SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 59
Download to read offline
Generating	Exports	to	China	for		
New	York’s	Agriculture,	Food	&	
Beverage	Sector	
A	Project	of	Cornell	Cooperative	Extension	
Funded	by	a	grant	from	Empire	State	Development
	
Final	Report	
July	2016	
	
	
Author:	Jim	Manning,	Cornell	Cooperative	Extension		
of	Oneida	County
-	2	-
-	3	-	
TABLE	OF	CONTENTS	
	
Executive	Summary	(page	5)	
Introduction	and	Project	Background	(page	7)	
Goals	of	the	Project	(page	14)	
Steps	Taken	to	Implement	the	Project	(page	15)	
Sales	Development	(page	15)	
Strategic	Market	Targeting	and	Analysis	(page	16)	
Overall	Market	Analysis	(page	19)	
The	Distribution	Channel	(page	21)	
Product	Category	Analyses	(page	25)	
Distributor	Lists	(page	34)	
The	Online	Opportunity	(page	37)	
Analysis	of	Private	Label	(page	41)	
Database	of	NYS	Food	and	Beverage	Producers	with	Export	Potential	(page	42)	
Survey	of	Export	Activity	and	Potential	(page	44)	
Evaluating	the	Project’s	Overall	Effectiveness	(page	45)	
Challenges	or	Unexpected	Events	(page	48)	
Steps	Needed	to	Replicate	This	Effort	and	FAQs	(page	49)	
Feedback	Regarding	this	ESD	Program	(page	58)	
Acknowledgements	(page	59)	
	
APPENDICES		(posted	at	https://goo.gl/VTQctE)		
1a	–	CCE	Proposal	2013-06-07	
1b	–	Creating	NYS	Jobs	Final	2012-12-13	(SST	proposal)	
2	–	Grant	Disbursement	Agreement	2013-07-18	
3a	–	Database	narrative	
3b	–	Database	–	Companies	with	High	Potential	
3c	–	Database	–	All	companies		
4	–	Survey	
5	–	SST	Final	Report	2015-03	
6	–	Market	analyses	
7	–	Outreach	documents
-	4	-
-	5	-	
Executive	Summary	
	
In	early	2013	Safe	Source	Trading	LLC	(SST)		had	made	the	case	to	officials	in	New	York	State	
government	that	there	were	immediate	opportunities	to	increase	sales	of	New	York	State	food	
products	to	China,	given	China’s	increasing	affluence	as	well	as	the	increasing	alarm	among	
Chinese	consumers	about	the	country’s	environmental	and	food	safety	challenges1
.			
					
In	response	to	contacts	from	the	Governor’s	office,	Associate	Director	of	CCE	Chris	Watkins	
(now	CCE	Director)	tasked	the	author	of	this	report	with	developing	a	proposal	for	funding	to	
explore	and	develop	this	opportunity2
.		The	project	was	subsequently	funded	in	June	of	2013,	
and	the	author	of	this	report	served	as	Project	Manager.		
	
As	detailed	in	the	following	pages	and	the	voluminous	appendices,	the	results	of	the	project	
were	mixed.		Safe	Source	Trading	had	represented	that	as	a	result	of	their	efforts,	with	CCE	and	
New	York	State’s	support,	they	would	generate	a	large	and	growing	flow	of	exports	of	New	York	
State	agricultural,	food	and	beverage	products.		In	reality,	despite	the	support	they	received	
including	adjustments	to	the	terms	of	their	subcontract,	Safe	Source	was	able	to	consummate	
just	one	sale	representing	a	small	fraction	of	the	revenues	they	had	projected;	and	more	than	a	
year	after	that	sale	was	consummated	there	is	no	suggestion	that	Safe	Source	has	been	able	to	
build	on	that	small	success.	
	
On	the	other	hand,	as	also	detailed	in	the	attached,	the	CCE	Project	Manager	and	a	small	team	
working	on	the	project	were	able	to	develop	a	large	amount	of	useful,	actionable	information	
about	the	market	opportunity;	to	develop	a	valuable	database	of	current	or	potential	exporters	
in	the	agriculture,	food	and	beverage	sectors;	to	disseminate	the	information	developed	to	
interested	businesses	along	with	recommendations	for	next	steps;	and	generally	to	increase	the	
capacity	of	New	York	State	and	specifically	the	Cornell	Cooperative	Extension	system	to	support	
these	businesses	as	export	markets	become	an	increasingly	important	consideration	for	them.	
	
This	report	includes	specific	recommendations	for	next	steps	including:			
• Consolidating	and	increasing	the	ease	of	access	to	existing	resources	that	support	
businesses	beginning	or	growing	their	export	activities;		
• Developing	a	program	of	direct	China	market	entry	support	for	medium	to	large	
companies	in	targeted	sectors	where	strong	opportunities	have	been	identified;		
• Developing	a	statewide	digital	marketing	strategy	for	China	in	recognition	of	the	
explosive	growth	of	the	Chinese	commercial	internet;	and		
• Strengthening	cooperative	marketing	programs,	with	a	special	focus	on	export	
development,	for	New	York’s	maple	and	honey	industries,	whose	particular	
characteristics	offer	unique	opportunities	for	growth.						
																																																								
1
	Appendix	1b:	Creating	Jobs	Through	China	Exports	and	FDI	-	A	Proposal	for	New	York	State	(Jeremy	
Haft,	Safe	Source	Trading)	
2
	Appendix	1a:	CCE	Proposal	2013-06-07
-	6	-
-	7	-	
Introduction	and	Project	Background	
	
In	early	2013,	Empire	State	Development	was	asked	by	the	Governor’s	office	to	consider	
funding	an	effort	through	Cornell	Cooperative	Extension	(CCE)	to	increase	exports	of	New	York	
State’s	food	and	agricultural	products	to	China.		The	immediate	driver	of	the	request	was	a	
conversation	or	series	of	conversations	between	Jeremy	Haft	and	Chris	Lapetina,	of	the	newly	
formed	SafeSource	Trading	LLC	(SST),	and	Andrew	Kennedy,	the	Governor’s	Assistant	Secretary	
for	Economic	Development,	and	others	in	the	Governor’s	office.			
	
SST	had	made	the	case	that	there	were	immediate	opportunities	to	increase	sales	of	New	York	
State	food	products	to	China,	given	China’s	increasing	affluence	as	well	as	the	increasing	alarm	
among	Chinese	consumers	about	the	country’s	environmental	and	food	safety	challenges3
.			
					
In	response	to	contacts	from	the	Governor’s	office,	Associate	Director	of	CCE	Chris	Watkins	
(now	CCE	Director)	tasked	the	author	of	this	report	with	developing	a	proposal	for	funding	to	
explore	and	develop	this	opportunity.			
	
Project	Rationale	
	
Access	to	international	markets	is	a	strategic	growth	opportunity	for	any	company.	At	the	time	
of	the	initiation	of	this	project,	the	increasing	purchasing	power	of	China	-	and	specifically	of	
members	of	China’s	middle	class	-	was	emerging	as	the	largest	growth	opportunity	in	the	world	
for	consumer	goods	in	general	and	for	food	products	in	particular.		However,	opening	doors	to	
these	markets	clearly	required	special	expertise	and	an	ability	to	commit	resources	that	might	
be	beyond	the	capacity	of	many	small	and	medium	sized	businesses.		Even	larger	companies	
have	to	prioritize	their	efforts,	and	the	risks	and	potential	rewards	of	entering	a	new,	distant,	
and	in	many	ways	undeveloped	market	would	need	to	be	carefully	weighed.	
	
On	the	demand	side,	several	specific	factors	in	China	provided	the	fundamental	rationale	for	
this	project:	
			
• Increased	purchasing	power	and	changing	buying	habits	of	the	emerging	Chinese	
middle	class.		At	the	time	that	the	project	was	initiated,	China’s	middle	class	was	
estimated	at	300	million,	more	than	the	entire	U.S.	population4
.		The	rise	in	the	
purchasing	power	of	the	Chinese	population	had	been	accompanied	by	a	rise	in	demand	
for	imported	products.	
	
• Food	safety/quality	and	environmental	concerns	in	China.		Hundreds	of	food	safety	
scandals	had	happened	over	the	previous	few	years,	with	hundreds	of	thousands	falling	
sick	(including	many	children,	especially	in	three	major	dairy	cases)	and	several	deaths.		
																																																								
3
	Appendix	1b:	Creating	Jobs	Through	China	Exports	and	FDI	-	A	Proposal	for	New	York	State	
(Jeremy	Haft,	Safe	Source	Trading)	
4
	http://money.cnn.com/2012/04/25/news/economy/china-middle-class/index.htm
-	8	-	
In	2011/12,	the	Chinese	police	discovered	over	5,200	cases	of	unsafe	food5
.		The	
products	affected	the	most	through	the	years	were	dairy,	produce	and	meat	(especially	
pork).	
	
• Relative	underdevelopment	of	New	York’s	trade	with	China.		While	China	was	already	
America’s	third-largest	export	market,	it	was	only	New	York’s	sixth	largest	export	
market.		Furthermore,	most	of	New	York’s	exports	consisted	of	durable	goods,	while	
perishables,	including	safe	food	products,	were	urgently	in	demand	by	China.		China	had	
recently	become	the	world’s	number	one	importer	of	agricultural	products6
.		Since	
2000,	U.S.	exports	to	China	were	up	542%;	in	2011	alone,	exports	grew	13.1%	and	broke	
the	$100	billion	mark7
.		In	2013,	exports	of	US	food	&	beverage	products	to	China	were	
valued	at	$20	billion.		In	the	period	2009-2013	food	&	beverage	exports	from	the	US	to	
China	grew	at	a	14%	Compound	Annual	Growth	Rate	(CAGR).	
	
On	the	supply	side,	the	quality	and	diversity	of	New	York	State	food	and	beverage	industries	
appeared	to	be	a	good	match	for	Chinese	demand.		In	2011,	New	York’s	agricultural	sector	
delivered	$5.3	billion	in	product	sales,	according	to	the	USDA’s	National	Agricultural	Statistics	
Services.		Milk	and	other	dairy	products	contributed	more	than	half	of	that	sales	volume,	but	
the	state	also	produces	significant	volumes	of	a	variety	of	other	agricultural	and	food	products,	
including	specialty	crops	such	as	tree	fruits;	grapes;	vegetables	(cabbage,	sweet	corn,	onions,	
snap	beans,	tomatoes,	pumpkins,	cucumbers,	squash,	and	cauliflower);	maple	syrup;	meat;	and	
poultry.		Some	of	these	products	should,	in	principle,	be	well	matched	to	Chinese	increased	
demand,	especially	given	the	above-mentioned	food	safety	concerns.		New	York	State	already	
exported	about	$1.3	billion	in	agricultural	products	according	to	the	USDA’s	Economic	Research	
Service,	although	the	majority	of	that	trade	was	(and	is)	with	neighboring	countries.	
	
While	commodities	have	been	the	bulk	of	existing	food	exports	to	China	from	the	US,	the	
specifics	of	Chinese	demand	and	New	York’s	increasingly	diverse	food	and	beverage	productive	
capacity	supported	a	focus	on	opportunities	with	specialty	products,	including	value-added	and	
branded	products	that	could	be	expected	to	command	premium	prices	or,	at	least,	not	to	
compete	primarily	on	price.		New	York	State’s	agricultural,	food,	and	beverage	products	are	of	
certifiable	quality	and	safety,	although	to	date	there	may	have	been	insufficient	emphasis	
placed	on	promoting	those	characteristics;	and	there	was	evidence	that	the	Chinese	were	
willing	to	pay	a	premium	for	safe	products	of	recognized	quality.	
	
Anecdotal	reports	and	CCE	staff	observations	confirmed	that	the	Chinese	market	had	been	
reaching	out	for	NYS	agricultural,	food	and	beverage	products,	but	there	had	been	no	
coordinated	statewide	effort	to	develop	the	opportunity.		As	noted	earlier,	many	companies	
lack	the	resources	and	the	expertise	in	the	market.		The	project	proposal	developed	by	CCE	was	
																																																								
5
	https://cricket.yahoo.com/news/china-wages-war-against-adulterated-food-fake-drgs-
053258787.html	
6
	Bloomberg	News,	“China	overtakes	the	U.S.	as	Top	Crop	importer”,	September	20,	2012	
7
	Business	Week,	“China’s	surprising	U.S.	buying	spree”,	March	27,	2012.
-	9	-	
intended	to	help	understand	the	challenges	and	develop	the	opportunities	in	response	to	the	
identified	demand.	
	
	
Project	Proposal	
	
The	project	proposal8
	was	submitted	by	Cornell	Cooperative	Extension	in	June	2013	and	was	
funded	by	Empire	State	Development	on	July	18	2013.		The	proposal	provided	for	Cornell	
Cooperative	Extension	of	Oneida	County	(CCEOC)	to	lead	a	statewide	effort	over	an	18-month	
period	with	the	goal	of	increasing	food	and	agriculture	sector	exports,	and	to	focus	that	effort	
on	the	development	of	exports	of	unique,	differentiated	NYS	products,	including	both	fresh	and	
processed	products,	to	the	emerging	middle	class	and	affluent	consumers	of	China.		Market	
development	activities	were	to	be	led	by	SST	under	contract	to	CCEOC.	
	
CCE	proposed	to	deploy	a	full-time	Project	Manager	from	CCEOC	who	would	lead	the	initiative	
for	18	months.		The	proposed	Project	Manager	(the	author	of	this	report)	was	to	work	with	CCE	
and	Extension	Agriculture	Economic	Development	staff	located	around	New	York	State;	and	
also,	as	appropriate	and	available,	to	engage	Cornell	University	staff,	faculty	and	graduate	
students	with	specific	expertise	and	interest	in	developing	markets	for	New	York’s	agricultural	
products.		The	budget	also	provided	for	a	part-time	Project	Administrator.			
	
CCEOC	committed	to	contract	with	SST	for	the	first	8	months	of	the	project.		SST	was	to	act	as	a	
full-service,	non-exclusive	export	agent	with	a	brief	to	develop	sales	and	fulfill	initial	orders	
from	Chinese	customers.			SST	envisioned	a	team	composed	of	10	people:	6	in	the	US,	with	
people	in	charge	of	the	following	areas:		Marketing,	Sales,	Logistics,	Government	affairs,	and	
Procurement;	as	well	as	a	team	of	3	in	China.		The	SST	effort	was	to	be	led	by	Jeremy	Haft,	a	
self-described	“serial	entrepreneur”	based	in	Washington	DC	with	over	15	years’	experience	in	
China,	and	his	China-based	partner	Wang	Feng,	a	native	Chinese	with	reported	strong	business	
and	government	connections		
	
SST	represented	that	it	had,	on	its	own,	been	developing	the	Chinese	market	for	the	previous	
12	months	and	had	achieved	some	initial	progress:	
	
- Through	its	efforts,	it	had	established	relationships	and	sales	opportunities	with	the	
hotel	Industry	in	China.		Tourism	and,	in	particular,	the	luxury	hotel	industry	
evidencing	rapid	growth	this	was	a	promising	area	for	focus.		According	to	the	
United	Nations	World	Tourism	Organization,	by	2025,	China	will	be	one	of	the	two	
largest	hotel	markets	in	the	world	along	with	the	U.S9
.	
	
- In	particular,	the	buyer	for	one	of	China’s	largest	hotel	chains	-	Jin	Jiang	Hotel	Group,	
with	795	Chinese	hotels	–	had	reportedly	expressed	to	SST	the	company’s	great	
																																																								
8
	Appendix	1a:	CCE	China	Export	Project,	June	7	2013	(CCE’s	proposal	to	ESD)	
9
	http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/cndy/2012-03/17/content_14853568.htm
-	10	-	
interest	in	buying	NYS	products	to	satisfy	the	demand	of	their	sophisticated	business	
and	international	clientele.		Between	this	buyer	and	other	contacts,	SST	identified	
sales	potential	for	the	following	specific	products:	apples,	maple	syrup,	pork,	yogurt,	
cheese,	ice	cream,	and	wine.	
	
- SST	described	an	alliance	with	SinoTrans,	one	of	China’s	largest	logistic	firms	with	
industry-leading	cold	chain	logistic	capability.		They	had	also	described	existing	
working	relationships	with	US	logistics/freight	forward	firms	for	the	logistics	in	
America.	
	
SST’s	role	in	the	project	would	be	to	create	jobs	in	NYS	by	acting	as	a	direct	sales	agent	in	China	
for	New	York	State	agricultural	and	food	and	beverage	products.	By	being	a	direct	agent,	they	
believed	they	could	avoid	the	typical	trading	intermediaries	with	the	associated	costs,	delays	
and	potential	for	misaligned	incentives.	SST	proposed	to	obtain	purchase	orders	directly	from	
buyers	based	on	the	demand	they	had	started	to	build,	as	described	above,	and	they	would	do	
a	thorough	follow-up	on	leads.		They	would	then	take	full	responsibility	for	the	full	commercial	
cycle	to	ensure	timely	settlement	and	coordinate	the	cross-border	logistics,	including	cold-chain	
logistics	as	needed,	with	the	expertise	they	had	in	China	
	
In	their	proposal,	SST	offered	a	competitive	analysis	describing	many	types	of	intermediaries	
and	their	capabilities,	including	both	export	facilitators	in	the	US	and	players	in	China.		Their	
analysis	pointed	out	the	pitfalls	facing	companies	attempting	to	sell	directly	to	China	and	cited	
several	examples	of	failure.		Finally,	SST’s	proposal	concluded	that	they	possessed	significant	
competitive	advantages	over	other	companies	because:	(i)	they	were	already	building	a	direct	
sales	channel	into	China	(as	opposed	to	others	transiting	goods	through	Hong	Kong,	for	
example);	(ii)	they	were	already	establishing	direct	relationships	with	hotel	and	supermarket	
buyers;	(iii)	SST	had	already	established	partnerships	to	manage	the	cold	chain;	and	finally		(iv)	
because	of	their	expertise	in	navigating	the	regulations	and	permitting	process	in	China.	In	
summary,	SST	proposed	itself	as	a	“one-stop-shop”	for	New	York	State	agricultural	and	food	
producers	seeking	to	expand	into	the	Chinese	market	with	a	comprehensive	line	of	services:		
marketing;	sales	development;	logistics;	and	trade	finance.	
	
Although	they	made	no	binding	commitment	(nor	was	such	a	commitment	required	by	New	
York	State	or	CCE),	SST	described	the	likely	outcome	of	their	efforts	during	the	8-month	
contract	period	as	the	generation	of	at	least	3	to	5	purchase	orders	with	a	value	to	NYS	
producers	of	$500,000.00	to	$750,000.00.		After	that,	SST	expected	to	build	on	initial	successes	
to	create	a	sustained	multi-million-dollar	stream	of	income.		SST	estimated	it	would	generate	a	
per	annum	rate	of	sales	of	approximately	$10	million	by	the	end	of	the	18	months	about	60%	of	
which	would	be	gross	revenues	to	NYS	producers.		By	year	3,	it	expected	per	annum	sales	to	
reach	$50	million	and,	by	year	5,	$200	million.	
	
Some	other	aspects	mentioned	in	SST’s	proposal	and	worth	noting:
-	11	-	
- The	tariff	environment	had	been	evolving	favorably.		Since	entering	the	World	Trade	
Organization	in	2001,	China	has	gradually	relaxed	its	previously	unreasonable	
protectionist	tariffs.		This	is	still	a	work	in	progress,	with	many	pending	issues	of	US-
China	trade	still	to	be	resolved.		Nevertheless,	at	the	outset	of	this	project,	the	tariff	
of	some	products	like	dairy	had	been	significantly	reduced.	
	
- Political	trends	in	China	seemed	to	be	favorable	to	increased	trade.		Xi	Jinping	
assumed	office	as	General	Secretary	of	the	Communist	Party	of	China	in	November	
2012	and	had	created	expectations	of	economic	reforms	and	growing	bilateral	trade,	
namely,	in	a	trip	he	did	to	the	US,	still	as	Vice-President,	in	February	2012.	
	
- There	was	the	expectation	that	increased	exports	might,	in	the	future,	lead	also	to	
increases	in	Chinese	Foreign	Direct	Investment	(FDI)	in	the	US.		Basically,	the	point	is	
two-fold:		evidence	of	the	enormous	amount	of	FDI	interest	and	money	in	China10
	
and	the	fact	that,	if	exports	of	NYS	food	products	were	to	grow,	it	could	be	expected	
that,	at	some	point,	Chinese	players	might	want	to	control	the	source	through	FDI.	
	
- The	Chinese	food	retail	distribution	sector	was	growing	in	tandem	with	the	trends	
that	have	been	mentioned.		According	to	a	report	on	the	Chinese	supermarket	
industry	from	201011
,	the	total	sales	of	supermarkets	in	China’s	top	100	chain	
retailers	grew	from	$54	billion	to	$91	billion	during	the	years	of	2006	–	2009,	and	
the	number	of	supermarket	outlets	grew	from	16,025	to	23,814.		SST	proposed	to	
target	first	the	following	chains	that	seemed	to	be	more	credible,	mainly	in	terms	of	
their	cold	supply	chain	capabilities:		Wu	Mart,	Beijing	Hualian	Hypermarket	Co.,	
Lianhua	Supermarket	Holdings	Co.,	Nonggongshang	supermarket	Group,	BubuGao	
Trade	Chain	Share	Co.			
	
In	summary,	the	role	of	each	of	the	parties	in	implementing	the	project	was	as	follows:	
	
CCE:	
• Overall	project	management	and	coordination	of	the	project		
• Identifying	New	York	State	producers	with	the	potential	capacity	to	benefit	from	
participation	in	export	markets	generally	and	the	China	market	specifically;	creating	a	
database	of	those	companies	
• Helping	New	York	State	producers	understand	and	evaluate	the	market	opportunity;	
working	with	those	producers	who	choose	to	pursue	the	opportunity	to	become	export	
ready	
• Assisting	producers	in	the	development	of	desirable	business	terms	and	in	the	
successful	consummation	of	deals		
• Troubleshooting	issues	as	they	arise	
																																																								
10
	http://www.ecomonitor.com/blog/2012/02/why-chinese-fdi-remains-marginal-in-theunited-
stats/	
11
	http://www.researchchina.com/Htmls/report/2010/5989.html
-	12	-	
• Grant	administration	and	reporting	
• Evaluating	the	project	and	recommending	additional	activities	
	
SST:	
• Introducing	identified	New	York	State	producers	with	export	potential	to	the	China	
market	opportunity	
• Identifying	Chinese	buyers	for	New	York	State	producers	and	developing	sales	orders	
• Working	with	New	York	State	producers	and	CCE	to	resolve	all	permitting,	regulatory,	
labeling,	packaging	requirements	in	order	to	fufill	orders	
• Arranging	and	managing	end-to-end	logistics	from	New	York	State	producers	to	the	end	
buyer,	including	cold-chain	logistics	as	needed	
• Managing	all	other	aspects	of	the	sales	and	order	fulfillment	process	
• Following	up	initial	orders	to	increase	sales.		It	was	understood	that	SST’s	goal	was	to	
develop	a	profitable	enterprise	selling	New	York	State’s	products	in	China,	and	that	at	
the	end	of	the	8-month	contract	period	their	business	would	be	self-sustaining.		
	
	
1.3 Project	Budget	and	Timeline	
	
The	Project	budget,	to	be	expended	over	an	18-month	period,	had	the	following	components:	
	
Subcontract	to	SST	Trading:	 	 	 	 	 $	332,000	
CCE	Staff	salary,	travel,	office	supplies	and	computers:		 $200,570	
Surveys	and	data	analysis:	 	 	 	 	 $			25,000	
Equity	from	Cornell	Cooperative	Extension	(Oneida):	 $			67,272	
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 $	624,842		
	
SST’s	activities	under	the	subcontract	were	to	take	place	during	the	first	8	months	of	the	overall	
contract	period.
-	13	-
-	14	-	
Goals	of	the	project	
	
As	stated	in	Cornell	Cooperative	Extension’s	grant	proposal12
	the	goals	of	the	project	were	
threefold:	
	
1. To	develop	and	implement	a	successful	response	to	the	identified	opportunity	to	export	
differentiated	NYS	agricultural	products	to	high-end	consumer	markets	in	China.		
2. To	identify	additional	overseas	markets	for	these	products	and	develop	a	plan	to	reach	
those	markets.	
3. To	increase	the	capacity	of	the	Extension	system	to	engage	with	overseas	market	
opportunities	on	behalf	of	NYS	agricultural	producers	and	businesses.	
	
Central	to	the	project	plan	was	the	implementation	of	an	ambitious	sales	and	marketing	effort	
proposed	by,	and	to	be	spearheaded	by,	SafeSource	Trading,	the	startup	company	whose	
approach	to	New	York	State	officials	in	Albany	provided	the	initial	impetus	for	the	project.		Also,	
as	noted	in	the	proposal,	SafeSource	Trading’s	goal	for	the	project	was	to	develop	a	profitable	
commercial	enterprise	serving	New	York	state	food	producers.	
	
To	summarize	what	is	detailed	in	the	pages	that	follow,	the	project	was	unsuccessful	in	
achieving	the	ambitious	sales	goals	projected	by	SafeSource	Trading;	in	fact,	sales	generated	as	
a	result	of	the	project	after	18	months’	effort	by	both	CCE	and	SST	were	a	fraction	of	what	SST	
had	projected	they	would	achieve	in	8	months’	time.		In	this	sense,	SafeSource	Trading	also	
failed	to	achieve	its	goal	of	developing	a	profitable	business	exporting	New	York	State	food	
products.	
	
On	the	other	hand,	as	a	result	of	the	project,	the	Cornell	Cooperative	Extension	system	(and,	as	
the	funder,	New	York	State)	gained	insights	and	tools	that	should	significantly	increase	their	
capacity	to	support	the	needs	of	the	State’s	agricultural,	food	and	beverage	producers	in	the	
coming	years	as	the	export	of	differentiated	products	continues	to	become	an	increasingly	
important	component	of	the	marketing	opportunity	for	this	industry.			
	
It	must	be	acknowledged	that	the	project	did	not	achieve	its	goal	of	identifying	and	planning	for	
additional	overseas	markets,	given	the	challenges	encountered	in	trying	to	address	just	the	
Chinese	market.		However,	as	noted	in	the	pages	that	follow,	many	of	the	insights	gained	from	
the	project	can	be	fruitfully	applied	to	other	export	destinations.	
		
	 	
																																																								
12
	Appendix:	CCE	China	Export	Project,	June	7	2013
-	15	-	
Steps	implemented	to	achieve	the	goals	of	the	project,	and	results	
	
Sales	development	
During	the	first	four	months	of	the	project,	CCE	developed	lists	of	potential	exporters	and	
introduced	SST	to	more	than	fifty	producers.	SST	hired	as	its	sales	development	lead	Jeffrey	
Mills,	who	had	a	particular	interest	in	smaller,	artisanal	products,	whereas	CCE	believed	that	
the	larger	producers	and	processors	had	greater	capacity	to	benefit	from	the	export	
opportunity.		CCE’s	Project	Manager	arranged	for	meetings	with	companies	in	both	categories	
and	traveled	extensively	with	SST’s	Mills	across	New	York	State	to	introduce	the	project.		
Companies	visited	during	this	period	included	small	and	medium-sized	businesses	(cheese,	
honey,	maple	syrup,	barbecue	sauces,	meats,	wine,	spirits,	etc.)	as	well	as	larger	processors	and	
marketers	(including	Beech-Nut,	Cayuga	Milk	Ingredients,	O-AT-KA,	Saranac).	During	this	time	
SST’s	Mills	also	attended	the	Finger	Lakes	Wine	Festival;	the	Fancy	Food	Show	in	New	York	City;	
and	the	Hong	Kong	Food	Show,	prospecting	for	potential	exporters.	
	
In	November	2013,	CCE’s	Project	Manager,	along	with	the	Executive	Director	of	CCE	Lewis	
County,	participated	with	SST’s	Mills	and	their	China	lead,	Wang	Feng,	in	a	major	trade	show	–	
FHC	2013	-		in	Shanghai	and	Chengdu.	With	the	support	of	Food	Export	Northeast	funding	and	
permission	from	NYS	Department	of	Agriculture	&	Markets	to	use	the	Taste	NY	branding,	the	
project	was	able	to	rent	a	booth	and	represent	several	New	York	State	producers	with	products	
and	many	more	with	promotional	material.			
	
Recognizing	that	US-side	logistics	and	aggregation	was	going	to	be	an	important	factor	in	
facilitating	efficient	and	reliable	delivery	of	products	from	multiple	New	York	producers	to	air	or	
seaports	for	export	sales,	CCE	introduced	SST	to	capable	potential	partners	including	Baldors	in	
New	York	City	and	Regional	Access	in	the	Finger	Lakes.			
	
By	the	end	of	2013	it	was	clear	that,	despite	the	significant	investments	made	over	a	short	
period	of	time,	SafeSource	was	not	going	to	be	able	to	deliver	anything	close	to	their	projected	
sales	results.		By	that	time,	their	efforts,	with	considerable	assistance	from	CCE’s	Project	
Manager	and	other	CCE	staff,	were	almost	entirely	focused	on	establishing	final	terms	and	
fulfilling	an	initial	order	of	honey,	maple	syrup,	and	chocolate-covered	fruits/nuts	with	a	total	
value	to	the	producers	of	US$31,077	(described	in	more	detail	below).			
	
Given	SST’s	underperformance	vis-à-vis	the	expectations	they	had	generated,	the	Project	
Manager	recognized	the	need	to	make	a	choice	in	December	2013:	either	(1)	continue	to	pay	
according	to	the	terms	of	the	subcontract,	knowing	that	the	results	were	unlikely	to	change	
dramatically	in	the	remaining	three	months,	and	that	once	grant	funds	were	expended	it	was	
unlikely	that	efforts	begun	would	be	brought	to	fruition;	or	(2)	renegotiate	the	terms	of	the	
subcontract	to	keep	SafeSource	working	on	behalf	of	New	York	producers	for	an	extended	
period	without	any	increase	in	cost.		With	Empire	State	Development’s	approval,	the	Project	
Manager	renegotiated	the	terms	of	the	agreement	with	SafeSource	such	that	the	remaining	
funds	would	be	disbursed	over	a	13-month	period.
-	16	-	
The	single	order	developed	by	SafeSource	as	a	result	of	this	project	was	finally	shipped	in	
December	of	2014.		
		
Product	 Producer	 	 	 Unit	 	 Price	 	 Qty	 Total	sale	
Maple	syrup	 Lyndaker	(Lewis	Cty)	 	 250ml	glass	 $8.50	 	 1,728	 $14,688	
Honey		 Finster	(Herkimer	Cty)		 1lb	glass	 $5.30	 	 2,160	 $11,448	
Chocolate	 Tropical	Valley	(Essex	Cty)	 85g	bags	 various		 2,328	 $		4,941	
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 TOTAL:		 $31,077	
	
The	buyer	was	identified	by	SST	as	Shi	Wei	Food	Trading	Co.,	“a	new	firm	formed	by	a	team	of	
successful	Amway	executives	who	are	committed	to	marketing	New	York	State	ag	products.	
Although	the	company	is	just	developing	its	sales	channel,	the	maple,	honey,	and	chocolate	
products	are	being	sold	through	a	chain	of	health	clubs…”		
	
SST	predicted	that	significant	follow-on	orders	would	result	once	these	products	were	in	the	
market.		If	that	had	proven	to	be	the	case,	the	question	would	have	been	whether	those	sales	
could	be	profitable	to	the	producers	once	grant-funded	assistance	-	for	specially-designed	
labels	and	shipping	cases	as	well	as	air	freight	and	logistics	demanded	by	the	client	and/or	SST	-	
was	no	longer	available.	If	follow-on	orders	were	not	profitable	the	producers	could	not	be	
expected	to	respond	positively	to	them;	in	light	of	which	CCE’s	Project	Manager	recommended	
specific	price	increases	that	would	ensure	that	future	sales	would	be	of	interest	to	the	
producers.		As	of	the	date	of	this	report,	no	follow-on	orders	have	materialized	and	SST	is	no	
longer	making	any	visible	effort	in	that	direction.	
	
Among	the	producers	to	whom	CCE	introduced	SST	were	several	larger	New	York	State	meat	
processors	(the	meat	industry	is	discussed	at	length	in	an	attachment).		During	the	summer	of	
2014,	SST	hired	a	contractor,	Donald	Song,	with	significant	relevant	expertise,	having	worked	
for	the	US	Meat	Export	Federation	in	China	for	six	years.		The	Project	Manager	and	CCE	staff	
arranged	and	participated	in	numerous	meetings	and	phone	calls	with	Mr.	Song	and	potential	
suppliers,	including	detailed	discussions	of	potential	pork	sales.		CCE	staff	worked	directly	with	
the	suppliers	to	ensure	that	their	offerings	would	be	compliant	with	China’s	import	regulations.		
Despite	these	efforts,	no	sales	materialized	in	this	category.		SST’s	Haft	advised	CCE	that	he	was	
in	direct	conversations	with	a	New	York	State	beef	processor	(Champlain	Beef)	about	
developing	what	he	believed	to	be	a	substantial	opportunity	exporting	beef	hides	to	Chinese	
“end	buyers	representing	very	large	volume”.		Again,	as	of	this	writing	we	have	no	indication	
that	this	effort	has	yielded	results.	
	
Strategic	Market	targeting	and	analysis				
While	supporting	SST’s	efforts,	CCE	worked	independently	to	analyze	and	understand	the	China	
export	opportunity	for	New	York	State’s	producers,	and	initiated	consultative	discussions	with	
several	targeted	potential	exporters.		In	early	2014,	CCE	sought	and	received	permission	from	
ESD	to	reallocate	a	small	portion	-	$25,000	of	the	$332,000	initially	allocated	to	SST	-	specifically	
to	pursue	a	more	strategic	approach	to	the	market	than	SST	was	interested	in	or	apparently	
capable	of.		With	those	funds	freed	up,	CCE	hired	an	independent	consultant	–	Luis	Gato	-
-	17	-	
whose	brief	was	to	focus	on	an	identified	list	of	about	ten	larger	companies	with	substantial	
production	and	marketing	capacity.		Mr.	Gato	is	an	independent	consultant	with	20	years	of	
food	industry	experience	in	international	settings,	having	lived	and	worked	on	3	different	
continents.		Although	he	had	no	direct	experience	in	China,	he	participated	in	or	headed	up	
teams	that	explored	foreign	markets	for	previous	companies	he	had	worked	for	and,	in	some	
cases,	managed.	
	
Among	the	companies	the	Consultant	was	asked	to	focus	on,	and	the	product	categories	with	
potential	for	entry	or	growth	in	the	China	market,	were:	
	
Motts	LLP	(A	Dr.	Pepper/Snapple	Co.)	 	
Welch’s	 	 	 	 	 	
Smith	Packing			 	 	 	 	
Cayuga	Milk	Ingredients	 	 	 	
O-AT-KA	 	
Byrne	Dairy	 	 	 	 	 	
Seneca	Foods	 	 	 	 	 	
LiDestri	Foods	&	Beverage	 	 	 	
	
The	criteria	for	choosing	these	particular	companies	included:	sufficient	scale	to	suggest	the	
capacity	to	manage	the	complexity	of	the	China	market;	evidence	of	current	or	prior	export	
experience;	and	unique,	differentiated	products.			
	
Based	on	this	list	of	companies	with	significant	potential	to	benefit	from	export	growth,	The	
product	categories	of	interest	were:	
	
• Dairy	
• Processed	Fruits	&	Vegetables	
• Meat	
• Fruit	juices	and	Functional	Drinks	
• Pasta	Sauces	
• Spirits	
	
The	Consultant	was	directed	to	provide	detailed	written	analyses	of	the	China	market	
opportunity	for	these	companies	and	their	products,	including	analysis	for	each	product	of:		
	
• Chinese	demand	and	trends	
• Domestic	and	international	competitors	
• Chinese	market	channel	structure		
• Tariff	and	non-tariff	barriers,	and	
• Potential	in-market	partners.
-	18	-	
In	the	process	of	developing	the	above	analyses,	the	Project	Manager	and	the	Consultant	
identified	two	significant	special	areas	of	potential	interest	for	New	York	companies	considering	
entering	the	China	market	or	growing	their	presence,	and	the	Contractor	developed	in-depth	
analyses	of	the	following	specific	aspects	of	the	Chinese	food	and	beverage	market	
opportunity:	
	
• Private	Label		
• Online	
	
All	the	above	market	research	is	documented	in	analyses	below	and	attached	to	this	report.	
	
Database	
CCE	identified	a	variety	of	primary	and	secondary	sources	of	detailed	information	about	
potential	exporting	companies	in	the	agriculture,	food	and	beverage	industries	in	New	York	
State.		Working	with	the	Consultant,	these	data	sources	were	merged,	analyzed	and	organized	
to	create	a	comprehensive	database	of	sector	businesses	as	well	as	a	selected	subset	of	
companies	believed	to	have	the	greatest	potential	to	successfully	grow	in	export	markets.		The	
resulting	databases	are	included	as	attachments	to	this	report,	along	with	a	detailed	discussion	
of	the	methodology	used	in	creating	the	databases	and	some	analysis	of	their	contents.	
	
Survey	
With	the	support	of	Cornell’s	Survey	Research	Institute	and	the	Consultant,	CCE	fielded	a	survey	
to	a	wide	range	of	agriculture,	food	and	beverage	sector	businesses.		The	results	of	that	survey	
provided	insights	into	the	experience,	interest,	and	perceived	needs	of	those	businesses	with	
regard	to	potential	export	opportunities.		CCE’s	analysis	of	those	results	also	suggested	some	
specific	steps	that	New	York	State	should	consider	taking	in	order	to	support	the	growth	of	
exports	in	these	sectors.		The	results	of	the	survey,	including	a	detailed	analysis	and	a	summary	
report	are	included	in	the	attachments	to	this	report.	
	
Outreach	
The	Project	Manager	and	the	Consultant	presented	the	relevant	portions	of	the	detailed	market	
analyses	described	above	directly	to	senior	management	at	the	targeted	companies,	along	with	
recommended	preliminary	market	entry	steps.		The	Project	Manager	presented	the	results	of	
the	project	to	date	at	the	2014	Cornell	Strategic	Marketing	Conference	in	November	2014.		A	
presentation	of	the	results	of	the	project	and	recommendations	was	made	to	Empire	State	
Development	and	Cornell	government	affairs	staff	in	March	of	2015.		The	July	and	August	2015	
issues	of	Cornell’s	Smart	Marketing	newsletter	were	devoted	to	articles	written	by	the	Project	
Manager	about	the	project	–	the	first	being	a	summary	of	the	results	and	the	second	identifying	
key	resources	for	prospective	exporters.		Copies	of	these	outreach	materials	are	attached.
-	19	-	
Overall	Market	Analysis	
(Appendix	6a)	
	
This	analysis	takes	a	high-level	view	of	the	overall	Chinese	market	for	New	York’s	agricultural,	
food	and	beverage	products,	including	basic	demand	size,	characteristics,	drivers	and	trends.		
	
Key	findings:	
	
• China’s	“upper	middle	class”	($16k	to	$34k/year	income)	will	represent	54%	of	the	total	
urban	households	in	2022,	increasing	dramatically	from	the	current	14%.		“Affluent”	
households	($34k+)	will	go	from	3%	to	9%.		With	this,	it	is	expected	that	the	growth	of	
private	consumption	will	be	of	around	10.3%	per	year	from	2012	on	for	the	next	ten	
years,	or	multiplying	by	a	factor	of	2.6.	
	
• According	to	China’s	census13
,	at	the	time,	the	urban	population	represented	about	712	
million	people.		This	meant	that	the	upper	middle	class	and	affluent	should	increase	by	
anywhere	from	400	mllion	to	500	million	by	2022	if	the	rate	of	increase14
	of	urban	
areas	was	to	be	maintained.	
	
• Rise	in	income	levels	,	and	related	changes	in	consumption	patterns,	seemed	to	indicate	
that	milk	(dairy)	and	overall	meat/poultry	would	likely	be	the	fastest	moving	segments.	
Milk	and	meat	consumption	increases	correlate	with	increased	food	safety	concerns.	
Government	pressure	and	natural	improvement	of	people’s	standard	of	living	should	
also	drive	increased	consumption	of	grains,	vegetables,	and	fruits.	
	
• Health	and	wellness	awareness	and	demand	are	significant	drivers	of	Chinese	demand	
and	certainly	one	would	expect	growing	demand	for	fortified/functional	products	
(mainly	relevant	for	dairy-based	and	other	processed	beverages).	
	
This	analysis	also	looks	at	broad	market	characteristics	that	must	be	understood	by	New	York	
State	companies	approaching	the	market.		The	Chinese	food	distribution	market	is	immature	
relative	to	developed	Western	countries,	and	highly	fragmented	as	shown	in	the	chart	below.		
This	makes	it	more	challenging	to	penetrate	effectively	in	China.		Paradoxically,	while	the	total	
market	opportunity	is	large,	in	order	to	achieve	scale	a	food/beverage	producer	would	need	to	
penetrate	a	large	number	of	chains	and	small	mom-and-pop	retailers.			
																																																								
13
	"Census:	Population	hits	1.37b".	Europe.chinadaily.com.cn.	2011-04-29.	Retrieved	2014-02-
16	
14
	“Health	and	Wellness	Trends	in	China”	–	February	2011,	Agriculture	and	Food	Canada,	
International	Markets	Bureau	(Government	of	Canada)
-	20	-	
					 	
	
The	regulatory	environment	is	also	a	major	challenge.		The	chart	below	briefly	summarizes	
the	complicated	and	ineffective	hierarchical	chain	that	is	involved	in	the	process.
-	21	-	
The	Distribution	Channel	
(Appendix	6b)	
	
This	provides	a	more	detailed	analysis	of	Chinese	food	and	beverage	distribution,	looking	
specifically	at	three	channel	components:	the	Food	Service,	Retail	and	Industrial	distribution	
channels.		The	goal	was	to	understand	where	and	how	food	and	beverage	products	were	
getting	to	consumers	in	China	and	who	were	the	key	players.	
	
Key	findings:	
	
1. 	Food	Service:	
• Strong	growth,	recent	slowdown:		This	sector	grew	at	an	average	9.2%	from	2005	to	
2010.		Future	growth	was	expected	to	be	of	8.2%	per	year	according	to	one	source15
.	
• Factors	driving	growth	in	the	food	service	sector16
:	
• Robust	growth	in	the	economy	
• increasing	urbanization,	alongside	growth	in	the	middle-class	its	income	
• Growth	in	the	number	of	single	member	households		
• Growth	in	the	number	of	working	women	
• Increasing	rates	of	travel/tourism	in	China.	
• Growth	in	the	Food	Service	slowed	slightly	in	2012,	largely	owing	to	the	economic	
downturn	in	China,	ongoing	global	economic	instability,	and	the	government’s	campaign	
to	crack	down	on	corruption17
.	
• Strong	trend:	The	sector	was	valued	at	over	$333	Billion	in	201018
.	This	is	about	half	of	
that	of	the	U.S.18
	for	a	country	that	is	more	than	4	times	as	large	in	population.		Another	
way	to	look	at	it	is	that	this	means	each	person	spent	on	average	per	year	$244	in	Food	
Service	providers,	or	5%	to	6%	of	their	disposable	income.		This	is	a	rate	similar	to	that	
of	most	countries	(5%	in	the	US).		So	one	could	expect	Food	Service	to	continue	growing	
at	a	rate	closer	to	that	of	disposable	income	per	capita.		McKinsey19
	predicted	the	
growth	of	private	consumption	(not	necessarily	disposable	income)	at	10.3%	so	this	was	
close	to	the	8.2%	growth	predicted	by	this	report18
.	
• Fragmented	Market:	There	were	about	5.9	million	food	service	outlets	in	China	in	2010.		
Of	these,	98%	were	independently	operated,	suggesting	that	there	were	100,000	
outlets	belonging	to	restaurant	chains.	Fast	food	represented	21%	of	outlets	while	Full-
																																																								
15
	“Foodservice	Profile	China”,	February	2012,	International	Markets	Bureau,	Agriculture	and	
Agri-Food	Canada,	Government	of	Canada	http://www.ats-sea.agr.gc.ca/asi/6114-eng.htm	
16
	“Chinese	Foodservice:		the	future	of	Foodservice	in	China	2016”,	Nov	12	2012,	PR	Newswire,	
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/chinese-foodservice-the-future-of-foodservice-in-
china-to-2016-178897981.html	
17
	“Consumer	Foodservice	in	China”,	Sep	2013,	Euromonitor,	
http://www.euromonitor.com/consumer-foodservice-in-china/report	
18
	National	Bureau	of	statistics	of	China	as	Cited	by	www.trading.com,	January	14,	
http://www.tradingeconomics.com/china/disposable-personal-income	
19
	“Mapping	China’s	middle	class”	McKinsey	Quarterly,	June	2013,	Mckinsey&Company
-	22	-	
Service	represented	74%.	The	fastest	growing	sector	was	the	home	delivery/takeaway	
sector.		
	
2. 	Retail:	
	
• China	was	expected	to	grow	at	a	14%	rate	until	2016	and	at	an	overall	cagr	of	16%	until	
2022.20
		China	should	be	passing	the	U.S.	as	the	largest	retail	market	in	the	world	by	
2016	and	it	should	already	be	the	largest	grocery	market	in	the	world.	
• The	largest	opportunity	seemed	to	be	the	e-commerce	sector	which	grew	65%	in	2012	
and	already	represents	6.3%	of	total	sales23
.	
• This	is	still	a	fragmented	market	with	many	players	and	where	the	largest	have	a	
relatively	small	share.	
• Small	stores	(convenience	like)	are	gaining	popularity.	
• The	market	is	trending	to	maturity	while	maintaining	strong	growth.		All	major	formats	
exist	in	China.		Management	and	promotional	activity	resemble	that	of	many	mature	
markets21
.	
• Hypermarkets	will	continue	to	grow	and	dominate	but	urbanization	and	convenience	
beget	the	very	fast	growth	of	convenience	stores23
.	
• Key	consumer	trends	affecting	Retail:	
• Convenience:		impacting	the	growth	of	convenience	and	local	stores	and	also	the	
growth	of	small	packaging	sizes	and	ready	meals	
• Health	and	Wellness	
• High-quality	baby	products	are	a	particularly	important	retail	category	
	
3. Industrial:			
	
The	industrial	sector	are	purchasers	of	commodity	food	products,	generally	as	ingredients	
for	use	in	final	products	after	further	processing.	In	this	part	of	the	report	we	highlight	the	
main	food	processing	industries,	their	recent	performance,	and	their	interest	as	potential	
customers	of	New	York’s	food	products.		
	
• China	is	the	global	industrial	leader,	with	a	labor	force	of	815	million	workers	and	a	
leadership	position	in	the	manufacture	of	industrial	and	consumer	products.	22
In	2010,	
																																																								
20
	“Retail	in	China	–	A	panel	discussion	of	the	potential	within	the	Chinese	retail	industry”,	2013,	
The	Economist,	Intelligence	Unit.		This	was	a	panel	discussion	that	had	the	following	people:		
Jon	Copestake,	chief	Retail	and	Consumer	Goods	Analyst	of	The	Economist,	Dr.	Liu	Qian,	Deputy	
Director	of	the	Chinese	Forecasting	service	of	The	Economist,	Tino	Zeiske,	VP	of	International	
Affairs	of	Asia	Pacific	at	Metro	Group	and	Bernie	Stefan,	Head	of	Strategy	&	Business	
Development	in	the	China	region	for	Nestle.	
21
	“Consumer	and	Retail	Trends	in	China”,	January	2013,	International	Markets	Bureau,	
Agriculture	and	Agri-Food	Canada,	Government	of	Canada	
22
	“Foodservice	Profile	China”,	February	2012,	International	Markets	Bureau,	Agriculture	and	
Agri-Food	Canada,	Government	of	Canada	http://www.ats-sea.agr.gc.ca/asi/6114-eng.htm
-	23	-	
China’s	industrial	output	exceeded	that	of	the	U.S.	marginally,	but	this	had	since	been	
consolidated	into	a	more	than	20%	lead,	with	the	gap	continuing	to	widen23
.	
• Calculations	based	on	estimates	in	the	CIA's	World	Factbook	indicated	that,	in	2012,	the	
value	of	China's	industrial	production	was	$3.7	trillion	compared	to	$2.9	trillion	for	the	
U.S.	–	which	would	mean	China's	industrial	production	was	126%	that	of	the	U.S.	level24
.		
	
• Chinese	food	manufacturing	sector	had	gross	sales	of	USD	$1.1	trillion	and	grew	28%	vs	
2011	and	301%	vs	2005,	although	some	of	this	had	to	do	with	currency	fluctuations.	
	
• Growing	Industrial	sectors	relevant	to	U.S.	exports25
:	
• Frozen	Food,	in	particular,	quick	frozen	flour-based,	like	dumplings	
• Prepared	Meats	
• Snack	foods	and	Chocolate	candy	
• Dairy,	particularly	UHT	milk,	flavored	milk	drinks,	cheese,	yogurt,	milk	powder	
and	whey	
• Healthy	foods	in	general	
• Baby	food	
• Tree	nuts	and	dried	fruits	
	
The	detailed	report	attached	includes	an	explanation	of	the	flow	of	distribution	from	
manufacturer	to	consumer,	as	well	as	some	recommendations	for	U.S.	companies	taken	from	
several	relevant	sources29
,	26
:	
- Exhibitions	can	be	a	cost	effective	approach	to	understanding	the	market	and	
meeting	agents/importers.			
- Chinese	business	culture	matters.		The	most	distinctive	aspect	of	Chinese	business	
culture	is	the	need	to	cultivate	guanxi	or	relationships.	
- Don’t	necessarily	expect	dramatic	or	rapid	success.		
- Suppliers	of	perishable	products	need	to	be	alert	to	the	cold	chain	capabilities	of	
distributors,	because	the	infrastructure	is	uneven.	
- Protect	your	intellectual	property	by	registering	immediately	your	patents,	
trademarks,	labels,	etc.	in	China.	(and	in	the	U.S.)	
- “The	most	important	advice	for	U.S.	suppliers	before	entering	the	China	market	is	to	
partner	with	a	good	distributor”.	Business	culture	is	heavily	dependent	on	personal	
relationships.		Face-to-face	contact	plays	a	key	role	in	ensuring	reliability	in	
																																																								
23
	“Key	trends	in	Globalization	–	China	has	taken	over		the	US	to	become	the	world’s	largest	
industrial	producer”,	Sep	3	2013,	John	Ross,	Senior	Fellow	at	Chonyang	Institute	for	financial	
Studies,	Renmin	University	of	China	
	
24
	“Key	trends	in	Globalization	–	China	has	taken	over		the	US	to	become	the	world’s	largest	
industrial	producer”,	Sep	3	2013,	John	Ross,	Senior	Fellow	at	Chonyang	Institute	for	financial	
Studies,	Renmin	University	of	China	
25
	“China	Food	Manufacturing	Annual	Report”,	Feb	4,	2013,	USDA	GAIN	
26
	“China,	Peoples	Republic	of,	HRI	Food	service	Sector	Annual	Report	2009,	USDA	GAIN
-	24	-	
situations	where	legal	structure	and	contract	enforcement	are	vague.		Selecting	
suitable	distributors	requires	effort	and	cooperation	on	both	sides.		U.S.	suppliers	
should	work	to	develop	an	understanding	of	target	markets	within	China	and	clearly	
define	their	market	expectations	for	their	local	distributor.
-	25	-	
Product	Category	Analyses	
	
As	noted	above,	the	Consultant	was	directed	to	provide	detailed	written	analyses	of	the	China	
market	opportunity	for	a	short	list	of	New	York	State	companies	and	their	products,	including	
the	following	analyses	for	each	of	those	products:		
	
• Chinese	demand	and	trends	
• Domestic	and	international	competitors	
• Chinese	market	channel	structure		
• Tariff	and	non-tariff	barriers,	and	
• Potential	in-market	partners.			
	
Following	are	summaries	the	information	contained	in	the	detailed	category	reports	(see	
Appendices),	including	some	highlights	as	follows:	
		
• Processed	Fruits	and	Vegetables	is	a	mature	and	highly	competitive	market	in	China	
with	enough	supply,	but	it	does	have	value-added	niches	worth	exploring	(and	most	
niches	in	China	are	big	enough)	
• Pasta	Sauce	–	still	a	small	market	but	American	product	has	good	acceptance,	and	in	
fact	LiDestri’s	product	can	already	be	found	in	China	although	not	directly	sold	by	them,	
suggesting	margin/profit	for	a	direct	relationship	
• Spirits	–	American	products	have	not	been	very	well	valued	with	the	exception	of	high-
end	branded	spirits,	yet	Chinese	have	been	importing	more	and	more	from	the	U.S.	
	
Dairy	products	
(Appendix	6c)	
	
This	research	was	provided	to:	
- O-AT-KA	Milk	Products	
- Cayuga	Milk	Ingredients	
- Byrne	Dairy	
	
Key	findings:	
• Dairy	products	are	an	enormous	market	in	China	and	was	growing:	35	million	metric	
tons	(MT),	growing	6%/year.			
• China	total	imports	of	Dairy	products	had	been	increasing	by	34%/year	
• Imported	products	offer	safety	and	diversity.		Safety	seemed	extremely	important,	
especially	after	a	couple	of	large	milk	adulteration	scandals.		Imported	means	safety	for	
the	Chinese	consumer.	
• All	dairy	products	seem	to	be	a	good	prospect.		Milk	powder	and	other	higher-end	milk	
products	seemed	to	be	particularly	attractive.		Non-fat	dry	milk,	for	instance,	a	290,000	
MT	market	was	growing	24%/year.	
• There	seemed	to	be	an	opportunity	worth	exploring	for	NYS	products.
-	26	-	
• Selling	to	China	is	an	intricate	process	that	requires	time	for	several	procedures	to	
happen.	According	to	Dezan	Shira	&	Associates27
,	first-time	product	approval	can	take	
up	to	8	months.	
	
Processed	fruits	&	vegetables	
	(Appendix	6d)	
	
This	research	was	provided	to:	
- Seneca	Foods	
	
Key	findings:	
	
• The	total	market	of	fruits	and	vegetables	(including	fresh)	in	China	was	worth	over	$50	
billion	and	was	projected	to	grow	between	4%	and	6%	per	year	(similar	to	recent	growth	
rates)	in	the	next	few	years,	with	a	bit	faster	growth	of	fruits.		The	processed	fruits	and	
vegetables	industry	has	been	growing	at	an	astonishing	32%	/	year.		Consumption	of	
processed	produce	has	been	increasing	with	urbanization,	to	the	detriment	of	fresh.		
This	trend	was	expected	to	stay	in	force.		
	
• However,	internal	production	had	matched	demand.		This	is	a	widely	commoditized	
industry,	most	of	it	requiring	significant	levels	of	labor	and	a	relatively	simple	
technology.		China	is,	therefore,	a	competitive	producer,	self-sufficient	and	a	net	
exporter	with	many	foreign	companies	producing	in	mainland	China	attracted	by	the	
tremendous	growth	of	domestic	consumption	and	by	this	source	for	international	
competitiveness.	
	
• While	mass	consumption	might	not	be	the	most	obvious	prospect,	good	opportunities	
might	reside	in	some	specific	products	where	quality	or	volume	driven	efficiencies	might	
have	rendered	the	US	competitive	(like	perhaps	some	raisins)	or	in	more	value-added	
products,	possibly	in	the	frozen	segment	or	in	semi-prepared	meals	that,	being	value-
added	products,	could	become	an	opportunity.		There	is	a	growing	market	for	these	
(and	commodities	too).			
	
• Given	a	competitive	product/producer,	it	could	make	sense	to	explore	the	opportunity	
for	exports.	
	
Meat	
(Appendix	6e)	
	
This	research	was	provided	to:	
- Smith	Packing	
																																																								
27
	“Guide	to	the	Shanghai	Free	Trade	Zone”,	China	Briefing,	Issue	142,	March	2014,	by	Dezan	
Shira	&	Associates
-	27	-	
	
Key	Findings:	
	
• Chinese	consumed	on	average	of	about	156g	per	day	of	animal	protein,	which	is	above	
the	World	Health	Organization	Requirements28
,29
.	However,	it	would	seem	reasonable	
to	expect	a	big	difference	in	the	consumption	pattern	between	people	of	more	or	less	
income.		Certainly	one	would	expect	the	growth	of	disposable	income,	and	hence	of	the	
middle	class,	to	probably	increase	the	per	capita	consumption	of	all	meat	groups	but	
particularly	that	of	beef.	For	instance,	the	average	American	consumes	252g/day	of	
animal	protein,	70g	of	beef	vs.	11	by	the	Chinese30
,31
.	
	
• In	fact,	the	numbers	above	show	that,	eventually,	all	meat	groups	should	grow	at	least	
at	low	single	digits,	but	more	so	beef	and	lamb/mutton.		Poultry	was	at	the	time	the	
only	meat	showing	decreasing	consumption,	which	is	attributed	to	the	H7N9	virus	
outbreak.	
	
• Beef	seemed	a	great	prospect	for	the	US	if	and	when	the	existing	ban	was	to	be	lifted.		
In	fact,	the	US	has	the	reputation	for	great	beef,	which	appeals	to	the	up	and	coming	
aspiring	higher	classes	in	China.		The	Chinese	beef	market	is,	in	its	own	right,	very	large	
and	is	the	sector	of	the	meat	market	showing	the	most	promising	growth.	
	
• China	had	been	importing	more	pork	from	the	US	than	any	other	country	and	Chinese	
imports	are	estimated	to	increase.		The	US	had,	however,	been	facing	growing	
competition	from	Germany,	the	#2	supplier.		China	was	also	importing	a	lot	of	pork	
offal;	again,	the	US	has	been	a	key	supplier.	
	
• Poultry	had	been	also	a	main	export	from	the	US	to	China.		Prices	and	margins	were,	
however,	very	small	and	the	Chinese	had	been	presenting	dumping	complaints	and	
pushing	for	increased	duties	on	US	poultry.		Note:		there	was	(at	least	at	the	time)	a	ban	
on	poultry	to	be	sold	from	NYS.	
	
• Lamb/Mutton	seemed	less	of	an	opportunity.		Most	of	it	is	banned	and	no	word	of	this	
changing.	
	
																																																								
28
	“Energy	and	protein	requirements,	WHO	Technical	Report	Series	724”,	1985,	Food	and	
Agriculture	Organization/	World	Health	Organization/	United	Nations	University,	Geneva,	WHO	
29
	“Protein	and	Amino	Acid	Requirements	in	Human	Nutrition,	WHO	Technical	Report	Series	
935”,	2002,	Geneva,	World	Health	Organization	
30
	http://www.nationalchickencouncil.org/about-the-industry/statistics/per-capita-
consumption-of-poultry-and-livestock-1965-to-estimated-2012-in-pounds/	
31
	http://www.beefusa.org/udocs/annualpercapitaconsumption-meat-boneless491.pdf
-	28	-	
• In	conclusion,	pork	(due	to	its	volume)	and	beef	(to	its	margins,	potential	growth	and	US	
reputation)	seemed	to	be	the	best	opportunities	to	pursue.		While,	at	least	at	the	time,	
China	had	a	ban	on	US	beef	(allegedly	due	to	the	“mad	cow	disease”),	this	ban	was	
expected	to	be	lifted	as	early	as	2015.		In	any	case,	while	this	opportunity	was	not	to	
clear	up	in	mainland	China,	sales	to	Honk	Kong	could	be	pursued.			
	
• NYS	had	a	smaller	percentage	of	livestock32
,33
,34
	to	the	total	U.S.	than	that	of	its	
population	which	means	it	probably	produces	less	than	its	consumption.		Nonetheless,	
specific	slaughterhouses	and,	especially,	aggregators,	might	have	processing	and/or	
sales	capacity	to	export	to	China.	
	
Fruit	juices	&	functional	drinks	(including	dairy-based	drinks)	
(Appendix	6f)	
	
This	research	was	provided	to:	
- O-AT-KA	Milk	Products	
- Cayuga	Milk	Ingredients	
- Byrne	Dairy	
- Welch’s	
- Mott’s	
- LiDestri	Foods	
	
Key	findings:	
	
• The	fruit	juice	market	was	about	22	million	metric	tons,	growing	at	about	15%	per	year	
and	expected	to	keep	growing	at	a	rate	between	8%	and	10%.	
	
• China	was	projected	to	become	the	world’s	largest	beverage	market	by	2015	and	this	
could	be	just	the	beginning	as	China’s	per	capita	consumption	is	extremely	small	and	
should	grow	tremendously	with	middle-class	expansion.	
	
• Main	opportunities	seemed	to	be	in	specialty,	functional,	fortified,	protein,	energy	
drinks,	etc.		This	was	particularly	validated	when	seen	in	the	light	of	the	growing	trend	
for	diversity	identified	earlier.		
	
• The	U.S.	has	been	a	net	importer	of	Juices	and	imports	were	growing	slightly	faster	than	
exports	(5%	vs.	4%).		China	is	the	main	supplier	of	the	U.S.	when	it	comes	to	fruit	juices,	
with	39%	of	the	total	volume	but	only	30%	of	the	total	value.		However,	the	US	exports	
to	China	value-added	products	and	imports	less	value-added	products	or	commodities.		
																																																								
32
	http://www.meatami.com/ht/d/sp/i/47465/pid/47465	
33
	http://www.cattlerange.com/cattle-graphs/all-cattle-numbers.html	
34
	http://www.stuffaboutstates.com/agriculture/livestock/chicken_eggs.htm
-	29	-	
	
• There	seemed	to	be	an	opportunity	worth	exploring	for	NYS	products,	particularly	for	
value-added	items.	
	
Pasta	Sauces	
(Appendix	6g)	
	
This	research	was	provided	to:	
- LiDestri	Foods:	
	
Key	findings:	
	
Note:	There	was	not	nearly	as	much	information	on	this	category	as	there	was	in	any	other	
studied.		Furthermore,	this	category	does	not	yet	have	the	same	importance	in	China	as	it	does	
in	the	U.S.		This	produces	some	challenges	forthe	analysis	such	as	the	fact	not	all	retailers	
researched	for	the	sampling	of	products	showed	a	category	for	“Pasta	Sauces”,	and	these	
products	were	sometimes	found	under	broader	aggregates.		We	did	find,	however,	the	market	
of	Sauces	and	Dressings	was	growing	about	9.5%/year	in	the	period	from	2011	to	2013.	
	
• China	has	been	self-sufficient	in	the	category,	but	is	importing	more	and	more.		China	
was	exporting	more	than	it	was	importing	under	the	aggregate	“tomato	ketchup	and	
other	tomato	sauces”.		Yet	it	was	importing	more	and	more	and	it	seemed	to	be	
importing	more	value-added	products,	possibly	mostly	from	the	U.S.	Nonetheless,	these	
imports	are	still	relatively	small	totaling	about	$4M	of	tomato	based	sauces	in	2011;	
these	imports	might	be	tied	to	Quick	Service	Restaurant	(QSR)	chains	from	the	U.S.	
(imposing	suppliers	on	their	Chinese	affiliates).	
	
• This	is	not	a	huge	market	but	could	be	an	emerging	one.		The	U.S.	has	been	able	to	
penetrate	it	so	far.		It	is	likely	that	domestic	production	might	become	more	and	more	
competitive	but	opportunities	may	exist	in	either	commoditized	products	where	the	
U.S.	has	very	efficient	cost/automation	processes	or	in	more	value-added,	branded	or	
otherwise	differentiated	products	appealing	to	an	aspirational	population.	
	
Spirits	
(Appendix	6h)	
	
This	research	was	provided	to:	
- LiDestri	foods:	
	
Key	findings:	
	
• China	has	been,	and	is,	by	far,	the	largest	market	for	alcoholic	beverages	in	the	world.		
Spirits	represent	about	8%	of	that	market	with	about	1.3	Billion	gallons,	and
-	30	-	
consumption	has	been	growing	at	2%	per	year	and	is	expected	to	ramp	up	to	
somewhere	between	3.5%	and	8%	a	year.	
	
• Baiju,	the	national	drink,	a	distilled	spirit	with	a	50%-60%	or	more	alcohol	content,	
dominates	with	90%+	of	sales.	
	
• Imports	of	spirits	had	been	rising	at	a	modest	4%	per	year.	
	
• The	US	exports	of	spirits	to	China	had	been	growing	–	up	21%	in	2014.		American	
whiskey	represented	about	half	of	those	exports,	with	those	exports		also	growing	21%.		
On	the	other	hand,	the	overall	imports	of	whiskeys	in	China	had	actually	been	
decreasing,	likely	due	to	the	government	crackdown	on	lavish	public	expenses	and	
banquets	as	part	of	its	anti-corruption	efforts.	
	
• The	Chinese	also	were	also	exporting	more	spirits	than	they	were	importing	and	the	
average	price	of	exports	was	higher	than	that	of	imports.		The	U.S.	was	exporting	to	
China	at	a	lower	price,	on	average,	than	that	of	the	overall	Chinese	imports.	
	
• Total	U.S.	exports	of	spirits	to	China	represented	only	about	$12M	in	2014,	less	than	1%	
of	the	industry’s	overall	exports.		The	growth	was	interesting	but	it	may	not	be	easy	to	
find	the	customers	for	American-made	spirits.	
	
• Besides	American	Whiskey,	U.S.	key	exports	to	China	had	been	rum	and	brandy.
-	31	-	
Proposed	market	entry	strategies	
	
For	each	of	the	above-mentioned	companies,	the	Consultant,	under	the	guidance	of	the	Project	
Manager,	developed	a	customized	market	analysis	and	preliminary	recommendations	for	
market	entry.		Each	report	contained	the	following	components:	
	
A	competitive	landscape	overview	in	which	the	main	players/competitors	in	the	relevant	
sector	are	identified	and	described.	
	
A	review	of	existing	product	offerings	in	the	category.	(Since	the	online	sector	in	China	is	very	
well	developed	we	were	able	to	use	Chinese	internet	sites	to	find	a	large	sample	of	
representative	products.		We	then	summarized	a	few	things	meant	to	help	companies	adapt	
their	product	offerings	to	the	Chinese	market:			
	
• main	product	claims	on	the	label	
• percentage	of	imported	versus	domestic	products	
• market	share	of	each	brand	based	on	the	sample	
• packaging:		percentage	per	type	(e.g.	cans,	glass,	plastic,	tetra	pack,	other)	
• container	size:		percentage	per	size	
	
A	recommendation	for	Next	Steps.	
	
A	profile	of	Chinese	distributors	we	were	able	to	identify	as	potentially	appropriate	partners	
for	the	New	York	State	exporter.		Each	profile	contained	some	imagery	about	the	distributor	
plus	the	following	information:	
	
• Which	of	the	relevant	functions	they	perform:		import/customs’	handling,	sales,	
marketing	and	logistics	management,	it	being	we	only	identified	companies	that	do	at	
least	import/customs	and	sales.	
• Perceived	size	(small,	medium,	large).	
• What	were	the	product	categories	they	were	already	representing	with	an	indication	of	
how	close	they	were	to	the	lines	of	products	that	the	NYS	companies	were	trying	to	sell	
(see	criteria	on	next	page).	
• Which	regions	of	China	they	had	offices	in	and	covered.	
• Whether	or	not	they	were	currently	importing	F&B	products	(we	only	selected	F&B	
distributors	of	course)	from	the	U.S.	and	or	other	developed	countries	such	as	Japan	or	
the	European	Union	countries.		We	only	selected	companies	that	were	already	doing	at	
least	one	of	these	countries.	
• Which	channels	they	catered	to:		Industrial,	Retail,	Food	Service,	On-line	retail.	
• Whether	or	not	we	were	able	to	identify	a	specific	contact	at	the	company	or	we	only	
had	a	general	contact	for	the	firm.	
• Some	general	comments	about	the	distributor.
-	32	-	
• A	subjective	evaluation	of	how	good	a	fit	they	seemed	to	be	for	the	company	we	were	
recommending	them	for.	
	
The	criteria	we	used	for	the	potential	partners	we	selected	was	as	follows:	
	
- What	kind	of	products	the	exporting	company	was	trying	to	sell,	namely	branded	or	
Private	Label,	and	the	specific	category.	
- Whether	the	exporting	company’s	products	were	a	better	fit	for	Retail	and	Food	
Service	and	what	was	the	specific	expertise	of	the	distributor.	
- There	was	also	a	focus	on	players	in	the	Central	East	and	South	East	regions	of	China	
where	imported	foods	and	high-end	retail	chains	are	more	prevalent	and	likely	to	
carry	imported	products.	
- There	was	also	a	preference	for	firms	already	importing	from	the	US	or	Europe.		
Ideally,	if	the	project	was	to	continue,	after	a	deeper	evaluation,	we	would	want	to	
ask	for	U.S.	(or	European)	references.	
- We	specifically	chose	some	companies	that	already	carried	the	line	of	products	the	
exporting	company	produces	as	well	as	others	that	we	could	not	find	an	evidence	of	
doing	so.	This	was	done	in	order	to	provide	the	NYS	company	with	options	of	
distributors	that	do	not	carry	very	similar	products	because	some	companies	simply	
don’t	want	to	work	with	distributors	that	might	carry	products	that	compete	with	
theirs,	although	many	end	up	having	to	do	so	because	those	distributors	usually	
have	the	better	relationships.		In	any	case,	we	always	also	provided	distributors	that	
were	able	to	get	to	the	desired	customer	types.		For	instance,	if	a	company	was	
trying	to	sell	fruit	juices	to	the	Food	Service	Industry,	we	might	have	given	them	
distributors	that	were	selling	coffee	or	alcoholic	beverages	to	that	channel	but	not	
fruit	juices	while	we	also	provided	distributors	that	were	already	carrying	fruit	juices	
(although	we	tried	them	not	to	be	quite	the	same	type).	
	
The	following	reports	were	provided	to	our	contacts	at	the	targeted	companies:	
	
- O-AT-KA:		NYFood2China-PartII.b-Distributors-O-AT-KA-VF.pdf;	40	pages,	272	
products	sampled,	10	potential	distributors	identified:		Brightview,	EGDIS,	Goodwell,	
Jebsen,	Longchi,	Longmore,	Pinlive,	Shangai	Nanpu,	Shenzhen	Yifan,	Sunny	Life.	
- Byrne	Dairy:		NYFood2China-PartII.b-Distributors-ByrneD-VF.pdf;	40	pages,	272	
products	sampled	(same	as	for	O-at-ka;	they	are	in	the	same	sector),	10	potential	
distributors	identified:		Citures,	Dah	Chong,	EGDIS,	Goodwell,	GuangDong	
Foodstuffs,	GuangDong	Zhontian,	Longchi,	Shenzhen	Yifan,	Sunny	Life,	wide	Career.	
- Seneca	Foods:		NYFood2China-PartII.b-Distributors-SenecaF-VF.pdf;	29	pages,	111	
products	sampled,	8	potential	distributors	identified:		Beijing	Ganghu,	Dah	Chong,	
Longchi,	Pinlive,	Shanghai	Foodstuffs,	Shanghai	Kingfoods,	Shanghai	Tak	Kwong,	
Shenzhen	Yifan.	
- Welch’s:		NYFood2China-PartII.b-Distributors-Welchs-VF.pdf;	48	pages,	563	products	
sampled,	10	potential	distributors	identified:		Assure,	Citures,	EGDIS,	Finigate,
-	33	-	
GuangDong	Foodstuffs,	GuangDong	Zhontian,	Longchi,	Shanghai	Nanpu,	Sunlight	
Coffee,	Sunny	Life.	
- Mott’s	(Dr.	Pepper/Snapple):		NYFood2China-PartII.b-Distributors-Motts-VF.pdf;	48	
pages,	563	products	sampled	(same	as	Welch’s,	they	are	in	the	same	sector),	10	
potential	distributors	identified:		EDGIS,	Finigate,	GuangDong	Foodstuffs,	Longchi,	
Pinlive,	Shanghai	Gourmand,	Shanghai	Kingfoods,	Sunlight	Coffee,	Sunny	Life,	Wide	
Career.	
- Smith	Packing:		NYFood2China-PartII.b-Distributors-SmithP-VF.pdf;	26	pages,	92	
products	sampled,	7	potential	distributors	identified:		Brightview,	Dah	Chong,	
GuangDong	Foodstuffs,	Heng	Tai,	Shanghai	Foodstuffs,	Shanghai	Golden	Fields,	
Wilson	foods.	
- LiDestri	Foods:			
o For	Fruit	Juices:	NYFood2China-PartII.b-Distributors-LiDestriFJ-VF.pdf;	48	pages,	
563	products	sampled	(same	as	Welch’s	and	Mott’s,	they	are	in	the	same	
sector),	10	potential	distributors	identified:		Beijing	Just	Business,	EDGIS,	
Finigate,	GuangDong	Foodstuffs,	Longchi,	Shanghai	Foodstuffs,	Shanghai	Nanpu,	
Sunlight	Coffee,	Sunny	Life,	Wide	Career.	
o For	Pasta	Sauces:	NYFood2China-PartII.b-Distributors-LiDestriPS-VF.pdf;	39	
pages,	103	products	sampled	(same	as	Welch’s	and	Mott’s,	they	are	in	the	same	
sector),	13	potential	distributors	identified:		Beijing	Ganghu,	Citures,	GuangDong	
Foodstuffs,	Heng	Tai,	Lee	Woo	Tai,	Longchi,	Pinlive,	Shanghai	Foodstuffs,	
Shanghai	Golden	Fields,	Shanghai	Kingfoods,	Ting	foods,	Wide	Career,	
YanSheung,	Kee.	
o For	Spirits:	NYFood2China-PartII.b-Distributors-LiDestriPS-VF.pdf;	34	pages,	149	
products	sampled	(same	as	Welch’s	and	Mott’s,	they	are	in	the	same	sector),	10	
potential	distributors	identified:		Breightview,	Finigate,	Jebsen,	Pinlive,	Shanghai	
Foodstuffs,	Shanghai	Kingfoods,	Shanghai	Nanpu,	Summergate,	Vandergeeten,	
Wide	Career.	
	
As	can	be	seen,	some	of	the	distributors	were	suggested	to	different	companies.		After	all,	
especially	if	the	NYS	companies	were	not	competing	companies,	having	a	couple	of	producers	
from	this	project	select	the	same	distributor	would	increase	the	distributor’s	“share	of	mind”	of	
NYS	producers	and	perhaps	result	in	more	focus	from	the	Chinese	partner.		On	the	other	hand,	
we	were	also	careful	to	provide	a	different	list	to	every	company,	especially	competing	ones	
(we	had	several	Dairy	and	several	Fruit	Juice	companies)	so	that	they	always	had	the	option	to	
pursue	a	unique	solution.
-	34	-	
Distributor	lists	
	
Following	are	2	schedules	showing:	
	
1. A	list	of	Chinese	distributors	our	analysis	suggests	would	be	suitable	for	market	entry	for	
New	York	State	food	and	beverage	companies,	with	contact	information	
2. Characterization	of	each	distributor	according	to	which	targeted	New	York	State	
companies	and	products	our	analysis	suggests	they	would	be	most	appropriate	for
-	35	-	
																																													 	
Company	NameAkaAddressWeb-siteEst.Telephone	numberNamePhoneemail
1Assure	Company	LimitedAssureRoom	2807,	28/F,	Tower	2,	Metroplaza,	223	Hing	Fong	Road,	Kwai	Fong,	NTwww.assure.com.hk1985	(852)	2388	8839Ricky	Lee8620-8130-4981ricky-lee@assure.com.hk
2Beijing	GanghuBeijing	Ganghu	ZhongfaNA2003Mrs.	Zhao	Shujuan8610-65422466li13910562512@126.com
3Beijing	Just	Business	&	Trading	Co.,	Ltd.Beijing	Just	BusinessHaidian	District,	Beijing	Purple	Bamboo	Villa	A	passerby	Ji	Dong	(Building	3)	Room	104,	100048www.just-mart.com19968855	6332Miss	Xu8610-8855-6332xlf@just-mart.com
4Bright	View	Shanghai	Trading	Co.,	Ltd	BrightviewUnit	B,	10	/	F.,	Wah	Shing	Centre,	5	Fung	Yip	Street,	Chai	Wan,	Hong	Kong	www.brightviewsh.cn1997852	3628	5221	Zhu	Jie8621-6253-0090zhujie@chefonline.com.cn
5Shangai	Citures	Trading	Co.	Ltd.Citures10th	Floor,	Block	A	China	No.	55,	Lane	800,	Zhongshan	Road,	Shanghai	Green	T.	Housewww.citures.cn200386-21-52061025/52061026Wang	Qi8621-5206-1025jhong0818@hotmail.com
6Dah	Chong	Hong	Ltd.Dah	Chong	Hong8/F,	20	Kai	Cheung	Road,	Kowloon	Bay,	Kowloon,	Hong	Kongwww.dchfood.com1949(852)	2768	3388Vincent	Pan8621-5252-4628trade_A@food.dch.com.hk
7EG	DistriSelectaEGDISSuite	720,	KIBS,	No.	928,	Xi	Kang	Street,	200040,	Jing	An	District,	Shanghai,	Chinawww.egdis.cn<200986	21	32270196
8FinigateFinigateNo.572	Kunming	Road	RongGuang	Business	Center	Area	B,	Room	401A,	401D		Shanghai,	200082,	P.R.	Chinawww.finigate.com<200586	21	5119	6896Nicholas	Wu8621-5119-6896info@finigate.com
9GoodwellGoodwell27F,NO.228	MEI	YUAN	ROAD,ENTERPRISES	SQUARE,SHANGHAI	200070,CHINAwww.goodwellchina.com1993(8621)6086	3200Daniel	Zhou8621-6086	3200daniel@goodwellchina.com
10GuangDong	Foodstuffs	(5)GuangDong	Foodstuffswww.china-gdf.com1954
11Guangdong	ZhongTian	(2)Guangdong	ZhongTianRm.	1919,	Wu	Yang	New	Plaza,	111	Si	You	New	Road,	Guangzhou,	Chinawww.zhontian1919.com19988620	87380248GuoPing	Li	(2)zhongtian@263.net.cn
12Heng	Tai	Consumables	Group	Limited	Heng	Tai31st	Floor,	Guangdong	Finance	Building,	88	Connaught	Road	West,	Sheung	Wan,	Hong	Kongwww.hengtai.com.hk1986852	2628	0077Gao	Qin	Jian852-2628-0077contact@hengtai.com.hk
13Jebsen	&	Co.	LtdJebsen28/F,	Caroline	Centre	28	Yun	Ping	Road	Causeway	Bay	Hong	Kong	www.jebsen.com1895(852)	2923	8777	Kevin	Yan8610-8519-8688kevinyan@jebsen.com
14Lee	Woo	TaiLee	Woo	TaiBank	Building,	Room	902,	409-415	Hennessy	Road,	Causeway	Bay,	Hong	Kong,	Guangdongwww.leewotai.com1992852-25747388	Alex	Lam8621-5836-0188alam@leewotai.com
15Shenzhen	Longchi	Food	Co.LongchiRm.E,	22/	F,	South	Flat,	Parkway	Mansion,	3019	Sungang	East	Road,	Shenzhenwww.longchi.com.cn19940755-25933960/3961J	H	Lang86755-2593-3969info@longchi.com.cn
16Hanngzhou	Rondo	Trade	Co.,	Ltd.LongmoreOld	Hill	Road,	Xihu	District	Building,	Room	609,	No.	76	Yitai	www.longmore99.com?0571-88826937	Nicole	Yieyiu86571-8882-6937yieyiu@gmail.com
17Pinlive(shanghai)	Foods	Co.LtdPinliveRoom	308,	Building	10,	652	Changshou	Road.	Shanghaiwww.pinlive.com1995021-51863006Rebeca	Xu8621-5186-3006rebeca@pinlive.com
18Shanghai	Foodstuffs	Imp.&Exp.	Corp.	Shanghai	Maoji	Imp.&Exp.	Co.,LTD.Shangai	FoodstuffsAerospace	Building	8-17	F,No.	525	Sichuan	Road,Shanghaiwww.shfiec.com1954021-63216233	Jonathan	Luo8621-6357-1761hy_xia@shfiec.com.
19Shangai	Golden	Fields	Ltd.Shangai	Golden	FieldsSHANGHAI	EVERBRIGHT	CONVENTION	&	EXHIBITION	CENTER	319	C		No.70	CAOBAO	ROAD	XUHUI	DISTRICT,	SHANGHAI	CHIwww.shjtgs.com19960086-021-64325920	Hao	Jiang8621-6432-5920sj@shjtgs.com
20Shangai	Gourmand	Foods	Trading	LtsShangai	Gourmand	FoodsG/F	Hong	Leong	Industrial	complex,	4	Wang	Kwong	Road,	Kowloon	Bay,	Kowloon,	Hong	Kongwww.wingkee.com1968852-27963111Eric	Zou8621-6249-3663sh-ad20@gourmandfoods.com
21Shangai	Kingfood's	Condiment	Co.	Ltd.Shangai	KingfoodsRoom	2404	A	Building	No.	185	Zhonghua	Road,	Shanghai;	Zip	::	200010www.kingfoods.com.cn1990021-63301868Mao	Zhong	Gao8621-6330-1868kingfoods-mt@163.com
22Shangai	Nanpu	FoodShangai	NanpuTown,	Songjiang	District	in	Shanghai	Jingyang	Road,	Shanghai	Jiugan	1300	www.nanpufood.com1992(021)	61923399Benny	Xu8621-6192-3399marketing@nanpufood.com
23Shenzhen	Tak	Kwong	Trading		Co.Shangai	Tak	Kwong2nd	Floor,Kaili	Building,West	Side,Block	South,33	Cuizhubei	Road,Luohu	District,Shenzhen,China,	518019www.takkwong.com<200586-13825296718	Tak	Way	"Eddie"	Yeung86-755-8240-4166eddieyeung@takkwong.com
24Shenzhen	Yifan	Food	Trading	(2)Shenzhen	Yifan17A,	Sea	View	Plaza,	Prince	Edward	Rd.,	Shekou,	Nanshan	District,	Shenzhen,	Guangdong	Province,	Chinawww.1fsp.cn20020755	26889000Luo	Shen,	CEO	(2)0755	26895299yifansp@vip.163.com
25SummergateSummergate4F	Golden	Finance	Tower,	58	East	Yanan	Road,	Shangaiwww.summergate.com1999Ian	Ford8621-6329-4433ian.ford@summergate.com
26Shenzhen	Sunlight	Coffee	TradingSunlight	CoffeeNews	Road,	Futian	District,	Shenzhen	Huafeng	Building,	Room	807	www.srjcoffee.com<20070755-6130Peter	Wong86-755-6130-5660gzdy@srjcoffee.com
27Shangai	Sunny	LifeSunny	Life6th	Floor,	1265	Changde	Road,	Shanghai	(Xing	Yun	Building)www.shsunnylife.cn1991021-52527733Mr.	Xu	Jun8621-5252-7733xy@shsunlife.com
28Ting	Foods	Imp	&	Exp.	Comp.	Ltd.Ting	FoodsRoom	1209,	Beijing	on	the	8th	gifted	with	Block	B,	Guangqumenwai	Court	Street,	Chaoyang	District			Postal	Code:	100022		www.tingfoods.com<2005(86-10)	5861.3768	Andy8610-5861-3768tingfoods@126.com
29(Beijing)	Vandergeeten	Trade	and	Commerce	Co.	Ltd.VandergeetenSuite	720,	KIBS,	No.	928,	Xi	Kang	Street,	200040,	Jing	An	District,	Shanghai,	Chinawww.vdgcn.com>10Y862-132270086Jessica	Gao8610-5935-9390gf@vdgcn.com	
30Tianjin	Wide	Career	Int'l	Trade	Co.,	Ltd.Wide	CareerTianjin	Friendship	Road,	Hexi	District,	Tianjin	Rome	Garden	building,	Room	1101,	Block	E	www.widecareer.com199786-22-23244092	Li	Jin8622-2328-3382export03@widecareer.com
31Wilson	International	Frozen	Foods	(HK)	Ltd.Wilson	FoodsRm	2104C-F,	Nan	Fung	Centre,	264-298	Castle	Peak	Road,	Tsuen	Wan,	N.T.www.wilsonfoods.com.hk1977(852)	3678	0888David	Pan8621-6354-4653welloceansh@yahoo.com.cn
32Yan	Sheung	Kee	(Ming	Kee)	Coconut	&	Spices	Co.	Ltd.Yan	Sheung	KeeTsing	Yeung	Circuit,	Tuen	Mun,	New	Territories,	Hong	Kong,	9th	Floor,	Room	on	the	1st	century	AD	Industrial	Buildingwww.ysk-mk.com1991(852)	2431	0638	86-769-2250-2081coconutboy@ysk-mk.com
-	36	-	
	
Perceived	SizeProximity	2	current	linesOffices	in
AkaImpSalesMktLog.SMLNoSimilarSameBeijingShangaiGz/Sz/HK(1)ChengduOtherFSROn-LOverall	fit
1AssureXX?XXXXXXXXXXX
2Beijing	Ganghu	ZhongfaXXXXXXX?XXXXXX
3Beijing	Just	BusinessXXX?XXXXXXXXXX
4BrightviewXXXXXxX?XXXXXXXXXXX
5CituresXXXXXX?XXXXXXX
6Dah	Chong	HongXXXXXXXxXXXXXXXXXXX
7EGDISXXXXXXXXxXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
8FinigateXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
9GoodwellXXXXXXXXXXX?XXXXXXXXX
10GuangDong	FoodstuffsXXXXXxX?XXXXXXXXXXXX
11Guangdong	ZhongTianXXXXXxxxXxx?XXXXXXX
12Heng	TaiXXXXXXXxxXxxXXXXXXXXXX
13JebsenXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
14Lee	Woo	TaiXX?XXXXxXXXXXXXXX
15LongchiXXXXXXXxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
16LongmoreXX?XXXX?XXXX
17PinliveXXXXXXXxXX?XXXXXXXXXXXXX
18Shangai	FoodstuffsXXXXXXXXX?XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
19Shangai	Golden	FieldsXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
20Shangai	Gourmand	FoodsXXXXXXXX?XXXX
21Shangai	KingfoodsXX?XXXXXX?XXXXXXXXXXX
22Shangai	NanpuXXXXXXXXX?XXXXXXXXXX
23Shangai	Tak	KwongXXXXXXXXXXXX
24Shenzhen	YifanXXXXXX??XXXXXX
25SummergateXXXXXXXXXXXXX?XXX
26Sunlight	CoffeeXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
27Sunny	LifeXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
28Ting	FoodsXXXXXXXXXX
29VandergeetenXXXXXXXXX?XXXXX
30Wide	CareerXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
31Wilson	FoodsXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
32Yan	Sheung	KeeXXXXXXXXXX
(1)	ShenZhen,	Guangzhon,	Hong	Kong(4)	Food	Service,	Retail,	On-Line	Retail
(3)	Activities	it's	believed	the	company	performs:		importing,	sales,	marketing	(/branding),	logistics	management
LiDestri	Spirits
O-at-ka
ByrneD
SenacaF
Welch's
Mott's
SmithP
LiDestri	Fruit	Juices
LiDestri	Pasta	Sauces
Pasta	Sauces
Fruit	Juices
Dairy	/	Milk	Drinks
Recommended	For:
Co.	Functions	(3)Channels	(4)
Processed	Fruits	&	Veg.
Meat
Spirits
-	37	-	
The	online	opportunity	
(Appendix:	6i)	
	
China’s	on-line	retail	market	is	the	largest	in	the	world,	having	recently	surpassed	that	of	the	
US.		Given	that	the	conventional	“brick	and	mortar”	retail	sector	is	relatively	immature	in	
comparison	to	that	of	more	developed	countries,	the	online	sector	is	in	some	senses	
leapfrogging	rather	than	supplementing	conventional	retail	channels.		Given	that	it	is	critical	
that	New	York	State	companies	considering	exporting	to	China	give	due	consideration	to	the	
role	that	online	can	play	in	their	marketing	strategies.			
	
Recognizing	the	importance	of	this	sector	we	developed	a	detailed	analysis	of	the	online	sector	
as	it	could	apply	to	New	York	State’s	food	and	beverage	companies,	which	is	summarized	
below:	
	
Overview	of	online	landscape	in	China	
• China	is	currently	the	largest	e-commerce	market	in	the	world	after	having	surpassed	
the	U.S.	in	2013,	with	sales	topping	$300	billion	USD	in	2013.	(S4.13)		
• While	U.S.	e-retail	sales	were	double	that	of	China	in	2010,	by	2013	China	had	overtaken	
the	U.S.	to	become	the	world’s	largest	national	e-commerce	market.	Beijing-based	
iResearch	projected	online	retail	sales	in	China	would	grow	another	45.8%	in	2014	to	
more	than	$446	billion.			
• In	2013,	Chinese	online	sales	for	“Singles	day”	(November	11)	tripled	the	most	recent	US	
“Cyber	Monday”	
• China	has	over	564	million	Internet	users	and	755	million	mobile	phone	subscribers.	Of	
these	users,	270	million	also	shop	online.	
• One	of	the	most	relevant	phenomena	is	the	massive	usage	of	social	media.		In	fact,	a	lot	
of	online	sales	today	are	originated	at	social	media	platforms.	
• This	analysis	also	included	information	about	the	following	aspects:	
• PC	vs	mobile	
• Regional	Penetration	
• Key	categories	sold	online,	which	does	include	Food	products	
• A	snapshot	of	government	initiatives	concerning	on-line	
• Key	trends	and	Future	of	on-line	sales	
• Key	Players	
	
Key	findings	
	
Alternatives,	and	complexities	for	US	companies	entering	China’s	online	marketplace;		
	
• Most	sites	require	that	the	merchants	be	a	Chinese	entity,so	a	foreign	
company	must	set	up	a	WFOE	(Wholly	Foreign	Owned	Enterprise).	One	
can	avoid	going	through	the	lengthy	procedures	of	setting	up	a	
WFOE	and	developing	one’s	own	e-commerce	presence	by	hiring	an	
intermediary	company	to	assist	in	online	sales.	However,	that	naturally
-	38	-	
brings	along	risks	and	one	will,	therefore,	have	to	decide	how	important	
IP	rights	are	to	one’s	business.	One	will	also	have	less	control	over	one’s	
business	in	China.	On	the	other	hand,	setting	up	a	WFOE	and	developing	
e-commerce	operations	will	require	a	long-term	commitment	and	
consequently	sufficient	resources.		Just	like	anywhere	else	in	the	world,	
in	order	to	protect	one’s	own	interests,	one	must	make	sure	to	conduct	
proper	due	diligence	on	the	party	one	will	be	working	with	and	write	up	a	
solid	contract.	Protecting	one’s	brands	is	of	the	essence.	(S4.16)	
• Furthermore,	some	companies,	like	Tmall,	require	companies	to	provide	
a	China-based	product	return	arrangement	and	Chinese-language	
customer	service	support.	
• There	are	a	couple	of	companies	in	China	dedicated	exclusively	to	being	
intermediaries	for	foreign	companies	that	want	to	sell	in	China	for	online	
sales	only		
• CROSS-BORDER	websites.		In	2012,	the	Customs	Agency	of	China	opened	
kuajington.com,	a	website	dedicated	to	foreign	companies	that	does	not	
force	them	to	incorporate	in	China.		The	report	includes	more	
information	on	the	most		effective	ways	of	using	cross-border	websites.		
• Finally,	companies	can	create	their	websites	in	their	home	countries	
offering	to	ship	products	from	overseas.		This	is	also	cross-border	trade.	
	
• Chinese	Customs	charge	10%	duties	for	food	and	beverage	products	received	via	mail.		In	
kuajington.com,	duties	are	charged	to	consumers	via	price.		The	consumer	also	pays	the	
duties	of	products	sent	by	mail	via	other	cross-border	sites.		In	tmall.hk,	however,	the	
merchant	will	pay	the	duties.	
	
• This	report	includes	a	2-page	profile	analysis	of	each	of	the	key	players	in	each	of	the	
following	sub-segments:	
• Consumer	to	Consumer	(C2C)	–	Taobao	(Alibaba	group)	
• Business	to	Business	(B2B)	–	Alibaba	
• Business	to	Consumer	(B2C)	(probably	the	most	relevant	to	our	
companies):		Tmall	(Alibaba	group),	hc360,	Suning,	Vip.	Gome,	Dandand,	
Amazon,	Yixun,	yhd	and	Kaujingtong	
• Key	information	provided	for	each	of	these	platforms:	
• General	information:		description	and	positioning,	sales	and	
growth,	whether	or	not	they	sell	food	products,	other	generic	
comments.	
• Statistics:		ranking	in	China,	visitor’s	engagement,	audience	
demographics,	audience	geography,	etc.	
• How	to	become	a	vendor.	
	
• The	report	includes	four	case	studies/examples	of	US	companies	with	relevant	
experience	in	Chinese	e-commerce	and	which	strategies	they	pursued.
-	39	-	
• This	report	also	presents	key	recommendations	for	companies	considering	exploring	
this	channel,	including:	
• Clean	and	minimalistic	website	designs	preferred	in	the	U.S.	and	other	
countries	are	not	received	well	by	Chinese	shoppers,	who	prefer	a	crowded	
and	compact	website,	which	gives	them	the	impression	of	a	"high-energy”	
shopping	atmosphere.	
• Shoppers	also	prefer	to	open	up	links	in	new	windows	for	faster	comparison	
of	prices	rather	than	switching	back	and	forth	between	pages.	
• Companies	should	write	a	lot	of	text	to	describe	products	and	services,	even	
if	they	have	great	pictures.		Search	engines	recognize	text.		The	more	the	text	
the	higher	the	chances	of	being	found.	
• Text	should	be	improved	as	time	goes	by	and	capturing	and	maintaining	the	
customer’s	attention.		It	should	be	written	as	if	it	was	a	novel	or	fiction	to	
keep	interest	
• Chinese	shoppers	are	extremely	price	sensitive	–	sales,	deals,	and	
promotions	are	great	crowd	pullers,	and	there	is	little	to	no	brand	loyalty.	
The	‘time	is	money’	concept	hasn’t	really	caught	on,	and	buyers	rarely	pay	
the	extra	to	get	their	wares	to	arrive	faster.	
• Logistics	is	essential	for	e-commerce,	and	third-party	delivery	systems	have	
been	found	to	be	lacking.	After	finding	that	more	than	60%	of	customer	
complaints	received	were	related	to	problems	in	delivery,	yihaodian	
responded	by	building	their	own	last-mile	delivery	system.	
• Trial	and	error	will	give	each	company	the	right	experience	to	have	good	
effective	promotions.		As	much	time	as	possible	should	be	spent	in	this	
process.	
• Companies	should	try	to	have	as	much	original	content	as	possible	if	they	can	
invest	in	search	engines.	
• Product	info	should	be	refreshed	as	much	as	possible.	
• Small	companies	should	ask	friends	to	review	products	and	do	site	clicks!	
• Products	should	be	described	using	as	much	as	possible	the	standard	name	
known	to	the	public	and	used	by	other	companies.		Standard	names	will	get	
found	by	search	engines	more	frequently.	
• Companies	should	hire	great	contractors.	They	are	going	to	need	expert	help	
in	areas	such	as	“search-engine	optimization”	to	attract	customers,	in	
package	delivery	and	in	manufacturing	if	they	are	launching	a	product.	
Companies	will	improve	your	chances	of	success	if	they	select	contractors	
carefully.	
• Companies	should	not	plan	on	making	money	right	away.	
• Companies	should	expect	to	be	imitated.			Intellectual	property	should	be	
protected.	
	
• The	report	ends	with	a	couple	of	specific	notes	on	Marketing.
-	40	-	
Finally,	in	analyzing	the	role	of	online	retail	and	its	potential	for	New	York	State	companies	we	
have	identified	two	recommendations	for	consideration	by	Empire	State	Development	and	
other	New	York	State	agencies:	
	
• Create	a	relatively	simple	China-facing	portal	for	New	York	State	companies	to	promote	
their	products,	which	New	York	State	could	support	with	the	technological	platform,	
language	translation,	and	broad	marketing	guidelines	as	noted	above	
• For	qualified	larger	companies	with	significant	export	potential	New	York	State	should	
consider	providing	more	professional	market	entry	support	with	a	specific	emphasis	on	
the	e-commerce	opportunity.		
	
While	New	York	State	is	a	powerful	brand,	it	is	not	necessarily	top	of	mind	for	food	products.		
Most	Chinese	are	not	looking	for	New	York	State	products.		A	state-level	effort	to	extend	New	
York’s	brands	(Pride	of	New	York	/	Taste	NY)	to	incorporate	the	characteristics	that	China’s	
emerging	middle-class	and	affluent	consumers	are	seeking	–	food	safety,	environmental	
friendliness,	and	health	–	can	be	particularly	effective	in	the	online	space	where	Chinese	
consumers	can	be	drawn	directly	to	New	York	State’s	offerings.	
	
This	analysis	was	made	available	to	all	of	our	targeted	New	York	State	companies.
-	41	-	
Analysis	of	Private	Label	Landscape	in	China	
(Appendix:	6j)	
	
Private	label	is	an	important	part	of	the	business	models	of	a	number	of	the	largest	and	most	
capable	food	and	beverage	companies	in	New	York	State,	including	several	of	those	that	we	
targeted	for	this	project:		O-AT-KA	Milk,	Byrne	Dairy,	Seneca	Foods,	Smith	Packing	and	LiDestri.			
Given	that,	it	was	important	that	we	consider	the	state	of	the	private	label	sector	in	China	This	
analysis	was	was	made	available	to	all	the	above	companies.	
	
Key	findings:	
	
• Private	label	is	a	relatively	small	part	of	the	food	and	beverage	sector	in	China,	
representing	only	about	1%	of	overall	retail	sales.		Consumer	preference	for	major	
brand	names	is	accompanied	by	a	perception	of	private	label	products	as	being	of	lower	
quality.	
• Given	the	experience	of	more	developed	Western	countries,	it	seems	likely	that	over	
time	the	market	share	occupied	by	private	labels	may	increase	dramatically,	especially	
as	the	retail	sector	becomes	more	organized	and	consolidated	and	larger	retailers	
become	more	capable	of	developing	quality	private	label	products	as	trusted	
alternatives	to	major	established	brands.		European	countries	have	private	label	
penetrations	between	20%	and	53%w,	while	in	the	U.S.	the	category	is	estimated	to	
represent	about	17%	of	the	sector35
.		Furthermore,	in	the	U.S.,	private	label	has	a	
significantly	higher	share	of	the	food	category	than	non-food	categories.		This	suggests	
that,	over	the	long	term,	New	York	State	companies	able	to	partner	with	strong	Chinese	
retailers	may	find	that	private	label	production	becomes	an	excellent	opportunity.	
	
This	report	also	presents	the	key	retail	chains	developing	private	label	programs	as	well	as	the	
key	private	label	players	in	each	of	the	covered	categories;	these	would	be	the	competitors	for	
New	York	State	companies	entering	this	arena.	
	
	
	 	
																																																								
35
	“Private	Label	&	National	Brands:		Paving	the	Path	to	Growth	Together”,	Dec	2013,	IRI.	
http://www.iriworldwide.com/Portals/0/T_T%20December%202013%20Private%20Label.pdf
-	42	-	
Database	of	NYS	Food	and	Beverage	Producers	with	Export	Potential	
	
As	one	of	the	outputs	of	this	project,	CCE	staff	worked	with	consultant	Luis	Gato	to	develop	
what	is	likely	the	most	comprehensive	available	list	of	NYS	agricultural,	food	and	beverage	
producers	–	approximately	21,000	entries	–	including	valuable	information	on	each	company	
such	as	industry	sector,	estimated	sales	volume,	number	of	employees,	export	experience,	and	
contact	information.	
	
We	also	identified	a	subset	of	that	list,	comprising	about	450	companies	with	high	export	
potential,	including	at	least	one	or	two	companies	from	each	industry	sub-sector.		This	short	list	
should	be	a	useful	tool	for	anyone	who	needs	to	reach	out	quickly	to	the	most	likely	prospects	
for	export	opportunities	–	e.g.,	for	a	quick	response	to	a	request	for	NYS	products	by	a	foreign	
importer.	
	
The	details	of	how	these	two	databases	were	developed	–	which	involved	both	compilation	of	
lists	from	multiple	sources	and	manual	sorting	and	selecting	of	the	data	to	identify	the	most	
likely	export	prospects	-	are	described	in	the	Appendix	3a	to	this	report.	
	
Some	highlights	of	the	database	
	
Having	created	these	databases,	certain	findings	relative	to	the	export	potential	of	various	food	
and	beverage	industry	sectors	emerged:	
o Soft	Drinks	(including	water):	This	is	the	largest	sub-sector	in	terms	of	sales	volumes	and	
second	largest	employer;	together	with	breweries	they	have	the	largest	average	employees	
per	unit.		It	appears	to	be	the	sector	with	the	most	leverage	for	growth	and	employment.		It	
has,	however,	little	of	the	connection	with	agricultural	production	in	New	York	State	that	is	
the	focus	of	this	project.	
	
o Fruit	and	Vegetable	Preserving	and	Specialty	Food	Manufacturing:	This	is	the	second	largest	
sub-sector	in	overall	sales,	number	three	in	employment	and	number	four	in	employees	per	
company.		It’s	also	the	second	in	terms	of	number	of	companies	that	reported	that	they	
already	export.	
	
o Dairy:		This	sub-sector,	which	includes	dairy	processing	companies,	include	the	largest	
number	of	companies	reported	to	be	currently	exporting.		Although	only	number	5	in	sales	
volume,	it	is	the	second	largest	employer	in	manufacturing.				
Export	growth	in	both	of	these	sectors,	which	includes	large	and	competent	companies,	would	
have	obvious	direct	benefits	to	New	York	State	agricultural	producers	who	supply	–	and	in	some	
cases	have	equity	stakes	in	–	these	processing	and	manufacturing	companies.
-	43	-	
o Bakeries.		Although	this	might	not	be	the	most	likely	product	to	export,	bakeries	are	the	
third	largest	sub-sector	in	sales	and	are	the	largest	employer.		The	average	bakery,	
however,	has	less	than	7	employees	but	there	are	some	larger	ones.	
	
o Breweries:		This	sub-sector	is	number	3	in	sales	growth	and	number	1	in	terms	of	average	
number	of	employees	per	company.		Also,	outside	of	agricultural	activities,	they	are	one	of	
the	top	3	non-agricultural	activities	in	terms	of	employee	intensity	per	sales,	that	is,	these	
companies	generate	the	most	amount	of	jobs	per	each	dollar	of	sales.		So	this	is	a	sector	
where	little	sales	can	generate	a	lot	of	direct	employment.		Moreover,	the	craft	breweries	
have	become	an	American	favorite	and,	as	they	achieve	maturity	and	competition	gets	
harder,	they	may	be	in	need	of	finding	newer	markets.		
Potential	next	steps	identified	as	a	result	of	the	analysis	of	this	database	are:	
• Meeting	with	the	NY	State	Trade	Associations.	
• Looking	for	global	markets	for	these	industries.		This	could	be	done	in	two	steps:	
o First,	identifying	overall	global	markets	or	geographies	with	an	apparent	demand	
deficit.	
o Second,	perhaps	with	some	syndicated	data,	digging	deep	into	this,	identifying	
specific	countries,	analyzing	those	markets,	their	potential,	their	duty	policies,	
etc.	
• Considering	specific	incentives	to	help	make	these	products	more	competitive.
-	44	-	
Survey	of	Export	Activity	and	Potential	
	
With	the	assistance	of	Cornell’s	Survey	Research	Institute	and	the	Consultant,	the	Project	
Manager	developed	and	fielded	a	survey	of	New	York	State	agricultural,	food	and	beverage	
companies	with	the	goal	of	assessing	1)	their	level	of	experience	with	export	markets;	(2)	their	
assessment	of	the	future	opportunities	represented	by	those	markets;	and	(3)	their	perception	
of	the	challenges	they	face	and	the	assistance	that	would	be	beneficial	in	responding	to	those	
opportunities.		The	151	respondents	represented	a	wide	range	of	product	categories,	
geographies,	export	experience	levels,	and	business	size.			
	
Key	findings	from	the	survey	include:	
	
• A	large	majority	of	those	responding	to	a	specific	question	on	the	subject	believe	that	
exports	will	be	an	increasingly	important	part	of	the	market	for	New	York’s	food	and	
beverage	products;	and	they	believe	that	export	demand	will	be	driven	by	the	perceived	
quality	and	safety	of	New	York	State’s	products.			
• While	nearby	markets	(Canada/Mexico)	and	developed	markets	(the	European	Union)	
are	identified	as	priority	markets,	great	Asia	including	China	is	also	viewed	as	a	very	
substantial	opportunity.	
• Multiple	respondents	identified	challenges	in	two	specific	areas	in	which	government	
and	industry	organizations	could	provide	assistance;	these	can	be	summarized	as	
follows:	
o Overcoming	organizational	capacity	constraints	to	allow	investment	in	
development	of	export	markets	
o Regulatory,	tariff,	and	logistics	issues	
In	addition	to	a	complete	analysis	of	the	results	of	the	survey,	the	Project	Manager	developed	a	
number	of	specific	recommendations	for	actions	that	New	York	State	could	take	to	support	
export	development	based	on	the	survey	responses.		These	include:	
	
• Consolidating	and	increasing	the	ease	of	access	to	existing	resources	that	support	
businesses	beginning	or	growing	their	export	activities;		
• Developing	a	program	of	direct	China	market	entry	support	for	medium	to	large	
companies	in	targeted	sectors	where	strong	opportunities	have	been	identified;		
• Developing	a	statewide	digital	marketing	strategy	for	China	in	recognition	of	the	
explosive	growth	of	the	Chinese	commercial	internet;	and		
• Strengthening	cooperative	marketing	programs,	with	a	special	focus	on	export	
development,	for	New	York’s	maple	and	honey	industries,	whose	particular	
characteristics	offer	unique	opportunities	for	growth.						
The	survey	results,	analysis	and	recommendations	are	included	as	appendix	4	to	this	report.
-	45	-	
Evaluating	the	Project’s	Overall	Effectiveness	
	
As	noted	elsewhere,	the	articulated	goals	of	the	CCE	China	Export	Project	were	threefold36
:	
	
1. To	develop	and	implement	a	successful	response	to	the	identified	opportunity	to	export	
differentiated	NYS	agricultural	products	to	high-end	consumer	markets	in	China.		
2. To	identify	additional	overseas	markets	for	these	products	and	develop	a	plan	to	reach	
those	markets.	
3. To	increase	the	capacity	of	the	Extension	system	to	engage	with	overseas	market	
opportunities	on	behalf	of	NYS	agricultural	producers	and	businesses.	
	 	
It	was	further	noted	in	the	project	proposal	that	“fulfilling	the	China	market	demand	potential	
will	entail	scaling	up	New	York’s	capacity	–	from	producers	and	processors	through	distribution.	
Developing	this	market	opportunity	will	be	a	powerful	driver	of	job	creation	not	only	in	the	
producing	sector	but	also	in	the	numerous	important	economic	sectors	linked	to	agricultural	
production.”	
	
Although	the	consummation	of	a	specific	level	of	sales	orders	during	the	funded	period	was	not	
a	firm	commitment	of	the	project,	achieving	some	significant	level	of	sales	in	the	short	term,	
and	establishing	a	clear	path	toward	rapidly	increasing	those	sales	was	clearly	an	expectation	of	
the	participants	and	the	funder.		That	expectation	was	certainly	reflected	in	the	fact	that	more	
than	50%	of	the	project	funding	was	committed	to	sales	development	activities	to	be	carried	
out	by	Safe	Source	Trading.				
	
As	described	elsewhere	in	this	report,	Safe	Source	Trading	was	notably	ineffective	at	fulfilling	
the	expectations	they	had	created	for	the	project,	despite	the	ongoing	support	and	efforts	at	
guidance	by	CCE	staff.		SST	had	established	a	target	of	at	least	$500,000	in	sales	to	be	
completed	within	an	8-month	period,	to	be	followed	by	rapid	growth	thereafter	($10	million	
per	year	at	the	end	of	18	months	and	$200	million	per	year	at	the	end	of	five	years).		In	reality,	
it	took	SST	18	months	to	fulfill	a	single	order	with	a	total	value	of	just	over	$31,000.		Perhaps	
even	more	telling	is	the	fact	that	once	the	grant	funding	supporting	their	efforts	was	no	longer	
available	there	was	no	evidence	that	SST	was	building	on	even	this	small	success	–	nor	that	it	
was	even	making	any	effort	to	do	so.			SST’s	final	project	report	(included	as	Appendix	5	here)	
can	be	summarized	as	stating	that	developing	this	market,	including	establishing	relationships	
with	capable	New	York	State	buyers	and	dealing	with	the	challenges	of	the	Chinese	market,	
turned	out	to	be	much	more	complex	and	time-consuming	than	they	had	anticipated.		
	
The	Project	Manager’s	evaluation	of	the	reasons	why	the	sales	results	were	disappointing	are	
quite	a	bit	more	pointed.		Very	early	in	the	project	it	became	clear	that	strong	management	
discipline	and	a	clear	strategy	were	lacking	in	SST’s	operation.		Jeremy	Haft,	SST’s	founder,	US-
based	leader,	and	the	conceptualizer	of	this	project,	did	not	once	visit	a	prospective	New	York	
State	exporter	in	New	York	State	throughout	the	term	of	the	project,	despite	the	Program	
																																																								
36
	Appendix	1a:	CCE	Proposal	2016-06-07
-	46	-	
Manager’s	frequent	requests	that	he	do	so.		Instead,	he	hired	a	highly-paid	Vice	President	for	
Sales	(Jeffrey	Mills)	with	high-profile	experience	in	restaurant	management	and	school	food	
service	but	no	experience	with	China,	export	development,	or	the	wholesale	food	business,	and	
no	evidence	of	being	able	to	implement	a	complex	strategic	selling	program.		SST	made	the	
decision	early	on	to	invest	significantly	in	participation	in	a	trade	show	in	China,	and	CCE	staff	
committed	significant	grant	resources	to	support	preparation	for	this	show	and	to	attend.		
Jeremy	Haft,	however,	did	not	attend,	instead	sending	Mills;	Haft’s	China	partner,	Wang	Feng,	
who	may	be	well-connected	but	evidenced	no	capacity	to	make	headway	in	China’s	food	and	
beverage	markets;	and	Trip	Taylor,	a	recent	student	of	Haft’s	at	Georgetown	whose	Chinese	
language	skills	were	helpful.		While	participation	in	the	trade	show	was	certainly	educational	for	
project	staff,	in	the	absence	of	a	clear	sales	strategy	it	resulted	in	no	sales	or	even	strong	sales	
leads.	
	
Recognizing	early	on	that	not	only	were	SST’s	sales	promises	proving	highly	unrealistic,	but	that	
SST	had	no	real	strategic	plan	to	approach	the	market,	the	Project	Manager	made	a	number	of	
changes	described	in	more	detail	elsewhere	in	this	report.		In	summary,	working	with	a	
consultant	with	relevant	experience,	and	with	the	knowledge	gleaned	in	preparation	for	the	
project	and	in	observing	SST’s	efforts,	we	were	able	to	create	and	disseminate	significant	
resources	that	should	strengthen	the	capabilities	of	New	York	State’s	potential	exporting	
companies	and	of	the	agencies	supporting	those	companies,	including	Cornell	Cooperative	
Extension.		Key	among	the	products	of	that	work	are:	
	
• Overall	China	Market	Analysis	for	Agriculture,	Food	and	Beverage	Products	
• Category	Specific	Market	Analyses	
• Online	Market	–	Special	Analysis	
• Private	Label	Market	–	Special	Analysis	
• Database	of	Potential	NYS	Exporters	(Ag/Food/Beverage)	including	Top	Prospects	
• Survey	of	Export	Activity	and	Potential	Among	NYS	Producers	
	
The	market	analyses	described	above	were	developed	specifically	to	be	of	value	to	a	short	list	
of	companies	with	the	greatest	potential	to	develop	exports	to	the	Chinese	market,	and	were	
presented	to	senior	executives	at	those	companies.		Summaries	of	these	analyses	and	other	
findings	of	the	project	were	shared	with	Empire	State	Development	staff,	with	CCE	staff,	and	
with	other	interested	participants	at	the	2015	Cornell	Strategic	Marketing	Conference.	
	
To	maximize	the	value	of	the	work	done	under	this	project	and	described	above	the	Project	
Manager	has	recommended	the	funding	of	certain	follow-on	activities,	including:			
	
(1) Consolidating	and	increasing	the	ease	of	access	to	existing	resources	that	support	
businesses	beginning	or	growing	their	export	activities;		
(2) Developing	a	program	of	direct	China	market	entry	support	for	medium	to	large	
companies	in	targeted	sectors	where	strong	opportunities	have	been	identified;
-	47	-	
(3) Developing	a	statewide	digital	marketing	strategy	for	China	in	recognition	of	the	
explosive	growth	of	the	Chinese	commercial	internet;	and		
(4) Strengthening	cooperative	marketing	programs,	with	a	special	focus	on	export	
development,	for	New	York’s	maple	and	honey	industries,	whose	particular	
characteristics	offer	unique	opportunities	for	growth.
Final report 2016-07-13
Final report 2016-07-13
Final report 2016-07-13
Final report 2016-07-13
Final report 2016-07-13
Final report 2016-07-13
Final report 2016-07-13
Final report 2016-07-13
Final report 2016-07-13
Final report 2016-07-13
Final report 2016-07-13
Final report 2016-07-13

More Related Content

Similar to Final report 2016-07-13

CFA Regional Presentation Slides
CFA Regional Presentation SlidesCFA Regional Presentation Slides
CFA Regional Presentation SlidesCassandraCook19
 
WHO-2019-nCoV-Country-IAR-templates-presentation-2021.1-eng.pptx
WHO-2019-nCoV-Country-IAR-templates-presentation-2021.1-eng.pptxWHO-2019-nCoV-Country-IAR-templates-presentation-2021.1-eng.pptx
WHO-2019-nCoV-Country-IAR-templates-presentation-2021.1-eng.pptxAtulKadyan
 
Drawing modelling canvas for the international positioning of
Drawing modelling canvas for the international positioning ofDrawing modelling canvas for the international positioning of
Drawing modelling canvas for the international positioning ofAlexander Decker
 
Global distribution management_system_markets-futuristic_reports
Global distribution management_system_markets-futuristic_reportsGlobal distribution management_system_markets-futuristic_reports
Global distribution management_system_markets-futuristic_reportspurvamutha
 
Wikipedia Zero 2012- 2013 Year End Update
Wikipedia Zero 2012- 2013 Year End UpdateWikipedia Zero 2012- 2013 Year End Update
Wikipedia Zero 2012- 2013 Year End UpdateKul Wadhwa
 

Similar to Final report 2016-07-13 (7)

FINAL BASELINE REPORT_ PACE_ PKSF_GJUS_ BHOLA_Bangladesh 15112016
FINAL BASELINE REPORT_ PACE_ PKSF_GJUS_ BHOLA_Bangladesh 15112016FINAL BASELINE REPORT_ PACE_ PKSF_GJUS_ BHOLA_Bangladesh 15112016
FINAL BASELINE REPORT_ PACE_ PKSF_GJUS_ BHOLA_Bangladesh 15112016
 
CFA Regional Presentation Slides
CFA Regional Presentation SlidesCFA Regional Presentation Slides
CFA Regional Presentation Slides
 
WHO-2019-nCoV-Country-IAR-templates-presentation-2021.1-eng.pptx
WHO-2019-nCoV-Country-IAR-templates-presentation-2021.1-eng.pptxWHO-2019-nCoV-Country-IAR-templates-presentation-2021.1-eng.pptx
WHO-2019-nCoV-Country-IAR-templates-presentation-2021.1-eng.pptx
 
COVID 19
COVID 19COVID 19
COVID 19
 
Drawing modelling canvas for the international positioning of
Drawing modelling canvas for the international positioning ofDrawing modelling canvas for the international positioning of
Drawing modelling canvas for the international positioning of
 
Global distribution management_system_markets-futuristic_reports
Global distribution management_system_markets-futuristic_reportsGlobal distribution management_system_markets-futuristic_reports
Global distribution management_system_markets-futuristic_reports
 
Wikipedia Zero 2012- 2013 Year End Update
Wikipedia Zero 2012- 2013 Year End UpdateWikipedia Zero 2012- 2013 Year End Update
Wikipedia Zero 2012- 2013 Year End Update
 

Final report 2016-07-13