SlideShare a Scribd company logo

How to Prove Reasonable Royalty Damages after Uniloc

•Download as PPT, PDF•
•
Woodard, Emhardt, Henry, Reeves & Wagner, LLP
Woodard, Emhardt, Henry, Reeves & Wagner, LLP

Below is a presentation describing current reasonable royalty case law for patents in view of the Federal Circuit’s recent Uniloc decision.

1 of 19
How to Prove Reasonable Royalty Damages after Uniloc March 3, 2011
Statutory Basis for Reasonable Royalty Damages and How to Prove Them ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Two kinds of recognized patent damages: ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Reasonable Royalty Methodologies ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Recent CAFC Reasonable Royalty Decisions ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Lucent Tech. v. Gateway, Inc. ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Lucent Tech. cont. Reasonable Royalty Analysis ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Lucent Tech. cont. Reasonable Royalty Analysis ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Lucent Tech. cont. Reasonable Royalty Analysis ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Lucent Tech. cont. Reasonable Royalty Analysis ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
i4i v. Microsoft ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
i4i Reasonable Royalty Analysis ,[object Object]
i4i cont. Reasonable Royalty Analysis ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
ResQNet.Com v. Lansa ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
ResQNet.com cont. Reasonable Royalty Analysis ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Wordtech v. Integrated Networks ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Microsoft v. Uniloc ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
The Remand – What’s the Strategy Now? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
The Uniloc Remand – cont. ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Recommended

EDiscovery Presentation
EDiscovery PresentationEDiscovery Presentation
EDiscovery Presentation
scubastog
 
Software patents
Software patents Software patents
Software patents
Andres Guadamuz
 
Seventh Circuit Ediscovery Pilot Program
Seventh Circuit Ediscovery Pilot ProgramSeventh Circuit Ediscovery Pilot Program
Seventh Circuit Ediscovery Pilot Program
Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP
 
Patent Law Review - IP Year in Review CLE v2
Patent Law Review - IP Year in Review CLE v2Patent Law Review - IP Year in Review CLE v2
Patent Law Review - IP Year in Review CLE v2
Bryan Beel
 
Mastering E-Discovery Presentation (partial)
Mastering E-Discovery Presentation (partial)Mastering E-Discovery Presentation (partial)
Mastering E-Discovery Presentation (partial)
Brendan Kenny
 
What Can Be Done Ip Litigation Prall
What Can Be Done Ip Litigation PrallWhat Can Be Done Ip Litigation Prall
What Can Be Done Ip Litigation Prall
CardinaleWay Mazda
 
Ediscovery model order
Ediscovery model orderEdiscovery model order
Ediscovery model order
Seth Row
 
Proportionality in Ediscovery
Proportionality in EdiscoveryProportionality in Ediscovery
Proportionality in Ediscovery
Josh Kubicki
 

Recommended

EDiscovery Presentation
EDiscovery PresentationEDiscovery Presentation
EDiscovery Presentation
scubastog
 
Software patents
Software patents Software patents
Software patents
Andres Guadamuz
 
Seventh Circuit Ediscovery Pilot Program
Seventh Circuit Ediscovery Pilot ProgramSeventh Circuit Ediscovery Pilot Program
Seventh Circuit Ediscovery Pilot Program
Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP
 
Patent Law Review - IP Year in Review CLE v2
Patent Law Review - IP Year in Review CLE v2Patent Law Review - IP Year in Review CLE v2
Patent Law Review - IP Year in Review CLE v2
Bryan Beel
 
Mastering E-Discovery Presentation (partial)
Mastering E-Discovery Presentation (partial)Mastering E-Discovery Presentation (partial)
Mastering E-Discovery Presentation (partial)
Brendan Kenny
 
What Can Be Done Ip Litigation Prall
What Can Be Done Ip Litigation PrallWhat Can Be Done Ip Litigation Prall
What Can Be Done Ip Litigation Prall
CardinaleWay Mazda
 
Ediscovery model order
Ediscovery model orderEdiscovery model order
Ediscovery model order
Seth Row
 
Proportionality in Ediscovery
Proportionality in EdiscoveryProportionality in Ediscovery
Proportionality in Ediscovery
Josh Kubicki
 
Berkeley Center for Law and Technology Patent Damages Panel
Berkeley Center for Law and Technology Patent Damages PanelBerkeley Center for Law and Technology Patent Damages Panel
Berkeley Center for Law and Technology Patent Damages Panel
Yar Chaikovsky
 
June's ARTICLES
June's ARTICLESJune's ARTICLES
June's ARTICLES
Junghye June Yeum (염정혜)
 
Recent Developments in Proving Damages in Intellectual Property Disputes
Recent Developments in Proving Damages in Intellectual Property DisputesRecent Developments in Proving Damages in Intellectual Property Disputes
Recent Developments in Proving Damages in Intellectual Property Disputes
Parsons Behle & Latimer
 
Analysis Of Emvr Ravi Mohan
Analysis Of Emvr Ravi MohanAnalysis Of Emvr Ravi Mohan
Analysis Of Emvr Ravi Mohan
ravimohan2
 
Business Method Patents
Business Method PatentsBusiness Method Patents
Business Method Patents
Sudipta De Sarkar
 
Patent Damages In A Post-25% World
Patent Damages In A Post-25% WorldPatent Damages In A Post-25% World
Patent Damages In A Post-25% World
Robear719
 
US Patent Litigation CSIRO v. Cisco - Judge Davis's Damages Calculation of Re...
US Patent Litigation CSIRO v. Cisco - Judge Davis's Damages Calculation of Re...US Patent Litigation CSIRO v. Cisco - Judge Davis's Damages Calculation of Re...
US Patent Litigation CSIRO v. Cisco - Judge Davis's Damages Calculation of Re...
Rahul Dev
 
Prosecution Luncheon November 2012
Prosecution Luncheon November 2012Prosecution Luncheon November 2012
Prosecution Luncheon November 2012
Woodard, Emhardt, Henry, Reeves & Wagner, LLP
 
Conjoint survey paper
Conjoint survey paperConjoint survey paper
Conjoint survey paper
JaeWon Lee
 
IP-301 POST-GRANT REVIEW TRIALS 2022 - PGRT Basics
IP-301 POST-GRANT REVIEW TRIALS 2022 - PGRT Basics IP-301 POST-GRANT REVIEW TRIALS 2022 - PGRT Basics
IP-301 POST-GRANT REVIEW TRIALS 2022 - PGRT Basics
Financial Poise
 
Gober Rivette_published in Intellectual Asset Magazine Issue 75_December 2015
Gober Rivette_published in Intellectual Asset Magazine Issue 75_December 2015Gober Rivette_published in Intellectual Asset Magazine Issue 75_December 2015
Gober Rivette_published in Intellectual Asset Magazine Issue 75_December 2015
Mark Gober
 
Is there more damage than remedy in reforming patent law
Is there more damage than remedy in reforming patent lawIs there more damage than remedy in reforming patent law
Is there more damage than remedy in reforming patent law
Kathleen Broughton
 
FOR PUBLICATIONUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE NIN.docx
FOR PUBLICATIONUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE NIN.docxFOR PUBLICATIONUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE NIN.docx
FOR PUBLICATIONUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE NIN.docx
budbarber38650
 
Why business method patents cannot be too quickly dismissed
Why business method patents cannot be too quickly dismissedWhy business method patents cannot be too quickly dismissed
Why business method patents cannot be too quickly dismissed
Moses Muchiri
 
The microsoft anti trust case
The microsoft anti trust caseThe microsoft anti trust case
The microsoft anti trust case
Rahul Soni
 
In-House Counsel's Role in Avoiding Willful Patent Infringement
In-House Counsel's Role in Avoiding Willful Patent InfringementIn-House Counsel's Role in Avoiding Willful Patent Infringement
In-House Counsel's Role in Avoiding Willful Patent Infringement
Tim Hsieh
 
Patents That Cannot Be Infringed
Patents That Cannot Be InfringedPatents That Cannot Be Infringed
Patents That Cannot Be Infringed
blewisbell
 
PGRT Basics (Series: IP 301 Post-Grant Review Trials 2020)
PGRT Basics (Series: IP 301 Post-Grant Review Trials 2020)PGRT Basics (Series: IP 301 Post-Grant Review Trials 2020)
PGRT Basics (Series: IP 301 Post-Grant Review Trials 2020)
Financial Poise
 
120208-NYLJ-Kass-and-Reese[2]
120208-NYLJ-Kass-and-Reese[2]120208-NYLJ-Kass-and-Reese[2]
120208-NYLJ-Kass-and-Reese[2]
Lawrence Kass
 
Federal Circuit Review | July 2013
Federal Circuit Review | July 2013Federal Circuit Review | July 2013
Federal Circuit Review | July 2013
Knobbe Martens - Intellectual Property Law
 
2017 08-patent prosecution lunch
2017 08-patent prosecution lunch2017 08-patent prosecution lunch
2017 08-patent prosecution lunch
Woodard, Emhardt, Henry, Reeves & Wagner, LLP
 
Recent Developments in US Trademark Law
Recent Developments in US Trademark LawRecent Developments in US Trademark Law
Recent Developments in US Trademark Law
Woodard, Emhardt, Henry, Reeves & Wagner, LLP
 

More Related Content

Similar to How to Prove Reasonable Royalty Damages after Uniloc

Recent Developments in Proving Damages in Intellectual Property Disputes
Recent Developments in Proving Damages in Intellectual Property DisputesRecent Developments in Proving Damages in Intellectual Property Disputes
Recent Developments in Proving Damages in Intellectual Property Disputes
Parsons Behle & Latimer
 
Analysis Of Emvr Ravi Mohan
Analysis Of Emvr Ravi MohanAnalysis Of Emvr Ravi Mohan
Analysis Of Emvr Ravi Mohan
ravimohan2
 
US Patent Litigation CSIRO v. Cisco - Judge Davis's Damages Calculation of Re...
US Patent Litigation CSIRO v. Cisco - Judge Davis's Damages Calculation of Re...US Patent Litigation CSIRO v. Cisco - Judge Davis's Damages Calculation of Re...
US Patent Litigation CSIRO v. Cisco - Judge Davis's Damages Calculation of Re...
Rahul Dev
 
Conjoint survey paper
Conjoint survey paperConjoint survey paper
Conjoint survey paper
JaeWon Lee
 
Gober Rivette_published in Intellectual Asset Magazine Issue 75_December 2015
Gober Rivette_published in Intellectual Asset Magazine Issue 75_December 2015Gober Rivette_published in Intellectual Asset Magazine Issue 75_December 2015
Gober Rivette_published in Intellectual Asset Magazine Issue 75_December 2015
Mark Gober
 
FOR PUBLICATIONUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE NIN.docx
FOR PUBLICATIONUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE NIN.docxFOR PUBLICATIONUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE NIN.docx
FOR PUBLICATIONUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE NIN.docx
budbarber38650
 
The microsoft anti trust case
The microsoft anti trust caseThe microsoft anti trust case
The microsoft anti trust case
Rahul Soni
 
In-House Counsel's Role in Avoiding Willful Patent Infringement
In-House Counsel's Role in Avoiding Willful Patent InfringementIn-House Counsel's Role in Avoiding Willful Patent Infringement
In-House Counsel's Role in Avoiding Willful Patent Infringement
Tim Hsieh
 
120208-NYLJ-Kass-and-Reese[2]
120208-NYLJ-Kass-and-Reese[2]120208-NYLJ-Kass-and-Reese[2]
120208-NYLJ-Kass-and-Reese[2]
Lawrence Kass
 

Similar to How to Prove Reasonable Royalty Damages after Uniloc (20)

Berkeley Center for Law and Technology Patent Damages Panel
Berkeley Center for Law and Technology Patent Damages PanelBerkeley Center for Law and Technology Patent Damages Panel
Berkeley Center for Law and Technology Patent Damages Panel
 
June's ARTICLES
June's ARTICLESJune's ARTICLES
June's ARTICLES
 
Recent Developments in Proving Damages in Intellectual Property Disputes
Recent Developments in Proving Damages in Intellectual Property DisputesRecent Developments in Proving Damages in Intellectual Property Disputes
Recent Developments in Proving Damages in Intellectual Property Disputes
 
Analysis Of Emvr Ravi Mohan
Analysis Of Emvr Ravi MohanAnalysis Of Emvr Ravi Mohan
Analysis Of Emvr Ravi Mohan
 
Business Method Patents
Business Method PatentsBusiness Method Patents
Business Method Patents
 
Patent Damages In A Post-25% World
Patent Damages In A Post-25% WorldPatent Damages In A Post-25% World
Patent Damages In A Post-25% World
 
US Patent Litigation CSIRO v. Cisco - Judge Davis's Damages Calculation of Re...
US Patent Litigation CSIRO v. Cisco - Judge Davis's Damages Calculation of Re...US Patent Litigation CSIRO v. Cisco - Judge Davis's Damages Calculation of Re...
US Patent Litigation CSIRO v. Cisco - Judge Davis's Damages Calculation of Re...
 
Prosecution Luncheon November 2012
Prosecution Luncheon November 2012Prosecution Luncheon November 2012
Prosecution Luncheon November 2012
 
Conjoint survey paper
Conjoint survey paperConjoint survey paper
Conjoint survey paper
 
IP-301 POST-GRANT REVIEW TRIALS 2022 - PGRT Basics
IP-301 POST-GRANT REVIEW TRIALS 2022 - PGRT Basics IP-301 POST-GRANT REVIEW TRIALS 2022 - PGRT Basics
IP-301 POST-GRANT REVIEW TRIALS 2022 - PGRT Basics
 
Gober Rivette_published in Intellectual Asset Magazine Issue 75_December 2015
Gober Rivette_published in Intellectual Asset Magazine Issue 75_December 2015Gober Rivette_published in Intellectual Asset Magazine Issue 75_December 2015
Gober Rivette_published in Intellectual Asset Magazine Issue 75_December 2015
 
Is there more damage than remedy in reforming patent law
Is there more damage than remedy in reforming patent lawIs there more damage than remedy in reforming patent law
Is there more damage than remedy in reforming patent law
 
FOR PUBLICATIONUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE NIN.docx
FOR PUBLICATIONUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE NIN.docxFOR PUBLICATIONUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE NIN.docx
FOR PUBLICATIONUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE NIN.docx
 
Why business method patents cannot be too quickly dismissed
Why business method patents cannot be too quickly dismissedWhy business method patents cannot be too quickly dismissed
Why business method patents cannot be too quickly dismissed
 
The microsoft anti trust case
The microsoft anti trust caseThe microsoft anti trust case
The microsoft anti trust case
 
In-House Counsel's Role in Avoiding Willful Patent Infringement
In-House Counsel's Role in Avoiding Willful Patent InfringementIn-House Counsel's Role in Avoiding Willful Patent Infringement
In-House Counsel's Role in Avoiding Willful Patent Infringement
 
Patents That Cannot Be Infringed
Patents That Cannot Be InfringedPatents That Cannot Be Infringed
Patents That Cannot Be Infringed
 
PGRT Basics (Series: IP 301 Post-Grant Review Trials 2020)
PGRT Basics (Series: IP 301 Post-Grant Review Trials 2020)PGRT Basics (Series: IP 301 Post-Grant Review Trials 2020)
PGRT Basics (Series: IP 301 Post-Grant Review Trials 2020)
 
120208-NYLJ-Kass-and-Reese[2]
120208-NYLJ-Kass-and-Reese[2]120208-NYLJ-Kass-and-Reese[2]
120208-NYLJ-Kass-and-Reese[2]
 
Federal Circuit Review | July 2013
Federal Circuit Review | July 2013Federal Circuit Review | July 2013
Federal Circuit Review | July 2013
 

More from Woodard, Emhardt, Henry, Reeves & Wagner, LLP

Recent Developments in US Trademark Law
Recent Developments in US Trademark LawRecent Developments in US Trademark Law
Recent Developments in US Trademark Law
Woodard, Emhardt, Henry, Reeves & Wagner, LLP
 

More from Woodard, Emhardt, Henry, Reeves & Wagner, LLP (20)

2017 08-patent prosecution lunch
2017 08-patent prosecution lunch2017 08-patent prosecution lunch
2017 08-patent prosecution lunch
 
Recent Developments in US Trademark Law
Recent Developments in US Trademark LawRecent Developments in US Trademark Law
Recent Developments in US Trademark Law
 
2017 March Patent Prosecution Lunch
2017 March Patent Prosecution Lunch2017 March Patent Prosecution Lunch
2017 March Patent Prosecution Lunch
 
February 2017 Patent Prosecution Lunch
February 2017 Patent Prosecution LunchFebruary 2017 Patent Prosecution Lunch
February 2017 Patent Prosecution Lunch
 
Alice Corp Update 2016 Cases
Alice Corp Update 2016 CasesAlice Corp Update 2016 Cases
Alice Corp Update 2016 Cases
 
2017 January Patent Prosecution Lunch
2017 January Patent Prosecution Lunch2017 January Patent Prosecution Lunch
2017 January Patent Prosecution Lunch
 
2016 September Patent Prosecution Lunch
2016 September Patent Prosecution Lunch2016 September Patent Prosecution Lunch
2016 September Patent Prosecution Lunch
 
2016 August Patent Prosecution Lunch
2016 August Patent Prosecution Lunch2016 August Patent Prosecution Lunch
2016 August Patent Prosecution Lunch
 
Review of Recent IP Supreme Court Cases
Review of Recent IP Supreme Court CasesReview of Recent IP Supreme Court Cases
Review of Recent IP Supreme Court Cases
 
Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016
Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016
Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016
 
July 2016 Trademark Prosecution Lunch Update
July 2016 Trademark Prosecution Lunch UpdateJuly 2016 Trademark Prosecution Lunch Update
July 2016 Trademark Prosecution Lunch Update
 
2016 07-Patent Prosecution Lunch
2016 07-Patent Prosecution Lunch2016 07-Patent Prosecution Lunch
2016 07-Patent Prosecution Lunch
 
Federal Rules Update
Federal Rules UpdateFederal Rules Update
Federal Rules Update
 
January 2016 Trademark Prosecution Lunch
January 2016 Trademark Prosecution LunchJanuary 2016 Trademark Prosecution Lunch
January 2016 Trademark Prosecution Lunch
 
In re tam presentation
In re tam presentationIn re tam presentation
In re tam presentation
 
January 2016 Patent Prosecution Lunch
January 2016 Patent Prosecution LunchJanuary 2016 Patent Prosecution Lunch
January 2016 Patent Prosecution Lunch
 
International Copyright Protection Primer
International Copyright Protection PrimerInternational Copyright Protection Primer
International Copyright Protection Primer
 
2015 October Patent Prosecution Lunch
2015 October Patent Prosecution Lunch 2015 October Patent Prosecution Lunch
2015 October Patent Prosecution Lunch
 
CLE - Introduction to IP Law
CLE - Introduction to IP LawCLE - Introduction to IP Law
CLE - Introduction to IP Law
 
August 2015 Patent Prosecution Lunch
August 2015 Patent Prosecution LunchAugust 2015 Patent Prosecution Lunch
August 2015 Patent Prosecution Lunch
 

How to Prove Reasonable Royalty Damages after Uniloc

  • 1. How to Prove Reasonable Royalty Damages after Uniloc March 3, 2011
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14.
  • 15.
  • 16.
  • 17.
  • 18.
  • 19.