Koen Van VlaenderenHi Tyler, would you like to do a similar assessment of Tesla's longitudinal electric wave technology? I worked on this subject for many years now (I am an electrical engineer, university degree), see my website www.no.nl/tesla . I found plenty of scientific evidence for Tesla's claims, please respond to koenvanvla@gmail.com3 months ago
Are you sure you want to
tylervan@robbierobertson9847. Please reread section #1. Let me know what specifically you believe to be inaccurate, I believe the facts are all clear, correct and verifiable. tyler6 months ago
Are you sure you want to
Robbie RobertsonYou are right about the 3 facts that must first be proven. Unfortunately to date the first has still to be proven. heaps of demonstrations but to my knowledge every one has proved wanting and none have been able to be replicated. I know it is a wonderful dream and in the fullness of time I hope it becomes a reality but no amount of wishful thinking and wanting will make this real. The proof is easy for anyone that has a true working model. To date no one has been able to prove a working model. we all live in hope. But that is all it is so far.......HOPE8 months ago
Are you sure you want to
Jan JutanderVery nice work, Tyler! Best regards/Jan8 months ago
Are you sure you want to
Lorenz HinterauerGreat work, with little doubt mentioned above. One way into a bright future - to follow, with best regards from Austria.8 months ago
Are you sure you want to
Livio181052Version 1.6? He had no time? I have to question his intellectual honesty? Although the following is incorrect: 21. FACT 2C. NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS IS THE LEADING LARGE COMPANY PUBLICLY WORKING ON LENR; SIEMENS MAY BE ACTIVE AS WELL – Donating equipment for LENR research to universities, including the University of Bologna http://fusionefredda.wordpress.com/2012/06/25/arata2/#comment-9015 Gherardo Gentzen (alias Alessio Guglielmi, Università di Bath) scrive: luglio 5, 2012 alle 4:25 pm A proposito di National Instruments e di UniBO, ricevo dal Dipartimento di Fisica di UniBO e pubblico senza alterare, con il parere favorevole del direttore Capiluppi: E’ stato fatto un ordine abbastanza rilevante, almeno per noi, per aggiornare i laboratori didattici alla National. A parte lo sconto educational, in seguito all’ordine la National ha regalato un po’ di materiale al dip. senza nessuna condizione di impiego i.e. non per la didattica, non per la fusione fredda, non per nient’altro. Il materiale “omaggio” e’ finito distribuito tra i vari laboratori di ricerca. Il fatto che ci sia materiale National nuovo in dip. di fisica a Bologna non ha quindi niente a che vedere con la fusione fredda qualunque cosa ne pensino alla National. Best Regards Livio Varalta9 months ago
Are you sure you want to
Livio181052Dear Tyler, thanks for Version 1.5 In my opinion, is appropriate to further clarify: Slide 19 Points 7. and 10. , According to press releases UniBO, should be improved: 7. Professors UniBo were present only as observers: http://www.magazine.unibo.it/Magazine/Universita/2012/01/26/E-cat_dichiarazione_del_Dipartimento_di_Fisica.htm 10. No supposed, in Rossi, by UniBo, but only availability to calorimetric measurements http://www.magazine.unibo.it/Magazine/Universita/2012/01/26/E-cat_dichiarazione_del_Dipartimento_di_Fisica.htm In the confident expectation of Version 1.6 thanks sincerely Livio Varalta9 months ago
Are you sure you want to
Livio181052Dear Tyler, The University of Bologna? You know ... When will version 1.5?9 months ago
Are you sure you want to
俊郎 浅学俊郎Dear Tyler, I guess the photo of 'E-Cat home' on the 1st page shows a mock-up image. I think photo of real machine is better. For example: http://www.freeenergytruth.com/2011/04/rossi-energy-catalyzer-threatens-entire.html9 months ago
Is Commercial LENR the Real Deal?Presentation Transcript
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com)IS COMMERCIAL LOW ENERGY NUCLEARREACTION (LENR) THE REAL DEAL?Analysis by Tyler van HouwelingenOriginally presented August 17, 2012, @ ICCF-17 in Daejeon S. KoreaUpdated: May 24, 2013Version 4.6Defkalion Hyperion Leonardo Corp “HotCat”/1MW E-CAT1Brillouin BoilerNOTE: You may reprint any content within this presentation if you include a link to LENRProof.com
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com)THERE ARE 3 FACTS YOU MUST ANALYZE IN ORDER TOBELIEVE THAT LENR IS AN IMMEDIATE AND TOTALGAME CHANGER IN ENERGY:Fact 1. LENR is a real,proven energy creatingreaction?Fact 3. Scaled/controlledLENR is far superior to allexisting forms of energygeneration?Fact 2. LENR has beenscaled and controlled tocommercial powergenerating levels?? ? ?Tyler’sConfidenceLevel2
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com)INTRODUCTION – WHAT IS LENR?• Low Energy Nuclear Reaction (LENR) is a new, 3rd type of nuclear reaction (along withfission and fusion) that was originally discovered in 1989 by scientists Fleischmann &Pons and called “cold fusion”. LENR is similar to, but believed to be different than coldfusion, although that may remain the common name. (LENR has also been calledLANR, Fleischmann/Pons Effect, Anomalous Heat Effect, Quantum Fusion, CECR, LENT.)• LENR appears to be far stronger than any known chemical reaction and up to20,000,000 times the power density of today’s combustion energy processes. The LENRprocess can continually create large amounts of excess heat in a small sized reactor forseveral months using small amounts of low cost fuel and producing no harmful CO2 ornuclear byproducts beyond that of a microwave oven.• LENR replications have been increasing in sustained power gain since the originalexperiments in 1989 which used Palladium and Deuterium electrolysis. Newer LENRsystems use processed Nickel and Hydrogen gas to achieve higher power gains, whichappear to now be approaching commercial heat/electrical power generating levels.• Commercial LENR energy generation, when it arrives, may be a near perfect energysource that will have profound changes globally.3
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com)FACT 1 EVIDENCE: LENR IS A REAL ENERGYCREATING MECHANISM (?)A. Long and rapidly growing list of credible people and organizations worldwideaffirming LENR is real, with strong affirmation recently from NASA, US Navy,US Department of Defense, National Instruments, European Directorate-General as well as leading scientists and professors at respected Universitiesworldwide.B. Some 1700 peer reviewed LENR articles & hundreds of reported replicationsof LENR worldwide since the discovery in 1989.C. Ongoing and recently completed LENR public demos at MIT, NIWeek (Austin,Tx), ICCF-17 (Korea) and multiple demos in Italy.4FACT 1.
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com)GROWING LIST OF CREDIBLE PEOPLE AND ORGANIZATIONSWORLDWIDE AFFIRMING WITH FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE THATLENR IS REAL AND PRODUCES A NET ENERGY GAIN (1 of 2)• Brian Josephson, Nobel Prize Theoretical physics,Cambridge• Julian Schwinger, Nobel Prize Physics, Berkeley,Purdue, deceased• Dennis Bushnell, NASA chief scientist, LangleyResearch Center, LRC• Dr. Joseph Zawodny, NASA senior research scientistLangley Research Center• Dr. Michael A Nelson, NASA LENR SpaceApplications Lead• Gustave C. Fralick, Arthur J. Decker, and James W.Blue, NASA Lewis Research• George Miley, University of Illinois, Department ofNuclear, Plasma, and Radiological Engineering• Dr. Mike McKubre, SRI (Stanford ResearchInstitute), Director Energy Research Center,University of Missouri• Dr. Francis Tanzella, SRI, PhD chemistry, seniorelectrochemist• Dr. Brian Ahern , Ames National Laboratory• Edmund Storms, Los Alamos National LaboratoryFACT 1A.5• Prof. Peter Hagelstein, Electrical Engineering, MIT• Dr. Mace, Los Alamos National Laboratory• John Bockrus, electrochemist Texas A&M University• Dr. Francesco Piantelli, University of Siena,Considered the father of modern LENR, filedoriginal patents in 1995 for Ni/H based LENR• Dr. Sergio Focardi, emeritus professor University ofBologna• Dr. Giuseppe Levi , University of Bologna• Dr. David Bianchini, University of Bologna• Dr. Christos Stremmenos, University of Bologna,Dept of. Physical and Inorganic Chemistry, retired• Francesco Celani, National Institute of NuclearPhysics (Italy’s equivalent of Los Alamos)• Dr. Frank Gordon, US Navy’s Space and Navalwarfare systems (SPAWAR), retired• Julian Schwinger, Nobel Laureate deceased• Eugene Mallove, Professor of science MIT,deceased• Dr. Mastromatteo, STMicroelectronics• Dr. James Truchard, National Instruments founder,President and CEO
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com)FACT 1A.• Martin Fleischmann, deceased & Stanley Pons,University of Utah & Southampton, considered thefathers of LENR/Cold Fusion• Akito Takahashi, Osaka University, retired professor• Professor Yoshiaki Arata, Osaka University• Physicist Yasuhiro Iwamura, Mitsubishi HeavyIndustries• State Senator, Bruce Tarr, Massachusetts• Allan Widom, prof. Northeastern University• Lewis Larson, CEO Lattice Energy, LLC• Pirelli High School, Italy• US Dept of Defense advanced research (DARPA)• Professor Violante, ENEA• Dr. Vladimir Vysotskii, Kiev National University, Headof physics department• Dr. Iraj Parchamazad, Chairman of the ChemistryUniversity of LaVerne• Dr. T. W. Grimshaw, Energy Institute, Univ of Texas• Professor Michael Melich, US Navy• Sidney Kimmel, Billionaire philanthropist donated$5.5m to U of Missouri to study LENR in 2/126• Dr. Sven Kullander, chairman of the Royal SwedishAcademy of Sciences Energy Committee, Professoremeritus High Energy Physics Uppsala University,• Rob Duncan, University of Missouri, Chancellor ofresearch,• John Gahl, University of Missouri, Director MaterialScience Engineering.• Mark Prelas, U of Missouri, prof Nuclear Science• Dr. Yeong E. Kim, professor physics Purdue University• Prof. Koltick, Purdue University• Prof. Reifenberger, Purdue University• Richard Oriani, Professor Emeritus, Univ of Minnesota• Tyler van Houwelingen, MBA/EE, Univ of Michigan• Hanno Essén, theoretical physicist Swedish RoyalInstitute of Technology, former chairman SwedishSkeptics Society• David J. Nagel, Professor of Engineering & Appliedscience George Washington University• Dr. Andres, Purdue University• Dr. L. Magro, ISPRA, the Institute for Protection andEnvironmental ResearchGROWING LIST OF CREDIBLE PEOPLE AND ORGANIZATIONSWORLDWIDE AFFIRMING WITH FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE THATLENR IS REAL AND PRODUCES A NET ENERGY GAIN (2 of 2)
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com)EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FORRESEARCH & INNOVATION PROVIDED STRONGCONFIRMATION OF LENR IN JULY 2012• In a July 2012 report “Low energy reactions in condensed matter” LINK– “ENEA, SRI and NRL have been involved within review programs in the US and inItaly. The main task was to demonstrate… the existence of the excess heatproduction. The target was achieved and the existence of the effect is nolonger in doubt.“• Recommendations to the Commission– “Include LENR in FP7 calls as research on materials as it has unlimited andsustainable future energy technology potential.”– “Support the study… to achieve the control of the technology.”– “Focus on the fundamental research because of the synergy with otherdisciplines.”FACT 1A.7“THE EXISTENCE OF THE EFFECT IS NO LONGER IN DOUBT... [LENR] HAS UNLIMITED &SUSTAINABLE FUTURE ENERGY TECHNOLOGY POTENTIAL.” July 2012
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com)NASA HAS SHOWN STRONG, GROWING SUPPORT FOR LENR• In Feb, 2013, NASA posted more LENR support, “The Nuclear rector in your Basement”, LINK• In May 2012 NASA posted LENR support on its website and revealed that they have been using publicfunds to study LENR for the past 3 years. LINK• During 2011/12, NASA hired Boeing to develop an advanced, green subsonic airplane using LENR and3 other clean energy technologies. Boeing provided the plans to NASA in May 2012. LINK• NASA filed two LENR related patents in fall 2011. U.S. Patent # 2011/0255645.• Multiple persons within NASA are affirming LENR is real in 2011/2012.– Dennis Bushnell, chief scientist at NASA LRC, 5/23/12. “We now have over two decades ofhundreds of experiments worldwide indicating heat and transmutations withminimal radiation and low energy input… So, is LENR "Real?" Evidently, from thenow long standing and diverse experimental evidence” LINK– Bushnell goes on to say “There are estimates using just the performance of some of the devicesunder study that 1% of the nickel mined on the planet each year could produce the world’senergy requirements at the order of 25% the cost of coal.”– Joseph M. Zawadny Low Energy Nuclear Reactions Is there a better way to do nuclear power?• On 9/22/11, NASA GRC held an LENR workshop with NASA LENR researchers presenting:– Dr. Michael A. Nelson, NASA-MFC LENR Space Applications Lead,Overview of Low Energy Nuclear Reactions as Implemented by Andrea Rossi andFrancesco Piantelli.– Gustave C. Fralick, John D. Wrbanek, Susan Y. Wrbanek, Janis Niedra from NASA LENR at GRC.– Dennis M. Bushnell Chief Scientist NASA Langley Research Center, ”NASA and LENR Presentation”FACT 1A.8
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com)US NAVY/SPAWAR HAS BEEN ONE OF THE LEADERS INLENR RESEARCH. SPAWAR HAS VALIDATED LENR IN PUBLICSTATEMENTS AND DECLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS• On April 17, 2013 the US Navy filed for an LENR patent. LINK• US Navy’s SPAWAR division has published some 30 peer reviewed papers on LENR. LINK• SPAWAR acknowledged researching LENR for the past 20 yr and confirmed LENR is real:– A recently declassified November 2009 SPAWAR/NAVY report, “Thermal and nuclearaspects of the Pd/D20 system: A decade of research at Navy Laboratories” LINK• “…We do know the existence of Cold Fusion phenomenon throughrepeated observations by scientists throughout the world... It is time forgovernment funding organizations to invest in this research.”, Dr. Frank E.Gordon, Head Navigation/Applied Sciences SPAWAR, San Diego.• S. Szpak, P. A. Mosier–Boss and Dr. M. Ashraf Imam of SPAWARcontributed/edited– A SPAWAR presentation at University of Missouri in May 2009 called, “Twenty YearHistory of LENR – Hiding in Plain Sight” LINK• One of Rossi’s listed advisors/BOD is Professor Michael Melich, who is currently a facultymember of the US Navy Post Graduate School.• Paul Swanson of the U.S. Navy’s SPAWAR attended Rossi’s demo in fall 2011; Note thatFACT 1A.9
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com)OTHER COMPELLING SUPPORT FOR LENR• “No doubt anomalous excess heat is produced in these experiments"– DARPA, 2009 reported on 60 Minutes, “Cold Fusion is Hot Again”• “An independent research thesis at the University of Texas at Austin found that from1989 to 2010 more than 180 experiments around the world reported anomalous highproduction of excess heat in Pd/D or Ni/H.”– National Instruments, July 2012• “Very careful work at two national laboratories, namely the Naval ResearchLaboratory in the United States, and at ENEA, the National Energy Laboratory of Italy,and at many other laboratories around the world, clearly indicate that these extreme‘excess’ heat releases are in fact real, despite earlier claims to the contrary”– Robert Duncan, Vice-Chancellor for Research, University of Missouri, 2012• “I believe in analysis of new sources of energy. I believe in laboratories, looking atways to conduct electricity with cold fusion” VIDEO– Mitt Romney, December 2011, Washington Examiner.FACT 1A.MORE SUPPORT 10
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com)FACT 1B.11SOME 1700 PEER REVIEWED LENR ARTICLES &THOUSANDS OF REPORTED REPLICATIONS OF LENRWORLDWIDE SINCE THE DISCOVERY IN 1989PLEASE SEE:www.lenr-canr.org(Credit to Jed Rothwell)
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com)Rossi/Leonardo’s claimed 1MW Industrial E-CAT LINKClaimed to be the worlds first commercial LENR device,Claimed up to 500kW (thermal) demonstrated to largegroup for 3 hours. Photo: October 2011RECENT PUBLIC DEMONSTRATIONS OF LENR REACTORSFACT 1C.DemosLENR DeviceJanuary 2011,April 2011,October 2011,Bologna, ItalyMIT’s NANOR LENR reactor, LINK, LINK, LINKMitchell Schwartz of JET Energy operated the demo,supervised by Dr. Peter Hagelstein, professor at MIT.Demo visited by US State Senator Bruce Tarr & othersClaimed mW power output, COP 10-1422Passi’s “Athanor” and “Hydrotron” LENR ReactorsPhoto: Ugo Abundo, June, August 2012 VIDEOTest and all setup detail to be released shortlyJan-June 2012MIT, Boston USAJune, July 2012Rome, Italy12Celani’s Ni/H LENR reactors LINK LINKAll control and measuring equipment provided by NI10-22W excess heat for 75+ hours, max 160C tempPhotos: Dennis Letts, 8/6/12, Tyler van H., 8/15/12August 2012NIWEEK, Austin, TXICCF -17, S. Korea
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com)PROFESSOR CELANI’S PORTABLE LENR DEMO - AUGUST 201212-22W OUTPUT POWER GAIN CONTINUOUSLY FOR 4 DAYS. PERFORMED ON TWOCONTINENTS BACK TO BACK; MEASUREMENTS PERFORMED BY NATIONAL INSTRUMENTSFACT 1C.• In August 2012, Prof. Celani, along with National Instruments Engineers, successfully demoed an NI+HLENR reactor at ICCF. The demo was placed in the middle of S. Korea High Tech. Center and was open topublic view. It was run from Tues morn 8/14 and was still running when I left late Fri 8/17 producing asteady 15-20W of excess power.• All monitoring /measurements were performed by a National Instruments onsite engineer, who suppliedall measuring equipment. The demo was also run successfully a week earlier at NIWeek in Austin, Texasin front of 2000 NI engineers with measurements performed by 3 NI provided engineers.• The Celani reactor was recently verified by STMicroelectronics (LINK) and is considered to be one of thebest, simplest, and most conclusive demos of LENR to date.• The non-profit group Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project is working with Prof Celani to openlydemonstrate and distribute the demos worldwide, please see www.quantumheat.orgVIDEO 13Prof Celani with NI engineerdemonstrating output gains.• NI monitoring systems• Live LENR Reactor close upProf Celani portable Ni/HLENR live demoProf. Celani and me infront of live LENR demo
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com) 14THERE ARE 3 FACTS YOU MUST ANALYZE IN ORDER TOBELIEVE THAT LENR IS AN IMMEDIATE AND TOTALGAME CHANGER IN ENERGY:Fact 1. LENR is a real,proven energy creatingreactionFact 3. Scaled/controlledLENR is far superior to allexisting forms of energygeneration?Fact 2. LENR has beenscaled and controlled tocommercial powergenerating levels?Tyler’sCertaintyLevel100% ? ?
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com)FACT 2 EVIDENCE: LENR HAS BEEN SCALED AND CONTROLLEDTO COMMERCIAL POWER GENERATING LEVELS (?)A. LENR has been maturing and scaling up in net energy creation and duration since 1989. Thishas accelerated with the introduction of Ni/H systems where power levels may have nowreached commercial power generation levels; this is referred to as LENR+.» 1989 Initially claiming 0.01-1W net power gain by Fleischmann/Pons (Pd/D)» 1993 Piantelli claiming 1-5W (Ni/H)» 2010 Celani claiming 10W (Ni/H)» 2012 Rossi/Defkalion claiming 1-10kW (Ni/H, these claims have not yet beenvalidated), Celani claiming 100WA. There are over a dozen companies that have been formed recently with the intent tocommercialize LENR. Six groups are claiming the ability to scale and control the reaction toat least 100W; three of the firms (Rossi, Defkalion & Brillouin) are claiming kW power gainsand have announced plans to launch commercial LENR energy products in 2012/13. Theyare also claiming to have reached higher temperatures sufficient for high efficiencyelectricity generation and direct replacement in electrical generating plants; however, theseclaims have to be fully validated.B. There is growing circumstantial evidence and an increasing number of credible personsaffirming that LENR+ has already been achieved today or will be achieved in the near term.FACT 2.15
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com)SUSTAINED POWER GAIN HAS BEEN SCALING SINCE 1989 AND KWLENR POWER LEVELS MAY BE IMMINENT IN THE NEAR TERM1995 2013Pd/DNi/H1989 2001 20070.1110100100010kSustainedWatts Gain+ Possible EM stimulationFACT 2A.16APPROXIMATES• LENR has beenincreasing in powerand kW may beimminent in the nearterm (0-5 yr)• Both Pd/D and NI/Hpaths are valuablefor further R&D; bothmay quickly increasein power once LENRis well understoodkW PowerAchievedCelani Ni/HPortable Demo2018Today ProjectedCurrent claims from 6 groups,including Celani & PiantelliCurrent claims from 3 groups,Rossi, DGT & Brillouin
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com)THE LEADING THEORIES EXPLAINING LENR FITWITHIN THE STANDARD MODEL OF PHYSICS• Bose-Einstein CondensationNuclear Fusion (BECNF)Theory(aka ELTB Method)• Widom-Larsen Theory• Hagelstein Theory• Bazhutov-Vereshkov Theory• Chubb (Scott) Theory• Chubb (Talbot) Theory• Fisher Theory• Gareev Theory• Hora-Miley Theory• Grand Unification Theory of CF• Kim-Zubarev Theory• Kirkinskii-Novikov Theory• Kozima TheoryLi Theory• Preparata Theory• Sinha-Meulenberg Theory• Storms Theory• Szpak Theory• Takahashi TheoryThere are several candidate theories for why LENR worksas it does, but no clear consensus winner yet.The best supported theories are fully compatible withthe Standard Model:•National Instruments is reportedly supporting the (1) Bose-Einstein Condensation Nuclear Fusion Theory (BECNF, ELTBMethod) which suppresses the Coulomb barrier for fusion.•NASA has put its initial support behind (2) Widom-Larson or aderivation of it, which involves the weak nuclear force and BetaDecay and not fusion for LENR power generation. LINK•Others support the theory by (3) Peter Hagelstein of MITNot having a clearly accepted theory & understanding ofthe LENR process has likely delayed the ability to bettercontrol and scale the reaction. It has also limited morewidespread scientific acceptance.See Appendix for more detail on LENR Theories.LINKFACT 2A.Candidate Theories for LENR17
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com)THERE ARE OVER A DOZEN COMPANIES THAT HAVE BEEN FORMEDRECENTLY TO COMMERCIALIZE HIGHER POWER LENR; THERE ARECREDIBLE PEOPLE ASSOCIATED WITH MOST/ALL OF THESE FIRMS1. Leonardo Corp – Andrea Rossi, Miami, FL/Bologna, Italy. Leonardo Corp appears to be the leader in the nascent market ofhigher power LENR. The company has made many revolutionary claims, however, most of these claims have not yet beenfully validated by 3rdparties. 1MW industrial “E-CAT” claimed available now for industrial purchase with COP of 6, 10KWhome “E-CAT”, available projected 2013. Claims temps stable to 1200C with the new Hot E-Cat, which he claims produced3268kWh over 218hrs with COP > 10 and an energy density >163 MWh/kg, which has been validated by at least oneindependent tester LINK. Rossi claims to have 63 employees and that he worked with Siemens and previously NationalInstruments on the control system. Rossi claims he delivered his first low temp 1MW E-CAT to a military entity in Feb 2012and has sent a 10kW home E-CAT to UL labs for approval. In September 2012, Rossi received a Safety Inspection Certificatefor his 1MW E-CAT from SGS, a prominent European testing agency. LINK On May 20, 2013 an independent 3rdparty testingwas published validating Rossi’s claims LINK. www.ecat.com2. Brillouin Energy – Robert Godes, Berkely, California. Brillouin is also a leader with kW claimed today with their “BrillouinBoiler” LENR reactor, targetted available 2013. Brillouin is working closely with SRI (McKubre). In June 2012 received $2mseed money; in Sept 2012, Brillouin received a patent for their technology In China. In Sept 2012, it was reported thatBrillouin secured a “second stage” $20M conditional investment from Sunrise Securities of New York, NY (sunrisecorp.com);the condition being the successful retrofit an existing fossil fuel plant (5-10MW). www.brillouinenergy.com3. Defkalion Green Technologies – Greece/Canada. Claimed “Hyperion” LENR reactor claimed to be available 2013 10kW-1MW+, COP 6-18, . Defkalion is a former partner of Rossi. www.defkalion-energy.com4. Metalenergy/nicHenergy – Dr. Piantelli, Italy, claimed 10-100W today, 2013 kW (licensing only) www.nichenergy.com/5. Jet Energy – Schwartz – Massachusetts, USA, mW range ‘NANOR”, 10+ COP www.world.std.com/~mica/jet.html, LINK6. Energetics Technologies, Ltd – Israel/Univ. Missouri, Energetics LENR research has been rolled into the Sidney KimmelInstitute for Nuclear Renaissance, mw range LENR, focus on research. www.energeticstech.com7. Lenuco – George Miley, Illinois, claimed 100-300W today, commercial 3kW (home) 30kW (industrial) targeted for 2013/14.8. Lattice Energy, LLC – Widom/Larson, Illinois. www.lattice-energy.blogspot.com9. Nucat Energy, LLC – LENR Consulting. www.nucat-energy.com10.Kresenn Ltd. – Celani advisor, Italy, 2012 for the development and comm. of LENR applications. www.kresenn.com11.LENR-CARS – Applications of LENR energy to transportation vertical market. www.lenr-cars.com12.And to a lesser extent: Blacklight Power, New Jersey, claimed 3mW, potentially similar to LENR, recent 3rd party successfultests www.blacklightpower.com (test results)FACT 2B.18
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com)Rossi/Leonardo’s ECAT individual reactor, 1MWIndustrial E-CAT said to contain 106 individual E-CATsand be the worlds first commercial LENR device. Morerecent “Hot E-CAT” said to operate up to 1200CPhotos: October 2011, July 2012*Claimed output of 10kW reactor, 1MW plantDefkalion’s Hyperion LENR ReactorPhoto: Sterling Allen, April 2012*Claimed to output 1kW rangeCLAIMED HIGHER POWER LENR REACTORSFACT 2C.Demos/TestingLENR Device**July/Oct 2012October 2011April 2011January 2011Bologna, ItalyN/ABrillouin Boiler Phase 2 ReactorPhoto: Ruby Carat, July 2011*Claimed to output 100W-1kW rangeN/ACelani’s Ni/H LENR reactors LINK LINKPortable demo version produced 10-22W excess heat,with higher power gains in non-portable version*Photos: Dennis Letts, 8/6/12, Tyler van H., 8/15/12August 2012NIWEEK, Austin, TXICCF -17, S. Korea19* These claims have yet to be fully validated
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com)GROWING AMOUNT OF CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE FOR KW POWERSCALING & CONTROL, HOWEVER, NOT YET VALIDATED BY 3RDPARTY (1 of 3)• LENR is a real energy creating phenomenon and power scaling up to kW levels is projected/expected within the near future (0-8yrsapprox) given the current scaling and maturation of LENR. Researchers have scaled LENR from 0.01W sustained power in 1989 to 10W in1994, (1000x scaling) in 5 years; now Rossi (and 3 other groups) are claiming similar power increase, from 10W to 10kW (1000x scaling)over 15 years.• NASA recently hired Boeing to design an airplane that could use LENR as its energy source. NASA acknowledged using public funds forLENR research after attending Rossi and Defkalion demos in 2011. In May 2012, NASA acknowledged it was investigating the kW LENRclaims. After investigating Rossi in detail and attending his demos, a NASA report by Michael Nelson in Sept. 2011 concluded it is“Difficult to rule Rossi out”.• Dr. Sergio Focardi, emeritus professor University of Bologna and Dr. Giuseppe Levi, also of the University of Bologna are working closelywith Rossi for the past 4 years. Note they are working with Rossi on a personal basis and not on behalf of their University.• On May 20, 2013 an independent 3rdparty validation report performed by 7 credible scientists was published validating Rossi’s ecattechnology. “The results obtained indicate that energy was produced in decidedly higher quantities than what may be gained from anyconventional source. …the results obtained place both devices several orders of magnitude outside the bounds of the Ragone plot regionfor chemical sources. Even from the standpoint of a “blind” evaluation of volumetric energy density, if we consider the whole volume of thereactor core and the most conservative figures on energy production, we still get a value of (7.93 ± 0.8) 102 MJ/Liter that is one order ofmagnitude higher than any conventional source.” LINK• The May 20, 2013 testing was funded by ELFORSK AB, the Swedish energy R&D organization established by Swedish energy utilities andmanufacturers. The proclaimed , “The measurements show that the catalyst produces significantly more energy than can be explained byordinary chemical reactions. The results are very remarkable. What lies behind the extraordinary heat production can not be explainedtoday.” ELFORSK has indicated they will continue to invest in the e-cat technology. LINK, LINK• In July 2012, National Instruments publicly announced it is supplying software and control systems to the LENR industry. At NIWeek inAugust 2012, NI hosted an LENR (Celani) demo in front of a reported 3800 participants, including 2000 NI engineers with three NIengineers performing all measurements.• Rossi claims to now be working with Siemens. In Sept 2011, Siemens sold its investments in nuclear fission energy and is currently sellingall its solar assets. In July 2012 it was announced that Siemens is attempting to purchase an Italian firm, Ansaldo Energia, who engages inproducing and installing thermoelectric power plants for government, independent power producers & industrial clients in Italy. Ansaldostaff attended Rossis demo in 2011.FACT 2C.20
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com) 21• Two organizations other than Rossi/Leonardo (Defkalion, Brillouin) are also claiming high power operation andpending commercial products using Ni/H. NicHenergy also progressing.• In August 2012, Brillouin was granted a patent in China for its Brillouin Boiller.• In September 2012, Rossi received a Safety Inspection Certificate from SGS, a prominent European testing agency, onhis 1MW E-CAT. LINK• All but a couple people who attended Rossi public demos in 2011 of the 1MW plant have been convinced, and noneare claiming it is a fraud. The demos were attended as observers, in a personal capacity, Prof. Petterson Roland(Uppsala University), Prof. Campari Enrico (Univ. Bologna), Prof. Bonetti Ennio (Univ. Bologna), Prof. Levi Giuseppe(Univ. Bologna), Prof. Focardi Sergio (Univ. Bologna), Dr. Bianchini David (Safety Consultant), Prof. Clauzon Pierre(CNAM-CEA Paris), Eng. Swanson Paul D. (SPAWAR-US Navy), Prof. Stremmenos Christos (Univ. Atene), Prof. JobsonEdward (Univ. Goteborg), Eng. Vandevalle Koen (Belgio), Dr Enrico Billi (Fisico, Ricercatore, CINA)• Hanno Essén and Sven Kullander testing and affirmation report of E-CAT from Rossi Demo April 2011 LINK• Positive leaning investigative story about Rossi and the e-cat on Swedish Science TV December 17, 2012 LINK• Rossi had access to the pioneers and leading Ni/H LENR scientists from the Universities of Bologna & Sienna for years,including those who scaled the reactions to the highest power levels that have been properly validated at around22W (Piantelli, Celani, Focardi, Levi). Rossi/Leonardo has been granted a patent in Italy.• Rossi is reported to have been a wealthy from his former business success and has invested large sums of his ownmoney into his LENR endeavor. If Rossi is not telling the truth, the scope of the scam is so large that he will certainlygo to prison, there is no other end-game given the scale and public awareness. (This would likely be the largestenergy scam of all time)• In February 2012, University of Bologna publicly stated their availability to testing E-CAT, even after their first contractfrom 2011 was not executed and therefore cancelled in January 2012. In Aug 2012, the University of Bologna alsoannounced it had not yet performed tests directly on the E-CAT, but again offered their availability for future tests.GROWING AMOUNT OF CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE FOR KW POWERSCALING & CONTROL, HOWEVER, NOT YET VALIDATED BY 3RDPARTY (2 of 3)FACT 2C.
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com)• At least Four companies have recently purchasing E-CAT licensing rights from Rossi/Leonardo.– E-CAT Australia - Roger Green, announced June 2012 a license for Australia/Asia Market. E-CAT Australiaperformed onsite testing of the 1MW E-CAT in Feb 2012 using their own 3rdparty scientists, this was followed bya license purchase.– Prometeon Srl - Aldo Proia, announced July 2012 a license for Italian market. Recently held a conference in Italy– TransAltech AG - Adolf Schneider, announced July 2012 a license for Switzerland, Germany, Lichtenstein.– Hydrofusion, Ltd - Magnus Holm, announced in July 2012 a license for Northern Europe.• No public denials from Siemens, US Navy, NASA, DOD, UL Labs, and National Instruments even though Rossi haspublicly claimed several times to be working with them directly.• Snr. US Navy Michael Melich on Leonardo Board of Directors/Advisors; credible BOD for Defkalion.• Rossi claims he sold the first 1MW E-CAT in October 2011 to a US military entity, who he claims took delivery of anewly built 1MW plant in Feb/March 2012. Rossi has previously sold high technology energy related equipment tothe US military in 1994, who indicted in writing they were satisfied with the project and its fulfillment, the project didnot continue after the proof of concept.• Rossi has a history of entrepreneurship with two other reportedly successful energy tech startups, after one verypublic failed endeavor, Petroldragon. Many of Rossis actions over the past few years could be viewed (IMHO) tofollow the pattern of an inventor/entrepreneur who has a new technology product that he is trying to control, refine,certify, patent and commercialize while attempting to keep IP from competitors.• On Aug 30, 2012, President Obama issued an executive order, ”Instead of burning fuel in an on site boiler to producethermal energy & also purchasing electricity from the grid, a manufacturing facility can use a Combined Heat & Power(CHP) system to provide both types of energy in one efficient step. … Strongly encourage efforts to achieve anational goal of deploying 40 Gigawatts of new, cost effective industrial CHP in the US by the end of 2020.” LINK(Note: 40GW for comparison is approx the peak power consumption of all Great Britain)FACT 2C.22GROWING AMOUNT OF CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE FOR KW POWERSCALING & CONTROL, HOWEVER, NOT YET VALIDATED BY 3RDPARTY (3 of 3)
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com)• Sergio Focardi, Emeritus Professor, Univ. Bologna. Led the Italian National Institute for Nuclearphysics and the faculty of Mathematics, physical and natural science at the Univ. of Bologna. LINK,LINK• Hanno Essén, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, LINK, LINK• Giuseppe Levi, Professor Physics, Univ. Bologna, LINK, LINK• Fabio Penon, Masters Nuclear Engineering. LINK• Fulvio Fabiani, Masters Engineering. LINK• David Bianchini, M.Sc Physicist, Radiation Measurements Specialist. LINK, LINK• Mats Lewan, Swedish Tech journalist NyTeknik, LINK• Dr. Roland Pettersson, Professor Chemistry Uppsala University (retired), LINK• David Roberson, BSEE, Design partner for Microchip Technology, LINK• Bob Higgins, BSEE, Member technical staff Motorola Solutions, LINK• Christos Stremmenos, Greek Scientist, Founder of Defkalion, LINK• Torbjörn Hartman – Senior Research Engineer, Svedberg Laboratory, Uppsala University, LINK, LINK• Bo Höistad – Professor Physics and Astronomy, Nuclear Physics, Uppsala University, LINK, LINK• Lars Tegnér – Professor Engineering Sciences, Uppsala University, LINK, LINK• Evelyn Foschi – Product Develop, CEI X-ray, Bolgna, LINK, LINK• Aldo Proia, CEO of Prometeon – an E-cat licensee, LINKAnalysis by Tyler vanHouwelingen23FACT 2C.PEOPLE WHO HAVE VALIDATED ROSSI’S E-CATAND ARE PUBLICLY BACKING ROSSI’S CLAIMS
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com)• During 2012, NI has become very active publicly with LENR. This includes:– Introducing and marketing software and control systems for LENR research.– Announcing they are working directly with nearly all the LENR leaders across the globe– Hosting public discussions and a live demo of an LENR reactor in Austin, Texas Aug 2012, NI week. LINK– Donating equipment for LENR research to some leading technical universities.– NI CEO, Dr. James Truchard, has made public statements in support of LENR– NI has made public statements supporting LENR, “There is an unknown physical event and there is a need ofbetter measurements and control tools. NI is playing a role in accelerating innovation and discovery.”• In Feb 2012, Julia Betts, Corp. Communications & Investor Relations Manager for NI confirmed that therewas a collaboration with Rossi/Leonardo Corp but that it ended. It has been reported, but not confirmed,that Julia Betts referred to this article as an accurate description of the relationship between Rossi/Leonardoand NI. LINK• Since their collaboration with Rossi in 2011 on an engagement dealing with LENR, it is possible that based ontheir recent actions, NI accepts that LENR research and products are advancing and will produce profits forNI in the near future. (IMHO)• Rossi claims to be working with Siemens now, instead of NI, per the recommendation of his militarycustomer. In Sept 2011, Siemens sold its investments in fission energy and is currently selling ot all its solarassets at a projected loss of 250m Euros LINK, LINK. On Nov 23, 2012 Siemens agreed to purchase an Italianfirm, Ansaldo Energia, who engages in producing and installing thermoelectric generators and power plantsin Italy and internationally. Ansaldo’s high level spokesman Dr. Andrea Aparo was on NI Week’s LENRPhysics panel in August 2012 and persons from Ansaldo attended Rossis E-CAT demo in October 2011.There are several Siemens technical employees highly active on LENR discussion boards and Siemens hasbegun showing public support for LENR with LENR related postings on it’s sponsored websiteTheEnergyCollective.com LINKFACT 2C.24NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS APPEARS TO BE THE LARGEST COMPANYWORKING PUBLICLY ON LENR; SIEMENS MAY BE ACTIVE AS WELL
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com)Tyler’sCertaintyLevel25100% 33% by end 201366% by end 201595% by end 2017(Optimistic within 6-36 mos.)THERE ARE 3 FACTS YOU MUST ANALYZE IN ORDER TOBELIEVE THAT LENR IS AN IMMEDIATE AND TOTALGAME CHANGER IN ENERGY:Fact 1. LENR is a real,proven energy creatingreactionFact 3. Scaled/controlledLENR is far superior to allexisting forms of energygeneration?Fact 2. LENR has beenscaled and controlled tocommercial powergenerating levels??
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com)FACT 3 EVIDENCE: SCALED/CONTROLLED LENR IS FAR SUPERIORTO ALL EXISTING FORMS OF ENERGY GENERATION (?)A. Powerful – LENR reportedly has a very high energy density that is a factor 100k-10million timesgreater than today’s combustion processes (oil, coal, NG) and reportedly higher than today’scommercial fission. Some LENR devices are now claimed to be operating at 600-2000C, which wouldallow for direct replacement of nearly all existing power generation sources in plants globally.B. Green & Safe – LENR is believed to be 100% green, safe and carbon free. LENR is a nuclear reaction,however it does not require uranium/plutonium, has no CO2 or nuclear waste byproducts, operatesat relatively low temperatures and appears to have no harmful radiation effects or safety issues liketraditional fission based energy. An LENR reaction cannot run away and “melt down” given the lowertemperatures involved.C. Limitless – The current fuel for LENR, small amounts of nickel & hydrogen, is nearly limitless, usingone of the most abundant metals along with the most abundant elements that can be obtained fromwater. It has been by a NASA scientist that 1% of the current nickel mined yearly is sufficient to meetthe worlds current energy needs. No combustion process takes place, rather, it appears the hydrogenis fused with nickel and transmuted into copper + energy. LENR also appears possible using metalsother than Ni and Pd.D. Low Cost, Small & Scalable – The LENR devices now said to be coming to market are similar andappear to be very low cost (estimated <$100 BOM/reactor). They appear to all be small in size(12x12x6 inches), relatively easy to manufacture, highly efficient & reliable with no moving parts andsimple to operate, requiring only the replacement of a Ni/H fuel cartridge every 6 months. It appearsthat if true, higher power LENR reactors could be mass produced by the millions.FACT 3.26HIGH POWER LENR, ONCE IT ARRIVES, APPEARS TO BE A NEAR PERFECT & UNLIMITEDENERGY SOURCE FOR HUMANITY THAT CAN BE QUICKLY ROLLED OUT WORLDWIDE
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com)ENERGY DENSITY OF ECAT VS TODAY’S ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES -SIMILAR TO NUCLEAR FISSION ENERGY AND 3-4X ORDERS OFMAGINUTUE GREATER THAN ALL CONVENTIONAL ENERGY27Forbes.com
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com) 2899%CertainTHERE ARE 3 FACTS YOU MUST ANALYZE IN ORDER TOBELIEVE THAT LENR IS AN IMMEDIATE AND TOTALGAME CHANGER IN ENERGY:Tyler’sCertaintyLevel100% 33% by end 201366% by end 201595% by end 2017(Optimistic within 6-36 mos.)Fact 1. LENR is a real,proven energy creatingreactionFact 3. Scaled/controlledLENR is far superior to allexisting forms of energygenerationFact 2. LENR has beenscaled and controlled tocommercial powergenerating levels?
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com)1. Potentially all competing forms of energy generation will disappear over the next 10-30 yr.“Total replacement of fossil fuels for everything but synthetic organic chemistry” NASA 10/111. It will create a long term sustained boom in manufacturing, likely larger than any yet seen.2. It will revolutionize aviation, transportation and space exploration, potentially reducing thespace launch costs by a factor of 5 - 1000x and dramatically increasing velocities for deepspace and sub-orbital travel“Revolutionizes Aviation and Access to Space” NASA 10/111. It will decentralize some power from governments and alter how people are taxed.2. It will enable cheap desalinization of sea-water across the globe and revolutionizeagriculture, creating a worldwide bread-basket and increasing the value of dry lands.3. It will have profound implications on geopolitics and military applications, e.g. subs silentunderwater for years, drones aloft for years, new weapons, etc.4. It may potentially be used to transmute one metal into another, possibly enabling anunlimited supply of any metal (e.g. rare earths, gold, platinum etc) and lowering the valueof nearly all metals.5. It will enable humans to solve Global Climate Change.29COMMERCIAL LENR, WHEN IT ARRIVES,WILL CHANGE EVERYTHING“THE POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS OF THIS PHENOMENON, IFCOMMERCIALIZED, ARE UNLIMITED.” US DEPT. OF DEFENSE, 2009 LINKCONCLUSION:
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com)LENRProof.com30
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com)LEADING LENR THEORIES- DRAFT -31
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com)WITHIN A METAL LATTICE AND UNDER VERY SPECIFIC CONDITIONS, AHYDROGEN PROTON CAN OVERCOME A SUPRESSED COULOMB BARRIERENABLING FUSION AT LOW TEMPERATURESFusion energy occurs when a protonpenetrates into another atom’s nucleus,allowing it to fuse or transmute that atom intoanother element, releasing significant excessenergy. The coulomb barrier is what preventsthis from happening at normal pressures andtemps.It normally takes a huge amount (~4 MeV) ofenergy for a proton to overcome the Coulombbarrier and penetrate into the atom. It isknown that this can be reduced a bit withquantum tunneling effects.LEADING LENR THEORY #1: BECNF THEORY (BOSE-EINSTEIN CONDENSATE NUCLEAR FUSION)Conventional Understandingof the Coulomb Barrier32Led by research from Dr. Yeong E. Kim of PurdueUniversity and built upon work by many includingEinstein-Bose, the traditional description of theCoulomb barrier is believed to be just a special case thatis true only when an atom is isolated in a vacuum.The coulomb barrier can actually be very different whenan atom is not isolated. For atoms within a metallattice (grid), the Coulomb barrier of each atom issuppressed by surrounding, highly symmetric atoms.Within tiny cracks in the metal lattice (the NAE) andunder very specific conditions (e.g. heat, pressure, EMpulsing, pre-loading, quantum tunneling) the Coulombbarrier remains suppressed allowing the H proton tofuse into the metal atom’s nucleus in a Bose-EinsteinCondensate, creating a new element with one higheratomic number, releasing energy. This is achieved atlow temps, instead of millions degrees for an isolatedatom.A Possible New Understandingof the Coulomb Barrier (BECNF Theory)Atoms arranged in a metalLattice, 1nm res. LINKEven with tunneling, thelevel of energy required onlyexists today in stars. Thereare attempts underway toreach these levels usinggiant lasers such as ITER for‘Hot Fusion’. LINKDRAFT
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com)WITHIN A METAL LATTICE AND UNDER VERY SPECIFIC CONDITIONS, A HYDROGEN PROTONCAN CAPTURE ITS ELECTRON, CREATING A NEUTRON, WHICH BONDS WITH HYDROGEN,CAUSING BETA DECAY WHICH RELEASES SIGNFICANT ENERGY• This sustained process results in beta decay, transmutationand significant excess heat released into the metal lattice.This process leverages the weak nuclear force and does notrequire nuclear fusion to occur.• The Widom-Larson Theory, however, predicts the existenceof Neutrinos, which have yet to be detected and leaves afew other key questions unanswered. LINKLEADING LENR THEORY #2: WIDOM-LARSON THEORYWidom-Larson Theory Overview33• The WL Theory postulates that it is not nuclear fusion of the proton, instead, within a metalliclattice (e.g. NI) of a specific geometry and under very specific conditions, when pulsed with EMstimulation, H protons can capture nearby electrons forming neutrons. LINK, LINK• The new neutrons are then captured by the H, forming H2 (Deuterium) which is one neutronheavier, and sheds excess binding energy to the lattice via beta decay. Further pulses allowthe process to repeat to form H3 (Tritium), H4 (Quantium), and ultimately Helium. Eachsuccessive cascade and decay releasing significantly higher levels of energy.Beta decay results in significantenergy release in the lattice NASADRAFT
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com)BACKUP INFO34
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com)LENR EXPERIMENTS SINCE 1989 SHOW TEMPERATURE, NETPOWER GAIN AND POWER DENSITY HAVE CONTINUED TO SCALE*NOTE: CLAIMS FROM ROSSI AND DEFKALION WHICH HAVE YET TO BE FULLY VALIDATED BYOPEN, CREDIBLE 3RDPARTIESFACT 2A.CERN Presentation data, January 2012, Celani LINK36YearPower Gain(%)SustainedPower GainSustainedTemp C Experimenter1989 5% 0.1-1 30 Fleischmann/Pons1990 3 30 McKubre SRI1992 8% 8 30 Celani1993 20% 20 40 University of Osaka1993 50% 40 350 Piantelli, University of Sienna1994 10 40 Kunimatusu1995 40% 20 50 Celani1997 200% 20 40 University of Illinois2002 20% 20 30 University of Osaka2003 15% 10 30 Celani2004 200% 20 300 Celani2005 25% 30 180 University of Osaka2008 10% 5 550 Celani2010 15% 26 990 Celani2011 600% 10000* 100/600 Rossi, Leonardo Corp.2011 2500% 10000* 200 Defkalion2012 15% 24 260 Celani Portable Demo
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com)LENR Scaling:Celani, CERNPresentation, Jan 2012(1 of 3)37http://indico.cern.ch/materialDisplay.py?materialId=slides&confId=177379&utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com) 38LENR Scaling:Celani, CERNPresentation, Jan 2012(2 of 3)
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com) 39LENR Scaling:Celani, CERNPresentation, Jan 2012(3 of 3)
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com)FACT 1A.40LIST OF PEOPLE WHO HAVE DIRECTLY TESTED LENR WITHINPAST 4 YEARS AND CLAIM IT DID NOT PRODUCE A NETENERGY GAINThe Swedish "Defence Materiel Agency recently “performed “rudimentary testing” using NI+Hand claimed that “Neither significant excess heats nor any radiation indicating nuclearreactions, have however been detected in our experiments. We can though not completelyexclude that a reaction, resulting in a very small power output, took place” LINK. (Note, It isnot known if the testing was done using NI processed properly or other conditions sufficientlymet for LENR to occur.)There have also been several failed attempts at LENR replications by experimenters prior tosuccesses. For example, Olga Dmitriyeva, EECS/PhD University Colorado-Boulder, and her teamwere initially not able to achieve power gains beyond chemical reaction levels using Pd-D in2011. LINK Later, in May and September 2012, however, Olga and her team did achievesignificant excess heat production, well beyond chemical reaction levels, using Pd-D and shenow works in a private firm as an LENR scientist: LINK, LINK
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com)Bill Donovan - Chief Technical Adviser for E-CAT Australia withE-CAT Industrial Unit (1MW)Photo: E-CAT Australia, February 2012MORE PICTURES OF THE LEONARDO CORP. E-CAT41Andrea Rossi with two scientists provided by E-CAT Australiaused for validation testing of 1MW E-CAT.Photo: E-CAT Australia, February 20121MW industrial E-CATPhoto: E-CAT Australia, February 2012Andrea Rossi with 1MW industrial E-CATPhoto: E-CAT Australia, February 2012Andrea Rossi with 1MW industrial E-CATPhoto: 11/2011, 12/2012.Daniele Passerini, Aldo Proia, Andrea RossiHot E-CATPhoto: October 12, 2012More Pics 2013
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com)SKEPTICISM OF LENR IS UNDERSTANDABLE, GIVEN THATTHERE HAVE BEEN MANY VERY WELL EXECUTED,CONVINCING ENERGY “SCAMS”Examples of reported previous free energy scams:• Magniwork Perpetual Motion Summary: A perpetual motion magnetically powered generator is not possible. The MagniworkPower Generator scam offers plans to build an energy generator using magnets and magnetic force to induce perpetual motion,thus creating free electrical energy to fully power your home. Visit the Magniwork Perpetual Motion• Free Eco Power Generator Summary: A magnetically powered generator which claims to use magnets and magnetic force toinduce perpetual motion, thus creating free electrical energy to fully power your home. The scam appears to be a copy of the"magniwork" and "free power blueprint" scams. Visit the Free Eco Power Generator• HoJo Motor or Howard Johnson Motor Summary: Yet another version of the magniwork perpetual motion scam. But has come upwith new visuals. It claims magnets and magnetic force will induce perpetual motion, thus creating free electrical energy to fullypower your home. Visit the HoJo Motor• Free Power Blueprint Summary: My Free Power Blueprint offers misleading plans to build an energy generator. The scam appearsto be a copy of the magniwork perpetual motion scam. It claims magnets and magnetic force will induce perpetual motioncreating free electrical energy to fully power your home. Visit the Free Power Blueprint• Magnets4Energy Summary: The scam appears to be a copy of the earlier magniwork perpetual motion scam. Magnets4Energyoffers plans to build an energy generator. It uses magnets and magnetic force to induce perpetual motion, thus creating freeelectrical energy to fully power your home. Visit the Magnets4Energy• Magnetic Generator Summary: A perpetual motion magnetically powered generator is not possible. The Magnetic GeneratorPlans claims instructions to build an energy generator using magnets and magnetic force to induce perpetual motion, thuscreating free electrical energy to fully power your home. Visit the Magnetic Generator Plans post for a product overview and usercomments• John Keely — The grandfather of free-energy scammers. There are still people convinced that he was legitimate LINK, LINK• Carl Tilly — Claimed to have invented a self-powering electric motor. Collected millions from “mom & pop” investors, who finallysued him, at which point he went into hiding. LINK LINK• Stanley Meyer – Water fuel cell, water powered car http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Meyers_water_fuel_cell• For more possible energy scams, please see: http://open4energy.com/tags/scams42
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com)1989 COLD FUSION PRESS COVERAGE & SUBSEQUENT EFFORTSTO DISCREDIT THE FLEISCHMANN & PONS DISCOVERY43In 1989, after the initial discovery wasannounced by F&P, there was significantmainstream media coverage.MIT and others labs discredited thediscovery of cold fusion and as a result itwas labeled a fraud and pseudo-science.It has been reported that MIT had in factvalidated the “F&P effect” in 1989,however the results were reportedlysuppressed by Hot Fusion researchers.LINKIn spite of the recent LENR progress,there has been almost no mainstreammedia coverage. (“Once bitten, twiceshy”) That will likely change dramaticallygiven high power LENR 3rdpartyvalidation or a verified commercial sale.
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com)“I am attacked by two very opposite sects —the scientists and the know-nothings… Yet Iknow I have discovered one of the greatestforces in nature.”Galvani, the discoverer of electricitySOME 250 YEARS AGO…44
Analysis by Tyler van Houwelingen (tyler@azulstar.com)MY BIO• Experience– Founder, Chairman and former CEO – AzulStar, Inc. a 10-yr old wirelessbroadband technology firm; Grand Haven, MI(www.AzulStar.com)– Management Consultant (Technology) – McKinsey & Company; Madrid, Spain(www.McKinsey.com)– Engineer – Intel Corporation; Santa Clara, CA(www.Intel.com)• Education– BS Electrical Engineering 1995 – University of Michigan; Ann Arbor, MI(www.UMich.edu)– MBA 1999 – IESE International School of Management; Barcelona, Spain(www.IESE.edu)• Dutch blood, American passport, Spanish mentality45
1–10 of 17 previous next Post a comment
1–10 of 17 previous next