SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 3
Download to read offline
http://solutions-network.org/site-htsi/
Human Trafficking Data Standards
A basis from which to build better numbers on human trafficking
The Problem
Q: “How many victims are we talking about, just here in the US?”
A: “Somewhere between 1,400 and 2.2 million.”
The estimated number of humans trafficked in the United States alone
varies by more than an order of magnitude. In any industry, achieving a
measure of effectiveness within such a wide range would be impossible.
Under such circumstances, sound policy decision-making gives way to
emotional responses lacking fact-based evidence, funding requests to
prevent trafficking and provide victim care appear dubious, and resources
and efforts are easily misused when adequate measures of the problem
remain so vague.
Exhibit A: In 2000, activists estimated that 50,000 victims of forced labor and prostitution were
trafficked into the United States every year. President Bush then authorized 42 Justice Department
task forces and spent more than $150 million to find and help the estimated hundreds of thousands of
victims. Between 2000 to 2007, they identified exactly 1,362 victims and filed fewer than 15 federal
cases against traffickers.
Exhibit B: After 10 years of publishing the annual Trafficking in Persons Report, the U.S. Department of
State acknowledges that every figure in every chart pertaining to victims and cases of trafficking on
every continent are “estimates only, given the lack of uniformity in national reporting structures.”
The reasons behind the lack of quality data are real and challenging, including: security concerns,
bendable and misunderstood definitions, mixed criminal elements, gray areas especially within labor
trafficking definitions, lack of harmony among existing data sources, over and undercounting of
participants, and simple unwillingness to share data. These challenges have been documented since
2002, and yet, the problem remains largely the same in 2015.
The Envisioned Solution
Clear data standards and standardized security protocols are the beginning of a solution - a
groundwork that can help deliver better numbers and efficient continuity of care for survivors. Affected
sectors and likely stakeholders include:
❏ agencies in the chain of care
❏ funding organizations interested in accurate reporting
❏ technology providers (e.g. IBM, Oracle, EMC) interested in security and transmission of data
❏ industries (e.g. mining, cocoa, shipping, fishing) wanting to eradicate nefarious acts in their
logistics path
the numbers on trafficking
HTSI: the numbers on trafficking : http://solutions-network.org/site-htsi/
A standard:
❏ uses definitions to lessen confusion
❏ has well-defined sets of structured data (specific labels, names and values)
❏ can be the backbone for cooperation
❏ can be used to derive meaningful statistics
❏ is constantly reviewed for applicability and efficacy, can be pruned or expanded
❏ can be the basis for auditing agencies’ processes, both internally and externally
Some relevant historical examples of both international and private standards:
802.11 Internet Protocol
After 9 years of negotiation, the 802.11
committee finally agreed on definitions
and drew up a standard acceptable to
75% of the committee members. Now,
this standard enjoys global adoption
by all companies wishing to support
the seamless transfer of data,
wirelessly.
Healthcare HL7 (CCD)
The Consolidation Project team analyzed
and compiled several competing forms and
tools, finally creating a fully compliant CCD
document, then layering in the additional
HITSP, IHE and Stage 1 Meaningful Use
constraints. It provides a means for one
healthcare practitioner, system, or setting
to aggregate all of the pertinent data about
a patient and forward it to another user to
support the continuity of care.
CARFAX
In 1984, Edwin Barnett III started
selling CARFAX reports based on
10,000 vehicle records he obtained. To
grow, Barnett knew his company would
need far greater access to vehicle
records. In nine years' time, CARFAX
was receiving automobile records from
all 50 states. Within 20 years, 3 billion
records were generated by dealers
and shops feeding standardized data
into the system.
The Project and Deliverables
Resolve/HTSI envision a three-phase project to develop and solidify data standards, standardized
security protocols, and form an independent Standards Committee.
Phase One Phase Two Phase Three
1. Preliminary Standard to be
Prototyped
2. Preliminary Standards
Committee Formed
3. Results of Prototype Data
Transfer between Agencies
Available
1. Results of Data Transfer
between Agencies
2. Refined Standard
3. Stable Standards
Committee
4. Better numbers achievable
in testing areas
1. Widespread Global Adoption
in public and private sectors
2. Robust Standards Committee
3. Ongoing Evangelization
4. Better global numbers
achievable
Months 1-8 Months 9-33 Month 34 onward
HTSI: the numbers on trafficking : http://solutions-network.org/site-htsi/
Phase One (months 1 - 8)
➔ Observation of how data is used between agencies at least 12 agencies (4 agencies in 3
countries), uncovering points of agreement and negotiation. On-the-ground observation
identifies and assesses how data is captured and read in each participating agency, identifies a
minimum set of data, finds sets of values that make sense, and determines what data creates
the most understanding and least confusion.
➔ Develop alliances with the public sector, research and think tanks, commercial tech firms and
other stakeholders (e.g. funders, advocates).
➔ Normalize data for preliminary standard to include common attributes, minimum sets, and
boundary conditions.
➔ Develop preliminary Standards Committee that will eventually mature to independence over
the course of the project.
Phase Two (2 years / months 9 - 33)
➔ Refine and solidify Standards Committee, including bi-annual meetings, committee reporting,
and committee-lead monitoring and evaluation of preliminary standard.
➔ Expand research to include additional agencies to increase breadth and scope of input.
➔ Expand research with legacy agencies to hone definitions and troubleshoot protocols.
➔ Begin evangelizing the standards through conferences, stakeholders, and other forums.
Phase Three (5 years / months 34++)
➔ Standards Committee evangelizes the product globally.
➔ Standard is refined at an international context level.
➔ Standards Committee takes over 100% of product evolution.
➔ Standard becomes promoted as a basis for compliance in grant funding.

More Related Content

What's hot

Data ethics and machine learning: discrimination, algorithmic bias, and how t...
Data ethics and machine learning: discrimination, algorithmic bias, and how t...Data ethics and machine learning: discrimination, algorithmic bias, and how t...
Data ethics and machine learning: discrimination, algorithmic bias, and how t...Data Driven Innovation
 
e-SIDES presentation at Leiden University 21/09/2017
e-SIDES presentation at Leiden University 21/09/2017e-SIDES presentation at Leiden University 21/09/2017
e-SIDES presentation at Leiden University 21/09/2017e-SIDES.eu
 
Cyberspace and Digital Diplomacy
Cyberspace and Digital DiplomacyCyberspace and Digital Diplomacy
Cyberspace and Digital DiplomacyKenny Huang Ph.D.
 
#opendata Back to the future
#opendata Back to the future#opendata Back to the future
#opendata Back to the futureSlim Turki, Dr.
 
The role of statistical standards in building national data backbones
The role of statistical standards in building national data backbonesThe role of statistical standards in building national data backbones
The role of statistical standards in building national data backbonesJonathan Challener
 
Privacy policy information in data value chains
Privacy policy information in data value chainsPrivacy policy information in data value chains
Privacy policy information in data value chainsBig Data Value Association
 
U.S. Approach to Cybersecurity Governance
U.S. Approach to Cybersecurity GovernanceU.S. Approach to Cybersecurity Governance
U.S. Approach to Cybersecurity GovernanceGwanhoo Lee
 
Information Governance: accentuating the positive, eliminating the negative
Information Governance: accentuating the positive, eliminating the negativeInformation Governance: accentuating the positive, eliminating the negative
Information Governance: accentuating the positive, eliminating the negativeHeather Jack
 
ODDC Context - Opening the Cities: Open Government Data in Local Governments ...
ODDC Context - Opening the Cities: Open Government Data in Local Governments ...ODDC Context - Opening the Cities: Open Government Data in Local Governments ...
ODDC Context - Opening the Cities: Open Government Data in Local Governments ...Open Data Research Network
 

What's hot (13)

Data ethics and machine learning: discrimination, algorithmic bias, and how t...
Data ethics and machine learning: discrimination, algorithmic bias, and how t...Data ethics and machine learning: discrimination, algorithmic bias, and how t...
Data ethics and machine learning: discrimination, algorithmic bias, and how t...
 
e-SIDES presentation at Leiden University 21/09/2017
e-SIDES presentation at Leiden University 21/09/2017e-SIDES presentation at Leiden University 21/09/2017
e-SIDES presentation at Leiden University 21/09/2017
 
Cyberspace and Digital Diplomacy
Cyberspace and Digital DiplomacyCyberspace and Digital Diplomacy
Cyberspace and Digital Diplomacy
 
#opendata Back to the future
#opendata Back to the future#opendata Back to the future
#opendata Back to the future
 
The role of statistical standards in building national data backbones
The role of statistical standards in building national data backbonesThe role of statistical standards in building national data backbones
The role of statistical standards in building national data backbones
 
Privacy policy information in data value chains
Privacy policy information in data value chainsPrivacy policy information in data value chains
Privacy policy information in data value chains
 
Gr 2: Current Focus on Information Use
Gr 2: Current Focus on Information UseGr 2: Current Focus on Information Use
Gr 2: Current Focus on Information Use
 
Data context new developments for research the social sciences
 Data context new developments for research the social sciences Data context new developments for research the social sciences
Data context new developments for research the social sciences
 
U.S. Approach to Cybersecurity Governance
U.S. Approach to Cybersecurity GovernanceU.S. Approach to Cybersecurity Governance
U.S. Approach to Cybersecurity Governance
 
Data Portability and Interoperability – SWIRE – June 2021 OECD discussion
Data Portability and Interoperability – SWIRE – June 2021 OECD discussionData Portability and Interoperability – SWIRE – June 2021 OECD discussion
Data Portability and Interoperability – SWIRE – June 2021 OECD discussion
 
Satori WP1 slides
Satori WP1 slidesSatori WP1 slides
Satori WP1 slides
 
Information Governance: accentuating the positive, eliminating the negative
Information Governance: accentuating the positive, eliminating the negativeInformation Governance: accentuating the positive, eliminating the negative
Information Governance: accentuating the positive, eliminating the negative
 
ODDC Context - Opening the Cities: Open Government Data in Local Governments ...
ODDC Context - Opening the Cities: Open Government Data in Local Governments ...ODDC Context - Opening the Cities: Open Government Data in Local Governments ...
ODDC Context - Opening the Cities: Open Government Data in Local Governments ...
 

Similar to HTSI ExecutiveSummary_OCT2015_V5

Anonos FTC Comment Letter Big Data: A Tool for Inclusion or Exclusion
Anonos  FTC Comment Letter Big Data: A Tool for Inclusion or ExclusionAnonos  FTC Comment Letter Big Data: A Tool for Inclusion or Exclusion
Anonos FTC Comment Letter Big Data: A Tool for Inclusion or ExclusionTed Myerson
 
Global Evolution of Data Sharing
Global Evolution of Data SharingGlobal Evolution of Data Sharing
Global Evolution of Data SharingPERC
 
Brussels Privacy Hub: SATORI and iTRACK
Brussels Privacy Hub: SATORI and iTRACKBrussels Privacy Hub: SATORI and iTRACK
Brussels Privacy Hub: SATORI and iTRACKTrilateral Research
 
HIMSS seeks HIPAA Cybersecurity Framework clarifications from NIST
HIMSS seeks HIPAA Cybersecurity Framework clarifications from NISTHIMSS seeks HIPAA Cybersecurity Framework clarifications from NIST
HIMSS seeks HIPAA Cybersecurity Framework clarifications from NISTDavid Sweigert
 
Health care vertical open standards
Health care vertical open standardsHealth care vertical open standards
Health care vertical open standardsKumar
 
Data for development
Data for developmentData for development
Data for developmentIdowuLateef
 
Enhancing Capital Markets Transparency And Trust Davos 2010 L Wats...
Enhancing  Capital  Markets  Transparency And  Trust    Davos 2010    L  Wats...Enhancing  Capital  Markets  Transparency And  Trust    Davos 2010    L  Wats...
Enhancing Capital Markets Transparency And Trust Davos 2010 L Wats...Workiva
 
Implementing a Kenyan Credit Information Sharing System: Progress and Challe...
Implementing a Kenyan Credit Information Sharing System:  Progress and Challe...Implementing a Kenyan Credit Information Sharing System:  Progress and Challe...
Implementing a Kenyan Credit Information Sharing System: Progress and Challe...PERC
 

Similar to HTSI ExecutiveSummary_OCT2015_V5 (20)

Tim Midgley, Saferworld (UK )
Tim Midgley, Saferworld (UK )Tim Midgley, Saferworld (UK )
Tim Midgley, Saferworld (UK )
 
Anonos FTC Comment Letter Big Data: A Tool for Inclusion or Exclusion
Anonos  FTC Comment Letter Big Data: A Tool for Inclusion or ExclusionAnonos  FTC Comment Letter Big Data: A Tool for Inclusion or Exclusion
Anonos FTC Comment Letter Big Data: A Tool for Inclusion or Exclusion
 
COMMON GOOD DIGITAL FRAMEWORK
COMMON GOOD DIGITAL FRAMEWORKCOMMON GOOD DIGITAL FRAMEWORK
COMMON GOOD DIGITAL FRAMEWORK
 
Global Evolution of Data Sharing
Global Evolution of Data SharingGlobal Evolution of Data Sharing
Global Evolution of Data Sharing
 
Brussels Privacy Hub: SATORI and iTRACK
Brussels Privacy Hub: SATORI and iTRACKBrussels Privacy Hub: SATORI and iTRACK
Brussels Privacy Hub: SATORI and iTRACK
 
HIMSS seeks HIPAA Cybersecurity Framework clarifications from NIST
HIMSS seeks HIPAA Cybersecurity Framework clarifications from NISTHIMSS seeks HIPAA Cybersecurity Framework clarifications from NIST
HIMSS seeks HIPAA Cybersecurity Framework clarifications from NIST
 
Health care vertical open standards
Health care vertical open standardsHealth care vertical open standards
Health care vertical open standards
 
Innovations in Information Communication Technology
Innovations in Information Communication TechnologyInnovations in Information Communication Technology
Innovations in Information Communication Technology
 
Innovations in ICT
Innovations in ICTInnovations in ICT
Innovations in ICT
 
Innovations in Information Communication Technology
Innovations in Information Communication TechnologyInnovations in Information Communication Technology
Innovations in Information Communication Technology
 
Innovations in ICT
Innovations in ICTInnovations in ICT
Innovations in ICT
 
Data for development
Data for developmentData for development
Data for development
 
Data breaches at home and abroad
Data breaches at home and abroad Data breaches at home and abroad
Data breaches at home and abroad
 
Rasmussen Prince Mahidol 28 Jan 10
Rasmussen Prince Mahidol 28 Jan 10Rasmussen Prince Mahidol 28 Jan 10
Rasmussen Prince Mahidol 28 Jan 10
 
Haiti, Rasmussen, InSTEDD, Bangkok, 28 Jan 10
Haiti, Rasmussen, InSTEDD, Bangkok, 28 Jan 10Haiti, Rasmussen, InSTEDD, Bangkok, 28 Jan 10
Haiti, Rasmussen, InSTEDD, Bangkok, 28 Jan 10
 
Haiti, Rasmussen, InSTEDD, Bangkok, Jan 2010
Haiti, Rasmussen, InSTEDD, Bangkok, Jan 2010Haiti, Rasmussen, InSTEDD, Bangkok, Jan 2010
Haiti, Rasmussen, InSTEDD, Bangkok, Jan 2010
 
Enhancing Capital Markets Transparency And Trust Davos 2010 L Wats...
Enhancing  Capital  Markets  Transparency And  Trust    Davos 2010    L  Wats...Enhancing  Capital  Markets  Transparency And  Trust    Davos 2010    L  Wats...
Enhancing Capital Markets Transparency And Trust Davos 2010 L Wats...
 
IM seminor.pptx
IM seminor.pptxIM seminor.pptx
IM seminor.pptx
 
Blockchain in Global Supply Chains
Blockchain in Global Supply ChainsBlockchain in Global Supply Chains
Blockchain in Global Supply Chains
 
Implementing a Kenyan Credit Information Sharing System: Progress and Challe...
Implementing a Kenyan Credit Information Sharing System:  Progress and Challe...Implementing a Kenyan Credit Information Sharing System:  Progress and Challe...
Implementing a Kenyan Credit Information Sharing System: Progress and Challe...
 

HTSI ExecutiveSummary_OCT2015_V5

  • 1. http://solutions-network.org/site-htsi/ Human Trafficking Data Standards A basis from which to build better numbers on human trafficking The Problem Q: “How many victims are we talking about, just here in the US?” A: “Somewhere between 1,400 and 2.2 million.” The estimated number of humans trafficked in the United States alone varies by more than an order of magnitude. In any industry, achieving a measure of effectiveness within such a wide range would be impossible. Under such circumstances, sound policy decision-making gives way to emotional responses lacking fact-based evidence, funding requests to prevent trafficking and provide victim care appear dubious, and resources and efforts are easily misused when adequate measures of the problem remain so vague. Exhibit A: In 2000, activists estimated that 50,000 victims of forced labor and prostitution were trafficked into the United States every year. President Bush then authorized 42 Justice Department task forces and spent more than $150 million to find and help the estimated hundreds of thousands of victims. Between 2000 to 2007, they identified exactly 1,362 victims and filed fewer than 15 federal cases against traffickers. Exhibit B: After 10 years of publishing the annual Trafficking in Persons Report, the U.S. Department of State acknowledges that every figure in every chart pertaining to victims and cases of trafficking on every continent are “estimates only, given the lack of uniformity in national reporting structures.” The reasons behind the lack of quality data are real and challenging, including: security concerns, bendable and misunderstood definitions, mixed criminal elements, gray areas especially within labor trafficking definitions, lack of harmony among existing data sources, over and undercounting of participants, and simple unwillingness to share data. These challenges have been documented since 2002, and yet, the problem remains largely the same in 2015. The Envisioned Solution Clear data standards and standardized security protocols are the beginning of a solution - a groundwork that can help deliver better numbers and efficient continuity of care for survivors. Affected sectors and likely stakeholders include: ❏ agencies in the chain of care ❏ funding organizations interested in accurate reporting ❏ technology providers (e.g. IBM, Oracle, EMC) interested in security and transmission of data ❏ industries (e.g. mining, cocoa, shipping, fishing) wanting to eradicate nefarious acts in their logistics path the numbers on trafficking
  • 2. HTSI: the numbers on trafficking : http://solutions-network.org/site-htsi/ A standard: ❏ uses definitions to lessen confusion ❏ has well-defined sets of structured data (specific labels, names and values) ❏ can be the backbone for cooperation ❏ can be used to derive meaningful statistics ❏ is constantly reviewed for applicability and efficacy, can be pruned or expanded ❏ can be the basis for auditing agencies’ processes, both internally and externally Some relevant historical examples of both international and private standards: 802.11 Internet Protocol After 9 years of negotiation, the 802.11 committee finally agreed on definitions and drew up a standard acceptable to 75% of the committee members. Now, this standard enjoys global adoption by all companies wishing to support the seamless transfer of data, wirelessly. Healthcare HL7 (CCD) The Consolidation Project team analyzed and compiled several competing forms and tools, finally creating a fully compliant CCD document, then layering in the additional HITSP, IHE and Stage 1 Meaningful Use constraints. It provides a means for one healthcare practitioner, system, or setting to aggregate all of the pertinent data about a patient and forward it to another user to support the continuity of care. CARFAX In 1984, Edwin Barnett III started selling CARFAX reports based on 10,000 vehicle records he obtained. To grow, Barnett knew his company would need far greater access to vehicle records. In nine years' time, CARFAX was receiving automobile records from all 50 states. Within 20 years, 3 billion records were generated by dealers and shops feeding standardized data into the system. The Project and Deliverables Resolve/HTSI envision a three-phase project to develop and solidify data standards, standardized security protocols, and form an independent Standards Committee. Phase One Phase Two Phase Three 1. Preliminary Standard to be Prototyped 2. Preliminary Standards Committee Formed 3. Results of Prototype Data Transfer between Agencies Available 1. Results of Data Transfer between Agencies 2. Refined Standard 3. Stable Standards Committee 4. Better numbers achievable in testing areas 1. Widespread Global Adoption in public and private sectors 2. Robust Standards Committee 3. Ongoing Evangelization 4. Better global numbers achievable Months 1-8 Months 9-33 Month 34 onward
  • 3. HTSI: the numbers on trafficking : http://solutions-network.org/site-htsi/ Phase One (months 1 - 8) ➔ Observation of how data is used between agencies at least 12 agencies (4 agencies in 3 countries), uncovering points of agreement and negotiation. On-the-ground observation identifies and assesses how data is captured and read in each participating agency, identifies a minimum set of data, finds sets of values that make sense, and determines what data creates the most understanding and least confusion. ➔ Develop alliances with the public sector, research and think tanks, commercial tech firms and other stakeholders (e.g. funders, advocates). ➔ Normalize data for preliminary standard to include common attributes, minimum sets, and boundary conditions. ➔ Develop preliminary Standards Committee that will eventually mature to independence over the course of the project. Phase Two (2 years / months 9 - 33) ➔ Refine and solidify Standards Committee, including bi-annual meetings, committee reporting, and committee-lead monitoring and evaluation of preliminary standard. ➔ Expand research to include additional agencies to increase breadth and scope of input. ➔ Expand research with legacy agencies to hone definitions and troubleshoot protocols. ➔ Begin evangelizing the standards through conferences, stakeholders, and other forums. Phase Three (5 years / months 34++) ➔ Standards Committee evangelizes the product globally. ➔ Standard is refined at an international context level. ➔ Standards Committee takes over 100% of product evolution. ➔ Standard becomes promoted as a basis for compliance in grant funding.