1. eWeek http://www.eweek.com/index2.php?option=content&task=view&id=524...
Warning: extract() [function.extract]: First argument should be an array in /home/servers/www.eweek.com
/www/includes/templating.php on line 34
Security
The First Linux Botnet
By Larry Seltzer
2009-03-24
Article Views: 16707
Article Rating: / 28
The main thing keeping Linux desktops out of botnets is the sophistication of their Rate This Article:
users, but the people who built Psyb0t knew most people don't pay much
Poor Best
attention to router security.
They're calling it the first botnet designed for broadband equipment and routers,
Add This Article To:
and that it is. But it's also the first of something else: Psyb0t is the first Linux
botnet.
Digg this Furl
And even though it's running on hardware devices and even though it's running on Del.icio.us Google
Linux, and an obscure distribution of Linux at that, the basic mechanisms of it
aren't that different from quot;conventionalquot; botnets that run on Windows PCs. Slashdot Simpy
There's a lesson here.
Y! My Web Spurl!
Linux seems to be a great platform for these little embedded devices. It's small E-mail PDF Version
enough that it can fit in economical hardware, portable enough that you can put it
Print
on almost any processor and platform, and it's got great networking tools. This
particular bot runs on Linux Mipsel devices (quot;Mipselquot; refers to little-endian
implementations on MIPS processors, generally, but not exclusively, on Linux). But it's not hard to see the same thing
happening to any sufficiently large population of Internet-facing devices based on Linux or any other platform. I'm
especially curious about DVRs now.
We often speak about how malware writers write for Windows because that's where the systems are and because
that's where the development tools are, for malware and more generally. The same could be said now of Linux: The
fact that a device runs Linux means it's easy to write binaries for it that do networking tasks, including hardening the
bot and distributed denials of service.
How does Psyb0t work? The main vulnerability it seems to exploit is simply weak or nonexistent authentication. One
involved device is the NetComm NB5 ADSL (asymmetric DSL) modem, earlier versions of which were administrable
from the WAN side by default. In fact, some were administrable without any log-in at all. Of course updates were
made, but when was the last time you applied an update to your ADSL router? I've seen vaguer reports of other
vulnerabilities used.
Resource Library:
According to DroneBL, the DNS (Domain Name System) blacklist service that found the botnet, Psyb0t appears to
have been shut down just recently.
The bot will not persist if the router is power-cycled, but who does that on purpose? I also wouldn't discount the
possibility that such a bot could be built to flash itself into an EPROM (erasable programmable ROM) or some other
persistent memory, and then the device would probably be unsalvageable. Such an attack would be highly model-
specific.
1 of 2 3/27/2009 10:53 PM

2. eWeek http://www.eweek.com/index2.php?option=content&task=view&id=524...
The problem with routers is that they're quot;set and forgetquot; devices. Often they're designed to just work out of the box
with no configuration at all. Users won't change the default admin password, they won't check to see if security
options are turned on, and the last thing they would ever do is check to see if there's a firmware upgrade that fixes a
serious vulnerability in the router. Who even realizes that these things are little computers?
It's also easy to imagine a router botnet being built off a Windows botnet. Once you have control of a system inside
the network, it's easy to start probing the device at 192.168.1.1 (or, in fact, whatever the address of the local
gateway device is) with the same sort of dictionary attack used by Psyb0t. With some effort you could actually build a
cross-platform bot with a standard series of interfaces.
The initial research shows that the Psyb0t botnet has at least 100,000 nodes in it, and this is from devices, according
to the reports, that don't have much presence in the West. This paper on the Psyb0t botnet (PDF) discusses the
hardware in more detail, including information about the vulnerabilities exploited. According to the paper:
Modems with similar hardware configurations (unknown brands) from Italy, Brazil, Ecuador, Russia,
Ukraine, Turkey, Peru, Malaysia, Columbia, India and Egypt (and likely more countries) also seem to be
affected, and are spreading the bot.
There are, and have been for many years, Linux-based embedded devices popular in the United States and Europe,
and they must have their own vulnerabilities. I'm expecting malware authors to be inspired by this to build similar
networks. Consider this list of Linux router or firewall distributions as a starting point.
This makes these devices a mass community of targets for attacks on default configuration errors. And it all just goes
to prove there's nothing inherent in Linux that makes it more secure. It's all about how you configure an operating
system to function, out of the box and with user intervention. The main thing keeping Linux on the desktop out of
botnets is the sophistication of its users. Without that, embedded Linux devices are only as secure as the vendors
want to make them. Given that vendors will usually make the security versus ease of use trade-off in favor of ease, I
think Psyb0t may just be the tip of the iceberg.
What can you do for your own devices? Apply the latest firmware and make sure they have nontrivial admin
passwords. And if there's an option for remote administration, make sure it's turned off.
Security Center Editor Larry Seltzer has worked in and written about the computer industry since 1983.
For insights on security coverage around the Web, take a look at eWEEK.com Security Center Editor Larry Seltzer's
blog Cheap Hack.
Email Article To Friend ♦ Print Version Of Article ♦ PDF Version Of Article
2 of 2 3/27/2009 10:53 PM