Infographic that summarizes how Netbackup from Symantec stacks against the EMC. Download the full report here http://go.symantec.com/nbu_vs_e

1. Want More Details on How Competitor “E”
Fared Against NetBackup?
go.symantec.com/nbu_vs_e
Download the Full Report Now
FINDINGS:
NETBACKUP IS 1.7x FASTER THAN COMPETITOR “E”
WHEN PERFORMING A GRANULAR RECOVERY BACKUP.
RESULTS FOR:
GRANULAR RECOVERY
9:00
7:00
8:00
6:00
5:00
4:00
3:00
2:00
1:00
0:00
4:46
8:30
NetBackup enables granular recovery through a single-pass backup.
Competitor “E” requires multiple steps to enable granular recovery.
1X 2X
NetBackup
1.7X
FASTER
0
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
6
4:46
8:3
0
SPEED TEST
Principled Technologies’ benchmark results
show that in a growing enterprise data
center using VMware, NetBackup will scale
significantly better than Competitor “E”.
NetBackup Competitor “E”
RESULTS
HYPERVISOR-LEVEL BACKUP & RECOVERY
ARRAY-BASED SNAPSHOTS
GRANULAR RECOVERY
“NetBackup IS THE MOST
SCALABLE BACKUP
& RECOVERY SOLUTION”
RESULTS FOR:
ARRAY-BASED SNAPSHOTS
16:00
18:00
14:00
12:00
10:00
8:00
6:00
4:00
2:00
0:00
5:04 5:17
6:30
8:28
100 VMs 200 VMs 500 VMs 1,000 VMs
TOTALTIMETOCOMPLETEBACKUP(Minutes:Seconds)
Snapshots can be used to create quicker Recovery Time Objectives (RTOs) and more aggressive
Recovery Point Objectives (RPOs). In less than 9 minutes NetBackup’s snapshot technology
backed up 1,000 Virtual Machines. NetBackup is a leader in snapshot technology, while
Competitor "E" does not support array-based snapshot integration for VMware workloads.
FINDINGS:
NETBACKUP REQUIRES LESS THAN 9 MINUTES TO
BACK UP 1,000 VMs USING ARRAY-BASED SNAPSHOTS.
COMPETITOR “E” DOES NOT SUPPORT
ARRAY-BASED SNAPSHOTS.
FINDINGS:
NETBACKUP IS 3x FASTER THAN
COMPETITOR “E” WHEN BACKING UP 1,000 VMs.
SPEED
RESULTS FOR:
HYPERVISOR-LEVEL BACKUP
8:00
9:00
7:00
6:00
5:00
4:00
3:00
2:00
1:00
0:00
0:25
2:18
0:43
1:11
2:51
3:58
8:36
NetBackup
Competitor “E”
5:22
100 VMs 200 VMs 400 VMs 1,000 VMs
Lower times are better when it comes to backup windows. NetBackup saves
time, especially in large scale environments. As the environment scaled from
100 to 200, 400 and then 1,000 virtual machines, there were dramatic
increases in the time required by Competitor "E" to perform the backups.
TOTALTIMETOCOMPLETEBACKUP(Hours:Minutes)
Zoom & Rotate
9:00
7:00
8:00
6:00
5:00
4:00
3:00
2:00
1:00
0:00
1,000
VMs
2:51
8:36
1X 2X 3X
0
1 2
3
45
78
9
1011
6
2:51
8
:36
NetBackup
3X
FASTER
FOR HYPERVISOR-LEVEL BACKUPSPEED TEST
NetBackup Competitor “E”
RESULTS
VMware Virtual Machines
Competitor “E”NetBackup
VIRTUAL MACHINE GROWTH
=
DATA GROWTH
X
LARGE
SCALE
PROBLEM
TESTS PERFORMED BY
An industry leader and expert in
technology benchmark testing
ALL TESTS BASED ON:
• Enterprise Backup and Recovery Solutions
• Scaling from 100 to 1,000 VMware VMs
• Real-world Situations and Workloads
WHAT IS THE MOST
SCALABLE SOLUTION?
NetBackup Competitor “E”
Principled
®
Technologies
BACKUP & RECOVERY
SCALABILITY BENCHMARK
SCALE IN A VIRTUAL WORLD