Digital 2022 Denmark (February 2022) v01

THE ESSENTIAL GUIDE TO THE LATEST CONNECTED BEHAVIOURS
DIGITAL 2022
DENMARK

APP ANNIE SIMILARWEB LOCOWISE SKAI
GWI STATISTA GSMA INTELLIGENCE SEMRUSH
PARTNERS THAT MAKE THE GLOBAL DIGITAL REPORTS SERIES POSSIBLE

DATAREPORTAL.COM/LIBRARY
FIND THOUSANDS OF REPORTS EXPLORING DIGITAL TRENDS IN EVERY COUNTRY IN THE WORLD IN OUR FREE ONLINE LIBRARY:

!
The findings published in this report use the latest data available at the time of production. This may include revised figures
for historical data points that were not available when we published previous reports in the Global Digital Reports series.
From time to time, we may also change the data sources that we use to inform specific data points, and we may also change
how we calculate certain values. Similarly, our data partners may change the ways in which they source, calculate, or report
the data that they share with us. As a result, findings published in this report may not correlate with findings published
in our previous reports, especially where such findings represent change over time (e.g. annual growth). Where we report
figures for change over time, such figures will use the latest available data, so we recommend using the values published
in this report, rather than trying to recalculate such values using data from previous reports. Wherever we’re aware of the
potential for historical mismatches, we’ve included a note on comparability in the footnotes of each relevant slide. Please
read these advisories carefully to understand how data sources or calculations have changed since previous reports, and
beware of making any comparisons with historical data. In addition to changes in data sources and calculations, please
note that social media user numbers may not represent unique individuals. This is because some people may manage
multiple social media accounts, and because some social media accounts may represent ‘non-human’ entities (e.g. businesses,
animals, bands, etc.). As a result, the figures we publish for social media users may exceed the figures we publish for total
population or for internet users. This may seem counter-intuitive, but such differences do not represent mistakes. For more
information, please read our notes on data variance, mismatches, and curiosities: https://datareportal.com/notes-on-data.
IMPORTANT NOTES ON COMPARING DATA

7
7.91 8.28 4.95 4.62
BILLION BILLION BILLION BILLION
+1.0% +2.9% +4.0% +10.1%
57.0% 104.6% 62.5% 58.4%
TOTAL
POPULATION
MOBILE
CONNECTIONS
INTERNET
USERS
ACTIVE SOCIAL
MEDIA USERS
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
URBANISATION TOTAL vs. POPULATION TOTAL vs. POPULATION TOTAL vs. POPULATION
SOURCES: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; GOVERNMENT BODIES; GSMA INTELLIGENCE; ITU; GWI; EUROSTAT; CNNIC; APJII; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; COMPANY ADVERTISING RESOURCES AND
EARNINGS REPORTS; OCDH; TECHRASA; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: SOCIAL MEDIA USERS MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS. COMPARABILITY: SOURCE AND BASE CHANGES.
GLOBAL OVERVIEW
GLOBAL OVERVIEW
OVERVIEW OF THE ADOPTION AND USE OF CONNECTED DEVICES AND SERVICES AT A WORLDWIDE LEVEL
GLOBAL DIGITAL HEADLINES
FEB
2022

8
OCEANIA
SOUTH-EASTERN
ASIA
SOUTHERN
ASIA
EASTERN
ASIA
CENTRAL
ASIA
WESTERN
ASIA
SOUTHERN
AFRICA
EASTERN
AFRICA
MIDDLE
AFRICA
WESTERN
AFRICA
NORTHERN
AFRICA
EASTERN
EUROPE
SOUTHERN
EUROPE
NORTHERN
EUROPE
WESTERN
EUROPE
SOUTHERN
AMERICA
CARIBBEAN
CENTRAL
AMERICA
NORTHERN
AMERICA
73%
72%
73%
46%
66%
66%
26%
24%
42%
63%
86%
87%
98%
94%
75%
66%
70%
92%
72%
SOURCES: KEPIOS ANALYSIS; ITU; GSMA INTELLIGENCE; EUROSTAT; GWI; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; CNNIC; APJII; LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES; UNITED NATIONS. NOTE: REGIONS BASED ON THE UNITED
NATIONS GEOSCHEME. COMPARABILITY: SOURCE AND BASE CHANGES.
GLOBAL OVERVIEW
INTERNET USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION
INTERNET ADOPTION
FEB
2022

9
OCEANIA
SOUTH-EASTERN
ASIA
SOUTHERN
ASIA
EASTERN
ASIA
CENTRAL
ASIA
WESTERN
ASIA
SOUTHERN
AFRICA
EASTERN
AFRICA
MIDDLE
AFRICA
WESTERN
AFRICA
NORTHERN
AFRICA
EASTERN
EUROPE
SOUTHERN
EUROPE
NORTHERN
EUROPE
WESTERN
EUROPE
SOUTHERN
AMERICA
CARIBBEAN
CENTRAL
AMERICA
NORTHERN
AMERICA
0.6%
9.8%
24.7%
18.1%
1.0%
0.9%
2.5%
0.9%
3.6%
3.2%
5.1%
2.7%
2.1%
3.7%
6.6%
0.6%
2.6%
7.0%
4.2%
SOURCES: KEPIOS ANALYSIS; ITU; GSMA INTELLIGENCE; EUROSTAT; GWI; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; CNNIC; APJII; LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES. NOTES: FIGURES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO
ROUNDING. REGIONS BASED ON THE UNITED NATIONS GEOSCHEME. COMPARABILITY: SOURCE AND BASE CHANGES.
GLOBAL OVERVIEW
INTERNET USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL GLOBAL INTERNET USERS
SHARE OF GLOBAL INTERNET USERS
FEB
2022

10
OCEANIA
SOUTH-EASTERN
ASIA
SOUTHERN
ASIA
EASTERN
ASIA
CENTRAL
ASIA
WESTERN
ASIA
SOUTHERN
AFRICA
EASTERN
AFRICA
MIDDLE
AFRICA
WESTERN
AFRICA
NORTHERN
AFRICA
EASTERN
EUROPE
SOUTHERN
EUROPE
NORTHERN
EUROPE
WESTERN
EUROPE
SOUTHERN
AMERICA
CARIBBEAN
CENTRAL
AMERICA
NORTHERN
AMERICA
66%
72%
69%
34%
33%
70%
45%
10%
8%
16%
56%
70%
76%
85%
84%
79%
55%
73%
82%
SOURCES: KEPIOS ANALYSIS; COMPANY ADVERTISING RESOURCES AND ANNOUNCEMENTS; CNNIC; TECHRASA; OCDH. ADVISORY: SOCIAL MEDIA USERS MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS.
NOTES: DOES NOT INCLUDE DATA FOR SUDAN OR SYRIA. REGIONS BASED ON THE UNITED NATIONS GEOSCHEME. COMPARABILITY: SOURCE, BASE, AND METHODOLOGY CHANGES, INCLUDING
SIGNIFICANT SOURCE DATA REVISIONS AND CHANGES IN REPORTING APPROACHES. VALUES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH THOSE PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS. FIGURES FOR LOCAL AND REGIONAL
SOCIAL MEDIA USE RELY ON DIFFERENT DATASETS TO GLOBAL FIGURES.
GLOBAL OVERVIEW
ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION (NOTE: USERS MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS)
SOCIAL MEDIA USERS vs. TOTAL POPULATION
FEB
2022

11
OCEANIA
SOUTH-EASTERN
ASIA
SOUTHERN
ASIA
EASTERN
ASIA
CENTRAL
ASIA
WESTERN
ASIA
SOUTHERN
AFRICA
EASTERN
AFRICA
MIDDLE
AFRICA
WESTERN
AFRICA
NORTHERN
AFRICA
EASTERN
EUROPE
SOUTHERN
EUROPE
NORTHERN
EUROPE
WESTERN
EUROPE
SOUTHERN
AMERICA
CARIBBEAN
CENTRAL
AMERICA
NORTHERN
AMERICA
0.7%
11.6%
27.6%
15.7%
0.6%
4.5%
0.7%
1.1%
0.3%
1.6%
2.8%
4.9%
2.8%
2.1%
3.9%
8.2%
0.6%
3.2%
7.2%
SOURCES: KEPIOS ANALYSIS; COMPANY ADVERTISING RESOURCES AND ANNOUNCEMENTS; CNNIC; TECHRASA; OCDH. ADVISORY: SOCIAL MEDIA USERS MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS.
NOTES: FIGURES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO ROUNDING. DOES NOT INCLUDE DATA FOR SUDAN OR SYRIA. REGIONS BASED ON THE UNITED NATIONS GEOSCHEME. COMPARABILITY: SOURCE, BASE,
AND METHODOLOGY CHANGES, INCLUDING SIGNIFICANT SOURCE DATA REVISIONS AND CHANGES IN REPORTING APPROACHES. VALUES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH THOSE PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS
REPORTS. FIGURES FOR LOCAL AND REGIONAL SOCIAL MEDIA USE RELY ON DIFFERENT DATASETS TO GLOBAL FIGURES.
GLOBAL OVERVIEW
ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS IN EACH REGION AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL GLOBAL ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS
SHARE OF GLOBAL SOCIAL MEDIA USERS
FEB
2022

12
OCEANIA
SOUTH-EASTERN
ASIA
SOUTHERN
ASIA
EASTERN
ASIA
CENTRAL
ASIA
WESTERN
ASIA
SOUTHERN
AFRICA
EASTERN
AFRICA
MIDDLE
AFRICA
WESTERN
AFRICA
NORTHERN
AFRICA
EASTERN
EUROPE
SOUTHERN
EUROPE
NORTHERN
EUROPE
WESTERN
EUROPE
SOUTHERN
AMERICA
CARIBBEAN
CENTRAL
AMERICA
NORTHERN
AMERICA
104%
137%
116%
87%
105%
174%
67%
55%
95%
102%
147%
127%
116%
124%
110%
79%
98%
105%
98%
SOURCES: GSMA INTELLIGENCE; UNITED NATIONS. NOTE: FIGURES MAY EXCEED 100% BECAUSE SOME INDIVIDUALS MAY USE MORE THAN ONE CELLULAR CONNECTION. REGIONS BASED ON THE UNITED
NATIONS GEOSCHEME. COMPARABILITY: BASE CHANGES.
GLOBAL OVERVIEW
CELLULAR MOBILE CONNECTIONS COMPARED WITH TOTAL POPULATION
MOBILE CONNECTIVITY
FEB
2022

ESSENTIAL DATA FOR DIGITAL ADOPTION AND USE IN EVERY COUNTRY IN THE WORLD
DIGITAL 2022
LOCAL COUNTRY HEADLINES REPORT
THE ESSENTIAL GUIDE TO THE WORLD’S CONNECTED BEHAVIOURS
GLOBAL OVERVIEW REPORT
DIGITAL 2022
CLICK HERE TO READ OUR DIGITAL 2022
LOCAL COUNTRY HEADLINES REPORT, WITH
ESSENTIAL STATS FOR DIGITAL ADOPTION
IN EVERY COUNTRY AROUND THE WORLD
CLICK HERE TO READ OUR FLAGSHIP DIGITAL
2022 GLOBAL OVERVIEW REPORT, PACKED
WITH ALL THE NUMBERS YOU NEED TO MAKE
SENSE OF THE CURRENT STATE OF DIGITAL
EXPLORE OUR COMPLETE COLLECTION OF DIGITAL 2022 GLOBAL DATA

_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_
DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022
_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_
WE ARE SOCIAL
T H I N K F O R W A R D 2 0 2 2
BRAVE NEW WORLDS
You’ve heard about the metaverse, right? Actually, 87% of social
media users globally haven’t. But does that even matter, when
businesses from Facebook to Fortnite are vying to stake their
claim in it? What about web3? Or blockchain? Do you know what
an NFT is?
As we’ve renegotiated our relationship with digital in the wake of
Covid-19, from the fringes of the internet, a wealth of new terms
have become mainstays in the marketing press and mainstream
media alike, rushing to alleviate the tensions of our new reality .
We’re at a tipping point, and the gold rush is in full swing.
We’re stepping into Brave New Worlds.
In the seventh issue of our annual report Think Forward, we
unpick the complex and ever-changing web of digital culture and
behaviour, and explore the role brands can play in reﬂecting and
shaping it.
The report was informed by ongoing intelligence from our global
Cultural Insights team, and supported by a survey of 3,000 people
aged 18+ who use social media daily from the US, UK, France,
Italy, China and Australia.
T H E T R E N D S
1. IN-FEED SYLLABUSES
SOCIAL IS BEING REPURPOSED AS A SPACE FOR
SELF-DIRECTED LEARNING
2. THE VIBE ECONOMY
THE CURATION OF MOODS AND FEELINGS HAS BECOME
A COVETED CREATIVE SKILL
3. PRIME TIME PLATFORMS
SOCIAL HAS LEVELLED UP FROM ITS ROLE AS A
SECOND SCREEN
4. SOCIAL CYNICISM
CREATORS ARE FIGHTING TO OVERCOME THE TROPES
OF SOCIAL
5. NEW MATERIALISTS
PEOPLE ARE INVESTING IN DIGITAL CONTENT
AND CREATIVITY
PARTNER CONTENT

16
5.82 8.88 5.77 4.97
MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION
88.4% 152.4% 99.0% 85.3%
URBANISATION vs. POPULATION vs. POPULATION vs. POPULATION
TOTAL
POPULATION
CELLULAR MOBILE
CONNECTIONS
INTERNET
USERS
ACTIVE SOCIAL
MEDIA USERS
EARNINGS REPORTS; OCDH; TECHRASA; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: SOCIAL MEDIA USERS MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS. COMPARABILITY: SOURCE AND BASE CHANGES.
DENMARK
OVERVIEW OF THE ADOPTION AND USE OF CONNECTED DEVICES AND SERVICES
ESSENTIAL DIGITAL HEADLINES
FEB
2022

17
+0.4% +0.9% +0.4% +2.5%
+21 THOUSAND +77 THOUSAND +21 THOUSAND +120 THOUSAND
TOTAL
POPULATION
CELLULAR MOBILE
CONNECTIONS
INTERNET
USERS
ACTIVE SOCIAL
MEDIA USERS
EARNINGS REPORTS; OCDH; TECHRASA; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: DUE TO COVID-19-RELATED DELAYS IN RESEARCH AND REPORTING, FIGURES FOR INTERNET USER GROWTH MAY UNDER-REPRESENT
ACTUAL TRENDS. SEE NOTES ON DATA FOR MORE DETAILS. SOCIAL MEDIA USERS MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS. COMPARABILITY: SOURCE AND BASE CHANGES.
DENMARK
CHANGE IN THE USE OF CONNECTED DEVICES AND SERVICES OVER TIME
DIGITAL GROWTH
FEB
2022

18
88.4% 137.3 99.0% 99.0% 99.0%
5.82 50.3% 49.7% +0.4% 42.3
MILLION +21 THOUSAND
URBAN
POPULATION
POPULATION DENSITY
(PEOPLE PER KM2
)
OVERALL LITERACY
(ADULTS AGED 15+)
FEMALE LITERACY
(ADULTS AGED 15+)
MALE LITERACY
(ADULTS AGED 15+)
TOTAL
POPULATION
FEMALE
POPULATION
MALE
POPULATION
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN TOTAL POPULATION
MEDIAN AGE OF
THE POPULATION
SOURCES: UNITED NATIONS; LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES; WORLD BANK; UNESCO; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; OUR WORLD IN DATA; INDEXMUNDI; KNOEMA.
DENMARK
DEMOGRAPHICS AND OTHER KEY INDICATORS
POPULATION ESSENTIALS
FEB
2022

19
5.60 M 5.62 M 5.65 M 5.68 M 5.70 M 5.72 M 5.74 M 5.76 M 5.78 M 5.80 M 5.82 M
+0.5% +0.5% +0.4% +0.4% +0.4% +0.4% +0.3% +0.3% +0.4% +0.4%
JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
SOURCES: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. NOTE: WHERE LETTERS ARE SHOWN NEXT TO FIGURES ABOVE BARS, “K” DENOTES THOUSANDS
(E.G. “123 K” = 123,000), “M” DENOTES MILLIONS (E.G. “1.23 M” = 1,230,000), AND “B” DENOTES BILLIONS (E.G. “1.23 B” = 1,230,000,000). WHERE NO LETTER IS PRESENT, VALUES ARE SHOWN AS IS.
COMPARABILITY: SOURCE CHANGES AND BASE REVISIONS. FIGURES MAY NOT CORRELATE WITH VALUES PUBLISHED IN OUR PREVIOUS REPORTS.
DENMARK
TOTAL POPULATION AND YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
POPULATION OVER TIME
FEB
2022
DATAREPORTAL

20
13.4% 11.4% 13.3% 13.0% 20.6%
5.82 5.6% 8.3% 5.9% 8.5%
MILLION
65+
55-64
45-54
35-44
25-34
18-24
13-17
5-12
0-4
POPULATION
AGED 25-34
POPULATION
AGED 35-44
POPULATION
AGED 45-54
POPULATION
AGED 55-64
POPULATION
AGED 65+
TOTAL
POPULATION
POPULATION
AGED 0-4
POPULATION
AGED 5-12
POPULATION
AGED 13-17
POPULATION
AGED 18-24
SOURCES: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU; LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES.
DENMARK
SHARE OF THE TOTAL POPULATION BY AGE GROUP
POPULATION BY AGE
FEB
2022

21
28.8% 26.3% 35.3% 15.0% 5.0%
-5.0% (-150 BPS) +12.9% (+300 BPS) -8.1% (-310 BPS) +28.2% (+330 BPS) +72.4% (+210 BPS)
92.6% 91.5% 12.5% 67.4% 49.8%
-4.4% (-430 BPS) -4.5% (-430 BPS) +11.6% (+130 BPS) -9.7% (-720 BPS) -5.1% (-270 BPS)
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
GAMES
CONSOLE
SMART WATCH OR
SMART WRISTBAND
TV STREAMING
DEVICE
SMART HOME
DEVICE
VIRTUAL REALITY
DEVICE
ANY KIND OF
MOBILE PHONE
SMART
PHONE
FEATURE
PHONE
LAPTOP OR
DESKTOP COMPUTER
TABLET
DEVICE
SOURCE: GWI (Q3 2021). FIGURES REPRESENT THE FINDINGS OF A BROAD GLOBAL SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64. SEE GWI.COM FOR FULL DETAILS.
NOTE: PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES REFLECT RELATIVE CHANGE. “BPS” VALUES SHOW THE CHANGE IN BASIS POINTS, AND REFLECT ABSOLUTE CHANGE.
DENMARK
PERCENTAGE OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64 WHO OWN EACH KIND OF DEVICE
DEVICE OWNERSHIP
FEB
2022

22
1H 41M 1H 12M 0H 53M 0H 43M
+32.9% (+25 MINS) +1.4% (+1 MIN) +65.6% (+21 MINS) +13.2% (+5 MINS)
5H 02M 3H 13M 1H 59M 2H 14M
-4.4% (-14 MINS) +4.3% (+8 MINS) +17.8% (+18 MINS) +35.4% (+35 MINS)
TIME SPENT LISTENING TO
MUSIC STREAMING SERVICES
TIME SPENT LISTENING
TO BROADCAST RADIO
TIME SPENT LISTENING
TO PODCASTS
TIME SPENT USING
A GAMES CONSOLE
TIME SPENT USING
THE INTERNET
TIME SPENT WATCHING TELEVISION
(BROADCAST AND STREAMING)
TIME SPENT USING
SOCIAL MEDIA
TIME SPENT READING PRESS MEDIA
(ONLINE AND PHYSICAL PRINT)
SOURCE: GWI (Q3 2021). FIGURES REPRESENT THE FINDINGS OF A BROAD GLOBAL SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64. SEE GWI.COM FOR FULL DETAILS. NOTES: CONSUMPTION OF DIFFERENT MEDIA
MAY OCCUR CONCURRENTLY. TELEVISION INCLUDES BOTH LINEAR (BROADCAST AND CABLE) TELEVISION AND CONTENT DELIVERED VIA STREAMING AND VIDEO-ON-DEMAND SERVICES. PRESS INCLUDES
BOTH ONLINE AND PHYSICAL PRINT MEDIA. BROADCAST RADIO DOES NOT INCLUDE INTERNET RADIO.
DENMARK
THE AVERAGE AMOUNT OF TIME EACH DAY THAT INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64 SPEND WITH DIFFERENT KINDS OF MEDIA AND DEVICES
DAILY TIME SPENT WITH MEDIA
FEB
2022

24
5.77 99.0% +0.4% 5H 02M 85.3%
MILLION +21 THOUSAND -4.4% (-14 MINS)
TOTAL
INTERNET
USERS
INTERNET USERS AS
A PERCENTAGE OF
TOTAL POPULATION
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN THE NUMBER OF
INTERNET USERS
AVERAGE DAILY TIME SPENT
USING THE INTERNET BY
EACH INTERNET USER
PERCENTAGE OF USERS
ACCESSING THE INTERNET
VIA MOBILE PHONES
SOURCES: KEPIOS ANALYSIS; ITU; GSMA INTELLIGENCE; EUROSTAT; GWI; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; CNNIC; APJII; LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES; UNITED NATIONS. TIME SPENT AND MOBILE SHARE DATA
FROM GWI (Q3 2021), BASED ON A BROAD SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64. SEE GWI.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: “YOY” FIGURES SHOW YEAR-ON-YEAR GROWTH. FOR CHANGE IN TIME,
“H” DENOTES HOURS AND “M” DENOTES MINUTES. ADVISORY: DUE TO COVID-19-RELATED DELAYS IN RESEARCH AND REPORTING, FIGURES FOR INTERNET USER GROWTH MAY UNDER-REPRESENT ACTUAL
TRENDS. SEE NOTES ON DATA FOR MORE DETAILS. COMPARABILITY: SOURCE AND BASE CHANGES.
DENMARK
ESSENTIAL INDICATORS OF INTERNET ADOPTION AND USE
OVERVIEW OF INTERNET USE
FEB
2022

25
5.09 M 5.23 M 5.37 M 5.45 M 5.53 M 5.55 M 5.58 M 5.65 M 5.67 M 5.74 M 5.77 M
+2.7% +2.6% +1.5% +1.5% +0.4% +0.5% +1.3% +0.4% +1.3% +0.4%
JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
SOURCES: KEPIOS ANALYSIS; ITU; GSMA INTELLIGENCE; EUROSTAT; GWI; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; CNNIC; APJII; LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES. NOTE: WHERE LETTERS ARE SHOWN NEXT TO FIGURES
ABOVE BARS, “K” DENOTES THOUSANDS (E.G. “123 K” = 123,000), “M” DENOTES MILLIONS (E.G. “1.23 M” = 1,230,000), AND “B” DENOTES BILLIONS (E.G. “1.23 B” = 1,230,000,000). WHERE NO LETTER IS
PRESENT, VALUES ARE SHOWN AS IS. ADVISORY: DUE TO COVID-19-RELATED DELAYS IN RESEARCH AND REPORTING, FIGURES FOR INTERNET USER GROWTH AFTER 2020 MAY UNDER-REPRESENT ACTUAL
TRENDS. SEE NOTES ON DATA FOR MORE DETAILS. COMPARABILITY: SOURCE AND BASE CHANGES. FIGURES MAY NOT MATCH OR CORRELATE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
DENMARK
INTERNET USERS OVER TIME
NUMBER OF INTERNET USERS AND YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
FEB
2022
DATAREPORTAL

26
5.62 5.62 5.65
MILLION MILLION MILLION
96.5% 96.6% 97.0%
vs. POPULATION vs. POPULATION vs. POPULATION
INTERNET USERS:
ITU
INTERNET USERS:
CIA WORLD FACTBOOK
INTERNET USERS:
INTERNETWORLDSTATS
SOURCES: AS STATED ABOVE EACH ICON. NOTES: WHERE SOURCES PUBLISH INTERNET ADOPTION AS A PERCENTAGE (I.E. PENETRATION), WE COMPARE THE LATEST PUBLISHED ADOPTION RATES IN EACH
COUNTRY TO OUR LATEST FIGURES FOR POPULATION TO DERIVE ABSOLUTE USER NUMBERS. WHERE SOURCES PUBLISH ABSOLUTE USER NUMBERS, WE COMPARE THESE ABSOLUTE USER FIGURES TO OUR LATEST
FIGURES FOR POPULATION TO DERIVE VALUES FOR “vs. POPULATION”. COMPARABILITY: POTENTIAL MISMATCHES. INTERNET USER FIGURES QUOTED ELSEWHERE IN THIS REPORT USE DATA FROM MULTIPLE
SOURCES, INCLUDING SOURCES NOT FEATURED ON THIS SLIDE.
DENMARK
INTERNET USER NUMBERS PUBLISHED BY DIFFERENT SOURCES
INTERNET USER PERSPECTIVES
FEB
2022

27
5H 02M 2H 13M 2H 50M 43.9%
DAILY TIME SPENT USING THE
INTERNET ACROSS ALL DEVICES
TIME SPENT USING THE
INTERNET ON MOBILE PHONES
TIME SPENT USING THE INTERNET
ON COMPUTERS AND TABLETS
MOBILE’S SHARE OF TOTAL
DAILY INTERNET TIME
DENMARK
AMOUNT OF TIME THAT INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64 SPEND USING THE INTERNET EACH DAY
DAILY TIME SPENT USING THE INTERNET
FEB
2022

28
65.3%
57.2%
51.2%
51.2%
50.5%
47.1%
45.3%
42.8%
39.7%
38.3%
28.1%
24.5%
22.7%
21.2%
19.0%
FINDING INFORMATION
FOLLOWING NEWS AND CURRENT EVENTS
RESEARCHING HOW TO DO THINGS
STAYING IN TOUCH WITH FRIENDS AND FAMILY
FINDING NEW IDEAS AND INSPIRATION
WATCHING VIDEOS, TV SHOWS, AND MOVIES
RESEARCHING BRANDS
LISTENING TO MUSIC
FILLING UP SPARE TIME
RESEARCHING PLACES AND TRAVEL
MANAGING FINANCES
RESEARCHING HEALTH ISSUES AND PRODUCTS
GAMING
EDUCATION AND STUDY
BUSINESS RESEARCH
DENMARK
PRIMARY REASONS WHY INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64 USE THE INTERNET
MAIN REASONS FOR USING THE INTERNET
FEB
2022

29
70.4% 27.8% 30.9% 11.5% 11.4%
-6.1% (-460 BPS) +0.4% (+10 BPS) +7.7% (+220 BPS) [NEW DATA POINT] +3.6% (+40 BPS)
85.3% 79.1% 83.5% 5.2% 38.8%
-5.6% (-510 BPS) -2.2% (-180 BPS) -5.1% (-450 BPS) +33.3% (+130 BPS) -8.3% (-350 BPS)
MOBILE
PHONE (ANY)
LAPTOP OR
DESKTOP (ANY)
SMART
PHONE
FEATURE
PHONE
TABLET
DEVICE
PERSONAL LAPTOP
OR DESKTOP
WORK LAPTOP
OR DESKTOP
CONNECTED
TELEVISION
SMART HOME
DEVICE
GAMES
CONSOLE
SOURCE: GWI (Q3 2021). FIGURES REPRESENT THE FINDINGS OF A BROAD GLOBAL SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64. SEE GWI.COM FOR FULL DETAILS. NOTES: “MOBILE PHONE (ANY)” INCLUDES
USERS WHO ACCESS VIA A SMARTPHONE OR A FEATURE PHONE. “LAPTOP OR DESKTOP (ANY)” INCLUDES USERS WHO ACCESS VIA THEIR OWN COMPUTER OR A COMPUTER PROVIDED BY THEIR EMPLOYER.
PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES REFLECT RELATIVE CHANGE. “BPS” VALUES SHOW THE CHANGE IN BASIS POINTS, AND REFLECT ABSOLUTE CHANGE.
DENMARK
PERCENTAGE OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64 WHO USE EACH KIND OF DEVICE TO ACCESS THE INTERNET
DEVICES USED TO ACCESS THE INTERNET
FEB
2022

30
81.58 +57.5% 152.31 +36.6%
MBPS +29.79 MBPS MBPS +40.82 MBPS
MEDIAN DOWNLOAD SPEED
OF CELLULAR MOBILE
INTERNET CONNECTIONS
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN MEDIAN CELLULAR MOBILE
INTERNET CONNECTION SPEED
MEDIAN DOWNLOAD
SPEED OF FIXED
INTERNET CONNECTIONS
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN MEDIAN FIXED INTERNET
CONNECTION SPEED
SOURCE: OOKLA. NOTE: FIGURES REPRESENT MEDIAN DOWNLOAD SPEEDS IN MEGABITS PER SECOND (MBPS) IN NOVEMBER 2021. COMPARABILITY: THE VALUES FOR INTERNET CONNECTION SPEEDS THAT
WE FEATURED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS REFLECTED MEAN CONNECTION SPEEDS, WHEREAS WE NOW FEATURE MEDIAN CONNECTION SPEEDS, WHICH OFFER A MORE REPRESENTATIVE INDICATION OF THE
CONNECTION SPEEDS THAT “TYPICAL” USERS CAN EXPECT. AS A RESULT, VALUES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH THE VALUES PUBLISHED IN OUR PREVIOUS REPORTS.
DENMARK
MEDIAN DOWNLOAD SPEEDS (IN MEGABITS PER SECOND) OF MOBILE AND FIXED INTERNET CONNECTIONS
INTERNET CONNECTION SPEEDS
FEB
2022

31
27.40% 70.98% 1.60% 0.02%
+4.2% (+110 BPS) -0.6% (-41 BPS) -29.5% (-67 BPS) -50.0% (-2 BPS)
MOBILE
PHONES
LAPTOP AND
DESKTOP COMPUTERS
TABLET
DEVICES
OTHER
DEVICES
SOURCE: STATCOUNTER. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF WEB PAGES SERVED TO BROWSERS RUNNING ON EACH TYPE OF DEVICE COMPARED WITH THE TOTAL NUMBER OF WEB PAGES SERVED
TO BROWSERS RUNNING ON ANY DEVICE IN NOVEMBER 2021. PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES REPRESENT RELATIVE CHANGE (I.E. AN INCREASE OF 20% FROM A STARTING VALUE OF 50% WOULD EQUAL 60%,
NOT 70%). “BPS” VALUES REPRESENT BASIS POINTS, AND INDICATE THE ABSOLUTE CHANGE. FIGURES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO ROUNDING.
DENMARK
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL WEB PAGES SERVED TO WEB BROWSERS RUNNING ON EACH KIND OF DEVICE
SHARE OF WEB TRAFFIC BY DEVICE
FEB
2022

32
1.18% 1.20% 0.01% 0.62%
-9.2% (-12 BPS) +96.7% (+59 BPS) -66.7% (-2 BPS) -61.0% (-97 BPS)
61.15% 28.68% 4.73% 2.43%
-1.2% (-73 BPS) +0.2% (+7 BPS) +38.3% (+131 BPS) -5.1% (-13 BPS)
SAMSUNG INTERNET OPERA UC BROWSER OTHER
CHROME SAFARI MICROSOFT EDGE FIREFOX
SOURCE: STATCOUNTER. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF PAGE VIEWS SERVED TO EACH BROWSER AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL PAGE VIEWS SERVED TO WEB BROWSERS RUNNING ON ANY KIND
OF DEVICE IN NOVEMBER 2021. PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES REPRESENT RELATIVE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE (I.E. AN INCREASE OF 20% FROM A STARTING VALUE OF 50% WOULD EQUAL 60%, NOT 70%).
“BPS” VALUES REPRESENT BASIS POINTS, AND INDICATE THE ABSOLUTE CHANGE. FIGURES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO ROUNDING.
DENMARK
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL WEB PAGES SERVED TO EACH BRAND OF WEB BROWSER RUNNING ON ANY DEVICE
SHARE OF WEB TRAFFIC BY BROWSER
FEB
2022

33
11 DBA.DK 9.13M 2.25M 14M 12S 6.82
12 POLITIKEN.DK 8.86M 1.94M 9M 05S 2.13
13 JYLLANDS-POSTEN.DK 8.85M 1.70M 9M 28S 2.84
14 REDDIT.COM 8.69M 1.38M 1M 06S 4.05
15 INSTAGRAM.COM 7.85M 1.89M 19M 35S 3.30
16 PORNHUB.COM 7.68M 1.27M 13M 55S 8.79
17 TWITCH.TV 7.02M 664K 7M 14S 2.19
18 LIVE.COM 6.72M 1.10M 9M 11S 4.24
19 OUTLOOK.COM 6.17M 850K 11M 01S 1.49
20 SEOGHOER.DK 6.04M 1.55M 6M 16S 1.85
01 GOOGLE.COM 125M 7.86M 21M 01S 5.32
02 EKSTRABLADET.DK 64.7M 4.05M 12M 56S 4.87
03 BT.DK 44.6M 3.56M 11M 22S 4.71
04 FACEBOOK.COM 44.2M 5.27M 23M 24S 5.00
05 TV2.DK 36.2M 4.31M 10M 00S 2.82
06 YOUTUBE.COM 35.2M 3.33M 8M 52S 3.42
07 DR.DK 28.7M 4.21M 13M 14S 2.64
08 WIKIPEDIA.ORG 20.6M 4.70M 8M 44S 1.90
09 GOOGLE.DK 16.5M 1.99M 16M 37S 6.35
10 BERLINGSKE.DK 9.91M 2.18M 10M 26S 2.21
# WEBSITE
TOTAL
VISITS
UNIQUE
VISITORS
TIME PER
VISIT
PAGES
PER VISIT
# WEBSITE
TOTAL
VISITS
UNIQUE
VISITORS
TIME PER
VISIT
PAGES
PER VISIT
SOURCE: SEMRUSH. FIGURES REPRESENT TRAFFIC VALUES FOR NOVEMBER 2021. NOTE: “UNIQUE VISITORS” REPRESENTS THE NUMBER OF DISTINCT ‘IDENTITIES’ ACCESSING EACH SITE, BUT MAY NOT
REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AS SOME PEOPLE MAY USE MULTIPLE DEVICES OR BROWSERS. ADVISORY: SOME WEBSITES FEATURED IN THIS RANKING MAY CONTAIN ADULT CONTENT. PLEASE USE
CAUTION WHEN VISITING UNKNOWN DOMAINS. COMPARABILITY: SOURCE METHODOLOGY CHANGES. VALUES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS.
DENMARK
MOST-VISITED WEBSITES: SEMRUSH RANKING
RANKING OF THE MOST-VISITED WEBSITES ACCORDING TO SEMRUSH, BASED ON TOTAL MONTHLY WEBSITE TRAFFIC IN NOVEMBER 2021
FEB
2022

34
01 GOOGLE.COM 66.6% 33.4% 2.55% 0.61% 0.49% 0.16% 0.14% 0.08% 0.94% <0.01%
02 EKSTRABLADET.DK 92.1% 7.9% 0.90% 0.05% 0.04% 0.13% 0.02% <0.01% 0.02% <0.01%
03 BT.DK 92.7% 7.3% 0.60% 0.01% 0.04% 0.07% 0.01% <0.01% <0.01% –
04 FACEBOOK.COM 64.0% 36.0% <0.01% 0.05% 0.12% 0.04% 0.03% 0.02% 0.04% <0.01%
05 TV2.DK 84.7% 15.3% 0.97% 0.02% 0.03% 0.21% <0.01% <0.01% 0.03% –
06 YOUTUBE.COM 12.0% 88.0% 0.86% 0.08% 0.04% 0.11% 0.01% <0.01% 0.12% –
07 DR.DK 81.7% 18.3% 0.54% 0.04% 0.02% 0.16% <0.01% <0.01% 0.01% –
08 WIKIPEDIA.ORG 68.9% 31.1% 0.09% <0.01% <0.01% 0.01% <0.01% <0.01% 0.02% –
09 GOOGLE.DK 61.4% 38.6% 0.48% 0.04% <0.01% <0.01% 0.01% <0.01% 0.03% –
10 BERLINGSKE.DK 89.1% 10.9% 0.41% <0.01% <0.01% 0.09% <0.01% <0.01% <0.01% –
# WEBSITE
SHARE OF
TRAFFIC FROM
MOBILES
SHARE OF
TRAFFIC FROM
COMPUTERS
TRAFFIC FROM
FACEBOOK
REFERRALS
TRAFFIC FROM
YOUTUBE
REFERRALS
TRAFFIC FROM
INSTAGRAM
REFERRALS
TRAFFIC FROM
TWITTER
REFERRALS
TRAFFIC FROM
LINKEDIN
REFERRALS
TRAFFIC FROM
PINTEREST
REFERRALS
TRAFFIC FROM
REDDIT
REFERRALS
TRAFFIC
FROM VK
REFERRALS
SOURCE: SEMRUSH. FIGURES REPRESENT TRAFFIC VALUES FOR NOVEMBER 2021. NOTE: TRAFFIC FROM SOCIAL MEDIA REFERRALS REPRESENT THE SHARE OF TOTAL WEBSITE VISITS THAT ORIGINATED FROM A
CLICK OR A TAP ON A LINK PUBLISHED ON THE RESPECTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM. ADVISORY: SOME WEBSITES FEATURED IN THIS RANKING MAY CONTAIN ADULT CONTENT. PLEASE USE CAUTION WHEN
VISITING UNKNOWN DOMAINS. COMPARABILITY: SOURCE METHODOLOGY CHANGES. VALUES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS.
DENMARK
SHARE OF WEBSITE TRAFFIC BY DEVICE, AND SHARE OF WEBSITE TRAFFIC REFERRED BY A SELECTION OF SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS IN NOVEMBER 2021
TOP WEBSITE TRAFFIC DETAIL (SEMRUSH)
FEB
2022

35
11 WIKIPEDIA.ORG 138M [N/A] [N/A] 4M 48S 3.66
12 REDDIT.COM 134M [N/A] [N/A] 12M 09S 7.70
13 INSTAGRAM.COM 122M [N/A] [N/A] 9M 12S 16.39
14 TWITTER.COM 118M [N/A] [N/A] 12M 44S 14.36
15 BT.DK 113M [N/A] [N/A] 6M 36S 7.73
16 LECTIO.DK 95.0M [N/A] [N/A] 9M 46S 7.46
17 UNILOGIN.DK 91.0M [N/A] [N/A] 1M 46S 5.72
18 DBA.DK 87.5M [N/A] [N/A] 9M 01S 11.71
19 LINKEDIN.COM 81.5M [N/A] [N/A] 8M 22S 6.25
20 MESSENGER.COM 65.3M [N/A] [N/A] 9M 48S 4.61
01 GOOGLE.COM 2.09B [N/A] [N/A] 16M 09S 10.58
02 YOUTUBE.COM 1.76B [N/A] [N/A] 25M 38S 14.77
03 FACEBOOK.COM 856M [N/A] [N/A] 12M 34S 9.06
04 NETFLIX.COM 286M [N/A] [N/A] 10M 42S 4.07
05 DR.DK 265M [N/A] [N/A] 6M 39S 3.71
06 GOOGLE.DK 229M [N/A] [N/A] 8M 09S 13.23
07 TV2.DK 206M [N/A] [N/A] 6M 40S 3.72
08 EKSTRABLADET.DK 183M [N/A] [N/A] 7M 07S 5.76
09 TWITCH.TV 171M [N/A] [N/A] 9M 20S 4.47
10 LIVE.COM 142M [N/A] [N/A] 7M 06S 7.85
# WEBSITE
TOTAL
VISITS
MOBILE
SHARE
DESKTOP
SHARE
TIME
PER VISIT
PAGES
PER VISIT
# WEBSITE
TOTAL
VISITS
MOBILE
SHARE
DESKTOP
SHARE
TIME
PER VISIT
PAGES
PER VISIT
SOURCE: SIMILARWEB. FIGURES REPRESENT TRAFFIC VALUES BETWEEN JANUARY AND DECEMBER 2021. ADVISORY: SOME WEBSITES FEATURED IN THIS RANKING MAY CONTAIN ADULT CONTENT. PLEASE USE
CAUTION WHEN VISITING UNKNOWN DOMAINS.
DENMARK
MOST-VISITED WEBSITES: SIMILARWEB RANKING
RANKING OF THE MOST-VISITED WEBSITES ACCORDING TO SIMILARWEB, BASED ON ANNUAL WEBSITE TRAFFIC FOR FULL-YEAR 2021
FEB
2022

36
0.06% 0.65% 0.13% 0.10%
+20.0% (+1 BP) +30.0% (+15 BPS) [UNCHANGED] +25.0% (+2 BPS)
94.37% 3.45% 0.01% 1.23%
-1.5% (-141 BPS) +25.0% (+69 BPS) [UNCHANGED] +78.3% (+54 BPS)
YANDEX DUCKDUCKGO ECOSIA OTHER
GOOGLE BING BAIDU YAHOO!
SOURCE: STATCOUNTER. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF PAGE VIEW REFERRALS ORIGINATING FROM EACH SERVICE AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL PAGE VIEW REFERRALS ORIGINATING FROM
SEARCH ENGINES IN NOVEMBER 2021. PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES REPRESENT RELATIVE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE (I.E. AN INCREASE OF 20% FROM A STARTING VALUE OF 50% WOULD EQUAL 60%, NOT
70%). “BPS” VALUES REPRESENT BASIS POINTS, AND INDICATE THE ABSOLUTE CHANGE. FIGURES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO ROUNDING.
DENMARK
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL WEB TRAFFIC REFERRED BY SEARCH ENGINES THAT ORIGINATED FROM EACH SEARCH SERVICE
SEARCH ENGINE MARKET SHARE
FEB
2022

37
01 GOOGLE 100
02 BT 96
03 TV2 77
04 NYHEDER 74
05 FACEBOOK 72
06 YOUTUBE 66
07 TRANSLATE 55
08 VEJRET 45
09 DR 44
10 EKSTRABLADET 44
11 OVERSÆT 43
12 EB 37
13 IKEA 30
14 EKSTRA BLADET 29
15 YOU 28
16 BT NYHEDER 25
17 GOOGLE TRANSLATE 24
18 CORONATEST 23
19 BILKA 22
20 HARALD NYBORG 20
# SEARCH QUERY INDEX # SEARCH QUERY INDEX
SOURCE: GOOGLE TRENDS, BASED ON SEARCHES CONDUCTED BETWEEN 01 JANUARY 2021 AND 31 DECEMBER 2021. NOTES: ANY SPELLING ERRORS OR LANGUAGE INCONSISTENCIES IN SEARCH QUERIES
ARE AS PUBLISHED BY GOOGLE TRENDS, AND ARE SHOWN “AS IS”, TO ENABLE READERS TO IDENTIFY POTENTIAL CHANGES IN HOW PEOPLE ENTER WRITTEN LANGUAGE IN DIGITAL ENVIRONMENTS. GOOGLE
DOES NOT PUBLISH ABSOLUTE SEARCH VOLUMES, BUT THE “INDEX vs. TOP QUERY” COLUMN SHOWS RELATIVE SEARCH VOLUMES FOR EACH QUERY COMPARED WITH THE SEARCH VOLUME OF THE TOP QUERY.
ADVISORY: GOOGLE TRENDS USES DYNAMIC SAMPLING, SO RANK ORDER AND INDEX VALUES MAY VARY DEPENDING ON WHEN THE TOOL IS ACCESSED, EVEN FOR THE SAME TIME PERIOD.
DENMARK
QUERIES WITH THE GREATEST VOLUME OF GOOGLE SEARCH ACTIVITY BETWEEN 01 JANUARY 2021 AND 31 DECEMBER 2021
TOP GOOGLE SEARCHES
FEB
2022

38
11.5% 29.3% 14.3% 24.9%
USE VOICE ASSISTANTS (E.G. SIRI,
GOOGLE ASSISTANT) TO FIND
INFORMATION EACH WEEK
VISIT SOCIAL NETWORKS
TO LOOK FOR INFORMATION
ABOUT BRANDS AND PRODUCTS
USE IMAGE RECOGNITION TOOLS
(E.G. GOOGLE LENS, PINTEREST
LENS) ON MOBILE EACH MONTH
USE ONLINE TOOLS TO
TRANSLATE TEXT INTO DIFFERENT
LANGUAGES EACH WEEK
DENMARK
PERCENTAGE OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64 WHO ENGAGE IN EACH KIND OF ONLINE ACTIVITY
ACCESSING ONLINE INFORMATION
FEB
2022

39
15.2% 13.1% 15.4% 15.9% 13.1%
80.3% 32.4% 25.1% 19.5% 14.1%
EDUCATIONAL
VIDEO
PRODUCT
REVIEW VIDEO
SPORTS CLIP OR
HIGHLIGHTS VIDEO
GAMING
VIDEO
INFLUENCER
VIDEOS AND VLOGS
ANY KIND
OF VIDEO
MUSIC
VIDEO
COMEDY, MEME,
OR VIRAL VIDEO
TUTORIAL OR
HOW-TO VIDEO
VIDEO
LIVESTREAM
DENMARK
PERCENTAGE OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64 WHO WATCH EACH KIND OF VIDEO CONTENT VIA THE INTERNET EACH WEEK
WATCHING ONLINE VIDEO CONTENT
FEB
2022

40
93.1% 95.0% 1H 23M 43.0%
PERCENTAGE OF INTERNET USERS
AGED 16 TO 64 WHO STREAM TV
CONTENT OVER THE INTERNET
INTERNET USERS WHO STREAM
TV CONTENT vs. INTERNET USERS
WHO WATCH ANY KIND OF TV
AVERAGE DAILY TIME INTERNET
USERS AGED 16 TO 64 SPEND
WATCHING STREAMING TV
TIME SPENT WATCHING STREAMING
TV AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL
TIME SPENT WATCHING TV
DENMARK
PERCENTAGE OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64 WHO WATCH TV CONTENT VIA STREAMING SERVICES (E.G. NETFLIX) EACH MONTH
STREAMING TV CONTENT VIA THE INTERNET
FEB
2022

41
40.1% 21.1% 20.6% 15.7%
LISTEN TO MUSIC
STREAMING SERVICES
LISTEN TO ONLINE RADIO
SHOWS OR STATIONS
LISTEN TO
PODCASTS
LISTEN TO
AUDIO BOOKS
DENMARK
PERCENTAGE OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64 WHO LISTEN TO EACH KIND OF AUDIO CONTENT VIA THE INTERNET EACH WEEK
LISTENING TO ONLINE AUDIO CONTENT
FEB
2022

42
21.9% 5.6% 3.4% 3.1%
74.6% 50.9% 33.1% 22.2%
TABLET HAND-HELD GAMING DEVICE MEDIA STREAMING DEVICE VIRTUAL REALITY HEADSET
ANY DEVICE SMARTPHONE LAPTOP OR DESKTOP GAMES CONSOLE
DENMARK
PERCENTAGE OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64 WHO PLAY VIDEO GAMES ON EACH KIND OF DEVICE
DEVICES USED TO PLAY VIDEO GAMES
FEB
2022

43
$102.8 $84.21 $75.63 $76.02
+29.1% (+$23 MILLION) +26.6% (+$18 MILLION) +32.5% (+$19 MILLION) +32.4% (+$19 MILLION)
885.6 $731.2 $209.9 $182.6
THOUSAND MILLION MILLION MILLION
+14.0% (+109 THOUSAND) +33.3% (+$183 MILLION) +33.5% (+$53 MILLION) +40.0% (+$52 MILLION)
VALUE OF SMART HOME
SECURITY DEVICE MARKET
VALUE OF SMART HOME
ENTERTAINMENT DEVICE MARKET
VALUE OF SMART HOME
COMFORT & LIGHTING MARKET
VALUE OF SMART HOME
ENERGY MANAGEMENT MARKET
NUMBER OF HOMES WITH
SMART HOME DEVICES
TOTAL ANNUAL VALUE OF THE
SMART HOME DEVICES MARKET
VALUE OF SMART HOME
APPLIANCES MARKET
VALUE OF SMART HOME CONTROL
& CONNECTIVITY DEVICE MARKET
SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: “SMART HOME DEVICES” INCLUDE: DIGITALLY CONNECTED AND CONTROLLED HOME DEVICES THAT CAN BE
REMOTELY CONTROLLED; SENSORS, ACTUATORS AND CLOUD SERVICES THAT ENABLE HOME AUTOMATION; CONTROL HUBS THAT CONNECT SENSORS AND ACTUATORS TO REMOTE CONTROLS AND TO EACH
OTHER; AND SMART HOME-RELATED SOFTWARE SALES (INCLUDING SUBSCRIPTION FEES). DOES NOT INCLUDE SMART TVS, OR B2B OR C2C SALES. FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES OF FULL-YEAR REVENUES FOR
2021 IN U.S. DOLLARS, AND COMPARISONS WITH EQUIVALENT VALUES FOR THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. COMPARABILITY: BASE CHANGES.
DENMARK
VALUE OF THE MARKET FOR SMART HOME DEVICES (U.S. DOLLARS)
SMART HOME MARKET OVERVIEW
FEB
2022

44
$432 $188 $220 $353
+5.6% (+$22.82) +6.0% (+$10.59) +8.0% (+$16.27) +5.4% (+$18.10)
32.5% $826 $1,145 $660
+13.6% (+114 BPS) +17.0% (+$120) +14.5% (+$145) +11.6% (+$68.57)
ARPU: SMART HOME
SECURITY DEVICES
ARPU: SMART HOME
ENTERTAINMENT DEVICES
ARPU: SMART HOME
COMFORT & LIGHTING
ARPU: SMART HOME
ENERGY MANAGEMENT
PENETRATION OF
SMART HOME DEVICES
ARPU: SPEND ON ALL
SMART HOME DEVICES
ARPU: SMART
HOME APPLIANCES
ARPU: SMART HOME CONTROL
& CONNECTIVITY DEVICES
SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: “SMART HOME DEVICES” INCLUDE: DIGITALLY CONNECTED AND CONTROLLED HOME DEVICES THAT CAN BE
REMOTELY CONTROLLED; SENSORS, ACTUATORS AND CLOUD SERVICES THAT ENABLE HOME AUTOMATION; CONTROL HUBS THAT CONNECT SENSORS AND ACTUATORS TO REMOTE CONTROLS AND TO EACH
OTHER; AND SMART HOME-RELATED SOFTWARE SALES (INCLUDING SUBSCRIPTION FEES). DOES NOT INCLUDE SMART TVS, OR B2B OR C2C SALES. FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES OF FULL-YEAR SPEND PER
SMART HOME FOR 2021 IN U.S. DOLLARS, AND COMPARISONS WITH EQUIVALENT VALUES FOR THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. COMPARABILITY: BASE CHANGES.
DENMARK
AVERAGE ANNUAL SPEND ON SMART HOME DEVICES PER SMART HOME (U.S. DOLLARS)
AVERAGE ANNUAL REVENUE PER SMART HOME
FEB
2022

45
37.8% 30.8% 8.3%
USE A BANKING, INVESTMENT,
OR INSURANCE WEBSITE OR
MOBILE APP EACH MONTH
USE A MOBILE PAYMENT
SERVICE (E.G. APPLE PAY,
SAMSUNG PAY) EACH MONTH
OWN ANY FORM
OF CRYPTOCURRENCY
(E.G. BITCOIN, ETHER)
DENMARK
PERCENTAGE OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64 WHO OWN OR USE EACH KIND OF DIGITAL FINANCIAL SERVICE
USE OF ONLINE FINANCIAL SERVICES
FEB
2022

46
40.0% 35.3% 49.0% 30.3% 22.8%
EXPRESS CONCERN
ABOUT WHAT IS REAL
vs. WHAT IS FAKE
ON THE INTERNET
WORRY ABOUT
HOW COMPANIES
MIGHT USE THEIR
ONLINE DATA
DECLINE COOKIES
ON WEBSITES
AT LEAST SOME
OF THE TIME
USE A TOOL TO BLOCK
ADVERTISEMENTS ON
THE INTERNET AT LEAST
SOME OF THE TIME
USE A VIRTUAL PRIVATE
NETWORK (VPN) TO
ACCESS THE INTERNET AT
LEAST SOME OF THE TIME
SOURCES: DATA FOR “CONCERNS ABOUT WHAT IS REAL vs WHAT IS FAKE ON THE INTERNET” VIA REUTERS INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY OF JOURNALISM’S “DIGITAL NEWS REPORT 2021”. FIGURES REPRESENT THE
FINDINGS OF A GLOBAL STUDY OF ONLINE NEWS CONSUMERS AGED 18+ IN 46 COUNTRIES AROUND THE WORLD (SEE DIGITALNEWSREPORT.ORG FOR MORE DETAILS). DATA FOR ALL OTHER DATA POINTS VIA
GWI (Q3 2021). FIGURES REPRESENT THE FINDINGS OF A BROAD GLOBAL SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64. SEE GWI.COM FOR FULL DETAILS.
DENMARK
PERSPECTIVES AND ACTIVITIES OF ONLINE ADULTS RELATING TO THEIR ONLINE DATA PRIVACY AND SECURITY
ONLINE PRIVACY AND SECURITY
FEB
2022

48
85.3% 99.0% 86.2% 53.6% 46.4%
4.97 +2.5% 1H 59M +17.8% 5.8
MILLION +120 THOUSAND +18 MINS
SOCIAL MEDIA USERS
vs. TOTAL POPULATION
SOCIAL MEDIA USERS
vs. POPULATION AGE 13+
SOCIAL MEDIA USERS
vs. TOTAL INTERNET USERS
FEMALE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS
vs. TOTAL SOCIAL MEDIA USERS
MALE SOCIAL MEDIA USERS
vs. TOTAL SOCIAL MEDIA USERS
NUMBER OF SOCIAL
MEDIA USERS
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN SOCIAL MEDIA USERS
AVERAGE DAILY TIME SPENT
USING SOCIAL MEDIA
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN TIME
SPENT USING SOCIAL MEDIA
AVERAGE NUMBER OF SOCIAL
PLATFORMS USED EACH MONTH
SOURCES: KEPIOS ANALYSIS; COMPANY ADVERTISING RESOURCES AND ANNOUNCEMENTS; CNNIC; TECHRASA; OCDH; U.N.; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU. DATA FOR TIME SPENT AND AVERAGE NUMBER OF
PLATFORMS: GWI (Q3 2021). SEE GWI.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTE: FIGURE FOR “AVERAGE NUMBER OF SOCIAL PLATFORMS USED EACH MONTH” INCLUDES DATA FOR YOUTUBE. ADVISORY: SOCIAL
MEDIA USERS MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA
REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. SEE NOTES ON DATA FOR FURTHER DETAILS.
DENMARK
HEADLINES FOR SOCIAL MEDIA ADOPTION AND USE (NOTE: USERS MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS)
OVERVIEW OF SOCIAL MEDIA USE
FEB
2022

49
CHANGE
IN
DATA
SOURCE
3.20 M
3.40 M 3.50 M
3.80 M
4.10 M 4.10 M 4.10 M
4.85 M 4.97 M
+6.3% +2.9% +8.6% +7.9% 0% 0% [N/A] +2.5%
JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN JAN
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
SOURCES: KEPIOS ANALYSIS; COMPANY ADVERTISING RESOURCES AND EARNINGS ANNOUNCEMENTS. NOTE: WHERE LETTERS ARE SHOWN NEXT TO FIGURES ABOVE BARS, “K” DENOTES THOUSANDS (E.G.
“123 K” = 123,000), “M” DENOTES MILLIONS (E.G. “1.23 M” = 1,230,000), AND “B” DENOTES BILLIONS (E.G. “1.23 B” = 1,230,000,000). WHERE NO LETTER IS PRESENT, VALUES ARE SHOWN AS IS. ADVISORY:
SOCIAL MEDIA USERS MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS. COMPARABILITY: CHANGES TO DATA SOURCES AND SIGNIFICANT BASE REVISIONS IN SOURCE DATA MAY MEAN THAT FIGURES ARE NOT
COMPARABLE BETWEEN CERTAIN YEARS.
DENMARK
NUMBER OF SOCIAL MEDIA USERS AND YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
SOCIAL MEDIA USERS OVER TIME
FEB
2022
DATAREPORTAL

50
3.7%
2.8%
8.9% 8.6%
10.8%
10.4%
8.1%
7.4%
8.3%
7.2%
6.8%
5.4%
6.5%
5.2%
13 – 17
YEARS OLD
18 – 24
YEARS OLD
25 – 34
YEARS OLD
35 – 44
YEARS OLD
45 – 54
YEARS OLD
55 – 64
YEARS OLD
65+
YEARS OLD
FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE
SOURCES: KEPIOS ANALYSIS; META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES. NOTE: META ONLY PERMITS PEOPLE AGED 13 AND ABOVE TO USE ITS PLATFORMS, SO WHILE THERE MAY BE USERS BELOW THE AGE OF 13, THEY
DO NOT FEATURE IN THE AVAILABLE DATA. META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES ONLY PUBLISH GENDER DATA FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE”. COMPARABILITY: IMPORTANT BASE DATA REVISIONS AND SOURCE
REPORTING CHANGES. VALUES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH VALUES PUBLISHED IN OUR PREVIOUS REPORTS.
DENMARK
SHARE OF COMBINED, DEDUPLICATED POTENTIAL ADVERTISING REACH ACROSS FACEBOOK, INSTAGRAM, AND MESSENGER, BY AGE AND GENDER
DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE OF META’S AD AUDIENCE
FEB
2022
DATAREPORTAL

51
53.7%
36.7%
28.0%
26.1%
18.8%
18.3%
18.0%
17.0%
16.4%
15.3%
15.0%
14.5%
13.9%
12.8%
12.2%
KEEPING IN TOUCH WITH FRIENDS AND FAMILY
FILLING SPARE TIME
READING NEWS STORIES
LOOKING FOR THINGS TO DO OR BUY
FINDING LIKE-MINDED PEOPLE
FINDING PRODUCTS TO PURCHASE
FINDING CONTENT
SEEING WHAT’S BEING TALKED ABOUT
FOLLOWING SPORTS
MAKING NEW CONTACTS
AVOIDING MISSING OUT (FOMO)
POSTING ABOUT YOUR LIFE
ACTIVITIES FOR WORK
FINDING CONTENT FROM BRANDS
CELEBRITIES AND INFLUENCERS
DENMARK
PRIMARY REASONS WHY INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64 USE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS
MAIN REASONS FOR USING SOCIAL MEDIA
FEB
2022

52
78.8%
72.0%
59.4%
44.9%
32.9%
32.7%
31.4%
26.6%
25.1%
22.7%
18.8%
17.0%
15.5%
7.0%
6.7%
FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK MESSENGER
INSTAGRAM
SNAPCHAT
IMESSAGE
LINKEDIN
PINTEREST
TIKTOK
TWITTER
WHATSAPP
SKYPE
DISCORD
REDDIT
VIBER
TELEGRAM
SOURCE: GWI (Q3 2021). FIGURES REPRESENT THE FINDINGS OF A BROAD GLOBAL SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64. SEE GWI.COM FOR FULL DETAILS. NOTE: YOUTUBE IS NOT OFFERED AS AN
ANSWER OPTION FOR THIS QUESTION IN GWI’S SURVEY. COMPARABILITY: A VERSION OF THIS CHART THAT APPEARED IN OUR PREVIOUS REPORTS WAS BASED ON A PREVIOUS QUESTION IN GWI’S SURVEY
THAT INCLUDED YOUTUBE AS AN ANSWER OPTION. GWI’S CURRENT SURVEY FEATURES A REVISED VERSION OF THIS QUESTION THAT DOES NOT INCLUDE YOUTUBE AS AN ANSWER OPTION, WHILE OTHER
CHANGES TO THE QUESTION’S WORDING MAY MEAN THAT THE VALUES AND RANK ORDER SHOWN HERE ARE NOT DIRECTLY COMPARABLE WITH THOSE SHOWN ON A SIMILAR CHART IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
DENMARK
PERCENTAGE OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64 WHO USE EACH PLATFORM EACH MONTH
MOST-USED SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS
FEB
2022

53
26.1%
16.0%
13.3%
6.5%
4.2%
3.3%
3.0%
2.9%
2.8%
2.6%
FACEBOOK
TWITTER
INSTAGRAM
FACEBOOK MESSENGER
SNAPCHAT
TIKTOK
DISCORD
LINKEDIN
WHATSAPP
PINTEREST
SOURCE: GWI (Q3 2021). FIGURES REPRESENT THE FINDINGS OF A BROAD GLOBAL SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64. SEE GWI.COM FOR FULL DETAILS. NOTE: YOUTUBE IS NOT OFFERED AS AN
ANSWER OPTION FOR THIS QUESTION IN GWI’S SURVEY.
DENMARK
PERCENTAGE OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64 WHO SAY THAT EACH OPTION IS THEIR “FAVOURITE” SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM
FAVOURITE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS
FEB
2022

54
6.9% 4.1% 5.5% 6.4%
56.8% 29.3% 17.8% 11.8%
ANY KIND OF SOCIAL
MEDIA PLATFORM
SOCIAL
NETWORKS
QUESTION & ANSWER
SITES (E.G. QUORA)
FORUMS AND
MESSAGE BOARDS
MESSAGING AND
LIVE CHAT SERVICES
MICRO-BLOGS
(E.G. TWITTER)
VLOGS (BLOGS IN
A VIDEO FORMAT)
ONLINE PINBOARDS
(E.G. PINTEREST)
SOURCE: GWI (Q3 2021). FIGURES REPRESENT THE FINDINGS OF A BROAD GLOBAL SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64. SEE GWI.COM FOR FULL DETAILS. NOTE: VALUES FOR “ANY KIND OF SOCIAL
MEDIA PLATFORM” INCLUDE AT LEAST ONE OF: SOCIAL NETWORKS, QUESTION AND ANSWER SITES (E.G. QUORA), FORUMS AND MESSAGE BOARDS, MESSAGING AND LIVE CHAT SERVICES, MICRO-BLOGS
(E.G. TWITTER), BLOGS ON PRODUCTS / BRANDS (NOT SHOWN AS AN INDIVIDUAL VALUE ON THIS CHART), VLOGS (I.E. BLOGS RECORDED IN A VIDEO FORMAT), AND ONLINE PINBOARDS (E.G. PINTEREST).
DENMARK
PERCENTAGE OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64 WHO USE EACH SOCIAL MEDIA CHANNEL TO FIND INFORMATION ABOUT BRANDS AND PRODUCTS
USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA FOR BRAND RESEARCH
FEB
2022

55
50.5%
25.7%
24.4%
23.1%
20.6%
19.9%
19.0%
18.7%
18.3%
17.7%
17.6%
17.2%
16.6%
15.7%
15.7%
FRIENDS, FAMILY, AND PEOPLE YOU KNOW
BANDS, SINGERS, AND MUSICIANS
ACTORS, COMEDIANS, AND PERFORMERS
EVENTS YOU’RE ATTENDING
BRANDS YOU BUY FROM
TV SHOWS OR CHANNELS
RESTAURANTS, CHEFS, AND FOODIES
ENTERTAINMENT & MEMES
INFLUENCERS AND EXPERTS
SPORTS PEOPLE AND TEAMS
JOURNALISTS OR NEWS COMPANIES
BRANDS YOU’RE RESEARCHING
WORK-RELATED COMPANIES
WORK-RELATED CONTACTS
WILDLIFE ORGANISATIONS OR ANIMALS
DENMARK
PERCENTAGE OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64 WHO FOLLOW EACH TYPE OF ACCOUNT ON SOCIAL MEDIA
TYPES OF SOCIAL MEDIA ACCOUNTS FOLLOWED
FEB
2022

56
3.28% 1.16% 1.03% 0.05% 0.27%
+158% (+201 BPS) +31.8% (+28 BPS) +106% (+53 BPS) [UNCHANGED] +108% (+14 BPS)
50.19% 22.23% 13.88% 4.73% 3.17%
-17.5% (-1,062 BPS) +184% (+1,440 BPS) -41.7% (-994 BPS) +139% (+275 BPS) +17.0% (+46 BPS)
REDDIT TUMBLR LINKEDIN VKONTAKTE OTHER
FACEBOOK TWITTER PINTEREST INSTAGRAM YOUTUBE
SOURCE: STATCOUNTER. NOTES: SHARE DOES NOT INCLUDE TRAFFIC FROM MESSENGER PLATFORMS. DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR A SELECTION OF PLATFORMS, AND PERCENTAGES REFLECT SHARE OF
AVAILABLE PLATFORMS ONLY. FIGURES REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF WEB PAGE REFERRALS ORIGINATING FROM EACH SERVICE AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL WEB PAGE REFERRALS ORIGINATING FROM THE
AVAILABLE SELECTION OF SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS ON ANY DEVICE IN NOVEMBER 2021. PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES REPRESENT RELATIVE YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE (I.E. AN INCREASE OF 20% FROM A
STARTING VALUE OF 50% WOULD EQUAL 60%, NOT 70%). “BPS” VALUES REPRESENT BASIS POINTS, AND INDICATE THE ABSOLUTE CHANGE. FIGURES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO ROUNDING.
DENMARK
SHARE OF WEB TRAFFIC ARRIVING ON THIRD-PARTY WEBSITES VIA CLICKS OR TAPS ON LINKS PUBLISHED IN SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS (ANY DEVICE)
WEB TRAFFIC REFERRALS FROM SOCIAL MEDIA
FEB
2022

!
In Q4 2021, Meta made some important changes to how its self-service tools report the
potential advertising reach of its platforms, including a move to publishing audience figures as
a range instead of as an absolute number. Our analysis suggests that Meta also revised its base
data, resulting in some important corrections to published audience figures for Facebook and
Messenger. As a result, we are currently unable to provide any figures for changes over time in
these platforms’ audiences, and we advise readers not to compare the advertising audience
figures for Facebook and Messenger contained within this report with figures published for
those platforms in previous reports. For more information, please read our complete notes on
data variance, potential mismatches, and curiosities: https://datareportal.com/notes-on-data.
CHANGES IN META’S DATA REPORTING

59
3.60 61.8% 71.7% 52.1% 47.9%
MILLION
POTENTIAL AUDIENCE
THAT META REPORTS
CAN BE REACHED WITH
ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK’S POTENTIAL
ADVERTISING REACH
AS A PERCENTAGE OF
TOTAL POPULATION
FACEBOOK’S POTENTIAL
ADVERTISING REACH
AS A PERCENTAGE OF
POPULATION AGED 13+
PERCENTAGE OF
ITS AD AUDIENCE
THAT FACEBOOK
REPORTS IS FEMALE
PERCENTAGE OF
ITS AD AUDIENCE
THAT FACEBOOK
REPORTS IS MALE
SOURCE: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL ACTIVE USER BASE.
NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES ONLY PUBLISH GENDER DATA FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE”. COMPARABILITY: META HAS SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS
BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
DENMARK
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK: ADVERTISING AUDIENCE OVERVIEW
FEB
2022

60
97.0% 3.0% 51.8% 45.2%
USE ANY KIND OF
MOBILE PHONE
ONLY USE LAPTOP OR
DESKTOP COMPUTER
USE BOTH COMPUTERS
AND MOBILE PHONES
ONLY USE MOBILE
PHONES (ANY TYPE)
SOURCE: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES, BASED ON DATA PUBLISHED IN JUNE 2021. NOTE: FIGURES REPRESENT VALUES FOR ACTIVE FACEBOOK USERS AGED 18 AND ABOVE.
DENMARK
PERCENTAGE OF FACEBOOK’S ADVERTISING AUDIENCE THAT USES EACH DEVICE TO ACCESS THE PLATFORM, EITHER VIA AN APP OR A WEB BROWSER
DEVICES USED TO ACCESS FACEBOOK
FEB
2022

61
1 1 17 10 11 5 1 1 29 19
1 13 7 1 24
FACEBOOK PAGES
“LIKED” (LIFETIME)
POSTS “LIKED” IN THE
PREVIOUS 30 DAYS
COMMENTS MADE IN
THE PREVIOUS 30 DAYS
POSTS SHARED IN THE
PREVIOUS 30 DAYS
ADS CLICKED OR TAPPED
IN THE PREVIOUS 30 DAYS
FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE
SOURCE: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES, BASED ON DATA PUBLISHED IN JUNE 2021. NOTE: FIGURES REPRESENT MEDIAN VALUES FOR ACTIVE FACEBOOK USERS AGED 18 AND ABOVE. “ADS” MAY INCLUDE
ANY KIND OF PAID CONTENT PUBLISHED TO FACEBOOK, INCLUDING SPONSORED POSTS.
DENMARK
THE NUMBER OF TIMES A “TYPICAL” USER AGED 18+ PERFORMS EACH ACTIVITY ON FACEBOOK
FACEBOOK ACTIVITY FREQUENCY
FEB
2022

62
0.17% 0.34% 0.21% 0.10% 1.01%
AVERAGE FACEBOOK POST
ENGAGEMENTS vs. PAGE
FANS: ALL POST TYPES
FANS: PHOTO POSTS
FANS: VIDEO POSTS
FANS: LINK POSTS
FANS: STATUS POSTS
SOURCE: LOCOWISE. FIGURES REPRESENT AVERAGES BETWEEN 01 SEPTEMBER 2021 AND 30 NOVEMBER 2021. NOTES: PERCENTAGES COMPARE THE COMBINED TOTAL OF REACTIONS, COMMENTS, AND
SHARES WITH THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGE FANS. FIGURES ARE AVERAGES BASED ON A WIDE VARIETY OF DIFFERENT KINDS OF PAGE, WITH DIFFERENT AUDIENCE SIZES, IN VARIOUS COUNTRIES AROUND THE
WORLD. VALUES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO ROUNDING.
DENMARK
FACEBOOK PAGE POST ENGAGEMENTS (REACTIONS, COMMENTS, AND SHARES) AS A PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL PAGE FANS
FACEBOOK POST ENGAGEMENT BENCHMARKS
FEB
2022

63
4.30 92.0% 50.5% 49.5%
MILLION
4.97 85.3% 86.2% +2.5%
POTENTIAL REACH OF
ADS ON YOUTUBE
YOUTUBE AD REACH
YOUTUBE AD REACH vs.
TOTAL INTERNET USERS
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN YOUTUBE AD REACH
YOUTUBE’S ADVERTISING
REACH: USERS AGED 18+
YOUTUBE’S AD REACH AGE 18+
vs. TOTAL POPULATION AGE 18+
FEMALE YOUTUBE AD REACH AGE 18+
vs. TOTAL YOUTUBE AD REACH AGE 18+
MALE YOUTUBE AD REACH AGE 18+
vs. TOTAL YOUTUBE AD REACH AGE 18+
SOURCES: GOOGLE’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. NOTES: DATA ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR ALL LOCATIONS; FIGURES BASED ON AVAILABLE LOCATIONS ONLY. GOOGLE’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES ONLY PUBLISH GENDER AND AGE DATA FOR
USERS AGED 18 AND ABOVE, AND ONLY PUBLISH GENDER DATA FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE”. FIGURE FOR POTENTIAL REACH AGE 18+ USES A DIFFERENT AUDIENCE TOTAL TO THE ONE USED FOR REACH OF
TOTAL POPULATION.
DENMARK
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON YOUTUBE
YOUTUBE: ADVERTISING AUDIENCE OVERVIEW
FEB
2022

64
01 MUSIC 100
02 MUSIK 80
03 SONGS 72
04 MINECRAFT 60
05 TIKTOK 59
06 FORTNITE 55
07 ROBLOX 53
08 BØRN 51
09 MORTEN 36
10 GTA 32
11 MGP 31
12 ASMR 29
13 JUST DANCE 28
14 SANNEVILLEFAMILY 27
15 MORTEN MÜNSTER 23
16 GTA 5 21
17 POPSI OG KRELLE 20
18 POKEMON 20
19 BEDUNA 19
20 TIKTOK MASHUP 19
SOURCE: GOOGLE TRENDS, BASED ON SEARCHES CONDUCTED ON YOUTUBE BETWEEN 01 JANUARY 2021 AND 31 DECEMBER 2021. NOTE: ANY SPELLING ERRORS OR LANGUAGE INCONSISTENCIES
IN SEARCH QUERIES ARE AS PUBLISHED BY GOOGLE TRENDS, AND ARE SHOWN “AS IS”, TO ENABLE READERS TO IDENTIFY POTENTIAL CHANGES IN HOW PEOPLE ENTER WRITTEN LANGUAGE IN DIGITAL
ENVIRONMENTS. GOOGLE DOES NOT PUBLISH ABSOLUTE SEARCH VOLUMES, BUT THE “INDEX” COLUMN SHOWS RELATIVE SEARCH VOLUMES FOR EACH QUERY COMPARED WITH THE SEARCH VOLUME OF THE
TOP QUERY. ADVISORY: GOOGLE TRENDS USES DYNAMIC SAMPLING, SO RANK ORDER AND INDEX VALUES MAY VARY DEPENDING ON WHEN THE TOOL IS ACCESSED, EVEN FOR THE SAME TIME PERIOD.
DENMARK
QUERIES WITH THE GREATEST VOLUME OF YOUTUBE SEARCH ACTIVITY BETWEEN 01 JANUARY 2021 AND 31 DECEMBER 2021
TOP YOUTUBE SEARCHES
FEB
2022

65
46.8% 53.8% 57.4% 42.6%
2.70 46.4% +17.4% +8.0%
MILLION +400 THOUSAND +200 THOUSAND
90
INSTAGRAM AD REACH
INSTAGRAM AD REACH
vs. POPULATION AGED 13+
FEMALE INSTAGRAM AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INSTAGRAM AD REACH
MALE INSTAGRAM AD REACH
vs. TOTAL INSTAGRAM AD REACH
TOTAL POTENTIAL REACH
OF ADS ON INSTAGRAM
INSTAGRAM AD REACH
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER CHANGE
IN INSTAGRAM AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN INSTAGRAM AD REACH
SOURCES: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY:
META SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING IN Q4 2021, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE MAY NOT BE COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
DENMARK
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON INSTAGRAM
INSTAGRAM: ADVERTISING AUDIENCE OVERVIEW
FEB
2022

66
19.8% 24.4% 56.6% 43.4%
1.14 19.6% +4.1% [N/A]
MILLION +45 THOUSAND [NEW DATA POINT]
90
TIKTOK AD REACH AGE 18+
vs. POPULATION AGE 18+
FEMALE TIKTOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL TIKTOK AD REACH
MALE TIKTOK AD REACH
vs. TOTAL TIKTOK AD REACH
POTENTIAL REACH OF ADS
ON TIKTOK (AGE 18+ ONLY)
QUARTER-ON-QUARTER
CHANGE IN TIKTOK AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN TIKTOK AD REACH
SOURCES: BYTEDANCE’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE
TOTAL ACTIVE USER BASE. NOTES: DATA ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR ALL LOCATIONS; FIGURES BASED ON AVAILABLE LOCATIONS ONLY. FIGURES USE THE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. BYTEDANCE’S
ADVERTISING RESOURCES ONLY PUBLISH AUDIENCE DATA FOR USERS AGED 18 AND ABOVE, BUT ALLOW MARKETERS TO TARGET ADS TO USERS AGED 13 AND ABOVE. BYTEDANCE’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES
ONLY PUBLISH GENDER DATA FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE”.
DENMARK
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE AGED 18+ THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON TIKTOK
TIKTOK: ADVERTISING AUDIENCE OVERVIEW
FEB
2022

67
3.15 54.1% 62.8% 54.1% 45.9%
MILLION
POTENTIAL AUDIENCE
THAT META REPORTS
CAN BE REACHED WITH
ADS ON MESSENGER
MESSENGER’S POTENTIAL
ADVERTISING REACH
AS A PERCENTAGE OF
TOTAL POPULATION
MESSENGER’S POTENTIAL
ADVERTISING REACH
AS A PERCENTAGE OF
POPULATION AGED 13+
PERCENTAGE OF
ITS AD AUDIENCE
THAT MESSENGER
REPORTS IS FEMALE
PERCENTAGE OF
ITS AD AUDIENCE
THAT MESSENGER
REPORTS IS MALE
SOURCE: META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL ACTIVE USER BASE.
SOME MESSENGER AD FORMATS ARE CURRENTLY UNAVAILABLE IN AUSTRALIA, CANADA, FRANCE, AND THE UNITED STATES, AND THIS MAY HAVE A SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON POTENTIAL ADVERTISING REACH
FIGURES IN THOSE COUNTRIES. NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. META’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES ONLY PUBLISH GENDER DATA FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE”. COMPARABILITY: META
HAS SIGNIFICANTLY REVISED ITS BASE DATA AND APPROACH TO AUDIENCE REPORTING, SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH FIGURES PUBLISHED IN PREVIOUS REPORTS.
DENMARK
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON FACEBOOK MESSENGER
MESSENGER: ADVERTISING AUDIENCE OVERVIEW
FEB
2022

68
50.3% 62.0% 46.2% 53.8%
2.90 49.8% +3.6% +7.4%
MILLION +100 THOUSAND +200 THOUSAND
90
LINKEDIN AD REACH
LINKEDIN AD REACH
FEMALE LINKEDIN AD REACH
vs. TOTAL LINKEDIN AD REACH
MALE LINKEDIN AD REACH
vs. TOTAL LINKEDIN AD REACH
OF ADS ON LINKEDIN
LINKEDIN AD REACH
IN LINKEDIN AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN LINKEDIN AD REACH
SOURCES: MICROSOFT’S LINKEDIN ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES
FOR THE TOTAL ACTIVE USER BASE OR REGISTERED MEMBER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN
DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTE: REACH DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS. COMPARABILITY: THE FIGURES
PUBLISHED IN LINKEDIN’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES REFLECT TOTAL REGISTERED MEMBERS (NOT ACTIVE USERS), SO FIGURES SHOWN HERE ARE NOT DIRECTLY COMPARABLE WITH OTHER PLATFORMS.
DENMARK
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON LINKEDIN
LINKEDIN: ADVERTISING AUDIENCE OVERVIEW
FEB
2022

69
44.2% 50.8% 54.6% 45.4%
2.55 43.8% +4.1% 0%
MILLION +100 THOUSAND [UNCHANGED]
90
SNAPCHAT AD REACH
SNAPCHAT AD REACH
FEMALE SNAPCHAT AD REACH
vs. TOTAL SNAPCHAT AD REACH
MALE SNAPCHAT AD REACH
vs. TOTAL SNAPCHAT AD REACH
OF ADS ON SNAPCHAT
SNAPCHAT AD REACH
IN SNAPCHAT AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN SNAPCHAT AD REACH
SOURCES: SNAP’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: DATA ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR ALL LOCATIONS; FIGURES BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA ONLY, USING MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES.
GENDER DATA ARE ONLY AVAILABLE FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” USERS, BUT GENDER AUDIENCE VALUES MAY NOT SUM TO THE TOTAL AUDIENCE FIGURE, SO GENDER PERCENTAGES MAY NOT SUM TO 100%.
DENMARK
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON SNAPCHAT
SNAPCHAT: ADVERTISING AUDIENCE OVERVIEW
FEB
2022

70
685.1 11.8% 13.7% 11.9% -4.0%
THOUSAND -28 THOUSAND
90
POTENTIAL AUDIENCE
THAT TWITTER REPORTS
CAN BE REACHED WITH
ADS ON TWITTER
TWITTER’S POTENTIAL
ADVERTISING REACH
AS A PERCENTAGE OF
TOTAL POPULATION
ADVERTISING REACH
AS A PERCENTAGE OF
POPULATION AGED 13+
ADVERTISING REACH
AS A PERCENTAGE OF
TOTAL INTERNET USERS
QUARTER-ON-
QUARTER CHANGE IN
ADVERTISING REACH
SOURCES: TWITTER’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE TOTAL
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. FIGURES PUBLISHED IN TWITTER’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES ARE SUBJECT TO SIGNIFICANT FLUCTUATION, EVEN WITHIN SHORT PERIODS OF TIME.
NOTES: FIGURES USE MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES. DUE TO ANOMALIES IN SOURCE DATA, WE ARE CURRENTLY UNABLE TO OFFER DATA FOR TWITTER USE BY GENDER. COMPARABILITY: BASE CHANGES.
DENMARK
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON TWITTER
TWITTER: ADVERTISING AUDIENCE OVERVIEW
FEB
2022

71
19.0% 21.9% 81.4% 14.8%
1.10 18.8% -2.3% -0.6%
MILLION -26 THOUSAND -7,000
90
PINTEREST AD REACH
PINTEREST AD REACH
FEMALE PINTEREST AD REACH
vs. TOTAL PINTEREST AD REACH
MALE PINTEREST AD REACH
vs. TOTAL PINTEREST AD REACH
OF ADS ON PINTEREST
PINTEREST AD REACH
IN PINTEREST AD REACH
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN PINTEREST AD REACH
SOURCES: PINTEREST’S ADVERTISING RESOURCES; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. ADVISORY: AUDIENCE FIGURES MAY NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, AND MAY NOT MATCH EQUIVALENT FIGURES FOR THE
TOTAL ACTIVE USER BASE. FIGURES FOR REACH vs. POPULATION AND REACH vs. INTERNET USERS MAY EXCEED 100% DUE TO DUPLICATE AND FAKE ACCOUNTS, DELAYS IN DATA REPORTING, AND DIFFERENCES
BETWEEN CENSUS COUNTS AND RESIDENT POPULATIONS. NOTES: DATA ARE NOT AVAILABLE FOR ALL LOCATIONS; FIGURES BASED ON AVAILABLE DATA ONLY, USING MIDPOINT OF PUBLISHED RANGES.
PINTEREST’S TOOLS ALSO PUBLISH DATA FOR USER OF “UNSPECIFIED” GENDER, SO VALUES FOR “FEMALE” AND “MALE” REACH SHOWN HERE MAY NOT SUM TO 100%.
DENMARK
THE POTENTIAL AUDIENCE THAT MARKETERS CAN REACH WITH ADS ON PINTEREST
PINTEREST: ADVERTISING AUDIENCE OVERVIEW
FEB
2022

73
8.88 152.4% +0.9% 98.3%
NUMBER OF CELLULAR
MOBILE CONNECTIONS
(EXCLUDING IOT)
NUMBER OF CELLULAR MOBILE
CONNECTIONS COMPARED
WITH TOTAL POPULATION
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN THE NUMBER OF CELLULAR
MOBILE CONNECTIONS
SHARE OF CELLULAR MOBILE
CONNECTIONS THAT ARE
BROADBAND (3G, 4G, 5G)
SOURCE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE. NOTES: TOTAL CELLULAR CONNECTIONS INCLUDE DEVICES OTHER THAN MOBILE PHONES, BUT EXCLUDE CELLULAR IOT CONNECTIONS. FIGURES MAY SIGNIFICANTLY EXCEED
FIGURES FOR POPULATION DUE TO MULTIPLE CONNECTIONS AND CONNECTED DEVICES PER PERSON. COMPARABILITY: BASE CHANGES. VERSIONS OF THIS CHART PUBLISHED IN SOME OF OUR PREVIOUS
REPORTS FEATURED CELLULAR CONNECTION FIGURES THAT INCLUDED CELLULAR IOT CONNECTIONS. FIGURES SHOWN HERE DO NOT INCLUDE CELLULAR IOT CONNECTIONS.
DENMARK
USE OF MOBILE PHONES AND DEVICES THAT CONNECT TO CELLULAR NETWORKS
MOBILE CONNECTIVITY
FEB
2022

74
8.86 M 8.89 M 8.73 M 8.72 M 8.80 M 8.88 M
+0.3% -1.8% -0.1% +0.9% +0.9%
Q4 2016 Q4 2017 Q4 2018 Q4 2019 Q4 2020 Q4 2021
SOURCE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE. NOTE: WHERE LETTERS ARE SHOWN NEXT TO FIGURES ABOVE BARS, “K” DENOTES THOUSANDS (E.G. “123 K” = 123,000), “M” DENOTES MILLIONS (E.G. “1.23 M” = 1,230,000),
AND “B” DENOTES BILLIONS (E.G. “1.23 B” = 1,230,000,000). WHERE NO LETTER IS PRESENT, VALUES ARE SHOWN AS IS. COMPARABILITY: BASE REVISIONS. NUMBERS MAY NOT CORRELATE WITH VALUES
PUBLISHED IN OUR PREVIOUS REPORTS.
DENMARK
NUMBER OF CELLULAR MOBILE CONNECTIONS AND YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
CELLULAR MOBILE CONNECTIONS OVER TIME
FEB
2022

75
$226.75 4.1% $0.79 0.02%
PRICE OF THE
CHEAPEST SMARTPHONE
HANDSET (IN USD)
PRICE OF THE CHEAPEST
SMARTPHONE HANDSET
vs. AVERAGE INCOME
AVERAGE PRICE OF
1GB OF CELLULAR
MOBILE DATA (IN USD)
AVERAGE PRICE OF 1GB
OF CELLULAR MOBILE DATA
vs. AVERAGE INCOME
SOURCES: HANDSET PRICES: ALLIANCE FOR AFFORDABLE INTERNET; ACCESS THE FULL DATASET AT A4AI.ORG. MOBILE DATA PRICES: CABLE.CO.UK; WORLD BANK. COMPARABILITY: VALUE FOR HANDSET PRICES
vs. MONTHLY INCOME AS PUBLISHED BY A4AI, AND MAY USE A DIFFERENT VALUE FOR AVERAGE MONTHLY INCOME COMPARED WITH THE DATA USED TO CALCULATE THE PRICE OF 1GB OF MOBILE DATA vs.
MONTHLY INCOME. AS A RESULT, VALUES MAY NOT CORRELATE ACROSS DATA POINTS.
DENMARK
THE COST OF BUYING A SMARTPHONE HANDSET AND 1GB OF CELLULAR MOBILE DATA, AND COMPARISONS WITH AVERAGE MONTHLY INCOME
AFFORDABILITY OF MOBILE INTERNET ACCESS
FEB
2022

76
31.12% 68.57% 0.29% 0% 0.02%
-17.8% (-675 BPS) +10.7% (+664 BPS) +81.3% (+13 BPS) [UNCHANGED] -50.0% (-2 BPS)
SHARE OF MOBILE WEB
TRAFFIC ORIGINATING
FROM ANDROID DEVICES
SHARE OF MOBILE WEB
TRAFFIC ORIGINATING
FROM APPLE IOS DEVICES
SHARE OF MOBILE WEB
TRAFFIC ORIGINATING FROM
SAMSUNG OS DEVICES
SHARE OF MOBILE WEB
TRAFFIC ORIGINATING
FROM KAI OS DEVICES
SHARE OF MOBILE WEB
TRAFFIC ORIGINATING
FROM OTHER OS DEVICES
SOURCE: STATCOUNTER. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF WEB PAGES SERVED TO BROWSERS ON MOBILE PHONES RUNNING EACH OPERATING SYSTEM COMPARED WITH THE TOTAL NUMBER
OF WEB PAGES SERVED TO MOBILE BROWSERS IN NOVEMBER 2021. FIGURES FOR SAMSUNG OS REFER ONLY TO THOSE DEVICES RUNNING OPERATING SYSTEMS DEVELOPED BY SAMSUNG (E.G. BADA AND
TIZEN), AND DO NOT INCLUDE SAMSUNG DEVICES RUNNING ANDROID. PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES REPRESENT RELATIVE CHANGE (I.E. AN INCREASE OF 20% FROM A STARTING VALUE OF 50% WOULD
EQUAL 60%, NOT 70%). “BPS” VALUES REPRESENT BASIS POINTS, AND INDICATE THE ABSOLUTE CHANGE. FIGURES MAY NOT SUM TO 100% DUE TO ROUNDING.
DENMARK
PERCENTAGE OF WEB PAGE REQUESTS ORIGINATING FROM MOBILE HANDSETS RUNNING EACH MOBILE OPERATING SYSTEM
SHARE OF MOBILE WEB TRAFFIC BY MOBILE OS
FEB
2022

78
100.0% 99.8% 38.2% 51.4% 97.1% 97.7% [N/A] [N/A]
99.2% 99.6% 74.5% 81.5% 80.5% 85.5% 79.1% 84.0%
99.4% 78.0% 83.0% 81.6%
99.9% 44.7% 97.4% [N/A]
FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE
MADE OR RECEIVED DIGITAL
PAYMENTS IN THE PAST YEAR
MADE A PURCHASE ON THE
INTERNET IN THE PAST YEAR
USED ONLINE BANKING
IN THE PAST YEAR
USED THE INTERNET TO
PAY BILLS IN THE PAST YEAR
FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE
ACCOUNT WITH A
FINANCIAL INSTITUTION
CREDIT CARD
OWNERSHIP
DEBIT CARD
OWNERSHIP
MOBILE MONEY ACCOUNT
(E.G. MPESA, GCASH)
SOURCE: WORLD BANK. NOTES: SOME FIGURES HAVE NOT BEEN UPDATED IN THE PAST YEAR, SO MAY BE LESS REPRESENTATIVE OF CURRENT BEHAVIOURS. PERCENTAGES ARE OF ADULTS AGED 15 AND ABOVE,
NOT OF TOTAL POPULATION. MOBILE MONEY ACCOUNTS ONLY REFER TO SERVICES THAT STORE FUNDS IN AN ELECTRONIC WALLET LINKED DIRECTLY TO A PHONE NUMBER, SUCH AS MPESA, GCASH, AND
TIGO PESA. FIGURES FOR MOBILE MONEY ACCOUNTS DO NOT INCLUDE PEOPLE WHO USE ‘OVER-THE-TOP’ MOBILE PAYMENT SERVICES SUCH AS APPLE PAY, GOOGLE PAY, OR SAMSUNG PAY.
DENMARK
PERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION AGED 15+ THAT OWNS OR USES EACH PRODUCT OR SERVICE
FINANCIAL INCLUSION FACTORS
FEB
2022

79
41.8% 12.8% 13.7% 24.1% 8.1%
PURCHASED A PRODUCT
OR SERVICE ONLINE
ORDERED GROCERIES
VIA AN ONLINE STORE
BOUGHT A SECOND-HAND
ITEM VIA AN ONLINE STORE
USED AN ONLINE PRICE
COMPARISON SERVICE
USED A BUY NOW,
PAY LATER SERVICE
DENMARK
PERCENTAGE OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64 WHO ENGAGE IN SELECTED ECOMMERCE ACTIVITIES EACH WEEK
WEEKLY ONLINE SHOPPING ACTIVITIES
FEB
2022

80
60.4%
44.7%
41.2%
32.3%
28.2%
25.0%
21.1%
18.8%
17.4%
16.0%
11.9%
9.7%
9.0%
8.4%
6.5%
FREE DELIVERY
EASY RETURNS
SIMPLE ONLINE CHECKOUT
NEXT-DAY DELIVERY
CUSTOMER REVIEWS
COUPONS AND DISCOUNTS
CLICK & COLLECT
“GUEST” CHECK-OUT
LOYALTY POINTS
ECO-FRIENDLY CREDENTIALS
INTEREST-FREE INSTALMENT OPTION
COMPETITIONS
“LIKES” AND COMMENTS ON SOCIAL
LIVE-CHAT BOX
EXCLUSIVE CONTENT
DENMARK
PERCENTAGE OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64 WHO SAY EACH FACTOR WOULD ENCOURAGE THEM TO COMPLETE AN ONLINE PURCHASE
ONLINE PURCHASE DRIVERS
FEB
2022

81
4.12 $9.16 $2,221 37.4%
MILLION BILLION
+3.7% (+146 THOUSAND) +7.9% (+$673 MILLION) +4.1% (+$87.80) +4.2% (+150 BPS)
NUMBER OF PEOPLE
PURCHASING CONSUMER
GOODS VIA THE INTERNET
TOTAL ANNUAL SPEND
ON ONLINE CONSUMER
GOODS PURCHASES (USD)
AVERAGE ANNUAL REVENUE
PER CONSUMER GOODS
ECOMMERCE USER (USD)
SHARE OF CONSUMER GOODS
ECOMMERCE SPEND ATTRIBUTABLE TO
PURCHASES MADE VIA MOBILE PHONES
SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: “CONSUMER GOODS” INCLUDE: ELECTRONICS, FASHION, FURNITURE, TOYS, HOBBY, DIY, BEAUTY, CONSUMER
HEALTHCARE, PERSONAL CARE, HOUSEHOLD CARE, FOOD, BEVERAGES, AND PHYSICAL MEDIA. FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES FOR FULL-YEAR 2021, AND COMPARISONS WITH EQUIVALENT VALUES FOR THE
PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. FINANCIAL VALUES ARE IN U.S. DOLLARS. PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES ARE RELATIVE (I.E. AN INCREASE OF 20% FROM A STARTING VALUE OF 50% WOULD EQUAL 60%, NOT 70%).
“BPS” VALUES REPRESENT BASIS POINTS, AND INDICATE ABSOLUTE CHANGE. COMPARABILITY: BASE AND CATEGORY DEFINITION CHANGES. FIGURES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS.
DENMARK
HEADLINES FOR THE ADOPTION AND USE OF CONSUMER GOODS ECOMMERCE (B2C ONLY)
OVERVIEW OF CONSUMER GOODS ECOMMERCE
FEB
2022

82
$686.5 $508.0 $492.0 $287.6
+5.1% (+$33 MILLION) +8.4% (+$39 MILLION) +6.8% (+$31 MILLION) +3.5% (+$9.7 MILLION)
$2.64 $2.48 $1.41 $649.3
BILLION BILLION BILLION MILLION
+8.6% (+$208 MILLION) +8.2% (+$188 MILLION) +8.8% (+$114 MILLION) +8.3% (+$50 MILLION)
PERSONAL & HOUSEHOLD CARE FOOD BEVERAGES PHYSICAL MEDIA
ELECTRONICS FASHION FURNITURE TOYS, HOBBY, DIY
SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES OF FULL-YEAR REVENUES FOR 2021 IN U.S. DOLLARS, AND COMPARISONS WITH
EQUIVALENT VALUES FOR THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. THE “PERSONAL & HOUSEHOLD CARE” CATEGORY INCLUDES BEAUTY AND CONSUMER HEALTHCARE. THE “PHYSICAL MEDIA” CATEGORY DOES NOT
INCLUDE DIGITAL DOWNLOADS OR STREAMING. COMPARABILITY: BASE AND CATEGORY DEFINITION CHANGES. FIGURES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS.
DENMARK
ANNUAL SPEND IN EACH CONSUMER GOODS ECOMMERCE CATEGORY (U.S. DOLLARS, B2C ONLY)
ECOMMERCE: CONSUMER GOODS CATEGORIES
FEB
2022

83
01 NIKE 100
02 SKO 63
03 JYSK 35
04 ELGIGANTEN 32
05 IPHONE 12 30
06 POKEMON 29
07 HARALD NYBORG 27
08 ØRERINGE 18
09 NIKE SKO 17
10 DBA 17
11 IPHONE 11 16
12 GOOGLE 16
13 NIKE AIR FORCE 1 15
14 IPHONE 12 PRO 14
15 ZALANDO 14
16 NINTENDO SWITCH 13
17 FIDGET TOYS 13
18 YOUTUBE 8
19 POP IT 8
20 PLAYSTATION 4 8
SOURCE: GOOGLE TRENDS, BASED ON GOOGLE SHOPPING SEARCHES CONDUCTED BETWEEN 01 JANUARY 2021 AND 31 DECEMBER 2021. NOTES: ANY SPELLING ERRORS OR LANGUAGE INCONSISTENCIES
IN SEARCH QUERIES ARE AS PUBLISHED BY GOOGLE TRENDS, AND ARE SHOWN “AS IS”, TO ENABLE READERS TO IDENTIFY POTENTIAL CHANGES IN HOW PEOPLE USE LANGUAGE IN DIGITAL ENVIRONMENTS.
GOOGLE DOES NOT PUBLISH ABSOLUTE SEARCH VOLUMES, BUT THE “INDEX vs. TOP QUERY” COLUMN SHOWS RELATIVE SEARCH VOLUMES FOR EACH QUERY COMPARED WITH THE SEARCH VOLUME OF THE
TOP QUERY. ADVISORY: GOOGLE TRENDS USES DYNAMIC SAMPLING, SO RANK ORDER AND INDEX VALUES MAY VARY DEPENDING ON WHEN THE TOOL IS ACCESSED, EVEN FOR THE SAME TIME PERIOD.
DENMARK
QUERIES WITH THE GREATEST VOLUME OF GOOGLE SHOPPING SEARCH ACTIVITY BETWEEN 01 JANUARY 2021 AND 31 DECEMBER 2021
TOP GOOGLE SHOPPING QUERIES
FEB
2022

84
$451.5 $1.14 $194.9 $4.32
MILLION BILLION MILLION MILLION
+41% (+$131 MILLION) +67% (+$455 MILLION) +59% (+$72 MILLION) +84% (+$2.0 MILLION)
$496.3 $67.36 $42.39 $28.49
+25% (+$98 MILLION) -11% (-$8.3 MILLION) -33% (-$20 MILLION) +14% (+$3.5 MILLION)
HOTELS PACKAGE HOLIDAYS VACATION RENTALS CRUISES
FLIGHTS CAR RENTALS TRAINS LONG-DISTANCE BUSES
SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK; STATISTA MOBILITY MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES OF FULL-YEAR REVENUES FOR 2021 IN
U.S. DOLLARS, AND COMPARISONS WITH EQUIVALENT VALUES FOR THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. VALUES DO NOT INCLUDE REVENUES ASSOCIATED WITH PUBLIC TRANSPORT, NON-COMMERCIAL FLIGHTS,
FERRIES, TAXIS, RIDE-SHARING, RIDE-HAILING, OR CHAUFFEUR SERVICES. COMPARABILITY: BASE AND CATEGORY DEFINITION CHANGES. FIGURES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS.
DENMARK
ANNUAL SPEND ON ONLINE TRAVEL AND TOURISM SERVICES (U.S. DOLLARS)
ONLINE TRAVEL AND TOURISM
FEB
2022

85
$797.5 $265.0 $313.2 $103.6 $115.7
MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION
+18.7% (+$126 MILLION) +16.7% (+$38 MILLION) +20.0% (+$52 MILLION) +13.8% (+$13 MILLION) +24.6% (+$23 MILLION)
TOTAL VIDEO GAMES VIDEO-ON-DEMAND EPUBLISHING DIGITAL MUSIC
SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES FOR FULL-YEAR SPEND IN 2021 IN U.S. DOLLARS, AND COMPARISONS WITH
EQUIVALENT VALUES FOR THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. INCLUDES CONTENT DOWNLOADS AND SUBSCRIPTIONS TO STREAMING SERVICES AND ONLINE PUBLISHERS. DOES NOT INCLUDE PHYSICAL MEDIA
OR USER-GENERATED CONTENT. COMPARABILITY: BASE AND CATEGORY DEFINITION CHANGES. FIGURES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS.
DENMARK
ANNUAL SPEND ON DIGITAL MEDIA DOWNLOADS AND SUBSCRIPTIONS
DIGITAL MEDIA SPEND
FEB
2022

86
2.79 +31.8% $390.8 +39.5% $140
MILLION +674 THOUSAND MILLION +$111 MILLION YOY: +5.9%
NUMBER OF PEOPLE
ORDERING FOOD DELIVERY
VIA ONLINE PLATFORMS
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE IN
THE NUMBER OF ONLINE
FOOD DELIVERY USERS
TOTAL ANNUAL VALUE
OF ONLINE FOOD
DELIVERY ORDERS (USD)
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN THE VALUE OF ONLINE
FOOD DELIVERY ORDERS
AVERAGE ANNUAL VALUE
OF ONLINE FOOD DELIVERY
ORDERS PER USER (USD)
SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES FOR FULL-YEAR 2021, AND COMPARISONS WITH EQUIVALENT VALUES FOR THE
PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. FINANCIAL VALUES ARE IN U.S. DOLLARS. ONLY INCLUDES ORDERS MADE VIA ONLINE SERVICES. PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES ARE RELATIVE (I.E. AN INCREASE OF 20% FROM A
STARTING VALUE OF 50% WOULD EQUAL 60%, NOT 70%). “BPS” VALUES REPRESENT BASIS POINTS, AND INDICATE ABSOLUTE CHANGE. COMPARABILITY: BASE AND CATEGORY DEFINITION CHANGES. FIGURES
ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS.
DENMARK
HEADLINES FOR THE ADOPTION AND USE OF ONLINE FOOD DELIVERY SERVICES
ONLINE FOOD DELIVERY OVERVIEW
FEB
2022

87
4.15 +3.8% $21.74 +29.2% $5,234
MILLION +150 THOUSAND BILLION +$4.9 BILLION YOY: +25%
NUMBER OF
PEOPLE MAKING
DIGITAL PAYMENTS
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE
MAKING DIGITAL PAYMENTS
TOTAL ANNUAL VALUE
OF DIGITAL PAYMENT
TRANSACTIONS (USD)
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN THE VALUE OF DIGITAL
PAYMENT TRANSACTIONS
AVERAGE ANNUAL VALUE
OF DIGITAL PAYMENTS
PER USER (USD)
SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: “DIGITAL PAYMENTS” INCLUDE MOBILE P.O.S. PAYMENTS (E.G. PAYMENTS VIA APPLE PAY OR SAMSUNG PAY), B2C
DIGITAL COMMERCE, AND B2C DIGITAL REMITTANCES. VALUES DO NOT INCLUDE B2B TRANSACTIONS. FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES FOR FULL-YEAR FOR 2021, AND COMPARISONS WITH EQUIVALENT VALUES
FOR THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. FINANCIAL VALUES ARE IN U.S. DOLLARS. PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES ARE RELATIVE (I.E. AN INCREASE OF 20% FROM A STARTING VALUE OF 50% WOULD EQUAL 60%,
NOT 70%). “BPS” VALUES REPRESENT BASIS POINTS, AND INDICATE ABSOLUTE CHANGE. COMPARABILITY: BASE CHANGES. FIGURES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS.
DENMARK
HEADLINES FOR THE ADOPTION AND USE OF DIGITALLY ENABLED PAYMENT SERVICES BY END CONSUMERS
OVERVIEW OF CONSUMER DIGITAL PAYMENTS
FEB
2022

89
37.1%
31.5%
19.6%
17.7%
17.1%
16.6%
15.2%
14.6%
14.6%
14.2%
12.8%
12.4%
12.1%
12.0%
10.9%
SEARCH ENGINES
WORD-OF-MOUTH
TV ADS
SOCIAL MEDIA ADS
PRODUCT COMPARISON SITES
PRODUCT SAMPLES
SOCIAL MEDIA COMMENTS
ADS ON WEBSITES
CONSUMER REVIEW SITES
COMPANY EMAILS OR LETTERS
BRAND WEBSITES
PRINT ADS
ADS IN MOBILE APPS
TV SHOWS AND FILMS
IN-STORE DISPLAYS & PROMOTIONS
DENMARK
PERCENTAGE OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64 WHO DISCOVER NEW BRANDS, PRODUCTS, AND SERVICES VIA EACH CHANNEL OR MEDIUM
SOURCES OF BRAND DISCOVERY
FEB
2022

90
43.6% 48.8% 12.8% 10.0% 9.4%
RESEARCH BRANDS
ONLINE BEFORE
MAKING A PURCHASE
VISITED A BRAND’S
WEBSITE IN THE
PAST 30 DAYS
CLICKED OR TAPPED
ON A BANNER AD ON A
WEBSITE IN THE PAST 30 DAYS
CLICKED OR TAPPED ON A
SPONSORED SOCIAL MEDIA
POST IN THE PAST 30 DAYS
DOWNLOADED OR
USED A BRANDED MOBILE
APP IN THE PAST 30 DAYS
DENMARK
PERCENTAGE OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64 WHO SAY THEY ENGAGE IN EACH KIND OF ONLINE ACTIVITY
ENGAGEMENT WITH DIGITAL MARKETING
FEB
2022

91
56.6%
29.3%
28.1%
27.9%
25.6%
19.6%
17.8%
13.6%
11.8%
10.4%
7.2%
6.9%
6.4%
5.5%
5.2%
SEARCH ENGINES
SOCIAL NETWORKS
CONSUMER REVIEWS
PRICE COMPARISON SITES
BRAND WEBSITES
SPECIALIST REVIEW SITES
Q&A SITES
MOBILE APPS
FORUMS & MESSAGE BOARDS
DISCOUNT COUPON SITES
BRAND & PRODUCT BLOGS
MESSAGING & LIVE CHAT
ONLINE PINBOARDS
VLOGS
VIDEO SITES
DENMARK
PERCENTAGE OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16 TO 64 WHO USE EACH CHANNEL AS A PRIMARY SOURCE OF INFORMATION WHEN RESEARCHING BRANDS
MAIN CHANNELS FOR ONLINE BRAND RESEARCH
FEB
2022

92
$1.39 $704.6 $429.4 $141.0 $110.8
BILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION MILLION
+17.7% (+$208 MILLION) +18.9% (+$112 MILLION) +16.9% (+$62 MILLION) +21.3% (+$25 MILLION) +9.2% (+$9.3 MILLION)
TOTAL SEARCH ADS BANNER ADS VIDEO ADS CLASSIFIEDS
SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES FOR FULL-YEAR SPEND IN 2021 IN U.S. DOLLARS, AND COMPARISONS WITH
EQUIVALENT VALUES FOR THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. DOES NOT INCLUDE ADVERTISING REVENUES ASSOCIATED WITH EMAIL MARKETING, AUDIO ADS, INFLUENCER MARKETING, SPONSORSHIPS,
PRODUCT PLACEMENT, OR COMMISSION-BASED AFFILIATE SYSTEMS. COMPARABILITY: BASE CHANGES. FIGURES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS.
DENMARK
ANNUAL SPEND ON DIGITAL ADVERTISING, WITH DETAIL BY ADVERTISING FORMAT (U.S. DOLLARS)
VALUE OF THE DIGITAL ADVERTISING MARKET
FEB
2022

93
28.9% +2.6% $401.1 +20.7%
+73 BPS MILLION +$69 MILLION
SOCIAL MEDIA’S SHARE
OF TOTAL DIGITAL
ADVERTISING SPEND
SOCIAL MEDIA’S SHARE OF TOTAL
DIGITAL ADVERTISING SPEND
ANNUAL SPEND
ON SOCIAL MEDIA
ADVERTISING (USD)
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN SOCIAL MEDIA
ADVERTISING SPEND
SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES FOR FULL-YEAR 2021, AND COMPARISONS WITH EQUIVALENT VALUES FOR
THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. FINANCIAL VALUES ARE IN U.S. DOLLARS. DOES NOT INCLUDE ADVERTISING REVENUES ASSOCIATED WITH EMAIL MARKETING, AUDIO ADS, INFLUENCER MARKETING,
SPONSORSHIPS, PRODUCT PLACEMENT, OR COMMISSION-BASED AFFILIATE SYSTEMS. PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES ARE RELATIVE (I.E. AN INCREASE OF 20% FROM A STARTING VALUE OF 50% WOULD EQUAL
60%, NOT 70%). “BPS” VALUES REPRESENT BASIS POINTS, AND INDICATE ABSOLUTE CHANGE. COMPARABILITY: BASE CHANGES. FIGURES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS.
DENMARK
SOCIAL MEDIA’S SHARE OF THE DIGITAL ADVERTISING MARKET
SOCIAL MEDIA ADVERTISING OVERVIEW
FEB
2022

94
83.9% +1.4% $1.16 +19.3%
+115 BPS BILLION +$188 MILLION
PROGRAMMATIC’S
SHARE OF TOTAL DIGITAL
ADVERTISING SPEND
PROGRAMMATIC’S SHARE OF
TOTAL DIGITAL ADVERTISING SPEND
ANNUAL SPEND ON
PROGRAMMATIC
ADVERTISING (USD)
YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE
IN PROGRAMMATIC
ADVERTISING SPEND (USD)
SOURCE: STATISTA DIGITAL MARKET OUTLOOK. SEE STATISTA.COM FOR MORE DETAILS. NOTES: FIGURES REPRESENT ESTIMATES FOR FULL-YEAR 2021, AND COMPARISONS WITH EQUIVALENT VALUES FOR
THE PREVIOUS CALENDAR YEAR. FINANCIAL VALUES ARE IN U.S. DOLLARS. DOES NOT INCLUDE ADVERTISING REVENUES ASSOCIATED WITH EMAIL MARKETING, AUDIO ADS, INFLUENCER MARKETING,
SPONSORSHIPS, PRODUCT PLACEMENT, OR COMMISSION-BASED AFFILIATE SYSTEMS. PERCENTAGE CHANGE VALUES ARE RELATIVE (I.E. AN INCREASE OF 20% FROM A STARTING VALUE OF 50% WOULD EQUAL
60%, NOT 70%). “BPS” VALUES REPRESENT BASIS POINTS, AND INDICATE ABSOLUTE CHANGE. COMPARABILITY: BASE CHANGES. FIGURES ARE NOT COMPARABLE WITH PREVIOUS REPORTS.
DENMARK
SHARE OF DIGITAL ADVERTISING FULFILLED VIA PROGRAMMATIC TECHNOLOGIES
PROGRAMMATIC ADVERTISING OVERVIEW
FEB
2022

_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL
2022_
_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL2022_DIGITAL
2022_
We are a global socially-led creative agency, with unrivaled
social media expertise.
With 1,000+ people in 15 oﬃces spanning four continents, we
deliver a global perspective to our clients in a time when social
media is shaping culture.
We make ideas powered by people. We understand social
behaviours within online communities, cultures and
subcultures, spanning the social and gaming landscape.
We work with the world’s biggest brands, including adidas,
Samsung, Netﬂix and Google, to reach the right people in a
strategic, relevant and effective way.
wearesocial.com
A B O U T
W E A R E S O C I A L

Learn more at kepios.com
LEARN MORE »
LEARN MORE »
LEARN MORE »
LEARN MORE »
LEARN MORE »
Go beyond headlines and
hypotheses to understand
what people are really doing
online, and turn insights into
actionable plans and results.
We research and produce
white-label content and co-
branded reports that offer
rich insights into what people
everywhere are doing online.
Add our team’s experience
and insight to your decision-
making. Available through
regular, retained advisory, or
ad hoc for one-off sessions.
Custom keynote presentations
that bring the latest digital
trends to life at conferences,
events, and private meetings,
whether online or in person.
Interactive briefings that
make it easy to keep track of
digital trends, and identify
how evolving behaviours
will impact future success.
CONSUMER
RESEARCH
REPORTS
& CONTENT
ADVISORY
SERVICES
KEYNOTE
PRESENTATIONS
DIGITAL
BRIEFINGS
In addition to producing the Global Digital Reports, we also offer:
Kepios helps the world understand what’s really happening online.
MAKE SENSE OF DIGITAL TRENDS

Get closer to your audience with
the world’s largest study on the
online consumer
18M+
consumers data points brands markets
40,000+ 4,000+ 40+
Book free demo

Diversity of industries
and topics
Statista bundles statistical data on over
80,000 topics from over 170 industries.
The data comes from over 22,500
sources.
Quick help
for all cases
With Statista, users can obtain
comprehensive overviews and conduct
targeted research – with minimal time
expenditure.
Global data from
numerous countries
Statista offers insights and facts on
industries from 150+ countries.
Markets, companies and consumers
from all over the world are highlighted.
Reliable and efficient
research basis
Statista has been the market leader in
providing business data for 13 years.
Companies, universities, schools and
the media trust our service.
CLICK HERE TO DISCOVER OUR ACCOUNTS
AND FIND DATA FOR YOUR BUSINESS COSMOS
Statista – a universe of data

Extensive
Datasets
We provide data on every mobile
operator in every country
worldwide, with over 30 million
data points, updated daily.
Annually, GSMA Intelligence
publishes over 100 reports and
exclusive analyses, adding greater
insight into our data and
supporting our customers in
making stronger business choices.
Our forecasting experts provide a
five-year (and beyond) view into the
future, enabling long-term investment
planning. Updated quarterly, our
forecasts are consistently accurate
within +/- 2.5 % of reported data.
Topical and
Timely
Research
Pinpoint
Accuracy
We serve a wide array of industries in the
mobile ecosystem and beyond, including
most of the world’s mobile operators plus
major vendors, regulators, international
institutions and vertical sectors ranging
from automotive to retail.
Industry
Trusted
3 Global
Offices
Delhi Barcelona London
Serves over
800
organisations
40,000
users worldwide
Definitive data and analysis
for the mobile industry

Semrush .Trends
Data. Insights. Impact.
Semrush .Trends provides instant market overview
and competitive digital insights for those who are
looking to grow their business.
It enables an in-depth view of market conditions
and trends for creating a growth-driven marketing
strategy.
All-encompassing insights for any
website, industry or market across
190 countries & regions
A single solution with 50+ tools
for your strategic vision
Accurate data for real-time market
and competitive insights

Similarweb
provides insights
for any website,
app, industry and
market
Websites
100M+
Apps
4.7M+
Countries
190+
Industries
210+
Search Terms
1B+
E-commerce
product SKUs
250M+

Prior to our Digital 2021 reports, we included data
sourced from social media platforms’ self-service
advertising tools in our calculations of internet user
numbers, but we no longer include this data in our
internet user figures. This is because the user numbers
reported by social media platforms are typically based
on active user accounts, and may not represent unique
individuals. For example, one person may maintain
more than one active presence (account) on the same
social media platform. Similarly, some accounts may
represent ‘non-human’ entities, including: pets and
animals; historical figures; businesses, causes, groups,
and organisations; places of interest; etc.
As a result, the figures we report for social media users
may exceed internet user numbers. However, while this
may seem counter-intuitive or surprising, such instances
do not represent errors in the data or in our reporting.
Rather, these differences may indicate delays in the
reporting of internet user numbers, or they may indicate
higher instances of individuals managing multiple
social media accounts, or ‘non-human’ social media
accounts.
If you have any questions about specific data
points in these reports, or if you’d like to offer your
organisation’s data for consideration in future reports,
please email our reports team: reports@kepios.com.
footnotes of each relevant chart, but please use caution
when comparing data from different reports, because
changes to research samples, base data, research
methodologies, and approaches to reporting may
mean that values are not comparable.
Furthermore, due to the differing data collection and
treatment methodologies, and the different periods
during which data have been collected, there may be
significant differences in the reported metrics for similar
data points throughout this report. For example, data
from surveys often varies over time, even if that data
has been collected by the same organisation using the
same approach in each wave of their research.
In particular, reports of internet user numbers vary
considerably between different sources and over time.
In part, this is because there are significant challenges
associated with collecting, analysing, and publishing
internet user data on a regular basis, not least because
research into public internet use necessitates the use of
face-to-face surveys. Different organisations may also
adopt different approaches to sampling the population
for research into internet use, and variations in areas
such as the age range of the survey population, or the
balance between urban and rural respondents, may
play an important role in determining eventual findings.
Note that COVID-19 has limited internet user research.
Note: This page is a summary of our comprehensive
notes on data variance, potential mismatches,
and curiosities, which you can read in full at
https://datareportal.com/notes-on-data.
This report features data from a wide variety of
different sources, including market research agencies,
internet and social media companies, governments,
public bodies, news media, and private individuals, as
well as extrapolations and analysis of that data.
Wherever possible, we’ve prioritised data sources
that provide broader geographical coverage, in
order to minimise potential variations between data
points, and to offer more reliable comparison across
countries. However, where we believe that standalone
metrics provide a more reliable reference, we use such
standalone numbers to ensure more accurate reporting.
Please note that some data points may only be
available for a limited selection of countries, so we
may not be able to report the same data in all reports.
From time to time, we may also change the source(s)
that we use to inform specific data points. As a result,
some figures may appear to change in unexpected
ways from one report to another. Wherever we’re
aware of these changes, we include details in the
NOTES ON DATA VARIANCE, MISMATCHES, AND CURIOSITIES

anyone else for any direct, indirect, punitive,
incidental, special, consequential, exemplary
or similar loss or damage, or loss or damage
of any kind, suffered by you or anyone else as
a result of any use, action or decision taken by
you or anyone else in any way connected to
this report or the information contained herein,
or the result(s) thereof, even if advised of the
possibility of such loss or damage.
This report may contain reference to third-
party data providers, however this report
does not endorse any such third parties or
their products or services, nor is this report
sponsored by, endorsed by or associated with
such third parties.
Except for those portions of this report relating
to the perspectives of We Are Social, this
report and any opinions contained herein
have been prepared by Kepios, and have not
been specifically approved or disapproved
by We Are Social. This report is subject to
change without notice. To ensure you have the
most recent version of this report, please visit
our website at https://datareportal.com/.
This report contains data, tables, figures,
maps, flags, analyses and technical notes
that relate to various geographical territories
around the world, however reference to
these territories and any associated elements
(including names and flags) does not imply
the expression of any opinion whatsoever
on the part of Kepios, We Are Social, or
any of the featured brands, nor any of those
organisations’ partners, affiliates, employees
or agents, concerning the legal status of
any country, territory, city or area or of its
authorities, or concerning the delimitation of
its frontiers or boundaries.
This report is provided with the understanding
that it does not constitute professional
advice or services of any kind and
should therefore not be substituted for
independent investigations, thought or
judgment. Accordingly, neither Kepios, nor
We Are Social, nor any of the brands and
organisations featured or cited herein, nor any
of their partners, affiliates, group companies,
employees or agents shall, to the fullest
extent permitted by law, be liable to you or
This report has been compiled by Kepios Pte.
Ltd. (“Kepios”) on behalf of We Are Social
Ltd. (“We Are Social”) for informational
purposes only, and relies on data from a wide
variety of sources, including but not limited
to public and private companies, market
research firms, government agencies, NGOs,
and private individuals.
While Kepios and We Are Social strive to
ensure that all data and charts contained in
this report are, as at the time of publishing,
accurate and up-to-date, neither Kepios, nor
We Are Social, nor any of the other featured
brands and organisations shall be responsible
for any errors or omissions contained in this
report, or for the results obtained from its use.
All information contained in this report
is provided “as is”, with no guarantee
whatsoever of its accuracy, completeness,
correctness or non-infringement of third-
party rights and without warranty of any
kind, express or implied, including without
limitation, warranties of merchantability or
fitness for any particular purpose.
DISCLAIMER AND IMPORTANT NOTES

DATAREPORTAL.COM
REPORTS@KEPIOS.COM
@ESKIMON
SIMON KEMP

Digital 2022 Denmark (February 2022) v01

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (20)

More from DataReportal

More from DataReportal (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Digital 2022 Denmark (February 2022) v01