SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 25
4 MAR 2015
The Department of the Navy
The Department of the Navy
TOTAL STAFF 900,000 +
2015 Budget 147,000,000,000
• Navy PersonnelActive Duty: 325,859
• Ready Reserve: 107,055 [As of Feb 2015 ]
• Selected Reserves: 58,445
• Individual Ready Reserve: 48,610
• Reserves currently mobilized: 2,741 [As of 5 May 2015]
• Navy Department Civilian Employees: 195,259
• Ships and Submarines Deployable Battle Force Ships: 273 total: 10 aircraft
carriers 9 amphibious assault ships 10 amphibious transport docks 12 dock landing
ships 22 cruisers 62 destroyers 5 frigates 4 littoral combat ships 71 submarines
• Ships Deployed: 98 (36%)
• Aircraft (operational): 3700+
• United States Marine Corp: 300,000 U.S. Marines and civilians
3
Crisis and Contingency Operations
• Operation Unified Assistance (2004 Tsunami)
• Haiti 2010 (Earthquake)
• Operation Tomodachi (2011 Japan Earthquake/Tsunami)
• 2011 Pandang Earthquake
• Anti-Piracy Operations (Ongoing)
• Numerous other relief operations around the
world
• ISIL Operations
• Operation Enduring Freedom (Afghanistan)
4
Dr. James Willson-Quayle
Director, DON/AA-DRMD
Navy Records
Management
Program
Joel Westphal (GS-14)
Deputy Director
Navy Records Manager
SECNAV
Directives/Forms
Program
Ms. Posey (GS-13)
Directives & Issuances
Program Management
Navy Declassification
Program
Ms. Bullock (GS-14)
Declassification Program Manager
Joel Westphal (GS-14)
Deputy Director
Directives and Records Management Division
5
Navy Records Scope
• 1.2 million cubic feet stored at National
Archives Records Centers
• Cost to store and service - 20 million per year
• More than 1600 Electronic Information
Systems
• 6600 different retention schedules
• Records range from Unclassified to Top Secret
6
The First Records Crises and U.S. Navy
• One of the first, if not the first adopter of modern records management
techniques developed by LCDR Emmett J. Leahy
• First working records centers
• Some of the very first records schedules in the US Government
• Help create first leaders of our National Archives
Task and Records Management Problem
“Managing Government Records” Directive
OPNAV TV-5 Task System
Congressional Task System
Marine Corps Action
Tracking System
Records Management System
This approach is no longer
viable for the Department of
Navy enterprise. The need to
improve efficiency,
compliance, and collaboration
calls for a unified and scalable
capability.
• Many different tasking
systems
• Manual (costly) processes
• “Siloed” content
• Difficult to declare and
find records
• Minimal compliance
7
 Secretary of the Navy mandated; single, auditable and statutorily compliant system for
unified tasking and records management across the Department of the Navy
 Reduce complexity and cost while improving collaboration and compliance
 Phased transition from stove-piped legacy applications to a digital solution
Key End-User Benefits:
• Web-based capability with automation of task,
records, and document management processes
• Employs the Alfresco Enterprise Edition platform
• SharePoint-like “drag n’ drop” usability, but without
the SharePoint server constraints
• Central repository for electronic records
management, security, e-discovery, and audit
• Enable field-level personnel to easily assign
retention schedules ( “Bucket” SSICs) via menus
• System handles data security (e.g.,PII); permissions
and access controls are assigned to roles
A Modernized Solution: DON TRACKER
Department of the Navy (DON) Tasking, Records, and Consolidated Knowledge Enterprise
Repository (TRACKER)
8
Tasks and
Workflows
Manage
Documents and
Records
Certified
to DoD
5015.2-STD
One
System:
DON
TRACKER
DON TRACKER Core Capabilities
• Task Management
– Template-based tasking lifecycle management (e.g., create, assign, respond, etc.)
synchronizes tasking and recordkeeping (e.g., easier SSIC assignment)
– Workflow (e.g., routing paths, review / approval, command-specific workflow rules)
• Document Management
– Create, organize, store, retrieve, share electronic content / documents
– Role-based access, system administration, library services
• Records Management
– Creation, maintenance, use, and disposition IAW law,
policy and regulation; “Big Bucket” schedule; e-Discovery
• Reporting
– Multiple report levels, query, task completion metrics,
content audits, etc.
• Search
– Keyword search, sort, filter results via integrated storage
of structured and unstructured information, etc.
DON TRACKER is integral to efficient and effective information and knowledge management in the digital age.
9
10
The War On Crime
7/1//2014 11
The War On Drugs
12
The War On Terror
13
The War On Records
14
US Central Command and Analytics
• Combatant Command in charge of Middle East
Area of Operation
• Oversight of Joint Task Forces in Iraq and
Afghanistan
• Massive records volume due to Operations in
Iraq and Afghanistan (hundreds of terabytes)
• Records not a priority in conflict
• BUT Records are the extremely important
after the conflict ends!
15
16
Outside the Box
• The Iraqi Records Collection comprised of
many firsts which required thinking outside
the box
– First time in military history that the majority of
records created were digital (95%+)
– Largest single transfer of electronic data from a
war zone during an ongoing military operation
– Largest single collection of electronic war records
in history (so far, Afghanistan Conflict records will
dwarf Iraq’s in total size)
17
• Only a small percentage of Gulf War Records ever
made it to the National Archives
• The change in the Operational Command Structure
of the U.S. military had the effect of rendering
records management to an unimportant endeavor
• The post-war investigation into the issue reported
that many units actively burned their entire
collection of operational records rather than be
bothered to haul them back to their home stations
1991: Mission Failure
18
• Limited Staff
• 40-50 million records
• Millions of emails
• Massive amount of transitory and non-record material
• Poor organization within the primary folders
• Little Records Management Foundation inherent in the
collection (Share Drives were a mess)
• Large amount of redundancy
• Large amount of PII
The Organizational Problems
19
• It’s all a question of ROT (Redundant, Obsolete, Transitory)
 Assists in organizing unstructured content
 Assists with metadata enrichment
 Assists with locating and segregating PII from open collections
 Assists in locating sensitive data (Can assist in data spillage)
 Things we can clean up quickly without a more detailed analysis
– 0 byte files
– Unknown file extensions
– Obvious policy violations
• Executable(s) in data-only directories
• Personal files: vacation photos, music, mp3s
– Unused files
• Temporary or redundant folders
• Have not been accessed/modified in X number of years
• Policy based on records management standards
• In less than a week Active Navigation cleaned 177,282 files on the F, I and M Drives
on the Iraq SAN totaling over 1.18 TB worth of useless data.
Document Analytics
20
In the end, all we have left are the records
21
“Who Are We, Why Are We
Here?”
22
The Records Profession
• Records Manager’s “will not exist” in 5-10 years?
• We have lost our way
• Too much concentration on retention, not enough on IT and
current life-cycle
• Often times I feel the word record has become a dirty word
• We must reassert our claim to control what was once ours
• We must become more broadly defined
• We must choose our path, or one WILL be created for us
7/1//2014 23
Our Records Past and Present
• The CIO and the negative impact
• We have been stripped of many things we
used to make decisions on by IT and the CIO
• CIO Today = No Information
• Our control over the Information Life-Cycle
has become distorted and too many RM are
no longer in control of it
24
Our Records Future
• We must look to new ideas at home and more
importantly, abroad
• ARMA is key factor in deciding where RM will
go
• We must choose a new path
• Chief Information Governance Officer (CIGO)
or Chief Data Officer (CDO)?
• We must make the choice or the choice will be
made for us
7/1//2014 25
QUESTIONS

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Todos Juntos Podemos Ler no Laranjeiro 3 - 14/15
Todos Juntos Podemos Ler no Laranjeiro 3 - 14/15Todos Juntos Podemos Ler no Laranjeiro 3 - 14/15
Todos Juntos Podemos Ler no Laranjeiro 3 - 14/15Susanasanti
 
Music Visualizer - Embedded Systems
Music Visualizer - Embedded SystemsMusic Visualizer - Embedded Systems
Music Visualizer - Embedded SystemsMatthew Howa
 
Mètodo de investigaciòn
Mètodo de investigaciònMètodo de investigaciòn
Mètodo de investigaciònLis28012000
 
Tx periodontal px hp
Tx periodontal px hpTx periodontal px hp
Tx periodontal px hpJosh Ochoa
 
PuppetConf 2016: Enjoying the Journey from Puppet 3.x to 4.x – Rob Nelson, AT&T
PuppetConf 2016: Enjoying the Journey from Puppet 3.x to 4.x – Rob Nelson, AT&T PuppetConf 2016: Enjoying the Journey from Puppet 3.x to 4.x – Rob Nelson, AT&T
PuppetConf 2016: Enjoying the Journey from Puppet 3.x to 4.x – Rob Nelson, AT&T Puppet
 
Resolução see nº 2197
Resolução see nº 2197Resolução see nº 2197
Resolução see nº 2197NTEPatrocinio
 

Viewers also liked (8)

Todos Juntos Podemos Ler no Laranjeiro 3 - 14/15
Todos Juntos Podemos Ler no Laranjeiro 3 - 14/15Todos Juntos Podemos Ler no Laranjeiro 3 - 14/15
Todos Juntos Podemos Ler no Laranjeiro 3 - 14/15
 
B. Art et Scient
B. Art et ScientB. Art et Scient
B. Art et Scient
 
Music Visualizer - Embedded Systems
Music Visualizer - Embedded SystemsMusic Visualizer - Embedded Systems
Music Visualizer - Embedded Systems
 
Sm module (2)
Sm module (2)Sm module (2)
Sm module (2)
 
Mètodo de investigaciòn
Mètodo de investigaciònMètodo de investigaciòn
Mètodo de investigaciòn
 
Tx periodontal px hp
Tx periodontal px hpTx periodontal px hp
Tx periodontal px hp
 
PuppetConf 2016: Enjoying the Journey from Puppet 3.x to 4.x – Rob Nelson, AT&T
PuppetConf 2016: Enjoying the Journey from Puppet 3.x to 4.x – Rob Nelson, AT&T PuppetConf 2016: Enjoying the Journey from Puppet 3.x to 4.x – Rob Nelson, AT&T
PuppetConf 2016: Enjoying the Journey from Puppet 3.x to 4.x – Rob Nelson, AT&T
 
Resolução see nº 2197
Resolução see nº 2197Resolução see nº 2197
Resolução see nº 2197
 

Similar to (IRMS) WHO ARE WE_WHY ARE WE HERE_FINAL

Update from Archives New Zealand Wellington forum June 2012
Update from Archives New Zealand   Wellington forum June 2012Update from Archives New Zealand   Wellington forum June 2012
Update from Archives New Zealand Wellington forum June 2012RecordkeepingForum
 
Alma_Implementation_slides_May06_2016
Alma_Implementation_slides_May06_2016Alma_Implementation_slides_May06_2016
Alma_Implementation_slides_May06_2016mahongzn
 
Module 1 - Introduction to Records Management.pdf
Module 1 - Introduction to Records Management.pdfModule 1 - Introduction to Records Management.pdf
Module 1 - Introduction to Records Management.pdfERMIYASTARIKU2
 
Module 1 - Introduction to Records Management.pdf
Module 1 - Introduction to Records Management.pdfModule 1 - Introduction to Records Management.pdf
Module 1 - Introduction to Records Management.pdfERMIYASTARIKU2
 
Dynamic Records Management in SharePoint
Dynamic Records Management in SharePointDynamic Records Management in SharePoint
Dynamic Records Management in SharePointjustinong1
 
Capitalizing on the Cloud
Capitalizing on the CloudCapitalizing on the Cloud
Capitalizing on the CloudGovLoop
 
Putting the Pieces Together: Creating a National Educational Television Catalog
Putting the Pieces Together: Creating a National Educational Television CatalogPutting the Pieces Together: Creating a National Educational Television Catalog
Putting the Pieces Together: Creating a National Educational Television CatalogWGBH Media Library and Archives
 
Share point records management presentation
Share point records management presentationShare point records management presentation
Share point records management presentationWyngate Solutions
 
Web Archiving – Lessons and Potential
 Web Archiving – Lessons and Potential Web Archiving – Lessons and Potential
Web Archiving – Lessons and PotentialDaniel Gomes
 
Building Digital Collections: Managing and Sharing
Building Digital Collections: Managing and SharingBuilding Digital Collections: Managing and Sharing
Building Digital Collections: Managing and SharingRecollection Wisconsin
 
"Filling the Digital Preservation Gap" with Archivematica
"Filling the Digital Preservation Gap" with Archivematica"Filling the Digital Preservation Gap" with Archivematica
"Filling the Digital Preservation Gap" with ArchivematicaJenny Mitcham
 
What's Up with Docs?!?: The Peculiarities of Cataloging Federal Government Se...
What's Up with Docs?!?: The Peculiarities of Cataloging Federal Government Se...What's Up with Docs?!?: The Peculiarities of Cataloging Federal Government Se...
What's Up with Docs?!?: The Peculiarities of Cataloging Federal Government Se...NASIG
 
Ala cspace aspace rep services demo 2015
Ala cspace aspace rep services demo 2015Ala cspace aspace rep services demo 2015
Ala cspace aspace rep services demo 2015LYRASIS
 
Digital Preservation - Manage and Provide Access
Digital Preservation - Manage and Provide AccessDigital Preservation - Manage and Provide Access
Digital Preservation - Manage and Provide AccessMichaelPaulmeno
 
"Curation-Ready" Workflows for Digitized Photograph Collections: A Temporary ...
"Curation-Ready" Workflows for Digitized Photograph Collections: A Temporary ..."Curation-Ready" Workflows for Digitized Photograph Collections: A Temporary ...
"Curation-Ready" Workflows for Digitized Photograph Collections: A Temporary ...Visual Resources Association
 

Similar to (IRMS) WHO ARE WE_WHY ARE WE HERE_FINAL (20)

Update from Archives New Zealand Wellington forum June 2012
Update from Archives New Zealand   Wellington forum June 2012Update from Archives New Zealand   Wellington forum June 2012
Update from Archives New Zealand Wellington forum June 2012
 
Alma_Implementation_slides_May06_2016
Alma_Implementation_slides_May06_2016Alma_Implementation_slides_May06_2016
Alma_Implementation_slides_May06_2016
 
Module 1 - Introduction to Records Management.pdf
Module 1 - Introduction to Records Management.pdfModule 1 - Introduction to Records Management.pdf
Module 1 - Introduction to Records Management.pdf
 
Module 1 - Introduction to Records Management.pdf
Module 1 - Introduction to Records Management.pdfModule 1 - Introduction to Records Management.pdf
Module 1 - Introduction to Records Management.pdf
 
Measuring impact
Measuring impactMeasuring impact
Measuring impact
 
292 daniel dollar ssp yale_28_may2008
292 daniel dollar ssp yale_28_may2008292 daniel dollar ssp yale_28_may2008
292 daniel dollar ssp yale_28_may2008
 
Dynamic Records Management in SharePoint
Dynamic Records Management in SharePointDynamic Records Management in SharePoint
Dynamic Records Management in SharePoint
 
Winnipeg digital dec 2019
Winnipeg digital dec 2019Winnipeg digital dec 2019
Winnipeg digital dec 2019
 
Capitalizing on the Cloud
Capitalizing on the CloudCapitalizing on the Cloud
Capitalizing on the Cloud
 
Putting the Pieces Together: Creating a National Educational Television Catalog
Putting the Pieces Together: Creating a National Educational Television CatalogPutting the Pieces Together: Creating a National Educational Television Catalog
Putting the Pieces Together: Creating a National Educational Television Catalog
 
Share point records management presentation
Share point records management presentationShare point records management presentation
Share point records management presentation
 
Web Archiving – Lessons and Potential
 Web Archiving – Lessons and Potential Web Archiving – Lessons and Potential
Web Archiving – Lessons and Potential
 
Oct 15 NISO Webinar: 21st Century Resource Sharing: Which Inter-Library Loan ...
Oct 15 NISO Webinar: 21st Century Resource Sharing: Which Inter-Library Loan ...Oct 15 NISO Webinar: 21st Century Resource Sharing: Which Inter-Library Loan ...
Oct 15 NISO Webinar: 21st Century Resource Sharing: Which Inter-Library Loan ...
 
Building Digital Collections: Managing and Sharing
Building Digital Collections: Managing and SharingBuilding Digital Collections: Managing and Sharing
Building Digital Collections: Managing and Sharing
 
"Filling the Digital Preservation Gap" with Archivematica
"Filling the Digital Preservation Gap" with Archivematica"Filling the Digital Preservation Gap" with Archivematica
"Filling the Digital Preservation Gap" with Archivematica
 
What's Up with Docs?!?: The Peculiarities of Cataloging Federal Government Se...
What's Up with Docs?!?: The Peculiarities of Cataloging Federal Government Se...What's Up with Docs?!?: The Peculiarities of Cataloging Federal Government Se...
What's Up with Docs?!?: The Peculiarities of Cataloging Federal Government Se...
 
Ala cspace aspace rep services demo 2015
Ala cspace aspace rep services demo 2015Ala cspace aspace rep services demo 2015
Ala cspace aspace rep services demo 2015
 
Digital Preservation - Manage and Provide Access
Digital Preservation - Manage and Provide AccessDigital Preservation - Manage and Provide Access
Digital Preservation - Manage and Provide Access
 
Hamooya
HamooyaHamooya
Hamooya
 
"Curation-Ready" Workflows for Digitized Photograph Collections: A Temporary ...
"Curation-Ready" Workflows for Digitized Photograph Collections: A Temporary ..."Curation-Ready" Workflows for Digitized Photograph Collections: A Temporary ...
"Curation-Ready" Workflows for Digitized Photograph Collections: A Temporary ...
 

(IRMS) WHO ARE WE_WHY ARE WE HERE_FINAL

  • 1. 4 MAR 2015 The Department of the Navy
  • 2. The Department of the Navy TOTAL STAFF 900,000 + 2015 Budget 147,000,000,000 • Navy PersonnelActive Duty: 325,859 • Ready Reserve: 107,055 [As of Feb 2015 ] • Selected Reserves: 58,445 • Individual Ready Reserve: 48,610 • Reserves currently mobilized: 2,741 [As of 5 May 2015] • Navy Department Civilian Employees: 195,259 • Ships and Submarines Deployable Battle Force Ships: 273 total: 10 aircraft carriers 9 amphibious assault ships 10 amphibious transport docks 12 dock landing ships 22 cruisers 62 destroyers 5 frigates 4 littoral combat ships 71 submarines • Ships Deployed: 98 (36%) • Aircraft (operational): 3700+ • United States Marine Corp: 300,000 U.S. Marines and civilians
  • 3. 3 Crisis and Contingency Operations • Operation Unified Assistance (2004 Tsunami) • Haiti 2010 (Earthquake) • Operation Tomodachi (2011 Japan Earthquake/Tsunami) • 2011 Pandang Earthquake • Anti-Piracy Operations (Ongoing) • Numerous other relief operations around the world • ISIL Operations • Operation Enduring Freedom (Afghanistan)
  • 4. 4 Dr. James Willson-Quayle Director, DON/AA-DRMD Navy Records Management Program Joel Westphal (GS-14) Deputy Director Navy Records Manager SECNAV Directives/Forms Program Ms. Posey (GS-13) Directives & Issuances Program Management Navy Declassification Program Ms. Bullock (GS-14) Declassification Program Manager Joel Westphal (GS-14) Deputy Director Directives and Records Management Division
  • 5. 5 Navy Records Scope • 1.2 million cubic feet stored at National Archives Records Centers • Cost to store and service - 20 million per year • More than 1600 Electronic Information Systems • 6600 different retention schedules • Records range from Unclassified to Top Secret
  • 6. 6 The First Records Crises and U.S. Navy • One of the first, if not the first adopter of modern records management techniques developed by LCDR Emmett J. Leahy • First working records centers • Some of the very first records schedules in the US Government • Help create first leaders of our National Archives
  • 7. Task and Records Management Problem “Managing Government Records” Directive OPNAV TV-5 Task System Congressional Task System Marine Corps Action Tracking System Records Management System This approach is no longer viable for the Department of Navy enterprise. The need to improve efficiency, compliance, and collaboration calls for a unified and scalable capability. • Many different tasking systems • Manual (costly) processes • “Siloed” content • Difficult to declare and find records • Minimal compliance 7
  • 8.  Secretary of the Navy mandated; single, auditable and statutorily compliant system for unified tasking and records management across the Department of the Navy  Reduce complexity and cost while improving collaboration and compliance  Phased transition from stove-piped legacy applications to a digital solution Key End-User Benefits: • Web-based capability with automation of task, records, and document management processes • Employs the Alfresco Enterprise Edition platform • SharePoint-like “drag n’ drop” usability, but without the SharePoint server constraints • Central repository for electronic records management, security, e-discovery, and audit • Enable field-level personnel to easily assign retention schedules ( “Bucket” SSICs) via menus • System handles data security (e.g.,PII); permissions and access controls are assigned to roles A Modernized Solution: DON TRACKER Department of the Navy (DON) Tasking, Records, and Consolidated Knowledge Enterprise Repository (TRACKER) 8 Tasks and Workflows Manage Documents and Records Certified to DoD 5015.2-STD One System: DON TRACKER
  • 9. DON TRACKER Core Capabilities • Task Management – Template-based tasking lifecycle management (e.g., create, assign, respond, etc.) synchronizes tasking and recordkeeping (e.g., easier SSIC assignment) – Workflow (e.g., routing paths, review / approval, command-specific workflow rules) • Document Management – Create, organize, store, retrieve, share electronic content / documents – Role-based access, system administration, library services • Records Management – Creation, maintenance, use, and disposition IAW law, policy and regulation; “Big Bucket” schedule; e-Discovery • Reporting – Multiple report levels, query, task completion metrics, content audits, etc. • Search – Keyword search, sort, filter results via integrated storage of structured and unstructured information, etc. DON TRACKER is integral to efficient and effective information and knowledge management in the digital age. 9
  • 10. 10 The War On Crime
  • 12. 12 The War On Terror
  • 13. 13 The War On Records
  • 14. 14 US Central Command and Analytics • Combatant Command in charge of Middle East Area of Operation • Oversight of Joint Task Forces in Iraq and Afghanistan • Massive records volume due to Operations in Iraq and Afghanistan (hundreds of terabytes) • Records not a priority in conflict • BUT Records are the extremely important after the conflict ends!
  • 15. 15
  • 16. 16 Outside the Box • The Iraqi Records Collection comprised of many firsts which required thinking outside the box – First time in military history that the majority of records created were digital (95%+) – Largest single transfer of electronic data from a war zone during an ongoing military operation – Largest single collection of electronic war records in history (so far, Afghanistan Conflict records will dwarf Iraq’s in total size)
  • 17. 17 • Only a small percentage of Gulf War Records ever made it to the National Archives • The change in the Operational Command Structure of the U.S. military had the effect of rendering records management to an unimportant endeavor • The post-war investigation into the issue reported that many units actively burned their entire collection of operational records rather than be bothered to haul them back to their home stations 1991: Mission Failure
  • 18. 18 • Limited Staff • 40-50 million records • Millions of emails • Massive amount of transitory and non-record material • Poor organization within the primary folders • Little Records Management Foundation inherent in the collection (Share Drives were a mess) • Large amount of redundancy • Large amount of PII The Organizational Problems
  • 19. 19 • It’s all a question of ROT (Redundant, Obsolete, Transitory)  Assists in organizing unstructured content  Assists with metadata enrichment  Assists with locating and segregating PII from open collections  Assists in locating sensitive data (Can assist in data spillage)  Things we can clean up quickly without a more detailed analysis – 0 byte files – Unknown file extensions – Obvious policy violations • Executable(s) in data-only directories • Personal files: vacation photos, music, mp3s – Unused files • Temporary or redundant folders • Have not been accessed/modified in X number of years • Policy based on records management standards • In less than a week Active Navigation cleaned 177,282 files on the F, I and M Drives on the Iraq SAN totaling over 1.18 TB worth of useless data. Document Analytics
  • 20. 20 In the end, all we have left are the records
  • 21. 21 “Who Are We, Why Are We Here?”
  • 22. 22 The Records Profession • Records Manager’s “will not exist” in 5-10 years? • We have lost our way • Too much concentration on retention, not enough on IT and current life-cycle • Often times I feel the word record has become a dirty word • We must reassert our claim to control what was once ours • We must become more broadly defined • We must choose our path, or one WILL be created for us
  • 23. 7/1//2014 23 Our Records Past and Present • The CIO and the negative impact • We have been stripped of many things we used to make decisions on by IT and the CIO • CIO Today = No Information • Our control over the Information Life-Cycle has become distorted and too many RM are no longer in control of it
  • 24. 24 Our Records Future • We must look to new ideas at home and more importantly, abroad • ARMA is key factor in deciding where RM will go • We must choose a new path • Chief Information Governance Officer (CIGO) or Chief Data Officer (CDO)? • We must make the choice or the choice will be made for us

Editor's Notes

  1. Multiple standalone USN and USMC applications and spreadsheets resulting in “sneaker net” Increasing tasking interdependencies and volume with accelerated response times Time-intensive coordination, routing and “handoffs” Inconsistent records lifecycle management; varying compliance with changing federal and DON policy Increasing FOIA requests Action Officers handle 100-200 taskers daily ~8,000 actions daily associated with Congressional requests ~30 different TM and RM business processes ~23 disconnected TM and RM software applications & tools 250,000-300,000 users DON CIO application rationalization strategy Federal law for electronic records management and FOIA response
  2. We are here for them
  3. https://screen.yahoo.com/joyride-ross-perot-000000231.html