Home
Explore
Submit Search
Upload
Login
Signup
Advertisement
Upcoming SlideShare
ITU 34/2015
Loading in ... 3
1
of
2
Top clipped slide
Indirect Tax Update 11/2015
Mar. 25, 2015
•
0 likes
2 likes
×
Be the first to like this
Show More
•
375 views
views
×
Total views
0
On Slideshare
0
From embeds
0
Number of embeds
0
Download Now
Download to read offline
Report
Economy & Finance
Indirect Tax Update for week ending 20 March 2015
Graham Brearley
Follow
Senior Manager at Grant Thornton UK LLP
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Recommended
ITU 34/2015
Graham Brearley
268 views
•
2 slides
Diverted Profits Tax (a) Google Tax: United Kingdom’s combat against tax evasion
Thangadurai Punithan
335 views
•
3 slides
ITU 11/2016
Graham Brearley
177 views
•
2 slides
ITU 13/2016
Graham Brearley
184 views
•
2 slides
ITU 28/2016
Graham Brearley
134 views
•
2 slides
ITU 33/2016
Graham Brearley
129 views
•
2 slides
More Related Content
Slideshows for you
(20)
ITU 14/2016
Graham Brearley
•
136 views
ITU 31/2016
Graham Brearley
•
126 views
Indirect Tax Update 02/2016
Graham Brearley
•
260 views
Italy: VAT - New rules from 2015
Alex Baulf
•
1.2K views
ITU 24/2016
Graham Brearley
•
229 views
ITU 03/2017
Graham Brearley
•
159 views
ITU 10/2016
Graham Brearley
•
142 views
Case Alert Wakefield College - Upper Tribunal
Graham Brearley
•
452 views
Case alert - Heating and Plumbing Supplies Ltd
Graham Brearley
•
335 views
ITU 29/2016
Graham Brearley
•
98 views
Case alert Finmeccanica Global Services SpA - Court of Appeal
Graham Brearley
•
318 views
Briefing Paper: More EU VAT changes
Graham Brearley
•
836 views
ITU 06/2016
Graham Brearley
•
179 views
ITU 10/2018
Graham Brearley
•
255 views
Indirect Tax Update 07/2015
Graham Brearley
•
370 views
ITU 01/2017
Graham Brearley
•
229 views
Horner Downey & Co- Tax Matters
Jenny Ferguson
•
68 views
pwc-international-tax-news-august-2015
Viktorija Kristholde-Luse
•
774 views
ITU 23/2016
Graham Brearley
•
270 views
US desk quarterly newsletter - September 2016 edition
Quentin Van Gansberghe
•
213 views
Similar to Indirect Tax Update 11/2015
(20)
Indirect Tax Update for week ending 25 April 2014
Alex Baulf
•
252 views
ITU 21/2016
Graham Brearley
•
111 views
Indirect Tax Update 19/2015
Graham Brearley
•
306 views
ITU 05/2018
Graham Brearley
•
206 views
ITU 17/2016
Graham Brearley
•
137 views
Case Alert Associated Newspapers - Upper Tribunal
Graham Brearley
•
238 views
Indirect Tax Update 30/2015
Graham Brearley
•
201 views
ITU 20/2016
Graham Brearley
•
162 views
Measures to combat online marketplace VAT fraud
Alex Baulf
•
191 views
VAT Hot Topics October 2015
Jo Styne
•
124 views
ITU 26/2016
Graham Brearley
•
122 views
Indirect Tax Update 12/2015
Graham Brearley
•
614 views
Case Alert - Bratt Auto Services / Contracts Ltd v HMRC
Graham Brearley
•
369 views
Case alert Trinity Mirror Plc
Graham Brearley
•
257 views
Case Alert: Trinity Mirror PLC
Alex Baulf
•
321 views
Case alert : Associated newspapers Court of Appeal
Graham Brearley
•
170 views
VAT: Transfer of a Going Concern
Alex Baulf
•
361 views
Indirect Tax Update 01/2018
Graham Brearley
•
227 views
Indirect Tax Update 10 May 2016
Yasser Naqvi
•
89 views
ITU 15/2016
Graham Brearley
•
135 views
Advertisement
More from Graham Brearley
(20)
ITU 07/2018
Graham Brearley
•
64 views
Case alert: Summit Electrical Installations Ltd Upper Tribunal Judgment
Graham Brearley
•
55 views
ITU 08/2018
Graham Brearley
•
253 views
Vat Alert: Reverse Charge on Construction Services
Graham Brearley
•
38 views
ITU 09/2018
Graham Brearley
•
49 views
ITU 06/2018
Graham Brearley
•
30 views
Case Alert - University of Cambridge
Graham Brearley
•
211 views
Vat Alert - Cost Sharing Groups
Graham Brearley
•
201 views
Case Alert - VWFS - Advocate General's opinion
Graham Brearley
•
233 views
Case Alert - Wakefield College - Court of Appeal
Graham Brearley
•
204 views
Case alert - Ryanair - Advocate General's opinion
Graham Brearley
•
250 views
ITU 06/2018
Graham Brearley
•
220 views
Case Alert - Marks & Spencer
Graham Brearley
•
629 views
Case Alert - Marriott Rewards / Whitbread - Upper Tribunal
Graham Brearley
•
262 views
ITU 04/2018
Graham Brearley
•
498 views
Case Alert DPAS Ltd - Advocate General's opinion
Graham Brearley
•
352 views
Brexit Alert
Graham Brearley
•
855 views
Case Alert: Kreuzmayr CJEU Judgment
Graham Brearley
•
265 views
ITU 03/2018
Graham Brearley
•
410 views
Case alert - Boehringer Ingleheim Pharma CJEU Judgment
Graham Brearley
•
419 views
Recently uploaded
(20)
flirting with stocks.pdf
Sumni Uchiha
•
0 views
Clients Loan Book Calculator and Tracker
Aydasuma
•
0 views
Entrepreneurial Orientation and Human Resource Management: The Mediating Role...
NAUMAN MUSHTAQ
•
2 views
III_UNIT.pptx
ShantanuDharekar
•
0 views
Recent Economic and Financial Developments by Sylvain Leduc
Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
•
48 views
Construction Spending and Outlook - The USA and the World - June 2023 - Analy...
paul young cpa, cga
•
0 views
4609083520200729075827 (2).pdf
raazia gul
•
3 views
Comparative Economic Development
AnandMadhav4
•
0 views
Efficiency of Power Generation Companies in Pakistan: Application of Non-Para...
NAUMAN MUSHTAQ
•
2 views
Event Organizer Income Statement Spreadsheets
Aydasuma
•
0 views
CHAPTER sixteeen1.ppt
HiboAbdiNuur
•
0 views
CBS Case Competition 2022 Pitch Deck.pptx
ShazanSalim
•
0 views
the man who solved the market.pdf
Sumni Uchiha
•
0 views
The Effects of Information Asymmetry, Accounting Information and Personal Val...
NAUMAN MUSHTAQ
•
2 views
beats the market.pdf
Sumni Uchiha
•
0 views
Facebook_Strategic_Analysis.pdf
ssuserb6c15e
•
1 view
indian share market for beginners.pdf
Sumni Uchiha
•
0 views
DARAZ SELLER ECPMMERCE.docx
MuhammadSufyanAbbasi1
•
4 views
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND COST OF CAPITAL: EVIDENCE FROM ASIAN MULTINATIONAL C...
NAUMAN MUSHTAQ
•
2 views
how to trade in stocks.pdf
Sumni Uchiha
•
0 views
Advertisement
Indirect Tax Update 11/2015
© 2015 Grant
Thornton UK LLP. All rights reserved. ITU Summary Budget week sees the introduction of new legislation to make certain charities fall within the "section 33" VAT refund scheme. A welcome move which recognises the essential role that these charities perform. The Budget also introduces proposals that will affect UK partly exempt businesses with branches established overseas. The proposed legislation intends to prevent UK businesses from including taxable supplies made by overseas branches from being included in the partial exemption formula. The First-tier Tribunal has also issued a number of fresh and interesting decisions. 23 March 2015 2015 Budget – indirect tax provisions Although there was not a great deal to shout about from an indirect tax point of view in last week's Budget, the Chancellor did announce a number of welcome measures aimed at helping certain qualifying charities to reclaim VAT they incur on non-business activities. Historically, the activities of these charities have been regarded as not constituting an 'economic' or business activity which has meant that VAT incurred on the purchase of goods or services has been an absolute cost. The new arrangements are intended to alleviate that problem and will be welcomed by all concerned. Charities involved in search and rescue (defined as charities whose main purpose is to search for and rescue people at risk of death or serious injury or whose main purpose is to support, develop or promote such charities), will, from 1 April 2015, be entitled to submit a claim to HMRC for VAT incurred in relation to non-business activities. Similarly, air ambulance charities, medical courier charities and charities which provide palliative care services (hospices) will also benefit from the refund scheme. Due to the timing of this year's General Election, the Finance Bill will become the Finance Act in record time and will make charities, which meet certain legal conditions, 'qualifying' charities. In essence, for search and rescue charities, the main condition is that the activities will have to be co-ordinated by a 'relevant' authority (such as the Secretary of State, a Police force or, in Scotland, a Fire and Rescue Service). An air ambulance charity will need to provide air ambulance services pursuant to arrangements made with an NHS body. Medical courier charities will be required to provide services for the transportation of items intended for use for medical purposes, such as blood, medicines and other medical supplies and palliative care charities will be required to provide palliative care to terminally ill patients at the direction of, or under the supervision of a registered medical practitioner or a registered nurse. Provided the conditions are met, qualifying charities will be entitled to submit a claim for the VAT they incur. Some of the charities will also provide goods or services that are regarded as business activities and, in that situation, the new law will require qualifying charities to apportion the VAT between business and non-business activities so that only the input tax attributable to the non-business activities is claimed. VAT at 20% can represent a significant cost to the affected charities which provide essential services. By introducing the refund scheme, the Chancellor has, clearly, recognised the value of these services. Issue11|2015 A charitable Chancellor! Indirect Tax Update
© 2015 Grant
Thornton UK LLP. All rights reserved. ‘Grant Thornton’ refers to the brand under which the Grant Thornton member firms provide assurance, tax and advisory services to their clients and/or refers to one or more member firms, as the context requires. Grant Thornton UK LLP is a member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd (GTIL). GTIL and the member firms are not a worldwide partnership. GTIL and each member firm is a separate legal entity. Services are delivered by the member firms. GTIL does not provide services to clients. GTIL and its member firms are not agents of, and do not obligate, one another and are not liable for one another’s acts or omissions. This publication has been prepared only as a guide. No responsibility can be accepted by us for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from acting as a result of any material in this publication. grant-thornton.co.uk GRT100456 Partial exemption methods Draft legislation HMRC has announced that it intends to introduce legislation which will limit the recovery of input tax by UK businesses with foreign branches. Currently, UK law allows VAT incurred on the purchase of goods or services, which is attributable to supplies made outside the UK, but which would be taxable if made in the UK, to be reclaimed. The proposed legislation will alter the basis of VAT recovery in such situations. The draft legislation is intended to bring the UK law into line with the judgment of the Court of Justice in the recent case involving Credit Lyonnais. In that case, the Court confirmed that the taxpayer was not entitled to include taxable turnover generated by foreign branches in either the numerator or the denominator of its partial exemption formula. According to HMRC's explanatory notes accompanying the draft statutory instrument, these amendments will mean that deduction of input tax on overhead costs used to support the activities of foreign establishments of a business can only be calculated by reference to supplies made by that business’s UK establishments. Assuming the draft proposals are adopted, businesses that currently include 'foreign' supplies in their partial exemption formulae will, in due course, need to amend their methods and, where necessary, agree a new special method with HMRC. Comment The VAT Directive provides for input VAT recovery where the cost is attributable to taxable supplies wherever they are made. This ensures the neutrality of the VAT system. The CJEU confirmed in Credit Lyonnais that the formula to determine the deductible proportion of input tax cannot include turnover generated from overseas establishments.First-tier Tribunal round up Comment The first case highlights the fact that HMRC occasionally require information. If they do not receive it, they are acting reasonably if the refuse an application. The second case demonstrates the importance of keeping a contemporaneous note of any dealings with HMRC. The final case confirms that VAT can only be reclaimed as input tax if it relates to supplies made by a taxable person. The FTT has been busy this week releasing a number of interesting decisions. In the case of RCM Worldwide Trading Ltd, the taxpayer had appealed against HMRC's refusal to grant it a WOWGR (effectively permission to operate an Excise warehouse). The question was whether HMRC's decision was reasonable. The Tribunal considered that the taxpayer's inability or refusal to provide information requested by HMRC in order to consider the application meant that HMRC's decision was not unreasonable. In R. McDonald & A. McDevitt t/a The Picnic Basket, the issue was whether the taxpayer had operated the correct retail scheme. The taxpayer claimed that its accountant had agreed the use of the method in a phone call with an HMRC officer. HMRC denied that the alleged phone call had taken place and argued that a much greater proportion of the taxpayer's supplies were standard rated than had been declared. The taxpayer could provide no evidence that the phone call had taken place, but even if it had, the Tribunal concluded that there was sufficient information published in the retail scheme public notices, to have informed the taxpayer that the retail scheme it had chosen was incorrect. The appeal was dismissed. In Charles Dorian Lissack, the taxpayer had claimed input VAT on legal fees incurred in respect of a dispute which related to a supply made by him in a period before he was voluntarily registered for VAT. The Tribunal dismissed his appeal. The supply by the Appellant was made at a time when the VAT registration was not effective and as such the VAT on the legal fees fails to constitute input tax. Contact Stuart Brodie Scotland stuart.brodie@uk.gt.com (0)14 1223 0683 Karen Robb London & South East karen.robb@uk.gt.com (0)20 772 82556 Richard Gilroy London & South East richard.gilroy@uk.gt.com (0)20 7728 3170
Advertisement