SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 9
Download to read offline
#2008-027
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY

In the Matter of: )
Wachovia Bank, National Association ) AA-EC-08-13
Charlotte, North Carolina )
CONSENT ORDER FOR A CIVIL MONEY PENALTY
The Comptroller of the Currency of the United States of America (“Comptroller”),
through his National Bank Examiner, has examined the affairs of Wachovia Bank, National
Association, Charlotte, North Carolina (“Bank”).
The Bank, by and through its duly elected and acting Board of Directors (“Board”), has
executed a “Stipulation and Consent to the Issuance of a Consent Order for a Civil Money
Penalty,” dated April 24, 2008, that is accepted by the Comptroller. By this Stipulation and
Consent, which is incorporated by reference, the Bank has consented to the issuance of this
Consent Order for a Civil Money Penalty (“Order”) by the Comptroller.
The Bank, by and through its Board, has also executed an Agreement By and Between
the Bank and the Comptroller, dated April 24, 2008.
ARTICLE I
COMPTROLLER’S FINDINGS
The Comptroller finds, and the Bank neither admits nor denies, without any adjudication
on the merits, the following:
(1) From on or about June 1, 2003, until on or about December 31, 2006, the Bank
maintained account relationships with certain payment processors for telemarketers, and direct
telemarketers, including Payment Processing Center, LLC (“PPC”), FTN Promotions, Inc. dba
Suntasia, Inc. (“Suntasia”), Netchex Corp., Your Money Access LLC (“Netchex/YMA”), and
related companies (collectively, “the payment processors and direct telemarketers”).
(2) As part of their business activities, the payment processors and direct
telemarketers regularly deposited large numbers of remotely created checks (“RCCs”) in their
accounts at the Bank.
(3) A substantial number of the RCCs deposited by the payment processors and direct
telemarketers were returned to the Bank by or on behalf of consumers whose bank account
information appeared on the RCCs for a number of reasons, including that consumers had not
authorized the RCCs or that consumers did not receive adequate consideration in the transaction.
(4) Consumers were harmed in connection with the payment processors’ and direct
telemarketers’ relationships with the Bank.
(5) In connection with its handling of the account activities of the payment processors
and direct telemarketers, the Bank engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, including, but not
limited to:
(a)	 failure to conduct suitable due diligence on the accounts even though the
Bank had reason to know that the payment processors and direct
telemarketers were high-risk customers that posed significant legal,
reputational and monetary risks to the Bank and monetary risk to
consumers;
(b)	 failure to recognize and properly address the risks posed by the activities
of the payment processors and direct telemarketers;
2
(c) failure to monitor the rates of return on the RCCs deposited into the
accounts and to respond to allegations of consumer fraud from other banks
and consumers; and
(d)	 failure to follow the Bank’s normal procedures for handling returned
RCCs and implementation of a policy that had the effect of minimizing
consumer complaints and scrutiny of the Bank’s relationships with the
payment processors and direct telemarketers.
(6) In connection with its handling of the account activities of the payment processors
and direct telemarketers, the Bank engaged in unfair practices in violation of Section 5 of the
Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. Section 45(a)(1).
(7) The Bank’s handling of the account activities of the payment processors and
direct telemarketers was part of a pattern of misconduct that resulted in financial gain to the
Bank in the form of fee income from the payment processors and direct telemarketers on
returned RCCs, and a pattern or practice of disregard of the interests of consumers involved in
transactions with the payment processors and direct telemarketers.
ARTICLE II

ORDER FOR A CIVIL MONEY PENALTY

(1) Without admitting or denying any wrongdoing, the Bank hereby consents to the
payment of a civil money penalty in the amount of ten million dollars ($10,000,000), which shall
be paid upon execution of this Order.
(a)	 If a check is the selected method of payment, the check shall be made
payable to the Treasurer of the United States and shall be delivered to:
3
Comptroller of the Currency, P.O. Box 979012, St. Louis, Missouri
63197-9000.
(b)	 If a wire transfer is the selected method of payment, it must be sent to the
Comptroller’s account #XXXXXXX, ABA Routing # XXXXXXX.
(c)	 A photocopy of the payment document or confirmation of the wire
transfer shall be sent immediately, by overnight delivery, to the Director
of Enforcement and Compliance, Office of the Comptroller of the
Currency, 250 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20219.
(2) This Order shall be enforceable to the same extent and in the same manner as an
effective and outstanding order that has been issued and has become final pursuant to 12 U.S.C.
§§ 1818(h) and (i) (as amended).
ARTICLE III 

CLOSING

(1) It is expressly and clearly understood that if, at any time, the Comptroller deems it
appropriate in fulfilling the responsibilities placed upon him by the several laws of the United
States of America to undertake any action affecting the Bank, nothing in this Order shall in any
way inhibit, estop, bar or otherwise prevent the Comptroller from so doing.
(2) This Order is intended to be, and shall be construed to be, a final order issued
pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 1818(i)(2), and expressly does not form, and may not be construed to
form, a contract binding on the Comptroller or the United States.
(3) The terms of this Order, including this paragraph, are not subject to amendment or
modification by any extraneous expression, prior agreements or prior arrangements between the
parties, whether oral or written.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 24th
day of April 2008.
/s/ Delora Ng Jee
Delora Ng Jee
Deputy Comptroller
Large Bank Supervision
5
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY 

In the Matter of: )
Wachovia Bank, National Association ) AA-EC-08-13
Charlotte, North Carolina )
STIPULATION AND CONSENT TO THE ISSUANCE
OF A CONSENT ORDER FOR A CIVIL MONEY PENALTY
The Comptroller of the Currency of the United States of America (“Comptroller”) intends
to initiate a civil money penalty proceeding against Wachovia Bank, National Association,
Charlotte, North Carolina (“Bank”) pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 1818(i) for unsafe and unsound
banking practices and violations of law relating to the Bank’s banking relationships with certain
third party payment processors for telemarketers, and direct telemarketers.
The Bank, in the interest of compliance and cooperation, consents to the issuance of a
Consent Order for a Civil Money Penalty, dated April 24, 2008 (“Order”);
In consideration of the above premises, the Comptroller, through his authorized
representative, and the Bank, through its duly elected and acting Board of Directors, hereby
stipulate and agree to the following:
ARTICLE I
Jurisdiction
(1) The Bank is a national banking association chartered and examined by the
Comptroller pursuant to the National Bank Act of 1864, as amended, 12 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.
(2) The Comptroller is “the appropriate Federal banking agency” regarding the Bank
pursuant to 12 U.S.C. §§ 1813(q) and 1818(i).
- 1 -
(3) The Bank is an “insured depository institution” within the meaning of 12 U.S.C.
§ 1818(i).
ARTICLE II

Agreement

(1) The Bank, without admitting or denying any wrongdoing, hereby consents and
agrees to the issuance of the Order by the Comptroller.
(2) The Bank further agrees that said Order shall be deemed an “order issued with the
consent of the depository institution” as defined in 12 U.S.C. § 1818(h)(2), and consents and
agrees that said Order shall become effective upon its issuance and shall be fully enforceable by
the Comptroller under the provisions of 12 U.S.C. § 1818(i). Notwithstanding the absence of
mutuality of obligation, or of consideration, or of a contract, the Comptroller may enforce any of
the commitments or obligations herein undertaken by the Bank under his supervisory powers,
including 12 U.S.C. § 1818(i), and not as a matter of contract law. The Bank expressly
acknowledges that neither the Bank nor the Comptroller has any intention to enter into a
contract.
(3) The Bank also expressly acknowledges that no officer or employee of the
Comptroller has statutory or other authority to bind the United States, the U.S. Treasury
Department, the Comptroller, or any other federal bank regulatory agency or entity, or any
officer or employee of any of those entities to a contract affecting the Comptroller’s exercise of
his supervisory responsibilities.
- 2 -
ARTICLE III 

Waivers

(1) The Bank, by signing this Stipulation and Consent, hereby waives:
(a) the issuance of a Notice of Charges pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 1818(b);
(b) all rights to a hearing and a final agency decision pursuant to 12 U.S.C.
§ 1818(i), 12 C.F.R. Part 19
(c) all rights to seek any type of administrative or judicial review of the
Order;
(d) any and all rights to challenge or contest the validity of the Order; and
(e) any and all claims for fees, costs or expenses against the Comptroller, or
any of its agents or employees, related in any way to this enforcement matter or
this Order, whether arising under common law or under the terms of any statute,
including, but not limited to, the Equal Access to Justice Act, 5 U.S.C. § 504 and
28 U.S.C. § 2412.
ARTICLE IV

Other Action

(1) The Bank agrees that the provisions of this Stipulation and Consent shall not
inhibit, estop, bar, or otherwise prevent the Comptroller from taking any other action affecting
the Bank if, at any time, it deems it appropriate to do so to fulfill the responsibilities placed upon
it by the several laws of the United States of America.
- 3 -
(2) The Bank understands that nothing herein shall preclude any proceedings brought
by the Comptroller to enforce the terms of this Order, and that nothing herein constitutes, nor
shall the Bank contend that it constitutes, a waiver of any right, power, or authority of any other
representatives of the United States or agencies thereof, including the Department of Justice, to
bring other actions deemed appropriate.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the undersigned, authorized by the Comptroller as his
representative, has hereunto set her hand on behalf of the Comptroller.
/s/ Delora Ng Jee 04/24/2008
Delora Ng Jee Date
Deputy Comptroller
Large Bank Supervision
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the undersigned, as the duly elected and acting Board of
Directors of the Bank, have hereunto set their hands on behalf of the Bank.
G. Kennedy Thompson /S/
Mark C. Treanor /S/
Benjamin P. Jenkins III /S/
Stanhope A. Kelly /S/
Date 04/24/08
Date 04/24/08
Date 04/24/08
Date 04/24/08
Donald K. Truslow /S/
Thomas J. Wurtz /S/
Date 04/24/08
Date 04/24/08
- 4 -

More Related Content

What's hot

By law banking
By law bankingBy law banking
By law bankingyang9xs
 
Fair Credit Reporting Act
Fair Credit Reporting Act Fair Credit Reporting Act
Fair Credit Reporting Act driverajmls
 
Bankruptcy-Unit4A-EV
Bankruptcy-Unit4A-EVBankruptcy-Unit4A-EV
Bankruptcy-Unit4A-EVErica Vazquez
 
MINING INDUSTRY: A critical analysis through application of Rule 12(10) of MC...
MINING INDUSTRY: A critical analysis through application of Rule 12(10) of MC...MINING INDUSTRY: A critical analysis through application of Rule 12(10) of MC...
MINING INDUSTRY: A critical analysis through application of Rule 12(10) of MC...Biswajit Das
 
State of wash case mandatory arbitration clause in an insurance contract wa...
State of wash case   mandatory arbitration clause in an insurance contract wa...State of wash case   mandatory arbitration clause in an insurance contract wa...
State of wash case mandatory arbitration clause in an insurance contract wa...Umesh Heendeniya
 
re22DocumentRegistrationAgreement
re22DocumentRegistrationAgreementre22DocumentRegistrationAgreement
re22DocumentRegistrationAgreementKaren Alridge
 
HIPAA Security Rule consent agreement with OCR
HIPAA Security Rule consent agreement with OCRHIPAA Security Rule consent agreement with OCR
HIPAA Security Rule consent agreement with OCRDavid Sweigert
 
Enfgrowthcomplaint07272010
Enfgrowthcomplaint07272010Enfgrowthcomplaint07272010
Enfgrowthcomplaint07272010Finance Magnates
 

What's hot (11)

By law banking
By law bankingBy law banking
By law banking
 
Fair Credit Reporting Act
Fair Credit Reporting Act Fair Credit Reporting Act
Fair Credit Reporting Act
 
Bankruptcy-Unit4A-EV
Bankruptcy-Unit4A-EVBankruptcy-Unit4A-EV
Bankruptcy-Unit4A-EV
 
MINING INDUSTRY: A critical analysis through application of Rule 12(10) of MC...
MINING INDUSTRY: A critical analysis through application of Rule 12(10) of MC...MINING INDUSTRY: A critical analysis through application of Rule 12(10) of MC...
MINING INDUSTRY: A critical analysis through application of Rule 12(10) of MC...
 
10000001206
1000000120610000001206
10000001206
 
10000001203
1000000120310000001203
10000001203
 
State of wash case mandatory arbitration clause in an insurance contract wa...
State of wash case   mandatory arbitration clause in an insurance contract wa...State of wash case   mandatory arbitration clause in an insurance contract wa...
State of wash case mandatory arbitration clause in an insurance contract wa...
 
re22DocumentRegistrationAgreement
re22DocumentRegistrationAgreementre22DocumentRegistrationAgreement
re22DocumentRegistrationAgreement
 
HIPAA Security Rule consent agreement with OCR
HIPAA Security Rule consent agreement with OCRHIPAA Security Rule consent agreement with OCR
HIPAA Security Rule consent agreement with OCR
 
Enfgrowthcomplaint07272010
Enfgrowthcomplaint07272010Enfgrowthcomplaint07272010
Enfgrowthcomplaint07272010
 
deed_of_trust-983170-321522-193058
deed_of_trust-983170-321522-193058deed_of_trust-983170-321522-193058
deed_of_trust-983170-321522-193058
 

Similar to ea2008-027

Banker customer relationship
Banker customer relationshipBanker customer relationship
Banker customer relationshipShruti Singh
 
Case review: FAR EASTERN BANK V. BEE HONG FINANCE LTD [1971] 2 MLJ 6
Case review: FAR EASTERN BANK V. BEE HONG FINANCE LTD [1971] 2 MLJ 6Case review: FAR EASTERN BANK V. BEE HONG FINANCE LTD [1971] 2 MLJ 6
Case review: FAR EASTERN BANK V. BEE HONG FINANCE LTD [1971] 2 MLJ 6Zuhaira Nadiah
 
Securities and Exchange Commission Cease & Desist Order Against KBR, Inc.
Securities and Exchange Commission Cease & Desist Order Against KBR, Inc.Securities and Exchange Commission Cease & Desist Order Against KBR, Inc.
Securities and Exchange Commission Cease & Desist Order Against KBR, Inc.Workplace Investigations Group
 
FDCPA - Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
FDCPA - Fair Debt Collection Practices ActFDCPA - Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
FDCPA - Fair Debt Collection Practices ActYour Collection Rights
 
FDCPA - Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
FDCPA - Fair Debt Collection Practices ActFDCPA - Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
FDCPA - Fair Debt Collection Practices ActYour Collection Rights
 
Prepaid Card Compliance Master Class C (052311)
Prepaid Card Compliance Master Class   C (052311)Prepaid Card Compliance Master Class   C (052311)
Prepaid Card Compliance Master Class C (052311)Rachel Hamilton
 
Rapid Rescore Compliance Infractions
Rapid Rescore Compliance InfractionsRapid Rescore Compliance Infractions
Rapid Rescore Compliance InfractionsNAMBLive
 
Bank and custoemer_relation_new
Bank and custoemer_relation_newBank and custoemer_relation_new
Bank and custoemer_relation_newSheham Aliyar
 
Know Your Customer - Tips and Tricks
Know Your Customer - Tips and TricksKnow Your Customer - Tips and Tricks
Know Your Customer - Tips and TricksIdentityMind
 
Fair Debt Collection Practices Act - Protecting Consumer Rights
Fair Debt Collection Practices Act - Protecting Consumer RightsFair Debt Collection Practices Act - Protecting Consumer Rights
Fair Debt Collection Practices Act - Protecting Consumer RightsSmithMarco, P.C.
 
Banking offence and punishment act
Banking offence and punishment actBanking offence and punishment act
Banking offence and punishment actKusum901
 
Banking Law - Conclusive Evidence Clause in Malaysia
Banking Law - Conclusive Evidence Clause in MalaysiaBanking Law - Conclusive Evidence Clause in Malaysia
Banking Law - Conclusive Evidence Clause in MalaysiaAzri Nadiah
 
Complaint American Bar Association V. Federal Trade Commission
Complaint   American Bar Association V. Federal Trade CommissionComplaint   American Bar Association V. Federal Trade Commission
Complaint American Bar Association V. Federal Trade Commissionlawjack
 
Final_Hamilton-International-Reserve-Bank-Customer-Account-September_3_25_202...
Final_Hamilton-International-Reserve-Bank-Customer-Account-September_3_25_202...Final_Hamilton-International-Reserve-Bank-Customer-Account-September_3_25_202...
Final_Hamilton-International-Reserve-Bank-Customer-Account-September_3_25_202...HRBExposed
 
Cir 39 2016 TT NHNN.pdf
Cir 39 2016 TT NHNN.pdfCir 39 2016 TT NHNN.pdf
Cir 39 2016 TT NHNN.pdfThoPhng1470
 
Chapter 34 – Checks and Electronic Transfers
Chapter 34 – Checks and Electronic TransfersChapter 34 – Checks and Electronic Transfers
Chapter 34 – Checks and Electronic TransfersUAF_BA330
 
Paying banker and collecting banker
Paying banker and collecting bankerPaying banker and collecting banker
Paying banker and collecting bankerMohanM97
 

Similar to ea2008-027 (20)

Banker customer relationship
Banker customer relationshipBanker customer relationship
Banker customer relationship
 
Walden final
Walden   finalWalden   final
Walden final
 
What's Hot with payment by check
What's Hot with payment by checkWhat's Hot with payment by check
What's Hot with payment by check
 
Case review: FAR EASTERN BANK V. BEE HONG FINANCE LTD [1971] 2 MLJ 6
Case review: FAR EASTERN BANK V. BEE HONG FINANCE LTD [1971] 2 MLJ 6Case review: FAR EASTERN BANK V. BEE HONG FINANCE LTD [1971] 2 MLJ 6
Case review: FAR EASTERN BANK V. BEE HONG FINANCE LTD [1971] 2 MLJ 6
 
Securities and Exchange Commission Cease & Desist Order Against KBR, Inc.
Securities and Exchange Commission Cease & Desist Order Against KBR, Inc.Securities and Exchange Commission Cease & Desist Order Against KBR, Inc.
Securities and Exchange Commission Cease & Desist Order Against KBR, Inc.
 
FDCPA - Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
FDCPA - Fair Debt Collection Practices ActFDCPA - Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
FDCPA - Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
 
FDCPA - Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
FDCPA - Fair Debt Collection Practices ActFDCPA - Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
FDCPA - Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
 
Prepaid Card Compliance Master Class C (052311)
Prepaid Card Compliance Master Class   C (052311)Prepaid Card Compliance Master Class   C (052311)
Prepaid Card Compliance Master Class C (052311)
 
Letter of credit report
Letter of credit reportLetter of credit report
Letter of credit report
 
Rapid Rescore Compliance Infractions
Rapid Rescore Compliance InfractionsRapid Rescore Compliance Infractions
Rapid Rescore Compliance Infractions
 
Bank and custoemer_relation_new
Bank and custoemer_relation_newBank and custoemer_relation_new
Bank and custoemer_relation_new
 
Know Your Customer - Tips and Tricks
Know Your Customer - Tips and TricksKnow Your Customer - Tips and Tricks
Know Your Customer - Tips and Tricks
 
Fair Debt Collection Practices Act - Protecting Consumer Rights
Fair Debt Collection Practices Act - Protecting Consumer RightsFair Debt Collection Practices Act - Protecting Consumer Rights
Fair Debt Collection Practices Act - Protecting Consumer Rights
 
Banking offence and punishment act
Banking offence and punishment actBanking offence and punishment act
Banking offence and punishment act
 
Banking Law - Conclusive Evidence Clause in Malaysia
Banking Law - Conclusive Evidence Clause in MalaysiaBanking Law - Conclusive Evidence Clause in Malaysia
Banking Law - Conclusive Evidence Clause in Malaysia
 
Complaint American Bar Association V. Federal Trade Commission
Complaint   American Bar Association V. Federal Trade CommissionComplaint   American Bar Association V. Federal Trade Commission
Complaint American Bar Association V. Federal Trade Commission
 
Final_Hamilton-International-Reserve-Bank-Customer-Account-September_3_25_202...
Final_Hamilton-International-Reserve-Bank-Customer-Account-September_3_25_202...Final_Hamilton-International-Reserve-Bank-Customer-Account-September_3_25_202...
Final_Hamilton-International-Reserve-Bank-Customer-Account-September_3_25_202...
 
Cir 39 2016 TT NHNN.pdf
Cir 39 2016 TT NHNN.pdfCir 39 2016 TT NHNN.pdf
Cir 39 2016 TT NHNN.pdf
 
Chapter 34 – Checks and Electronic Transfers
Chapter 34 – Checks and Electronic TransfersChapter 34 – Checks and Electronic Transfers
Chapter 34 – Checks and Electronic Transfers
 
Paying banker and collecting banker
Paying banker and collecting bankerPaying banker and collecting banker
Paying banker and collecting banker
 

More from Liana Prieto

Hargraves v Capital City Mortg Corp
Hargraves v Capital City Mortg CorpHargraves v Capital City Mortg Corp
Hargraves v Capital City Mortg CorpLiana Prieto
 
Herero Peoples Reparations Corp v Deutsche Bank AG
Herero Peoples Reparations Corp v Deutsche Bank AGHerero Peoples Reparations Corp v Deutsche Bank AG
Herero Peoples Reparations Corp v Deutsche Bank AGLiana Prieto
 
313201253116253830420
313201253116253830420313201253116253830420
313201253116253830420Liana Prieto
 
United Western Bank v Office of Thrift Supervision-1
United Western Bank v Office of Thrift Supervision-1United Western Bank v Office of Thrift Supervision-1
United Western Bank v Office of Thrift Supervision-1Liana Prieto
 
Advanta Bank v FDIC
Advanta Bank v FDICAdvanta Bank v FDIC
Advanta Bank v FDICLiana Prieto
 

More from Liana Prieto (8)

Hargraves v Capital City Mortg Corp
Hargraves v Capital City Mortg CorpHargraves v Capital City Mortg Corp
Hargraves v Capital City Mortg Corp
 
Herero Peoples Reparations Corp v Deutsche Bank AG
Herero Peoples Reparations Corp v Deutsche Bank AGHerero Peoples Reparations Corp v Deutsche Bank AG
Herero Peoples Reparations Corp v Deutsche Bank AG
 
Mwani v bin Laden
Mwani v bin LadenMwani v bin Laden
Mwani v bin Laden
 
luthersettle-1
luthersettle-1luthersettle-1
luthersettle-1
 
313201253116253830420
313201253116253830420313201253116253830420
313201253116253830420
 
United Western Bank v Office of Thrift Supervision-1
United Western Bank v Office of Thrift Supervision-1United Western Bank v Office of Thrift Supervision-1
United Western Bank v Office of Thrift Supervision-1
 
ea2008-027
ea2008-027ea2008-027
ea2008-027
 
Advanta Bank v FDIC
Advanta Bank v FDICAdvanta Bank v FDIC
Advanta Bank v FDIC
 

ea2008-027

  • 1. #2008-027 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY In the Matter of: ) Wachovia Bank, National Association ) AA-EC-08-13 Charlotte, North Carolina ) CONSENT ORDER FOR A CIVIL MONEY PENALTY The Comptroller of the Currency of the United States of America (“Comptroller”), through his National Bank Examiner, has examined the affairs of Wachovia Bank, National Association, Charlotte, North Carolina (“Bank”). The Bank, by and through its duly elected and acting Board of Directors (“Board”), has executed a “Stipulation and Consent to the Issuance of a Consent Order for a Civil Money Penalty,” dated April 24, 2008, that is accepted by the Comptroller. By this Stipulation and Consent, which is incorporated by reference, the Bank has consented to the issuance of this Consent Order for a Civil Money Penalty (“Order”) by the Comptroller. The Bank, by and through its Board, has also executed an Agreement By and Between the Bank and the Comptroller, dated April 24, 2008. ARTICLE I COMPTROLLER’S FINDINGS The Comptroller finds, and the Bank neither admits nor denies, without any adjudication on the merits, the following: (1) From on or about June 1, 2003, until on or about December 31, 2006, the Bank maintained account relationships with certain payment processors for telemarketers, and direct telemarketers, including Payment Processing Center, LLC (“PPC”), FTN Promotions, Inc. dba
  • 2. Suntasia, Inc. (“Suntasia”), Netchex Corp., Your Money Access LLC (“Netchex/YMA”), and related companies (collectively, “the payment processors and direct telemarketers”). (2) As part of their business activities, the payment processors and direct telemarketers regularly deposited large numbers of remotely created checks (“RCCs”) in their accounts at the Bank. (3) A substantial number of the RCCs deposited by the payment processors and direct telemarketers were returned to the Bank by or on behalf of consumers whose bank account information appeared on the RCCs for a number of reasons, including that consumers had not authorized the RCCs or that consumers did not receive adequate consideration in the transaction. (4) Consumers were harmed in connection with the payment processors’ and direct telemarketers’ relationships with the Bank. (5) In connection with its handling of the account activities of the payment processors and direct telemarketers, the Bank engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, including, but not limited to: (a) failure to conduct suitable due diligence on the accounts even though the Bank had reason to know that the payment processors and direct telemarketers were high-risk customers that posed significant legal, reputational and monetary risks to the Bank and monetary risk to consumers; (b) failure to recognize and properly address the risks posed by the activities of the payment processors and direct telemarketers; 2
  • 3. (c) failure to monitor the rates of return on the RCCs deposited into the accounts and to respond to allegations of consumer fraud from other banks and consumers; and (d) failure to follow the Bank’s normal procedures for handling returned RCCs and implementation of a policy that had the effect of minimizing consumer complaints and scrutiny of the Bank’s relationships with the payment processors and direct telemarketers. (6) In connection with its handling of the account activities of the payment processors and direct telemarketers, the Bank engaged in unfair practices in violation of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. Section 45(a)(1). (7) The Bank’s handling of the account activities of the payment processors and direct telemarketers was part of a pattern of misconduct that resulted in financial gain to the Bank in the form of fee income from the payment processors and direct telemarketers on returned RCCs, and a pattern or practice of disregard of the interests of consumers involved in transactions with the payment processors and direct telemarketers. ARTICLE II ORDER FOR A CIVIL MONEY PENALTY (1) Without admitting or denying any wrongdoing, the Bank hereby consents to the payment of a civil money penalty in the amount of ten million dollars ($10,000,000), which shall be paid upon execution of this Order. (a) If a check is the selected method of payment, the check shall be made payable to the Treasurer of the United States and shall be delivered to: 3
  • 4. Comptroller of the Currency, P.O. Box 979012, St. Louis, Missouri 63197-9000. (b) If a wire transfer is the selected method of payment, it must be sent to the Comptroller’s account #XXXXXXX, ABA Routing # XXXXXXX. (c) A photocopy of the payment document or confirmation of the wire transfer shall be sent immediately, by overnight delivery, to the Director of Enforcement and Compliance, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 250 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20219. (2) This Order shall be enforceable to the same extent and in the same manner as an effective and outstanding order that has been issued and has become final pursuant to 12 U.S.C. §§ 1818(h) and (i) (as amended). ARTICLE III CLOSING (1) It is expressly and clearly understood that if, at any time, the Comptroller deems it appropriate in fulfilling the responsibilities placed upon him by the several laws of the United States of America to undertake any action affecting the Bank, nothing in this Order shall in any way inhibit, estop, bar or otherwise prevent the Comptroller from so doing. (2) This Order is intended to be, and shall be construed to be, a final order issued pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 1818(i)(2), and expressly does not form, and may not be construed to form, a contract binding on the Comptroller or the United States. (3) The terms of this Order, including this paragraph, are not subject to amendment or modification by any extraneous expression, prior agreements or prior arrangements between the parties, whether oral or written. 4
  • 5. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 24th day of April 2008. /s/ Delora Ng Jee Delora Ng Jee Deputy Comptroller Large Bank Supervision 5
  • 6. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY In the Matter of: ) Wachovia Bank, National Association ) AA-EC-08-13 Charlotte, North Carolina ) STIPULATION AND CONSENT TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CONSENT ORDER FOR A CIVIL MONEY PENALTY The Comptroller of the Currency of the United States of America (“Comptroller”) intends to initiate a civil money penalty proceeding against Wachovia Bank, National Association, Charlotte, North Carolina (“Bank”) pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 1818(i) for unsafe and unsound banking practices and violations of law relating to the Bank’s banking relationships with certain third party payment processors for telemarketers, and direct telemarketers. The Bank, in the interest of compliance and cooperation, consents to the issuance of a Consent Order for a Civil Money Penalty, dated April 24, 2008 (“Order”); In consideration of the above premises, the Comptroller, through his authorized representative, and the Bank, through its duly elected and acting Board of Directors, hereby stipulate and agree to the following: ARTICLE I Jurisdiction (1) The Bank is a national banking association chartered and examined by the Comptroller pursuant to the National Bank Act of 1864, as amended, 12 U.S.C. § 1 et seq. (2) The Comptroller is “the appropriate Federal banking agency” regarding the Bank pursuant to 12 U.S.C. §§ 1813(q) and 1818(i). - 1 -
  • 7. (3) The Bank is an “insured depository institution” within the meaning of 12 U.S.C. § 1818(i). ARTICLE II Agreement (1) The Bank, without admitting or denying any wrongdoing, hereby consents and agrees to the issuance of the Order by the Comptroller. (2) The Bank further agrees that said Order shall be deemed an “order issued with the consent of the depository institution” as defined in 12 U.S.C. § 1818(h)(2), and consents and agrees that said Order shall become effective upon its issuance and shall be fully enforceable by the Comptroller under the provisions of 12 U.S.C. § 1818(i). Notwithstanding the absence of mutuality of obligation, or of consideration, or of a contract, the Comptroller may enforce any of the commitments or obligations herein undertaken by the Bank under his supervisory powers, including 12 U.S.C. § 1818(i), and not as a matter of contract law. The Bank expressly acknowledges that neither the Bank nor the Comptroller has any intention to enter into a contract. (3) The Bank also expressly acknowledges that no officer or employee of the Comptroller has statutory or other authority to bind the United States, the U.S. Treasury Department, the Comptroller, or any other federal bank regulatory agency or entity, or any officer or employee of any of those entities to a contract affecting the Comptroller’s exercise of his supervisory responsibilities. - 2 -
  • 8. ARTICLE III Waivers (1) The Bank, by signing this Stipulation and Consent, hereby waives: (a) the issuance of a Notice of Charges pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 1818(b); (b) all rights to a hearing and a final agency decision pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 1818(i), 12 C.F.R. Part 19 (c) all rights to seek any type of administrative or judicial review of the Order; (d) any and all rights to challenge or contest the validity of the Order; and (e) any and all claims for fees, costs or expenses against the Comptroller, or any of its agents or employees, related in any way to this enforcement matter or this Order, whether arising under common law or under the terms of any statute, including, but not limited to, the Equal Access to Justice Act, 5 U.S.C. § 504 and 28 U.S.C. § 2412. ARTICLE IV Other Action (1) The Bank agrees that the provisions of this Stipulation and Consent shall not inhibit, estop, bar, or otherwise prevent the Comptroller from taking any other action affecting the Bank if, at any time, it deems it appropriate to do so to fulfill the responsibilities placed upon it by the several laws of the United States of America. - 3 -
  • 9. (2) The Bank understands that nothing herein shall preclude any proceedings brought by the Comptroller to enforce the terms of this Order, and that nothing herein constitutes, nor shall the Bank contend that it constitutes, a waiver of any right, power, or authority of any other representatives of the United States or agencies thereof, including the Department of Justice, to bring other actions deemed appropriate. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the undersigned, authorized by the Comptroller as his representative, has hereunto set her hand on behalf of the Comptroller. /s/ Delora Ng Jee 04/24/2008 Delora Ng Jee Date Deputy Comptroller Large Bank Supervision IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the undersigned, as the duly elected and acting Board of Directors of the Bank, have hereunto set their hands on behalf of the Bank. G. Kennedy Thompson /S/ Mark C. Treanor /S/ Benjamin P. Jenkins III /S/ Stanhope A. Kelly /S/ Date 04/24/08 Date 04/24/08 Date 04/24/08 Date 04/24/08 Donald K. Truslow /S/ Thomas J. Wurtz /S/ Date 04/24/08 Date 04/24/08 - 4 -