PENALTIES IN GST

1. GST ACT ensures that it lays more and more emphasis on its compliances and
enforcement across all the areas including registration, returns, invoices ,etc.
The terms Offences and Penalties are not defined in the GST Law. However,
Offence in general means a breach of Law or Act or any illegal act and penalty is
defined as the punishment for committing an offence.
The provisions related to Offences and Penalties are covered in Chapter XIX ,
Sections 122 to 138 of the GST Act.The provisions of Penalty were there in the
extant laws too i.e. Service Tax, Excise and VAT.
The Act lists 21 offences in section 122 as follows: -
 Making a supply without invoice or with false/ incorrect invoice
 Issuing an invoice without making supply
 Not paying tax collected for a period exceeding three months
 Not paying tax collected in contravention of the provisions of the Act for a
period exceeding a period of three months
 Non deduction or short deduction of tax at source or failure to pay the same
to the government
 Non collection or short collection of tax at source or failure to pay the same
to the government
 Availing/utilizing input tax credit without actual receipt of goods and/or
services
 Fraudulently obtaining any refund
 Availing/distributing input tax credit in contravention of provisions of the
Act

2.  Falsification of Financial records or furnishing of false information,
documents, etc.
 Failure to apply for registration by a person liable to be registered
 Furnishing false particulars related to registration , either at the time of
application for registration or subsequently
 Preventing an officer from discharging his duties
 Transportation of goods without the cover of a document
 Suppressing turnover leading to tax evasion
 Failure to maintain accounts/ documents in the manner prescribed
 Failure to furnish accounts/records when called for
 Supplying/Storing or in anyway dealing with goods liable for confiscation
 Issuing an invoice using registration number of other person
 Tampering/destroying any material evidence
 Disposing off/ tampering with detained/seized/attached goods.
It may be noted that some of the above offences attract imprisonment too,
term of which is based on the value of the tax evaded or input tax credit
wrongly availed or utilized.
Below is the summary of the offences and their related punishment:-
1. supplies any goods or services or both without issue of any invoice
2. issues any invoice or bill without supply of goods or services or both in violation of the
provisions of this Act, or the rules made thereunder leading to wrongful availment or utilisation
of input tax credit or refund of tax
3. avails input tax credit using such invoice or bill referred to in clause (b)
4. collects any amount as tax but fails to pay the same to the Government beyond a period of
three months
5. evades tax, fraudulently avails input tax credit or fraudulently obtains refund and where such
offence is not covered under clauses (a) to (d)
6. falsifies or substitutes financial records or produces fake accounts or documents or furnishes
any false information
7. obstructs or prevents any officer in the discharge of his duties under this Act
8. acquires possession of, or in any way concerns himself in transporting, removing, depositing,
keeping, concealing, supplying, or purchasing or in any other manner deals with, any goods
which he knows are liable to confiscation
9. receives or is in any way concerned with the supply of, or in any other manner deals with any
supply of services which he knows are in contravention of the Act
10. tampers with or destroys any material evidence or documents;

3. 11. fails to supply any information which he is required to supply under this Act or supplies false
information
12. attempts to commit, or abets the commission of any of the offences mentioned in the above
clauses
In case of offence mentioned on s.6, 7, 10, imprisonment may extend upto 6
months.
It may further be noted that the offences mentioned in S.1 to 4 and involving
amount of tax evaded or input tax credit wrongly claimed greater than rupees Five
Crore are cognizable and non bailable. A cognizable offence is the one where the
authority has the power to arrest the accused without any warrant.
It may be noted that the amount of Penalty for similar offences under DVAT Act
and Service tax are different ,for example, penalty for failure to apply for
registration under DVAT Act is lower of Rupees One Thousand per Day or One
Lakh Rupees, in Service Tax the penalty for failure to apply for registration is
Rupees Ten Thousand , in case of ITC wrongly claimed in DVAT the amount of
Penalty is the amount of Input Tax Credit wrongly availed or Rupees Ten
Thousand, whichever is higher.
Section 122(2) of the Act deals with the cases where the registered person supplies
goods or services or both without payment of tax or short payment or obtaining
refund erroneously or wrongfully avails Input Tax credit , Penalty shall be as per
the below table:-

4. M/s Xerox India td. Vs State of Karnataka
Failure to pay tax along with returns –Bonafide doubt regarding the tax liability.
Dealer disputed tax liability on the basis of judgement of the Apex Court, apex
court later clarified conflicts on its own judgement. Assessee immediately paid the
tax with interest, penalty not leviable. Here the assessee has supplied goods
without payment of tax based on the judgement of the Apex Court and hence
penalty was not justifiable.
The levy of penalty is subject to a certain disciplinary regime which is based on
jurisprudence, principles of natural justice and principles governing international
trade and agreements. Such general disciplines related to penalty is enshrined in
section 126 of the Act. Accordingly—
 No penalty shall be imposed for minor breaches( amount of Tax involved is
less than Five Thousand rupees) of Tax regulations or procedural
requirements and in particular, any omission or mistake in documentation
which is easily rectifiable and made without fraudulent intent or gross
negligence.
 the penalty imposed shall depend on the facts and circumstances of each
case and shall be commensurate with the degree and severity of breach of
the provisions of the law or the rules alleged,
 no penalty is to be imposed without issuance of a show cause notice and
proper hearing in the matter, affording an opportunity to the person
proceeded against to rebut the allegations levelled against him,
• INR 10,000, OR
• 10% of Tax Due,
• WHICHEVER IS HIGHER
By reason other than
fraud, wilful
misstatement or or
suppression of Facts
• INR 10,000, OR
• Tax Due,
• WHICHEVER IS HIGHER
By reason of fraud,
wilful misstatement or
or suppression of Facts

5.  when a person voluntarily discloses to an officer under this act without the
prior discovery by the proper officer.
 The officer while imposing penalty under this act shall specify the nature of
the breach and the section in which he is imposing penalty.
Ex. M/s LG Electronics India Pvt Ltd. Vs The State of Punjab
In the said case , destination of Goods was shown as Lucknow whereas
actually the goods were sent to Ludhiana. Explanation was given that by
mistake code for Lucknow i.e. “ LUC” typed in place of code of Ludhiana “
LUD”. Assessee voluntarily reported the error and hence penalty cannot be
levied merely by the deficiency in documents.
It may be noted that penalty cannot be imposed merely on the information
given by anyone without any evidence.
In case of M/s Gupta Polymers v State of Haryana, it was held that imposition
of penalty merely on the statement of driver ignoring accompanying documents not
permissible. Movement of goods from Mumbai to Delhi in the course of import
from Mumbai to Delhi under proper document , no state tax involved. On
interrogation from the driver , he said that he was instructed to pass through the
branch at Faridabad, but here the intention was to collect some household items of
the manager. Hence, it may be concluded that penalty could not be imposed as the
documents were in favour of the assessee.
Section 122(3) provides for levy of penalty extending to Rs. 25,000/- for any
person who-
 aids or abets any of the 21 offences mentioned in Section 122(1)
 deals in any way (whether receiving, supplying, storing or transporting)
with goods that are liable to confiscation,
 receives or deals with supply of services in contravention of the Act,
 fails to appear before an authority who has issued a summon,
 fails to issue any invoice for a supply or account for any invoice in his books
of accounts.

6. Section 123 prescribes the penalty for failure to Furnish information return
required under section 150 , in such cases the penalty shall be Rupees Hundred
per day subject to a maximum of Five Thousand rupees.
Section 124 prescribes the penalty for failure to Furnish information or return
required under section 151 , or furnishing of Information which is false per the
person. In such a case the amount of Penalty shall be maximum Ten Thousand
Rupees.In case of continuing offence, the amount of penalty shall be Rupees
hundred per day subject to a maximum of Twenty Five thousand rupees.
There may be some offences which are not being covered by any of the previous
sections and the penalty in such case may extend upto Twenty five thousand
rupees.
It may be noted here that the government has the right to waive penalty , either
fully or partially for such class of tax payers and under such circumstances as may
be recommended by the council.
Where any person transports any goods or stores any goods while they are in
transit in contravention of the provisions of this Act or the rules made there under,
all such goods and conveyance used as a means of transport for carrying the said
goods and documents relating to such goods and conveyance shall be liable to
detention or seizure and after detention or seizure and they shall be released on
payment of tax and penalty. Penalty amount shall be determined on the basis of
whether the assessee has himself come forward or does not come forward himself
1. In case Assessee comes forward:- Penalty shall be Hundred percent of the
Tax. In case of exempted supply, the penalty shall be Twopercent of the
value of goods or Twenty five thousand rupees, whichever is less.
2. In case Assessee does not come forward:- Penalty shall be fifty percent of
the value of goods reduced by the tax already paid. In case of exempted
supply, the penalty shall be five percent of the value of goods or Twenty five
thousand rupees, whichever is less.
If the assessee has not paid the tax and the penalty , he may furnish a security for
the amount equivalent to the tax and penalty for getting his goods released.The
order for detention of goods must be passed before actually detaining the goods.

7. The goods shall be liable for confiscation in case of the following acts by the
person:-
 supplies or receives any goods in contravention of any of the provisions of
this Act or the rules made there under with intent to evade payment of tax; or
 does not account for any goods on which he is liable to pay tax under this
Act; or
 supplies any goods liable to tax under this Act without having applied for
registration; or
 contravenes any of the provisions of this Act or the rules made there under
with intent to evade payment of tax; or
 uses any conveyance as a means of transport for carriage of goods in
contravention of the provisions of this Act
Also, penalty shall be imposed on the person under section 122.It may further be
noted that the Adjudicating officer shall give the owner the option to pay fine in
lieu of confiscation. The amount of fine in such a case shall not exceed the market
value of the goods. The law has further clarified that the confiscation or penalty
shall not interfere with other punishment that may be inflicted on the concerned
person.
Section 133 deals with the provisions related to the liability on the officers. It states
that any person engaged in connection with collection of statistics under section
151 or compilation or computerization thereof shall not disclose the information to
anyone. In case of breach of the duty the person shall be liable to penalty which
may extend to Twenty Five Thousand rupees or with imprisonment upto six
months or both.
To avoid the time and the cost involved in the prosecution , Commissioner has
been granted power to compound the offence( section 138).It may be noted that
compounding can be done either at the time of , or before the prosecution , on
payment of the compounding amount that shall be determined in the manner
prescribed.
However, compounding shall not be allowed in the following cases:-
 person who has been allowed to compound once in respect of any of the
following offences:-

8. 1. supplies any goods or services or both without issue of any invoice
2. issues any invoice or bill without supply of goods or services or both in violation
of the provisions of this Act, or the rules made there under leading to wrongful
availment or utilisation of input tax credit or refund of tax
3. avails input tax credit using such invoice or bill referred to in clause (b)
4. collects any amount as tax but fails to pay the same to the Government beyond a
period of three months
5. evades tax, fraudulently avails input tax credit or fraudulently obtains refund and
where such offence is not covered under clauses (a) to (d)
 Person has been accused of committing an offence under this act which is
also an offence under any other law
 Person convicted under this Act by a court
 Person accused of committing the following offences:-
1. obstructs or prevents any officer in the discharge of his duties under this Act
2. tampers with or destroys any material evidence or documents;
3. fails to supply any information which he is required to supply under this Act or
supplies false information
Compounding of offences is allowed only after payment of the Tax, interest
and penalty involved. The amount for compounding shall be in the range of:-
Minimum: Ten Thousand Rupees or Fifty percent of Tax, whichever is
higher
Maximum : ThirtyThousand Rupees or Fifty percent of Tax, whichever is
higher

9. All the proceedings shall stand abated once the Compounding is done and
no further action is required to be taken by adjudicating authority.
The article has been written by CA. Ankita Garg
who can be reached at
cacsankitagarg@gmail.com
M:- 9999466272