SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 22
Team Clean Sweep
Clean Sweepers
Name Year Major
Joshua Vogt Junior Industrial Distribution
Katie Schneider Sophomore Aerospace Engineering
Kanika Gakhar Sophomore Aerospace Engineering
Andres Diaz Senior Electrical Engineering
Benjamin Swain Freshman Mechanical Engineering
Yuki Oji Junior Electrical Engineering
“There is no problem so bad that you
can’t make it worse.” – Chris Hadfield
Need statement
Device to circulate throughout
the ISS and collect stray pieces
of Foreign Object Debris
Needs and Constraints
Needs Constraints
Small, unobtrusive, and inconspicuous Should not create additional debris
Ability to circulate freely in microgravity Should not weigh more than 100 g
Ability to withstand wall impacts at 5 ft/sec and un-
calibrated astronaut swats
Should not have rough edges or sharp corners
Material that will gather the FOD and is renewable Should not conduct electricity
Easy attachment and removal of the attractive
material
Should be 3D printed in a single run within a
10x10x14 space
Easy to maintain
Engineering Specifications
Requirements Metrics
Numerical
Targets
Lightweight and unobtrusive Minimum Weight of entire device <100 g
Comply with 3D Printing restrictions Minimum size (length x width x height) of all
components
< 10 x 10 x 14 cm
Ability to withstand wall impacts and
astronaut swats
Minimum yield strength of material >42 Pa
Easy to renew attractive material Number of steps to remove and insert duct
tape
< 3
FUNCTIONAL BLOCK DIAGRAM
• Human input –
setup
• Clean Duct-tape
• Suspended FODs
Inputs
• Drift passively
• Allow polluted air to
enter
• Capture suspended
FODs
• Prevent captured FODs
from escaping
Functions • Clean, FOD-free air
• Recreational Benefits
• Saturated Duct-tape
covered in captured
FODs
Outputs
Alternative Prototype 1
Shielding Structure and tendency to passively roll/bounce
Compliance with 3D Printing Restrictions
Alternative Prototype 2
Inverted sticky surface to maximize area and
efficiently capture particles
Need for active propulsion and electric components
Final Conceptual Design
Shielding Structure and tendency to passively roll/bounce
Inverted sticky surface to maximize area and efficiently capture particles
Mathematical analysis:
Proof of strength to withstand collisions
𝐼𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑉𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦: 𝑉1 = 5
𝑓𝑡
𝑠𝑒𝑐
≈ 1.5
𝑚
𝑠
𝑇𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑆𝑝𝑎𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝐶𝑜𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛: ∆𝑡 = 0.01 𝑠
𝐹𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑉𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦: 𝑉2 = 0
𝑚
𝑠
𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝐴𝑐𝑐𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛: 𝑎 =
∆𝑉
∆𝑡
= −150
𝑚
𝑠2
𝑁𝑒𝑡 𝐹𝑜𝑟𝑐𝑒: ∑𝐹 = 𝑚. 𝑎 = 15 𝑁
𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑜𝑛 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑒: 𝑃 =
𝐹
𝐴
= 1.07 𝑘𝑃𝑎
𝒀𝒊𝒆𝒍𝒅 𝑺𝒕𝒓𝒆𝒏𝒈𝒕𝒉
𝑬𝒙𝒆𝒓𝒕𝒆𝒅 𝑷𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒖𝒓𝒆
≈ 𝟏𝟎 𝟓
∴ 𝒀𝒊𝒆𝒍𝒅 𝑺𝒕𝒓𝒆𝒏𝒈𝒕𝒉
≫ 𝑷𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒖𝒓𝒆
𝑬𝒙𝒆𝒓𝒕𝒆𝒅 𝒅𝒖𝒓𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝑪𝒐𝒍𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏
𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑇𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑙𝑒 𝑌𝑖𝑒𝑙𝑑 𝑆𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ 44 𝑀𝑃𝑎
𝑜𝑓 𝐴𝐵𝑆 𝑃𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐:
𝐴𝑣𝑔. 𝑌𝑖𝑒𝑙𝑑 𝑆𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ: 𝟒𝟒 𝑴𝑷𝒂
𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑜𝑛 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑒: 𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟏 𝑴𝑷𝒂
Mathematical analysis:
Proof of maximized surface area
𝑆𝑢𝑟𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑒 𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 𝐶𝑦𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟
= 2𝜋𝑟𝑙 = 154 𝑐𝑚2
𝑺𝒖𝒓𝒇𝒂𝒄𝒆 𝑨𝒓𝒆𝒂 𝒐𝒇 𝑻𝒓𝒊𝒂𝒏𝒈𝒍𝒆𝒔
𝑺𝒖𝒓𝒇𝒂𝒄𝒆 𝑨𝒓𝒆𝒂 𝒐𝒇 𝑪𝒚𝒍𝒊𝒏𝒅𝒆𝒓
≈ 𝟏. 𝟖𝑺. 𝑨. 𝒐𝒇 𝑺𝒑𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆 > 𝑺. 𝑨. 𝒐𝒇 𝑻𝒓𝒊𝒂𝒏𝒈𝒍𝒆𝒔 > 𝑺. 𝑨. 𝒐𝒇 𝑪𝒚𝒍𝒊𝒏𝒅𝒆𝒓
𝑆𝑢𝑟𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑒 𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 𝑆𝑝ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠
= 2 ∗ 4𝜋𝑟2
= 307 𝑐𝑚2𝑆𝑢𝑟𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑒 𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 𝑇𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑙𝑒𝑠
= 16√2 ∗ 𝑟2
= 277 𝑐𝑚2
Exploded View
Assembly
Fulfillment of 3D Printer Requirements
Alternative Protection Designs
Results
Size • 7cm x 7 cm x 7 cm
Mass • 35 g
Dual tape-application
mechanism
Structurally sound
Small and unobtrusive
Maximized surface area
3D-Print within
restrictions
Alternative Implementations
• Increase size and adhesiveness
• Carry small tools and objects
Portable Storage Device
• Use lights and colors for decoration
• Use as a ball or die to play games
Interactive Recreational Die
• Insert air freshener cartridges for on-the-go freshness
Mobile Air-Freshener
Future Improvements
Add Photo-luminescent materials for night illumination
Add LED lights for signal messages
Add Sensors to indicate toxic air quality levels
Self-propulsion for quicker and automated cleaning
Incorporate an Internal Adhesive Replenishment System (IARS)
Acknowledgements
Mr. David Kanipe
Dr. Greg Chamitoff
Dr. Joe Kerwin
Mr. Rodney Boehm
Aggies Invent Organizers
EIC Volunteers and Technicians

More Related Content

Similar to Aggies Invent - Team CleanSweep

Slope project daniel
Slope project danielSlope project daniel
Slope project danielDaniel Jalili
 
GP03 Trash Compactor G07
GP03 Trash Compactor G07GP03 Trash Compactor G07
GP03 Trash Compactor G07Casey Stribrny
 
Final Presentation
Final PresentationFinal Presentation
Final PresentationAsh Abel
 
Deflection of curved beam |Strength of Material Laboratory
Deflection of curved beam |Strength of Material LaboratoryDeflection of curved beam |Strength of Material Laboratory
Deflection of curved beam |Strength of Material LaboratorySaif al-din ali
 
Lean Strategies For Injection Molding 3 Hour E Learning
Lean Strategies For Injection Molding 3 Hour E LearningLean Strategies For Injection Molding 3 Hour E Learning
Lean Strategies For Injection Molding 3 Hour E LearningGaryChastain
 
Mechanical report beam analysis
Mechanical report beam analysisMechanical report beam analysis
Mechanical report beam analysisVishnu R
 
Optimization of micro machining processes
Optimization of micro machining processesOptimization of micro machining processes
Optimization of micro machining processeskulk0003
 
Consolidated Drained (CD) Triaxial Test.pdf
Consolidated Drained (CD) Triaxial Test.pdfConsolidated Drained (CD) Triaxial Test.pdf
Consolidated Drained (CD) Triaxial Test.pdfA K
 
Blast-Resistant Window v1.4
Blast-Resistant Window v1.4Blast-Resistant Window v1.4
Blast-Resistant Window v1.4Hans Julian
 
The Study of Impact Damage on C-Type and E-Type of Fibreglass Subjected To Lo...
The Study of Impact Damage on C-Type and E-Type of Fibreglass Subjected To Lo...The Study of Impact Damage on C-Type and E-Type of Fibreglass Subjected To Lo...
The Study of Impact Damage on C-Type and E-Type of Fibreglass Subjected To Lo...theijes
 
Designing a System to prevent Pressure ulcers in wheelchair users in Ghana
Designing a System to prevent Pressure ulcers in wheelchair users in GhanaDesigning a System to prevent Pressure ulcers in wheelchair users in Ghana
Designing a System to prevent Pressure ulcers in wheelchair users in GhanaGodfred Nsiah Awuku
 
DME intro and design of cotter joint may 2020
DME intro and design of cotter joint may 2020DME intro and design of cotter joint may 2020
DME intro and design of cotter joint may 2020Gaurav Mistry
 
Introduction to force equilibrium method
Introduction to force equilibrium methodIntroduction to force equilibrium method
Introduction to force equilibrium methodMayank7173
 
Slow descent v3_IYPT
Slow descent v3_IYPTSlow descent v3_IYPT
Slow descent v3_IYPTTony Zhang
 

Similar to Aggies Invent - Team CleanSweep (20)

Slope project daniel
Slope project danielSlope project daniel
Slope project daniel
 
GP03 Trash Compactor G07
GP03 Trash Compactor G07GP03 Trash Compactor G07
GP03 Trash Compactor G07
 
Final Presentation
Final PresentationFinal Presentation
Final Presentation
 
Deflection of curved beam |Strength of Material Laboratory
Deflection of curved beam |Strength of Material LaboratoryDeflection of curved beam |Strength of Material Laboratory
Deflection of curved beam |Strength of Material Laboratory
 
Seshasai
SeshasaiSeshasai
Seshasai
 
Lean Strategies For Injection Molding 3 Hour E Learning
Lean Strategies For Injection Molding 3 Hour E LearningLean Strategies For Injection Molding 3 Hour E Learning
Lean Strategies For Injection Molding 3 Hour E Learning
 
Mechanical report beam analysis
Mechanical report beam analysisMechanical report beam analysis
Mechanical report beam analysis
 
Atmospheric Turbulence
Atmospheric TurbulenceAtmospheric Turbulence
Atmospheric Turbulence
 
Optimization of micro machining processes
Optimization of micro machining processesOptimization of micro machining processes
Optimization of micro machining processes
 
Tokyo conference
Tokyo conferenceTokyo conference
Tokyo conference
 
Consolidated Drained (CD) Triaxial Test.pdf
Consolidated Drained (CD) Triaxial Test.pdfConsolidated Drained (CD) Triaxial Test.pdf
Consolidated Drained (CD) Triaxial Test.pdf
 
Blast-Resistant Window v1.4
Blast-Resistant Window v1.4Blast-Resistant Window v1.4
Blast-Resistant Window v1.4
 
Stem Education - Wheel and Axle
Stem Education - Wheel and AxleStem Education - Wheel and Axle
Stem Education - Wheel and Axle
 
The Study of Impact Damage on C-Type and E-Type of Fibreglass Subjected To Lo...
The Study of Impact Damage on C-Type and E-Type of Fibreglass Subjected To Lo...The Study of Impact Damage on C-Type and E-Type of Fibreglass Subjected To Lo...
The Study of Impact Damage on C-Type and E-Type of Fibreglass Subjected To Lo...
 
Designing a System to prevent Pressure ulcers in wheelchair users in Ghana
Designing a System to prevent Pressure ulcers in wheelchair users in GhanaDesigning a System to prevent Pressure ulcers in wheelchair users in Ghana
Designing a System to prevent Pressure ulcers in wheelchair users in Ghana
 
ROAD AGGREGATES 01
ROAD AGGREGATES 01ROAD AGGREGATES 01
ROAD AGGREGATES 01
 
Casing design
Casing designCasing design
Casing design
 
DME intro and design of cotter joint may 2020
DME intro and design of cotter joint may 2020DME intro and design of cotter joint may 2020
DME intro and design of cotter joint may 2020
 
Introduction to force equilibrium method
Introduction to force equilibrium methodIntroduction to force equilibrium method
Introduction to force equilibrium method
 
Slow descent v3_IYPT
Slow descent v3_IYPTSlow descent v3_IYPT
Slow descent v3_IYPT
 

Aggies Invent - Team CleanSweep

  • 1.
  • 3. Clean Sweepers Name Year Major Joshua Vogt Junior Industrial Distribution Katie Schneider Sophomore Aerospace Engineering Kanika Gakhar Sophomore Aerospace Engineering Andres Diaz Senior Electrical Engineering Benjamin Swain Freshman Mechanical Engineering Yuki Oji Junior Electrical Engineering
  • 4. “There is no problem so bad that you can’t make it worse.” – Chris Hadfield
  • 5. Need statement Device to circulate throughout the ISS and collect stray pieces of Foreign Object Debris
  • 6. Needs and Constraints Needs Constraints Small, unobtrusive, and inconspicuous Should not create additional debris Ability to circulate freely in microgravity Should not weigh more than 100 g Ability to withstand wall impacts at 5 ft/sec and un- calibrated astronaut swats Should not have rough edges or sharp corners Material that will gather the FOD and is renewable Should not conduct electricity Easy attachment and removal of the attractive material Should be 3D printed in a single run within a 10x10x14 space Easy to maintain
  • 7. Engineering Specifications Requirements Metrics Numerical Targets Lightweight and unobtrusive Minimum Weight of entire device <100 g Comply with 3D Printing restrictions Minimum size (length x width x height) of all components < 10 x 10 x 14 cm Ability to withstand wall impacts and astronaut swats Minimum yield strength of material >42 Pa Easy to renew attractive material Number of steps to remove and insert duct tape < 3
  • 8. FUNCTIONAL BLOCK DIAGRAM • Human input – setup • Clean Duct-tape • Suspended FODs Inputs • Drift passively • Allow polluted air to enter • Capture suspended FODs • Prevent captured FODs from escaping Functions • Clean, FOD-free air • Recreational Benefits • Saturated Duct-tape covered in captured FODs Outputs
  • 9. Alternative Prototype 1 Shielding Structure and tendency to passively roll/bounce Compliance with 3D Printing Restrictions
  • 10. Alternative Prototype 2 Inverted sticky surface to maximize area and efficiently capture particles Need for active propulsion and electric components
  • 11. Final Conceptual Design Shielding Structure and tendency to passively roll/bounce Inverted sticky surface to maximize area and efficiently capture particles
  • 12. Mathematical analysis: Proof of strength to withstand collisions 𝐼𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑉𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦: 𝑉1 = 5 𝑓𝑡 𝑠𝑒𝑐 ≈ 1.5 𝑚 𝑠 𝑇𝑖𝑚𝑒 𝑆𝑝𝑎𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝐶𝑜𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛: ∆𝑡 = 0.01 𝑠 𝐹𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑉𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦: 𝑉2 = 0 𝑚 𝑠 𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝐴𝑐𝑐𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛: 𝑎 = ∆𝑉 ∆𝑡 = −150 𝑚 𝑠2 𝑁𝑒𝑡 𝐹𝑜𝑟𝑐𝑒: ∑𝐹 = 𝑚. 𝑎 = 15 𝑁 𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑜𝑛 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑒: 𝑃 = 𝐹 𝐴 = 1.07 𝑘𝑃𝑎 𝒀𝒊𝒆𝒍𝒅 𝑺𝒕𝒓𝒆𝒏𝒈𝒕𝒉 𝑬𝒙𝒆𝒓𝒕𝒆𝒅 𝑷𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒖𝒓𝒆 ≈ 𝟏𝟎 𝟓 ∴ 𝒀𝒊𝒆𝒍𝒅 𝑺𝒕𝒓𝒆𝒏𝒈𝒕𝒉 ≫ 𝑷𝒓𝒆𝒔𝒔𝒖𝒓𝒆 𝑬𝒙𝒆𝒓𝒕𝒆𝒅 𝒅𝒖𝒓𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝑪𝒐𝒍𝒍𝒊𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑇𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑙𝑒 𝑌𝑖𝑒𝑙𝑑 𝑆𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ 44 𝑀𝑃𝑎 𝑜𝑓 𝐴𝐵𝑆 𝑃𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐: 𝐴𝑣𝑔. 𝑌𝑖𝑒𝑙𝑑 𝑆𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ: 𝟒𝟒 𝑴𝑷𝒂 𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑜𝑛 𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑒: 𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟏 𝑴𝑷𝒂
  • 13. Mathematical analysis: Proof of maximized surface area 𝑆𝑢𝑟𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑒 𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 𝐶𝑦𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟 = 2𝜋𝑟𝑙 = 154 𝑐𝑚2 𝑺𝒖𝒓𝒇𝒂𝒄𝒆 𝑨𝒓𝒆𝒂 𝒐𝒇 𝑻𝒓𝒊𝒂𝒏𝒈𝒍𝒆𝒔 𝑺𝒖𝒓𝒇𝒂𝒄𝒆 𝑨𝒓𝒆𝒂 𝒐𝒇 𝑪𝒚𝒍𝒊𝒏𝒅𝒆𝒓 ≈ 𝟏. 𝟖𝑺. 𝑨. 𝒐𝒇 𝑺𝒑𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆 > 𝑺. 𝑨. 𝒐𝒇 𝑻𝒓𝒊𝒂𝒏𝒈𝒍𝒆𝒔 > 𝑺. 𝑨. 𝒐𝒇 𝑪𝒚𝒍𝒊𝒏𝒅𝒆𝒓 𝑆𝑢𝑟𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑒 𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 𝑆𝑝ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑠 = 2 ∗ 4𝜋𝑟2 = 307 𝑐𝑚2𝑆𝑢𝑟𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑒 𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 𝑇𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑙𝑒𝑠 = 16√2 ∗ 𝑟2 = 277 𝑐𝑚2
  • 16. Fulfillment of 3D Printer Requirements
  • 18. Results Size • 7cm x 7 cm x 7 cm Mass • 35 g Dual tape-application mechanism Structurally sound Small and unobtrusive Maximized surface area 3D-Print within restrictions
  • 19. Alternative Implementations • Increase size and adhesiveness • Carry small tools and objects Portable Storage Device • Use lights and colors for decoration • Use as a ball or die to play games Interactive Recreational Die • Insert air freshener cartridges for on-the-go freshness Mobile Air-Freshener
  • 20. Future Improvements Add Photo-luminescent materials for night illumination Add LED lights for signal messages Add Sensors to indicate toxic air quality levels Self-propulsion for quicker and automated cleaning Incorporate an Internal Adhesive Replenishment System (IARS)
  • 21.
  • 22. Acknowledgements Mr. David Kanipe Dr. Greg Chamitoff Dr. Joe Kerwin Mr. Rodney Boehm Aggies Invent Organizers EIC Volunteers and Technicians

Editor's Notes

  1. Katie
  2. Katie
  3. Katie
  4. Katie
  5. Kanika
  6. Kanika
  7. Kanika
  8. Kanika
  9. Kanika
  10. Kanika
  11. Kanika
  12. Kanika
  13. Ben
  14. Andy
  15. Ben
  16. Yuki
  17. Yuki
  18. Yuki
  19. Josh
  20. Josh