This document discusses Plateau Energy Metals' lithium and uranium projects in Peru. It summarizes the Falchani lithium project as a clean tech strategic asset, with a large, high-quality resource that is amenable to open pit mining. It also summarizes the Macusani uranium project as a green energy enabler, with strong project economics and potential for growth. Both projects have excellent infrastructure and are located in a geopolitically stable jurisdiction in Peru. The document outlines the company's growth plans for advancing the projects through economic studies and development.

1. Enabling the New Energy Paradigm
TSXV: PLU | OTCQB: PLUUF

2. Plateau’s Projects in Peru
2
Falchani Lithium
A Clean Tech Strategic Asset
Macusani Uranium
A Green Energy Enabler

3. FALCHANI LITHIUM PROJECT
The Electric Revolution
Plateau Energy Metals

4. 4
Source: World Health Organization
91%
Of the world’s population lives in
places where air quality exceeds WHO
guideline limits
3.8 million
Deaths every year as a result of
exposure to smoke from dirty
cookstoves and fuels
4.2 million
Deaths every year as a result of
exposure to ambient (outdoor) air
pollution 4
Pollution is the Driving Force

5. Source: Benchmark Mineral Intelligence, February 2019 publication (Financing 2030: How Much Money & Material is Needed to Make the EV Supply Chain Happen?)
The World is Changing
5
Canada
Target of 30% penetration of EV sales by
2030 (Quebec targeting 100% zero
emissions by 2050)
BC recently tabled Zero Emissions
Vehicles Act – 100% zero emission new
vehicle sales by 2040, targets starting
2025 at 10%
USA
No federal target set, 10 states have set
targets for 100% zero emissions vehicles
by 2050
Mexico & Brazil
Target of 30% penetration of electric
vehicle sales by 2030
Israel
Proposal to end ICE sales by 2030
India
Proposal to end ICE sales by 2030
China
Target of 5% penetration of EV sales by
2020, 20% by 2025
Japan & South Korea
Target of 30% penetration of EV sales by
2030
Government Policy Continues to Support Electric Vehicle Adoption
UK & France
Proposal to end ICE (internal combustion engines) by
2040
Norway & Netherlands
Proposal to end ICE sales by 2035
Germany
Proposal to end ICE sales by 2030
Italy
Target of 30% penetration of EV sales by 2030
Europe
Considerations for EU wide ban of ICE by 2030

6. Source: Visualist Capital (February 2017)
Lithium-ion batteries are essential in current and future
technology as the world becomes greener.
Lithium – The Adopted Battery
Technology
6

7. Since 2010, +80% reduction in cost per kWh, and with 25% of the cost of an electric vehicle (EV) being
the battery, more affordable EVs will hit the market, leading to mass adoption.
Source: Benchmark Mineral Intelligence
Lower Battery Costs = Mass Adoption
7

8. Growing Sectors Consumers Demand
Demand for lithium is
growing 20% per year *
* Source: Benchmark Mineral Intelligence
Lithium – A Growing Need

9. Electric Vehicle Adoption Rates
Source: Dent Research
EV – Be an Early Investor
9

10. Quality
• Met testing indicates
a high purity battery
grade (> 99.5%)
lithium carbonate
can be produced ***
Development
Potential
• Amenable to open
pit mining
Growth Potential
• Estimated to be 6th
largest Li deposit
globally*
• Resource estimate**
based on only ~30% of
target area
Excellent
Infrastructure
• Easy transport
• Low cost power
• Labour
• Water
Supply Security
(Peru)
• Geopolitical stable
jurisdiction
• Responsible mining
practices
* Based on the Company’s review of publicly available information as at March 4, 2019
** Includes inferred resources. Refer to the Falchani NI 43-101 technical report effective March 1, 2019 & detailed on the last page of this presentation
*** Refer to the Company’s news release on July 18, 2019.
Falchani Lithium Project
A clean tech strategic asset
10

11. Falchani Lithium: Growth Plan
11
Kick off PEA
Appointed Advisory Board
Resource Update
• Expanded resources +90%
David Laing
Metallurgical Studies Ph II
• Completed Phase II work program that
determined tank leaching and sulfation
baking can produce a high purity (> 99.5%)
lithium carbonate
Techno-economic
Trade-off Studies
• High-level trade-off studies
selected tank leaching as the
preferred processing route
Falchani PEA
• Targeting PEA mid 2019
Q1 2019
(complete)
Q1 2019
(complete)
Q1 2019
(complete)
Mid 2019
(complete)
Mid 2019
(complete)
Mid 2019

12. Cleaner, Safer & Efficient Energy
Plateau Energy Metals

13. Source: World Health Organization and Cameco (2018)
Nuclear Energy is Clean
Source: World Health Organization
Source: http://www.world-nuclear.org/nuclear-basics/greenhouse-gas-emissions-avoided.aspx 13
To produce the same amount of electricity, nuclear
energy produces 96% less CO2 than oil
4.2 million
Deaths every year as a result of exposure to
ambient (outdoor) air pollution

14. * Source Harvard University (http://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2016/reconsidering-risks-nuclear-power/)
14
Nuclear Energy is Safe
14
“…On a per kWh of energy produced basis, both the European Union and the Paul Scherrer
Institute, the largest Swiss national research institute, found…. nuclear power is the benchmark to
beat, outranking coal, oil, gas, and even wind by a slight margin as the least deadly major energy
resource in application.”
Source Harvard University (http://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2016/reconsidering-risks-nuclear-power/) 14

15. Nuclear Energy is Efficient
15

16. Nuclear – Growing Capacity
16
2 reactors
2500 Gross MWe
1 reactors
29 Gross MWe
4 reactors
6290 Gross MWe
8 reactors
7080 Gross MWe
30 reactors
31196 Gross MWe
4 reactors
5600 Gross MWe
Total Nuclear Reactors
Under Construction
Reactors = 49
Gross Mwe = 52,695
Source: World Nuclear Association (June 2019)
450
Nuclear reactors in operation today
10%
Of the world’s energy is nuclear
30
New countries are planning nuclear
16
Source: World Nuclear Association (June 2019)

17. Strong Project
Economics (1)(2)
• NPV = US$603M
• IRR(8%) = 40.6%
• Payback = 1.8 yrs
• Large, low cost
Growth
Potential
• Scalable, flexible
mine plan
• Porous volcanic
rock -> rapid leach,
low acid
Control all U3O8
Resources in
Peru (1)
• M&I resources = 52.9
Mlbs U3O8
(3)
• Inferred resources =
72.1 Mlbs U3O8
(4)
Excellent
Infrastructure
• Easy transport
• Low cost power
• Labour
• Water
Located in
Peru
• Geopolitical stable
jurisdiction
• Responsible mining
practices
(1) See IMPORTANT CAUTION regarding PEA on the last page of this presentation
(2) Using US$50/lb uranium price
(3) At an average grade of 248ppm (75ppm U cut off). Refer to the Company’s technical report filed on SEDAR on January 12, 2016 and see the last page of this presentation
(4) At an average grade of 251ppm (75ppm U cut off). Refer to the Company’s technical report filed on SEDAR on January 12, 2016 and see the last page of this presentation
17
Macusani Uranium Project
A green energy enabler

18. 18
Macusani Uranium: Growth Plan

19. 19
PlateauEnergyMetals.com
(416) 628-9600
Alex@PlateauEnergyMetals.com
@pluenergy
Alex Holmes, CEO & Director

20. Cautionary Language
20
This presentation is provided for informational purposes only and the opinions expressed are based upon our analysis and interpretation and are not to be construed as a solicitation
or offer to buy or sell the securities mentioned herein. The particulars contained herein were obtained from sources which we believe reliable but are not guaranteed by us and may
be incomplete. This presentation includes forward-looking information or forward-looking statements concerning the future performance of Plateau Energy Metals Inc.’s (“Plateau” or
the “Company”) business, operations and financial performance and condition, as well as management's objectives, strategies, beliefs and intentions that involve risks, uncertainties
and other factors that could cause actual results to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Except for statements of historical fact
relating to Plateau, certain information contained herein constitutes forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are frequently identified by such words as "may", "will",
"plan", "expect", "anticipate", "estimate", "intend", “could”, “might”, “believe”, “potential”, “amenable” and similar words referring to future events and results. Forward-looking
statements are based on the current opinions and reasonable expectations of management and there can be no certainty that they will accurately reflect actual results. All forward-
looking information is inherently uncertain and subject to a variety of assumptions, risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to, the speculative nature of mineral exploration
and development, the availability of financing, fluctuating commodity prices, competitive risks, variations in grades or recovery rates, the interpretation of drill results, the geology,
grade and continuity of mineral deposits and conclusions of economic evaluations, results of any initial feasibility, pre-feasibility and feasibility studies, and the possibility that any
future exploration, development or mining results will not be consistent with our expectations. Mining and development risks, including risks related to accidents, equipment
breakdowns, unanticipated difficulties with or interruptions in exploration and development, the potential for delays in exploration or development activities or the completion of
feasibility studies, if any, the uncertainty of profitability based upon the cyclical nature of the industry in which we operate, delays in obtaining governmental approvals or in the
completion of development or construction activities, risks related to environmental regulation and liability, political and regulatory risks associated with mining and exploration, risks
related to the certainty of title to our properties, risks relating to international operations, fluctuating currency exchange rates, changes in project parameters, the possibility of project
cost overruns or unanticipated costs and expenses, labour disputes (including work stoppages and strikes) and other risks of the mining industry, failure of plant, equipment or
processes to operate as anticipated, as described in more detail in the Company's recent securities filings available at www.sedar.com. Actual events or results may differ materially
from those projected in the forward-looking statements and Plateau cautions against placing undue reliance thereon. Neither Plateau nor its management assume any obligation to
revise or update these forward-looking statements, except as required by securities laws. This presentation summarizes information about the Company and readers are encouraged
to review Plateau’s complete public disclosure.
All dollars referenced throughout this presentation are USD, unless otherwise noted.
Qualified Persons and Technical Reports
Mr. Ted O’Connor, P.Geo., a Director of Plateau Energy Metals, and a qualified person as defined by National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects, has
reviewed and approved the scientific and technical information contained in this presentation. Further information about the Falchani Lithium and the Macusani Uranium projects are
available in the NI 43-101 Technical Reports filed on SEDAR: “Mineral Resource Estimates for the Falchani Lithium Project in the Puno District of Peru" prepared by Mr. Stewart Nupen,
of The Mineral Corporation, effective March 1, 2019 and "Macusani Project, Macusani, Peru, NI 43-101 Report – Preliminary Economic Assessment” prepared by Mr. Michael Shor and
Mr. Thomas Apelt, of GBM Minerals Engineering Consultants Limited; Mr. David Young, of The Mineral Corporation; and Mr. Mark Mounde, of Wardell Armstrong International
Limited dated January 12, 2016, respectively.
The preliminary economic assessment is preliminary in nature, it includes inferred mineral resources that are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic
considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as mineral reserves, and there is no certainty that the preliminary economic assessment will be realized.
Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic value.