SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 25
International Copyright: Foreign
Copyrights in the U.S.


       New York County Lawyers’ Association
                   October 22, 2008
                    New York City

             Raymond J. Dowd – Partner
          Dunnington Bartholow & Miller LLP
         Author – Copyright Litigation Handbook
                            (West 3d Ed. 2008)




                                                  1
Copyright protects


 original works of authorship fixed in any
 tangible medium of expression . . . from
 which they can be perceived, reproduced, or
 otherwise communicated, either directly or
 with the aid of a machine . . . 17 U.S.C. § 102




              www.dunnington.com




                                                   2
Works protected by copyright:
 literary works (including photography, software)
 musical works (lyrics)
 dramatic works (with music)
 pantomimes/choreographic works
 pictorial, graphic, sculptural works
 motion pictures, audiovisual works
 sound recordings
 architectural works
                             17 U.S.C. § 102


               www.dunnington.com




                                                    3
Berne Convention Implementation Act of
1988

 Abolished requirement of “formalities” for a
 copyright to be protected
 Formalities are 1. copyright notice and 2. copyright
 registration
 Now copyright subsists upon fixation
 Registration required for U.S. owners to go to court
 Registration required for Berne Convention owners
 to get statutory damages and attorneys fees
 See materials CLH at §§ 1:3, 1:4; 1:5; 1:7


                www.dunnington.com




                                                        4
Definition of “Berne Convention
  work” (Part I)
A work is a “Berne Convention work” if —
(1) in the case of an unpublished work, one or more of the authors is
a national of a nation adhering to the Berne Convention, or in the case
of a published work, one or more of the authors is a national of a nation
adhering to the Berne Convention on the date of first publication;


(2) the work was first published in a nation adhering to the Berne Convention,
or was simultaneously first published in a nation adhering to the Berne
Convention and in a foreign nation that does not adhere to the Berne
Convention;




                                  www.dunnington.com




                                                                                 5
Definition of “Berne Convention work” (Part II)



  (3) in the case of an audiovisual work —
  (A) if one or more of the authors is a legal entity, that author has its
 headquarters in a nation adhering to the Berne Convention; or
  (B) if one or more of the authors is an individual, that author is domiciled,
      or has his or her habitual residence in, a nation adhering to the Berne
      Convention; or
  (4) in the case of a pictorial, graphic, or sculptural work that is incorporated
  in a building or other structure, the building or structure is located in a nation adhering
  to the Berne Convention; or
  (5) in the case of an architectural work embodied in a building, such building is
       erected in a country adhering to the Berne Convention.

  For purposes of paragraph (1), an author who is domiciled in or has his or her
  habitual residence in, a nation adhering to the Berne Convention is considered
  to be a national of that nation. For purposes of paragraph (2), a work is
  considered to have been simultaneously published in two or more nations if
  its dates of publication are within 30 days of one another.




                            www.dunnington.com




                                                                                                6
Berne Convention works

 Statutory damages and attorneys fees strong
 incentives for Berne Convention work
 owners to register copyrights in U.S.
 Exclusive licensees must record to have
 standing to sue in U.S.
 Registration must take place prior to
 infringement to obtain damages and attorneys
 fees


             www.dunnington.com




                                                7
8
9
10
Copyright registration as “sculptural work” denied. Originality
refers to a work’s origin with an author and to the embodiment
of more than trivial variations from works within the public
domain. Insufficient “sculptural authorship” since the shape
was determined by the building’s contours and wrapping
predetermined by the building’s shape.
“Wrapped Reichstag, Berlin 1971-95” Christo & Jeanne Claude

                        www.dunnington.com




                                                                  11
Determining Copyright Status of
Berne Convention Works

   Title search (companies such as Thomson)
   Conduct copyright investigation (see Circular 22)
   Copyright Office records incomplete
   From www.copyright.gov:

Protection in Foreign Countries
  Even if you conclude that a work is in the public domain in the
  United States, this does not necessarily mean that you are free
  to use it in other countries. Every nation has its own laws
  governing the length and scope of copyright protection, and
  these are applicable to uses of the work within that nation’s
  borders. Thus, the expiration or loss of copyright protection in
  the United States may still leave the work fully protected
  against unauthorized use in other countries.


                     www.dunnington.com




                                                                     12
13
Under prior law, publication without a copyright notice put a
copyrighted work in the public domain. Certain foreign works that
fell into public domain have been restored. Under current law,
copyright notices are not necessary for copyright protection.
Material entering the public domain has been greatly restricted.


See, e.g., Troll Co. v. Uneeda Doll Co., 483 F.3d 150 (2d. Cir.
2007)(foreign troll falling in and out of public domain)
                          www.dunnington.com




                                                                    14
The First Sale Doctrine




    and Imports




            www.dunnington.com




                                 15
First sale doctrine: once a copyright owner sells an object containing the copy, the
owner can’t control subsequent distribution. Codified at 17 U.S.C. § 109 (a).


Bourne v. Walt Disney Company, 68 F.3d 621 (2d Cir. 1995)
                                www.dunnington.com




                                                                                       16
Once U.S. copyright owner makes “lawful copy” in U.S.A. and sells
anywhere in the world, has exhausted rights and first sale doctrine may
be asserted as a defense by a re-importer.
Quality King Dists. Inc. v. L’Anza Research Int’l, Inc., 523 U.S. 135
(1998).
                            www.dunnington.com




                                                                          17
International exception to the first sale doctrine: sales of copyrighted goods manufactured
and first sold outside the U.S. may not be imported to the U.S. without copyright owner’s
consent. First sale doctrine applies only where a manufacture and first sale in the United
States. See 17 U.S.C. § 602 (Infringing importation of copies or phonorecords).
Omega S.A. v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 541 F.3d 982 (9th Cir. 2008)
                                  www.dunnington.com




                                                                                              18
Jurisdiction over Foreign Infringers




            www.dunnington.com




                                       19
Where infringer is operating offshore (the island of Vanuatu), under Rule
4(k)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, jurisdiction may be exercised
where sufficient contacts with, or injury to, U.S. residents is alleged, even
though there are not sufficient contacts with any one state to justify jurisdiction
in that state.
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., 243 F. Supp.2d 1073,
1094 (C.D. Cal. 2003).
                              www.dunnington.com




                                                                                      20
Extraterritorial acts: U.S. courts will exercise jurisdiction over foreign
defendants whose extraterritorial acts aid, induce or contribute to copyright
infringement by another in the United States.
GB Marketing USA Inc. v. Gerolsteiner Brunnen GmbH & Co., 782 F.
Supp. 763, 772 (W.D.N.Y. 1991).
                             www.dunnington.com




                                                                                21
Foreign copyrights and claims in U.S.
Courts




             www.dunnington.com




                                        22
Foreign copyright claims may be pleaded in U.S. courts in diversity
cases or under the doctrine of supplemental jurisdiction. For five
photographs of Lindsay Lohan published without authorization, the
court reserved decision on U.K. copyright claims, noting that the court
has discretion to decline such jurisdiction.
X17 Inc. v. Hollywood TV Inc., 2008 WL 4527865 (C.D. Cal. 2008).
                          www.dunnington.com




                                                                          23
Ownership of Russian copyrights to works first published in Russia
governed by Russian law, questions of infringements of Russian
copyrights governed by U.S. law where infringement in U.S. by U.S.
corporation.
Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v. Russian Kurier, Inc., 153 F.3d 82 (2d
Cir 1998).           www.dunnington.com




                                                                         24
Thanks to Thomson West


For use of Copyright Litigation Handbook
excerpts.




                                           25

More Related Content

What's hot

I’m so confused — what is prior art now?
I’m so confused — what is prior art now? I’m so confused — what is prior art now?
I’m so confused — what is prior art now? Marc Hubbard
 
World IP Day at M-SParc: "IP, What is is, Why you should know about it, Advic...
World IP Day at M-SParc: "IP, What is is, Why you should know about it, Advic...World IP Day at M-SParc: "IP, What is is, Why you should know about it, Advic...
World IP Day at M-SParc: "IP, What is is, Why you should know about it, Advic...Jane Lambert
 
Copyright in a Nutshell
Copyright in a NutshellCopyright in a Nutshell
Copyright in a NutshellHVCClibrary
 
ORTEL_INTIP_FINALDRAFT
ORTEL_INTIP_FINALDRAFTORTEL_INTIP_FINALDRAFT
ORTEL_INTIP_FINALDRAFTCarly Ortel
 
Appeals Court: Guantanamo Bay Detainees Can't Be Transferred to U.S.
Appeals Court: Guantanamo Bay Detainees Can't Be Transferred to U.S.Appeals Court: Guantanamo Bay Detainees Can't Be Transferred to U.S.
Appeals Court: Guantanamo Bay Detainees Can't Be Transferred to U.S.LegalDocs
 
When is it OK to reuse other people's photos or other content
When is it OK to reuse other people's photos or other contentWhen is it OK to reuse other people's photos or other content
When is it OK to reuse other people's photos or other contentJane Lambert
 
AIA - Overview
AIA - OverviewAIA - Overview
AIA - Overviewwindslashz
 
US patent practice tips
US patent practice tipsUS patent practice tips
US patent practice tipsKisuk Lee
 
2005.05.13 cases and materials on patent law 1st ed.by adelman, rader, thomas...
2005.05.13 cases and materials on patent law 1st ed.by adelman, rader, thomas...2005.05.13 cases and materials on patent law 1st ed.by adelman, rader, thomas...
2005.05.13 cases and materials on patent law 1st ed.by adelman, rader, thomas...Kern Spinner
 
European & us patent law module3 2013 updated
European & us patent law  module3 2013 updatedEuropean & us patent law  module3 2013 updated
European & us patent law module3 2013 updatedIP Dome
 
Spirt v Pike - MSJ Order - April 2, 2014
Spirt v Pike - MSJ Order - April 2, 2014Spirt v Pike - MSJ Order - April 2, 2014
Spirt v Pike - MSJ Order - April 2, 2014Bruce Samuels
 

What's hot (17)

USA Patent Reform
USA Patent ReformUSA Patent Reform
USA Patent Reform
 
I’m so confused — what is prior art now?
I’m so confused — what is prior art now? I’m so confused — what is prior art now?
I’m so confused — what is prior art now?
 
World IP Day at M-SParc: "IP, What is is, Why you should know about it, Advic...
World IP Day at M-SParc: "IP, What is is, Why you should know about it, Advic...World IP Day at M-SParc: "IP, What is is, Why you should know about it, Advic...
World IP Day at M-SParc: "IP, What is is, Why you should know about it, Advic...
 
Copyright in a Nutshell
Copyright in a NutshellCopyright in a Nutshell
Copyright in a Nutshell
 
ORTEL_INTIP_FINALDRAFT
ORTEL_INTIP_FINALDRAFTORTEL_INTIP_FINALDRAFT
ORTEL_INTIP_FINALDRAFT
 
Appeals Court: Guantanamo Bay Detainees Can't Be Transferred to U.S.
Appeals Court: Guantanamo Bay Detainees Can't Be Transferred to U.S.Appeals Court: Guantanamo Bay Detainees Can't Be Transferred to U.S.
Appeals Court: Guantanamo Bay Detainees Can't Be Transferred to U.S.
 
Ankush 2
Ankush 2Ankush 2
Ankush 2
 
The America Invents Act
The America Invents ActThe America Invents Act
The America Invents Act
 
When is it OK to reuse other people's photos or other content
When is it OK to reuse other people's photos or other contentWhen is it OK to reuse other people's photos or other content
When is it OK to reuse other people's photos or other content
 
America Invents Act
America Invents ActAmerica Invents Act
America Invents Act
 
AIA - Overview
AIA - OverviewAIA - Overview
AIA - Overview
 
US patent practice tips
US patent practice tipsUS patent practice tips
US patent practice tips
 
2005.05.13 cases and materials on patent law 1st ed.by adelman, rader, thomas...
2005.05.13 cases and materials on patent law 1st ed.by adelman, rader, thomas...2005.05.13 cases and materials on patent law 1st ed.by adelman, rader, thomas...
2005.05.13 cases and materials on patent law 1st ed.by adelman, rader, thomas...
 
Invention 2 Venture: Chris Rothe
Invention 2 Venture: Chris RotheInvention 2 Venture: Chris Rothe
Invention 2 Venture: Chris Rothe
 
European & us patent law module3 2013 updated
European & us patent law  module3 2013 updatedEuropean & us patent law  module3 2013 updated
European & us patent law module3 2013 updated
 
Spirt v Pike - MSJ Order - April 2, 2014
Spirt v Pike - MSJ Order - April 2, 2014Spirt v Pike - MSJ Order - April 2, 2014
Spirt v Pike - MSJ Order - April 2, 2014
 
Creative Output
Creative OutputCreative Output
Creative Output
 

Viewers also liked

OWBC Scrapbooks Chap1
OWBC Scrapbooks Chap1OWBC Scrapbooks Chap1
OWBC Scrapbooks Chap1eveningsky
 
Making Joyful Noise With Your Computer For Fun and Profit
Making Joyful Noise With Your Computer For Fun and ProfitMaking Joyful Noise With Your Computer For Fun and Profit
Making Joyful Noise With Your Computer For Fun and ProfitCDPUG
 
Results from whi and hers ii
Results from whi and hers iiResults from whi and hers ii
Results from whi and hers iifalcaoebarros
 
Evaluation questions
Evaluation questionsEvaluation questions
Evaluation questionsmgnbrsln
 
Animal Bioacoustics by Steve Sens
Animal Bioacoustics by Steve SensAnimal Bioacoustics by Steve Sens
Animal Bioacoustics by Steve SensCDPUG
 
Art Litigation and Dispute Resolution Institute
Art Litigation and Dispute Resolution InstituteArt Litigation and Dispute Resolution Institute
Art Litigation and Dispute Resolution InstituteRaymond Dowd
 
Intellectual Property Crimes CLE
Intellectual Property Crimes CLEIntellectual Property Crimes CLE
Intellectual Property Crimes CLERaymond Dowd
 
Copyright litigation handbook contents and overview
Copyright litigation handbook   contents and overviewCopyright litigation handbook   contents and overview
Copyright litigation handbook contents and overviewRaymond Dowd
 
Intellectual Property Slide Deck for Video Project
Intellectual Property Slide Deck for Video ProjectIntellectual Property Slide Deck for Video Project
Intellectual Property Slide Deck for Video ProjectBrouseMcDowell
 
What has been learned from the major observational
What has been learned from the major observationalWhat has been learned from the major observational
What has been learned from the major observationalfalcaoebarros
 
Federal Bar Association ND Ohio IP Crimes Seminar on Nazi Art Looting
Federal Bar Association ND Ohio IP Crimes Seminar on Nazi Art LootingFederal Bar Association ND Ohio IP Crimes Seminar on Nazi Art Looting
Federal Bar Association ND Ohio IP Crimes Seminar on Nazi Art LootingRaymond Dowd
 
Nazi Art Looting Case Developments [Compatibility Mode] Compressed
Nazi Art Looting   Case Developments [Compatibility Mode] CompressedNazi Art Looting   Case Developments [Compatibility Mode] Compressed
Nazi Art Looting Case Developments [Compatibility Mode] CompressedRaymond Dowd
 
Ray dowd copyright, ethics & social media- what the connected lawyer needs t...
Ray dowd  copyright, ethics & social media- what the connected lawyer needs t...Ray dowd  copyright, ethics & social media- what the connected lawyer needs t...
Ray dowd copyright, ethics & social media- what the connected lawyer needs t...Raymond Dowd
 
Sothebys Institute Egon Schieles Dead City
Sothebys Institute Egon Schieles Dead CitySothebys Institute Egon Schieles Dead City
Sothebys Institute Egon Schieles Dead CityRaymond Dowd
 

Viewers also liked (16)

OWBC Scrapbooks Chap1
OWBC Scrapbooks Chap1OWBC Scrapbooks Chap1
OWBC Scrapbooks Chap1
 
Making Joyful Noise With Your Computer For Fun and Profit
Making Joyful Noise With Your Computer For Fun and ProfitMaking Joyful Noise With Your Computer For Fun and Profit
Making Joyful Noise With Your Computer For Fun and Profit
 
Results from whi and hers ii
Results from whi and hers iiResults from whi and hers ii
Results from whi and hers ii
 
Evaluation questions
Evaluation questionsEvaluation questions
Evaluation questions
 
Animal Bioacoustics by Steve Sens
Animal Bioacoustics by Steve SensAnimal Bioacoustics by Steve Sens
Animal Bioacoustics by Steve Sens
 
Art Litigation and Dispute Resolution Institute
Art Litigation and Dispute Resolution InstituteArt Litigation and Dispute Resolution Institute
Art Litigation and Dispute Resolution Institute
 
Intellectual Property Crimes CLE
Intellectual Property Crimes CLEIntellectual Property Crimes CLE
Intellectual Property Crimes CLE
 
Copyright litigation handbook contents and overview
Copyright litigation handbook   contents and overviewCopyright litigation handbook   contents and overview
Copyright litigation handbook contents and overview
 
Intellectual Property Slide Deck for Video Project
Intellectual Property Slide Deck for Video ProjectIntellectual Property Slide Deck for Video Project
Intellectual Property Slide Deck for Video Project
 
The Great Gatsby Chapter 9
The Great Gatsby Chapter 9The Great Gatsby Chapter 9
The Great Gatsby Chapter 9
 
What has been learned from the major observational
What has been learned from the major observationalWhat has been learned from the major observational
What has been learned from the major observational
 
Federal Bar Association ND Ohio IP Crimes Seminar on Nazi Art Looting
Federal Bar Association ND Ohio IP Crimes Seminar on Nazi Art LootingFederal Bar Association ND Ohio IP Crimes Seminar on Nazi Art Looting
Federal Bar Association ND Ohio IP Crimes Seminar on Nazi Art Looting
 
Nazi Art Looting Case Developments [Compatibility Mode] Compressed
Nazi Art Looting   Case Developments [Compatibility Mode] CompressedNazi Art Looting   Case Developments [Compatibility Mode] Compressed
Nazi Art Looting Case Developments [Compatibility Mode] Compressed
 
Intellectual Property Crimes : Research Tools & Strategies
Intellectual Property Crimes : Research Tools & StrategiesIntellectual Property Crimes : Research Tools & Strategies
Intellectual Property Crimes : Research Tools & Strategies
 
Ray dowd copyright, ethics & social media- what the connected lawyer needs t...
Ray dowd  copyright, ethics & social media- what the connected lawyer needs t...Ray dowd  copyright, ethics & social media- what the connected lawyer needs t...
Ray dowd copyright, ethics & social media- what the connected lawyer needs t...
 
Sothebys Institute Egon Schieles Dead City
Sothebys Institute Egon Schieles Dead CitySothebys Institute Egon Schieles Dead City
Sothebys Institute Egon Schieles Dead City
 

Similar to International Copyright Foreign Copyrights In Us Courts

Mbu 2520 spring 2018 chapter 13
Mbu 2520 spring 2018 chapter 13Mbu 2520 spring 2018 chapter 13
Mbu 2520 spring 2018 chapter 13Eric Griffin
 
Cyberlaw overview presentation v2
Cyberlaw overview presentation v2Cyberlaw overview presentation v2
Cyberlaw overview presentation v2Mark Coatney
 
How International IP Laws Affect PR Practice in the Digital Age
How International IP Laws Affect PR Practice in the Digital AgeHow International IP Laws Affect PR Practice in the Digital Age
How International IP Laws Affect PR Practice in the Digital AgeSarah Jackson
 
Long Arm of the Law, by Jack Bernard, University of Michigan
Long Arm of the Law, by Jack Bernard, University of MichiganLong Arm of the Law, by Jack Bernard, University of Michigan
Long Arm of the Law, by Jack Bernard, University of MichiganCharleston Conference
 
Conflict of laws in IPR
Conflict of laws in IPRConflict of laws in IPR
Conflict of laws in IPRRia Tandon
 
Intellectual Property Rights Violations: Federal Civil Remedies and Criminal ...
Intellectual Property Rights Violations: Federal Civil Remedies and Criminal ...Intellectual Property Rights Violations: Federal Civil Remedies and Criminal ...
Intellectual Property Rights Violations: Federal Civil Remedies and Criminal ...Karol Pessin
 
Copyright basics
Copyright basicsCopyright basics
Copyright basicsDonna Kesot
 
What Licensing Lawyers Should Know About Litigation
What Licensing Lawyers Should Know About LitigationWhat Licensing Lawyers Should Know About Litigation
What Licensing Lawyers Should Know About LitigationRoger Royse
 
What Licensing Lawyers Should Know About Litigation
What Licensing Lawyers Should Know About LitigationWhat Licensing Lawyers Should Know About Litigation
What Licensing Lawyers Should Know About LitigationRoger Royse
 
First Natl Acceptance Co. v. City of Utica_12-cv-01622-0[1]
First Natl Acceptance Co. v. City of Utica_12-cv-01622-0[1]First Natl Acceptance Co. v. City of Utica_12-cv-01622-0[1]
First Natl Acceptance Co. v. City of Utica_12-cv-01622-0[1]James Evans
 
What is the threat to culture by a read-only world, and how do t.pdf
What is the threat to culture by a read-only world, and how do t.pdfWhat is the threat to culture by a read-only world, and how do t.pdf
What is the threat to culture by a read-only world, and how do t.pdfforwardcom41
 
First Sale Doctrine & Foreign Manufactured Goods - Kirtsaeng v. Wiley
First Sale Doctrine & Foreign Manufactured Goods - Kirtsaeng v. WileyFirst Sale Doctrine & Foreign Manufactured Goods - Kirtsaeng v. Wiley
First Sale Doctrine & Foreign Manufactured Goods - Kirtsaeng v. WileyAlexis Hart McDowell
 
Kiobel: Major U.S. Jurisdictional Limitation for Overseas Actions
Kiobel: Major U.S. Jurisdictional Limitation for Overseas ActionsKiobel: Major U.S. Jurisdictional Limitation for Overseas Actions
Kiobel: Major U.S. Jurisdictional Limitation for Overseas ActionsPatton Boggs LLP
 

Similar to International Copyright Foreign Copyrights In Us Courts (20)

Intellectual property law
Intellectual property lawIntellectual property law
Intellectual property law
 
Mbu 2520 spring 2018 chapter 13
Mbu 2520 spring 2018 chapter 13Mbu 2520 spring 2018 chapter 13
Mbu 2520 spring 2018 chapter 13
 
6.copyright.2020
6.copyright.20206.copyright.2020
6.copyright.2020
 
Cyberlaw overview presentation v2
Cyberlaw overview presentation v2Cyberlaw overview presentation v2
Cyberlaw overview presentation v2
 
Copyright law
Copyright lawCopyright law
Copyright law
 
How International IP Laws Affect PR Practice in the Digital Age
How International IP Laws Affect PR Practice in the Digital AgeHow International IP Laws Affect PR Practice in the Digital Age
How International IP Laws Affect PR Practice in the Digital Age
 
Copyright universal design_ecomp6204
Copyright universal design_ecomp6204Copyright universal design_ecomp6204
Copyright universal design_ecomp6204
 
Long Arm of the Law, by Jack Bernard, University of Michigan
Long Arm of the Law, by Jack Bernard, University of MichiganLong Arm of the Law, by Jack Bernard, University of Michigan
Long Arm of the Law, by Jack Bernard, University of Michigan
 
Federal Circuit Review | April 2013
Federal Circuit Review | April 2013Federal Circuit Review | April 2013
Federal Circuit Review | April 2013
 
Conflict of laws in IPR
Conflict of laws in IPRConflict of laws in IPR
Conflict of laws in IPR
 
Intellectual Property Rights Violations: Federal Civil Remedies and Criminal ...
Intellectual Property Rights Violations: Federal Civil Remedies and Criminal ...Intellectual Property Rights Violations: Federal Civil Remedies and Criminal ...
Intellectual Property Rights Violations: Federal Civil Remedies and Criminal ...
 
Copyright basics
Copyright basicsCopyright basics
Copyright basics
 
What Licensing Lawyers Should Know About Litigation
What Licensing Lawyers Should Know About LitigationWhat Licensing Lawyers Should Know About Litigation
What Licensing Lawyers Should Know About Litigation
 
What Licensing Lawyers Should Know About Litigation
What Licensing Lawyers Should Know About LitigationWhat Licensing Lawyers Should Know About Litigation
What Licensing Lawyers Should Know About Litigation
 
Amanda Whitt-Seminar Paper
Amanda Whitt-Seminar PaperAmanda Whitt-Seminar Paper
Amanda Whitt-Seminar Paper
 
First Natl Acceptance Co. v. City of Utica_12-cv-01622-0[1]
First Natl Acceptance Co. v. City of Utica_12-cv-01622-0[1]First Natl Acceptance Co. v. City of Utica_12-cv-01622-0[1]
First Natl Acceptance Co. v. City of Utica_12-cv-01622-0[1]
 
What is the threat to culture by a read-only world, and how do t.pdf
What is the threat to culture by a read-only world, and how do t.pdfWhat is the threat to culture by a read-only world, and how do t.pdf
What is the threat to culture by a read-only world, and how do t.pdf
 
First Sale Doctrine & Foreign Manufactured Goods - Kirtsaeng v. Wiley
First Sale Doctrine & Foreign Manufactured Goods - Kirtsaeng v. WileyFirst Sale Doctrine & Foreign Manufactured Goods - Kirtsaeng v. Wiley
First Sale Doctrine & Foreign Manufactured Goods - Kirtsaeng v. Wiley
 
Artem vaulin-complaint
Artem vaulin-complaintArtem vaulin-complaint
Artem vaulin-complaint
 
Kiobel: Major U.S. Jurisdictional Limitation for Overseas Actions
Kiobel: Major U.S. Jurisdictional Limitation for Overseas ActionsKiobel: Major U.S. Jurisdictional Limitation for Overseas Actions
Kiobel: Major U.S. Jurisdictional Limitation for Overseas Actions
 

International Copyright Foreign Copyrights In Us Courts

  • 1. International Copyright: Foreign Copyrights in the U.S. New York County Lawyers’ Association October 22, 2008 New York City Raymond J. Dowd – Partner Dunnington Bartholow & Miller LLP Author – Copyright Litigation Handbook (West 3d Ed. 2008) 1
  • 2. Copyright protects original works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression . . . from which they can be perceived, reproduced, or otherwise communicated, either directly or with the aid of a machine . . . 17 U.S.C. § 102 www.dunnington.com 2
  • 3. Works protected by copyright: literary works (including photography, software) musical works (lyrics) dramatic works (with music) pantomimes/choreographic works pictorial, graphic, sculptural works motion pictures, audiovisual works sound recordings architectural works 17 U.S.C. § 102 www.dunnington.com 3
  • 4. Berne Convention Implementation Act of 1988 Abolished requirement of “formalities” for a copyright to be protected Formalities are 1. copyright notice and 2. copyright registration Now copyright subsists upon fixation Registration required for U.S. owners to go to court Registration required for Berne Convention owners to get statutory damages and attorneys fees See materials CLH at §§ 1:3, 1:4; 1:5; 1:7 www.dunnington.com 4
  • 5. Definition of “Berne Convention work” (Part I) A work is a “Berne Convention work” if — (1) in the case of an unpublished work, one or more of the authors is a national of a nation adhering to the Berne Convention, or in the case of a published work, one or more of the authors is a national of a nation adhering to the Berne Convention on the date of first publication; (2) the work was first published in a nation adhering to the Berne Convention, or was simultaneously first published in a nation adhering to the Berne Convention and in a foreign nation that does not adhere to the Berne Convention; www.dunnington.com 5
  • 6. Definition of “Berne Convention work” (Part II) (3) in the case of an audiovisual work — (A) if one or more of the authors is a legal entity, that author has its headquarters in a nation adhering to the Berne Convention; or (B) if one or more of the authors is an individual, that author is domiciled, or has his or her habitual residence in, a nation adhering to the Berne Convention; or (4) in the case of a pictorial, graphic, or sculptural work that is incorporated in a building or other structure, the building or structure is located in a nation adhering to the Berne Convention; or (5) in the case of an architectural work embodied in a building, such building is erected in a country adhering to the Berne Convention. For purposes of paragraph (1), an author who is domiciled in or has his or her habitual residence in, a nation adhering to the Berne Convention is considered to be a national of that nation. For purposes of paragraph (2), a work is considered to have been simultaneously published in two or more nations if its dates of publication are within 30 days of one another. www.dunnington.com 6
  • 7. Berne Convention works Statutory damages and attorneys fees strong incentives for Berne Convention work owners to register copyrights in U.S. Exclusive licensees must record to have standing to sue in U.S. Registration must take place prior to infringement to obtain damages and attorneys fees www.dunnington.com 7
  • 8. 8
  • 9. 9
  • 10. 10
  • 11. Copyright registration as “sculptural work” denied. Originality refers to a work’s origin with an author and to the embodiment of more than trivial variations from works within the public domain. Insufficient “sculptural authorship” since the shape was determined by the building’s contours and wrapping predetermined by the building’s shape. “Wrapped Reichstag, Berlin 1971-95” Christo & Jeanne Claude www.dunnington.com 11
  • 12. Determining Copyright Status of Berne Convention Works Title search (companies such as Thomson) Conduct copyright investigation (see Circular 22) Copyright Office records incomplete From www.copyright.gov: Protection in Foreign Countries Even if you conclude that a work is in the public domain in the United States, this does not necessarily mean that you are free to use it in other countries. Every nation has its own laws governing the length and scope of copyright protection, and these are applicable to uses of the work within that nation’s borders. Thus, the expiration or loss of copyright protection in the United States may still leave the work fully protected against unauthorized use in other countries. www.dunnington.com 12
  • 13. 13
  • 14. Under prior law, publication without a copyright notice put a copyrighted work in the public domain. Certain foreign works that fell into public domain have been restored. Under current law, copyright notices are not necessary for copyright protection. Material entering the public domain has been greatly restricted. See, e.g., Troll Co. v. Uneeda Doll Co., 483 F.3d 150 (2d. Cir. 2007)(foreign troll falling in and out of public domain) www.dunnington.com 14
  • 15. The First Sale Doctrine and Imports www.dunnington.com 15
  • 16. First sale doctrine: once a copyright owner sells an object containing the copy, the owner can’t control subsequent distribution. Codified at 17 U.S.C. § 109 (a). Bourne v. Walt Disney Company, 68 F.3d 621 (2d Cir. 1995) www.dunnington.com 16
  • 17. Once U.S. copyright owner makes “lawful copy” in U.S.A. and sells anywhere in the world, has exhausted rights and first sale doctrine may be asserted as a defense by a re-importer. Quality King Dists. Inc. v. L’Anza Research Int’l, Inc., 523 U.S. 135 (1998). www.dunnington.com 17
  • 18. International exception to the first sale doctrine: sales of copyrighted goods manufactured and first sold outside the U.S. may not be imported to the U.S. without copyright owner’s consent. First sale doctrine applies only where a manufacture and first sale in the United States. See 17 U.S.C. § 602 (Infringing importation of copies or phonorecords). Omega S.A. v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 541 F.3d 982 (9th Cir. 2008) www.dunnington.com 18
  • 19. Jurisdiction over Foreign Infringers www.dunnington.com 19
  • 20. Where infringer is operating offshore (the island of Vanuatu), under Rule 4(k)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, jurisdiction may be exercised where sufficient contacts with, or injury to, U.S. residents is alleged, even though there are not sufficient contacts with any one state to justify jurisdiction in that state. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., 243 F. Supp.2d 1073, 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2003). www.dunnington.com 20
  • 21. Extraterritorial acts: U.S. courts will exercise jurisdiction over foreign defendants whose extraterritorial acts aid, induce or contribute to copyright infringement by another in the United States. GB Marketing USA Inc. v. Gerolsteiner Brunnen GmbH & Co., 782 F. Supp. 763, 772 (W.D.N.Y. 1991). www.dunnington.com 21
  • 22. Foreign copyrights and claims in U.S. Courts www.dunnington.com 22
  • 23. Foreign copyright claims may be pleaded in U.S. courts in diversity cases or under the doctrine of supplemental jurisdiction. For five photographs of Lindsay Lohan published without authorization, the court reserved decision on U.K. copyright claims, noting that the court has discretion to decline such jurisdiction. X17 Inc. v. Hollywood TV Inc., 2008 WL 4527865 (C.D. Cal. 2008). www.dunnington.com 23
  • 24. Ownership of Russian copyrights to works first published in Russia governed by Russian law, questions of infringements of Russian copyrights governed by U.S. law where infringement in U.S. by U.S. corporation. Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v. Russian Kurier, Inc., 153 F.3d 82 (2d Cir 1998). www.dunnington.com 24
  • 25. Thanks to Thomson West For use of Copyright Litigation Handbook excerpts. 25