Presented at Agile meets Architecture (2023-10-05)
Video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLEXAdO3X1o
One of the (most overlooked) principles of the Manifesto for Agile Software Development is that "Continuous attention to technical excellence and good design enhances agility". All too often, work that focuses on addressing technical issues is deprioritised in the name of focusing on business value.
Is there a case for technical excellence — in code, in architecture, in people — beyond its appearance on a might-as-well-be-hidden page on a manifesto that's over two decades old? Is technical excellence only the concern of technical roles? Is a good architecture in conflict with business value or a vehicle for it?
This session looks to go beyond buzzwords to build a case for technical excellence that appeals to all roles in a development organisation, noting that "The best architectures, requirements, and designs emerge from self-organizing teams".
27. As an evolving program is continually
changed, its complexity, reflecting
deteriorating structure, increases unless
work is done to maintain or reduce it.
Meir M Lehman
“Programs, Life Cycles, and Laws of Software Evolution”
30. metaphor
The figure of speech in which a name or
descriptive term is transferred to some
object different from, but analogous to,
that to which it is properly applicable.
38. To be considered good, a metaphor
has to offer a number of points of
useful correspondence with what is
being described.
Kevlin Henney
“On Exactitude in Technical Debt”
oreilly.com/radar/on-exactitude-in-technical-debt
39. Another quality of a good metaphor
is that it should not have too many
obvious points of conflict.
Kevlin Henney
“On Exactitude in Technical Debt”
oreilly.com/radar/on-exactitude-in-technical-debt
40. The third quality of a metaphor that
makes it effective is familiarity to its
audience.
Kevlin Henney
“On Exactitude in Technical Debt”
oreilly.com/radar/on-exactitude-in-technical-debt
41. Technical Debt is a wonderful metaphor
developed by Ward Cunningham.
In this metaphor, doing things the quick
and dirty way sets us up with a technical
debt, which is similar to a financial debt.
Martin Fowler
martinfowler.com/bliki/TechnicalDebt.html (2003)
43. Shipping first time code is like going into
debt. A little debt speeds development
so long as it is paid back promptly with a
rewrite.
Ward Cunningham
c2.com/doc/oopsla92.html
45. Although we know that by definition no metaphor
is perfect, there are two common ways in which
the metaphor is misapplied: assuming technical
debt is necessarily something bad; equating
technical debt with a financial debt value.
Kevlin Henney
“On Exactitude in Technical Debt”
oreilly.com/radar/on-exactitude-in-technical-debt
48. Technical debt is not the cost of repaying
the debt: it is the cost of owning the debt.
These are not the same.
Kevlin Henney
“On Exactitude in Technical Debt”
oreilly.com/radar/on-exactitude-in-technical-debt
49. That is the message of the technical debt metaphor:
it is not simply a measure of the specific work needed
to repay the debt; it is the additional time and effort
added to all past, present, and future work that comes
from having the debt in the first place.
Kevlin Henney
“On Exactitude in Technical Debt”
oreilly.com/radar/on-exactitude-in-technical-debt
54. neglect
Want of attention to what ought
to be done; the fact of leaving
something undone or unattended
to; negligence.
55. John Seddon
Freedom from Command & Control — A better way to make work work
Value demand represents the demands customers
make for the things they want, things that are of
value to them. Failure demand is created by the
organisation not working properly.
Failure demand is demand caused by a failure to
do something or do something right.