7K forks.
NPM downloads are a measure of how many times a package or module has been
downloaded from the NPM registry, indicating its adoption among developers and
users. Express has 29.6M weekly downloads, while Next JS has 4.3M weekly
downloads.
Stack Over몭ow questions are a measure of how much interest or demand there is for a
topic among developers and users. There are 92.8K questions tagged with
and 29.9K questions tagged with .
Based on these indicators, Express is more popular and adopted than Next JS among
developers and users. However, Next JS is gaining ground consistently in the
JavaScript community.
Performance
Both Next JS and Express are high-performance frameworks that can be used to build
web applications and APIs quickly. However, they have di몭erent approaches and trade-
express
next.js

9. o몭s that a몭ect their performance in various scenarios.
Rendering
Next JS supports three modes of rendering, including server-side rendering (SSR),
static site generation (SSG), and client-side rendering (CSR). Each mode of rendering
has its own advantages and disadvantages.
SSR improves SEO and performance but can increase the server load and response
time, especially for dynamic pages.
SSG reduces server load and latency but can increase the build time and complexity,
particularly for large sites.
CSR enhances user interactivity but can increase the bundle size and initial loading
time, especially for complex pages.
In contrast, Express does not have a built-in rendering system, but you can integrate
with React or other front-end libraries to render your pages on the server or the client.
However, you need to implement your own logic and tools to optimize your rendering
performance, such as caching, code splitting, image optimization, etc.
Optimization
Next JS provides several built-in optimizations that improve the performance of your
web applications, such as automatic code splitting, image optimization, font
optimization, script optimization, and more. It also supports incremental static
regeneration (ISR), which allows you to update static pages without rebuilding your
entire site.
In contrast, Express does not have any speci몭c optimization features, but it is fast and
lightweight by design. You can also use various middleware and tools to enhance the
performance of your Express applications, such as compression, caching, logging, etc.
Scalability
In terms of scalability, Next JS and Express both o몭er di몭erent strategies and
advantages that a몭ect their scalability in di몭erent scenarios. Let’s compare some of
the aspects of scalability of Next JS and Express:
Serverless Functions

10. Next JS o몭ers serverless functions, which run on demand and scale automatically
based on the number of requests. These functions can be used to create API
endpoints, handle custom logic, or perform background tasks. They are deployed to the
edge network, which is closer to your users and can deliver faster responses.
On the other hand, Express doesn’t o몭er serverless functions by default, but you can
use third-party tools or platforms to create and deploy them.
Edge Network
Next JS supports edge network deployment, which allows you to deliver fast dynamic
and personalized content to your users. This network serves static assets, caches API
responses, runs middleware, and executes serverless functions. It’s distributed across
multiple regions and data centers, which makes it capable of handling high tra몭c and
reducing latency.
In contrast, Express doesn’t support edge network deployment by default, but you can
use third-party tools or platforms to deploy your applications.
Incremental Static Regeneration
Next JS supports incremental static regeneration (ISR), which allows you to update
static pages without rebuilding your entire site. ISR regenerates static pages on
demand based on a revalidation interval or a trigger event. This ensures that your static
pages are always up to date and consistent with your data sources.
In comparison, Express doesn’t o몭er incremental static regeneration, but you can use
third-party tools or plugins to generate static 몭les.
Load Balancing
Express o몭ers load balancing, which distributes incoming requests across multiple
servers or instances of your application. This improves the performance, availability,
and reliability of your application. Load balancing can also handle failover scenarios or
perform rolling updates.
However, Next JS doesn’t o몭er load balancing by default, but you can use third-party
tools or platforms to achieve it.

11. Security
Next JS and Express are both secure frameworks that o몭er protection against
common threats and vulnerabilities to your web applications and APIs. However, their
security levels and support may vary based on the situation.
Authentication
Next JS provides various authentication methods and providers, including
email/password, social login, magic link, SMS, etc. NextAuth.js is a library that
integrates with Next JS and provides a complete authentication solution, but you can
also use custom authentication logic or third-party authentication services to
implement your authentication strategy.
Express does not have a built-in authentication system but can integrate with various
authentication libraries and services like Passport.js, Auth0, Firebase, etc. You can also
use custom authentication logic or middleware to implement your own authentication
strategy.
Authorization
Next JS supports various authorization methods and mechanisms, including roles,
permissions, access control lists (ACLs), etc. NextAuth.js provides a built-in
authorization system that works with various providers and databases, but you can
also use custom authorization logic or third-party authorization services to implement
your authorization strategy.
Express also does not have a built-in authorization system but can integrate with
various authorization libraries and services like Casbin, Keycloak, Okta, etc. You can also
use custom authorization logic or middleware to implement your own authorization
strategy.
Encryption
Next JS supports various encryption methods and algorithms, such as AES, RSA, SHA,
etc. NextAuth.js provides a built-in encryption system that works with various
providers and databases, but you can also use custom encryption logic or third-party
encryption services to implement your encryption strategy.
Express does not have a built-in encryption system, but it can integrate with various

12. encryption libraries and services like Crypto.js, bcrypt.js, AWS KMS, etc. You can also
use custom encryption logic or middleware to implement your encryption strategy.
Sanitization
Next JS supports various sanitization methods and techniques, including HTML
escaping, XSS prevention, CSRF protection, etc. NextAuth.js provides a built-in
sanitization system that works with various providers and databases, but you can also
use custom sanitization logic or third-party sanitization services to implement your
sanitization strategy.
Express also does not have a built-in sanitization system, but it can integrate with
various sanitization libraries and services like Helmet.js, express-validator, express-
sanitizer, etc. You can also use custom sanitization logic or middleware to implement
your own sanitization strategy.
Comparability
Next JS and Express are both versatile frameworks that can be used with a variety of
technologies and platforms. However, their compatibility and support levels vary, which
a몭ects their applicability in di몭erent scenarios.
Front-end Libraries
Next JS uses React as its view engine and supports JSX syntax to write components.
In contrast, Express does not have a built-in view engine, but it can integrate with
several front-end libraries or frameworks, including React, Angular, Vue, and Svelte. To
make them work, you need to use additional con몭gurations or plugins.
Back-end Technologies
Next JS supports various back-end technologies and platforms, such as Node.js,
MongoDB, PostgreSQL, Firebase, and AWS. You can use NextAuth.js, a library that
integrates with Next JS and provides a complete authentication solution, or you can
implement custom back-end logic or use third-party back-end services.
Express also supports various back-end technologies and platforms. You can use
Passport.js, an authentication library that integrates with Express and provides a
complete authentication solution, or you can implement custom back-end logic or

13. services.
Testing Tools
Next JS o몭ers various testing tools and frameworks, such as Jest, Enzyme, React
Testing Library, and Cypress. You can use Next.js Testing Utilities, a library that
provides helpful testing utilities for Next JS applications, or you can implement custom
testing logic or use third-party testing services.
Similarly, Express supports various testing tools and frameworks, such as Jest, Mocha,
Chai, Supertest, and Cypress. You can implement custom testing logic or use third-
party testing services to test your Express applications.
Learning Curve
Next JS and Express are both frameworks that are enjoyable and accessible to use,
although they di몭er in their di몭culty and complexity, a몭ecting their learning curve in
di몭erent scenarios.
Documentation
Next JS o몭ers a comprehensive and well-written documentation that covers all the
features and concepts of the framework. Additionally, it has a tutorial, a blog, a
showcase, and a community page that provide further resources and examples.
Express, on the other hand, has a concise and clear documentation that covers the
core features and concepts of the framework. It also o몭ers a guide, an API reference, a
wiki, and a community page that provide additional resources and examples.
Setup
Next JS has a zero-setup con몭guration that allows you to start building your web
applications without any hassle. It also has a CLI tool that helps you create and manage
your projects.
Express, in contrast, has a minimalist con몭guration that allows you to customize your
web applications according to your needs. It also has a CLI tool that helps you create
and manage your projects.
Syntax

14. Next JS employs JSX syntax to write your components and render them on the server
or the client. Moreover, it supports TypeScript, Sass, PostCSS, CSS-in-JS, and other
modern web technologies out of the box.
In comparison, Express employs JavaScript syntax to write your handlers and
middleware for requests with various HTTP verbs and URL paths. Additionally, it
supports ES6+, TypeScript, Sass, PostCSS, CSS-in-JS, and other modern web
technologies with some additional setup.
Ecosystem
Next JS boasts a rich ecosystem of plugins and integrations that extend its
functionality.
Express also has a vast ecosystem of middleware and modules that enhance its
functionality.
Pros and Cons of Next JS
Advantages of Next JS include:
Improved SEO performance: Next JS SSR and SSG to enhance performance and
SEO. The routing system also directs Google on how to crawl your site.
Cross-platform compatibility: Next JS supports various platforms and devices,
including web, mobile, desktop, and TV, enabling you to create responsive
applications that work on di몭erent screen sizes.
Data security: Next JS supports various encryption methods, including AES, RSA,
and SHA. NextAuth.js provides a built-in encryption system, and you can use
custom encryption logic or third-party encryption services.
Easy maintenance: Next JS has a zero-con몭guration setup and CLI tool, allowing
you to create web applications without dealing with complex con몭gs.
Size-responsive applications: Next JS supports automatic code splitting,
optimization for images, fonts, and scripts, and React Server Components. These
features help you create size-responsive applications that load faster and consume
less bandwidth.
Fast refresh rate: Next JS supports fast refresh, which automatically updates your
page in the browser without losing component state when you make changes to

15. your code.
Great community support: Next JS has a comprehensive documentation, a
tutorial, a blog, a showcase, and a community page that provide additional
resources and examples. You can also 몭nd many plugins and integrations that
extend its functionality.
Disadvantages of Next JS include:
Routing limitations: Next JS has a 몭le-system-based routing system that may limit
customization or the use of dynamic routes. You may need to use a Node.js server or
third-party tools or platforms to use dynamic routes.
Build time complexity: SSG can increase the build time and complexity, especially
for large sites with many pages or dynamic content.
Learning curve: Next JS requires some knowledge of Node.js, SSR, SSG, API
routing, etc., which can be challenging for beginners or developers who are not
familiar with these technologies.
Overall, Next JS is a powerful and versatile framework that can help you create high-
quality web applications and static websites.
Pros and Cons of Express
Express provides you with complete control over the logic and behavior of your web
applications and APIs. Here are some of the advantages and disadvantages of using
Express:
Pros of Express:
Flexibility: Express is a minimalist and unopinionated framework that allows you to
customize your application logic and behavior according to your needs and
preferences.
Simplicity: Express has a simple and clear syntax that makes it easy to write and
read code. You can also use modern web technologies with some additional setup.
Extensibility: Express has a vast ecosystem of middleware and modules that
enhance its functionality. You can create and use your own middleware and modules
or choose from pre-existing ones for various purposes.
Performance: Express is designed to be fast and lightweight. It supports various

16. optimization techniques and tools that can improve performance.
Cons of Express:
Lack of structure: Express does not provide a built-in structure or convention for
organizing 몭les and folders in projects. You have to decide how to structure your
projects.
Lack of features: Express does not have a built-in feature set that covers all the
common needs of web development. You have to rely on third-party middleware and
modules or implement your own logic for authentication, authorization, encryption,
sanitization, etc.
Lack of support: Express does not have an o몭cial support team or channel that you
can contact for help or guidance. You have to rely on community support from Stack
Over몭ow, GitHub issues, forums, blogs, etc.
Lack of updates: Express has not been updated frequently or regularly in the past
few years. There is no clear roadmap or timeline for the next major version of
Express (5.x), which has been in alpha stage since 2017.
In summary, Express is a powerful and versatile framework that can help you create
web applications and APIs with full control over your application logic and behavior.
Best Use Cases for Next JS
Next JS is a versatile tool that allows you to build fast, SEO-friendly, and user-friendly
web applications and static websites. Here are some of the di몭erent use cases and
scenarios in which Next JS can be a suitable choice:
E-commerce: Next JS can handle large e-commerce sites with many products and
categories.
Blogs: Next JS is an excellent choice for building blogs with many articles and
posts.
Entertainment: Next JS is a powerful tool for building entertainment platforms that
stream a lot of videos, music, and games.
Community-driven web apps: Next JS is an ideal choice for building web apps with
many users, pro몭les, and interactions.
News apps: Next JS is an excellent choice for building news apps that deliver many
articles, stories, and media.

17. Best Use Cases for Express
Express o몭ers you full control over your application logic and behavior. Its versatility
makes it a suitable choice for various types of projects and scenarios. Below are some
of the best use cases for Express:
APIs: Express is great for building RESTful APIs that follow standard HTTP methods
and conventions or GraphQL APIs that manipulate data using a query language and
schema.
Microservices: Express is an ideal choice for building scalable, resilient, and
independent microservices that can communicate with each other using HTTP
requests or message queues.
Real-time applications: Express is an excellent choice for building real-time
applications that use WebSocket or Socket.io protocols or Pub/Sub or Event-driven
architectures.
Full-stack applications: Express is versatile enough to build full-stack applications
that use JavaScript as the primary language across the stack and MongoDB or other
databases as the data layer.
Next JS vs Express: Conclusion
In conclusion, both Next JS and Express are powerful JavaScript frameworks that can
be used to build web applications and APIs. While they have some similarities, they also
have signi몭cant di몭erences in terms of features and functionality, popularity,
performance, scalability, security, comparability, and learning curve.
Next JS is a full-stack framework that enhances React by improving the SEO,
development experience, and performance of web applications. It supports static site
generation (SSG) and server-side rendering (SSR), making it ideal for building fast,
scalable, and SEO-friendly web applications. It also has a built-in API routing system
that can replace Express for simple APIs.
On the other hand, Express is a backend framework that enables building APIs and
server-side applications with full control over application logic and behavior. It
integrates well with React or other front-end libraries for rendering pages on the server
or client. It has a large ecosystem of middleware modules that enhance its functionality
and is widely adopted and popular among developers and users.

18. In choosing between Next JS and Express, you should consider your project
requirements, goals, and constraints, as well as your familiarity with React and Node.js.
While Next JS o몭ers more out-of-the-box features and optimizations, it may have a
steeper learning curve and be less suitable for complex and custom applications.
Express, on the other hand, o몭ers more 몭exibility and control over application logic and
behavior but may require more setup and con몭guration.
Ultimately, both frameworks have their strengths and weaknesses, and the choice
between them depends on the speci몭c needs and context of the project. By
understanding their di몭erences and trade-o몭s, you can make informed decisions and
build robust and scalable web applications and APIs.
If you’re interested in exploring more comparisons between popular web development
frameworks, I recommend checking out some of my other blog posts:
Next JS vs Angular
Svelte vs Next JS
Nest JS vs Node JS
Thanks for reading!
FAQs
Q: What is the main di몭erence between Next JS and Express?
A: Next JS and Express are both JavaScript frameworks, but they have di몭erent
features and functionality. Next JS is a React framework that enhances the SEO,
development experience, and performance of web applications. It also has a built-in
API routing system that can replace Express for simple APIs. Express, on the other
hand, is a backend framework that enables building APIs and server-side applications
with full control over application logic and behavior. It also integrates well with React or
other front-end libraries for rendering pages on the server or client.
Q: Which one is more popular, Next JS or Express?
A: Based on indicators such as GitHub stars, forks, NPM downloads, and Stack Over몭ow
questions, Express is more popular and adopted than Next JS among developers and
users. However, Next JS is gaining ground consistently in the JavaScript community.

19. Q: Which one has better performance, Next JS or Express?
A: Both Next JS and Express are high-performance frameworks that can be used to
build web applications and APIs quickly. However, they have di몭erent approaches and
trade-o몭s that a몭ect their performance in various scenarios. Next JS provides several
built-in optimizations that improve the performance of your web applications, such as
automatic code splitting, image optimization, font optimization, script optimization,
and more. It also supports incremental static regeneration (ISR), which allows you to
update static pages without rebuilding your entire site. Express, on the other hand,
does not have any speci몭c optimization features, but it is fast and lightweight by
default.
Q: Which one is easier to learn, Next JS or Express?
A: The learning curve of Next JS and Express may vary depending on your background,
experience, and project requirements. Next JS is built upon React, so if you already
know React, it will be easier for you to learn Next JS. However, if you are not familiar
with React, you may need to learn it 몭rst before diving into Next JS. Express is a
straightforward and 몭exible framework that requires basic knowledge of JavaScript
and Node.js. You can start building simple APIs and gradually add more complexity as
you learn more about middleware, routing, and other concepts.
Q: Can Next JS and Express be used together?
A: Yes, you can use Next JS and Express together to build hybrid web applications that
combine the bene몭ts of both frameworks. For example, you can use Next JS for
rendering pages and handling API requests that require server-side rendering or static
site generation, and use Express for more complex API logic and middleware that
require full control over the server-side behavior. However, keep in mind that this
approach may introduce some overhead and complexity, so use it only if necessary.
PREVIOUS ARTICLE
WebSocket vs SignalR: An In-Depth
Comparison

20. You may also like
WebSocket vs SignalR: An In-
Depth Comparison
WebSocket vs Webhook: A
Comprehensive Comparison
Guide
SignalR vs RabbitMQ: An In-
Depth Comparison for Choosing
the Right Messaging Tool
LEAVE A REPLY
Comment:
Name:*
Email:*
Website:
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
POST COMMENT
Recent posts
WebSocket vs SignalR: An In-Depth Comparison
April 26, 2023

21. WebSocket vs Webhook: A Comprehensive Comparison Guide
April 22, 2023
Is Flutter Good for Web Development? Here’s What You Need
to Know
April 15, 2023
Is Flutter Easy to Learn? What You Need to Know Before
Diving In
April 9, 2023
SignalR vs RabbitMQ: An In-Depth Comparison for Choosing
the Right Messaging Tool
April 2, 2023
FRONTEND MAG INFORMATION

22. Discover and share the exciting world of front-
end web development to build stunning
websites, apps, and services with cutting-edge
technologies.
About
Contact
Terms and Conditions
Privacy Policy
CONTACT
 hello@frontendmag.com
 Hanoi, Vietnam
CONNECT
   
Copyright © 2022-2023 Frontend Mag. All Rights Reserved.