SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 1
Download to read offline
ASTOCKAMP
Stockamp & Associates, Inc. (Stockamp)
Revenue Cycle Solution at (Hospital)
Foliow-Up Quality Review Form
& associates
Representative: LaTonya Broadus
Reviewed by: Leticia
Account Number
Patient Name
HIS Updated .07 .07 .06
Account in Correct Phase
Account in Correct Insurance Coverage
Appropriate Rebill/Claim Force
Correct Action Taken (half points possible)
Self Pay/Patient Involvement .40
Additional Documentation Required.30
Appeals Handled Appropriately.30
Correct Transfers (if applicable).30
Account Resolved .30
Elevated if Necessary .40
Documentation Standards Met
Claim/Account Status .10
Action Taken .10
Contact Name and Number .15
Payment Information.15
Tickle Timeframe
Activity Code
Overall Evaluation (of possible 3.0)
Comments:
l)Good Note
Review Date:
Accounts From:
7/1/2014
7/11/2014
1 2 3 ... 4 5
205725630 205063103 204838759 205666351 205682778
Flavin Adam Dickinson Brown Burke
0
0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.13
2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20
0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10
3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.93
2) Good Note
3) Good Note
4) notes 07/8/14 great
5)not a corrected claim
Overall Evaluation
Meets or Exceeds Expectations (3.0-2.8)
Requires Minor Improvement (2.79 - 2.5)
Requires Major Improvement (2.49 - 0)
Representative:
Overall Score
h«. j(j
*-
L 2.99 ] Reviewer:
(Average of 5 Scores)
LG
CONFIDENTIAL
© 1995-2008, Stockamp & Associates, Inc. (Stockamp)
PLEASE SEE LIMITATIONS AND RESTRICTIONS
DESCRIBED ON THE LEGAL NOTICE PAGE OF THIS DOCUMENT
PROPRIETARY
Page 1 of 1
CCMC Follow-up QR Form 2011 ()
Last Printed: 7/31/2014 2:07 PM

More Related Content

Similar to 2014 gradecard.PDF

ratio analysis
ratio analysisratio analysis
ratio analysis
goyal_p123
 
Problem 1 (20 pts) Assume the two op amps are ideal.(a) W.docx
Problem 1 (20 pts) Assume the two op amps are ideal.(a) W.docxProblem 1 (20 pts) Assume the two op amps are ideal.(a) W.docx
Problem 1 (20 pts) Assume the two op amps are ideal.(a) W.docx
stilliegeorgiana
 
Version 1 Student ID Number Module C.docx
Version 1         Student ID Number Module C.docxVersion 1         Student ID Number Module C.docx
Version 1 Student ID Number Module C.docx
durantheseldine
 

Similar to 2014 gradecard.PDF (6)

Acct 400 final exam answers
Acct 400 final exam answersAcct 400 final exam answers
Acct 400 final exam answers
 
Acct 400 final exam answers
Acct 400 final exam answersAcct 400 final exam answers
Acct 400 final exam answers
 
Acct 400 final exam answers
Acct 400 final exam answersAcct 400 final exam answers
Acct 400 final exam answers
 
ratio analysis
ratio analysisratio analysis
ratio analysis
 
Problem 1 (20 pts) Assume the two op amps are ideal.(a) W.docx
Problem 1 (20 pts) Assume the two op amps are ideal.(a) W.docxProblem 1 (20 pts) Assume the two op amps are ideal.(a) W.docx
Problem 1 (20 pts) Assume the two op amps are ideal.(a) W.docx
 
Version 1 Student ID Number Module C.docx
Version 1         Student ID Number Module C.docxVersion 1         Student ID Number Module C.docx
Version 1 Student ID Number Module C.docx
 

2014 gradecard.PDF

  • 1. ASTOCKAMP Stockamp & Associates, Inc. (Stockamp) Revenue Cycle Solution at (Hospital) Foliow-Up Quality Review Form & associates Representative: LaTonya Broadus Reviewed by: Leticia Account Number Patient Name HIS Updated .07 .07 .06 Account in Correct Phase Account in Correct Insurance Coverage Appropriate Rebill/Claim Force Correct Action Taken (half points possible) Self Pay/Patient Involvement .40 Additional Documentation Required.30 Appeals Handled Appropriately.30 Correct Transfers (if applicable).30 Account Resolved .30 Elevated if Necessary .40 Documentation Standards Met Claim/Account Status .10 Action Taken .10 Contact Name and Number .15 Payment Information.15 Tickle Timeframe Activity Code Overall Evaluation (of possible 3.0) Comments: l)Good Note Review Date: Accounts From: 7/1/2014 7/11/2014 1 2 3 ... 4 5 205725630 205063103 204838759 205666351 205682778 Flavin Adam Dickinson Brown Burke 0 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.13 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 3.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 2.93 2) Good Note 3) Good Note 4) notes 07/8/14 great 5)not a corrected claim Overall Evaluation Meets or Exceeds Expectations (3.0-2.8) Requires Minor Improvement (2.79 - 2.5) Requires Major Improvement (2.49 - 0) Representative: Overall Score h«. j(j *- L 2.99 ] Reviewer: (Average of 5 Scores) LG CONFIDENTIAL © 1995-2008, Stockamp & Associates, Inc. (Stockamp) PLEASE SEE LIMITATIONS AND RESTRICTIONS DESCRIBED ON THE LEGAL NOTICE PAGE OF THIS DOCUMENT PROPRIETARY Page 1 of 1 CCMC Follow-up QR Form 2011 () Last Printed: 7/31/2014 2:07 PM