SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 12
Download to read offline
3
4
5
6
Total N = 2,269,475, 60% private only, 40% any public
7
• Method 2 alone attributed 99.99% of enrollees with any public insurance
and 52% of enrollees with private insurance only.
• Method 3 had the highest attribution rate (58%) among privately insured
enrollees, and the cumulative attribution rate of Methods 1–3 was 78% in
that cohort.
• Methods 4–6 did not yield any additional enrollee attributions above what
Methods 1–3 produced.
8
• Methods 1 and 3 had the highest agreement (77% in private only, 80% in
any public).
• Between 34% and 80% of those whose PCP can be identified by more
than one method were assigned to the same provider by both methods.
• Insurer assignment (Method 2) and the functional assignment methods
agree about 24% to 55% of the time.
9
10
11
2016_Lines_APCD_PCP_attribution_APHA

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Climuse Paris musées se met en Seine
Climuse Paris musées se met en SeineClimuse Paris musées se met en Seine
Climuse Paris musées se met en SeineAube Lebel
 
SIP REPORT Risk management mechanism in Stock Exchange How efficient is it
SIP REPORT Risk management mechanism in Stock Exchange How efficient is itSIP REPORT Risk management mechanism in Stock Exchange How efficient is it
SIP REPORT Risk management mechanism in Stock Exchange How efficient is itsmriti35rekha
 
Social Media KPI - english
Social Media KPI - englishSocial Media KPI - english
Social Media KPI - englishsocialBench
 
Updates in CAP,HAP, VAP, AECOPD and pneumonia severity scores
Updates in CAP,HAP,  VAP, AECOPD and pneumonia severity scoresUpdates in CAP,HAP,  VAP, AECOPD and pneumonia severity scores
Updates in CAP,HAP, VAP, AECOPD and pneumonia severity scoresGamal Agmy
 

Viewers also liked (6)

Climuse Paris musées se met en Seine
Climuse Paris musées se met en SeineClimuse Paris musées se met en Seine
Climuse Paris musées se met en Seine
 
Tributo mapa mental
Tributo mapa mentalTributo mapa mental
Tributo mapa mental
 
Waste water treatment
Waste water treatmentWaste water treatment
Waste water treatment
 
SIP REPORT Risk management mechanism in Stock Exchange How efficient is it
SIP REPORT Risk management mechanism in Stock Exchange How efficient is itSIP REPORT Risk management mechanism in Stock Exchange How efficient is it
SIP REPORT Risk management mechanism in Stock Exchange How efficient is it
 
Social Media KPI - english
Social Media KPI - englishSocial Media KPI - english
Social Media KPI - english
 
Updates in CAP,HAP, VAP, AECOPD and pneumonia severity scores
Updates in CAP,HAP,  VAP, AECOPD and pneumonia severity scoresUpdates in CAP,HAP,  VAP, AECOPD and pneumonia severity scores
Updates in CAP,HAP, VAP, AECOPD and pneumonia severity scores
 

2016_Lines_APCD_PCP_attribution_APHA

  • 1.
  • 2.
  • 3. 3
  • 4. 4
  • 5. 5
  • 6. 6
  • 7. Total N = 2,269,475, 60% private only, 40% any public 7
  • 8. • Method 2 alone attributed 99.99% of enrollees with any public insurance and 52% of enrollees with private insurance only. • Method 3 had the highest attribution rate (58%) among privately insured enrollees, and the cumulative attribution rate of Methods 1–3 was 78% in that cohort. • Methods 4–6 did not yield any additional enrollee attributions above what Methods 1–3 produced. 8
  • 9. • Methods 1 and 3 had the highest agreement (77% in private only, 80% in any public). • Between 34% and 80% of those whose PCP can be identified by more than one method were assigned to the same provider by both methods. • Insurer assignment (Method 2) and the functional assignment methods agree about 24% to 55% of the time. 9
  • 10. 10
  • 11. 11