Advertisement
Indirect Tax Update 11/2015
Indirect Tax Update 11/2015
Upcoming SlideShare
ITU 34/2015ITU 34/2015
Loading in ... 3
1 of 2
Advertisement

More Related Content

Advertisement
Advertisement

Indirect Tax Update 11/2015

  1. © 2015 Grant Thornton UK LLP. All rights reserved. ITU Summary Budget week sees the introduction of new legislation to make certain charities fall within the "section 33" VAT refund scheme. A welcome move which recognises the essential role that these charities perform. The Budget also introduces proposals that will affect UK partly exempt businesses with branches established overseas. The proposed legislation intends to prevent UK businesses from including taxable supplies made by overseas branches from being included in the partial exemption formula. The First-tier Tribunal has also issued a number of fresh and interesting decisions. 23 March 2015 2015 Budget – indirect tax provisions Although there was not a great deal to shout about from an indirect tax point of view in last week's Budget, the Chancellor did announce a number of welcome measures aimed at helping certain qualifying charities to reclaim VAT they incur on non-business activities. Historically, the activities of these charities have been regarded as not constituting an 'economic' or business activity which has meant that VAT incurred on the purchase of goods or services has been an absolute cost. The new arrangements are intended to alleviate that problem and will be welcomed by all concerned. Charities involved in search and rescue (defined as charities whose main purpose is to search for and rescue people at risk of death or serious injury or whose main purpose is to support, develop or promote such charities), will, from 1 April 2015, be entitled to submit a claim to HMRC for VAT incurred in relation to non-business activities. Similarly, air ambulance charities, medical courier charities and charities which provide palliative care services (hospices) will also benefit from the refund scheme. Due to the timing of this year's General Election, the Finance Bill will become the Finance Act in record time and will make charities, which meet certain legal conditions, 'qualifying' charities. In essence, for search and rescue charities, the main condition is that the activities will have to be co-ordinated by a 'relevant' authority (such as the Secretary of State, a Police force or, in Scotland, a Fire and Rescue Service). An air ambulance charity will need to provide air ambulance services pursuant to arrangements made with an NHS body. Medical courier charities will be required to provide services for the transportation of items intended for use for medical purposes, such as blood, medicines and other medical supplies and palliative care charities will be required to provide palliative care to terminally ill patients at the direction of, or under the supervision of a registered medical practitioner or a registered nurse. Provided the conditions are met, qualifying charities will be entitled to submit a claim for the VAT they incur. Some of the charities will also provide goods or services that are regarded as business activities and, in that situation, the new law will require qualifying charities to apportion the VAT between business and non-business activities so that only the input tax attributable to the non-business activities is claimed. VAT at 20% can represent a significant cost to the affected charities which provide essential services. By introducing the refund scheme, the Chancellor has, clearly, recognised the value of these services. Issue11|2015 A charitable Chancellor! Indirect Tax Update
  2. © 2015 Grant Thornton UK LLP. All rights reserved. ‘Grant Thornton’ refers to the brand under which the Grant Thornton member firms provide assurance, tax and advisory services to their clients and/or refers to one or more member firms, as the context requires. Grant Thornton UK LLP is a member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd (GTIL). GTIL and the member firms are not a worldwide partnership. GTIL and each member firm is a separate legal entity. Services are delivered by the member firms. GTIL does not provide services to clients. GTIL and its member firms are not agents of, and do not obligate, one another and are not liable for one another’s acts or omissions. This publication has been prepared only as a guide. No responsibility can be accepted by us for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from acting as a result of any material in this publication. grant-thornton.co.uk GRT100456 Partial exemption methods Draft legislation HMRC has announced that it intends to introduce legislation which will limit the recovery of input tax by UK businesses with foreign branches. Currently, UK law allows VAT incurred on the purchase of goods or services, which is attributable to supplies made outside the UK, but which would be taxable if made in the UK, to be reclaimed. The proposed legislation will alter the basis of VAT recovery in such situations. The draft legislation is intended to bring the UK law into line with the judgment of the Court of Justice in the recent case involving Credit Lyonnais. In that case, the Court confirmed that the taxpayer was not entitled to include taxable turnover generated by foreign branches in either the numerator or the denominator of its partial exemption formula. According to HMRC's explanatory notes accompanying the draft statutory instrument, these amendments will mean that deduction of input tax on overhead costs used to support the activities of foreign establishments of a business can only be calculated by reference to supplies made by that business’s UK establishments. Assuming the draft proposals are adopted, businesses that currently include 'foreign' supplies in their partial exemption formulae will, in due course, need to amend their methods and, where necessary, agree a new special method with HMRC. Comment The VAT Directive provides for input VAT recovery where the cost is attributable to taxable supplies wherever they are made. This ensures the neutrality of the VAT system. The CJEU confirmed in Credit Lyonnais that the formula to determine the deductible proportion of input tax cannot include turnover generated from overseas establishments.First-tier Tribunal round up Comment The first case highlights the fact that HMRC occasionally require information. If they do not receive it, they are acting reasonably if the refuse an application. The second case demonstrates the importance of keeping a contemporaneous note of any dealings with HMRC. The final case confirms that VAT can only be reclaimed as input tax if it relates to supplies made by a taxable person. The FTT has been busy this week releasing a number of interesting decisions. In the case of RCM Worldwide Trading Ltd, the taxpayer had appealed against HMRC's refusal to grant it a WOWGR (effectively permission to operate an Excise warehouse). The question was whether HMRC's decision was reasonable. The Tribunal considered that the taxpayer's inability or refusal to provide information requested by HMRC in order to consider the application meant that HMRC's decision was not unreasonable. In R. McDonald & A. McDevitt t/a The Picnic Basket, the issue was whether the taxpayer had operated the correct retail scheme. The taxpayer claimed that its accountant had agreed the use of the method in a phone call with an HMRC officer. HMRC denied that the alleged phone call had taken place and argued that a much greater proportion of the taxpayer's supplies were standard rated than had been declared. The taxpayer could provide no evidence that the phone call had taken place, but even if it had, the Tribunal concluded that there was sufficient information published in the retail scheme public notices, to have informed the taxpayer that the retail scheme it had chosen was incorrect. The appeal was dismissed. In Charles Dorian Lissack, the taxpayer had claimed input VAT on legal fees incurred in respect of a dispute which related to a supply made by him in a period before he was voluntarily registered for VAT. The Tribunal dismissed his appeal. The supply by the Appellant was made at a time when the VAT registration was not effective and as such the VAT on the legal fees fails to constitute input tax. Contact Stuart Brodie Scotland stuart.brodie@uk.gt.com (0)14 1223 0683 Karen Robb London & South East karen.robb@uk.gt.com (0)20 772 82556 Richard Gilroy London & South East richard.gilroy@uk.gt.com (0)20 7728 3170
Advertisement