The document discusses future prospects and challenges for biotherapeutics. It begins by defining biotherapeutics as products produced using living cells or organisms, such as recombinant hormones, vaccines, monoclonal antibodies, growth factors, and gene and cell therapies. It then contrasts biotherapeutics, biosimilars, and generics. The document outlines the complex manufacturing process for biotherapeutics and challenges in characterizing their large, complex structures. It concludes by discussing switching and interchangeability studies required to demonstrate a biosimilar is as safe and effective as the reference biologic.
Human-Centred Design in Biopharma: Need of the hour
1. Issue 29 2017 www.pharmafocusasia.com
Wearables in Clinical Trials
Where we are & where we are going
Patient Recruitment in Asia
Reducing the clinical burden
2. kromasil@akzonobel.com
India & Middle-East: +91 22 2778 7338
Worldwide: +46 31 58 70 00
www.kromasil.com
For the purification of
• Peptides
• Small proteins
• Oligonucleotides
• Small molecules
HPLC columns and bulk media for
analysis and API purification by
industrial-scale chromatography
High performance
spherical silica
3. Foreword
Prasanthi Sadhu
Editor
market. Design thinking enables organisations to
bring-in cross-departmental innovation, deliver
value-added solutions and unleash market
opportunities. HCD brings together company
leadership both strategic and operational,
stakeholders that work in a collaborative
environment with uniform goals and unified
approach to solutions. This process includes
defining roles and responsibilities for all those
involved.
By integrating human-centred research, the
molecular development process benefts from
parallel human-centred research throughout
the discovery and development phase. This
also helps in increasing the productivity by
choosing the most useful potential medicines
among many alternatives and help articulate
real value to users for a given medicine. By
supporting human-centred research, R&D
organisations can signifcantly augment their
tools for guiding personalised medicine and
create robust portfolios of products that users
strongly value.
In the cover story of this issue, authors
Andrew Parsonsand Susan Cruse suggest that
a human-centred experiential learning process
to develop leaders, managers, and employees
is quintessential for success. Paying attention to
the ‘human’ will enable development of solutions
for addressing leadership challenges.
If we hope to create something of lasting value,
we need to start with what people want — not
just with what’s technically possible! IDEO, a
global design firm.
Innovation and technology advancements play
a key role in product design and development,
but it is imperative that companies bring in a
human-centred approach. The advent of new
technologies such as virtual reality, augmented
reality, digital assistant etc. throws light on
integrating those into human lives for better
application and experience. Think of a Fit-bit –
it tracks one’s physical activity, sleep and throws
inputs on areas of improvement thus helping an
individual stay physically active. Human Centred-
Design (HCD) is a methodology that focuses on
the people that you serve and places them at
the center of design and implementation. HCD
combines research and insights with business
and technology requirements to produce the
best output. It is indeed more relevant for the life
sciences and healthcare sectors as the onus is
on producing effective drugs and care.
From the pharma industry perspective,
design thinking could be using design to come
up with ideas to effective connect with and offer
care to patient. A study conducted by the Drug
Information Association (DIA) in collaboration
with the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug
Development (CSDD) indicates more than 65
per cent of pharma and biotech companies are
inclined to invest in drug development through
patient centric initiatives. As the demand for
patient-centred drug development and service
continues to rise, a human centred approach
could be the differentiator for companies in the
Human-Centred Design
in Biopharma
Need of the hour
4. 2 Pharma Focus Asia ISSUE - 29 2017
Contents
Strategy
06 Future Prospects of Biotherapeutics
and Challenges
Ambikanandan Misra, Faculty of Pharmacy
The Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda
Clinical Trials
26 Patient Recruitment in Asia
Reducing the clinical burden
David Yoshii, Senior Director, Global Site Solutions
PAREXEL International
30 Low Rates of Stroke and Major
Bleeding with Rivaroxaban Confirmed
by Global Study
XANTUS pooled results study
John Battersby, Medical Writer, Bridges Publishing Pte Ltd
36 Wearables in Clinical Trials
Where we are & where we are going
Xavier Flinois, President, PAREXEL Informatics
Research &
Development
40 Merging Technology Transfer with
Knowledge Translation
Academic to industrial research
Vivek Dave, Sachdev Yadav, Harshavardhan ML Yadav
Isha Mehta
Department of Pharmacy, Banasthali University
48 Creating the Perfect Capsule
Choosing the right shell excipient for your
formulation challenges
Bjorn Vergauwen, Principal Scientist, Rousselot
Manufacturing
52 The Rise in Sterile Manufacturing
A focus on containment
Christian Dunne, Global Product Manager
ChargePoint Technology
Information
Technology
58 Take a Pass on the 3pm Samples
Steve Madden, Software Product Manager Mass Spectrometry
Agilent Technologies
62 Books
The Human-Centred
Biopharma Organisation
Andrew A Parsons, Reciprocal Minds Limited
Susan M Cruse, Leadership Mastery Limited
COVERSTORY 18
48
30
7. It takes a unique blend of expertise
to deliver the right results
From clinical development to commercial production
At Vetter, we look at your product from every angle. And help you
find answers that make a difference in efficiency, productivity, safety,
quality, and growth. From initial process design through high-speed
fill and finish, learn how a partnership with Vetter will keep your
product moving smoothly towards success.
More than 35 years of experience in aseptic filling
Expertise with many compound classes, including biologics
Highly trained experts in key technical areas
Integrated life cycle management
Innovative drug delivery options
State-of-the-art cGMP manufacturing
Excellent global regulatory support
Vetter
Development Service
Vetter
Commercial Manufacturing
Vetter
Packaging Solutions
US inquiries: infoUS@vetter-pharma.com • Asia Pacific inquiries: infoAsiaPacific@vetter-pharma.com •
Japan inquiries: infoJapan@vetter-pharma.com • EU and other international inquiries: info@vetter-pharma.com
Answers that work
www.vetter-pharma.com
8. 6 Pharma Focus Asia ISSUE - 29 2017
Advancements in the biotechnology have presented
pharmaceutical manufacturing industries biotherapeutics
which are promising as potential future therapeutics.
Diverse categories of biotherapeutics are coming
into the market which range from monoclonal
antibodies, growth hormones and cytokines
to vaccines. Present topic will cover the future
prospects and challenges to the biotherapeutics.
Ambikanandan Misra, Faculty of Pharmacy, The Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda
B
iotherapeutics or biological
products are generally produced
using living cells or organisms
(recombinant DNA technology,
controlled gene expression and antibody
technologies). It may be manufactured
using biotechnology derived from
natural sources or produced synthetically.
Recombinant hormones, vaccines,
monoclonal antibody based products,
growth factors, blood products and
advanced technology products (gene
and cell therapy biological products)
are few of the biotherapeutics.
According to definition of the PHS
(Public health service) act of USFDA,
biological products are defined as a virus,
therapeutic serum, toxin, antitoxin,
vaccine, blood, blood component or
derivative, allergenic product, protein
(except any chemically synthesised
polypeptide), or analogous product
which are applicable to the prevention,
treatment, or cure of a disease or
condition of human beings. Proteins
Future
Prospects of
Biotherapeutics
and Challenges
Strategy
9. 7w w w . p h a r m a f o c u s a s i a . c o m
Strategy
Gene screening & vector insertation
Host cell expression & cell culture
Protein production and purification
Formulation & Development and Analysis
Storage & handling
are classified as drugs as well as
biologics in USFDA but proteins
are regulated as a biological
product, except any chemically
synthesised polypeptide, under
the BPCI act.
Difference between
Biologics, Biosimilars and
Generics
The generic version of biolog-
ics are known as biosimilars in
Europe, Similar biologics in
India, follow-on Pharmaceutical
in USA and Japan, subsequent
entry biologics in Canada, and
biocomparables in Mexico. The
origin of the terminology lies
10. 8 Pharma Focus Asia ISSUE - 29 2017
Parameters Characterisation technique
Primary sequence (peptide map
andamino acid sequence
analysis), immunogenicity
(immunoassay) other identity
indicators
IE, HPLC, gel electrophoresis
Potency Cell-based bioassay, gene expression bioassay, ADCC, CDC
Conformation
Near/far UV circular dichroism spectroscopy, Fourier
transform infrared spectroscopy, X ray crystallography
and differential scanning calorimetry
Glycosylation
onosaccharide composition analysis, oligosaccharide
profile, CE, LC-MS, MS/MS, ESI, MALDI-TOF
Phosphorylation Peptide mapping with MS
Truncation
SE-HPLC, gel electrophoresis, AUC, peptide mapping with
MS, RP HPLC
Glycation
Peptide mapping with (MS, HPLC), methylation,
isomerisation (RP HPLC)
Pegylation HPLC, CE
Aggregation SE-HPLC, gel electrophoresis, Light scattering and AUC
Oxidation Peptide mapping with MS
Deamidation
Capillary IEF, peptide mapping with MS, and CEX-HPLC,
C-terminal lysine (capillary IEF, peptide mapping with
MS, and CEX-HPLC), misfolds (RP-HPLC)
Host cell proteins ELISA, DNA, endotoxin (Limulus amoebocyte lysate assay)
Binding Cell assays, spectroscopy, ELISA
Biological activity Cell assays, animal models
Abbreviations: IE, ion exchange; HPLC, high performance liquid
chromatography; ADCC, antibody-dependent cell-mediated
cytotoxicity; CDC, complement-dependent cytotoxicity; CE, capillary
electrophoresis; LC–MS, liquid chromatography–mass spectroscopy;
MS/MS, tandem mass spectrometry; ESI, electrospray ionisation;
MALDI-TOF, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time of flight
MS; AUC, analytical ultracentrifugation; CEX, cation exchange; IEF,
isoelectric focusing; SE, size exclusion; RP-HPLC, reverse phase
HPLC; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; QSE, quality
safety and efficacy.
in the loss of patent protection of first
generation innovator biologics in last
decades. Biologics are at least 1000 times
larger than conventional drugs or generic
drugs in size containing hundreds
of amino acids joined by peptide
bonds to form a polypeptide. It is very
difficult to establish reproducibility
for biosimilars whereas reproducibil-
ity can be easily achieved by generics
or small molecules conventional drugs.
Biologics, biosimilars and generics
are needed to exhibit comparabil-
ity, biosimilarity, and bioequivalence
respectively. The non-medical switch-
ing is not allowed in biologics and
biosimilars whereas it is allowed in
generics. Biopharmaceutical produc-
tions methods are more complex
than chemical production methods
so production cost automatically
goes higher than generic counter-
parts. Although the goals are same —
to treat the disease—biotherapeutics
and generics differ substantially in ways
that might affect innovation, safety,
costs, clinical adoption, patient access,
and pricing.
Manufacturing of Biotherapeutics
The stable Biotherapeutics consist
of Primary (amino acid sequence)
and Secondary structures (α-helix
and β-sheets) which are folded to
form 3D-Tertritary structures that is
converted into quaternary structure.
The biological activity can be attributed
to glycosylation and sialylation.
The characterisation remains the
challenge for biotherapeutics due to
larger size and structural complexity.
A typical biotherapeutics production
involves following steps:
The methods of biotherapeutics
characterisation are divided into quality,
safety and efficacy of product which
requires clearance by regulatory body
and further comparability exercise.
There is a significant improvement
in formulation of biotherapeutics and
characterisation of the products due to
recent guidelines on the International
Conference on Harmonisation Q8
Strategy
11. 9w w w . p h a r m a f o c u s a s i a . c o m
on pharmaceutical development and
the roll-out of the Quality by Design
and Process Analytical Technology,
comparability of biotechnological /
biological Products subject to changes
in their Manufacturing process Q5E and
quality of biotechnological products:
stability testing of biotechnological
/ biological products Q5C. There
are methods for characterisation of
biotherapeutics as mentioned in the
table.
Switching and Interchangeability in
Biosimilars
Reference product biologics and their
biosimilars are very important treatment
options for multiple diseases and have
the potential to expand the possibilities
for our patients. Switching studies
evaluate all the parameters change with
exposure to interchangeable product with
reference one. The main purpose of this
study is to demonstrate the risk in terms
of safety or diminished biological activity
between interchangeable molecules. As
per FDA a product is interchangeable
with biosimilars, if the manufacturer
proves that it is expected to produce
same clinical result in same patient
only is product considered as safe.
Comparability studies are performed
between a biosimilars and its reference
product, but studies between one
biosimilars and another are not done;
two separate biosimilars may have been
compared to the same reference but not
between themselves.
Challenges in Development of
Biosimilars
European Medicine Agency (EMEA)
has first issued guidelines defining
biosimilar approval pathway which
has been adopted and/modified by
several countries. Guidelines issued
by WHO are almost similar to EMEA
guidelines. However, similarities
in the guidelines is just the tip of
the iceberg, and there is an intense
need for streamlining the standards.
Furthermore, companies are suspending
the development of biosimilars at clinical
stages, hesitating to conduct single
and global development programmes
due to the changes in the IP rights,
evolving guidelines (many countries
are changing their guidelines abruptly
as the understanding and definitions
of biosimilarity, interchangeability,
substitution etc. evolve), unknown
patient-to-patient variability between
the biosimilar and reference biologic
in Phase I/II studies, large variability
encountered in PK/PD studies, safety,
efficacy and immunogenicity profiles due
to manufacturing quality, uncertainty
in Phase III trials (whether to consider
the Phase III trials as non-inferiority
trials or bioequivalence trials) etc. Many
countries require that the reference
biologic be approved /licensed/ marketed
in the country. So, it becomes very
difficult for the companies to target
other countries using same biosimilar,
as it would raise the questions due to
large number of quality comparisons
to be established, number of different
toxicology and clinical studies to be
performed. High development costs force
companies to focus first on developed
nations with large market size which will
delay/limit development of biosimilars
Strategy
2008
No guidelines•
on bio similar
in the U.S.
Debate on key•
issues
Pathway•
passed as
part of the
ACA
2010
2009
Implementation•
of the
Biologics Price
Competition and
Innovation Act
2012
Draft guidence•
issued from
U.S. FDA with
Clarity on•
biosimilar
approval
pathway
2014
Purple Book•
published
Sandoz and•
Celltrion field
biosimilar
candidate
applications for
regulatory
approval
97 biosimilars•
in development
2013
$42B•
Total
global
sale
Current trends in biosimilars
12. 10 Pharma Focus Asia ISSUE - 29 2017
Strategy
AuthorBIO
Ambikanandan Misra is Professor of Pharmacy at Faculty of
Pharmacy at The Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda. He has
been associated with the field of pharmaceutical sciences for more
than 38 years. 42 PhD and 128 Master students have completed
their dissertation under his guidance. He has 7 books, 40 book
chapters and 156 peer reviewed publications in reputed journals.
He has filed 29 national and international patents out of which 8
have been granted so far.
Source of RWD United States European States
Approval Procedure
Approval is based on
the information indicative
of the biological product is
highly similar along with no
meaningful discrepancy in
their safety, potency and /
or the purity to that of the
reference biological product
(1)
Approval is based on by
comparing the biosimilar
product with its reference
biological product
demonstrate that there
are no significant changes
between them (Applicable
clinical data necessary to
compare with the inventor)
(2)
Naming
Manufacturer and FDA
determines the naming of
biosimilar product (3)
Approving body of the
individual member states
determines to name of the
biosimilar product (3)
Labeling
A statement has to be written
on the product that it is
a biosimilar for specified
indication(s) as well as
administration route(s), and if
biosimilar is interchangeable
with reference biological
product (1)
A clear indication on all
the biosimilar products
with the black symbol and
standardised descriptive
statement (4)
Interchangeability
FDA determines the
interchangeability of the
biosimilar product to the
reference biologic based on
the optional evaluation (5)
EMA declines
interchangeability of the
biosimilar product to the
reference biologic (6)
Automatic Switching Executed by state laws (7)
Executed by individual
member states (6)
Pharmacovigilance
Endorsements
Regulation and the awareness
of the product specific post-
marketing safety monitoring by
FDA (1)
Product name and Batch
number are the identities of
all biologics (4)
Regulatory frameworks in biosimilars in EU & USA medicines. The cumulative market
potential may reach beyond EUR 100
billion in next five years. There are at
least 50 distinct biosimilars in pipeline
and will be delivered successfully
in next five years. Biosimilars can
bring improvements to patient
outcomes by providing more treatment
options to physicians and reducing the
need for rationing.
Conclusion
Though adopted and evolved from
similar background, a large amount
of discrepancies exists between
regulatory guidelines being followed
in different countries. There is
a mandate for harmonising the
guidelines at global level which will
ease the biosimilars product
manufacturing in several countries
enabling the companies to globally
market their biosimilar products.
There is a potential opportunity for
biopharmaceutical companies for
low-cost manufacturing in semi-
regulated and non-regulated markets.
Companies need to review and follow all
quality, safety, and efficacy parameters
of different countries and revising
the development plan for biosimilars
from time to time addressing the
country-by country differences. India
is gearing up with the companies
that are adopting guidelines more
in line with EU and USA. Soon,
more Indian companies will get
through the rigid approval framework
including refined requirements of
non-clinical and clinical evaluations;
India is going to make its stance as
a provider of low-cost biosimilar
products.
for countries with smaller markets.
All of this mandates that the biosimilar
guidelines evolve and be streamlined
as soon as possible. Until then, there
is no option other than to consider
the specified pathways of each
country. Streamlining will surely take
time; but once done, there will be
a step-wise approach for biosimilar
authorisation /marketing in several
countries. Thorough and defined quality
characterisation tests, non-clinical
studies, extent of clinical studies and
standards for reference biologics will be
specified which will help extrapolation
of data from one indication to
other approved indications of innovator
product. It will also resolve the
differences in nomenclature that may
cause multiple revisions of clinical trials
and marketing authorisation applications
for consistency with guidelines and
regulations.
The Potential of Biosimilars
A number of key biologics are going
off patent by 2020, thus there is a huge
potential for Biosimilar version of these
14. 12 Pharma Focus Asia ISSUE - 29 201712 Pharma Focus AsiA ISSUE - 29 2017
How Best to introduce
Medical Devices Class II
Products into the Chinese Market
How best to introduce medical devices class II products into the chinese market?
Many Pharma companies are still bothering from China regulations. Having
a partner who understands the opportunity and competitive environment of
the Chinese marketplace is absolutely essential and can be the difference
between success and failure. Phillips-Medisize explains the work to bring a rapid
development of a variable dose pen injector in China through regulatory approval.
Bill Welch, CTO, Phillips-Medisize
Finding the most appropriate foreign manufacturing
partners for Chinese companies in the medical devices
marketplace involves complex studies and background
research for suitable partnership candidate companies
into a number of key issues. Foreign drug companies
needtounderstandthismarket’schallengestocapitalize
on the opportunities and obvious long-term benefits for
both parties. By gaining an in-depth knowledge into
the country’s regulatory body, an organization can
leverage this experience to both advance its product
and to create a solid and sustainable foundation for an
expanding manufacturing strategy in China.
With a sales volume of $ 48.5 billion in 2015 China is
one of the world’s largest and fastest growing medical
device markets. This represented a Compound
15. 13w w w . p h a r m a f o c u s a s i a . c o m 13w w w . p h a r m a f o c u s a s i a . c o m
Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of some 22.3 percent
between 2010 and 2015. Today, China is the world’s
2nd largest medical device market with overall
healthcare expected to reach $ 1.3 trillion by the end
of 2018. This market is expected to continue to grow
strongly, with pharmaceutical expenditure expected
to increase at a rate of almost 70 percent over the next
five years.Finding the most appropriate reliable long-
term global partners is an essential part in securing
ongoing sustainable growth in that sector to satisfy
demand.
Currently, approx. 300 million Chinese patients are
suffering from chronic diseases alone; this number is
boundtoriseovertime.Suchdiseasesincludediabetes
and many other conditions requiring treatment with
medical devices for diagnostics and drug delivery.
And this is just the home market – not taking product
exports into consideration.
Only the most advances high-tech organizations
with a global presence producing innovative medical
devices can offer the multi-faceted requirements in
such a complex market place. The principal criteria
include:
1. Speed of innovation , passage time to market –
critical assets assessment to reach market viability
2. From Part to Market
3. Product Approval and Registration–knowledge and
experience in and speedy execution of
As a contract manufacturing organization (CMO)
and a contract development and manufacturing
organization (CDMO), Phillips-Medisize is one such
forward-lookingcompanysatisfyingthecriticalfactors
relevant for the vast Chinese markets in the Medical
Devices Class II sector. More than just a molder, the
company specializes in design through distribution
services and has created an environment focused
on high quality and adherence to rigorous time-to-
market schedules. Furthermore, the company has
had a design manufacturing center near Shanghai
for the past three years. A newly added medical
devices registration operation has been given to
the medical device production facility that has Good
Manufacturing Practice (GMP) from the China Food
and Drug Administration (CFDA). This means that
the paths – innovation and part to market – have
already been cleared to a great extent.
Phillips-Medisize already has in-depth insight into the
many regulations, guidelines, protocols, procedures
and codes of practice for Medical Devices Class II
products and their timely implementations are the
cornerstone of a long-lasting productive partnership.
Last, but not least, the ability to recognize the unique
market trends within China are part of the company’s
strength. This gives this organization a vitally important
competitive edge. In addition, familiarity with product
testing and the final product registration are an
important part of what Phillips-Medisize can offer
potential partners in China.
When it comes to Medical Devices Class II products,
the Phillips-Medisize variable auto-dose pen injector,
insulin pen, is a prime example of the classification.
1. Speed of Innovation
The time between initial concept of the product or
product development must be kept to an absolute
minimum and without compromising fundamental
part of the process. Here, the knowledge of all vital
segments of state-of-the-art technology is, at the very
best, a routine part of any appropriate company’s
remit. Suitable partners must possess the critical
assets essential to satisfy Chinese manufacturers.
Commercial viability and market maturity are familiar
phrases to any suitable candidate. Criteria include
global presence, in-depth market knowledge in the
guest country, fully trained design, development
and implementation personnel able to work with its
customers to deliver advanced automated assembly
and quality control technologies on a long-term
basis, which reduce manufacturing cost while, in
tandem, improve quality.
2. From Part to Market
Serving such a large, fast growing market such as
China, and allowing for potentially prolonged approval
times requires that device producers keep the
time to market readiness for new products to an
absolute minimum without compromising the
process.
Advertorial
16. 14 Pharma Focus Asia ISSUE - 29 201714 Pharma Focus AsiA ISSUE - 29 2017
Insteadofaconventional‘linear’productdevelopment
life cycle with manufacturing development and
manufacturing stages after a large part of the
product development phases has been completed,
Phillips-Medisize has considerably shortened
lead times to market by bringing forward two
manufacturing stages to start and run parallel with
the product proof of concept stage of development.
Thus the concept development stage has become
a concept and manufacturing development stage
and the validation stage includes both product
development and manufacturing elements.
By adopting a systems engineering approach at an
early proof-of-concept stage, the company also aims
at reducing financial and other risks in efficient device
development to meet more advanced technical
requirements, as well as ensuring that required
devices reach the market within agreed schedules.
This is achieved by paying particular attention to
each individual component contained within the
drug delivery systems, as well as to the method by
which the components, sub-systems and complete
systems are fully integrated and work effectively
with each other. The systems engineering
approach is more robust than with linear product
development, as it requires some engineers
dedicated to systems and others to sub-systems
development.
For example, Phillips-Medisize states that although
this involves higher up-front early development stage
costs than with linear product development, it saves
other expenses later on, e.g. if the need arises to trace
back the cause for a device not properly functioning
at a later stage in development or marketing.
The potential higher up-front development costs are
minimized by integrating Design for Manufacture
(DFM) and Design for Assembly (DFA), as 80
percent of product cost and quality are often
determined during the first 20 percent of the product
development cycle. Manufacturing strategy must be
fully aligned with device strategy in order to avoid end
stage changes which may compromise stakeholder
requirements or program feasibility.
3. Product Approval and Registration
Bill Welch, Chief Technology Officer at
Phillips-Medisize, explains the registration and
approval process:
Any serious contender, contract development and
manufacturing organizations (CDMO), keen to enter
the Chinese medical devices market, must be totally
familiar with the time-consuming regulatory approval
procedure. Again, taking the insulin pen as an
example, the initial step to be taken is the appointment
and retention of a qualified agent based in China who
will coordinate registration with the CFDA, also known
as the State Food and Drug Administration (SFDA) or
simply State Drug Administration (SDA).
17. 15w w w . p h a r m a f o c u s a s i a . c o m 15w w w . p h a r m a f o c u s a s i a . c o m
This approach applies in a formal review process for
the single device, the device and the drugs it delivers
or in parallel reviews for the device and drug. Products
should be treated both as the sum of the constituent
drug and delivery device parts, but also as a complete
treatment system. All the different routes along the
registration and approval path influence the time to
market speed. They are equivalent to speed control
bumps along a motorway impeding rapid progress to
a successful conclusion.
Documents submitted in approval applications should
include not only data on product performance, but
also on, for example, risk analysis and technical
requirements, animal trials, biocompatibility, bio
safety, drug expiry and package as well as software
aspects.
The review process takes into account whether the
device is produced in China, requiring a Device
Manufacturing Permit (DMP), or imported from
abroad, either in part or as a whole. Domestic
Chinese and international approval status is taken
into account, as well as whether production takes
place as a certified GMP process and, in the case of
a drug, whether it already has an import license.
Authorization is granted if already approved in the
producer’s home country. It is less complex to
introduce new products into the Chinese market if
they are produced in China, specifically or mainly for
the Chinese market. Failing that, products should,
at least, be either clinically trialed in their country of
origin or supported by data showing that a medical
device is ‘substantially equivalent’ to those already
produced in and, therefore, approved in China.
The local agent submits the device at a medical
device evaluation center for approved by the CFDA
and at provincial FDA locations, as both these bodies
are responsible for regulations and guidance. They
may well request additional clinical trials if new first
of its-kind devices are submitted.
Producers should have a well-developed clinical
strategy and have backing of, for instance, risk-
benefit analyses by an ethics committee in the EU
or an equivalent Institutional Review Board (IRB) in
the USA, which formally approves, monitors and
reviews biomedical and research involving humans.
The registration partner can encounter challenges
during the approval process, such as substantial
regulatory changes or newly introduced registration
and certification requirements. It is therefore diligent
to conduct gap analysis, to compare actual and
desired performance, as a basis for timely corrective
action.
Information should be submitted in an easily
understandable form and available in the appropriate
local Chinese language at all levels. CFDA nationally
and FDA at both provincial and city levels are involved
with quality system inspection and post-market
surveillance, the FDA city level for manufacturing site
licensing.
The entire process can be challenging as FDA officials
are known to be inundated with drug and delivery
device applications over past years. The CFDA
receives over 10,000 new drug applications each
year, but is limited by its review capacity of 5,000 to
6,000 pa. This has resulted in a backlog, estimated
currently at around 21,000 submissions. The result
is that foreign companies face potentially longer
waiting times for approval than Chinese companies.
In addition, approval times for new products can take
longer than renewal approvals for existing products,
some 20 percent or so longer for Class III devices and
between 15-25 percent for new drugs and biologics
(genetically-modified proteins derived from living
entities).
Advertorial
Longer and more costly registration times may also
be expected due to medical device classification in
China according to CFDA’s SDA Order Number 15
differing significantly from EU and US classifications.
For example, a Class II device in the USA or a Class
IIa/IIb device in the EU could be considered Class III
in China.
18. 16 Pharma Focus Asia ISSUE - 29 201716 Pharma Focus AsiA ISSUE - 29 2017
FDA offices are not only suffering from staff shortages
thus increasing work load for officials, they are also
required to cope with the decentralized regulatory
structure, absence of a common IT infrastructure and
a lack of consistent policies which hinder effective
communication between the various FDA offices.
There is also limited ability to track national and
global databases for adverse events, unlike tracking
procedures that have become well established in the
EU and North America.
Apart from CFDA and FDA offices, establishment
of contacts and a local interface with the Centre for
Medical Device Evaluation (CMDE), the Centre for
Drug Evaluation (CDE) and the General Administration
of Quality Supervision, Inspection, and Quarantine
(AQSIQ) are also advisable.
This pressure on the regulatory and approval system
is a development mainly as a result of the size and
speed of growth of the Chinese healthcare market.
Variable Dosing Prospects
Medical device research consultancy Quality Invention
(QI LLC) was involved with Phillips-Medisize in the
insulin pen development. According to them, the
consultancy’sprimegoalisthedesignanddevelopment
of medical devices to address combination product
challenges in the pharma industry.
The consultancy is headed by Dr Min Wei, a registered
patent agent, who not only holds a PhD in Material
Science, but also MSc qualifications in Polymer and
Computer Sciences, supplemented by a Master’s
degree in Business Administration (MBA). Unlike
variable-dose auto-injectors, Wei points out that
fixed-dose auto-injectors do not address individual
personalized medication needs for multiple doses, fail
to meet different dosing needs of adults and children,
present challenges to registration and compliance as
combination products (combination of the drug and
its delivery device), and are expensive if integrated
into adaptive clinical trials. More usability data can
be collected in clinical trials with variable-dose
auto-injectors and they have greater dosing accuracy
than conventional vial and syringe dosing.
He states that variable-dose auto-injectors can be
easily adopted for use with medicines that are already
available in graduated pre-filled syringes, from e.g.
Amgen, Genetech, Novartis and Sanofi, enabling a
smooth transition into variable dosing for both patients
and their doctors and other medical staff.
According to Wei, the medicines so far available in this
form and already administered in millions of units per
year are Epoetin alfa (Epogen), Filgrastim (Neupogen),
Enoxaparin sodium (Lovenox) and Methotrexate.
But Relistor, Sumatriptan succinate, Invega, Stelara,
Procrit and Humira are additional medicines calling
19. 17w w w . p h a r m a f o c u s a s i a . c o m 17w w w . p h a r m a f o c u s a s i a . c o m
A u t h o r BIO
Bill Welch has over 25 years of contract design, development
and manufacturing experience, primarily serving customers in
the drug delivery, health technology and diagnostics markets. In
his current capacity as Chief Technical Officer at Phillips-Medisize,
he leads a global, over-600 person development, engineering,
tooling, programme management and validation organisation.
Bill has been with Phillips-Medisize since 2002.
for variable dosing and which could also be efficiently
dosed by a variable does injector. Wei adds that many
more are in the pipeline.
Due to greater fear of injections than adults, children
(pediatric patients) have the greatest need for variable
dosing, the quantity being determined by body weight
or surface area.
Bill Welch is of the opinion that there is evidence that
adaptiveclinical trials (CTs), those where multiple
formulations can be evaluated and where there is a
prospect of modification later on in the trial. They are
gaining in popularity, as they shorten study duration
andreducecosts,improvechancesofsuccess,andare
ethically superior. Most importantly, Welch maintains
that variable-dose auto-injectors provide the flexibility
to run adaptive CTs without design modifications or in
excessive production quantities.
He illustrates this with an example where a CT with a
variable-dose auto-injector can reduce drug quantity
needed by a factor of seven, compared to running
the CT with fixed dosing, resulting in estimated cost
savings of $12 million, based on seven doses per
week over 52 weeks, with 400 patients, and assuming
a $100 preparation cost for each CT drug unit. He
refers to data in a report by K. Spenceret and others in
the Journal of Diabetes Science & Technology; issue
6:1296, 2012.
Typical Auto-Injector Design
A typical variable-dose auto-injector is a graduated
pre-filled syringe, which can be seen by the user via a
viewing window in the pen housing. The user rotates
a dialing cap on the top of the pen, so that it moves
along a dosing scale marked on the pen body for the
correct dose required.
The user then removes the bottom cap and needle
shield, removing the dialing cap to expose the
actuation button, before placing the bottom of the
injector against the area to be injected. Pressing the
actuation button then triggers auto-injection. When
the pen is removed from the injected area the user is
required to replace the needle shield, or sharps cover,
for safety reasons.
Welch points out that such pens can be designed as
a platform that enables 1mL long or 2.25mL variable-
dose auto-injectors to be easily transformed into fixed-
dose disposable and fixed-dose reusable versions
without complete redesign, as the housing and many
other components are identical across the entire
platform, also when, for instance, a fixed-dose auto-
injector is supplied with a connectivity function. This
means that different types of auto-injectors can be
produced on one assembly line.
By gaining in-depth knowledge of the country’s
regulatory procedures, an organization can leverage
this experience to both advance its product and to
create a stable foundation for a global expansion
strategy in China and beyond. This means that proven
success in China serves as a valuable marketing tool
and the experience and knowledge can be invaluable
for medical device manufacturers when entering other
countries across the globe.
The Chinese medical device market was recently
valued at $27.7 billion and is projected to grow to
an estimated $50.8 billion in 2020. Given the growth
in medical device sales and the predicted rise in
population in China at a rapid pace, this is undoubtedly
a market that medical device companies are keen to
enter in order to take advantage of the obvious and
exciting opportunities.
Advertorial
20. 18 Pharma Focus Asia ISSUE - 29 2017
The biopharmaceutical industry is in
continual change. Increased competition
and diversity in business models creates a
leadership challenge of sustaining growth
and performance. To address this challenge,
we outline a focus on Human Centred
Organisations, with Leaders creating
meaningful and engaged work environments
to maximise performance sustainably.
Andrew A Parsons, Reciprocal Minds Limited
Susan M Cruse, Leadership Mastery Limited
COVERSTORY
Strategy
The
Human-Centred
Biopharma
Organisation
21. 19w w w . p h a r m a f o c u s a s i a . c o m
Strategy
T
o maximise performance, it is time to put the human
in the centre of the complex, multicultural and
dispersed ecosystem of biopharma innovation.
The Challenge of Sustainable Growth - The Current
Scenario
The pharmaceutical industry has changed dramatically
over the past 10 years. Despite a range of merger and
acquisitions within large companies, the industry has
grown in the number of companies selling products
within the market. Comparing 2003 to 2015, the global
industry has grown 41per cent in terms of revenue,
53 per cent in terms of R&D spend with a 100 per
cent increase in clinical projects. Organisationally, the
dispersed nature of the sector supports increased number
of deals resulting in merger and acquisitions or IPO. The
industry is therefore becoming increasingly fragmented
and competitive in terms of revenue and organisational
autonomy.
Against this backdrop of increased fragmentation, it
is apparent that successful projects and products remain
elusive. The cost of development and easy access to
medicines is a persistent issue that regulatory agencies
and industry professionals are increasingly aware. There is
an inherent tension within the system between the high
levels of failure, the costs involved in development and
commercialisation and the needs of public and private
healthcare providers.
Big Pharma has consequently adapted its strategy
with wider global networks of research and development
across hubs and a focus on the emerging markets. The
22. 20 Pharma Focus Asia ISSUE - 29 2017
dispersed and global nature of the
business has resulted in reductions
within the knowledge base of discrete
organisations and a drive to collaborate
and gain expertise and know how from
collaborators. A recent academic review
highlighted key areas of collaboration
including sharing and learning at
organisational and team levels, and
access to infrastructure and management
expertise with appropriate governance
control points of projects. These macro
level changes in the pharma sector are
evidence of some dramatic changes in
operational business models. The days
of large fully integrated pharmaceutical
companies with depth and breadth of
R&D projects and finances appear
long gone. No doubt the model will
continue to develop further over the
next 10 years.
The Leadership Challenge
At a more specific or micro level of
leaders and managers within individual
companies, these macro level changes
create some difficult challenges. Some
key issues include how to create impact
in decision making when you may work
virtually or remotely? How to ensure
effective and efficient communications
across cultural boundaries and how to
create engaged and productive teams
and collaborations?
There are no simple answers to these
questions. We often focus on how to
better use technologies and information.
However, there are other approaches
commonly used to ensure the most
productive interface between people
and what they do. In this article, we
aim to raise awareness of human factor
approaches and outline some pull and
push approaches to ensure people can
operate at their best, especially in the
fast paced, multicultural, and global
biopharma industry of today.
What are Human Factors?
Human factors encompass a professional
science often known as ergonomics.
It relates to the understanding of
interactions among humans and other
elements of a system. Human factors
research has been applied across high-
hazard sectors to develop safe practices
that not only anticipate, but also
mitigate, human error. Within the U.K.
NHS, the importance of human factors
has been highlighted and identified as
an avenue for collaboration between
disciplines providing key benefits in
the utilisation of people, their needs
and containing costs.
Human-Centred Organisations
In 2016, some guiding principles were
developed by the International Standards
Organisation (ISO) for developing
human centred organisations. Part
of the rationale for developing this
standard was the recognition that human
well-being is an important measure to
complement the traditional measures
of output. The standard, ISO 27500,
is not an operational standard but
highlights the principles, values, and
beliefs that make organisations human
centred. The standard draws on a wealth
of ergonomic and human factor design
principles that are known to be successful
across a range of organisational structures
from large to small private or public
organisations. Seven principles were
identified that characterise a human-
centred organisation that encompass
individual perspectives, usability of
products and systems, and social
responsibility that includes being
trustworthy. Through efforts based on
a systems approach encompassing human
factors these principles are known to
make significant contributions to overall
productivity.
Engaging a Diverse Multi-National,
and Multi-Cultural Workforce
We suggest at least two of these
principles have high relevance to the
complex, multidimensional, and fast-
paced world of the biopharmaceutical
sector that operates across multiple
organisational and cultural boundaries.
Attention to the principles of ensuring
individual differences is an organisational
strength and valuing employees to create
a meaningful work environment will
have positive impact in a multicultural
environment.
Create a Meaningful Work
Environment that Values Employees
– the Engaged Workforce
It is important to remember that people
deliver on organisational objectives
Strategy
Comparing 2003 to 2015,
the global industry has
grown 41per cent in terms
of revenue, 53 per cent in
terms of R&D spend with
a 100 per cent increase in
clinical projects.
23. 21w w w . p h a r m a f o c u s a s i a . c o m
and utilise their skills and capabilities
to adapt to a variety of situations.
Not surprisingly, therefore, there is
evidence that indicators of worker
wellbeing are linked to performance.
Meaningful work supports not only
our wellbeing but also our engagement
and absorption into the work that we
do. These are essential ingredients for
releasing the creativity of research and
development scientists to bring new
products into the market. Innovation
in both developing new products and
processes requires individuals who are
engaged and confident within their roles.
Innovation is hampered by stress and
distraction, particularly by the distraction
of leadership when it is inconsistent,
irresponsible, excluding, silent, and by
the distraction of conflict or lack of
connection and understanding between
individuals. It is supported by tuning
into the bigger picture the benefits
to those who use our products; in
other words, each seeing the value
of their contribution and how their
work makes a difference. Within the
healthcare industry, our ultimate
endgame is to improve human health
through whatever aspect our work
may involve. However, it is perhaps
too simplistic to assume these links
drive a meaningful work place. For
front-line medical Staff there is a risk
of compassion fatigue and burnout often
related to workplace stress.
A human-centred approach would
suggest that the balance needs to be
struck between financial rewards
and the meaning the work brings to
the individual in terms of their own
sense of being and what matters most
to them. Creating the right blend
of performance measures that are
linked to the ultimate patient value will
provide transparency in decision
making.
Organisations make work meaningful
by:
Identifying the meaning•
Expressing the meaning•
Living by the meaning (all efforts •
aligned to it)
Repeating it often•
Strategy
Disengaged Engaged
Productivity
Leader
Leadership
Effectiveness
Team
Team Effectiveness
The Lens of
Culture
The Lens of
Culture
The Lens of
Culture
Figure 1 The impact of engagement and dis-engagement on Leader and Team Behaviour. Awareness of multicultural dimensions is key
24. 22 Pharma Focus Asia ISSUE - 29 2017
Strategy
Human factors also indicate that
people work best when they are valued
and feel included in the workplace.
This has an important aspect in the
biopharmaceutical world of the 21st
Century. With so many enterprises
working across wide cultural and
organisational boundaries, the industry
is one of collaboration and partnerships.
To get the best from these collaborative
networks, the individuals need to feel
valued, that they have a voice and are
invited to use it, and that they contribute
to meaningful goals. Failure to satisfy
these basic human factors creates a
risk that the performance of the teams
becomes transactional, adhering to the
status quo and focussed on intermediate
goals.
Figure1 outlines the influence of
engagement and disengagement of
leaders and their staff on their own and
their team’s performance. Supportive
leaders develop human centred and
holistic approaches that significantly
modify team behaviours.
Measures of Engagement
The difficult aspect of working with
people across the multidimensional
matrices involved in biopharmaceuti-
cal innovation include how to meas-
ure the engagement of individuals,
and how their experience of work
relates to how they feel. A variety of
methods are present to measure work
engagement, and are all self-reported
measures. Engagement is an experi-
ential state, an experience that is very
personal to the individual involved
and covers many aspects of thoughts,
feelings and autonomy. Individuals are
engaged when they experience their
work as being part of something with
colleagues they trust. The converse of
engagement relates to high levels of
work place stress and an absence of
absorption in work. Dis-engagement
can limit performance of leaders and
impact their teams.
Leaders need to be trusted and
engender trust between their colleagues.
Much research has been undertaken in
this area but some early work provides
some simple rules that openness /
congruity in actions of leaders, having
shared values and understanding the
limits of decision making with feedback
provide a guide that appears relevant to
the complex multi-organisational and
cultural biopharma ecosystem.
Individual Differences are an
Organisational Strength
A recommended Human-Centred
principle is to see individual differences
as an organisational strength. There are
no ‘standard persons’. An ergonomic
approach takes into consideration the
whole, allowing multiple viewpoints
and create environments that support a
range of body types and social networks.
25. 23w w w . p h a r m a f o c u s a s i a . c o m
WE CARE & CONNECT YOUR PHARMA
26. 24 Pharma Focus Asia ISSUE - 29 2017
AuthorBIO
Andrew A Parsons PhD has worked in Biopharma in a variety
of Senior Executive and Non-Executive Roles. Initially trained in
Pharmacology and Neuroscience he worked in External Innovation
to maximise performance across organisational and cultural
boundaries. He is an accredited coach and has interests in systems
design.
Sue Cruse has extensive experience as a leader and as a coach,
working at senior levels across a range of sectors and organisations.
She has led building energy, resilience and resourcefulness, across
an employee population, to support sustainable high performance.
An accredited Executive Coach with an MSc in Behavioural Change.
This is perhaps even more important in
the multi-cultural and global nature of
business today.
Push and Pull Approaches to
Ensure Human-Centred Leadership
Many industries have embraced ergo-
nomic approaches to ensure critical
performance. This is especially so in the
case of high hazard industries such as the
nuclear and aviation industries. Within
these areas, a focus on safety is also a key
property of the sector. Perhaps it is time
to learn from professional ergonomists
/ human factor professionals in creating
systems that enable performance across
the complexity of the biopharma indus-
try? As the industry continues to frag-
ment and disperse, the tacit knowledge
that resides in the experience of skilled
professionals is likely to be lost.
Drug discovery is a socio-technical
enterprise that crosses the boundaries of
hard experimental data and a huge range
of uncertainties regarding prediction of
ultimate clinical safety and efficacy and
value. This system has some similari-
ties with other high technology indus-
tries that span the divide between hard
empirical observations and the human
perspective. A recent development in
engineering systems to allow appropriate
control of safety aspects in these socio-
technical enterprises has been proposed.
Approaches such as these may well
provide the appropriate risk manage-
ment infrastructure—the pull—to ensure
appropriate performance.
In this context, we suggest push
approaches are based on building
individual skills and an infrastructure
to create feedback and learning.
Challenges of mental health issues
related to work place stress are
becoming apparent in many cultures.
Whereas a engaged workplace facilitates
performance, prolonged periods of
stress can have significant negative
effects. Salutogeneis is a concept devel-
oped by Aaron Antonovsky that focuses
on an individual’s ability and resources
to promote health rather than on treat-
ment or managing risks. This approach
is widely used in public health and seems
appropriate in the workplace setting.
The key elements of a salutogenic
approach are the ability to develop and
utilise general resources of wellbeing
and maintain a problem solving orienta-
tion through a sense of coherence and
meaning. Developing general resources
across a multicultural workforce requires
a focus on the individual. Building on
psychosocial approaches provides an
individual framework to work cohesively
within the community. Several areas
of individual skill modelling are appro-
priate within the salutogenic approach
to build engagement and include the
five factors of wellbeing, building
mindfulness skills and being in flow are
part of being actively and attentive.
A recent model also highlights indi-
vidual skills to enable presence with
self and others as a leader.
Push programmes to enable engage-
ment across multicultural boundaries
should focus on the following areas to
maximise value to the individual and
organisation
Mindfulness/paying attention•
Managing emotions•
Building self-awareness of values,•
beliefs, and meaning
Solution focus•
Conclusions
A focus on how people interact with
their work is an established scientific
discipline that has been widely used
in other safety-critical industries. The
international standards organisation
has developed a series of principles to
support orientation of work activities
at a board level to ensure that companies
develop appropriate working practices
to maximise their performance.
We suggest that in the fast paced,
multicultural, and dispersed biopharma
industry today these principles are critical
to the success of the socio-technical
endeavour of Pharmaceutical R&D.
All these principles are important
and we suggest an initial starting
point would be to focus on the level
of employee engagement across
the system to ensure adherence to
principles relating to diversity and
meaning in the workplace.
The opportunities presented in the
biopharmaceutical business sector can
provide significant value to everyone
involved — from investors to customers.
Adopting a push and pull approach
to what is done is essential to
maximise performance. A human-
Centred experiential learning process
to develop leaders, managers,
and employees is also an essential
prerequisite for success. Paying attention
to the ‘human’ will enable solutions
to be developed for the essential
leadership challenges mentioned
above.
References are available at
www.pharmafocusasia.com
Strategy
27. MEDIA PARTNERS
AN INITIATIVE BY
SUPPORTED BY
For more information or to register, contact us at
+971 4 361 9616 info@pharmamanufacturingmena.com or visit www.pharmamanufacturingmena.com
• Meet with key local, regional, and international pharmaceuticals manufacturers
• Learn about the latest technologies used in pharma manufacturing
• Hear from leaders and key decision makers about strategic visions and initiatives for the industry
• Understand the level of collaboration between the different stakeholders to advance the
pharma market in the region
• Gain insights about the latest global technical and operational trends
• Network with your peers from the industry
• Get CME credits and boost your career
Key Benefits of Attending
Some Key Speakers
Exclusive 10% Discount for PharmaFocusAsia subscribers.
Please use the code MPM17PFA to avail the discount.
Bahaa Aboud,
National Operation Manager,
Tamer Group, KSA
Dr. Bassam M. Alwon,
Director, Establishments Inspection
Department, Drug Sector,
Saudi Food & Drug Authority
SFDA, KSA
Faisal Dail,
General Manager,
AJA Pharmaceutical IndustriesCo.
KSA
Mohamed Al Rifai,
Quality Operations Senior Manager,
Pfizer, KSA
Salah Alkowaiter,
Director of Quality and Compliance,
SPIMACO, KSA
Suleiman Aldajeh,
Head of Research & Development,
SAJA Pharmaceuticals,
KSA
Andrew East,
Production and Engineering Director,
ARABIO, KSA
Wasif Azeem,
Director Quality Operations,
Jamjoom Pharma
28. 26 Pharma Focus Asia ISSUE - 29 2017
Innovations in patient
recruitment coupled
with thoughtful local
implementation are a step
forward in our relentless
pursuit to simplify the
patient journey.
David Yoshii, Senior Director
Global Site Solutions
PAREXEL International
Patient
Recruitment
in Asia
Reducing the
clinical burden
Clinical TriAls
29. 27w w w . p h a r m a f o c u s a s i a . c o m
Clinical TriAls
T
oday, there are many innovative,
new approaches to patient
recruitment and the number
continues to grow. The driver behind
these innovations is the challenge that
many western countries face in recruiting
patients for participation in clinical
studies.
The concept of patient recruitment
is quite simple. It involves recruiting
the right patients, at the right time,
and in the right numbers. However, we
encounter hurdles in applying a ‘one size
fits all’ approach for these innovations,
and to ensure successful enrolment, the
recruitment tactics should consider local
needs and challenges.
number of clinical sites is expected to
rapidly increase within the next few
years. For the coming wave of new
sites in China, strong partnerships/
collaborations with investigators and
sites that enable them to deliver will
be a key factor for success.
In Japan, the challenges are different,
and more similar to western countries.
There is more competition for a
limited patient pool and the population
is shrinking. Frustration with the
limitations to the current approaches
is creating a market that is more
and more open to new ideas. Data-
driven feasibility is just beginning
to gain acceptance and patient-
centric approaches are also attracting
attention.
Such an environment requires
innovative approaches and strategies,
which are tailored to these markets.
Keys to Innovation
Innovations can come in the form of
products and process improvements.
Global innovation coupled with
thoughtful local implementation is
essential to succeed. To accomplish this,
one needs to hire and develop the right
talent, and work with the right partners,
to foster innovations, develop them, and
subsequently implement them in the
best possible way.
Local implementation of patient
recruitment innovation requires
knowledge of not only the challenges,
but also the needs of the specific
markets.
Proof Point: National Cancer Centre
Singapore (NCCS)
In 2016, BMC Women’s Health
published a study1
titled “Barriers and
facilitators for clinical trial participation
among diverse Asian patients with breast
cancer: a qualitative study.” The study
was conducted in the NCCS, which
treats 75 per cent of cancer patients in
Singapore and has a yearly outpatient
1 https://bmcwomenshealth.biomedcentral.com/
articles/10.1186/s12905-016-0319-1
Challenges for Different
Geographies
In Asia, there are challenges unique to
the region for clinical trial recruitment,
compared to the western world.
For example, in China with a
population of 1.4 billion people, the
shortage is not in patients, but in
site staff capable and experienced at
delivering quality clinical trial results.
On October 8 this year, the China Food
and Drug Agency (CFDA) announced
a new site certification process. Hospitals
are now able to self-register as a
clinical trial site, with the responsibility
for qualifying such sites lying with
the study sponsors. As a result, the
30. 28 Pharma Focus Asia ISSUE - 29 2017
attendance of more than 130,000.
In this study, various focus groups
studied females over the age of 21
with breast cancer, who were able to
provide informed consent and attend the
focus group by themselves. The study
examined the factors that influence
patient recruitment into clinical trials
in Asia, each factor showcasing an area
of clinical trial recruitment with the
potential to lessen the patient burden
and improve the overall experience.
These were found to include:
1. Knowledge and Attitude: Several
patients in the study said they had not
heard of the term “clinical trial,” and
many that had heard of the term were
previously or currently enrolled in
one. This lack of familiarity would be
a potential hurdle for recruiters, because
patients would be less likely to seek out
clinical trials if they had no concept of
their existence. However, it turned out
that 80 per cent of the participants asked
for more information about clinical
trials, showing that there is a desire for
information, but inadequate means to
obtain it.
2. Reasons to Join: This study
highlighted the individual, medical and
societal factors affecting the patient’s
decision to participate in clinical trials.
One deciding factor for some of the
women in the study was how the study
was introduced to them. The women
preferred and were more trusting of
studies that were introduced to them
by their doctors–highlighting the
need for clinical trials to work with
local institutions and within the local
Asian community to target potential
patients.
3. Relaying the Information: Another
important take away from the study
is that many participants said simpler
language and visual aids, such as
recordings and pictures should be used
to relay the ICFs (Informed Consent
Forms) and other information regarding
clinical trials – including promotion of
other clinical trials. Recruiters need to
simplify the information and tailor it
to audiences to make it easier for the
patient to understand.
Clinical TriAls
31. 29w w w . p h a r m a f o c u s a s i a . c o m
AuthorBIO
DavidYoshiiistheSeniorDirectorforGlobalSiteSolutions,covering
feasibility, patient recruitment, site alliances, and other site related
strategies for clients at PAREXEL International. His career spans over
20 years in drug development in various global leadership roles. He
joined PAREXEL in 2011.
Needs of Specific Markets: Getting
the Word Out
The study conducted by BMC Women’s
Health shows there is an opportunity
to improve how we approach clinical
trials. The industry is rapidly embracing
patient centric methodologies, as a means
to improve the patient experience, with
the potential to improve recruitment
rates, increase compliance with study
procedures and reduce withdrawals.
Increasingly technologies such as
“web listening” are being employed to
more accurately analyse the sentiment
of patients and caregivers, as well as
identify key influencers related to
a specific indication. For Asia, this
requires adapting technology for local
languages, as well as differences in social
media preferences. This approach allows
companies to fine tune their approaches
to provide valuable information about
the disease, therapies, as well as the
availability of clinical trials.
Needs of Specific Markets: The
Clinical Site
Investigator sites are critical to the success
of any clinical trial. PAREXEL alone has
value-driven partnerships with hundreds
of clinical sites across the world, of
which one in four sites are located in
Asia, to support drug development for
our clients’ investigational medicinal
products. These sites, located in
Japan, China, Korea, Taiwan, and in
key countries throughout the rest of
Asia, provide a means for patients to not
only access innovative, new therapies,
but have an improved clinical trial
experience. Creating these partnerships
in Asia is especially important for
trial participation and diversity, as
shown by the FDA in the 2015-2016
Global Participation in Clinical Trials
Report where the majority of Asian trial
participants in global studies were at
non-US sites.
Identifying the right sites isn’t easy.
Data-driven feasibility is an approach to
support site selection. Unfortunately, it
is highly dependent on the robustness
of the data being employed. For some
countries, historical data is sometimes
scarce, depending on the indication or
drug’s mechanism of action. This entails
augmentation, which requires tailoring
the approach to what is optimal in the
specific country. In Japan and China,
collaborating with Site Management
Organisations (SMOs) that provide
study nurse dispatch services to clinical
sites has proven effective, in addition to
other country-specific approaches.
Needs of Specific Markets: Relaying
the Information
Patient recruitment doesn’t end with
identifying the patient, but requires
the patient to consent to participate
in the clinical trial. For the patient to
give consent, they must first have a
comprehensive understanding of the
study. Some tools on the market try to
make this information easily digestible
with the use of animation to provide the
patient with an overview of the study
and related information – these tools are
being actively used in China, Taiwan,
Korea, and Japan. Such tools are often
tailored culturally with voice overs in
the local language and with animation
that not only appeals to young children,
but also adults and elderly patients, due
to the ease of comprehension. There
have already been increased trial consent
rates, improved compliance /retention
and shortened recruitment timelines in
the studies where these tools have been
implemented. An important factor is
ensuring that the animation is culture
agnostic and therefore acceptable in
these very particular markets, and
the simplicity of implementation is
important to meet the needs of highly
variable site environments.
Reflections
Approaches for patient recruitment must
have one thing in common: they must
make things simpler for the patient.
Participating in a clinical trial is filled
with anxiety and uncertainties, especially
coupled with existing challenges from
the underlying disease. Reducing the
anxiety and clinical trial burden are
obvious steps to make things simpler
for the patient.
The industry has decades and
decades of experience in running
clinical trials. However, as treatments
continue to evolve, there is a need to
advance the way we run the clinical
trials, to not only provide evidence
of efficacy and safety, but to also
gain further insights into how we can
provide additional value for patients and
investigator sites. Innovations in patient
recruitment coupled with thoughtful
local implementation are a step forward
in our relentless pursuit to simplify the
patient journey.
Local implementation
of patient recruitment
innovation requires
knowledge of not only
the challenges, but
also the needs of the
specific markets.
Clinical TriAls
33. 31w w w . p h a r m a f o c u s a s i a . c o m
Landmark global XANTUS real-world programme showed
low rates of stroke and major bleeding of 0.9 per cent
and 1.7 per cent per year respectively with rivaroxaban,
generally consistent with Phase III Rocket AF trial.
John Battersby, Medical Writer, Bridges Publishing Pte Ltd
Low Rates of Stroke
and Major Bleeding with
Rivaroxaban Confirmed
by Global Study
XANTUS pooled results study
R
esults of the pooled analysis
of the global XANTUS real-
world study programme were
announced recently at the European
Society of Cardiology (ESC) Congress
in Barcelona, Spain.The study investigated
the use of the non-vitamin K antagonist
oral anticoagulant (NOAC) rivaroxaban
for stroke prevention in patients
with non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation
(AF) (irregular heart beat). The study
showed low rates of both stroke and
major bleeding, including fatal
intracranial (skull) bleeds in AF patients
on Xarelto® for stroke prevention. The
majority (96.1 per cent) of the pooled
XANTUS population did not experience
stroke / systemic embolism, major
bleeding and all-cause death. This is
generally consistent with the Phase III
ROCKET AF trial and reaffirms the
safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban in AF
management.
The global XANTUS programme
is the largest prospective observational
study on a single NOAC for stroke
prevention in AF. This pooled analysis
combined real-world data from three
prospective, single-arm, multi-centre
studies across multiple regions, which
together followed more than 11,000
patients from 47 countries:
1. XANTUS, the largest of the studies,
which followed 6,784 patients from
Canada, Israel and 10 countries across
Europe.
Clinical TriAls
34. 32 Pharma Focus Asia ISSUE - 29 2017
2. XANAP, the first Pan-Asian real-
world study of rivaroxaban in AF
stroke prevention, which followed 2,273
patients from 10 countries / territories
in Asia (Hong Kong SAR, Indonesia,
South Korea, Malaysia, Philippines,
Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand, Vietnam
and Pakistan).
3. XANTUS-EL which involved 2,101
patients from 17 countries in Eastern
Europe, Middle East, Africa, and Latin
America.
Unmet Needs in Atrial Fibrillation
(AF)
AF is a heart condition characterised
by irregular heartbeats which increases
the risk of stroke caused by blood clots
by five-fold. Strokes due to AF are also
more severe, causing disability in over
50 per cent of patients and generally
worse outcomes than strokes due to other
causes. The incidence of AF increases
with age.
The prevalence of AF is a global
issue with the number of AF patients
growing rapidly and expected to have
doubled by 2050. AF is especially of
concern in Asia due the regions rapidly
ageing populations. It is estimated that
by 2050, Asia will have 72 million
AF patients, and 2.9 million among
them will suffer from an AF-associated
stroke.
The good news is AF-related strokes
can be prevented. However, there is still
a significant number of AF patients in
Asia not receiving optimal anticoagulant
therapy for stroke prevention. Older
anticoagulant therapy with Vitamin K
Antagonist (VKAs) such as warfarin
makes effective anticoagulation harder
for patients and physicians due to its
manifold food and drug interactions,
regular blood monitoring requirements
and risk of intracranial (skull) bleeding.
These serious disadvantages cause VKAs
to be under-used or under-dosed in
AF stroke prevention, leaving patients
unprotected.
“NOACs like rivaroxaban can
potentially address this medical
challenge as they are at least as effective
as traditional warfarin therapy in
preventing strokes in AF patients,
but are easier to administer and carry
a significantly lower risk of the life-
threatening intracranial bleeding,” said
Professor John Camm, the Professor
of Clinical Cardiology at St George’s
University of London who presented the
results at ESC. “While this has been well
proven in clinical trials and real-world
studies, the consistency of the combined
data from the worldwide XANTUS
programme adds significantly to our
understanding on the safety of NOACs
in AF patients, and gives physicians the
confidence to prescribe rivaroxaban in
daily clinical practice.”
The Studies
In the XANTUS pooled analysis, a total
of 11,121 patients were enrolled into the
three real-world studies and included
in the analysis. Patients were from 47
countries in Western Europe / Canada/
Israel (47.5 per cent), Eastern Europe
(23.2 per cent), East Asia (20.1per cent),
the Middle East/Africa (6.2 per cent) and
Latin America (3.0 per cent). The major-
ity of patients (73.1per cent) initially
received rivaroxaban 20mg once daily,
while 25.1 per cent, 1.6 per cent and 0.2
per cent of patients received rivaroxaban
15mg once daily, 10mg once daily and
other doses, respectively. There were
differences in patient demographics,
Clinical TriAls
35. 33w w w . p h a r m a f o c u s a s i a . c o m
clinical characteristics as well as stroke
and bleeding risks among the study
regions. Patients with higher CHADS2
(stroke risk) or CHA2DS2-VASc (bleed-
ing risk) scores at baseline were more
likely to experience major bleeding,
stroke /systemic embolism or death.
Results from XANTUS pooled
population showed low rates of both
stroke and major bleeding with rivar-
oxaban at 0.9 per cent and 1.7per cent
per year respectively, generally consist-
ent with those in the ROCKET AF
trial. Mean CHADS2 (stroke risk) and
CHA2DS2-VASc (bleeding risk) scores
for the pooled population were 2.0 and
3.5 respectively.
The findings were generally
consistent across different regions and
patient populations worldwide based
on each of the individual studies. In
XANAP, the Asian arm of XANTUS
programme, the rates of both stroke and
major bleeding were low at 1.7 per cent
and 1.5 per cent respectively, generally
consistent with Phase III ROCKET AF
East Asia study and two other studies
in the programme. CHADS2 (stroke
risk) and CHA2DS2-VASc (bleeding
risk) scores in XANAP were 2.3 and 3.7
respectively, higher than the mean scores
of the XANTUS pooled population The
majority (96.6 per cent) of patients
on rivaroxaban in the study did not
experience stroke / systemic embolism,
major bleeding, and all-cause death.
About XANTUS Pooled Analysis
This is a pre-planned pooled analysis
of the prospective, observational
XANTUS, XANAP and XANTUS-EL
studies of unselected patients with
AF newly starting rivaroxaban for stroke
prevention. Patients were followed
for 1 year, at ~3-month intervals,
or for ≥30 days after permanent
discontinuation. Primary outcomes
were major bleeding, Adverse Events
(AEs) or Serious AEs (SAEs) and all-cause
mortality. Secondary outcomes included
symptomatic thromboembolic events and
non-major bleeding. Treatment-emergent
major outcomes were adjudicated by
a central committee. 11,121 patients
were included (Western Europe/Canada/
Israel: 47.5per cent; Eastern Europe:
23.2 per cent; East Asia: 20.1 per
cent; Middle East and Africa: 6.2per
cent; and Latin America: 3per cent).
Of the patients 73.1per cent received
rivaroxaban 20mg once daily (od) and
25.1per cent rivaroxaban 15mg (od);
72.4per cent had prior anticoagulation
therapy. Mean age was 70.5 years and
mean weight was 80.0kg.Co-morbidities
included congestive heart failure
(21.2per cent), hypertension (76.2per
cent), diabetes mellitus (22.3per cent),
prior stroke/non-central nervous system
(CNS) systemic embolism (SE)/transient
ischaemic attack (TIA; 21.3per cent) and
prior myocardial infarction (MI; 8.9per
cent). Rates of treatment-emergent
major outcomes were: major bleeding
1.7 (1.5–2.0); all-cause mortality 1.9
(1.6–2.2); stroke/non-CNS SE 1.0
(0.8–1.2); stroke 0.9 (0.7–1.1).
About XANAP
XANAPis the first Pan-Asian,
prospective, single-arm, observational
study of 2,273 patients designed by Bayer
to evaluate the safety and effectiveness
of rivaroxaban for stroke prevention
with non-valvular AF from 435 sites
across Asia (Hong Kong SAR, Indonesia,
South Korea, Malaysia, Philippines,
The global XANTUS
programme is the
largest prospective
observational study
on a single NOAC
for stroke prevention
in AF.
Clinical TriAls
36. 34 Pharma Focus Asia ISSUE - 29 2017
AuthorBIO
John has been science and technical writer
for many years and has focused on medical
and healthcare issues for more than a
decade. He has spent the last 20 years in
South East Asia, mainly based in Singapore,
working as a freelance journalist and media
adviser to the pharmaceutical industry.
Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand, Vietnam
and Pakistan) in routine clinical practice.
All treatment and dosing decisions
were at the discretion of the treating
physicians and patients were followed
up for one year or until 30 days after
premature discontinuation. Bleeding
events and major thromboembolic
events were centrally adjudicated by
an independent committee.
At the end of the study, the
majority (96.6 per cent) of patients
on rivaroxaban did not experience
stroke / systemic embolism, treatment-
emergent major bleeding, and all-cause
death. Overall, patients experienced
treatment-emergent major bleeding
at a rate of 1.5 per 100 patient-years
(1.5 per cent per year); most of these
major bleeds were treated using standard
clinical measures. Rates of fatal bleeding
were 0.2 per 100 patient-years 0.2 per cent
per year). Critical organ bleeding
occurred at a rate of 0.8 per 100
patient-years (0.8 per cent per year),
which included intracranial bleeding
at a rate of 0.7 per 100 patient-years
(0.7 per cent per year). Stroke occurred
at a rate of 1.7 per 100 patient-years
(1.7per cent per year). The analyses from
this study provide valuable insights on
the usage of rivaroxaban by patients
in Asia for non-valvular AF stroke
prevention.
“Strokes in AF patients are highly
preventable. These robust findings
further support rivaroxaban as a therapy
of choice for stroke prevention in
AF patients, with a low rate of major
bleeding,” said Dr Foo Chuan Kit,
Head of Medical Affairs of Bayer
Pharmaceuticals Division for Asia-
Pacific. “By involving Asian patients
in this worldwide programme, we
offer valuable insights to help physicians
in the region safely and effectively
lower the risk of stroke in their AF
patients.”
Latest ESC Guidelines NOACs are
recommended as first-line anticoagulants
in the prevention of AF-associated stroke
in the latest international guidelines for
the management of AF by the European
Society of Cardiology (ESC). It is
stated that NOACs offer better efficacy,
safety and convenience compared
with VKAs. NOACs are broadly
preferable to VKAs in the vast majority
of patients with AF.
About Rivaroxaban
Rivaroxaban is the world’s most
widely prescribed NOAC that has
been prescribed to 31 million patients
worldwide and more than 3 million
patients in Asia-Pacific for the
management of blood clots in seven
distinct indications, including stroke
prevention in AF.
Rivaroxaban is also the most
broadly indicated NOAC, approved
for seven indications, protecting
patients across more venous and arterial
thromboembolic conditions than any
other NOAC:
1.The prevention of stroke and systemic
embolism in adult patients with
non-valvular AF with one or more
risk factors
2.The treatment of Deep Vein
Thrombosis (DVT) in adults
3.The treatment of Pulmonary Embolism
(PE) in adults
4.The prevention of recurrent DVT and
PE in adults
5.The prevention of Venous
Thromboembolism (VTE) in adult
patients under going elective hip
replacement surgery
6. The prevention of VTE in adult
patients undergoing elective knee
replacement surgery
7. The prevention of atherothrombotic
events (cardiovascular death, myocardial
infarction or stroke) after an Acute
Coronary Syndrome (ACS) in adult
patients with elevated cardiac biomarkers
and no prior stroke or transient
ischaemic attack when co-administered
with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) alone
or with ASA plusclopidogrel or
ticlopidine.
While regulatory approvals may
differ from country to country, across
all indications, rivaroxaban is approved
in more than 130 countries.
References are available at www.
pharmafocusasia.com
XANAP is the first
Pan-Asian, prospective,
single-arm, observational
study of 2,273 patients
designed by Bayer to
evaluate the safety
and effectiveness
of rivaroxaban for
stroke prevention with
non-valvular AF from
435 sites across Asia.
Clinical TriAls
38. 36 Pharma Focus Asia ISSUE - 29 2017
W
ith the demand for wearables
and sensors in clinical trials
on the rise, pharmaceutical
companies are increasingly faced with
the challenges of both rising costs and
market saturation of similar drugs –
and that is where Clinical Research
Organisations (CROs) come into play.
From both a technology perspective
and a processes perspective, CROs
can leverage remote medical devices,
unleashing an opportunity to collect
novel endpoints and supplemental data
that may improve the regulatory case.
This also opens the door for CROs to
make the case for reimbursement more
As real world evidence becomes an integral
part for many clinical trials, wearables allow
for monitoring and data collection anywhere
the patient is located – freeing researchers of
the location barrier of real world evidence.
Xavier Flinois, President, PAREXEL Informatics
Wearables in
Clinical Trials
Where we are &
where we are going
Clinical TriAls
39. 37w w w . p h a r m a f o c u s a s i a . c o m
compelling, open up trial participation
to a wider population and/or reduce
site visits for patients who may not live
close to an investigative site.
Although medical devices like
spirometers and activity monitors have
been used in clinical trials for almost a
decade, modern wearable technology
is improving the patient experience
and lessening the data management
burden. Outdated spirometers or activity
monitors had to be transported back
to the clinical site, where the data was
then transcribed into an Electronic Data
Capture (EDC) system, and downloaded
– a process prone to transcription and
human errors. Now wearables are more
scalable and allow clinical sites to
digitally collect the information without
transporting or transcribing. These
updates improve both trial efficiency
and data accuracy.
Regulating Medical Devices
The use of medical devices for study
endpoints has yet to receive regulatory
guidance, but at a Drug Information
Association Meeting in December
2016, the Federal Drug Administration
(FDA) expressed cautious optimism that
these devices could provide better and
more timely insight into a patient’s
health status. FDA speakers went so
far as to say that researchers need not
necessarily use medical devices with a
510(k) approval or CE stamp; consumer
grade devices can be used as long as
they are ‘fit for purpose.’ As regulators
and drug companies accept the use of
wearables, medical devices will play a
more prominent role in clinical trial
data collection, particularly in Phase
II and III trials.
Wearables by Phase: Phase I
With the initial influx of information
gathering in Phase I, wearables fit well
into the protocol of the early clinical
stage. One instance of this was a trial
that added remote sensors into Phase I.
The objective of adding this technology
was to both pilot the new sensors as
well as to compare the sensor data to
the in-clinic data for a diabetes trial.
With successful collaboration, the trial
facilitators were able to produce a trial
design that minimised the impact on
the core protocol while maximising the
number of devices. In all, six remote
medical devices were added to the
study –spirometer, blood pressure,
pulse oximeter, blood glucose monitor,
weight scale and activity monitor. Site
and subject acceptance was high. It
is expected that Sponsors developing
new biologics where the benefit is best
measured by sensors and/or where
sensors provide valuable health status
information to subjects, will begin
piloting the applicable sensors in Phase I
in parallel to their first in human clinical
trials.
Wearables by Phase: Phase II-III
Because of the lack of regulatory
guidance, the validated use of specific
mobile health devices to deliver
primary endpoint data is expected
over the next 12–24 months. In Phase
II and III trials, clinical trial sponsors
will likely use medical devices as
exploratory endpoints to mature their
understanding of the utility of sensor-
based endpoints. For some disorders,
medical devices will be used across
all phases as combination products.
According to the FDA, “Combination
products are therapeutic and diagnostic
products that combine drugs, devices,
and/or biological products. FDA expects
to receive large numbers of combination
products for review as technological
advances continue to merge product
types and blur the historical lines of
separation between FDA’s medical
product centers, which are made up of
the Center for Biologics Evaluation and
Research (CBER), the Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research (CDER), and
the Center for Devices and Radiological
Health (CDRH).”11
Wearables by Phase: Phase IV
The growing demand for wearables in
clinical trials is also being seen in Phase
IV studies. The post-marketing demands
and remote connectivity make wearables
an ideal Phase IV component. Sponsors
have the opportunity to make a strong
case to regulators, especially in regard
to why certain drugs should move to
an over-the-counter status since the
general population has the ability to
use commonly available medical devices
to either self-diagnose or monitor a
particular health condition.
Thanks to the maturation of this
technology medical devices can now
securely and wirelessly transfer data,
increasing the integrity of clinical trial
data. For example, once a reading is
taken on a blood pressure monitor, that
data is automatically downloaded to a
hub (a device plugged into an electrical
outlet). The patient then plugs in the
hub once and takes his or her readings
on the prescribed schedule. All of the
data transfer is handled seamlessly and
securely without the need for manual
intervention – reducing the chance of
human error. If the patient forgets to
plug in the hub, the data is stored on
the medical device until it’s plugged
in. Alternatively, there is an option to
securely transfer data via a companion
app on a smartphone.
What Else can Wearables Enable?
Medical devices offer a multitude of
possibilities for researchers that go
1 “About Combination Products” - https://www.fda.gov/
CombinationProducts/AboutCombinationProducts
Effective medical
device use requires
best-in-class medical,
HEOR, biostatistics,
logistics, technology
and clinical trial
conduct capabilities.
Clinical TriAls
40. 38 Pharma Focus Asia ISSUE - 29 2017
far beyond collecting blood pressure.
Using the data collected from wearables,
predictive analytics may allow medical
devices to alert researchers of future
medical events. The application of
predictive analytics to connected
medical device data may enable the
identification of subjects who are who
are not protocol compliant such that the
sites can intervene to increase subject
retention. A predictive analytics for
sensor-based data will enable increased
patient retention and safety.
Wearables not only simplify data
collection and improve patient safety; this
technology allows for the advancement of
international partnerships where multiple
teams can be connected in real-time.
Remote and in-clinic data can be “fused”
together for sites and study teams to
view side-by-side in Phase I-IV clinical
trials. This takes away the barrier of
geographic location for multiple sites
working across the globe, and allowing
this increased comparison of diverse data
will increase the integrity of the results
on an international scale.
The value of wearables is not limited
to trials sites. As Real World Evidence
(RWE) becomes an integral part for
many clinical trials, wearables allow
for monitoring and data collection
anywhere the patient is located – freeing
researchers of the location barrier of
RWE Wearables have created a structure
where data collection is aboundary-free
factor in clinical trial management.
End-to-End Medical Device
Components
It is critical that Sponsors leverage a
medical device solution that securely
and wirelessly transmits the data with
the ability to store, visualise and alert
from the big data time series data;
however, the application of medical
devices is not just a technology exercise.
The performance of medical devices
must be evaluated prior to use for
study endpoints to understand if the
device generates data within acceptable
parameters and in comparison to the
manufacturer's claims.
Informed Consent Forms must be
adapted for the collection of personal
data and there are data storage and
data transmission/re-use implications,
particularly in the European Union.
There are health economic and outcomes
research considerations that must be
taken into account to ensure that the
associated endpoints are fit for purpose
for regulatory submissions.
Logistics also plays an important
role on the front end, when devices are
acquired, kitted and distributed to sites
in a timely manner that accommodates
the storage limitation at the sites. At
the end of a trial, the devices need to
be returned; cleansed or destroyed; and
all data deleted from the device.
Effective medical device use
requires best-in-class medical, HEOR,
biostatistics, logistics, technology and
clinical trial conduct capabilities.
Where does this Go Next?
So where can wearables take the
industry? The shrinking size of medical
devices and connected implantable
device along with evolving technology
will further enable the collection of
novel and complementary data to
support regulatory submissions and
reimbursement.
With experience and regulatory
acceptance, the potential for connected
medical devices is extraordinary. These
devices have the potential to change
the way clinical trials are conducted; to
broaden participation in clinical trials
at a time when subject recruitment is
major barrier; to enable virtual trials;
and to reduce clinical trial costs. The
challenge today is not deciding on
whether to use a mobile health device,
but the effective integration into drug
development programmes.
AuthorBIO
Xavier Flinois leads PAREXEL’s Informatics division, which
provides innovative technology solutions to help optimise patient
engagement, clinical and regulatory processes. He brings to
PAREXEL more than 25 years of experience in technology and
healthcare, including senior leadership positions with global
companies in the clinical software, consulting and IT services areas.
Clinical TriAls
41. 39w w w . p h a r m a f o c u s a s i a . c o m
42. 40 Pharma Focus Asia ISSUE - 29 2017
Technology transfer is not just limited to
industries and R&D. A research scientist working
in R&D may also work with universities. There
are several examples of patent or product
commercialisation happening in universities.
This article focuses on how technology transfer
can be coupled with knowledge translation.
Vivek Dave, Sachdev Yadav, Harshavardhan ML Yadav, Isha Mehta
Department of Pharmacy, Banasthali University
Merging Technology
Transfer with Knowledge
Translation
Academic to industrial research
T
he government and research academics are
increasingly aware of the relevance of their
result to the industrial sector. The term
knowledge translation was coined to represent
proactive strategies to communicate research findings
to those in a position to put the findings into practice.
As it happens in most cases, the first consideration is
given to market size. Simply put, it means that the
market where we are supposed to market the product
should be large enough to trade it in a very big
volume. Moreover, it is very important to see weather
Research & Development
43. 41w w w . p h a r m a f o c u s a s i a . c o m
the intended result can be patentable or
not, especially in the pharmaceutical
industries. Technology transfer does not
always involve a patentable invention, but
also the transfer of the intact technology
including copyrights, proficiency, and
others. A good patent is that which cannot
be overcome by any other universities; a
weak patent will allow other universities
or researchers to come up with good
amendments on our idea leading to the
problems of licensing. Some universities
require employees and graduate students
to report all inventions to the universities
and, upon request, execute a formal
assignment document. The Bayh Dole
Act, a nonprofit organisational research
and its documentation work that is
closely concerned to the field, permits
funding agencies to grant inventors
requests to retain title, provided the
universities have waived election of the
title. However, if universities believe an
invention is valuable, they will usually
elect title, apply for patents, and then
license the rights exclusively back to the
inventors. This is the procedure usually
followed in the case of inventors who
obtain venture capital to form companies
to develop their discoveries. However,
a number of universities support their
employees who wish to preserve the title
to their inventions, and have sensible plans
to ensure growth. Most universities also
assert ownership over non patentable
materials created by their employees
and recorded information generated
by their employees. The quality of
industry technology transfers is based
on the student and industry relationships.
The interaction with industry can also
educate faculty and students with regard
to salaries and working conditions in
industry. Students learn that scientists
in industry also publish. They learn that
scientists in industry can spend less time
raising funds for their labs than those
in academia. It also has the potential
for educating them with regard to the
rewards of working in industry. This
interaction can go a long way towards
ridding industry of the stigma that
has caused it recruitment problems in
the past. Technology transfer can also
provide funds for students and resources
for enhancing programmes. They set
some goals for preparing and distributing
technology transfer guidelines which are
shown in figure 1.
The Bayh Dole Act Providing
the Platform for Universities
Technology Transfer
The Bayh Dole Act enacted on
December 12, 1980 (The Patent &
Trademark Act Amendments) (Public
Law 96-517) created a uniform patent
policy among federal agencies that fund
research. Bayh-Dole enables small
businesses and non-profit organisations,
including universities, to retain title to
materials and products they invent under
federal funding. Subsequent amendments
created uniform licensing guidelines
and expanded the law to include all
federally funded contractors (Public Law
98-620). The implementing regulations
for Bayh-Dole are published at 37 CFR
Part 401.
Regulations Implementing Federal
Patent and Licensing Policy
Regarding ‘Rights to Inventions
Made by Nonprofit Organisations,
Universities and Small Business
Firms’ are Codified at 37 Cfr Part
401. The Following Summarises
the Significant Aspects of these
Regulations
• The provisions apply to all inventions
conceived or first actually reduced
to practice in the performance of a
federal grant, contract, or cooperative
agreement. This is true even if the
federal government is not the sole source
of funding for either the conception or
the reduction to practice. The provisions
do not, however, apply to federal grants
that are primarily for the training of
students and postdoctoral scientists
• The university has an obligation to
disclose each new invention to the
federal funding agency within two
months after the inventor discloses it
in writing to the universities
• The decision whether or not to retain
title to the invention must be made
within two years after disclosing the
invention to the agency. This time may
be shortened, if, due to publication
of research results or public use, the
one-year US statutory patent bar
has been set in motion. Under such
circumstances, the universities must
make an election at least sixty days
before the end of the statutory period.
If the university does not elect to retain
title, the agency may take title to the
invention
• Upon election of title, the universities
must file a patent application within
one year, or prior to the end of any
Research & Development
Figure 1 Goals for preparing and distributing technology transfer guidelines
Defining Rights
And Responsibilities
Goals
Revneu for the
creator students
Assisting students in
commercialising their
products
Making inventions
available tp all
consumers