This document contains a peer and self evaluation scale for members of a team named Cindy, Karolina, Tony, and Richard. The evaluation contains ratings from 1 to 5 on criteria including flexibility, participation, communication, professionalism, quality of work, and meeting deadlines. Team members were evaluated by themselves and each other on these criteria, with total scores out of 30 recorded at the bottom.

1. Peer & Self Evaluations
Scale: 5-Superior, 4-Above Average, 3-Average, 2-Below Average, 1-Very Poor
Cindy Karolina Tony Richard
Flexible & Reliable
- Flexible with
day/time/meeting
place
-attend scheduled
meetings on time
Participation
- Active participation in
ARD discussions
-Fulfill obligation of
position
-Contributes ideas and
suggestions for goal
Communication
- Effectively
communicate
-Regularly update team
on progress.
-Make decisions as
team
Professionalism
- Encouraged new
ideas
-Positive attitude
toward all group
members
-Positive attitude
toward coordinators
and the public
Quality of work
-Timely submission of
project deliverables
-Documentation meets
acceptable class std.
Meeting Deadlines
-able to meet the
deadlines for all
assigned tasks
-Ask for help to keep
on goal time line
Totals: /30 /30 /30 /30