9. AN OLD FASHIONED APPROACH TO
NEW AGE WORLD
• Relying on intuition
• Not updated with current stats
• Irrelevance: using experience from past jobs,
although the industry may not be the same
10. This is an issue because..
• Increases scope for errors
• Increases chances of digression
And
most importantly,
• It cannot be applied to the new world of
startups, competition with CEOs under
30,recent yet dominant industries like IT and
E-Commerce and emerging new concepts like
IOT
13. The question is..
WHY IS
THIS A
PROBLEM?
Here are some key
statistics from the past
5 years…
14.
15.
16. The data from half a decade back
cannot be trusted due to the massive
shifts in Indian market. How can we
trust the experience from more than a
decade back?
19. VOLATILITY
• For those who even consider themselves ‘data
savvy’ or superficially show signs of involving
themselves with data in the form of feedback
and interaction,
• They are highly susceptible to misinterpreting
data
For example…
20. 1. Assuming small differences are meaningful
Many of the daily fluctuations in the stock market represent chance rather
than anything meaningful. Differences in polls when one party is ahead by a
point or two are often just statistical noise.
21. 2.Deceptive graphs
A lot of mischief occurs in the scaling and labeling of the vertical axis on
graphs. The labels should show the full meaningful range of whatever you’re
looking at.
http://theconversation.com/the-seven-deadly-sins-of-statistical-misinterpretation-and-how-to-avoid-them-74306
23. This indicates a
• Careless
• Carefree
• Immature
• Unreliable
• Un trustworthy
approach and attitude of a manager.
24. AN ADHD IN READING DATA
• This is clearly a poor a managerial trait.
• It leads to a lack of trust of the team in the
managers actions, thus leading to poor
cooperation and team building
• It leads to constantly taking up or scarping
projects which is indicative of indecisiveness and
immaturity
• Poor reading of data can lead to incorrect
contexts ,giving undue importance to wrongly
magnified issues or false causation correlation