SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 21
Download to read offline
The Cosmic Dawn:
Physics of the First Luminous Objects




                 Ke-Jung (Ken) Chen
   Johnston Graduate Fellow, University of Minnesota
The First Stars
The First Stars




Abel, et al. Science (2002)   Bromm, et al. Nature (2009)

               Mass Scale ~ 100-1000 M⊙
The Death of Massive Stars
                Woosley, Heger, & Weaver (2002)



 MS Mass          He Core             Supernova Mechanism


10 ≤ M ≤ 85     2 ≤ M ≤ 32           Fe core collapse to a
                                     neutron star or black hole
                                     (GRB Talks: Aloy, Matsumoto, Mizuta)
                                      (CCSNe Talk by Suwa )

80 ≤ M ≤ 150    35 ≤ M ≤ 60           Pulsational pair instability
                                      followed by core (PPSN)

150 ≤ M ≤ 250   60 ≤ M ≤ 133          Pair instability supernova
                                      (PSN)

250 ≤ M         133 ≤ M               Black holes

                                                  Mass Unit: solar mass ⊙
Pair-Instability Supernova (PSN)
Supernovae (Energetic Explosions)
Luminous Supernovae
How to Model 3D Supernovae
1D Models
  80 - 150 M⊙ Stars (Woosley+ 2007, priv. comm.)
 150 - 250 M⊙ Stars (Heger & Woosley 2002, 2010)

CASTRO      (DOE SciDAC Computational Astrophysics Team)
 Massive Parallel, Adaptive Mesh Refinement (AMR), Multi-D,
 Radiation, Hydro, +( Nuclear Burning, Mapping, Rotation, GR, ... )
 (Almgren+ 2010, Zheng+ 2011 2012, Chen+ 2011 2012)

Supercomputers




Itasca            Franklin         Hopper             Jaguar
Explosion of a 110 M⊙ Star




       (Chen+ Nature 2013)
Explosion of a 200 M⊙ Star
More Explosions !
            (Chen+ 2012)




BSG 150       BSG 200             BSG 250




                                 No Bang !!
                              form a black hole




RSG 150       RSG 200              RSG 250
Mixing of Elements
Results
        Mass Core      E       Ni
Model                 52 erg] [M⊙] Instab.               Mixing
        [M⊙] [M⊙] [10
B150    150     67        1.29      0.07 Burning         weak
B200    200     95        4.14      6.57 Burning         weak

B250    250     109       7.23     28.05 Burning         weak

R150    150     59        1.19      0.10     Rev.        Strong

R200    200     86        3.43      4.66     Rev.        Strong

R250    250     156        ...       ...      ...          ...

                 Ni is only slightly mixed out .
          The Gamma-Ray emission for PSNe is unlikely.
Conclusions
               Fate    Very Bright      Sources          Observation

 80 ~ 150 M⊙   PPSN       YES          Pop I, II, III      Multi-SN



150 ~ 250 M⊙   PSN        YES        Pop I(?), II, III     Large Ni



  250+   M⊙    BH(?)       No              No                GW




          Mixing can be important ! 13
Formation of the First Galaxies




                              ?
       z ~ 10




                              👍
time




       z ~ 20

                              👍👍
Characters of the First Galaxies
                  Bromm, & Yoshida (2011)



•   Mass scale ~ 108 M⊙
•   Redshift ~ 10
•   Self-bound system.
•   Affected from the previous stellar feedback
•   Hosted the Pop III and Pop II stars
Modeling the Galaxy Formation
Gadget-2      ( Springel 2005)
 1. Star formation
 2. Radiative transfer
 3. Diffusion mixing
 4. Chemical cooling
 Bromm+ 2002,2003    Johnson+ 2007
 Greif+ 2009, 2010   Jeon+ 2012


Possible radiative feedbacks
 1. Ionizing photons
 2. SN shock reheating
 3. X-Ray Binaries
Chemical enrichment
 1. SN feedback
Impact of the First Stars and Supernovae
Conclusions
• All possible radiative feedback
 1. Ionizing photons
 2. SN shock reheating
 3. X-Ray Binaries
• Chemical enrichment
 1. SN feedback
 2. Pop III to Pop II transition



The impact of the first stars holds the key to the later
                 galaxy formation!!
The cosmic dawn may be observed by
Many thanks for your attention
  My work has been kindly supported by:

More Related Content

Viewers also liked (15)

Turk Hava Yollari istanbul New York Ucak Bileti Fiyatlari
Turk Hava Yollari istanbul New York Ucak Bileti FiyatlariTurk Hava Yollari istanbul New York Ucak Bileti Fiyatlari
Turk Hava Yollari istanbul New York Ucak Bileti Fiyatlari
 
Latin Phrases and Words Commonly Used in the Legal System
Latin Phrases and Words Commonly Used in the Legal SystemLatin Phrases and Words Commonly Used in the Legal System
Latin Phrases and Words Commonly Used in the Legal System
 
Turk Hava Yollari istanbul Washington Dc Ucak Bileti Fiyatlari
Turk Hava Yollari istanbul Washington Dc Ucak Bileti FiyatlariTurk Hava Yollari istanbul Washington Dc Ucak Bileti Fiyatlari
Turk Hava Yollari istanbul Washington Dc Ucak Bileti Fiyatlari
 
When can you use the tag question
When can you use the tag questionWhen can you use the tag question
When can you use the tag question
 
Body art by Eddie
Body art by EddieBody art by Eddie
Body art by Eddie
 
Manual slideshare
Manual slideshareManual slideshare
Manual slideshare
 
Authorization for the release of phi
Authorization for the release of phiAuthorization for the release of phi
Authorization for the release of phi
 
Turk Hava Yollari Telefon Numarasi
Turk Hava Yollari Telefon NumarasiTurk Hava Yollari Telefon Numarasi
Turk Hava Yollari Telefon Numarasi
 
L2 Glacial Budget
L2 Glacial BudgetL2 Glacial Budget
L2 Glacial Budget
 
Z170A XPOWER GAMING TE Ln2 OC Guide
Z170A XPOWER GAMING TE Ln2 OC GuideZ170A XPOWER GAMING TE Ln2 OC Guide
Z170A XPOWER GAMING TE Ln2 OC Guide
 
MSI DDR4 Boost
MSI DDR4 BoostMSI DDR4 Boost
MSI DDR4 Boost
 
Cpt june2013 questionpaper - final
Cpt june2013 questionpaper - finalCpt june2013 questionpaper - final
Cpt june2013 questionpaper - final
 
Manual slideshare
Manual slideshareManual slideshare
Manual slideshare
 
Mercantile law - Summary for CPT
Mercantile law - Summary for CPTMercantile law - Summary for CPT
Mercantile law - Summary for CPT
 
新版人民幣問世了
新版人民幣問世了新版人民幣問世了
新版人民幣問世了
 

Similar to Sigma2013_kejungchen

Probing Extreme Physics With Compact Objcts
Probing Extreme Physics With Compact ObjctsProbing Extreme Physics With Compact Objcts
Probing Extreme Physics With Compact ObjctsSérgio Sacani
 
Biermann AstroPhysic
Biermann AstroPhysicBiermann AstroPhysic
Biermann AstroPhysicAtner Yegorov
 
Challenging the Isotropic Cosmos
Challenging the Isotropic CosmosChallenging the Isotropic Cosmos
Challenging the Isotropic CosmosCosmoAIMS Bassett
 
Application of X-ray plasma diagnostics to nova winds
Application of X-ray plasma diagnostics to nova windsApplication of X-ray plasma diagnostics to nova winds
Application of X-ray plasma diagnostics to nova windsAstroAtom
 
Toma Susi – Atom manipulation @ MRS2018
Toma Susi – Atom manipulation @ MRS2018Toma Susi – Atom manipulation @ MRS2018
Toma Susi – Atom manipulation @ MRS2018Toma Susi
 
Introduction to Scanning Tunneling Microscopy
Introduction to Scanning Tunneling MicroscopyIntroduction to Scanning Tunneling Microscopy
Introduction to Scanning Tunneling Microscopynirupam12
 
"Squeezed States in Bose-Einstein Condensate"
"Squeezed States in Bose-Einstein Condensate""Squeezed States in Bose-Einstein Condensate"
"Squeezed States in Bose-Einstein Condensate"Chad Orzel
 

Similar to Sigma2013_kejungchen (9)

F gensenada
F gensenadaF gensenada
F gensenada
 
PhD Defense!
PhD Defense!PhD Defense!
PhD Defense!
 
Probing Extreme Physics With Compact Objcts
Probing Extreme Physics With Compact ObjctsProbing Extreme Physics With Compact Objcts
Probing Extreme Physics With Compact Objcts
 
Biermann AstroPhysic
Biermann AstroPhysicBiermann AstroPhysic
Biermann AstroPhysic
 
Challenging the Isotropic Cosmos
Challenging the Isotropic CosmosChallenging the Isotropic Cosmos
Challenging the Isotropic Cosmos
 
Application of X-ray plasma diagnostics to nova winds
Application of X-ray plasma diagnostics to nova windsApplication of X-ray plasma diagnostics to nova winds
Application of X-ray plasma diagnostics to nova winds
 
Toma Susi – Atom manipulation @ MRS2018
Toma Susi – Atom manipulation @ MRS2018Toma Susi – Atom manipulation @ MRS2018
Toma Susi – Atom manipulation @ MRS2018
 
Introduction to Scanning Tunneling Microscopy
Introduction to Scanning Tunneling MicroscopyIntroduction to Scanning Tunneling Microscopy
Introduction to Scanning Tunneling Microscopy
 
"Squeezed States in Bose-Einstein Condensate"
"Squeezed States in Bose-Einstein Condensate""Squeezed States in Bose-Einstein Condensate"
"Squeezed States in Bose-Einstein Condensate"
 

Sigma2013_kejungchen

  • 1. The Cosmic Dawn: Physics of the First Luminous Objects Ke-Jung (Ken) Chen Johnston Graduate Fellow, University of Minnesota
  • 3. The First Stars Abel, et al. Science (2002) Bromm, et al. Nature (2009) Mass Scale ~ 100-1000 M⊙
  • 4. The Death of Massive Stars Woosley, Heger, & Weaver (2002) MS Mass He Core Supernova Mechanism 10 ≤ M ≤ 85 2 ≤ M ≤ 32 Fe core collapse to a neutron star or black hole (GRB Talks: Aloy, Matsumoto, Mizuta) (CCSNe Talk by Suwa ) 80 ≤ M ≤ 150 35 ≤ M ≤ 60 Pulsational pair instability followed by core (PPSN) 150 ≤ M ≤ 250 60 ≤ M ≤ 133 Pair instability supernova (PSN) 250 ≤ M 133 ≤ M Black holes Mass Unit: solar mass ⊙
  • 8. How to Model 3D Supernovae 1D Models 80 - 150 M⊙ Stars (Woosley+ 2007, priv. comm.) 150 - 250 M⊙ Stars (Heger & Woosley 2002, 2010) CASTRO (DOE SciDAC Computational Astrophysics Team) Massive Parallel, Adaptive Mesh Refinement (AMR), Multi-D, Radiation, Hydro, +( Nuclear Burning, Mapping, Rotation, GR, ... ) (Almgren+ 2010, Zheng+ 2011 2012, Chen+ 2011 2012) Supercomputers Itasca Franklin Hopper Jaguar
  • 9. Explosion of a 110 M⊙ Star (Chen+ Nature 2013)
  • 10. Explosion of a 200 M⊙ Star
  • 11. More Explosions ! (Chen+ 2012) BSG 150 BSG 200 BSG 250 No Bang !! form a black hole RSG 150 RSG 200 RSG 250
  • 13. Results Mass Core E Ni Model 52 erg] [M⊙] Instab. Mixing [M⊙] [M⊙] [10 B150 150 67 1.29 0.07 Burning weak B200 200 95 4.14 6.57 Burning weak B250 250 109 7.23 28.05 Burning weak R150 150 59 1.19 0.10 Rev. Strong R200 200 86 3.43 4.66 Rev. Strong R250 250 156 ... ... ... ... Ni is only slightly mixed out . The Gamma-Ray emission for PSNe is unlikely.
  • 14. Conclusions Fate Very Bright Sources Observation 80 ~ 150 M⊙ PPSN YES Pop I, II, III Multi-SN 150 ~ 250 M⊙ PSN YES Pop I(?), II, III Large Ni 250+ M⊙ BH(?) No No GW Mixing can be important ! 13
  • 15. Formation of the First Galaxies ? z ~ 10 👍 time z ~ 20 👍👍
  • 16. Characters of the First Galaxies Bromm, & Yoshida (2011) • Mass scale ~ 108 M⊙ • Redshift ~ 10 • Self-bound system. • Affected from the previous stellar feedback • Hosted the Pop III and Pop II stars
  • 17. Modeling the Galaxy Formation Gadget-2 ( Springel 2005) 1. Star formation 2. Radiative transfer 3. Diffusion mixing 4. Chemical cooling Bromm+ 2002,2003 Johnson+ 2007 Greif+ 2009, 2010 Jeon+ 2012 Possible radiative feedbacks 1. Ionizing photons 2. SN shock reheating 3. X-Ray Binaries Chemical enrichment 1. SN feedback
  • 18. Impact of the First Stars and Supernovae
  • 19. Conclusions • All possible radiative feedback 1. Ionizing photons 2. SN shock reheating 3. X-Ray Binaries • Chemical enrichment 1. SN feedback 2. Pop III to Pop II transition The impact of the first stars holds the key to the later galaxy formation!!
  • 20. The cosmic dawn may be observed by
  • 21. Many thanks for your attention My work has been kindly supported by: