SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 9
INTRODUCTION TO CRIMINALJUSTICEFINAL TuesdayApril30th 8:00-10:00
Defenses under the criminal law: how do we decide what to call criminal? (pg. 113)
The defenses generally rely on one of the two arguments (1) the defendant is not ________ for the crime , or (2) the defendant was ________ in
committing the crime.
Responsibility _________: I did it, what I did was ______ but because of the terrible circumstances I was operating under the law should give me
a break. (is an important word in Civil proceedings and defenses:________________)
_________: I did it, what I did was _______and the law should commend me for doing it.
Excuse defenses include:_______________________________________________________________________________
Justification defenses include:__________________________________________________________________________
Infancy a defense in which the accused is __________ because he or she is to young to understand __________ of their action.
Common Law: 0-7:___________presumption against your capacity to form _______ ____
7-14:___________presumption against your capacity to form _______ ____ (____-___-_____ basis not bright line)
[---------------------(_______________issues)---------( )__________ ___________---------------(-----------______________)-]
_________ may be a defense to criminal charges when the defendant’s ____ __ ____ is such that he or she cannot claim legal ____________.
Measuring sanity:
(1) Does not _____________________________________________________________________conduct;
(2) Does not ________that his or her _______________________________________________________;or
(3) Is not_____________________________________________________________________________.
The M’Naughten rule (_____,_______) The Irresistible-impulse Test ALI/MPCTest
About __________:rational your thoughts.
Do not know _______ and ___________ of
your actions or (2) you don’t know the
difference between__________________
History/Hinckley:____________________
_________________________________
Obligation to prove Hinckley sane _____ _
___________ ________ (criminal)
About __________:rational your thoughts.
About __________:incapacity to control will.
Test is always combined with:____________
Irresistible-impulse is about being_________
Public Perception:____________________
May be found ________ even if was aware the
act was “_________” provided that some
“_______________” resulting from a ____
______________capacity test
Requires defendant lack “__________
_________” to either “________________
_________or conform that conduct “to the
_______________________________.”
Is the ________ test to prove,
besides___________ (only 1 state)
Insanity is an Affirmative defense meaning _______________________________________________________________________
PAGE 115/116
Competency: ____________________________________________________________________________________________
Guilty but Mentally Ill:___________________________________________________________________________
_____________Intoxication: _________________Intoxication: Law Favors
So drunk you are ________, so drunk it ______ mens rea
_________drug or alcohol intoxication is also used to ______ a
defendant though not a ________ in itself, rather just to show ____
_____ was __________.
Burrows v. State 1931:_________________________
State V. Hall 1974:___________________________________
_________________________________________________
Montana v. Egelhoff:________________________________
Occurs when a person is physically forced to ___________0r
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
Competing values of Culpability and ____________
People V. Penman 1915:______________________________
_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
Mistake of Fact Mistake-of-Law
Operates as a defense if it _________ the mental state necessary to
commit the crime.
Jerry Hall: _____________________________________
Have a valid defense if (1) the law was not ________ or __________
known to the public or (2) the person relied on a
_______________________________
(Book)
Child porn exception__________________________________
PAGE 121
Duress: exists when the ____________________________________________________________________________________
It is said to ______ mens rea. For Duress to work it must meet the following requirements:
(1) __________________________________________________________________________________
(2) __________________________________________________________________________________
(3) __________________________________________________________________________________
(4) __________________________________________________________________________________
Bogotá case v. marijuana case:_____________________________________________________________________________
Self-Defense: _________________________________________________________________________________________
Amount of force:________________________________________________________________________________________
Duty to retreat v. Castle doctrine: Minority/Majority_________________________________________________________________
Continuum: _____________________kill---------------------------------------------------Make___________________________
Trey Van Martin Montana: ___________________________________________________________________________
Neccesity:____________________________________________________________________________________________
MPC: viable defense if “the harm or evil sought to be avoided by such conduct is ___________ thanthat sought to be prevented by the law
defining the offense charged. Duress think (_______________) Necessity think (_________________)
The Queen v. Dudley Stephens 1884:______________________________________________________________________________________________
State v. Celli (Deadwood,SD):_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Entrapment:___________________________________________________________________________________________
Sherman v. United States: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Sorrellsv. United States: _________________________________________________________________________________
Predisposition __________ asks where did the __________ originate (_____________test) {Your _______________)
___________test: how outrageous is the ____________ behavior (_____________test)
Hate Crimes:__________________________________________________________________________________________
Is important where it is normally not important:_____________________ Harvey and Cliff:_____________________________
Common wealth v. Burnett:_________________________________________________________________________
Policing:
Most __________ form of government. Continuum of police discrimination: (below)
_____________________----------------------------------____________________________--------------________________________
Florida curb example:______________________________________________________________________________________
Police respond to situations with ______________justified forced but ____-______________ force is the ________ that runs through all
police work. Daily duties compared to perceptions from TV:___________________________________________________(6th sense…
Implementation of theories/policies: __________________________________________________________________________
Bittner’s identified basic police responsibilities:
1) _________________ 2) ___________________ 3)______________________ 4) ____________________
Open Wounds case:______________________________________________________________________________________
141 James Baldwin quote:_________________________________________________________________________________
The Blue Curtain of police work:________________________________________________________________________
Justification for police discretion:
1)________________________________________ 2)____________________________________________
3)________________________________________ 4)____________________________________________
__________________________________ _________________________________________
__________________________________ _________________________________________
 Discretion in Pursuit:______________________________________________________________
 Shift in Domestic Violence discretion:___________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
o ______________________
o ______________________
o ______________________
 Severity of act Demeanor Vict/Off Relationship Policy: Are all___________________________________
 You cannot get rid of it________________________________________ but you can direct it
 Gratitude v. Corruption (quide quo duo)____________________________________________ Dirty Harry
problem……Ghandi, “The
means______________________________________________________________________
Scott V. Harris:________________________________________________________________________________
Officer can be sued in ______ court only if conduct is so outrageous that it _____ the _________. (chance of winning?___________)
(Review Civil v. Criminal burdens/punishments/who brings the charges)
You be the Officer (173): Whether the officer had an _________ to make the arrest they said __. Has to ____ _ the _________ by being so
egregious.
Tennessee v. Garner (landmark):__________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Michigan v. Fisher (216):__________________________________________________________________________ __________________________
Oliver Wendell Holmes: Your right to be___________________________ /inner outer circle examples. (harm) Crime control/Due process
Often times crime fighting is about getting _________________ and the question is how much do we slow down the government.
****THE FOURTH AMENDMENT***:
Two critical legal concepts: a prohibition against ___________ ________________ and the requirement of _____________________
Protects you only against the ______________ not P__________.
Probable Cause: exists if there is a substantial likelihood (1)_______________________(2)________________________________
Sources of Probable Cause: (whenthe mist becomes________________) must have an ___________basis
1) _________________________________________ 2) ________________________________________________
3) __________________________________________ 4) _________________________________________________
Thomson V. Louisiana: ___________________________________________________________________________________
Exclusionary Rule:_______________________________________________________________________________________
Fruit of the Poisonous tree doctrine: __________________________________________________________________________
Test of Degree:_____________________________________Attenuation:______________________________________
(wolfe) Mapp V. Ohio 1966:______________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Expand Exclusionary: _______________________________ Weaken Exclusionary (2):____________________________________
Inevitable Discovery:_______________________________________________________________________________________
Brewer v. Williams (1977):_________________________________________________________________________
Brewer v. Nix (1984):____________________________________________________________________________
“Good Faith” Exception :____________________________________________________________________________(bookcases)
A Hunch ________________________---------------------_____________________________--------_________________________
(what sense?_______) Needed to stop:____________________ To arrest:__________________
Stop and frisk are__________ actions. (pg.223) Constitutionally protected?______ Constitutionally protected?______
Frisks are meant to be ______________ measures not _____________ means of finding evidence.
Justice Cardozo:_________________________________ Justice Holmes:_________________________________________________________________
Terry V. Ohio (1968): ____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Totality of the Circumstances Test: (building a brick wall ______________) _______________________________________________
U.S. v. Arvizu (book): ___________________________________________________________________
Florida v. J.L: (informant)____________________________________________________________________________________________________
S.b.1070/Sam Walker/Discrimination continuum:___________________________________________________________________
U.S v. Place:________________________________________________________________________________________
U.S v. Hibble:________________________________________________________________________________________
Supreme Court said about warrants: Police, you aways______________________________________________________________
Exceptions have grown so large they_________ the rule. Big Six (7.4) 231
Arrest Incident to Lawful Arrest:______________________________________________________________________________
United States v. Robison:_____________________________________________________________________________
1.________________________________________ 2._______________________________________________
Chimel v.California:_________________________________________________________________________________
Consent Searches:______________ Has to be_____________not ____________ &_____________________
Schneckloth v. Bustamonte:____________________________________________________________________________
State v. Stone(s):____________________________________________________________________________
Intimidation/coercion:
Florida v. Bostick (1971):_________________________________________________________________
Ohio v. Robinette (1996):_________________________________________________________________
PRIVACY:
Katz v. United States (1967):_______________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Two Prong Test: 1.________________________________________ (_____________)
2.________________________________________ (_____________)
California v. Greenwood (1988):_______________________________________________________________________________
Founding Fathers v. Common Law warrants:_____________________________________________________________________
Four categories of items can be seized by use of a search warrant: (Specificity)
1)___________________________________________________ 2)_________________________________________
3)___________________________________________________ 4)_________________________________________
Two most important warrant exceptions (1) __________to _________ arrest [_________] (2) ____________ searches [____________]
4th & Automobiles:
Carroll v. United State(1925): _________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________ ___________+ ____________ circumstances= Automobile exception (diminished expectation in auto)
Belton V. N.Y. 1981: (B________):______________________________________________________________________
Arizona v. Gant 2009:_______________ _________________________________________________________________
Warrantless only if: 1)____________________________________ 2)______________________________________
Whren V. United States (1996):__________________________________________________________________________
Could…..would:________________________________________________________________________________
Maryland v. Wilson (1997): _____________________________________________________________________________
U.S. v. Ross (bandit case):______________________________________________________________________________
Plain view….smell….sight….:
Coolidge v. N.H.:____________________________________ Four criteria for warrantless seizure:
1.____________________________________________ 2.___________________________________________
3.____________________________________________ 4.__________________________________________
Kyllo v. U.S.:_______________________________________________________________________________________
The 5th Amendment:
Brown V. Mississippi 1936:____________________________________________________________________________40 cases
Escobedo v. Illinois (1964): (what amendment: ____)_Prong?__________________________________________________________
Miranda v. Arizona (1966): (what amendment:____)_______________________________________________________________
_______________+________________=_________________
Law Enforcement response: Con________________, De-_____________________, Per_______________________
Miranda is not required for:
1._________________________________________________________________
2._________________________________________________________________
3._________________________________________________________________
4._________________________________________________________________
5._________________________________________________________________
Waiving Miranda must be:________________________________________________
Davis v. U.S.:_____________________________________________________
Berghuis v. Thompkins:______________________________________________
Doody v. Schrero:__________________________________________________
New York v. Quarles 242:_____________________________________________
Rep. enemy Combatants--------_______________----------------_____________________-----------____________
Prophylactic v. merely prophylactic not constitutionally demanded.
Hiarchry of 4th, 5th, 6th actually looks like _____, ________, _________.
SENTENCING:
 Retribution:____________________________________________________________________________________
 Deterence: (think theories/classical, updated…)____________________________________________________________
 3 things you need to make deterrence work:_______________, _______________,_________________
o General:____________________________________________
o Specific:_____________________________________________
 Incapacitation:__________________________________________________________________________________
 Rehabilitation (Jim story/ Due process):________________________________________________________________
Quotes and past concepts:
Aristotle, MLK equality: Consensus/Conflict Jonathan Swift/Jeffery Rieman Integrated Def. crime Wedding Cake Model
Crime Control/ Due Process: (Packer) & Sentencing B. Franklin Patriot Act. Causation/correlation
Adversarial v. inquisitorial. Clarence Darrow Zimmerman Usual suspects.
Types of crime: (white collar…) Distinguish betweenassault/battery, larceny/burglary.____________________________________
Inchoate Offense (correct order)
Theories: Abortion Classical utilitarianism Positivism Seduction twin/adoption arenas of choice
Chicago umbrella: Social Dis, Strain, Cultural deviance Social process: learned, control, label (Roche book)
Deterrence: Se______, Cel________, Cer__________ Linden Johnson quote:
Zimbardo experiments (2) H.L. Mencken “ poverty caused by”
Life Course/Shakespeare Victimization/repeat Mala en se/mala prohibita (what matters) Justice is often about_________
UCR/NIBRS/NCVS/SelfR Justice lived experience of (3) Precedent umbrella
Mia Angelu: Civil/Criminal Stolen Valor Lawrence v. Texas…Bowers v. ….. Grizzwold v. conn.
Commission/Omission Legal duty +________=liability thoughts are______
Ralf Waldo: “the ancestor..” Holmes; mens rea prenumbra 4 (SL) levels of Mens rea+SL Chain of proximate causation
Kibbe v. People Shillelagh Sources of law codification Corpus Delicti Gandhi
________________“Ifyou deliberately plan to be less than you are capable of being than I warn you, you will be deeply unhappy for the rest of
your life.”
FINAL IS TUESDAY APRIL 30, 8-10 IN THE SAME ROOM. SI SESSIONS ARE Saturday AND Sunday FROM 3-5 IN THE SAME ROOM. I will be
available for additional clarification by email: eric.schlimgen@usd.edu and in the library from on the first floor Tuesday from 2-4.

More Related Content

What's hot (7)

Answering Questions
Answering QuestionsAnswering Questions
Answering Questions
 
04 quiz 1
04 quiz 104 quiz 1
04 quiz 1
 
Year 5 paper 2( mid year)
Year 5 paper 2( mid year)Year 5 paper 2( mid year)
Year 5 paper 2( mid year)
 
Questionnaire
Questionnaire Questionnaire
Questionnaire
 
Feedback questionnaire
Feedback questionnaireFeedback questionnaire
Feedback questionnaire
 
Pi028(1)(1)-Verdict Sheet
Pi028(1)(1)-Verdict SheetPi028(1)(1)-Verdict Sheet
Pi028(1)(1)-Verdict Sheet
 
Level 2
Level 2Level 2
Level 2
 

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (13)

Budget Critique Portland
Budget Critique PortlandBudget Critique Portland
Budget Critique Portland
 
Tennis kaisa
Tennis kaisaTennis kaisa
Tennis kaisa
 
Team 5-1
Team 5-1Team 5-1
Team 5-1
 
La obesidad
La obesidadLa obesidad
La obesidad
 
MPA Analytical GRANT
MPA Analytical GRANTMPA Analytical GRANT
MPA Analytical GRANT
 
Dr V M Tegg CV 2015
Dr V M Tegg CV 2015Dr V M Tegg CV 2015
Dr V M Tegg CV 2015
 
Captsone Report Schlimgen
Captsone Report SchlimgenCaptsone Report Schlimgen
Captsone Report Schlimgen
 
team816
team816team816
team816
 
THE LEARNING TREE AND THE GREENSPAN FLOORTIME APPROACH®
THE LEARNING TREE AND THE GREENSPAN FLOORTIME APPROACH®THE LEARNING TREE AND THE GREENSPAN FLOORTIME APPROACH®
THE LEARNING TREE AND THE GREENSPAN FLOORTIME APPROACH®
 
your_caledon
your_caledonyour_caledon
your_caledon
 
ασπαιτε.παδ2
ασπαιτε.παδ2ασπαιτε.παδ2
ασπαιτε.παδ2
 
Penni Darcy CV
Penni Darcy CVPenni Darcy CV
Penni Darcy CV
 
ασκησεις κατανοησης παδ2
ασκησεις κατανοησης παδ2ασκησεις κατανοησης παδ2
ασκησεις κατανοησης παδ2
 

Similar to CJUS III Final

Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared ResourceLaw-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resourcelawexchange.co.uk
 
Contagion Health Get Up and Move: Social Gaming for Better Health
Contagion Health Get Up and Move: Social Gaming for Better HealthContagion Health Get Up and Move: Social Gaming for Better Health
Contagion Health Get Up and Move: Social Gaming for Better HealthJen McCabe
 
Question 1· Which of the following is the final step in the eth.docx
Question 1· Which of the following is the final step in the eth.docxQuestion 1· Which of the following is the final step in the eth.docx
Question 1· Which of the following is the final step in the eth.docxmakdul
 
Ero chicago citizens academy application[2]
Ero chicago citizens academy application[2]Ero chicago citizens academy application[2]
Ero chicago citizens academy application[2]Greg Siskind
 
Template for debate speech
Template for debate speechTemplate for debate speech
Template for debate speechAlan Cyborg
 
Objection to petition to terminate guardianship of minor, adult, conservators...
Objection to petition to terminate guardianship of minor, adult, conservators...Objection to petition to terminate guardianship of minor, adult, conservators...
Objection to petition to terminate guardianship of minor, adult, conservators...screaminc
 
Md questionnaire
Md questionnaireMd questionnaire
Md questionnaireSarah Cline
 
Kids Therapy Forms | Initial Questionnaire
Kids Therapy Forms | Initial QuestionnaireKids Therapy Forms | Initial Questionnaire
Kids Therapy Forms | Initial QuestionnaireMy Kids Therapy
 
Criminal Notice of Appeal Form A.pdf
Criminal Notice of Appeal Form A.pdfCriminal Notice of Appeal Form A.pdf
Criminal Notice of Appeal Form A.pdfTodd Spodek
 
Go #11 civil criminal 2011 2012
Go #11 civil criminal 2011 2012Go #11 civil criminal 2011 2012
Go #11 civil criminal 2011 2012mrgault
 
1crimescenebasicswkst
1crimescenebasicswkst1crimescenebasicswkst
1crimescenebasicswkstMrs. Henley
 
Feelings: worksheet
Feelings: worksheetFeelings: worksheet
Feelings: worksheetA. Simoes
 
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS DIVISION OF DOMESTIC RELATIONS C.docx
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS DIVISION OF DOMESTIC RELATIONS C.docxCOURT OF COMMON PLEAS DIVISION OF DOMESTIC RELATIONS C.docx
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS DIVISION OF DOMESTIC RELATIONS C.docxfaithxdunce63732
 
Pardon form
Pardon formPardon form
Pardon formrkb423
 
Holbert Biology
Holbert BiologyHolbert Biology
Holbert Biologydholbert
 
Web page application
Web page applicationWeb page application
Web page applicationCHu Di
 
NJ Shore Fit Health History Forms
NJ Shore Fit Health History FormsNJ Shore Fit Health History Forms
NJ Shore Fit Health History FormsDonald Shrump
 
3.1 Reading Guide
3.1 Reading Guide3.1 Reading Guide
3.1 Reading Guidejrt004
 
Death certificate(insurance)
Death certificate(insurance)Death certificate(insurance)
Death certificate(insurance)Rajkumar Kamarsu
 

Similar to CJUS III Final (20)

Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared ResourceLaw-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
 
Contagion Health Get Up and Move: Social Gaming for Better Health
Contagion Health Get Up and Move: Social Gaming for Better HealthContagion Health Get Up and Move: Social Gaming for Better Health
Contagion Health Get Up and Move: Social Gaming for Better Health
 
Question 1· Which of the following is the final step in the eth.docx
Question 1· Which of the following is the final step in the eth.docxQuestion 1· Which of the following is the final step in the eth.docx
Question 1· Which of the following is the final step in the eth.docx
 
Ero chicago citizens academy application[2]
Ero chicago citizens academy application[2]Ero chicago citizens academy application[2]
Ero chicago citizens academy application[2]
 
Template for debate speech
Template for debate speechTemplate for debate speech
Template for debate speech
 
Objection to petition to terminate guardianship of minor, adult, conservators...
Objection to petition to terminate guardianship of minor, adult, conservators...Objection to petition to terminate guardianship of minor, adult, conservators...
Objection to petition to terminate guardianship of minor, adult, conservators...
 
Md questionnaire
Md questionnaireMd questionnaire
Md questionnaire
 
Kids Therapy Forms | Initial Questionnaire
Kids Therapy Forms | Initial QuestionnaireKids Therapy Forms | Initial Questionnaire
Kids Therapy Forms | Initial Questionnaire
 
Criminal Notice of Appeal Form A.pdf
Criminal Notice of Appeal Form A.pdfCriminal Notice of Appeal Form A.pdf
Criminal Notice of Appeal Form A.pdf
 
Go #11 civil criminal 2011 2012
Go #11 civil criminal 2011 2012Go #11 civil criminal 2011 2012
Go #11 civil criminal 2011 2012
 
1crimescenebasicswkst
1crimescenebasicswkst1crimescenebasicswkst
1crimescenebasicswkst
 
Feelings: worksheet
Feelings: worksheetFeelings: worksheet
Feelings: worksheet
 
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS DIVISION OF DOMESTIC RELATIONS C.docx
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS DIVISION OF DOMESTIC RELATIONS C.docxCOURT OF COMMON PLEAS DIVISION OF DOMESTIC RELATIONS C.docx
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS DIVISION OF DOMESTIC RELATIONS C.docx
 
Pardon form
Pardon formPardon form
Pardon form
 
Holbert Biology
Holbert BiologyHolbert Biology
Holbert Biology
 
Web page application
Web page applicationWeb page application
Web page application
 
NJ Shore Fit Health History Forms
NJ Shore Fit Health History FormsNJ Shore Fit Health History Forms
NJ Shore Fit Health History Forms
 
3.1 Reading Guide
3.1 Reading Guide3.1 Reading Guide
3.1 Reading Guide
 
New Patient Welcome Packet
New Patient Welcome PacketNew Patient Welcome Packet
New Patient Welcome Packet
 
Death certificate(insurance)
Death certificate(insurance)Death certificate(insurance)
Death certificate(insurance)
 

CJUS III Final

  • 1. INTRODUCTION TO CRIMINALJUSTICEFINAL TuesdayApril30th 8:00-10:00 Defenses under the criminal law: how do we decide what to call criminal? (pg. 113) The defenses generally rely on one of the two arguments (1) the defendant is not ________ for the crime , or (2) the defendant was ________ in committing the crime. Responsibility _________: I did it, what I did was ______ but because of the terrible circumstances I was operating under the law should give me a break. (is an important word in Civil proceedings and defenses:________________) _________: I did it, what I did was _______and the law should commend me for doing it. Excuse defenses include:_______________________________________________________________________________ Justification defenses include:__________________________________________________________________________ Infancy a defense in which the accused is __________ because he or she is to young to understand __________ of their action. Common Law: 0-7:___________presumption against your capacity to form _______ ____ 7-14:___________presumption against your capacity to form _______ ____ (____-___-_____ basis not bright line) [---------------------(_______________issues)---------( )__________ ___________---------------(-----------______________)-] _________ may be a defense to criminal charges when the defendant’s ____ __ ____ is such that he or she cannot claim legal ____________. Measuring sanity: (1) Does not _____________________________________________________________________conduct; (2) Does not ________that his or her _______________________________________________________;or (3) Is not_____________________________________________________________________________. The M’Naughten rule (_____,_______) The Irresistible-impulse Test ALI/MPCTest About __________:rational your thoughts. Do not know _______ and ___________ of your actions or (2) you don’t know the difference between__________________ History/Hinckley:____________________ _________________________________ Obligation to prove Hinckley sane _____ _ ___________ ________ (criminal) About __________:rational your thoughts. About __________:incapacity to control will. Test is always combined with:____________ Irresistible-impulse is about being_________ Public Perception:____________________ May be found ________ even if was aware the act was “_________” provided that some “_______________” resulting from a ____ ______________capacity test Requires defendant lack “__________ _________” to either “________________ _________or conform that conduct “to the _______________________________.” Is the ________ test to prove, besides___________ (only 1 state) Insanity is an Affirmative defense meaning _______________________________________________________________________ PAGE 115/116 Competency: ____________________________________________________________________________________________
  • 2. Guilty but Mentally Ill:___________________________________________________________________________ _____________Intoxication: _________________Intoxication: Law Favors So drunk you are ________, so drunk it ______ mens rea _________drug or alcohol intoxication is also used to ______ a defendant though not a ________ in itself, rather just to show ____ _____ was __________. Burrows v. State 1931:_________________________ State V. Hall 1974:___________________________________ _________________________________________________ Montana v. Egelhoff:________________________________ Occurs when a person is physically forced to ___________0r _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________ Competing values of Culpability and ____________ People V. Penman 1915:______________________________ _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________ Mistake of Fact Mistake-of-Law Operates as a defense if it _________ the mental state necessary to commit the crime. Jerry Hall: _____________________________________ Have a valid defense if (1) the law was not ________ or __________ known to the public or (2) the person relied on a _______________________________ (Book) Child porn exception__________________________________ PAGE 121 Duress: exists when the ____________________________________________________________________________________ It is said to ______ mens rea. For Duress to work it must meet the following requirements: (1) __________________________________________________________________________________ (2) __________________________________________________________________________________ (3) __________________________________________________________________________________ (4) __________________________________________________________________________________ Bogotá case v. marijuana case:_____________________________________________________________________________ Self-Defense: _________________________________________________________________________________________ Amount of force:________________________________________________________________________________________
  • 3. Duty to retreat v. Castle doctrine: Minority/Majority_________________________________________________________________ Continuum: _____________________kill---------------------------------------------------Make___________________________ Trey Van Martin Montana: ___________________________________________________________________________ Neccesity:____________________________________________________________________________________________ MPC: viable defense if “the harm or evil sought to be avoided by such conduct is ___________ thanthat sought to be prevented by the law defining the offense charged. Duress think (_______________) Necessity think (_________________) The Queen v. Dudley Stephens 1884:______________________________________________________________________________________________ State v. Celli (Deadwood,SD):_______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Entrapment:___________________________________________________________________________________________ Sherman v. United States: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Sorrellsv. United States: _________________________________________________________________________________ Predisposition __________ asks where did the __________ originate (_____________test) {Your _______________) ___________test: how outrageous is the ____________ behavior (_____________test) Hate Crimes:__________________________________________________________________________________________ Is important where it is normally not important:_____________________ Harvey and Cliff:_____________________________ Common wealth v. Burnett:_________________________________________________________________________ Policing: Most __________ form of government. Continuum of police discrimination: (below) _____________________----------------------------------____________________________--------------________________________ Florida curb example:______________________________________________________________________________________ Police respond to situations with ______________justified forced but ____-______________ force is the ________ that runs through all police work. Daily duties compared to perceptions from TV:___________________________________________________(6th sense…
  • 4. Implementation of theories/policies: __________________________________________________________________________ Bittner’s identified basic police responsibilities: 1) _________________ 2) ___________________ 3)______________________ 4) ____________________ Open Wounds case:______________________________________________________________________________________ 141 James Baldwin quote:_________________________________________________________________________________ The Blue Curtain of police work:________________________________________________________________________ Justification for police discretion: 1)________________________________________ 2)____________________________________________ 3)________________________________________ 4)____________________________________________ __________________________________ _________________________________________ __________________________________ _________________________________________  Discretion in Pursuit:______________________________________________________________  Shift in Domestic Violence discretion:___________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ o ______________________ o ______________________ o ______________________  Severity of act Demeanor Vict/Off Relationship Policy: Are all___________________________________  You cannot get rid of it________________________________________ but you can direct it  Gratitude v. Corruption (quide quo duo)____________________________________________ Dirty Harry problem……Ghandi, “The means______________________________________________________________________ Scott V. Harris:________________________________________________________________________________ Officer can be sued in ______ court only if conduct is so outrageous that it _____ the _________. (chance of winning?___________) (Review Civil v. Criminal burdens/punishments/who brings the charges) You be the Officer (173): Whether the officer had an _________ to make the arrest they said __. Has to ____ _ the _________ by being so egregious. Tennessee v. Garner (landmark):__________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________
  • 5. Michigan v. Fisher (216):__________________________________________________________________________ __________________________ Oliver Wendell Holmes: Your right to be___________________________ /inner outer circle examples. (harm) Crime control/Due process Often times crime fighting is about getting _________________ and the question is how much do we slow down the government. ****THE FOURTH AMENDMENT***: Two critical legal concepts: a prohibition against ___________ ________________ and the requirement of _____________________ Protects you only against the ______________ not P__________. Probable Cause: exists if there is a substantial likelihood (1)_______________________(2)________________________________ Sources of Probable Cause: (whenthe mist becomes________________) must have an ___________basis 1) _________________________________________ 2) ________________________________________________ 3) __________________________________________ 4) _________________________________________________ Thomson V. Louisiana: ___________________________________________________________________________________ Exclusionary Rule:_______________________________________________________________________________________ Fruit of the Poisonous tree doctrine: __________________________________________________________________________ Test of Degree:_____________________________________Attenuation:______________________________________ (wolfe) Mapp V. Ohio 1966:______________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Expand Exclusionary: _______________________________ Weaken Exclusionary (2):____________________________________ Inevitable Discovery:_______________________________________________________________________________________ Brewer v. Williams (1977):_________________________________________________________________________ Brewer v. Nix (1984):____________________________________________________________________________ “Good Faith” Exception :____________________________________________________________________________(bookcases) A Hunch ________________________---------------------_____________________________--------_________________________ (what sense?_______) Needed to stop:____________________ To arrest:__________________ Stop and frisk are__________ actions. (pg.223) Constitutionally protected?______ Constitutionally protected?______ Frisks are meant to be ______________ measures not _____________ means of finding evidence. Justice Cardozo:_________________________________ Justice Holmes:_________________________________________________________________
  • 6. Terry V. Ohio (1968): ____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Totality of the Circumstances Test: (building a brick wall ______________) _______________________________________________ U.S. v. Arvizu (book): ___________________________________________________________________ Florida v. J.L: (informant)____________________________________________________________________________________________________ S.b.1070/Sam Walker/Discrimination continuum:___________________________________________________________________ U.S v. Place:________________________________________________________________________________________ U.S v. Hibble:________________________________________________________________________________________ Supreme Court said about warrants: Police, you aways______________________________________________________________ Exceptions have grown so large they_________ the rule. Big Six (7.4) 231 Arrest Incident to Lawful Arrest:______________________________________________________________________________ United States v. Robison:_____________________________________________________________________________ 1.________________________________________ 2._______________________________________________ Chimel v.California:_________________________________________________________________________________ Consent Searches:______________ Has to be_____________not ____________ &_____________________ Schneckloth v. Bustamonte:____________________________________________________________________________ State v. Stone(s):____________________________________________________________________________ Intimidation/coercion: Florida v. Bostick (1971):_________________________________________________________________ Ohio v. Robinette (1996):_________________________________________________________________ PRIVACY: Katz v. United States (1967):_______________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________ Two Prong Test: 1.________________________________________ (_____________) 2.________________________________________ (_____________) California v. Greenwood (1988):_______________________________________________________________________________
  • 7. Founding Fathers v. Common Law warrants:_____________________________________________________________________ Four categories of items can be seized by use of a search warrant: (Specificity) 1)___________________________________________________ 2)_________________________________________ 3)___________________________________________________ 4)_________________________________________ Two most important warrant exceptions (1) __________to _________ arrest [_________] (2) ____________ searches [____________] 4th & Automobiles: Carroll v. United State(1925): _________________________________________________________________________________________________ ___________ ___________+ ____________ circumstances= Automobile exception (diminished expectation in auto) Belton V. N.Y. 1981: (B________):______________________________________________________________________ Arizona v. Gant 2009:_______________ _________________________________________________________________ Warrantless only if: 1)____________________________________ 2)______________________________________ Whren V. United States (1996):__________________________________________________________________________ Could…..would:________________________________________________________________________________ Maryland v. Wilson (1997): _____________________________________________________________________________ U.S. v. Ross (bandit case):______________________________________________________________________________ Plain view….smell….sight….: Coolidge v. N.H.:____________________________________ Four criteria for warrantless seizure: 1.____________________________________________ 2.___________________________________________ 3.____________________________________________ 4.__________________________________________ Kyllo v. U.S.:_______________________________________________________________________________________ The 5th Amendment: Brown V. Mississippi 1936:____________________________________________________________________________40 cases Escobedo v. Illinois (1964): (what amendment: ____)_Prong?__________________________________________________________ Miranda v. Arizona (1966): (what amendment:____)_______________________________________________________________ _______________+________________=_________________ Law Enforcement response: Con________________, De-_____________________, Per_______________________
  • 8. Miranda is not required for: 1._________________________________________________________________ 2._________________________________________________________________ 3._________________________________________________________________ 4._________________________________________________________________ 5._________________________________________________________________ Waiving Miranda must be:________________________________________________ Davis v. U.S.:_____________________________________________________ Berghuis v. Thompkins:______________________________________________ Doody v. Schrero:__________________________________________________ New York v. Quarles 242:_____________________________________________ Rep. enemy Combatants--------_______________----------------_____________________-----------____________ Prophylactic v. merely prophylactic not constitutionally demanded. Hiarchry of 4th, 5th, 6th actually looks like _____, ________, _________. SENTENCING:  Retribution:____________________________________________________________________________________  Deterence: (think theories/classical, updated…)____________________________________________________________  3 things you need to make deterrence work:_______________, _______________,_________________ o General:____________________________________________ o Specific:_____________________________________________  Incapacitation:__________________________________________________________________________________  Rehabilitation (Jim story/ Due process):________________________________________________________________
  • 9. Quotes and past concepts: Aristotle, MLK equality: Consensus/Conflict Jonathan Swift/Jeffery Rieman Integrated Def. crime Wedding Cake Model Crime Control/ Due Process: (Packer) & Sentencing B. Franklin Patriot Act. Causation/correlation Adversarial v. inquisitorial. Clarence Darrow Zimmerman Usual suspects. Types of crime: (white collar…) Distinguish betweenassault/battery, larceny/burglary.____________________________________ Inchoate Offense (correct order) Theories: Abortion Classical utilitarianism Positivism Seduction twin/adoption arenas of choice Chicago umbrella: Social Dis, Strain, Cultural deviance Social process: learned, control, label (Roche book) Deterrence: Se______, Cel________, Cer__________ Linden Johnson quote: Zimbardo experiments (2) H.L. Mencken “ poverty caused by” Life Course/Shakespeare Victimization/repeat Mala en se/mala prohibita (what matters) Justice is often about_________ UCR/NIBRS/NCVS/SelfR Justice lived experience of (3) Precedent umbrella Mia Angelu: Civil/Criminal Stolen Valor Lawrence v. Texas…Bowers v. ….. Grizzwold v. conn. Commission/Omission Legal duty +________=liability thoughts are______ Ralf Waldo: “the ancestor..” Holmes; mens rea prenumbra 4 (SL) levels of Mens rea+SL Chain of proximate causation Kibbe v. People Shillelagh Sources of law codification Corpus Delicti Gandhi ________________“Ifyou deliberately plan to be less than you are capable of being than I warn you, you will be deeply unhappy for the rest of your life.” FINAL IS TUESDAY APRIL 30, 8-10 IN THE SAME ROOM. SI SESSIONS ARE Saturday AND Sunday FROM 3-5 IN THE SAME ROOM. I will be available for additional clarification by email: eric.schlimgen@usd.edu and in the library from on the first floor Tuesday from 2-4.